surveying the state of library assessment

43
Surveying the State of Library Assessment MICHAEL HOLT Valdosta State University LOUISE LOWE Mercer University EMILY THORNTON University of North Georgia CRISTINA HERNÁNDEZ TROTTER Oconee Regional Library System Presentation graphics by Abbie Gettys

Upload: chtrotter

Post on 23-Jan-2017

136 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

Surveying the State

of Library Assessment

MICHAEL HOLT Valdosta State UniversityLOUISE LOWE Mercer University

EMILY THORNTON University of North GeorgiaCRISTINA HERNÁNDEZ

TROTTEROconee Regional Library System

Presentation graphics by Abbie Gettys

Page 2: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

SURVEY GOALSWhat were our goals with the

survey?What is being assessed in libraries today?

What tools and methods are being used?

What should be assessed, but is not? Why?

Page 3: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

SURVEY BACKGROUNDDATES:

Survey open May 3rd – June 3rd, 2016

INTENDED PARTICIPANTS:

Anyone who self-identifies as being responsible for any type of assessment or evaluation in any kind of library.

DISTRIBUTION OF INVITATIONS:

Acrlassesdg - ACRL Assessment listservArl-assess, GLA-L , MLA, PUBLIB, ALA Spectrum Scholars

List

Page 4: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

SURVEY CONTENTS

How they are responsible for

library assessment

Job Title

Years of experience in

libraries overall and in assessment

Perception of effectiveness of assessment plan/practices

Examples of what is being assessed at their library

Examples of what is not

being assessed at their library

• What tools/methods?• How are results used?

• What are the barriers?

Page 5: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

281 TOTAL RESPONDENTS1.4%

Page 6: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

RESPONDENTS’ EXPERIENCE IN LIBRARIES

0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 16-20 years 20+ years0102030405060708090

100

4350 54

39

95

(15%)(18%)

(19%)

(14%)

(34%)

Page 7: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

RESPONDENTS’ EXPERIENCE WITH ASSESSMENT

0-1 years 2-3 years 4-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 16-20 years 20+ years0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

25

61

48

60

38

2227

(9%)

(21%)

(17%)

(21%)

(14%)

(8%)(10%)

Page 8: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

RESULTS: IS IT AN OFFICIAL RESPONSIBILITY?

Page 9: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

WHAT ARE THEY DOING BESIDES ASSESSMENT?

Page 10: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

HOW WOULD YOU RATE YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF ASSESSMENT IN

LIBRARIES?

Not kn

owled

geab

le at

all

Slight

ly kn

owled

geab

le

Moder

ately

know

ledge

able

Very k

nowled

geab

le

Extre

mely kn

owled

geab

le0

40

80

120

330

12995

23

Page 11: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

HOW KNOWLEDGEABLE ARE RESPONDENTS ABOUT

ASSESSMENT?

Page 12: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

RESULTS: CORRELATION BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE AND

COMFORT?

Page 13: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

HOW COMFORTABLE ARE YOU WORKING

WITH ASSESSMENT?

04080

120160

416 40

13783

Page 14: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

HOW COMFORTABLE ARE THEY WORKING WITH ASSESSMENT?

Page 15: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

EXTREME COMFORT WITH ASSESSMENT AND RELATION TO

JOB TITLE

Page 16: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

DOES YOUR LIBRARY CURRENTLY HAVE AN ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

OR PLAN?

Page 17: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

ASSESSMENT PLANS/PROGRAMSBY LIBRARY TYPE

Page 18: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

HOW EFFECTIVE IS YOUR LIBRARY’S ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

OR PLAN?

Page 19: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

EFFECTIVENESS BY LIBRARY TYPE

Page 20: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

DOES EXPERIENCE CHANGE PERCEPTIONS

OF EFFECTIVENESS?

• Most effectiveness ratings fell into very effective or moderately effective no matter what the experience level with assessment was.

• There is a slight upward shift in effectiveness ratings as experience with assessment increases.

• Moderately effective was the most popular rating across all experience levels.

Page 21: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

DOES EXPERIENCE CHANGE PERCEPTIONS OF EFFECTIVENESS?

Page 22: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

Having a plan seems to make for a higher effectiveness rating of assessment practices.

DOES HAVING A FORMALASSESSMENT PLAN AFFECT

PERCEPTIONS OF EFFECTIVENESS?

of those with a formal plan rated their practices as very or extremely effective.

without a plan rated their practices that highly.

of those unsure whether or not they had a plan rated their practices that highly.

41% 23.4% 25%

Page 23: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

EFFECTIVENESS BY JOB TITLEThose with assessment explicitly listed in their job description rated their

effectiveness slightly higher than their counterparts.

of those with assessment in their job title/description rated the effectiveness of their practices as extremely or very effective.

44%

of those without assessment as an explicit component of their job rated their practices as extremely or very effective.

20% The largest percentage of both (46% assessment in title/description,57% without) rated their practices as moderately effective.

Page 24: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

DO THEY FEEL THE IR ASSESSMENT EFFORTS ARE EFFECT IVE?

Page 25: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

EFFECTIVENESS BY TYPE OF LIBRARY

Page 26: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

PRELIMINARY F INDINGS FROM ANALYSIS OF OPEN-ENDED

QUESTIONS

RESPONSES CODED

1,604CODES

CREATED AND APPLIED

38

Page 27: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

DATA AREAS BEING ASSESSED

460 unique responses were coded.

Two categories of codes:• Data Point/Focus - What is the

thing being measured this is actually increasing or decreasing?

• Area of Assessment - What aspect of the library is being assessed?

Page 28: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

DATA POINT/FOCUS

Page 29: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

ASSESSMENT AREAS BY LIBRARY TYPE

Page 30: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

AREAS ASSESSED

Page 31: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

SERVICES ASSESSED

Page 32: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

SERVICES ASSESSED BY LIBRARY TYPE

Page 33: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

DATA AREAS BEING ASSESSED:TOOLS AND METHODS

2.7%

Page 34: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

HOW ARE THE RESULTS BEING USED?

To track and improve user services and spaces

Most common

response:

• Reporting - Internal and External• Collection Development• Strategic Planning• Staff Performance

Other popular

responses:

• Adherence to Policy• Promotion and Marketing

Less popular

responses:

Page 35: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

HOW ARE THE RESULTS BEING USED?4.8%

Page 36: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

WHAT ARE WE UNABLE TO ASSESS?

In these three main assessment areas:

• Instruction & Information Literacy

• Collections• General Services

MOST EXPRESSED A DESIRE,

BUT DIFFICULTY IN ASSESSING:

• Impact• Correlation• Adequacy• Value-added services

In these three main assessment areas:

• Instruction & Information Literacy

• Collections• General Services

IN THESE THREE MAIN ASSESSMENT

AREAS:• Instruction &

Information Literacy• Collections• General Services

Page 37: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

EXAMPLES OF COMMON CHALLENGESHow can we show direct correlations between library

instruction and student retention/academic

performance?

How effective are ‘one shot’ library instruction

sessions?

How can we build adequate collections

through faculty support and usage data?

How can we evaluate electronic collections using various vendor-

provided data?

Page 38: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

EXAMPLES OF COMMON CHALLENGES

How can libraries prove they are

meeting needs?

Are library services and programs

reaching specific patrons groups?

Are library services and programs

relevant for specific patron groups?

How can libraries prove activities,

collections, services are worth the investment?

How can libraries prove their overall

value to the community/institution

?

Page 39: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

WHAT ARE THE LIMITING FACTORS

IN ASSESSMENT?

Page 40: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

“OTHER” LIMITING FACTORS

FROM ACADEMIC LIBRARIANS:• Difficulty defining measurable goals• Lack of an organized mission statement to

align goals to• No cooperation from teaching faculty

FROM PUBLIC LIBRARIANS:• Trouble with vendor standards• Trouble defining what is being assessed

Page 41: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

DOES TYPE OF LIBRARY AFFECTLIMITING FACTORS?

Page 42: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

DISCUSSIONHow do you address the

common assessment problems in your library?

Do you have a problem not mentioned here?

Are there other obstacles to assessment?

Page 43: Surveying the State of Library Assessment

QUESTIONS?

This presentation is available at:slideshare.net/chtrotter

Presentation graphics by Abbie Gettys - [email protected]

MICHAEL HOLT [email protected]

EMILY [email protected]

LOUISE [email protected]

CRISTINA HERNÁNDEZ TROTTER

[email protected]

COMMENTS?