sustainability by combining nuclear, fossil, and
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
1/17
Sustainability by combining nuclear,
fossil, and renewable energy sources
Presented by:
Ngasampam Rungsung
11ME62R13
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
2/17
Introduction
Three main sources of energy are:
Fossil fuels, renewables and nuclear.
The two major energy challenges :
Replacing crude oil.
Reducing green house gas emissions.
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
3/17
Liquid fuels
Liquid fuels (gasoline, diesel, etc.) remain thelargest energy source.
World oil consumption is about 80 million barrelsper day (1 barrel = 159 litres)
Liquid fuels can be produced from:
- crude oil- heavy feedstock like heavy oil, tar sands, shaleoil, and coal.
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
4/17
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
5/17
Recovering underground resources
Fossil-fuel resources are very large but most ofthem are economically irrecoverable.
US has the largest deposits of oil shale. It isestimated that US has 800 billion barrel ofrecoverable oil.
Thus recovering them economically and withouthigh emission of CO2 becomes necessary.
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
6/17
In-Situ Refining
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
7/17
Underground heating
Electricity. Heating of oil shaleproduces both liquids and
gases. These gases can be
burnt to supply the requiredelectricity.
A high temperature nuclear
reactor can be used toproduce the required high
temperature heat.
oil shale
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
8/17
Fig. configuration for underground heating of oil shale with nuclear heat.
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
9/17
Advantages of using nuclear reactor
Direct use of high temperature heat
No need of converting heat into electricity
or vice versa.
Emission of CO2 is avoided.
Energy consumption is reduced by a factor
of 2.
About 12GW(t) of heat would be required
to produce a million barrels of oil per day.
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
10/17
Peak electricity Production
Electricity demand varies daily, weekly, and
seasonally.
The outputs from renewable sources of
energy are highly variable.
Today, fossil fuels are mainly used to meet
these variations.
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
11/17
Existing non-fossil methods for
producing peak electricity
Hydropower
Compressed Air Energy System
Nuclear Energy
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
12/17
Options to meet the peak electricity:
1. Hydrogen intermediate and peak electricity system
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
13/17
2. Nuclear-combustion combined-cycle
(NCCC) systems
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
14/17
Advantages of NCCC system
Electricity output is increased by a factor of up
to 4 during peak electricity supply.
There is no need to control air-fuel ratio to
ensure flame stability.
Response time to changes in power demand is
much faster.
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
15/17
Conclusions
The traditional paradigm is that nuclear, fossil,
and renewable energy sources are competitors.
But in fact, they should be coupled together to
give more satisfactory results. In the longer term, nuclear energy is potentially
the enabling technology for the large-scale use of
renewable electricity because nuclear energymay be able to provide peak electricity when the
sun does not shine or the wind does not blow.
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
16/17
References Agrawal, R., Singh, N.R., Ribeiro, F.H., Delgass, W.N., 2007. Sustainable fuel for the
transport sector. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (12), 48284833.
Anderson, R.E., Doyle, S.E., Pronske, K.L., 2004. Demonstration andcommercialization of zero-emission power plants. In: Proceedings of the 29thInternational Technical Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems, Clearwater, FL,April 1822.
Bossel, U., Eliasson, B., January 8, 2003. Energy and the Hydrogen Economy.
Farrell, A.E., Gopal, A.R., 2008. Bioenergy research needs for heat, electricity, andliquid fuels. MRS Bulletin 33 (4), 373380.
Forsberg, C.W., 2005. Nuclear Hydrogen for Peak Electricity Production and SpinningReserve. ORNL/TM-2004/194. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Forsberg, C.W., 2006. High-temperature nuclear reactors for in-situ recovery of oilfrom oil shale. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Congress on Advances inNuclear Power Plants (ICAPP06), Reno, Nevada, June 48, 2006. American NuclearSociety, La Grange Park, IL.
Forsberg, C.W., 2007a. Meeting U.S. liquid transport fuel needs with a nuclearhydrogen biomass system. In: Proceedings of the American Institute of ChemicalEngineers Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, November 49.
Forsberg, C.W., 2007b. Economics of meeting peak electricity demand using nuclearhydrogen and oxygen. In: Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on theSafety and Technology of Nuclear Hydrogen Production, Control, and Management,Boston, Massachusetts, June 2428, 2007. American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park,
IL.
-
8/2/2019 Sustainability by Combining Nuclear, Fossil, And
17/17
U.S. Department of Energy, 2007a. Biomass Program: Lignin-Derived Co-Products.Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Available from:
Forsberg, C.W., 2008b. Is hydrogen the future of nuclear energy. Nucl. Technol., inpress.
Gary, J.H., Handwerk, G.E., Kaiser, M.J., 2007. Petroleum Refining: Technology andEconomics, fifth ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Self, F.E., Ekholm, E.L., Bowers, K.E., 2007. Refining OverviewdPetroleum,Processes, and Products. CD-ROM. American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Shinnar, R., Citro, F., 2006. A roadmap to U.S. decarbonization. Science 313, 1243.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007. The Future of Coal: Options for aCarbon- ConstrainedWorld. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,MA.
Montague, L., 2003. Lignin Process Design Confirmation and Capital Cost
Evaluation. NREL/SR-510-31579. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden,CO.
Ragausk, A.J., et al., 2006. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science311, 484489.
Zweibel, K., Mason, J., Fthenakis, V., 2008. A solar grand plan. Sci. Am. 298 (1), 6473.