sustainable communities magazine- ceos for cities
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/22/2019 Sustainable Communities Magazine- CEOs for Cities
1/4
SustainableCommunities
TM
Vol 2, No 4 Fall 2012 www.p4sc.org $12
New unding or green retrofts .......................... p. 4
Just add water to create jobs ............................. p. 6
CEOs or Cities makes metrics un ...................... p. 23
Bostons Boom:
Fueled by Innovation
-
8/22/2019 Sustainable Communities Magazine- CEOs for Cities
2/4
ALL 2012 SuSTb CmmuTS 23
CEOs for CitiesInnovative ideas showcased at conference on urban issues
bSTSpeakers at the all conerence o CEOs or Cities
emphasized the importance o knowledge, an educated labor
orce and collaborative eorts to encourage innovation and
business start-ups.
CEOs or Cities President Lee isher tied together a vari-
ety o high-level presentations rom a combination o may-
ors and top-level scholars under the theme City o Ideas.
One o the critical lessons was that successul cities no
longer ollow the maxim that people go where the jobs are.
They are guided by the principle that people go to cities
that are attractive to them, and the jobs ollow. In other
words, the most successul cities, including Boston, have
worked hard to appeal to the young, well-educated workers
that todays growth businesses want to employ.
Other speakers emphasized the importance o using
modern technology to measure and monitor metrics o a
citys perormance. Again, the city o Boston is in the lead in
using detailed metrics to nd solutions to problems and in-
crease awareness o dynamics that are not well understood.
CEOs or Cities was the brainchild o Paul Grogan, a
long-time leader in housing and urban revitalization, and
currently CEO o The Boston oundation.
Grogan ounded the organization to ght or the nations
cities in a way that refected the public-private partnershipsthat emerged or community development in the 1970s and
gained momentum in the 80s.
We needed a new national urban organization that
refected what was happening in cities, to refect the local
partnerships that were driving urban revival, he said.
Grogan wrote about many o the cities that ought back
rom the decline o the 60s in a book titled Comeback Cit-
ies: A Blueprint or Urban Neighborhood Revival, which was
published in 2001.
CEOs or cities was seen as an alternative to traditional
urban advocacy groups, which adhered to the old model o
asking or ederal nancial assistance through prescriptive
programs or urban development.
Grogan helped organize the CEOs or Cities conerence in
Boston and assisted with moderating duties.
Asked what he considered the groups most impressive
achievement, Grogan said it is the City Dividends project.This research shows the value to cities o increasing such
things as the rate o college completion or reduction o ve-
hicle miles travelled even by small percentages.
City Dividends calculates the monetary gains the top 51
metros could realize i they increase their college attainment
Experts on one of the panels at the CEOs for Cities conference
Lee Fisher kicks off CEOs for Cities conference in Boston
airos Shen, Director of
Planning, City of Boston
Paul Grogan, CEO of The
Boston Foundation
PHOTO
S:TARA
STURM,CEOSfOR
CITIES
http://www.amazon.com/Comeback-Cities-Blueprint-Neighborhood-Revival/dp/0813339529http://www.amazon.com/Comeback-Cities-Blueprint-Neighborhood-Revival/dp/0813339529http://www.amazon.com/Comeback-Cities-Blueprint-Neighborhood-Revival/dp/0813339529http://www.amazon.com/Comeback-Cities-Blueprint-Neighborhood-Revival/dp/0813339529 -
8/22/2019 Sustainable Communities Magazine- CEOs for Cities
3/4
SuSTb CmmuTS ALL 201224
Which cities will scceed?Data compilation by CEOs for Cities points to likely winners
By Alexander Cartwright
San Jose, California
Data is everything in todays battle among cities to besuccessul, green, and attractive to businesses with jobsto oer and taxes to pay. One o the best compilations o
data is City Vitals rom CEOs or cities, not just because it
contains a lot o good inormation but mostly because it puts
it in a clear, understandable context.
The material is in a book titled City Vitals 2.0: Bench-
marking City Perormance by Joe Cortright, senior policy
advisor at CEOS or Cities, Impresa, Inc.
In the report, Cortright benchmarks city perormance in
the our areas most vital to success: Connections, Innova-
tion, Talent, and Your distinctiveness. Connectedness o a
city has to do with behaviors like voting, community involve-
ment, economic integration, transit use, walkability, interna-
tional students, and internet connectivity.
Innovation is measured by things like the number o pat-
ents, venture capital activity, entrepreneurship, and small
business success. Talent is measured by the percentage o
college graduates, the number o creative proessionals, and
other actors.
by one percentage point (The Talent Divi-
dend), reduce VMT by 1 mile per person
per day (The Green Dividend) and reduce
the number o people in poverty (The Op-
portunity Dividend) by one percentage
point.City Dividends is designed to help urban
leaders make the case or pubic policies
that will help raise incomes, encourage citi-
zens to drive less and increase opportuni-
ties or bringing people out o poverty. City
Dividends establishes a ramework or ex-
amining the policies, actions and conditions
that are needed or cities to actually realize
these gains in practice.
It shows there is a nancial benet
to cities to push or these things. It helps
people get a handle on things where the
benets are not readily identiable, Gro-
gan said.Another organizational achievement is
the encouragement o groups o ocials
rom the same city to participate as a clus-
ter in the groups events, Grogan said. It
amplies the power to be infuential and
plant ideas, when people rom the same
town go to meetings together. It refects
how things are getting done.
Carlo Ratti, Director,
SENSEable City Laboratory, a
new research initiative at the
Massachusetts Institute of
Technology
PHOTO: WIKIMEDIA COMM
-
8/22/2019 Sustainable Communities Magazine- CEOs for Cities
4/4
ALL 2012 SuSTb CmmuTS 25
The most unusual item in CEOs list o what makes a city
successul is distinctiveness, which includes something CEOs
calls the weirdness actor. Its best to just quote City Vitals
directly: The unique characteristics o place may be the
only truly deensible source o competitive advantage or re-
gions. In a world o global competition, a strategy o prettymuch the same, maybe cheaper is a recipe or mediocrity
and economic stagnation.
The act that CEOs tried to quantiy this characteristic
is impressive. Its not the sort o thing that lends itsel to
measuring and Ive yet to see anyone else suggest how to do
so. CEOs candidly admits that its measures o distinctiveness
are inherently incomplete. Every city has its own unique
characteristics or which there are ew, i any, statistics, the
report says. CEOs is basically giving people a starting point
to think about this dimension o city lie.
Among the measures o distinctiveness are the ratio o
persons that reported attending a culture event in the past
year to the number o households with high denition televi-sions, the variety o restaurants in the city, and the variety
o internet searches undertaken.
The report also introduces the concept o core measures
o vitality, which look at income, poverty and college attain-
ment within the urban core vs. the entire city. CEOs believes
this is a better way to compare city to city perormance.
So, you are probably wondering where specic cities
stack up in terms o these metrics. To get the ull report, click
here.
But heres a preview on a ew key measurements, includ-
ing the top ve cities in each category.
voting: Measured by the number o votes cast in the
November 2008 presidential election divided by the voting
age population o the metropolitan area, 2008. The highest
scoring cities are:
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI
Raleigh-Cary, NC
St. Louis, MO-IL
Jacksonville, L
These cities had scores o 68 to 76 percent. The mean is
60 percent.
nnoatie Cit; Measured by the number o patents issued
per 10,000 employees, 2009. The highest scoring cities are:
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
Austin-Round Rock, TX
San rancisco-Oakland-remont, CA
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
Rochester, NY
These cities had 22 to 83 patents. The mean is 8.8.
Talented Cit: Measured by the percentage o the metro-politan population 25 years old or older that have completed a
our-year college degree, 2010. The highest scoring cities are:
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
San rancisco-Oakland-remont, CA
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH
Raleigh-Cary, NC
These cities had scores o 41 to 47 percent. The mean is
31.6 percent.
yor istinctie Cit: The weirdness index is dened
as the average o the extent to which the metropolitan
areas ten most distinctive consumer behaviors exceed the
national norm or each behavior, 2008. The highest scoring
cities are:
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
San rancisco-Oakland-remont, CA
Salt Lake City, UT
Denver-Aurora-Broomeld, CO
Miami-ort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, L
These cities had scores o 6 to 9.1. The mean is 3.4.
GG eissions highest in idwest
The City Vitals report also ranks cities according to
per capita GHG emissions in 2008. While you might
expect Los Angeles to be at the top o the list, its not.Los Angeles is at the bottom.
Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN
Louisville-Jeerson County, KY-IN
Nashville-Davidson-Murreesboro-ranklin, TN
St. Louis, MO-IL
These cities had per capita emissions o 3.2 to
3.4 tons.
At the bottom o the list were the New York, LA,
Seattle, San Jose and Portland metro areas. The mean
or all areas is 2.4 tons o carbon emissions per person
per year.
The unique characteristics of place may
be the only truly defensible source of
competitive advantage for regions. In a world
of global competition, a strategy of pretty
much the same, maybe cheaper is a recipe
for mediocrity and economic stagnation.
http://www.ceosforcities.org/city-vitals/research/city-vitals-2.0-2012/http://www.ceosforcities.org/city-vitals/research/city-vitals-2.0-2012/http://www.ceosforcities.org/city-vitals/research/city-vitals-2.0-2012/http://www.ceosforcities.org/city-vitals/research/city-vitals-2.0-2012/