swiss day presentation on us program - iea 4e · pdf fileheat and power residential water...
TRANSCRIPT
1 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
The Parker Ranch installation in Hawaii
Swiss Day Presentation on US Program
US Appliance and Equipment Efficiency Standards and Energy Star Labels
20 May 2011
Mark Friedrichs
United States Department of Energy
Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
2 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
US Building Energy Use and Carbon Emissions
38% of U.S. Carbon Emissions
72% of U.S. Electricity Consumption
54% of U.S. Natural Gas Consumption
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
(Qua
ds)
Total U.S. Energy Consumption
Industry &
Transportation
997 MMTC
(62%)
Buildings
610 MMTC
(38%)
21%
18%
33%
28%
Industry
Residential
Commercial
Transportation
Sources: BED 2009; AEO 2010
39% of U.S. Primary Energy Consumption
3 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
EERE Technologies – Potential Carbon Abatement
Coal power
plants – CCS
rebuilds with
EOR
Coal power plant –
CCS new builds
with EOR
2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.80.6
100
150
0.4
-100
-150
-200
-250
50
-50
Cost$2005/ton CO2e
0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00.2 2.42.2 2.60.8
VolumeGt/year
0
Source: December 2008 analysis conducted by EERE with McKinsey using
2008 DOE technology performance projections; mid-range case
EERE Energy efficiency
EERE Transport
EERE Power
DOE Nuclear/CCS
Cars fuel economy packages
Light trucks fuel economy packages
Cars Hybridization
Light Trucks Hybridization
Residential electronics
Commercial
electronics
Residential buildings – lighting
Residential buildings –
new shell improvements
Commercial
LED
Commercial
buildings –
New shell
improvements
Commercial
buildings –
CFL lighting
Biofuels cellulosic
Control systems
Commercial buildings – combined
heat and power
Residential
buildings –
Shell retrofits
Power plant
conversion
efficiency
improvements
Industry –
combined
heat and
power
Residential
water heaters
Industrial
process
improvement
Coal mining -
CH4
Hydro-
thermal
Enhanced
geothermal
systems
Manufacturing -
HFCs
Existing hydro
efficiency
gains
Existing hydro capacity
increases
Natural gas and petroleum
systems management
Residential windows
new build
Nuclear
Cars Plug-In
Hybridization
Afforestation -
pastureland
Solar CSP
Land-based
wind
Reforestation
New hydro in
existing dams
Biomass
cofiring
Afforestation –
cropland
Distributed
PV
Commercial
HVAC
equipment
efficiency
Coal power
plant – CCS
new builds
Industry – CCS
new builds on
carbon-intensive
processes
Offshore wind
Coal power
plant – CCS
rebuilds
Residential
HVAC
equipment
efficiency
Coal-to-gas
existing plants
Car Hydrogen
Fuel Cell
Vehicles
28
10
17
9
1421
Industrial
TransportPower
DOE Nuclear/CCS
Non-DOE
Buildings
Technology Share of Abatement Volume
%
Coal power
plants – CCS
rebuilds with
EOR
Coal power plant –
CCS new builds
with EOR
2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.80.6
100
150
0.4
-100
-150
-200
-250
50
-50
Cost$2005/ton CO2e
0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00.2 2.42.2 2.60.8
VolumeGt/year
0
Source: December 2008 analysis conducted by EERE with McKinsey using
2008 DOE technology performance projections; mid-range case
EERE Energy efficiency
EERE Transport
EERE Power
DOE Nuclear/CCS
EERE Energy efficiencyEERE Energy efficiency
EERE TransportEERE Transport
EERE PowerEERE Power
DOE Nuclear/CCSDOE Nuclear/CCS
Cars fuel economy packages
Light trucks fuel economy packages
Cars Hybridization
Light Trucks Hybridization
Residential electronics
Commercial
electronics
Residential buildings – lighting
Residential buildings –
new shell improvements
Commercial
LED
Commercial
buildings –
New shell
improvements
Commercial
buildings –
CFL lighting
Biofuels cellulosic
Control systems
Commercial buildings – combined
heat and power
Residential
buildings –
Shell retrofits
Power plant
conversion
efficiency
improvements
Industry –
combined
heat and
power
Residential
water heaters
Industrial
process
improvement
Coal mining -
CH4
Hydro-
thermal
Enhanced
geothermal
systems
Manufacturing -
HFCs
Existing hydro
efficiency
gains
Existing hydro capacity
increases
Natural gas and petroleum
systems management
Residential windows
new build
Nuclear
Cars Plug-In
Hybridization
Afforestation -
pastureland
Solar CSP
Land-based
wind
Reforestation
New hydro in
existing dams
Biomass
cofiring
Afforestation –
cropland
Distributed
PV
Commercial
HVAC
equipment
efficiency
Coal power
plant – CCS
new builds
Industry – CCS
new builds on
carbon-intensive
processes
Offshore wind
Coal power
plant – CCS
rebuilds
Residential
HVAC
equipment
efficiency
Coal-to-gas
existing plants
Car Hydrogen
Fuel Cell
Vehicles
28
10
17
9
1421
Industrial
TransportPower
DOE Nuclear/CCS
Non-DOE
Buildings
Technology Share of Abatement Volume
%
Energy efficiency
measures represent most
of the no-cost options
BTP believes opportunities
for Buildings are even
greater than predicted
4 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
Strategies
R&D
- Advance innovative technologies for appliances, equipment, and
products
- Integrated buildings approaches
Market Priming
- Pull new products, practices
and services into market faster
at scale - Technical support to ENERGY
STAR / new higher tier
Codes & Standards
- Leverage market priming and advanced technologies
- Broaden coverage and update frequently to capture savings opportunities
Increasing Energy Efficiency (Metrics)
Nu
mb
er o
f U
nit
Sal
es
5 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
US Building Energy Efficiency Priorities
• More stringent product efficiency standards; stronger
enforcement; more products
• Stronger, more widely used building codes
• Incentives for efficiency and renewable energy
investments
• Building rating and labeling systems
• Stronger ENERGY STAR program
• Enhanced research
Buildings and Appliances
6 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
Appliance and Equipment Standards – Upgrade and
7 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
Minimum Energy Performance Standards and Energy Star Labels
US Minimum Energy (and Water) Efficiency Standards:
• 45-50 different product categories
• Residential, Commercial and Industrial
• Remaining opportunities
– TV’s and Other Electronic Equipment
– Other Commercial and Industrial Equipment
– Regular updates of existing standards
US Energy Star labels (high efficiency/performance products):
• About 60 products
• Mainly energy using products purchased by consumers
• Some commercial products and some building types or components
• Remaining opportunities: mainly regular updates
8 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
Standards and Labeling Development Processes
For Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards:
• Legislative or Regulatory pathways
• US Congress enacts new energy laws every 3-10 years (last 2007)
• Regulatory process based on existing laws, but can result in new or
updated efficiency standards
Regulatory process for new or updated standards:
• Takes 2-3 years
• Costs $1-3 million per product technology, market, economic and
environmental analysis
• 2-3 opportunities for public review and comment
Energy Star process new or updated labeling-specifications:
• Less than one year; much lower cost
• Web-based review and comment
9 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
Criteria for Setting Standards
Maximum Energy Efficiency that is Technologically Feasible
and Economically Justified
Economic Justification: Benefits must exceed burdens, considering:
• Net National Benefits
• Impacts on Consumer Life Cycle Costs
• Impacts on Manufacturers
• Impacts on Competition
• Impacts on Energy Security/Reliability
• Impacts on the Environment, including estimates of monetary value
of benefits from reducing CO2 and other emissions
• Other factors
10 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
Recent Progress
• DOE has issued eight energy conservation standards since
President Obama took office that established or amended standards
for:
1. 14 Products with standards prescribed by 2007 energy law
2. Ranges and Ovens
3. GSFL and IRL Lamps
4. Commercial Package Boilers and Very Large Commercial Package AC & HP
5. Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machines
6. Commercial Clothes Washers
7. Small Electric Motors
8. Heating Products (water heaters, direct heating equipment, pool heaters)
• Between 2010 and 2030 the eight appliance standards issued since
the Obama administration took office could save consumers over
$261 billion dollars off their utility bills, which is more than what
residential consumers spend on energy bills for an entire year.
11 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
Future Progress
DOE is scheduled to complete final rules for another 12 products over the next 10 months
• Twelve Products with Final Rules in 2011 Refrigerators
Microwave Ovens
Residential Furnaces and Mobile Home Furnaces
Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts
Clothes Dryers (Residential)
Room Air Conditioners
Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps (Residential)
Battery Chargers
External Power Supplies (Class A)
ER, BR, and Small Diameter Incandescent Reflector Lamps
Residential Clothes Washers
Dishwashers
• The standards that will be issued in the next 15 months (9 rulemakings, 12 appliances) could save consumers approximately the same amount as the eight final rules issued to date.
12 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
US Standards Enforcement Program has gone from $0 to $10
million per year in just three years
•The Appliance Standards verification testing program will ensure the integrity and
effectiveness of energy usage standards.
Accurate energy usage labeling
Energy performance that meets or exceeds the minimum energy usage
standards
•The verification and enforcement program will test a statistically significant
number of basic models and verify manufacturer certifications of the efficiency or
energy use ratings of their appliances.
•If a product that has been tested fails verification testing for the minimum energy
usage standard, DOE will follow the enforcement regulations as stated in the Code
of Federal Register.
Verification Testing and Enforcement
13 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
Long-term savings are set by pace of innovation
Projected US energy consumption in the residential, commercial and industrial sectors, under 3 scenarios: base case, accelerated rulemaking case, and adding ongoing innovation.
• BTP analyzed the impact of mandatory and discretionary standards on US energy consumption in the residential, commercial and industrial sectors.
• The accelerated rulemakings case shows the impact from all these standards.
• The continuing-innovation case assumes standards are updated every 7 years with similar benefits. This would require continuing technology innovation.
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
Re
s/C
om
/In
d E
ne
rgy U
se
(q
ua
ds
)
Year
Base Case
Impact of 2010-2017 Accelerated Rulemakings
Continuing Innovation/Activity Case
14 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov -- Page 14 --
How fast can Energy Use and LCC
sustainably decline over the long term?
LCC = (1+b) * P ; i.e. LCC declines w/Price and
(1/UEC)*dUEC/dt = -a/(1+b) ; i.e. Energy declines are related to price declines
Under economic optimization LCC, Price and UEC are all
“relative”
LCC is life-cycle cost of a product,
P is quality-adjusted first cost,
UEC is the unit energy use of a product,
b is the negative price elasticity w.r.t. energy use
(i.e. b = -[(dP/P)/(dUEC/UEC)]); and
a is the annual average unregulated quality-adjusted equipment price
decline relative to the price of energy.
15 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov -- Page 15 --
We came to this conclusion by studying refrigerators
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025
En
erg
y U
se
(k
Wh
/yr)
o
r R
ea
l P
ric
e in
(2
00
9$
)
Year shipped
Annual Energy Use, Volume, and Real Price of New Refrigerators
1978 CA Standard
1980 CA Standard
1987 CA Standard 1990 NAECA Standard
1993 DOE Standard
2001 DOE Standard
2014 Consensus Proposal
Refrigerator Adjusted Volume
50-year Declining Real Price Trend
1978 CA Standard
1980 CA Standard
1987 CA Standard 1990 NAECA Standard
1993 DOE Standard
2001 DOE Standard
2014 Consensus Proposal
Refrigerator Adjusted Volume
50-year Declining Real Price Trend
1978 CA Standard
1980 CA Standard
1987 CA Standard 1990 NAECA Standard
1993 DOE Standard
2001 DOE Standard
2014 Consensus Proposal
Refrigerator Adjusted Volume
50-year Declining Real Price Trend
1978 CA Standard
1980 CA Standard
1987 CA Standard 1990 NAECA Standard
1993 DOE Standard
2001 DOE Standard
2014 Consensus Proposal
Refrigerator Adjusted Volume
50-year Declining Real Price Trend
Ad
juste
d V
olu
me
(cu ft)
16 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov -- Page 16 --
These improvements have not increased costs –
In fact, they’ve accelerated decline in life cycle cost
R² = 0.9642
R² = 0.7763
$100.00
$1,000.00
$10,000.00
10 100 1000
Ref
rige
rato
r LC
C in
Re
al D
olla
rs (
20
09
$)
US Cumulative Refrigerator Shipments (millions)
Pre-Standards
Historical Standards 1978-2010
17 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov -- Page 17 --
In Europe, we can watch the efficiency/cost curve
change over time
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Euro
pe
an R
efr
ige
rato
r Pri
ce (E
uro
s--n
om
inal
)
Annual Energy Use (kWh/year)
18 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov -- Page 18 --
Historically in the US we see differences in energy vs. equipment price trends
0.125
0.250
0.500
1.000
2.000
4.000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Major Household Appliances Electricity Natural Gas
Water and Sewer Small Appliances Lamps, Clocks and Fixtures
Tools, hardware and supplies Gasoline
19 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov -- Page 19 --
This difference in historical price indices for electricity and electronics equipment is even bigger
0.001
0.004
0.016
0.063
0.250
1.000
4.000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Televisions ElectricityAudio Equipment Information Processing EquipmentPhotographic Equipment
20 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov -- Page 20 --
We can also calculate what might happen with a small
change in economic optimization
0
700
1400
2100
2800
3500
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Ene
rgy
Use
(kW
h/y
ear
)
Re
frig
era
tor
Co
st in
Re
al D
olla
rs (
20
09
$)
Year
Life-Cycle Cost
21 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov
International Initiatives
• Super-efficient Equipment and Appliance Deployment initiative
• APEC ESIS appliance and equipment efficiency standards and labeling-related activities
• 4E Implementing Agreement [SSL annex; Mapping and Benchmarking]
• US-EU energy efficiency standards and labeling cooperation
• Increased emphasis on assessment of non-U.S. test procedures and efficiency in regulations development process
22 | Building Technologies Program eere.energy.gov 22
Contact and Additional Information
• Additional Web based information for: Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards -
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards
Notices and Rules -
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/notices_rules.html
The history of the reports to congress can be seen at –
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/schedule_setting.html