#synergy #theinterlexgroup #rigameeting #2015
TRANSCRIPT
18.05.2015.Ralfs Vīlands
Synergy
The Interlex Group2015 European Regional meeting
... We all serve business but have different tasks and therefore methods
Brand protection Conflict/Crises/
Public pressure
Content of the presentation - Synergy
Brand protection
PR is a strategy Legal counsel is a
tactic
In brand protection
Lawyer
... Protects legal body(exact values, very formalized)
Communication
... Protects brand(public opinion, game of values)
Aim of Communications is to increase value of the brand - tangible and non-tangible asset
While dealing with different issues, we should never forget about the big picture
In brand protection II
Value exchange via interaction
Brand
Employees
Clients
Suppliers
Neighbours
Opinion leaders
Media
Brand is like an elephant in a porcelain shop
Brand reputation is
Corporate values
Society valuesDistance in between
Logic of business vs Logic of media
Big is good Small is good
Rational is goodEmotional is
good
Dialogue Conflict
Confidentiality Transparency
FactsOpinion/Narrative
Detailed explanation
Colorful details
Synergy in crises and conflictPublic pressure
Communication crisis becomes a large crisis when lawyers are leading the process
In Court
... Everybody is equal, the evidence speaks for itself
In Public Court
... Asymmetrical power of small groups
PR and legal counsel have an equal role
Lawyers – we need to win it
We need to win it (public pressure), but what others will say about it?
In times of crises or conflict
IT company attacked high-school student who programmed add-on for e-class (a product of the IT company). With help of an international law firm the company sent letter to his parrents and visited him at home
From the legal point everything was correct
When PR is not involved
Was used inadequately large power Company attacked its client who had good
intentions Company tried to stop publicly accepted step
towards innovations and progress IT company against young programmer – what
was the signal sent by them to other students?
Sometimes legaly correct steps cause damage for the brand
The result was public anger and sarcasm. What did go wrong?
If a legal position is not strong enough, conflict usually moves to the public space
False, one-sided, supposedly credible narrative is more vivid in public space than a strong position from a legal standpoint
Public presure in conflict. Hybrid war
The small has a better position even if the position is false
Small against big
Lawyers: our position is correct - so why they are not publising all the facts? Let’s supply them with full information!
For lawyers each detail matters
In communication matters a narrative with whom the audience can self-identify
Public presure in conflict. Hybrid war
Please remember one issue where you have been involved this year!
Public presure in conflict. Hybrid war
And now retell it in the “elevator pitch”!
Public presure in conflict. Hybrid war
Institutions start to act when they realize that the public knows
Our aim is to increase importance of an issue for the public
Public presure in conflict. Hybrid war
Financial system against fraudulent insolvencies
Pretkorupciju.lv
Public pressure
2013 Rey Routh kills Chris Kyle
Public pressure
2014 Clint Eastwood’s movie American Sniper
2015 Feb 25. Texas jury finds Rey Routh guilty
Importance of quotes
Importance of quotes
Any questions?
Thank you for your attention!