switch studies in virologically suppressed patients
DESCRIPTION
Switch studies in virologically suppressed patients. Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI266-073 Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen SWAN SLOAT Switch to ATV-containing regimen ARIES INDUMA Switch to ATV/r monotherapy - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Pilot LPV/r M03-613 LPV/r Mono KalMo OK OK04 KALESOLO MOST HIV-NAT 077
Design
Endpoints– Primary: proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at W96
(ITT-exposed, previous-failure = failure analysis) ; 80% power to detect a difference of 25% in response rate
– Secondary: lipoatrophy (> 20% loss in limb fat) at W96 ; 70% power to detect a 20% difference in the mean change in limb fat percentage
LPV/r 400/100 mg bid + ZDV/3TC
EFV 600 mg QD + ZDV/3TC
Randomisation2 : 1
Open-label
Randomisation2 : 1
Open-label
HIV+, ARV-naïveHIV-1 RNA > 1000 c/mL
Any CD4 cell countNo documented resistance
HIV+, ARV-naïveHIV-1 RNA > 1000 c/mL
Any CD4 cell countNo documented resistance N = 51
N = 104
W96W96
Cameron DW, JID 2008;198:234-40M03-613M03-613
* Patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL on 3 consecutive measures between W24 and W48 discontinued ZDV/3TC and remained on LPV/r monotherapy
M03-613 Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
LPV/r 400/100 mg bid monotherapy
*
79% of patients were male
65% were white
Mean age was 38 years
Mean baseline HIV-1 RNA was 4.9 log10 c/mL
Patients in the LPV/r group had a higher mean baseline HIV-1 RNA and a higher mean age
112 patients (57% in the LPV/r group and 69% in the EFV group) completed their assigned treatment regimen out to week 96
In the LPV/r group, after a median of 24 weeks, 92 patients (88%) simplified to LPV/r monotherapy
Cameron DW, JID 2008;198:234-40M03-613M03-613
M03-613 Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Baseline characteristics and patient disposition
Outcome at week 96
* Confirmed virologic failure before W96 andreintensified therapy with NRTIs were ignored
EFV + ZDV/3TC
LPV/rmono
Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL after 72 weeks post-simplification
91%
57%(Kaplan-
Meier estimate, p < 0.001)
Confirmed virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA > 500 c/mL)
-
N = 124/7 achieved HIV-1 RNA< 50 c/mL after NRTI
intensification
Mean change in CD4/mm3 at W96 + 240 + 289
(p = 0.12)
Development of resistance
to EFV, N = 1
to PI, N = 4(3 on LPV/r mono*, 1 on
LPV/r + ZDV+3TC*)
Cameron DW, JID 2008;198:234-40M03-613M03-613
M03-613 Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
EFV LPV/r mono
ITT-E Non completion= failure analysis*
63 60
%
0
20
40
60
80
100
95% CI for the difference =- 29% ; 4%
61
48
95% CI for the difference =- 19% ; 13%
HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL
HIV-1 RNA< 50 c/mL
* major PI mutations in all 4 cases
Cameron DW, JID 2008;198:234-40M03-613M03-613
M03-613 Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
%
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 16 32 48 64 80 96
Weeks
%
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 16 32 48 64 80 96
Weeks
HIV-1 RNA > 500 copies/mL
HIV-1 RNA 50-500 copies/mL
HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL
Discontinued LPV/r or EFV
LPV/r EFV
HIV-1 RNA level and discontinuation status, by visit, through 96 weeks
Cameron DW, JID 2008;198:234-40M03-613M03-613
M03-613 Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
-50
-25
0
25
50
75
100
-40 0 40 80 120
Lipoatrophy(p < 0.001)
Lipohypertrophy
LPV/r (N = 74)EFV (N = 32)
% c
han
ge
in l
imb
fat
at
wee
k 9
6
% change in trunk fat at week 96
Median percent change from baseline in limb fat and trunk fat
Scatter plot of percent change from baseline to W96 in limb fat vs trunk fat
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
0 24 48 72 96
EFV limb fat
LPV/r trunk fat
EFV trunk fat
LPV/r limb fat
Weeks
*
* p < 0.001
*
Most common (frequency > 5%) moderate or severe adverse events related to treatment– LPV/r monotherapy group
• Diarhoea: 15%• Nausea: 14%
– EFV group• Asthenia: 12% • Dizziness: 12%• Insomnia: 12%• Rash: 10%• Depression: 6%
Most frequent grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities– LPV/r monotherapy group
• Total cholesterol > 7.8 mmol/L: 12% ; Triglycerides > 8.5 mmol/L: 7%• Amylase > 2 ULN: 6%
– EFV group• Amylase > 5 ULN: 10%• ALAT > 5 ULN: 6%
Adverse events
Cameron DW, JID 2008;198:234-40M03-613M03-613
M03-613 Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Conclusions– LPV/r monotherapy was less effective than EFV + ZDV/3TC
in maintaining virologic suppression: time to confirmed virologic rebound was shorter with LPV/r monotherapy
– Lipoatrophy was significantly lower in the LPV/r monotherapy group
Cameron DW, JID 2008;198:234-40M03-613M03-613
M03-613 Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy