sustainable water management plan - city of kwinana · opportunity to reduce water use in these...
TRANSCRIPT
Sustainable Water Management Plan
(2018-2023)September 2018
2
Contents Page
Introduction and context 4Why act on sustainable water management? 5Water consumption data 7Water quality data 11Community Education and Engagement 12Water management goals 13Implementation plan 14Monitoring and review 20References 20Appendix A Sustainable Water Management Plan 2013-2017 actions and progress 21
3
Introduction and contextOur water resources and systems are under increasing pressure from population growth and climate change. These dual pressures are reducing water availability, increasing flood risk and degrading wetland environments.
Local governments have a responsibility to manage water systems to meet these challenges in an environmentally responsible way while, at the same time, enhancing the livability and resilience of the City. This approach has been encapsulated in the term “Water Sensitive Cities” (CRC for Water Sensitive Cities, 2018). This concept encompasses water management in all parts of the water cycle as they are closely related and interconnected. A Water Sensitive City considers the following:
• Stormwater quality treatment,
• Reducing scheme and groundwater use,
• Reuse of alternative water sources such as wastewater,
• Protection of waterway health,
• Reducing urban heat, and
• Mitigating flood risk.
In doing this, a Water Sensitive City will also consider the many other objectives a local government has for public open space and infrastructure. In particular, providing useable and beautiful public areas and supporting local biodiversity. The CRC for Water Sensitive Cities has encapsulated this in seven goals which are;
• Ensure Good Water Sensitive Governance,
• Increase Community Capital,
• Improve Productivity and Resource Efficiency,
• Improve Ecological Health,
• Ensure Quality Urban Space,
• Achieve Equity of Essential Services, and
• Promote Adaptive Infrastructure. (CRC for Water Sensitive Cities, 2018).
In 2013 the City of Kwinana adopted a Sustainable Water Management Plan (City of Kwinana, 2013) to outline how the City would move towards becoming a Water Sensitive City.
In that time the City has gained experience in implementing water management projects and best practice has evolved. It is now appropriate to review the plan in light of this experience in order to continue to improve the City’s water management. The actions from the previous plan are listed in Appendix A along with notes explaining the City’s progress towards their implementation.
This review was completed over six months in the first half of 2018. It involved;
1. Collating and analysing the City’s most recent water data.
2. Reviewing current best practice.
3. Assessing the City’s performance against the previous plan.
4. Checking each of the measures originally proposed to determine if they had been completed or were no longer appropriate.
5. Determining new priorities and actions.
Rather than addressing the entire suite of issues addressed by the Water Sensitive Cities framework, issues were prioritised that were most relevant to the City and practical actions selected to address these issues. This was done as part of a review meeting held on 22 March 2018 with staff from across the City’s departments. Further input was sought from relevant staff who were unable to attend.
4
Why act on sustainable water management? The City has recognised its responsibility to act on sustainable water management. The latest review of the Strategic Community Plan (City of Kwinana, 2017) completed in 2017 includes the following objective.
Objective 3.4 Encourage and exercise best practice water management
The City also participates in the Waterwise Council Program run by the Water Corporation and the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (Water Corporation, 2018). This program involves an annual re-accreditation process where the City must address a series of Waterwise criteria and report on our water management activities. This program is aligned with the Water Sensitive Cities approach and Councils must report on each of the seven goals. The City has
been accredited as a Waterwise Council under this program and has achieved the higher Gold Waterwise Council status for two years in a row. The criteria for the Waterwise Council program has been incorporated into this plan.
WATER ISSUES IN THE CITY OF KWINANA
When considering the best course of action it is important to assess what the major water issues and priorities for the City are. These are described below.
WATER AVAILABILITY
Rapid population growth and increasing groundwater extraction are depleting the quality and availability of our scheme and groundwater resources. Climate Change is likely to result in further decline in rainfall over the South West of Western Australia. (Department of Water, 2009). Figure 1 below illustrates the rapid reduction in run-off to dams in the south-west over the last 30 years.
Figure 1 Yearly streamflow for major surface water sources (source: the Water Corporation)
5
The availability of groundwater is similarly declining. Many aquifers are now reaching their licensed abstraction limits and many new subdivisions are refused a new groundwater allocation by the Department of Water (Department of Water, 2009).
This reduction in both scheme and groundwater availability means we will no longer enjoy the easy access to cheap water for our pools, parks and gardens that has been enjoyed in the past. We must adapt and innovate if we are to maintain our community facilities to a level the community expects.
This is particularly relevant to the irrigation of the City’s parks and gardens which rely on groundwater for irrigation. The City also owns a large number of buildings and facilities that use scheme water including the Recquatic and Kwinana Adventure Park. There is the opportunity to reduce water use in these facilities through retrofits and leak detection.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Wetlands and other natural environments are affected when the quality of water flowing into them changes. Water flowing into a wetland may come from stormwater and groundwater from a large surrounding area encompassing suburbs, roads and industry. Anything that falls on the ground in those areas (fertilisers, sediment, heavy metals, oil, petrol, herbicides etc) is transported by the stormwater and, if it is not treated, can end up in groundwater, wetlands, the ocean and in some areas of Kwinana the Peel Main Drain, which feeds the Peel Harvey estuary (Department of Water 2004).
These pollutants can cause a range of problems. For example;.
• Sediment can smother vegetation, transport toxic pollutants and block stormwater infrastructure.
• Fertilisers can build up in water bodies causing algal blooms (Department of Water 2004).
The City has an opportunity to address these problems by installing treatment measures in our existing stormwater infrastructure and by implementing Water Sensitive Urban Design in our new developments. This approach uses urban planning and design to attenuate stormwater high in the landscape, stopping it from picking up pollutants and reaching our waterways (Melbourne Water, 2018).
This can be achieved by reducing the amount of piped stormwater infrastructure and infiltrating and treating rain high in the catchment with swales, raingardens, rainwater tanks, gross pollutant traps, street trees and sediment ponds. It also involves restoring wetland habitats to improve their ability to filter stormwater.
Water Sensitive Urban Design in new developments is informed by Better Urban Water Management (WAPC and Department of Planning and Infrastructure 2008). This document provides guidance on the implementation of State Planning Policy 2.9 Water Resources (Government of WA, 2006). It is also supported by Liveable Neighbourhoods under Objective 6 – Ensure that water is protected and managed to maximise efficiency by incorporation of urban water management techniques into the urban design (Department of Planning, 2015).
LITTER
Litter was identified specifically as a priority water issue. Illegal dumping, litter from building sites and general public place litter all make their way into reserves and wetlands and eventually into local waterways and the ocean. Plastic litter in particular never biodegrades which makes it easier for it to be washed into waterways where animals mistake it for food or become entangled (Australian Marine Conservation Society, 2018). The City has the opportunity to address illegal dumping and building site management through our local laws and compliance as well as adapting stormwater infrastructure to collect litter.
6
Water consumption dataBaseline data on both water consumption and water quality within the City has been collected and is presented below. This data allows the City to identify the highest priority areas for action.
Figure 2 above indicates the City’s total scheme water consumption over the past seven years. During this time consumption has varied from between 30,000KL to over 45,000KL per annum. Water use varies naturally due to weather conditions, user behavior and leaks. Calculating a trend line (to account for these variables) indicates that consumption has decreased by approximately 15% over this time.
The dip in consumption around 2014/15 and 2015/16 may have been partially due to the Recquatic closing for refurbishment and the increase in 2016/17 due to the re-opening of the Recquatic and the opening of the Kwinana Adventure Park which includes a Splash Pad.
It could be expected that consumption could rise again next year as the Adventure Park only opened part way through the 2016/17 financial year. Water efficiency measures have been implemented but the majority of these took effect in 2015/16 and 2016/17. These measures may have mitigated potential increases over this time. The cost of water has also increased over this time with the City now spending nearly $90,000 on water each year. The cost per KL has increased from $1.33 to $2.18 in that time.
Figure 3 below is per capita scheme water consumption (by City operations) per resident.
Figure 2 Scheme water consumption
7
This graph indicates that the consumption has declined significantly per capita over this time, by approximately 40%.
Figure 3 Operations scheme water consumption per capita
Figure 4 Scheme water consumption breakdown (2016/17)
8
Figure 4 above demonstrates that the City’s highest scheme water consumers are Retirement Villages (Banksia Park and Callistemon Court), Recreation Centres and Function and Community Centres.
Figure 5 Top 10 scheme water consuming sites
Figure 5 above shows this data broken down further into the top 10 consuming accounts. The high consuming sites listed above will be targeted for water conservation measures.
PROGRESS TO DATE
The City has undertaken a range of actions and policies in the area of sustainable water management over the past five years as part of the Sustainable Water Management Plan (2013-2018).
Scheme water efficiency measures include:
• Water monitoring and leak detection – 10 buildings have been fitted with water data loggers and a real time monitoring system has been installed at the Recquatic. These have picked up several large leaks saving approximately 12 million litres of water.
• Public Toilet Retrofit - Inefficient toilets and urinals were replaced at Sloan’s Reserve, Rhodes Park, Medina Oval and Challenger Beach.
• Administration Building and Depot water efficiency retrofit – Water efficient toilets, flow restrictors, sub-meters and low flow showerheads were installed at the Depot and the Administration Building. This saves approximately 900,000 litres of water per year.
• Green Building Policy (new and renovated buildings) - adopted by Council in January 2018. This policy includes water efficiency requirements for new and renovated buildings.
9
Figure 6 Groundwater abstraction
Figure 6 above displays the City’s groundwater data for the previous 8 years. The trendline indicates that groundwater consumption has decreased by approximately 15% or 90 million litres over that time.
Figure 7 below indicates groundwater consumption per hectare. This demonstrates that despite the City’s growth there has been significant reductions in consumption of over 40% per hectare.
Figure 7 Groundwater abstraction per irrigated hectare
10
This has been due to work undertaken as part of the City’s Groundwater Strategy (2014-2019). The majority of this work has now been done and it is likely that the rate of improvement in water efficiency may now slow down unless there are further advances in best practice.
Groundwater efficiency measures include:
• Centralised Irrigation Control which allows for detailed water budgeting based on the quality of turf or garden required and seasonal conditions. 63% of the City’s bores are now attached to this central controller.
• Reviewed the Irrigation Development Guidelines (City of Kwinana, 2014) for new developments to ensure irrigation systems which are handed over to the City are water efficient and compatible with the City’s systems.
• Replacement of particularly poorly performing irrigation systems at Calista Oval and the Administration Centre.
Water quality dataA simple and cost effective method for identifying priority water quality actions is to collate a map of water quality “hotspots” in the area. It also allows a visual summary of water quality issues specifically relevant to the City. The information has been taken from the City’s Intramaps database (stormwater infrastructure), Groundwater Operating Strategy (monitoring bores) and Department of Water Spatial Services for the Peel Main Drain and catchment boundary. The map is provided in Figure 8 on the following page.
The map notes the location of the Peel Harvey Catchment Boundary and the Peel Main Drain. The area within the catchment and adjacent to the main drain should be targeted for water quality interventions as they are in the catchment for the Peel Harvey Estuary, an important environment which suffers many water quality issues. Particular care should be taken with development in this area to minimise nutrient export in accordance with State Planning Policy 2.1 Peel Harvey Coastal Plain Catchment (WAPC,2003).
The City’s wetlands are also indicated to demonstrate the role they play in treating stormwater and attenuating floods. These wetlands should be protected and rehabilitated to enhance this function.
The map also identifies pollutant sources such as sites where litter is generated (such as shopping centres, new developments and train stations) and stormwater infrastructure in reserves with no water quality treatment. This identifies several sites where gross pollutant traps or similar litter and sediment attenuation devices should be installed to prevent litter and sediment entering natural environments. Building sites can also be targeted for verge permit compliance campaigns and education.
The City has undertaken a range of actions and policies in the area of water quality over the past five years including;
• Water Sensitive Urban Design at the Kwinana Adventure Park - The Kwinana Adventure Park project included the installation of four raingardens (gardens which filter stormwater).
• Local Planning Policy No 1 Landscape Feature and Tree Retention – this planning policy aims to retain vegetation in new development sites which assists with stormwater attenuation and treatment.
• Builders litter and illegal dumping project - Keep Australia Beautiful funding was sourced to tackle illegal dumping and builders litter in Millar Wellard reserve. This project included the installation of two covert cameras, two litter cleanups, signage and a letter drop to neighbours encouraging them to report littering.
• Participation in Clean Up Australia Day.
• An ongoing program to tackle illegal dumping including covert cameras, restricting access to known hotspots and enforcement.
• Encouraging developers to include Water Sensitive Urban Design in new developments. This has been particularly important in areas with multiple water related constraints in the Peel Harvey Catchment.
• Ongoing restoration of the City’s wetlands through weed control and planting with appropriate endemic species.
11
Figure 8. Water quality hotspots in the City of Kwinana
Community Education and EngagementThe City can also play a role in educating the community about water conservation and quality issues by delivering education and engagement programs. Existing initiatives include;
• Adopt a Verge Program - This program encourages residents to plant a local native waterwise garden on their verge. This involves free mulch, subsidised local native seedlings through the existing seedling subsidy scheme, a verge gardening tips document, advice and a Verge Gardening Workshop (in 2017 only) where free soil conditioner and soil wetter was handed out to participants.
• Living Smart Sustainable Living Courses – a seven week sustainable living course for residents has been delivered annually for the past 3 years. This course includes modules on home water efficiency and water efficient gardening.
• Switch Your Thinking – The City recently joined Switch Your Thinking, a regional organisation of Councils that delivers sustainability programs to the public. As part of this the City receives public education workshops, access to the Rewards for Residents and Rewards for Businesses program, recognition programs like Switched on Schools and Switched on Businesses, Competitions such as the Young Reinventor of the Year program as well as other grant funded projects.
• Participation in Clean Up Australia Day.
12
An environmental education strategy will be completed by the City in the 2018/19 financial year. This will incorporate broader sustainability issues, not just water. These existing water education initiatives may be included and expanded on in this strategy.
Water management goalsWithin the Water Sensitive Cities Index further detailed SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, results oriented and timebound) goals are required in some cases.
For the Improve Productivity and Resource Efficiency objective, quantifiable water conservation goals are able to be set. The following water goals were discussed at a meeting held on 22 March 2018 attended by representatives from Engineering, Environment, Assets, Recreational Services and Parks.
The base year of 2016/17 was chosen as the most recent financial year with a full set of data. The target year, 2023, aligns with the expiry of this plan. The percentage reductions were chosen because they were believed to be achievable based on the actions chosen. It should be noted that these goals are intended to be something to strive for and there will be no penalties if the City fails to achieve them.
SCHEME WATER GOAL
To reduce scheme water consumption by 5% on 2016/17 levels by 2023.
To achieve this goal the City would need to save approximately 2,000KL each year. The major actions proposed in this plan which will directly save scheme water are leak detection and retrofits at the Recquatic as part of the Waterwise Aquatic Centre program. The savings from leak detection vary greatly from year to year but based on past experience expanding the current leak detection system alone is likely to achieve this goal.
GROUNDWATER GOAL
Maintain groundwater abstraction at 2016/17 levels until 2023.
The City has been progressively improving water budgeting over several years as well as transferring bores to the centralised controller. This work will be completed over the coming years. The rate of improvement in efficiency of groundwater abstraction is therefore likely to plateau. At the same time the City will take over management of a large number of parks situated in new subdivisions. Climate change will put further pressure on the City to increase irrigation over the summer months. Given all of the above trends this will be an ambitious but achievable goal.
For the following remaining Water Sensitive Cities Index goals it is more difficult to set quantifiable SMART goals;
• Ensure Good Water Sensitive Governance,
• Increase Community Capital,
• Improve Ecological Health,
• Ensure Quality Urban Space,
• Achieve Equity of Essential Services,
• Promote Adaptive Infrastructure. (CRC for Water Sensitive Cities, 2018).
For the above goals this action plan lists a series of actions against each. The objective of this plan is therefore to achieve each of the listed actions.
13
Implementation planThe actions and priorities in this list may vary as circumstances and technologies change and funding opportunities become available. Actions that relate to the Waterwise Councils accreditation are noted under the relevant action. Each action is identified as new or existing to identify actions that have been carried forward from the previous plan. The actions are categorised according to the Water Sensitive City Index Goals.
14
WA
TER
SEN
SITI
VE C
ITY
IND
EX G
OA
L - I
MPR
OVE
PRO
DU
CTIV
ITY
AN
D R
ESO
URC
E EF
FICI
ENCY
REF.
ACT
ION
RESP
ON
SIBI
LITY
TIM
EFRA
ME
BUD
GET
MEA
SURE
OF
SUCC
ESS
1*N
EW*
Part
icip
ate
in th
e W
ater
wis
e Aq
uatic
Cen
tre
Prog
ram
(Req
uire
men
t of W
ater
wis
e Co
unci
ls
Prog
ram
). Th
is in
clud
es:
Cond
uctin
g a
wat
er a
udit
of th
e Re
cqua
tic C
entr
e to
de
term
ine
oppo
rtun
ities
for
redu
cing
wat
er u
se.
Retr
ofitt
ing
appl
ianc
es to
red
uce
wat
er u
se.
Util
isin
g re
al ti
me
mon
itori
ng to
qui
ckly
iden
tify
leak
s.
Recr
eatio
n Se
rvic
es,
Envi
ronm
ent
2019
/20
$2,0
00
(aud
it)
Cost
for
retr
ofitt
ing
to b
e de
term
ined
in
aud
it.
Redu
ctio
n in
wat
er u
se. T
o be
qu
antifi
ed a
s pa
rt o
f aud
it.
2*N
EW*
Cont
inue
to in
stal
l dat
a lo
gger
s on
all
Coun
cil
wat
er m
eter
s fo
r le
ak d
etec
tion
purp
oses
. Th
ere
are
27 a
ccou
nts
rem
aini
ng to
hav
e a
logg
er in
stal
led
this
eq
uate
s to
, on
aver
age,
6 in
stal
led
per
year
.
Envi
ronm
ent
Com
plet
ed
by
2022
/202
3
$35,
100
(tota
l cos
t)
$9,0
00 p
er
year
.
Redu
ctio
n in
wat
er u
se.
The
amou
nt w
ill v
ary
wid
ely
depe
ndin
g on
the
leak
s fo
und
and
how
long
they
wou
ld
have
rem
aine
d un
notic
ed. I
n 20
16/1
7 an
d 20
17/1
8 ov
er
12,0
00KL
was
est
imat
ed to
ha
ve b
een
save
d eq
uatin
g to
ap
prox
imat
ely
$26,
000.
3
*NEW
* En
sure
the
wat
er r
equi
rem
ents
with
in
the
Gre
en B
uild
ing
Polic
y ar
e in
clud
ed in
the
re-
furb
ishm
ent o
f the
Adm
inis
trat
ion
Build
ing.
Envi
ronm
ent,
Asse
ts20
18/2
019
To b
e as
sess
ed
as p
art o
f fe
asib
ility
st
udy.
Redu
ctio
n in
wat
er u
se
com
pare
d to
a “s
tand
ard”
bu
ildin
g.
4*N
EW*
If a
new
Dep
ot is
con
stru
cted
- En
sure
it
com
plie
s w
ith th
e w
ater
req
uire
men
ts o
f the
City
’s G
reen
Bui
ldin
g Po
licy.
Envi
ronm
ent,
Asse
ts20
22/2
023
To b
e as
sess
ed
as p
art o
f fe
asib
ility
st
udy.
Redu
ctio
n in
wat
er u
se
com
pare
d to
a “s
tand
ard”
bu
ildin
g.
5*N
EW*
Inve
stig
ate
prov
idin
g in
cent
ives
to r
esid
ents
of
Cal
liste
mon
Cou
rt a
nd B
anks
ia P
ark
to a
dopt
wat
er
savi
ng b
ehav
iour
s an
d ap
plia
nces
.
Envi
ronm
ent
2019
/202
0To
be
asse
ssed
as
par
t of
inve
stig
atio
n.
A w
ater
sav
ing
show
erhe
ad
alon
e ca
n sa
ve 5
000L
per
ho
useh
old
per
year
as
wel
l as
asso
ciat
ed h
ot w
ater
hea
ting
cost
s.
15
6*N
EW*
Inve
stig
ate
the
wat
er u
se in
the
grou
nds
of C
allis
tem
on C
ourt
and
Ban
ksia
Par
k an
d ad
opt
mea
sure
s to
red
uce
use
whe
re p
ossi
ble.
Envi
ronm
ent
2020
/202
1To
be
asse
ssed
as
par
t of
inve
stig
atio
n.
Redu
ctio
n in
wat
er u
se
7*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Part
ner
with
a d
evel
oper
to tr
ial w
ater
ta
nks
in n
ew s
ubdi
visi
ons.
Res
earc
h ot
her
coun
cils
w
here
this
has
bee
n re
quir
ed.
Envi
ronm
ent
2020
/202
1$0
Offi
cer
time.
An
app
ropr
iate
ly s
ized
ra
inw
ater
tank
plu
mbe
d to
to
ilets
and
laun
drie
s ca
n sa
ve
appr
ox. 2
0% o
f res
iden
tial
wat
er u
se. (
Dep
artm
ent o
f W
ater
, 201
8)8
*NEW
* Ru
n an
ann
ual W
ater
wis
e Ve
rge
Gar
deni
ng
prog
ram
, enc
oura
ging
peo
ple
to r
emov
e la
wn
and
plan
t a W
ater
wis
e an
d Fe
rtili
serw
ise
Gar
den
inst
ead.
Th
is p
rogr
am m
ay in
clud
e:
Prov
idin
g fr
ee m
ulch
to th
e co
mm
unity
.
Prov
idin
g su
bsid
ised
loca
l nat
ive
plan
t see
dlin
gs
thro
ugh
the
exis
ting
Seed
ling
Subs
idy
Sche
me.
Runn
ing
even
ts p
rovi
ding
adv
ice
expl
aini
ng h
ow to
pl
ant a
Wat
erw
ise
verg
e w
hile
mee
ting
the
City
’s ve
rge
requ
irem
ents
.
Part
icip
atin
g in
the
Wat
er C
orpo
ratio
n’s
Wat
erw
ise
verg
e fu
ndin
g pr
ogra
m a
nd
Prom
otin
g th
e Ci
ty’s
Wat
erw
ise
Verg
e tip
s do
cum
ent.
Envi
ronm
ent,
Engi
neer
ing
Ong
oing
$200
0 (s
eedl
ing
subs
idy
sche
me)
Num
ber
of r
esid
ents
re-
vege
tatin
g th
eir
verg
e.
9*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Revi
ew Ir
riga
tion
Dev
elop
men
t Gui
delin
es
(City
of K
win
ana,
201
4) in
clud
ing
refin
ing
the
wat
er
effici
ency
req
uire
men
ts w
ithin
thes
e G
uide
lines
.
Park
s an
d G
arde
ns20
18/1
9$0
Irri
gatio
n D
evel
opm
ent
Gui
delin
es r
evie
wed
.
10*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Cont
inue
to a
dd th
e re
mai
ning
20
bore
s to
the
cent
ralis
ed ir
riga
tion
cont
rolle
r an
d in
stal
l Va
riab
le S
peed
Dri
ve p
umps
as
bore
s ar
e re
deve
lope
d.
Park
s an
d G
arde
nsAn
nual
lyAn
nual
Par
ks
and
Gar
dens
Bu
dget
All b
ores
are
att
ache
d to
ce
ntra
lised
con
trol
ler.
16
WA
TER
SEN
SITI
VE C
ITY
GO
ALS
- IM
PRO
VE E
COLO
GIC
AL
HEA
LTH
& E
NSU
RE Q
UA
LITY
URB
AN
SPA
CE
REF.
ACT
ION
RESP
ON
SIBI
LITY
TIM
EFRA
ME
BUD
GET
MEA
SURE
OF
SUCC
ESS
11*N
EW*
Tria
l litt
er s
ocks
and
oth
er li
tter
cap
ture
m
etho
ds w
ith a
n ap
prop
riat
e m
aint
enan
ce r
egim
e in
sto
rmw
ater
out
lets
in r
eser
ves
and
expa
nd to
all
outle
ts if
suc
cess
ful.
Engi
neer
ing,
En
viro
nmen
t20
19/2
0$3
,000
eac
h Ca
pita
l Bu
dget
Redu
ctio
n of
litt
er, s
edim
ent
and
eros
ion
issu
es in
res
erve
s.
12*N
EW*
Cont
inue
the
ongo
ing
enfo
rcem
ent o
f the
Ve
rge
Perm
it Sy
stem
. Thi
s sy
stem
pro
vide
s an
en
forc
eabl
e pe
rmit
whi
ch a
llow
s th
e Ci
ty to
fine
bu
ilder
s fo
r w
orks
ites
whi
ch a
llow
rub
bish
and
se
dim
ent t
o es
cape
to th
e ve
rge
(and
sub
sequ
ently
the
stor
mw
ater
sys
tem
).
City
Ass
ist
Ong
oing
Ope
ratin
g bu
dget
, in
tern
al s
taff
Redu
ctio
n in
sed
imen
t an
d lit
ter
tran
spor
ted
to
rese
rves
. Red
uctio
n in
blo
cked
st
orm
wat
er in
fras
truc
ture
.
13*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Cont
inue
to ta
ckle
ille
gal d
umpi
ng in
the
City
thro
ugh
the
use
of e
duca
tion,
cov
ert c
amer
as,
acce
ss r
estr
ictio
n an
d th
e en
forc
emen
t of l
ocal
law
s.
Envi
ronm
ent/
City
As
sist
Ong
oing
Ope
ratin
g bu
dget
, in
tern
al s
taff
Redu
ctio
n in
litt
er tr
ansp
orte
d to
res
erve
s. R
educ
tion
in b
lock
ed s
torm
wat
er
infr
astr
uctu
re.
14*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Cont
inue
to p
rote
ct a
nd r
esto
re C
ity
man
aged
wet
land
hab
itats
thro
ugh
wee
d co
ntro
l and
pl
antin
g w
ith a
ppro
pria
te e
ndem
ic s
peci
es.
Envi
ronm
ent
Ong
oing
Ope
ratin
g bu
dget
, in
tern
al s
taff
Incr
ease
d ve
geta
ted
wet
land
bu
ffer
are
a.
15*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Cont
inue
to p
artic
ipat
e in
Cle
an U
p Au
stra
lia d
ay a
nd o
ther
litt
er r
educ
tion
initi
ativ
es.
Envi
ronm
ent
Ong
oing
Ope
ratin
g bu
dget
, in
tern
al s
taff
Redu
ctio
n in
litt
er tr
ansp
orte
d to
res
erve
s.
16*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Enco
urag
e de
velo
pers
to im
plem
ent
Wat
er S
ensi
tive
Urb
an D
esig
n in
new
dev
elop
men
ts
incl
udin
g pi
pele
ss d
esig
n in
are
as w
ith m
ultip
le
wat
er is
sues
in th
e Pe
el H
arve
y Ca
tchm
ent a
rea.
(R
equi
rem
ent o
f Wat
erw
ise
Coun
cils
Pro
gram
)
Engi
neer
ing/
Plan
ning
Ong
oing
$0Al
l new
dev
elop
men
ts in
clud
e W
ater
Sen
sitiv
e U
rban
Des
ign
17*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Refin
e m
aint
enan
ce p
roce
dure
s fo
r W
ater
Sen
sitiv
e U
rban
Des
ign
feat
ures
to e
nsur
e th
ey
mai
ntai
n th
eir
func
tion
and
amen
ity a
fter
han
dove
r.
Engi
neer
ing/
Plan
ning
/Par
ks
Ong
oing
$0Al
l Wat
er S
ensi
tive
Urb
an
Des
ign
feat
ures
are
ap
prop
riat
ely
mai
ntai
ned.
17
18*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Inve
stig
ate
an a
ppro
pria
te s
torm
wat
er
qual
ity m
onito
ring
pro
gram
to a
ssis
t with
pri
oriti
sing
an
d de
sign
ing
stor
mw
ater
ret
rofit
s.
Envi
ronm
ent
2020
/202
1O
pera
ting
budg
et.
Impr
oved
iden
tifica
tion
of
wat
er q
ualit
y is
sues
and
ho
tspo
ts.
WA
TER
SEN
SITI
VE C
ITY
GO
ALS
- IN
CREA
SE C
OM
MU
NIT
Y CA
PITA
L
REF.
ACT
ION
RESP
ON
SIBI
LITY
TIM
EFRA
ME
BUD
GET
MEA
SURE
OF
SUCC
ESS
19*N
EW*
Run
an a
nnua
l 7 w
eek
Sust
aina
ble
Livi
ng
Cour
se w
hich
incl
udes
wat
er e
ffici
ency
and
fert
ilise
r w
ise
prac
tices
.
Envi
ronm
ent
Annu
ally
$6,5
00N
umbe
r of
par
ticip
ants
and
th
eir
com
mitt
ed b
ehav
iour
ch
ange
s.
20*N
EW*
Enco
urag
e lo
cal s
choo
ls to
par
ticip
ate
in
the
Wat
erw
ise
Scho
ols
prog
ram
. (Re
quir
emen
t of
Wat
erw
ise
Coun
cils
Pro
gram
)
Envi
ronm
ent
Annu
ally
$0Al
l sch
ools
with
in th
e Ci
ty o
f Kw
inan
a ar
e pa
rtic
ipat
ing
Wat
erw
ise
Scho
ols.
21
*NEW
* En
cour
age
loca
l dev
elop
ers
to p
artic
ipat
e in
th
e W
ater
wis
e D
evel
opm
ent P
rogr
am. (
Requ
irem
ent o
f W
ater
wis
e Co
unci
ls P
rogr
am)
Envi
ronm
ent
Annu
ally
$0Al
l new
dev
elop
men
ts a
re
Wat
erw
ise
deve
lopm
ents
22*N
EW*
Del
iver
edu
catio
n ev
ents
aim
ed a
t red
ucin
g pl
astic
was
te w
hich
is a
larg
e pr
opor
tion
of th
e Ci
ty’s
litte
r.
Was
te
Man
agem
ent/
Envi
ronm
ent
Ong
oing
$0N
umbe
r of
par
ticip
ants
an
d co
mm
unity
sat
isfa
ctio
n w
ith th
e Ci
ty’s
sust
aina
bilit
y ed
ucat
ion
prog
ram
.
23*N
EW*
Cont
inue
to p
artic
ipat
e in
the
Switc
h Yo
ur
Thin
king
env
iron
men
tal e
duca
tion
prog
ram
.En
viro
nmen
tAn
nual
$500
0N
umbe
r of
par
ticip
ants
an
d co
mm
unity
sat
isfa
ctio
n w
ith th
e Ci
ty’s
sust
aina
bilit
y ed
ucat
ion
prog
ram
. 24
*NEW
* Pr
omot
e su
stai
nabl
e w
ater
man
agem
ent t
o th
e co
mm
unity
thro
ugh
our
com
mun
icat
ion
chan
nels
. (R
equi
rem
ent o
f Wat
erw
ise
Coun
cils
Pro
gram
)
Mar
ketin
gAn
nual
$0Es
timat
ed n
umbe
r of
peo
ple
reac
hed.
18
WA
TER
SEN
SITI
VE C
ITY
GO
ALS
- EN
SURE
GO
OD
WA
TER
SEN
SITI
VE G
OVE
RNA
NCE
REF.
ACT
ION
RESP
ON
SIBI
LITY
TIM
EFRA
ME
BUD
GET
MEA
SURE
OF
SUCC
ESS
25*E
XIS
TIN
G*
Cont
inue
to u
se a
cro
ss-f
unct
iona
l en
viro
nmen
tal t
eam
to c
onsi
der C
ounc
il en
viro
nmen
tal
initi
ativ
es.
All s
taff
Ong
oing
Dep
ende
nt
on in
itiat
ives
pr
opos
ed b
y th
e gr
oup.
Part
icip
atio
n an
d in
put f
rom
st
aff.
WA
TER
SEN
SITI
VE C
ITIE
S G
OA
L –
ALL
REF.
ACT
ION
RESP
ON
SIBI
LITY
TIM
EFRA
ME
BUD
GET
MEA
SURE
OF
SUCC
ESS
26*N
EW*
Reta
in th
e Ci
ty’s
Gol
d W
ater
wis
e Co
unci
l St
atus
. En
viro
nmen
tAn
nual
lyO
ffice
r tim
eSu
cces
sful
ly r
etai
n th
e G
old
Wat
erw
ise
Coun
cil S
tatu
s ea
ch
year
.
19
Monitoring and reviewThe City’s Sustainable Water Management Plan is intended to be reviewed and adapted to ensure it remains current and relevant. It is intended that this plan be reviewed midway through the plan cycle in the 2020/2021 financial year.
The review process will be coordinated by the Environment Department with input from relevant staff. Ongoing reviews will ensure the plan stays up to date with changes in policy and new technology. This process will also help to review priority areas, monitor progress towards goals and assess the effectiveness of implemented actions. It will also assist in the preparation of annual reports, budgets and the City’s Corporate Business Plan.
ReferencesAustralian Marine Conservation Society, 2018, Ocean Plastic Pollution, https://www.marineconservation.org.au/pages/ocean-plastic-pollution.html
City of Kwinana, 2017, Strategic Community Plan 2017-2027, http://www.kwinana.wa.gov.au/our-council/publications-reports/Publications/Strategic%20Community%20Plan%202017-2027.pdf
City of Kwinana, 2014, Irrigation Development Guidelines
City of Kwinana, 2013, Sustainable Water Management Plan http://www.kwinana.wa.gov.au/Documents/Publications/D13-54830--Sustainable-Water-Management-Plan-FINAL
CRC for Water Sensitive Cities, 2018, What is a Water Sensitive City?, https://watersensitivecities.org.au/what-is-a-water-sensitive-city/
Department of Environment and Conservation, 2012, The importance and value of wetlands, www.dec.wa.gov.au/management-and-protection/wetlands/values-of-wetlands.html
Department for Planning and Infrastructure, 2008, Better Urban Water Management, http://www.water.wa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1668/82305.pdf
Department of Planning, 2015, Draft 2015 Liveable Neighbourhoods, https://www.planning.wa.gov.au/dop_pub_pdf/LiveableNeighbourhoods_2015.pdf
Department of Water, 2004, Stormwater Management Manual for Western Australia, Department of Water, Perth, Western Australia.
Department of Water 2009, Perth-Peel Regional Water Plan 2010–2030 Responding to our drying climate, Department of Water, Perth, Western Australia.
Department of Water, 2018, Rainwater, http://www.water.wa.gov.au/urban-water/water-recycling-efficiencies/waterwise-community-toolkit/rainwater
Melbourne Water, 2018, Introduction to WSUD https://www.melbournewater.com.au/planning-and-building/stormwater-management/introduction-wsud
Water Corporation, 2018, Historical streamflow, https://www.watercorporation.com.au/water-supply/rainfall-and-dams/streamflow/streamflowhistorical
Water Corporation, 2018, Waterwise Council Program, https://www.watercorporation.com.au/home/business/saving-water/waterwise-programs/waterwise-council-program
Western Australian Planning Commission, 2003, Statement of Planning Policy No. 2.1 The Peel Harvey Coastal Plain Catchment, https://www.planning.wa.gov.au/dop_pub_pdf/spp2_1.pdf
20
Appe
ndix
A S
usta
inab
le W
ater
Man
agem
ent P
lan
2013
-201
7 ac
tions
and
pro
gres
sRe
fere
nce
Actio
nN
otes
on
prog
ress
1In
corp
orat
e w
ater
effi
cien
cy in
to th
e re
-des
ign
of C
alis
ta O
val a
s a
dest
inat
ion
adve
ntur
e pl
aygr
ound
and
pro
mot
e as
a “w
ater
wis
e” d
emon
stra
tion
park
. Ca
lista
O
val i
s on
e of
the
City
’s le
ast e
ffici
ent i
rrig
atio
n sy
stem
s an
d se
cond
hig
hest
gr
ound
wat
er c
onsu
mer
.
Com
plet
e
2Co
mpl
ete
irri
gatio
n au
ditin
g of
all
park
s an
d ad
just
irri
gatio
n sc
hedu
ling.
Co
mpl
ete
3Re
desi
gn th
e bu
bble
up
next
to S
ulph
ur r
oad
and
Not
tingh
am P
arkw
ay to
add
ress
w
ater
qua
lity,
ero
sion
and
litt
er is
sues
whi
le m
inim
isin
g im
pact
on
Wild
flow
er r
eser
ve.
This
may
invo
lve
inco
rpor
atin
g a
bior
eten
tion
basi
n an
d gr
oss
pollu
tant
trap
.
A lit
ter
cage
has
bee
n in
stal
led
to m
inim
ise
litte
r es
cape
. Fur
ther
re-
desi
gn is
req
uire
d.
4Re
deve
lop
the
stor
mw
ater
sum
p on
Ber
tram
Roa
d ne
xt to
the
Peel
Mai
n D
rain
and
Bo
llard
Bul
lrus
h Sw
amp
to in
corp
orat
e nu
trie
nt s
trip
ping
. Th
e re
-dev
elop
men
t of t
he s
ump
has
been
po
stpo
ned
until
the
neig
hbor
ing
land
is
deve
lope
d as
the
sum
p w
ill n
eed
to fi
t with
th
e de
sign
of t
he d
evel
opm
ent.
5
Carr
y ou
t a s
torm
wat
er q
ualit
y m
onito
ring
pro
gram
to a
ssis
t with
pri
oriti
sing
and
de
sign
ing
stor
mw
ater
ret
rofit
s.
Inco
mpl
ete.
Has
bee
n in
clud
ed in
the
upda
ted
plan
. 6
Part
ner
with
a d
evel
oper
to tr
ial w
ater
tank
s in
new
sub
divi
sion
s. R
esea
rch
othe
r co
unci
ls w
here
this
has
bee
n re
quir
ed (e
g By
ford
in S
erpe
ntin
e Ja
rrah
dale
).
Inco
mpl
ete.
Has
bee
n in
clud
ed in
the
upda
ted
plan
.7
Dev
elop
a c
heck
list w
hich
out
lines
in d
etai
l the
wat
er q
ualit
y an
d w
ater
con
serv
atio
n re
quir
emen
ts th
at th
e En
viro
nmen
t dep
artm
ent w
ill b
e ch
ecki
ng w
hen
asse
ssin
g w
ater
man
agem
ent p
lans
for
new
str
uctu
re p
lans
and
sub
divi
sion
s. T
his
is to
pro
vide
ce
rtai
nty
to d
evel
oper
s an
d en
sure
wat
er m
anag
emen
t req
uire
men
ts a
re a
ddre
ssed
ea
rly
and
are
ther
efor
e m
ore
likel
y to
be
adop
ted.
Com
plet
e. E
ngin
eeri
ng S
ervi
ces
asse
sses
th
e W
ater
Man
agem
ent P
lans
. Env
iron
men
t D
epar
tmen
t to
revi
ew th
e ch
eckl
ist
to b
e in
corp
orat
ed in
to E
ngin
eeri
ng’s
deve
lopm
ent a
ppro
val p
roce
ss.
8In
clud
e de
taile
d w
ater
man
agem
ent r
equi
rem
ents
in th
e cu
rren
t rev
iew
of t
he
Dev
elop
er G
uide
lines
. Co
mpl
ete.
Thi
s is
par
t of t
he Ir
riga
tion
Gui
delin
es.
9Pr
ogre
ss th
e ad
optio
n of
the
Dra
ft P
ublic
Ope
n Sp
ace
Gui
delin
es w
hich
inco
rpor
ate
deta
iled
wat
er m
anag
emen
t req
uire
men
ts.
Com
plet
e. T
his
is p
art o
f the
Irri
gatio
n G
uide
lines
.10
Impl
emen
t a G
ross
Pol
luta
nt T
rap
(GPT
) mon
itori
ng a
nd e
duct
ion
prog
ram
for
all
of th
e Ci
ty’s
GPT
s to
pre
vent
litt
er o
verfl
owin
g ou
t of t
he tr
aps
and
cont
amin
atin
g bu
shla
nd a
nd w
etla
nds.
Com
plet
e
21
11Im
plem
ent a
sed
imen
t com
plia
nce
and
educ
atio
n pr
ogra
m fo
r bu
ilder
s in
are
as
with
new
con
stru
ctio
n to
pre
vent
the
expo
rt o
f sed
imen
t to
the
stor
mw
ater
sys
tem
. Th
is w
ill r
educ
e pr
oble
ms
with
sto
rmw
ater
sys
tem
s bl
ocki
ng a
nd fl
oodi
ng a
s w
ell a
s se
dim
ent t
rans
port
ing
pollu
tant
s an
d sm
othe
ring
veg
etat
ion
at th
e bo
ttom
of t
he
catc
hmen
t.
Com
plet
e. T
his
invo
lved
incl
udin
g lit
ter
and
sedi
men
t in
the
Verg
e Pe
rmit
Syst
em. C
ity
Assi
st w
ill n
ow b
e en
forc
ing
thes
e pe
rmits
.
12D
evel
op a
bus
ines
s pl
an fo
r pu
rcha
sing
a s
wee
per
with
gul
ly s
ucke
r at
tach
ed to
en
sure
sto
rmw
ater
infr
astr
uctu
re is
kep
t cle
an a
nd th
eref
ore
litte
r is
pre
vent
ed fr
om
bloc
king
and
ove
rflow
ing
out o
f the
sto
rmw
ater
infr
astr
uctu
re a
nd c
onta
min
atin
g bu
shla
nd a
nd w
etla
nds.
Com
plet
e. It
was
not
fina
ncia
lly v
iabl
e to
pu
rcha
se a
sw
eepe
r.
13Re
sear
ch b
est p
ract
ice
envi
ronm
enta
l tec
hniq
ues
for
fert
ilise
r an
d he
rbic
ide
appl
icat
ion
and
incl
ude
spec
ifica
tions
in th
e te
nder
s fo
r fe
rtili
ser
and
herb
icid
e ap
plic
atio
n w
hen
they
are
ren
ewed
.
Com
plet
e. P
arks
and
Gar
dens
inco
rpor
ate
best
pra
ctic
e in
to th
eir
fert
ilise
r an
d he
rbic
ide
regi
me.
14
Cond
uct a
n in
vent
ory
of ir
riga
ted
verg
es a
nd s
tree
tsca
pe g
arde
ns in
the
Wel
lard
ar
ea, i
nves
tigat
e so
il ty
pe, p
lant
s, e
xist
ing
soil
amen
dmen
t and
irri
gatio
n sy
stem
and
de
term
ine
whe
ther
cha
nges
cou
ld b
e m
ade
whi
ch w
ould
allo
w th
eir
irri
gatio
n to
be
red
uced
or
rem
oved
with
out a
dver
se a
ffec
t on
the
land
scap
ing.
The
Dev
elop
er
Gui
delin
es, P
ublic
Ope
n Sp
ace
Gui
delin
es a
nd W
ater
Man
agem
ent P
lan
chec
klis
t sh
ould
all
proh
ibit
the
use
of s
mal
l irr
igat
ed s
tree
tsca
pe p
lant
ings
.
Park
s an
d G
arde
ns la
ter
felt
this
wou
ld
not b
e th
e be
st w
ay to
tack
le w
ater
use
in
this
are
a an
d ha
ve in
stea
d fo
cuse
d on
th
e ce
ntra
lised
con
trol
ler
and
irri
gatio
n sc
hedu
ling.
15Tr
ial a
sm
all s
cale
wea
ther
mon
itori
ng s
tatio
n on
the
irri
gatio
n co
ntro
ller
at O
relia
O
val o
r Ke
lly P
ark.
Th
e ce
ntra
lised
con
trol
ler
nega
tes
the
need
to
tria
l thi
s as
wea
ther
dat
a is
col
lect
ed
cent
rally
. 16
Inst
all v
aria
ble
spee
d bo
re p
umps
on
bore
s be
ing
repl
aced
with
new
ele
ctri
cs to
allo
w
for
mor
e eff
ectiv
e hy
droz
onin
g. T
his
will
als
o re
duce
the
elec
tric
ity c
onsu
mpt
ion
at th
e si
te. T
he D
evel
oper
Gui
delin
es, P
ublic
Ope
n Sp
ace
Gui
delin
es a
nd W
ater
M
anag
emen
t Pla
n ch
eckl
ist s
houl
d re
quir
e de
velo
pers
to u
se v
aria
ble
spee
d bo
re
pum
ps.
Pum
ps a
re b
eing
pro
gres
sive
ly r
epla
ced.
17Re
nova
te p
rior
ity r
ound
abou
ts w
ith “w
ater
less
” lan
dsca
ping
eg
perm
eabl
e pa
ving
or
wat
erle
ss lo
cal n
ativ
e la
ndsc
apin
g.
Inco
mpl
ete
and
has
not b
een
incl
uded
in
upda
ted
plan
as
it w
as fe
lt to
be
a lo
wer
pr
iori
ty.
18In
corp
orat
e w
ater
effi
cien
cy in
to th
e up
grad
e of
Har
ry M
cGui
gan
Park
.Co
mpl
ete
19Re
tain
dry
land
scap
ing
duri
ng th
e up
grad
e of
Hen
nese
y Pa
rk in
fitt
ing
with
the
inte
ntio
n to
sho
wca
se th
is p
ark
as a
nat
ural
spa
ce.
A sm
all s
ectio
n of
the
park
was
ulti
mat
ely
irri
gate
d to
impr
ove
the
amen
ity o
f the
pa
rk. T
he m
ajor
ity o
f the
par
k re
mai
ns a
s a
dry
land
scap
e.
22
20In
stal
l rea
l tim
e w
ater
mon
itori
ng o
n th
e Re
cqua
tic C
entr
e.Co
mpl
ete.
Has
iden
tified
leak
s an
d in
crea
sing
tren
ds in
poo
l top
up
whi
ch h
ave
been
inve
stig
ated
. Mos
t not
ably
a 1
4.3l
/m
inut
e le
ak w
hich
wou
ld n
ot h
ave
been
id
entifi
ed w
ithou
t the
mon
itori
ng.
21Co
nduc
t a w
ater
aud
it at
Ban
ksia
Par
k Re
tirem
ent V
illag
e an
d Ca
liste
mon
Cou
rt a
nd
retr
ofit a
s re
com
men
ded.
N
ot c
ompl
eted
due
to p
riva
cy c
once
rns
for
the
resi
dent
s.
22Co
nduc
t a w
ater
aud
it of
the
Recq
uatic
Cen
tre
to d
eter
min
e op
port
uniti
es fo
r re
duci
ng w
ater
use
. A
basi
c w
ater
aud
it ha
s be
en c
ondu
cted
as
part
of t
he C
ity’s
appl
icat
ion
to p
artic
ipat
e in
the
Wat
erw
ise
Aqua
tic C
entr
es p
rogr
am.
23Co
nduc
t a w
ater
aud
it of
the
Dep
ot to
det
erm
ine
oppo
rtun
ities
for
redu
cing
wat
er
use
and
harv
estin
g w
ater
. Co
mpl
ete.
A r
etro
fit w
as a
lso
com
plet
ed
base
d on
the
reco
mm
enda
tions
of t
his
repo
rt.
24Co
nduc
t a w
ater
aud
it of
Slo
ans
Cott
age
to d
eter
min
e op
port
uniti
es fo
r re
duci
ng
wat
er u
se.
Com
plet
e. T
he u
nusu
ally
hig
h co
nsum
ptio
n at
this
site
was
foun
d to
be
leak
s. A
logg
er
has
been
inst
alle
d to
mon
itor
this
site
. 25
Mon
itor
wat
er u
se a
t the
new
Dar
ius
Wel
ls b
uild
ing
and
impl
emen
t use
r be
havi
or
prog
ram
s to
red
uce
wat
er u
se if
wat
er u
se is
hig
h.
Com
plet
e. D
ata
logg
er h
as b
een
inst
alle
d an
d is
mon
itore
d at
leas
t wee
kly.
26
Inco
rpor
ate
best
pra
ctic
e w
ater
man
agem
ent i
n to
the
desi
gn o
f sha
red
use
oval
s at
sc
hool
s.
No
new
sha
red
use
oval
s ha
ve b
een
esta
blis
hed.
27
Impl
emen
t a b
ackw
ash
reus
e an
d ra
inw
ater
har
vest
ing
proj
ect a
t Rec
quat
ic.
Inco
mpl
ete.
Not
incl
uded
in th
e up
date
d pl
an a
s it
is n
ot li
kely
to b
e fin
anci
ally
fe
asib
le a
nd is
a lo
w p
rior
ity.
28Re
plac
e Ad
min
istr
atio
n Bu
ildin
g ir
riga
tion
syst
em w
ith a
new
sys
tem
des
igne
d to
m
eet i
ndus
try
stan
dard
s.Co
mpl
ete
29Fi
x le
ak in
hyd
roth
erap
y po
ol b
alan
ce ta
nk.
Com
plet
e30
Repl
ace
pool
filte
rs a
s pa
rt o
f Rec
quat
ic C
entr
e pl
ant r
oom
refi
t. Co
mpl
ete
23
w w w . k w i n a n a . w a . g o v . a u
ADMINISTRATION
Cnr Gilmore Ave and Sulphur Rd, Kwinana WA 6167 PO Box 21, Kwinana WA 6966
Hours Mon-Fri 8am-5pm (Cashier hours 8am-4pm)
Telephone 08 9439 0200