sustainability with ultra high performance and geopolymer ... · cost of building (ringgit...
TRANSCRIPT
Sustainability with
Ultra High Performance and
Geopolymer Concrete Construction
Workshop: Innovative Materials & Techniques in Concrete Construction, Corfu (GR), Oct. 2010
Professor Stephen Foster
Mr. Tian Sing Ng
Centre for Infrastructure Engineering and Safety
The University of New South Wales, Australia
Dr. Yen Lei VooDura Technology, Malaysia
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
�Introduction
�Sustainability design concepts
�Examples
�Concluding remarks
IntroductionIntroduction
“Design criteria are given with relation
to reliability, functionality, durability and
sustainability, where the last category is sustainability, where the last category is
in the state of development.”
Preface Model Code Draft, Walraven, Convener fib SAG5
UltraUltra--High Performance ConcreteHigh Performance Concrete
� Highly homogeneous
cementitious based
composite without coarse
aggregates.
� Strong, durable and
Immediate Cost
Saving
Longer Service
Life
Reduce Global Reduce
Minimal or Negligible
Maintenance
� Strong, durable and
ductile
� Suitable for use in the
production of precast
elements Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable construction with RPCconstruction with RPCconstruction with RPCconstruction with RPCconstruction with RPCconstruction with RPCconstruction with RPCconstruction with RPC
Global Warming Potential
Reduce Use of
Material
Sustainable Construction
Remarkable Life-Cycle
Cost Saving
Reduce Construction Time & Risk
Geopolymer ConcreteGeopolymer Concrete
� Contains No Portland cement
� Alkali activation of industrial
aluminosilicate waste materials
such as fly ash and slag
� Low shrinkage and creep,
Sustainable Construction
Longer Service
Life
Reduce Global
Warming Potential
Low Carbon Emission
Minimal or Negligible
Maintenance
� Low shrinkage and creep,
superior chemical resistances
� Moderate to low elastic modulus
for its strength
� Suitable for use in the production
of precast elements for civil and
structural engineering.
Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable Towards sustainable construction with Geopolymer construction with Geopolymer construction with Geopolymer construction with Geopolymer construction with Geopolymer construction with Geopolymer construction with Geopolymer construction with Geopolymer
ConcreteConcreteConcreteConcreteConcreteConcreteConcreteConcrete
Potential
Reduce Use of Virgin Material
Recycle Industrial
Waste
Remarkable Life-Cycle
Cost Saving
Sustainability Design ApproachSustainability Design Approach
Environmental
Impact Calculation
Environmental
Impact Calculation
DurabilityDesign
DurabilityDesign
Three criteria for assessment of a sustainable design:
� Environmental impact calculation
• Embodied energy; and
• 100 year Global Warming Potential
Limit States
Design
Limit States
Design
SLS
ULS
Stability
� Design for longevity (i.e. durable structures), and
� Limit states design.
• Serviceability limit state;
• Stability limit state; and
• Ultimate limit state
Measure of optimisation of the materials used with respect to
the embodied energy (EE), CO2 emissions & global warming
potential (GWP) benchmarked against existing practice.
Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)
20 year Global Warming Potential:
50 year Global Warming Potential:
20-year GWP = CO2 + 289 NOx + 72 CH4
50 year Global Warming Potential:
100 year Global Warming Potential:
100-year GWP = CO2 + 298 NOx + 25 CH4
Ref: 2007 International Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (AR4)
50-year GWP = CO2 + 294 NOx + 42 CH4
* Hydrofluorocarbon and sulphur hexafluoride gases are excluded from the above
equations as there are not emitted in concrete industry.
100-years is the most commonly used time horizon for
GWP assessment:
Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)
Environmental Impact Calculation Data SheetEnvironmental Impact Calculation Data Sheet
100-year GWP = CO2 + 298 NOx + 25 CH4
100-years is the most commonly used time horizon for
GWP assessment:
Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)
Environmental Impact Calculation Data SheetEnvironmental Impact Calculation Data Sheet
100-year GWP = CO2 + 298 NOx + 25 CH4
100-years is the most commonly used time horizon for
GWP assessment:
Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)
Environmental Impact Calculation Data SheetEnvironmental Impact Calculation Data Sheet
100-year GWP = CO2 + 298 NOx + 25 CH4
100-years is the most commonly used time horizon for
GWP assessment:
Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)Environmental Impact Calculation (EIC)
Environmental Impact Calculation Data SheetEnvironmental Impact Calculation Data Sheet
100-year GWP = CO2 + 298 NOx + 25 CH4
Example 1 : Example 1 : Single Span 40m Concrete Road BridgeSingle Span 40m Concrete Road Bridge
Bridge width: 15 m
Imposed live load: Load models 1 - 4 with special vehicle 1800/150 (EC1-Part 2)
Design life: 120 years at EC2 exposure class XS1 (exposure to airborne salt).
Concrete Road BridgeConcrete Road Bridge
FULL WIDTH 15000
WALKWAY
2500
WALKWAY
2500
CARRIAGEWAY
10000
200mm THK. RC DECK
50mm THK ASPHALT (1 kPa) RC PARAPET
(9.22kN/m)
WALKWAY
9 kN/m
I – Girder section for Portland
cement and geopolymer concreteU – Girder section for RPCvs
100 100 100 100
92.1100
Co
nve
nti
on
al M
eth
od
(O
PC
co
ncre
te)
as 1
00
OPC Concrete RPC Geopolymer Concrete
- 7 Nos. girders, each weighs 21.5kN/m
- Prestressed & steel reo to carry shear
force and transverse moment
- 3 Nos. girders, each weighs 22kN/m
- Prestressed & steel fibres to carry shear
force and transverse moment
5000 5000
FULL WIDTH 15000
2500 2500
WALKWAY
2500
WALKWAY
2500
CARRIAGEWAY
10000
200mm THK. RC DECK
50mm THK ASPHALT (1 kPa)
UHPdC U-GIRDER
(G = 22 kN/m)
RC PARAPET(9.22kN/m)
1950
200mm THK. RC DECK
CONVENTIONALSUPER-TEE GIRDER
(G = 21.5 kN/m) 2325
2250 2250 2250 2250 2250 2250
CONVETIONAL METHOD (VIEW A-A)
UHPdC METHOD (VIEW B-B)
WALKWAY
9 kN/m
62.5
80.377.1
79.7
92.1
80.082.6
59.6
0
20
40
60
80
Mass of Material(excluded Waste
Product)
Embodied energy CO2 Emission 100 yr GWP
Co
nve
nti
on
al M
eth
od
(O
PC
co
ncre
te)
as 1
00
B
ase
lin
e In
de
x
Environmental Impact CalculationEnvironmental Impact Calculation
Concrete Road BridgeConcrete Road Bridge
Australian Super – T Girder section
for Portland cement and
geopolymer concrete
U – Girder section for RPCvs
- 6 Nos. girders, each weighs 17kN/m
- Prestressed & steel reo to carry shear
force and transverse moment
- 3 Nos. girders, each weighs 22kN/m
- Prestressed & steel fibres to carry shear
force and transverse moment
WALKWAY 2500
CARRIAGEWAY 10000
WALKWAY 2500
FULL WIDTH 15000
50mm THK ASPHALT (1 kPa) RC PARAPET(9.22kN/m)
WALKWAY9 kN/m 100 100 100 100
OPC Concrete RPC Geopolymer Concrete
Environmental Impact CalculationEnvironmental Impact Calculation5000 5000
FULL WIDTH 15000
2500 2500
WALKWAY 2500
CARRIAGEWAY 10000
RPC U-GIRDER
(G = 22 kN/m)1950
CONVENTIONALSUPER-TEE GIRDER
(G = 17 kN/m)
CONVENTIONAL METHOD (VIEW A-A)
RPC METHOD (VIEW A-A)
2500 2500 2500 2500 2500
2000
WALKWAY 2500
200mm THK. RC DECK
(9.22kN/m)9 kN/m
200mm THK. RC DECK
50mm THK ASPHALT (1 kPa) RC PARAPET
(9.22kN/m)WALKWAY9 kN/m
100 100 100 100
79.2
86.5 88.090.692.0
84.3 86.0
65.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
Mass of Material(excluded Waste
Product)
Embodied energy CO2 Emission 100 yr GWP
Co
nve
nti
on
al M
eth
od
(O
PC
co
ncre
te)
as 1
00
B
ase
lin
e In
de
x
Example 2 : Example 2 : 1.5m high Retaining Wall1.5m high Retaining Wall
Design Load: 10 kPa (service); 15 kPa (ultimate)
WallWall
CROSS SECTION
750
100MM CHAMBER
30
30
1000
100
100
50
50
1500
25 25 kPakPa Surcharge LoadingSurcharge Loading
100 100 100 100
24.3
52.7
60.164.8
90.8
75.3
81.0
42.7
0
20
40
60
80
100
Mass of Material(excluded Waste
Product)
Embodied energy CO2 Emission 100 yr GWP
Co
nven
tio
nal M
eth
od
(O
PC
co
ncre
te)
as 1
00
Baseli
ne In
dex
OPC Concrete RPC Geopolymer Concrete
Conventional RPC – DURA®
Environmental Impact CalculationEnvironmental Impact Calculation
Benefits of High Performance MaterialsBenefits of High Performance Materials
� Reduction in overall consumption of non-renewable
raw materials;
� Encourage the use of recycled materials;
� Higher quality and finishes of finishing products;� Higher quality and finishes of finishing products;
� Longer service life with a minimum of maintenance
� Final products that have reduced total CO2
emissions, reduced EE, and reduced GWP providing
a better utilisation of materials
RPC Portal Frame SystemRPC Portal Frame System(Dura Technology, Malaysia)(Dura Technology, Malaysia)
RPC Portal Frame SystemRPC Portal Frame System
84.1 87.1
76.381.4 83.8
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Cost Material (ton) Embodied
Energy
CO2 Emission 100 yr GWP
Ba
se 1
00
% f
or
Ste
el P
ort
al
Fra
me
Steel Portal Frame Dura Portal Frame
Energy
Environmental Impact CalculationEnvironmental Impact Calculation
Table 1 – Material quantities and EIC for Example 2.
Conventional Steel
Portal Frame System
DURA®
-UHPdC
Portal Frame System
Raw Material (tonne)↑ 1403 1222
Steel (tonne) 116 80
Cement (tonne) 158 192
Embodied Energy (GJ) 3707 2830
CO2 Emission (tonne) 417 340
100-years GWP (tonne) 946 793
Cost of building (Ringgit Malaysia) 722,728 (year 2007) 608,052 (year 2008)
↑ total mass of material consumption for the portal frame, metal roofing, purlins, lateral and cross bracing,
bolting, stiffeners, wall cladding, reinforced concrete slab and beams and pile caps (but excluded piling).
Material Quantities, EIC & CostMaterial Quantities, EIC & Cost
RPC Wall SystemRPC Wall System(Dura Technology, Malaysia)(Dura Technology, Malaysia)
19
RPC Wall SystemRPC Wall System(Dura Technology, Malaysia)(Dura Technology, Malaysia)
20
Advances in Concrete TechnologyAdvances in Concrete Technology
Lightweight Geopolymer Concrete @ UNSWLightweight Geopolymer Concrete @ UNSW
� Mix design: fly ash, slag, sodium hydroxide, sodium
silicates solution, water, sand &
cenospheres.
Basic Material PropertiesBasic Material Properties
Plain 1% Steel Fibres 2% Steel Fibres
Dry density ρ (kg/m3) 1680 1700 1800
Compressive strength fcm (MPa) 64.6 60.8 72.2
Modulus of Elasticity E (GPa) 13.1 13.5 17.9
Indirect tensile test fct.sp (MPa) 2.4 6.7 8.0
Basic Material PropertiesBasic Material Properties
Testing:Testing: Lightweight Geopolymer Concrete BeamLightweight Geopolymer Concrete Beam
200
50
10
0
120
55
3 x 7.4φAFRP
Technora
Rod
AFRP
StrengthenedCore
CrossCross--Section: Section: AFRP Strengthened Core BeamAFRP Strengthened Core Beam(AFRP Core = Hand Lay(AFRP Core = Hand Lay--up of 3 layers of Kevlarup of 3 layers of Kevlar®®--49 49
Experimental Test SetupExperimental Test Setup2000.0
1600.0
533.5 533.0 533.5
LVDT 1roller support
pin support
Load (P)
spreader beam
beam
specimen
All dimensions are in mm
LVDT 2 LVDT 3
200
50
100
120
55
Polystyrene
Foam as
sacrificial
form
(AFRP Core = Hand Lay(AFRP Core = Hand Lay--up of 3 layers of Kevlarup of 3 layers of Kevlar®®--49 49 300gsm Biaxial sheets with vinyl300gsm Biaxial sheets with vinyl--ester resin) ester resin)
CrossCross--Section: Section: Hollow Core BeamHollow Core Beam
Experimental Test SetupExperimental Test Setup
Lightweight Geopolymer Concrete BeamLightweight Geopolymer Concrete Beam
60
80
100
120
Loa
d,
P (
kN
)
2% vol. Steel 2% vol. Steel FibresFibres & &
AFRP Strengthened Core AFRP Strengthened Core
BeamBeam
Plain & AFRP Plain & AFRP
0
20
40
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Loa
d,
P (
kN
)
Mid Deflection (mm)
Plain & Hollow Plain & Hollow
Core BeamCore Beam
1% vol. Steel 1% vol. Steel FibresFibres & &
AFRP Strengthened Core AFRP Strengthened Core
BeamBeam
Plain & AFRP Plain & AFRP
Strengthened Core Strengthened Core
BeamBeam
Lightweight Geopolymer Concrete BeamLightweight Geopolymer Concrete Beam
Failure Load = 14.3 kN
Plain & Hollow Core BeamPlain & Hollow Core Beam
Failure Load = 39.0 kN
Plain & AFRP Strengthened Core BeamPlain & AFRP Strengthened Core BeamPlain & AFRP Strengthened Core BeamPlain & AFRP Strengthened Core Beam
Failure Load = 97.0 kN
1% vol. Steel 1% vol. Steel FibresFibres & AFRP Strengthened Core Beam& AFRP Strengthened Core Beam
Failure Load = 114.1 kN
2% vol. Steel 2% vol. Steel FibresFibres & AFRP Strengthened Core Beam& AFRP Strengthened Core Beam
� Environmental Impact Assessment calculation show that high
performance materials and “green materials” are able to
provide savings in terms of primary material consumption,
embodied energy, CO2 emissions and global warming potential.
� High performance materials open the door for new, innovative,
design approaches that can lead to more sustainable structures
Concluding Remarks Concluding Remarks
design approaches that can lead to more sustainable structures
that provide for lower life-cycle costs.
� Objective, simple, metric measures such as embodied energy
(EE) and 100-year global warming potential (GWP) enable
designers to evaluate, quantify and compare the environmental
implications of their designs.