survey on territorial clustering and high- technology ... · general characteristics, origins and...
TRANSCRIPT
SURVEY ON TERRITORIAL CLUSTERING AND HIGH- TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION
A)
B)
c)
D)
E)
F)
G)
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS, ORIGINS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CAMBRIDGE/OXFORD AS A HIGH-TECH LOCATION
GROWTH AND ACQUISITIONS
INNOVATING ACTIVITY
LINKS WITH THE UNIVERSITY AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS
INTER-FIRM NETWORKS
SCALE AND NETWORKING
O ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 1
A GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS, ORIGINS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Al. Please provide a brief description of your firm’s business activity.
ACTIVITY IA2. Was your firm set up tn provide a specialised product or service for a particular market niche
or set of customers?
YesiNn ~
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO A4)
A3 How important have the following been for your development since start up:
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely unimportant and 5 indicating extremely important
Expanding sales within your original market niche?
❑EXPAND
Diversifying by developing new products/services?DIVERS
A4. In which nf the following areas do you feel your firm’s main competitive advantages Iie?
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely insignificant and 5 indicating highly significant
[CARD]
Price
Marketing and promotion skills
Established reputation
Product/service design
Product/service quality
Technological innovation
Specialised expertise or product
Research & Development
Flair and creativity
Attention and responsiveness to client needsi
COMPADO1
COMPAD02
COMPAD03
COMPAD04
COMPAD05
COMPAD06
COMPAD07
COMPAD08
COMPAD09
COMPAD1O
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 2
AS.
A6.
Al,
As.
Was the firm set up in the Cambridge/Oxford region?
mYesiNO
IF NO (IF YES, GO TO AS)
Where did the firm move from?
I!Ecl
Why did the firm move to Cambridge/Oxford?
m
Was your firm set up by another firm, a spin-off from an existing tirm/institution or anindep~ndent start-up?” - ESTAB1
Another firm
m
Spin-off
n
Independentstart-up n
(ijby unotherjirm - ask A9, ifspirr off- ask Al 1, ifofhcr - ask A 12)
A9. If set up here by another firm, where is that firm based?
m
A 10. Why did it decide to set up this operation here?
-
(GO TO A14)
All
A12
A13
If a spin-off, was this from a firm or a research institution? SPINOFF
Firmn
Research institutionD
If a new start-up (including spin-off) in Cambridge/Oxford, why did the founder(s)choose to locate the firm in the Cambridge/Oxford region?
=
Where was the founder(s) employed immediately previously (location and size of firm,Cambridge/Oxford or other uni;ers;ty department, government-research establishment, etc.)?
nName NAME
nPlace PLACE Size (empt.)
DSIZE
O ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 3
A 14. lf the founder(s) moved to the Cambridge/Oxford region at some stage, was the area’sresidential environment, as a place to live, of any importance in his/her movement decision?
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely insignificant and 5 indicating highly significant.
Importance of residential environmentL!!Xll
A15
A16
A17
A18,
Did the founder possess managerial qualifications, managerial experience, researchqualifications and/or research experience? (lick)
qualifications experience
‘esearcb ~
Managerial
Was your firm formed primarily to develop or exploit a technological idea or innovation?
Yes/’No ESTAB2
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO A18)
What was the source of tbe idea/innovation SOURCE
The university
Tbe founder
The firm which previously employed the founder
Other, please specifyH
What would you say were tbe founders’ motives in setting up the firm?
MOTIVE1MOTIVE2
(Open question, then show following cardj
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely unimportant and 5 indicating very important.
Desire for independence/be own boss
+
MOT1
To make money MOT2
Stimulated by research possibilities and urge to innovate MOT3
Threatened or actual unemploymentI
MOT4
Identified new market opportunity I MOT5
Other, please specify I OTHMOT:MOT6
O ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 4
B CAMBRIDGE/OXFORD AS A HIGH - TECH LOCATION
B1. What would you say are the main advantages to your firm of operating in theCambridge/Oxford region?
ADVANT1ADVANT2
B2. How importanthave tbe following been for your firm’s development?
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely unimportant and 5 indicating extremely important
[CARD] Research links with Cambridge/Oxford University
Research links with other Cambridge/Oxford region firms ororganisations
Informal local access to innovative people, ideas,
technologies
Quality of local research staff
Local availability of research staff
Local availability of managerial/professional staff
Attractive local living environment for staff and directors
Credibility, reputation and prestige of a Cambridge/Oxfordaddress
Proximity to local customers
Proximity to local suppliers, subcontractors
Access to local sources of capital, finance
Availabi Iity of appropriate premises
Access to international airports
Access to London
Advantages of Science Park location
Access to local business services
Supportive local government services
Supportive local training organisations
Local shareholders
DEVELO1 I
EDEVEL02
DEVEL03
DEVEL04
DEVEL05
DEVEL06
DEVEL07
DEVEL08
DEVEL09
F1DEVEL1O
DEVEL1l
[ DEVEL12 I
I DEVEL13 I
I DEVEL14 I
laDEVEL15
DEVEL16
DEVEL17
DEVEL18
DEVEL19
B3 What would you say are the main disadvantages associated with operating in theCambridEe/Oxford region? DISADV1
DISADV2
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 5
B4. Have any of the following constrained the firm’s development?
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely unimportant and 5 indicating extremely important.
[CARD] Lack of appropriate premises locally
Cost of premises locally
Shortage of local skilled Iabour
Shortage of local semiskilled labour
Shortage of local secretarial Iabour
Shortage of local managerial ski Ils
Shortage of local marketing and sales skills
Local planning controls
Housing problems for staff
Transport problems for staff
Inadequate local business services
Lack of local subcontractors
Poor quality of local subcontractors
Absence of government grants
Inadequate/costly environment for manufacturing
Difficulty in accessing local sources of capital, finance
Other (please specify)
=i
CONST02
CONST03
CONST04
CONST05
==--lCONST07 I
-4CONST08
CONST09
CONSTIO ]
=1CONST11
CONST12
CONST13
CONST14
+
CONST15
CONST16
OTHCON:
B5. Since you began operating in the Cambridge/Oxford region, have you transferred anyproduction or research functions to or from locations outside the region? TFL4NS
YEWNO (IF NO, GO TO C)Et6, What were these functions? FUNCI
FUNC2
El, Where were these functionsTo
transferred:TRANS1 From TRANS2
B8. Roughly how many jobs were involved?
mno”fj”bs
f39. Why were they transferred?- e.g. was the transfer a consequence of acquisition, takeover ormerger?
TRANS3TRANS4
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 6
c GROWTH AND ACQUISITION
cl. Have you acquired or merged with any other firm(s) in the last five years?
Yes/No MERGE1
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO C8)
C2. Whatwere your reasons for acquiring/merging?REAS1REAS2
C3 Why did the firm you acquired/merged with agree?REAS3REAS4
C4. How importantwas gaining access to a researchcapability or innovation in your decision toacquire/merge?
score from 1-5 with 1 indicating unimportant and 5 indicating very impnrtant
Research capabi Iity
El
ACCI
Innovation ACC2
C5. How importantin tbe decision to acquire/merge, was the desire to have a subsidiary in theCambridge/Oxford region?
score from 1-5 with 1 indicating unimportant and 5 indicating very important
Importance of subsidiaryH
C6. Would you say that the Cambridge/Oxford subsidiary has grown faster, at the same rate or
slower since takeover than before? GROWTH1
‘astern‘tthesameraten‘]”W”EIIF FASTER OR SLOWER
cl. Why?GROW1GROW2
@ ESRC Centre fnr Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 7
C8.
C9.
Clo
Cll
Have you been acquired by another firm in the past 5 years?
Yes/No MERGE2
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO C14)
What were the motives of the parentfirm?REAS5REAS6
Why did your firm agree?REAS7REAS8
How importantdo you feel your research capability, or an innovation developed by you, wasas a reason for takeover?
score from 1-5 with 1 indicating unimportant and 5 indicating very important
Research capability
Innovation ACC4 II I
C12. Would you say that the Cambridge/Oxford subsidiary has grown faster, at the same rate orslower since takeover than before? GROWTH2
‘astern ‘tthesameraten “owern
IF FASTER OR SLOWER
c13. Why?GROW3GROW4
C 14. Could you please describe your attitude to the possibility of being taken over? ATTIT
Opposedn n“’fav”ur n
Open-minded
C 15. Could you please explain the reasons for your attitude towards takeover.ATT1ATT2
O ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 8
D INNOVATING ACTIVITY
D1. Approximately what proportion of current sales are the result of innovations in products or
services developed by your firm in the last three years?
Sales resulting from innovationsm
D2. What are these innovations?INNOV1INNOV2fNNOV3
D3 How would you rate the originality of these innovations?
Score 1-5 with 1 indicating minor innovations and 5 indicating major innovations:
Originality~
D4, Please indicate the importance of the following as sources for your innovating activities
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely insignificant and 5 indicating highly significant
[CARD]
Within firm
Within organisation
Suppliers of standardised materials andcomponents
Suppliers of customised materials andcomponents
Clients or customers
Competitors in your line of business
Consultancy firms
University/higher education institutes
Other, please specify
Cambridge/ Rest of UK Outside UKOxford
Coxl
COX2 RESTUK2
COX3 RESTUK3 OUTUK3
COX4 RESTUK4 OUTUK4
COX5 RESTUK5 0UTUK5
COX6 RESTUK6 OUTUK6
COX7 RESTUK7 OUTUK7
COX8 RESTUK8 0UTUK8
OTHCOX: OTHREST: OTHOUTCOX9 RESTUK9 OUTUK9
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 9
D5 What were the main barriers to innovation encountered by your firm?Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely insignificant and 5 indicating highly significant
Lack of finance
Prohibitive costs of innovation
Uncertainty/length of pay-off period from innovation
Lack of skilled personnel
Resistance to change within firm
Innovation too easy to copy
Lack of customer responsiveness to new products
Other, please specifj i
BAR1
BAR2
BAR3
BAR4
BARS
BAR6
BAR7
OTHBAR:
P5!---!D6. Has being in the Cambridge/Oxford region helped you to overcome these barriers?
Yes/No OVER
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO E)
D7, How? - OVCM1OVCM2
O ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 10
E
El.
E2.
E3
E4.
LINKS WITH THE UNIVERSITY AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS
Since formation, has the firm had any:research links with a university department or government-funded research establ ishment?.,
ies/NO
local Iinks with universities? YesiNO
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO E13)
Which ones?RESLIN1RESLIN2
Have these links been formal or informal?
Formal/Informal FORMALl
IF FORMAL (IF INFORMAL, GO TO E5)
[CARD] Did such links invnlve:
Academics on the Board
Formal collaborative research projects with Universitydepartments or academics
Formal collaborative research projects with government
research establishments
Part-time secondment by academics working in the company
Research consortia or clubs
University staff acting as consultants
Licensing or patenting of University inventions
Training programmed run by the University
Other, please specify
IF NO INFORMAL LINKS, GO TO E6
E5 Could you please specify the form that these infnrmal links took
INFLIN1INFLIN2
E6. What, specifically, were tbe benefits you derived?
BENEFIT1BENEFIT2
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page I I
LINKS1
UNILINKS
Cam./Ox, other
LINO1 LIN11
LIN02 LIN12
LIN03 LIN 13
LIN04 LIN 14
LIN05 LIN15
LIN06 LIN16
LIN07 LIN17
LIN08 LIN18
OTHLINO: OTHLIN1:
LIN09 LIN19
El. How important were such benefits to the firm’s competitive success?
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely unimportant and 5 indicating extremely important
Es.
E9.
E1O,
eIll utilising these links, have any problems arisen in relation to accessing or using availableinformation?
YesiNO PROBLEM
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO En)
Were problems of Intellectual Property Rights involved?
Yes/No IPR
IF NO (IF YES, GO TO En)
What were the problems involved?
PROB1PROB2
(E9 and E1O, probe toJ7nd OUIhow problems overcome)
E 1I, Have you heard of or had contact with any of the following and, where appropriate, howuseful has this contact been?
institution/ agency
CU. Industrial Liaison andTechnology Transfer Office
Cu. Program meIndustry
C.U. Local Industry(CULIL)
Oxford IndustrialOffice
1S1S Innovation
for
Link
Liaison
Fam
B
r1
d
heard of? (i) had contact? (~) usefulness? ( I-5)
HEARD1 CONTACT1 USE1
HEARD2 CONTACT2 USE2
HEARD3 CONTACT3 USE3
HEARD4 CONTACT4 USE4
I HEARD5 CONTACT5 USE5
E12. lf contact was made, what was the nature of this contact?
CONT1CONT2
OESRCCentre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 12
E13
E14
Ei5
Has your firm ever operated on the Cambridge Science Park, St John’s Innovation Park, or
other university or college site?
Yes/No OPSITE
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO F)
Which site? SITE1SITE2
How helpful, ifat all, were the following?
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating positive disadvantage and 5 indicating very helpful.
E16
E17
E18
[CARD] Flexibility of licensing/leasing of premises I HELP1 I
Premises cost
E
HELP2
Car parking availabilityHELP3
Consultancy adviceHELP4
Image and conferred credibilityHELP5
Availability of shared facilitiesHELP6
Opportunities to talk/network with other firmsHELP7
Base to form (exploit) links with the University.HELP8
Were there any disadvantages to operating on the park or site involved?
YesiNO DISITE
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO E18)
Please specify the nature of these disadvantages?
DISADV3DISADV4
If the firm is no longer on a park or site, why did you move?
WHYMOV1WHYMOV2
@ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page I3
F INTER-FIRM NETWORKS
Ft. Do you have any close links with other firms within the Cambridge/Oxford region?
YesiNO LINKS2
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO F3)
F2. What is the nattrreof these links?REGLIN1RRGLIN2
F3 How important are local links with the following and how important is close geographical
proximity to the developmentlmaintenance of such links?
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely unimportant and 5 indicating highly important.
[CARD]
Customers?
Suppliers or subcontractors?
Firms providing services?
Research collaborators?
Firms in your line ofbusiness?
Others, please specify
importance of 1inks
I LOCALI I
I LOCAL2 I
LOCALS II OTHLOC: I
importance of
proximity
H
PROX1
PROX2
PROX3
PROX4
PROX5
HLOCAL6
F4. How importantare links with firms outside the Cambridge/Oxford region, would any of these
Iinks be more useful if the firms were inside the Cambridge/Oxfordregion?
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely unimportant and 5 indicating highly important.
[CARD]
Customers?
Suppliers or subcontractors?
Firms providing services?
Research collaborators?
Firms in your line of
business?
Others, please specify
importance of links
outside region(1-5)
increasedusefulness if links
inside regiou (i)
3OUTREG1
0UTREG2
0UTREG3
0UTREG4
OUTREG5
===---l4
INREG1
INREG2
INREG3
INREG4
INREG5
==----lOUTREG6
@ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page I4
F5, [n general, for what kinds of links is geographical proximity not important?
GEOLIN1GEOLIN2
(F6. Where links are important, which of the following do you consider to be the main benefits?Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely insignificant and 5 indicating highly significant
(ifnorre, go to Fll)
[CARD] Improving the amount of available information about new
i
BEN1products and processes
Improving the quality of information available about new BEN2products and processes
Improving access to research findings BEN3
Assuring a satisfactory quality of supplies BEN4
Assuring the timely delivery of supplies BEN5
Allowing youtobe more responsive to market requirements BEN6
More effective or innovative R&D. BEN7
Other, please specifi OTHBEN:BEN8
F7. Inyourview, which of theabove benefits aremore easilvgainedfro1m Iinkswith tirmswithirr,=the”Cambridge/Oxford region (please tick):
[CARD] Improving the amount of available information about new
products and processes
improving the quality of information available about newproducts and processes
Improving access to research tindings
Assuring a satisfactory quality of supplies
Assuring the timely delivery of supplies
Allowing you to be more responsive to market requirements
More effective or innovative R&D.
Other, please specify 4EAS1
EAS2
EAS3
EAS4
EAS5
EAS6
EAS7
EAS8I I
F8. Where close relations have been established, what doyousee asthemain risks of such links?Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely insignificant and 5 indicating highly significant
Loss of property rights in new products and processes
Loss of control of confidential business information
Over-reliance/dependence on specific firms
Other, please specify
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
RISK3 I
Page 15
F9. Are any of these risks reduced where the links are with local firms? (please tick)
Loss of property rights in new products and processes
E
REDUC1
Loss of control of confidential business information REDUC2
Over-reliance/dependence on specific finms REDUC3
Other, please specify REDUC4
FIO. How (else) do you think these risks maybe reducedScore from 1-5 with 1 indicating completely insignificant and 5 indicating highly significant
F1l.
F12.
F13,
F14.
F15.
F16.
Carefully drawn legally binding contracts
E
HOWRED1
Strictobservance of the termsand conditions of contract HOWRED2
Personal relationships HOWRED3
Experience of fair trading HOWRED4
Long term business relationships HOWRED5
Other, please specify OTHRED:HOWRED6
Have any people who left this company formed their own businesses?
Yes/No OWN
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO F15)
Are they in the Cambridge/Oxford region?
Yes/No COXREG
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO F15)
What is the business? FIRM1
FIRM2
Do you have any continuing links, formal or informal, with the people involved?
Formal: YesiNo Informal: YesiNO FORMAL2
[f yes, what is the nature of these links? EMPLIN1EMPLIN2
Do you actively recruit technical and scientific staff from within the Cambridge/Oxford
region?
YesiNO RECRUIT
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO F17)
What are the advantages of recruiting tecbnica[/scientific staff from the Cambridge/Oxfordregion? ADVANT3
ADVANT4
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 16
F17. Do any links exist between your firm and any other firms because of people who have movedbetween these firms?
Yes/No PEOPLE
IF YES (IF NO, GO TO F19)
F18. How valuable have such links been to the firm:
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating not valuable at all and 5 indicating very valuable
m
F19. How often do you have an opportunity to mix informally with managers or professionalsfrom:
(Please tick) Never Occasionally Frequently
Other local companies?
Cambridge/Oxford university departments?
Government funded local researchlaboratories?
=~~
F20. Have you received help/advice from any local agencies (government sponsored or otherwise)
over the last five years? ~lease tick][CARD]Cambridge:
CamsTECH
Cambridgeshire UN1’f
District or City Councils
Cambridge Chamber oi
Commerce
Cambridge Enterprise Agency
Fen BET
DT1 (Enterprise Initiative)
Others, please specify
Oxford:
:
CAMO1 The Oxford Trust
CAM02 District or City Councils
CAM03 Heartof England Training andEnterpriseCouncil
CAM04 Oxford and District Chamber of
Commerce
CAM05 Research and Science Based Industry
Group
CAM06 Oxford College-Small Business Centre
CAM07 North Oxford Business Venture Ltd
(NORBIS)
OTHCAM: Thames Business advice CentreCAM08 (TBAC)
dEnterprise agencies
Others, pIease specify
F21. How useful was this help/advice?
-10X02
0X03
a0X04
0X05
0X06
0X07
0X08
0X09
OTHOX:oxlo
Score from 1-5 with 1 indicating not valuable at all and 5 indicating very valuablem J
O ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page I7
G SCALE AND NETWORKING
G]. Ideally, would you prefer your firm to grow larger, smaller or remain the same size?GROWTH3
Larger msma”er msamesize
IF LARGER (IF SMALLER, GO TO G6 - IF SAME SIZE, GO TO G1O)
G2, What, ill your view, would be the main advantages of being larger?
score from 1-5 with 1 indicating unimportant and 5 indicating very important
Access to resources to develop products/processes
Achievement of economies of scale
Improved bargaining/contracting position with respect to other firms
Ability to diversify
Become less reliant upon outside tirms/institutions (e.g. suppliers)
Bigger capitalisation from ‘selling on’ the firm
Increase market presence
Other, please specify
G3. What, in your view, would be the main disadvantages of being larger?
score from 1-5 with 1 indicating unimportant and 5 indicating very important
Increased inflexibi Iity
Loss ofgoodwill/morale within the firm
Reduction in director’s independence or control
Increased risk arising from need to obtain extra capital
Other, please specifi
G4. [To be filled in by [he interviewer] For thetwo highest scores given (in either G2 or G3),
Do these advantages or disadvantages stemcosts
primarily from (a reduction or increase in):
uncertainty
power
ILARGO1
LARG02
LARG03
LARG04
LARG05
LARG06
LARG07
OTHLG1:LARG08
H=
LARG11
LARG12
LARG13
LARG 14
0THLAG2:LARG 15
2nd
O ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 18
G5. Would it be possible, in your opinion, to either gain these advantages (G2) or avoid thedisadvantages (G3) by securing linkages or special relationships with other Incal
tirms/institutions?
Yes/No GAIN1
If No - why not?GNO1GN02
If Yes - how?
GN03GN04
(END)
G6, What, in your view, would be the main advantages of being smal Ier?
score from 1-5 with 1 indicating unimportant and 5 indicating very important
Increasedflexibility
Increasedgoodwill/morale within the firm (staff commitment)
Increased director’s independence and control
Reduced dependence on outside funds/capital
Other, please specify
G7 What are the main disadvantages of being smaller’?
score from 1-5 with 1 indicating unimportant and 5 indicating very important
Reduced access to resources to develop products/processes
Inability to secure economies of scale
Subordinate bargaining/contracting positioo with respect to other firms
Inability to diversify
Increased dependence upon other firms/institutions
Reduced capitalisation from ‘selling on’ the firm
Reduced market presence
Other, please specify
SMAL1l
SMAL12
SMAL13
SMAL14
0THSM2:SMAL15
SMALO1 1
aSMAL02
SMAL03
SMAL04
SMAL05
SMAL06
SMAL07
OTHSM1 :SMAL08
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 19
G8, [to be completed by the interviewer] For the two highest scores given (in either G6 or G7)
1st 2nd
Do these advantages or disadvantages ste]m
primarily from (a reduction or increase in): costs
uncertainty
powerHH
G9. Would it he possible, in your opinion, to either gain these advantages or avoid any of thesedisadvantages by securing special relationships with other local tirms/institutions?
YesiNO GAIN2
[f no, why not?
GN05GN06
GN07
GN08
(END)
GI O. Which of the following do you consider to be the main advantages to remaining the same
size?
score from 1-5 with 1 indicating unimportant and 5 indicating very important
[f yes, how?
[CARDj
Maintaining: Flexibility
goodwi [l/morale within the firm (staff com]mitment)
director’s independence and control
Independence from outside funds/capital
access to resources to develop products/processes
economies of scale
bargaining/contracting position with respect to other firms
ability to diversify
Independence from other tirms/institutions
Other, please specify
G ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 20
SAMEO1
SAME02
SAME03
SAME04
SAME05
SAME06
SAME07
SAME08
SAME09
OTHSA1 :SAME lO
G I I, What in your opinion are the main disadvantages of remaining the same size?
score from 1-5 with 1 indicating unimportant and 5 indicating very important
[CARD]
Lack of flexibility
goodwill/morale within the firm (staff commitment)
director’s independence and control
independence from outside funds/capital
access to resources to develop products/processes
economies of scale
bargaining/contracting position with respect to other firms
ability to diversify aSAME11
SAME12
SAME13
SAME14
SAME15
SAME16
SAME17
SAME18
independence from other firms/institutions
m
SAME19
Other,please specify 0THSA2:SAME20
G12. [To be completed by the inter-viewer] For the two highest scores given (in either G 10 orGil)
ISt 2nd
Do these advantages or disadvantages stemcosts
primarily from (a reduction or increase in):
uncertainty
powerHH
G13 Would it be possible, in your opinion, to either gain these advantages or avoid any of thesedisadvantages by securing special relationships with other local firms/institutions?
Yes/No GAIN3
If no, why not?
GN09GN1O
If yes, how?GN11GN12
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Page 21
PRE INTERVIEW FACT SHEET
NOTE: The Cambridge firms answered this questionnaire in relation to Cambridge andthe Oxford firms in relation to Oxford.
DzElP]. 1s your firm:
1-1oo
I Cambridge, 2 Oxford
I INDEP I I an independent company, Oa subsidiary
P2. In what year did your firm begin trading?
m
P3 When did it begin operations in the Cambridge (Oxford) region
~
P4. If subsidiary, is tbe parent firm UK or foreign owned?
I UK ] 1 UK,2 foreig”,3 both
P5, What was the size of your firm in terms of turnover, expofis, employment and
number of sites operated in 1995 and in 1990?
Turnover f(OOOs)=
IExports i(OOOs) EXP95 EXP90
Employment (including part-timers and working directors)
Number of sites (including headquarters or main site)
=
P6, If you have other sites in addition to this one, where are they, and what do they do?
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
P7. Approximately what proportion of your sales are made to the following areas?
% I995 “/0 I 990
Cambridge (Oxford) region S95PC1 S90PC1
Rest of East Anglia (Oxfordshire) and South East
EnglandS95PC2 S90PC2
Rest of UK S95PC3 S90PC3
Rest of Europe S95PC4 S90PC4
Rest of World S95PC5 S90PC5
P8. Approximately what proportion of your purchases (materials, components, services)come from the following areas?
% I995 “/0 I 990
Cambridge (Oxford) region P95PC1 P90PCI
Rest of East Anglia (Oxfordshire) and South EastEngland
P95PC2 P90PC2
Rest of UK P95PC3 P90PC3
Rest of Europe P95PC4 P90PC4
Rest of World P95PC5 P90PC5
P9. Approximate y what proportion, if an y, of your collaborative research activity withother ftrms is with firms in the following areas?
Cambridge (Oxford) region
Rest of East Anglia (Oxfordshire) and SouthEast England
Rest of UK
Rest of Europe
Rest of World
% ,995 I %,990 I
4R95PC1 R90PC1
R95PC2 R90PC2
R95PC3 R90PC3
=+-==-l
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Plo. How many workers do you have in the following categories?
I Number of Employees I Full-Time I Part-Time ]
Semi-skilled and unskilled manual FULL1 PART1
Skilled manual FULL2 PART2
Clerical and administrative FULL3 PART3
Technicians and lower professionals FULL4 PART4
Technologists, scientists and higher professionals FULL5 PARTS
Managerial (including working directors) FULL6 PART6
Total number of employees TOTF TOTP
Ph. Approximately what proportion of your research staff and directors/senio]management have university degrees or their equivalent?
O/. with degrees O/.with Cambridge(Oxford) degrees
:~=’:ff ❑ B
P12. Could you tell us where the last 3 research/management staff you recruited camefrom?
Cambridge (Oxford) university
Other Cambridge (Oxford) region
firms
Other Cambridge (Oxford) regionorganisations
Other UK universities
Elresearch
RES1
RES2
RES3
mOther UK firms/organisations
Overseas universities
Overseas firms/Organizations HRES5
RES6
RES7
Hmanagement
MAN1
MAN2
ElMAN3
MAN4
MAN5
MAN6
MAN7
@ ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
P13, In which of the following areas have you used external firms or services during the[ast tive years? (Please tick where appropriate)
For those ticked, to what extent have you used firms from the Cambridge (Oxford)region as opposed to firms located elsewhere, such as London? How do you rate the
quality of the service or advice provided?
Store ji’om 1-5 with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 irrdicut ing hiRh qua lily
FI
Accountancy AREAO1
Banking AREA02
VentureCapital AREA03
Legal Services AREA04
Management consultants AREA05
Public relations AREA06
Personnel & recruitment AREA07
Advertising AREA08
Marketresearch AREA09
Marketing AREAlO
Computer services AREAl 1
Design/printing services AREA12
Other (please specify) OTHAREAAREA13
0/, to which you usedlocal as opposed to non-
local firms?
LOCO1
LOC02
LOC03
LOC04
LOC05
LOC06
LOC07
LOC08
LOC09
LOC1O
LOC1l
LOC12
LOC13
lfyou used local firms,bow do you rate tbe
quality of service oradvice provided? (Onscale 1-S)
QUALO1
QUAL02
QUAL03
QUAL04
QUAL05
QUAL06
QUAL07
QUAL08
QUAL09
QUAL1O
QUAL1l
QUAL12
QUAL13
Cl ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 1995
Question~umber VariableName Value VafiableLabel Remarks
ID
WHERE 12
CambridgeOxford
1980SICcodes (4-digit)A! ACTIVITY -1 missing
AZ SPECIAL 1
0-1
-9
Yes
NomissingDIK
A3 EXPANDOPJERS
1-5
-1-99
scoredmissingnla
if flcked, put flck .>5
blank ->1
iftickec, put tick ->5blank ->1
1-5.1
A4 COMPADO1-f O scoredmissing
A5 OXBRIDGE Yes
Nomlssmg
DIK
1
0-1-9
A6 FROM missingnla
Open Code
Open Codes
-1
-99
A7 WHYTOIWHYT02
A8 ESTABI
-1
-99
missingnla
12
FirmSpin-offIndep
missingD/K
3
-1-9
missingnla
Open Code
Open Codes
A9 BASE -1
-99
AlO WHYHEREIWHYHERE2
Al 1 SPINOFF
-1
-99
mssingnla
12
-1-9
-99
FirmResearch instmissing
D/Knla
missing Open Codesnla
A12 WHYHERE3WHYHERE4
A13 NAME
-1
-99
missing Open Codenla
-1
-99
PIACE -1
-99
missing Open Codenla
SIZE -1
-99
missmg numbers
nla
scored if blank and, founder fived here’ put-99
missing ifticked, put tick ->5
nla blank ->1
.414 RESENV 1-5
-1-99
QuestionNumber Variable Name Value Variable Label Remarks
Al 5 QUALI QUAL2 1 fick if ALL missing put all -1
EXPRI, EXPR2 o blank if scored, put 3,4,5-> tick1,2 -> blank
A16 ESTAB2 1 Yes
o No
-1 missing
-9 DIK
1 Univ2 Founder
3 Firm
4-20 Open Codes
Al 7 SOURCE
-1
-9-99
missing
DIKnla
A18 MOTIVE IMOTIVE2
MOTI -6
-1 missing Open Codesif MOTIVEI =0 then MOTIVE2 =-1
1-5-1
scoredmissing
missing
if ticked, put tick ->5blank ->1
Open CodeMOT6=-I when OTHMOT=-I
OTHMOT
mmslng Open Codes
if ADVANTI =0 then ADVANT2=-IBI ADVANTI
ADVANT2
B2 DEVELOI-19 1-5-1
if ficked, put tick ->5
blank ->1scoredmissmg
B3 OISADV1DISADV2
B4 CONSTO1-17
-1 m)ssing Open Codesif DISADV1 =0 or +99 then DISADV2=-I
1-5-f
scoredmissing
if ticked, put tick ->5
blank ->1
Open CodeCONSTI 7=-1 when OTHCON=-’
OTHCON missing
B5 TRANS 10
-1
-9
YesNomissing
DIK
B6 FUNCI
FUNC2
missingnla
-1
-99
B7 TRANSITRANS2
missing TRANSI -tO
TRANS2 - from
numbers
-1
-99 nla
B8 JOBS -1
-99
missingnla
ODen CodesB9 TRANS3TRANS4
-1
-99
missingnla
Yes
Nocl MERGEI 1
0-1-9
missinaDIK -
QuestionNumber Variable Name Value Variable Label Remarks
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
Clo
Cll
C12
REASIREAS2
-1 missing
nia
Open Codes
Open Codes
if ticked, put tick ->5blank.> 1
if ticked, put tick ->5blank.> 1
-99
REAS3
REAS4
-1 missing
nla-99
ACCI
ACC2
1-5
-1
-99
scoredmissing
nla
1-5-4
-99
scoredmissmg
nia
GROWTH1 12
3-1
-9
Faster
SameSlower
missmgDIKnla-99
GROWI
GROW2
-1
-99
mlssmg
nla
Open Codes
10
-1-9
Yes
Nomissing
DIK
Open Codes
Open Codes
if ticked, put tick ->5blank-> 1
REAS5
REAS6
-1
-99
missingnla
REAS7REAS8
-1
-99
missmgnla
1-5-1
ACC3ACC4
scored
missingnla-99
GRowrH2 1
23
FasterSame
Slower
-1-9
-99
D/K -
nla
C13 GROW3GROW4
-1-99
mlssmg
nla
Open Codes
C14 ATTIT 1
23
-1
-9
Open
In favourmissing
O/K
C15 ATTfATT2
-1 missing Open Codes
percentsif SALES=O, all section Dis often
(but not always) blank
if it is Iefl blank, put -99 for section D
DI SALES -1 missimg
QuestionNumber Variable Name Value Variabke Label Remarks
D2 INNOV1INNOV2
INNOV3
D3 ORIG
-1
-99
missingnla
Open CodesiflNNOVl =Oor+99 then INNOV2 ,3=-I
-99 n/a if SALES=O and blank
1-5
-1-99
scoredmissingnla
-99 nla if SALES=O and blank
ifticked, put tick ->5
blank -> !
1-5-1
-99
-99 nla if SALES=O and blankif ticked, put tick ->5
blank -> i
D4 COXI-9 scoredmissing
nia
OTHCOX -1
-99
mmsingnla
Open CodeCOX9=-1 when OTHCOX=-I-99 nla if SALES=O and blank
RESTUK2-9 1-5-1
-99
-99 nla if SALES=O and blankif ticked, put tick .>5
blank ->1
scoredmissingnla
OTHREST -1-99
missing
nla
Open Code
RESTUK9=-I when OTHREST=-I-99 n)a if SALES=O and blank
0UTUK2-9 1-5
-1-99
-99 nla if SALES=O and blankifticked, put tick ->5
blank ->1
scoredmissing
nla
missing Open Code0uTUK9=-I when OTHOUT=-I-99 nla if SALES=O and blank
-1
-99
oTHOUT
D5 BAR1-8
OTHBAR
D6 oVER
nla
scoredi -5-1
-99
-99 nla if SALES=O and blank
if flcked, put tick ->5blank ->1
missingnla
missing Open CodeBAR8=-I when OTHBAR=-1
-99 nla if SALES=O and blank
-1-99 nla
1
0
-T-9
-99
Yes
NomissingD/K
nla
-99 n/a if SALES=O and blank
D7 OVCMI0VCM2
missing
nlaOpen Codes-99 nla if SALES=O and blank
or OVER=•
-1-99
YesNo
missingDIK
El LINKSI 1
0
-1
-9
Yes
NomlssmgDIK
El UNILINKS 1
0
-1-9
E2 RESLINI
RESLIN2
missingnla
Open Codes-1-99
Question~umber Vatiable Name Value Variable Label Remarks
E3 FORMALl 1
23
-i
-9-99
Formal
Informal
BothmissingD/K
nla
E4 LINOI-09 1
0
-99
tickblank
nla
if ALL missing (BOTH COIS)put all.1
if scored, put 3,4,5 .> tick1,2 .> blank
OTHLINO -1-99
missingnla
Open CodeLIN09=0 when OTHLINO=-1
LINII-19 {o
-99
tick
blanknla
if ALL missing (BOTH COIS)put all .1if scored, put 3,4,5 -> tick
1,2 -> blank
OTHLINI -1
-99
missing
nla
Open CodeLINi 9=0 when OTHLINI=-I
E5 INFLINIINFLIN2
E6 BENEFITIBENEFIT2
E7 COMP
-1
-99
missingnla
Open Codes
-1
-99
missingnla
Open Codesif BENEFITl=O then BENEFIT2..I
1-6-1
-99
scored
missingnta
ifticked, put tick ->5blank -71
E8 PROBLEM 1 YesNo
missingD/K
nla
o
-1
-9-99
E9 !PR 1
0
YesNomissingD/K
nla
-1-9
-99
E1O PROB1PROB2
-f-99
Open Codesif PROBl=O then PROB2=-Inla
tickblanknia
Eli HEARDI-5 1
0
-99
if ALL missing put all.1if scored, put 3,4,5 -> tick
1,2 -> blankHEARD I ,2,3 answered only by CAMBRIDGE
therefore HEARDI .2.3 eo .99 when WHERE.2HEARD4,5 answered only by OXFOROtherefore HEAR04,5 eq .99 when WHERE. I
CONTACTI-5 10
-1
-99
tick
blankmissingnla
ne -99 if HEARO.I=-99 if HEARD=O=-1 if HEARO=-t
if scored, put 3,4,5 -> tick1,2 -> blank
Question~umber Variable Name Value Variable Label Remarks
USEI-5 1-5-1
-99
scoredmwsmgnla
ne -99 if CONTACT= I=-99 if CONTACT= .99 or O=-1 if CONTACT=-f
if ticked, put tick ->5blank -> f
E12 CONTICONT2
-1-99
missingnla
Open Codesif blank & all CONTACT= -99 or O Dut -99
if blank &all CONTACT=-f put-fif blank &any CONTACT=l put-1
E13 OPSITE 1
0
-1
-9
Yes
No
DIK
Ef4 SITE ISITE2
E15 HELP1-8
-1 missingnla
Open Codes-99
1-5
-1
-99
scored
mwsingnla
ifticked, puttick ->5
blank ->1
E16 DISITE Yes
No
1
0
-1
-9-99
D/K “n!a
E17 DISADV3
DISADV4
-1
-99
missingnla
Open Codesif DlSADV3=0 then DISAOV4 =-I
E18 WHYMOV!WHYMOV2
Open Codesif blank put -99
F1 LINKS2 Yes
Nom(sslngD/K
1
0
-1
-9
F2 REGLINIREGLIN2
Open Codesif REGLINl=O then REGLIN2=-I
-1
-99 nla
F3 LOCAL I -6 1-5.1
if NONE written put all 1
if ticked, put tick ->5blank ->1
missing
OTHLOC
PROXI-6
Open Code
LOCAL6=-I when OTHLOC=-I
1-5
-1
PROXn=-1 when LOCALn=-f
PRoX6=.I when OTHLOC=-Iif NONE written put all 1
if ticked, put tick ->5blank-> f
missing
Question~umber Variable Name Value Variable Label Remarks
F4 0UTREG7-6 1-5 scored
-1 missing
OTHREG -1 missing
INREGI-6 1 ticko blank
F5 GEOLINIGEOLIN2
F6 BENI-8
OTHBEN
F7 EASI-8
F8 RISKI-4
OTHRISK
F9 REDUCI-4
FIO HOWREDI-6
OTHRED
F11 OWN
F12 COXREG
-1 mwstng
1-5 scored-1 missing
-1 missing
1 tick
o blank
-1 missing-99 nla
1-5 scored-1 missing
-1 missing
1 tick
o blank-99 nla
1-5
-1-99
-1-99
1
0
-1
-9
10
-1
-9-99
scoredmissing
nla
missing
nla
YesNo
missingDIK
Yes
NomissingD/Knla
if NONE written put all 1if ticked, put tick ->5
blank ->1Open Code
0UTREG6=.I when OTHREG=-I
lNREGn..l when OUTREGn=-1
INREG6=0 when OTHREG=.Iif ALL missing put all -1
if NONE written put all Oif scored, put 3,4,5-> tick
1,2 -> blank
ODen Codes
if NONE written put all 1if ticked, put tick ->5
blank -> f
Open CodeBEN8z-I when OTHBEN=-1
EASn=-1 when BENn..lEAS8=0 when OTHBEN=-I
if ALL missing put all -1if NONE written put all Oif scored, put 3,4,5-> tick
1,2 -> blank
if NONE written put all 1if ticked, put tick ->5
blank ->1
Open CodeRlSK4=-f when OTHRISK=.I
REOUCn=.1 when RISKn=-f
REDUC4=0 when OTHRISK=-Iif ALL missing put all -1
if NONE written put all Oif scored, put 3,4,5-> tick
f,2 .> blank
if NONE wfltten put all 1if ticked, put tick ->5
blank ->1
Open CodeHOWRED6=-I when OTHREO.-I
Question~umber Variable Name Value Variable Label Remarks
F13 FIRMI -1
FIRM2 -99
missingnla
Open Codesif FIRMf=O then FIRM2=-I
F14 FORMAL2 o
12
3-1
-99
NeitherFormal
InformalBothmissing
nla
missmgnla
EMPLINIEMPLIN2
-1
-99
Open Codes
F15 RECRUIT 1
0
-1
-9
Yes
Nomissing
DIK
missing
nlaFt6 ADVANT3
ADVANT4
F17 PEOPLE
-1
-99
Open Codesif ADVANT3=0 then ADVANT4=-I
1
0
-1-9
YesNomissing
D/K
F18 VALUE1 1-5-1
-99
scoredmissing
nla
if ticked, put tick ->5blank.> 1
FI 9 OFTI0FT2
OFT3
NeverOccasionFreq
mlssmgD/K
2
3-1
-9
answered only by CAMBRIDGEtherefore all eq -99 when WHERE=2
if ALL missing put all -1if NONE wtitten put all Oif scored, put 3,4,5-> tick
1,2 -> blankOpen CodeCAM08=0 when OTHCAM=-1
answered only by OXFORD
therefore all eq -99 when WHERE=fif ALL missing put all -1if NONE written put all Oif scored, put 3,4,5 -> tick
Open CodeOXIO=O when OTHOX=-I
if ALL CAMor ALL OX=-l put-1
if ALL CAM or ALL OX=O (for NONE) put -99ifticked, put tick ->5
blank.> 1
F20 CAM OI-08 1
0
-99
tickblank
nla
OTHCAM
Oxol-lo
-1
-99
mlssmgnla
tick
blankmissingn)a
T
o
-1
-99
-1-99
missing
nlaOTHOX
F2 i VALUE2 1-5-1
-99
scoredmtssmgnla
GI GROWTH3 12
3-f-9
LargerSmallerSame
mw.mgD/K
Question~umber Variable Name Value Variable Label Remarks
G2 LARGOI-08 1-5
-1-99
scored if NONE written put all 1iflicked, put tick ->5
blank-> f
missing
nla
oTHLG1 -1
-99
missing Open CodeLARG08=-I when OTHLGI =-1nla
G3 LARGI1-15 1-5-1
-99
$cored if NONE written put all 1
ifticked, put tick ->5blank ->1
missingnla
mlsslng
nla
Open CodeLARGI 5=-T when 0TH LG2=-I
-1-99
0THLG2
G4 Not coded
G5 GAIN I Yes
No
missingOIKnla
10
-1-9
-99
GNOI
GN02
GN03
GN04
G6 SMALII-15
mlsww Open Codes (if NO)if GNO1 =0 then GN02=-I
-1-99
-1-99
1-5-1
-99
nla
mwstng
nla
Open Codes (if YES)
scored if NONE written put all iifticked, put tick ->5
blank ->1mlssin~nla -
0THSM2 missing“la
Open CodeSMALI 5=-1 when 0TH SM2=-I
-1-99
1-5-1
-99
-1
-99
G7 SMALO1-08 scored if NONE written put all 1if ticked, put tick ->5
blank ->1missingnla
missingrlla
Open CodeSMAL08=.I when OTHSMI =-1
OTHSMI
G8 Not coded
G9 GAIN2 1 YesNo
missingD/K
nla
o
-1
-9
-99
GN05GN06
GN07GN08
GtO SAMEOI-10
-1-99
mssing
nla
Open Codes (if NO)if GN05=0 then GN06=-f
Open Codes (if YES)-1
-99
missing
nla
1-5-1
-99
if NONE written putd 1ifticked, puttick ->5
blank ->1
scored
missingnla
OTHSAI -1
-99
missingnla
Open CodeSAM EfO=-1 when OTHSAI =-1
Question~umber Variable Name Value Variable Label Remarks
GI 1 SAMEI 1-20 1-5-1
-99
0THSA2 -1
-99
scoredmissingnla
if NONE written put all 1
if ticked, put tick .> 5blank ->1
missingnla
Open Code
SAME20=-I when 0THSA2=-I
G12 Not coded
G13 GAIN3 1
0-1-9
-99
Yes
No
missingOIKnia
GN09GNIO
Open Codes (if NO)if GN09=0 then GNIO=-1
-1-99
missing
nla
missing Open Codes (if YES)GNI 1GN12
-1-99
01
2-1
-9
-1
n[a
PI INDEP SubsidIndep
.ASsocmissingOIK
P2 YEAR
P3 OPREG
P4 UK
mlssmg year -4 digits
year. 4 digits-1 mwsing
UKForeignBoth
f23
-1
-99
missingnla
P5 TURN95, 90 thth
if NONE written, or dash, put O
if blank put -1if n,000 written, enter as isifnM written, enter n,000
ifnK writlen, enternif EXP given as% (of TURN), convert tonosVAR90 = -99 nla if firm estab after 1990
EXP95, 90EMPL95. 90 missing-1
-99SITES95,90 nia
missingnla
P6 wHERE1
WHATIWHERE2WHAT2
Open Codesif blank, or NONE written, PLI-99
-1
-99
missing odds =0can be all O
if NONE wtitten, or dash, PU1Oif ALL missing (per separate COI)put all -1if NONE written put all O
if N/A written Put all -99VAR90 = -99 nla If firm estab afler 1990if SUM ne 100 enter as is with blanks=O
P7 S95PC1-5S90PCI-5
%%
%%
P8 P95PC1-5
P90PCI-5
P9 R95PCI-5
R90PCI-5
%%-1 m(ssmg
nla-99
QuestionNumber Variable Name Value Variable Label Remarks
Plo FULL1-6, TOTF -1PARTI -6, TOTP
PI 1 STAFFI.6 %-1
-9-99
P12 RESI-7MAN I-7
P13 AREAol -13
OTHAREA
LOCOI-13
QUALOI-13
10
-1-99
10
-1
-i
%-f
-99
1-5.1
missing
missing
D/Knla
tickblankmissing
nla
tickblankmissing
missing
missing
nla
scoredmlssmgnla
put as given even if wrong -if ALL missing (both COIS)put all -1
all PART blank but FULL entered, put PART=OTOT ody given, enter TOT& put rest =-<
missing odds =0if NONE written, or dash, put O
if ALL missing (both COIS)put all -1if no such employees, or NIA given, put -99
if DIK given, put -9if n persons given, convert to 0/0if poss,
otherwise put -1
if ALL missing (per separate COI)put all -1if no such employees, or NIA given, put .99
if ALL missing put all -1
Open Code
AREA? 3=0 when OTHAREA=-IAREA13=-I when OTHAREA=-f 8ALLAREAOI-12=.I
ne -99 if AREA=l=-99 if AREA=O
(also usually =-t if AREA=-I )
ne -99 if LOC ne -99
=-99 if LOC=-99 or O
(also usually =-1 if LOC=-I )
Question
NumberVariable Name and Label
Eligible toCases included
answerMissing cases Minimum Maximum
F“A5
A6
A?
Total samplw,lOC N N % N ‘/.WHERE Is your firm in Cambridge or Oxford? 100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1
Al2
ACTIVIN SIC codes of firm’s business activity 100 98 98.0” 2AZ
2.0 2570 9400SPECIAL Firm set up to provide a specialised product or sewice? 100 100 100.0 0
A30.0 0“”1
EXPANO How impo!tant have expanding sales been? 79 ““77 97.5 2 2.5 “1DIVERS How important has diversifying been?
5
79 __79A4
100,0 0 0.0 1 5COMPADO1 Your competitive advantages: price 100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1 5-”COMPAD02 Your competitive advantages: marketing & promotion 100 100 100.0 0COMPAO03 Your competitive advantages established reputation
0.0 1 5“100 ‘- Inn 1000 n nil ““” 1
COMPAD04 Your competitive advantages: productlservice design
K
100COMPAO05 Your competitive advantages: productlsewice quality 100COMPAD06 Your competitive advantages: technological innovation 100COMPAD07 Your competitive advantages: special expertise or product 100COMPAO08 Your competitive advantages: R & D 100
~OMPAD09 Your competitive advantages flair& creativity 100COMPAD1 O Your competitive advantage; attention & responsiveness.— 100
FAsA9
AlO
Al 1
A12
Al 3
A14
A15
A16
OXBRIOGE Firm setup in the Cambridge/Oxford region?
FROM Where did your firm move from?
WHYTOl Why did your firm move to Cambridge/Oxford?
WHYT02 Why did your firm move to Cambridge/Oxford?
ESTAB1 Firm setup by another fmn/as spin-o ffhndep stati-up?
BASE Where is that firm based?
WHYHERE1 Why did it decide to set up here?
WHYHERE2 Why did it decide to set up here?
SPINOFF Was this a spin-off from a firm or a research institution?
WHYHERE3 Why did the founder locate in Cambridge/Oxford?
WHYHERE4 Why did the founder locate in Cambridge/Oxford?
NAME Name of foundets previous firm
PLACE Location of foundefs previous firm
SIZE Size of foundets previous firm (employment)
RESENV Is residential environfient important?
QUALI Does the founder possess managerial qualifications?
QUAL2 Does the founder possess research qualifications?
EXPR1 Ooes the founder possess managerial experience?
EXPR2 Does the founder possess research exparien~”?
ESTAB2 Firm founded to develop technical innovation?
..-100
100
100
100-
100
100
98
._ . ..- -..100.0 0 0.0
:-::1’5”
100.0 0 0.0 15”100.0 ‘“ o 0.0 1 5100.0 0 0.0..—. 1 5100.0 0 o.o–l’5-
100.0 0 0,0 1 5
98.0 2 2.0 1 5“
0 0.0 0 1
1 9.1 1 6
100 100 100.011 10 90.911 10 90.911 4 36 ‘
1 !w ~ 17 I-.. ,,4 7 63.6 6 22
100 ‘-”100..—
100.0 0 0.0 1 316 16 100.0 0 0.0 1 1516 15 ‘“ 93.8 1 6.3 1 2416 4 25,0 “- 12 75.0 12 20
1
=1
;... . ; .;: ._. ~... : ;5 1. ;. .+1
64 ““ 79 94.0 5 6.0 n In84 75 89.3
84 34 40.!
74 59
.-9 107 1“ 12 I.-
5 50 59.5 1 150079.7 15 20.3 1 5
100 83 83.o 17 17.0 0 1100 83 83.o 17 17.0 0 1100 83 83.o 17 17.0 o“”” 1100 83 83.0 ““ 17 17.0 ““ o 1100 100 100.0 0 ““”0.0”” o 1
Question
Number
,17
18
1
Variable Name and LabelEligible to
Cases includedanswer
Missing cases Minimum Maximum
Total sample:100 N N “A N “ASOURCE What was the source of the innovation? 67 67 100.0 0 ““0.0 1“ 11MOTIVE1 What were the founde?s motives for setting up the firm? 100 90 m“.o 10 10.0 1“ 41MOTIVE2 What were the founder’s motives for setting up the firm? 100 28 %.0 72 72.0 2 36MOT1 Motives: desire for indenendencelto be own boss Ion 9!5 Q50 !5 56 1 =,~–MOT2 Motives:to make money
“MOT3 Motives: research possibilities and urge to innovate 100 95 95.0 5““MOT4 Motives: threatened or actual unemployment
5.0 1 5100 95–-–: 9% : 2 5.6 1 5
MOT5 Motives: identified new market opportunity 100 96 4 “4.0 1~OTHMOT Motives: other (please specify)
5“100 13 13.0 87 87.0 7
MOT6 Motives: other32
100 14 14.0 86 86.o 4 52 2.0 o 28-=’”=1ADVANT1 Main advantages of operating in Cambridge/Oxford? 100 98 98.0 2
!ADVANT2 Main advantages of Operating in Cambridge/Oxford? 100 46 46.0 54 540 1 30 1;VELO1 Devekmmentresearch links with Cam/Ox UniveDE :rsity.,.
DEVEL02 Oevelopmentresearch links with Cam/Ox firms
~DEVEL03 Developmentaccess to Innovative people, ideas, technologies
OEVEL04 Development:quality of local research staff
DEVEL05 Developmentavailabifity of local research staff
DEVEL06 Developmentavailability of local managerial staff
“bEVEL07 Developmen!attractive local living environment
DEVEL08 Development reputation & prestige of CamlOx address
100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1“100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1100 100 100.0 o“ 0.0 1100 100 100.0 0 0.0 ‘—” 1
D 0.0 1
!s
.0 0 0.0 1
.0 0 0.0 1100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1
DEVEL09 Developmentproximity to local customers 100 100—.-. ~ oOEVEL1 O Developmenlproximity to local suppliers, subcontractors 100 100DE”VEL11 Developmentaccess to local capital, finance 100 100 1o=DEVEL12 Development availability of appropriate premise>
DEVEL13 Development access ~ international airports
DEVEL14 Oevelopment:access to London 100 100 100.0 o 0.0 1 5DEVEL15 Development advantages of Science Park location 100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1 5DEVEL16 Developmenlaccess to local business services 100 100 100.0 o 0.0 1 5DEVEL17 Development: supportive local government services 100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1 4DEVEL18 Development supportive local training organisations 100 100 100.0 0 0,0” 1””4DEVEL19 Development local shareholders 100 86 86.0 14 14.0 ‘- 1 5DISADV1 Main disadvantages of operating in Cambridge/Oxford? 100 “-” 97 “-”” 97.0 3 3.0DIS”ADV2 Main disadvantages of operating in C>”mbridge/Oxford?”””
o 99100 30 SO:o 70 70.0 1 33
CONSTOI Constraints:lack of appropriate local premises 100 Too 100.0 0 0.0 1 %CONST02 Constraints:cost of local premises 100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1 5
5
5
T
5
5“
“i
5-
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
QuestionNumber
Variable Name and Label
CONST03 Constraints: shortage of Iota skilled”labour
Eligible toCases included
answerMssing cases M!nimum Maximum
Total sam!Ae: 100 N N % N v.
100 100 100.0 0 00CONST04 Constraints: shortage of local semi-sklled Iabour 100 100 100.0 0 0.0CONST05 Constraintsshortage of local secretarial Iabour 100 100 100.0 0 0.0CONST06 Constraints: shortage of local managerial skills 100 100 100.0 0 0.0CONST07 Constraintsshortage of local marketing & sales skills 100 100 100.0 0 0.0CONST08 Constraints:local planning controls 100 96 98.0 2 2.0CONST09 Constraintsstaff housing problems 100 100 100.0 0CONST1 O Constraints: staff transport problems 100 100 100.0 0CONST11 Constraintsinadequate business services
..——100 100 100.0 0
CONST12 Constraintslack of local subcontractors 100 100 100.0 0CONST13 Constraints:poor quality of local subcontractors 100 100 , 100.0 0CONST14 Constraints: absence of government grants 100 100 100.0 ‘ oCONST15 Constraints inadeauatelcostlv environment for manufactt,rina 4no 1ml <non n
1
1
1
1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
.- ._.. = .<-- –—_.. .. . . . . 0.0CONST16 Constraints: dficult acc-sss to local capital, finance
,. -.. - .100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1
OTHCON Constraintsother (please specify)
=-a
5100 5 5.0 95 95.0 1 3“
CONST17 Constraints other 100 3 3.0 97 97.0 5“TRANS Have you transferred functions to or from outside Cam/Ox?
3100 99 99.0 1 1.0 0
FUNC1 What were these fundlons?1
29 28 .-Y6 I___ 3.4 “oFUNC2 Wmat were these functions?
729 2 6.9 27 93.1 2
TRANS1 Where were these functions transferred to?4
29 28 96.6 1 3.4 1 2056.2 4 13.8 1 11
126
TRANS2 Where were these functions transferred from?
JOBS How many jobs were involved?
TRANS3 Why were they~ransferred?
TRANS4 Why were they transferred?
MERGE1 Have you acquiredlmerged with other firms in the last 5 yrs
REAS1 .YOur reasons for acquiringlmerging
REAS2 Your reasons for acquiringlmerging
REAS3 Their reasons for acqu[ringlmerging
REAS4 Their reasons for acquiringlmerging
ACCI Importance of their research capability in merger
ACC2 Importan= of their innovation in merger
SUBSID1 Importance of your desire for subsidiaV in merger
GROWTH1 How has Cam/Ox subsidiary grown sines takeover?
GROWI Why has it grown at a different rate?
GROW2 why has it grown at a different rate?
29 25
29
29 —.. :__“29
100 100
25 -24
25”6
25 23
25 3
25 “25
25 25
25 16
25 15
21 9
21 2
.
1
11“
1
1
1
111
a88.2 4 13.8 093.1 2 6.9 13.4 26 96.6 5“
100.0 0 0.0 096.0 1 4,0 224.0 19 76.0 292.0 2 6.0 1
22 88.0
o“ 0.0
0 0.0
9 36.0
10 40.0
12 57.1
19 90.5
12.0
100.0
100.0
64.0
60.0
42.9
$5
21“”
1“
1
11
2
5
5
5
5
-1
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5K
19
5
1-
21
20
20
16
5
5
3
3
11
9
NumberVariable Name and Label
Eligible 10Cases included
answerMissing cases Minimum Maximum
Total sample: 100 N N % N %MERGE2 Have you been acquired by another firm in the last 5 yrs? 100 “loo 100.0 0 0.0 0 1REA.35 Their reasons for acquiring/mergin9 9 8 88.9 1 11.1 6REAS6 Their reasons for acquiringlmerging
17
9 4 44.4 5“ 556 3REAS7 Your reasons for acquiringlmerging
18
9“9 100.0 o“ 0.0 1REAS8 Your reasons for acquiringlmerging
19
9 “1””” 11.1 8 88.9 17ACC3 Importance of your research capability in merger
17
9 8 88.9 1 11.1 1ACC4 Importance of your innovation in merger
5
9 8 88.9GROWTH2 How has Cam/Ox subsidia~ grown since takeover?
1 11.1 159 7 77.8
(2 22.2 -1’2
7 5 71.4 2’GROW4 Why has it grown at a different rate?
28.6 1 107 2 28.6 5 71.4 2
ATTIT Your attitude to possibility of being taken over5
100 98 _ 98.0 2 2.0 1ATT1 Reasons for your attitude to takeover
3100 94 94.0 6 6.0 0 46
5.0 85 85.0 3 421 98.0 2 2.0 0 100:iii
GROW3 Why has it grown at a different rate?
ATT2 Reasons for your attitude to takeover 100 15 15TALES Sales resulting from innovations (%) 100 98INNOV1 What are these innovations? 94 90 95.7 4 4.3 1INNOV2 What are these innovations?
.— —.94 33 35.1 ._ 61 64.9 ‘- 1
INNOV3 What are these innovations? W Q“Q6 “=1.— ;;
RK cm d 2
ORIG Rate the originality of these innovations ;6 ‘“” ;0 ;3;8 ;- ;-; ; ;COXI Cam/Ox sources: within firm 96 95 99.0 1COX2 Cam/Ox sourcas:within organisation
596 40
COX3 Cam/Ox sources: suppliers of stand. materials & components------ ;% ‘-”;”. .~6 .. . ~;... ; 5
96 90_COX~~imlOx sourcessuppliers~ stem. materials & components
496 90 93.8 6 6.3
=:1
1 “4”COX5 Cam/Ox sources: clients or customers 96 92 95.8 4 4.2 1 5SOX6 Cam/Ox sources:competitors 96 90 93.8 6 6.3COX7 CamfOx sources: consultancy firms 96 91 9..6 5 5.2COX8 Cam/Ox sourcas:Universityihigher education institutes 96 93 ..-..= ?.- 3 3.1OTHCOX Cam/Ox sourcss:other (piease specify) 96 6 6.3 90 93.8COX9 Cam/Ox sources: other 96 6 6.3 90 93.8RESTUK2 Rest UK sources: within organisation 96 45 46.9 51 53.1RESTUK3 Rest UK sources: suppliers of stand. materials & components 96 86 91.7 8 8.3RESTUK4 Rest UK sources: suppliers of custom. materials & components 96 89 92.7 7 7.3RESTUK5 Rest UK sources: clients or customers 96 94 97.9 2 2.1RESTUK6 Rest UK sources: competitors
—.96 69 “92.7 7 7.3
RESTUK7 Rest UK sources: consultancy firms 96 90 938- 6 6.3RESTUK8 Rest UK sources: University/higher education institutes 96 91 94.8 5 5.2
QuestionVariable Name and Label
Eligible toCases included
answerMissing cases Minimum MaximumNumber
Total sample: 100 N
OTHREST Rest UK sources: other fcdease soecifv) W3N %
5 5.2
5 5,2
47 49.0
“/0
94.8
94.8
51.0
9.4
8.3
3.1
4.2
7.3
5.2
94.8
94.8
2.1
1.0
1.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
3.1
71,9
1
1
48
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
13
~, ,. -.--,. . .RESTUK9 Rest UK sources: other 960UTUK2 Non UK sources: within organisatio 960UTUK3 Non UK sources: suppliers of stand, materials & components 96 87 90.60UTUK4 Non UK sources: suppliers of custom. materials & components 96 88 91.7
“OUTUK5 Non UK sources: clients or customers 96 93 96.90UTUK6 Non UK sources: competitora 96 92 ~ 95.8
“OUTUK7 Non UK sourcea:consultancy firms 96” 89’ 92.70UTUK6 Non UK sources: Universityihigher education institutes 96 91 94.8OTHOUT Non UK sourcesother (please specify) 98 5 5.20UTUK9 Non UK sources: other 96 5 5.2BAR1 Barriers to innovafion:lack of finance 96
.—.94 97.9
:BAR2 Barriers to innovafion:prohibtive costs 96 95 ! 99.0BAR3 Barriers to innovation: uncerfaintyllong pay-off period 96 95 ~ 99.0BAR4 Barriers to innovation:lack of skilled personnel 96 94 97.9BAR5 Barriers to innovation: resistance to change within firm_... 96 94 97.9BAR6 Barriers to innovation: innovation too easy to copy 96 94 97.9BAR7 Barriers to innovation:lack of customer responsiveness 96 93 96.9OTHBAR Barriers to innovation: other (please specify) 96 27 28.7BAR8 Barriers to innovation: other 96 14 14.6OVER Has being in CamJOx helped you to overcome barriers? 96 96OVCMI How has it helped you? 17 77
“OVCM2 How has it helped you? 17 6LINKS1 Research hnks with Univ dept or Govi-funded research estab? 100 100UNILINKS Local links with I Universities 7 Inn ~n”
RESLINI Which Univ
85.4 4
0 0.0 0
0 0.0 1
11 64.7”2”
0 0.0 0 I100.0
100.0
“35.3
100.0,“q,o o 0.0 o–
8 10.0 1
30 37.5 0
dept or Govt-funded research eatab?
RESLIN2 Which Univ dept or Govt-funded research estab
FORMALl Are these links formal Or informal?
LINOI Cam/Ox links involve: academics on the Board
LIN02 Cam/Ox links involve: collab with Univ depts or academics
LIN03 Cam/Ox inks involve: collab with Govl research estab
LIN04 Cam/Ox links involve: part-time academics in company
LIN05 Cam/Ox links involve: research consortia or clubs
LIN06 Cam/Ox links involve: university staff as consultants
LIN07 Cam/Ox links involve: patenting of University inventions
-v
“80,“” ,“.
72 90..0
62.5
10
12b7 80 50
80
65
65
65
65
65
65
60
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
100.0 0
100.0 0
100:0 0
100.0 0
100.0 0
100.0 0
0.0 1
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 o“
0,0 o
3
1
1
1
1
T11
0.0 0
0.0 0
0.0 o
100.0”” 0
100.0 065
Question
Number
E5
E6
E7
E8
E9
Elo
El 1
Variable Name and Label Eligible toCases included
answerMissing cases Minimum Maximum
Total sample: 100 N N -... “~ ; %LIN08 CamlOx links involve: university training programmed 65 65 100.0 0.0 0 1OTHLINO Cam/_Ox hnks involye:other (pl~aSe SPeCify) 65 10 15.4 55 84.6 1 10
LIN09 Cam/Ox links involvwother 65 65 100.0 o“ 0.0 0 1LIN11 Other links involve: academics on the Board 65 65 100.0 0 0.0 0 1LIN12 Other links involve: collab with Univ depts or academics 65 65 100.0 o“ 0.0 o iLIN13 Other links involve: collab with Govl research estab 65 65 100.0 0 “0.0 “ o 1LIN 14 Other links invoive:pati-time academics in company 65 65 100.0 0 0.0 0 1“”
,LIN15 Other hnks involve: research consortia or clubs 65 65 100.0 0 0.0 o““LIN16 Other links involve: university staff as consultants
165 65 100.0 0 “0.0 ““”—- o 1“
LIN17 Other links involve: patenting of University inventions 65 65 100.0 0 0.0 0 1LIN18 Other hnks involve: university training programmed 65 65 100.0 0 0.0 0 i
~OTHLIN1 Other links~nvolve:other (please specify) 65 8 12.3 57 87.7 2 9LINI 9 Other links involve: other
—. ——. ..—.65 65 100.0 0 0.0 0 1-
INFLIN1 What are these informal links? 62 _62 100.0 o—.—.—. .—. —. 0.0 1 22INFLIN2 What are these informal links? 62 25 40.3 37 59.7
‘BENEFIT”l Mat are the benefits for you?2 21
80 75 93.8 5 6.3%ENEFIT2 What are the benefits for YOU?
o 31
80 37 46.3 ~ 43 53.6 1 33COMP How important are benefita to firm’s competitive success? 80 77 96.3 3 3.6 1 5“-PROBLEM Any problems using these links? 60 76 95.0 4 5.0 0 1IPR Were there problems of Intellectual Property Rights? 27 22 81.5 ““5 18.5 OPROB1 If NO, whatwere the problems?
117 8 47.1 9 52.9 1 6
PROB2 If NO, what were the problems? 17 0 0.0 17 100.0HEARDI Heard of CU Ind Liason & Tech Trans Ofice 42 42 100.0 0 0.0 0“”1HEARD2 Heard of CU Programme for Industry 42 42 100.0 0 0.0HEARD3 Heard of CU Local lndust~ Link
o 142 42 - ““”100.0 0 0.0 0 1
HEARD4 Heard otOxford Industrial Liason Ofice 38 : 33 86.8 5 13.2 0 1HEARD5 Heard oflSIS Innovation 38 33 86.8 5 13.2 0 1CONTACT1 Had contactCU Ind Liaaon & Tech Trans Office 22 18 81.8 4 18.2
“CONTACT2 Had contacCCU Programme for Industryo 1
13 18 94.7 1 5.3 0 1CONTACT3 Had contact:CU Local Industry tink 20 19 95.0 1 5.0 0 iCONTACT4 Had contact: Oxford Industrial Liason Office 25 18 72.o 7 28.0 0 1CONTACT5 Had contactlSIS Innovation 32 19 59.4 13 40.6 0 1USE1 Usefulness:CU Ind Liason & Tech Trans Office 12 7 58.3 5 41.7 1 4USE2 Usefulness:CU Programme for Industry 6 6 ““” 75.0 2 25.0 1 2USE3 Usefulness:CU Local Industry Link 13 11 84.6 2 15,4 1 3
QuestionNumber Variable Name and Label
Eligible toCases included
answerMissing cases Minimum Maximum
:12
:13
:14
[15
:16
:17
18
1
2
3
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Total sample:l 00 N N % N “/0USE4 Usefulness: Oxford Industrial Liason Off!ce 21 12 57.1 9 42.9
::::4
5USE5 Usefulness:lSIS innovation
127 10 37.0 17 63.0
CONT1 If contact was made, what was it?1“5
47 29 61.7 38.3 OCONT2 If contact was made, what was ~?
18 1347-”4” 8.5 43 91.5 2
OPSITE Have you operated on any University or College site?11
100 99 99.0 1 1.0SITE1 Which site?
0“1
1 5.0 : 1 6“SITE2 Which site? 17 85.0 “;– 2HELP1 How helpful: flexibility of leasing premises
2
2 10.0 : 1HELP2 How helpful:cost of premises
5
HELP3 How helpful: car parking availability2 10.0 1 5
2 10.0HELP4 How helpful: consultancy advice
1 5
2 10.0 1“5HELP5 How helpful: image and conferred credibility 2’ 10.0 “’ 1 5“HELP6 How helpful: availability of shared facilities 2 !“ 10.0 1 “-5
2’ 10.0 1 4
-3 15.0 1“520
19
3
18
18
18—.18
18 ‘“
18
17
95.0
15.0
90.0
90.0
90.0
90.0
90.0
90.0
90.0
85.0
HELP7 How help ful:opportunities to network with other firms 20 18“‘ HELP8 How helpful:base to formhjiploit links with the University
DISITE Any disadvantages to operating on that site? 20 ““18DISADV3 What were these disadvantages?
90.0 2 10.0 o 114 12 85.7 2“
DISADV4 What were these disadvantages?14.3 1 10
1A c. ‘4.7 0 c“, . ~~~~ 3 . .—=---WHYMOVI If your firm is no longer on the site, why did it move?
.- . .,.,. , . -.. IL7 5 71.4 2 28.6 1 5
WHYMOV2 If your firm is no longer on the site, why did it move? 7 1“LINKS2 Close links within the Cambridge/Oxford region?
14.3 6 85.7 2“ 2100 100 100.0 0 0.0 o 1
REGLIN 1 What are these links? 61 60 98.4 ~ 1 1.6
=A
20REGLIN2 What are these hnks?
o61 :“ 20 32.8 “41 67.2 2“
LOCALl How important are local hnks with customers?19
100 74 74.0 26 26.0 1 5LOCAL2 How important are Iocsl links with supplierslsubcontractors? 100 75 75.0LOCAL3 How important are local links with sewice tirms? 100 76 76.0LOCAL4 How important are local hnks with research collaborators?
.——.100 74 74.0
LOCAL5 How important are local links with similar firms? 100 74 74.0OTHLOC Other Iota links (please specify) 100 ‘“– 1 1.0LOCAL6 How important are other local links? 100 1 1.0PROX1 How important is proximity of Iota customers? 100 68 68.0PROX2 How important is proximity of local supplierslsubcontractors 100 72 72.0PROX3 How important is proximity of local sewice tirms? 100 73 73.0PROX4 How important is proximity of local research collaborators? 100 70 70.0PROX5 How important is proximity of local similar firms? 100 70 70.0
25 25.0 1 5
24 24.0 1“5
26 26.0 1 5
26 26.0 - 1 ““=~-1 5
99 99.0 1 i
99 99.0 5 5
32 32.o 1
==1
5“
26 - 28.0 1 5
27 27.0 1“ 5
30 30.0 1 5
30 30.0 1 5 ,
Question
Number
‘4
5
6
7“
Variable Name and Label Eligible toCases included
answerMissing cases Minimum Maximum
Total sample:100 N N % NPROX6 How important is proximity of other local links?
“/,100 1 1.0 “99 99.0 5
OUTREG1 How important are links with customers outside Cam/Ox?5
100 99 99:0 1 1.00UTREG2 How important are links with suppl/subcont outside Ca”m/Ox?
1 5100 99 99.0 1“ 1.5 1“5
OUTREG3 How important are links with service firms outside Cam/Ox? 100 98 98.0 2 1“5OUTREG4 How important are links with research collab outside Cam/Ox?
2.0100 98
OUTREG5 How important are finks with similar firms outside CamfOx?98.0 2 2.0 1 5
100 99 99.0”” 1 ~OTHREG Otherlinks outside Cam/Ox (please spec[fy)
1.0 1 5-100 2 2.0 98 1:2
0UTREG6 How important are other hnks outside Cam/Ox?98.0
100 2 2.0 98.0 ”3”5INREG1 More useful if links with customers inside Cam/Ox?
98
—. 100 “97 97.0INREG2 More useful ~ links with suppl/subcont inside Cam/Ox?
3 3.0 0 1100 97
INREG3 More useful if links with service firms inside Cam/Ox?97.0 3 3.0 - 0 1
I!L. _____ _97 97.0 3INREG4 More useful if links with research wllab inside CamIOx?
3.0 0 1100 .__97 97.0 ‘“ 3
INREG5 More useful if links with similar firms inside CamfOx~3.0 0 1-
100 97.0 3INREG6 More useful if other links inside Cam/Ox?
3.0 0 1100..-. ----- j ..-: ::+ ;._ 3.0 o
GEOLIN 1 For what links is geographical proximity not important?1
100GEOLIN2 For what links is geographical proximity not important?
8.0 0 17100 9 9.0 91
BEN I Benefits of Iinks:amount of info on prods& procs91.0 3 11
100 87BEN2 Benefits of Iinksquality of info on prods & procs
87.0 13 13.0 1 5100 87 87.0 13 1“
BEN3 Benefits of Iinks:improving accass to research findings13.0 5
100 87 87.0BEN4 Benefits of hnks:assuring quality of supplies
13 13.0 1 5“”100 87 87,0 13 13.0 1
BEN5 Benefits of Iinksassuring delivery of supplies5
100 88 88.0 12 12.0 1 ““ 5BEN6 Benefits of Iinksresponsiveness to market requirements 100 91 91.0
..—
=7 Benefits of Iinks:more effe~vefmnovative R & D9 9.0 1 5
100 89 89.0” ““ 11~OTHBEN Other benefits (please specify)
11.0 1 5100 “ 5 5.0 95
BEN8 Benefits of Iinksother95.0 1 5
100 4 4.0 96EAS1 Benefits easier in Cam/Ox: amount of info on prods& procs
96.0 3 5100 86 86.0 14
EAS2 Benefits easier in CamlOx:quality of info on prods& procs14.0 0 1
100 86 86.0 14 14.0 o 1~S3 Benefits easier in Cam/Oximprov access to research findings 100 66 86.0 14 14.0 oEAS4 Benefits easier in Cam/Ox: assuring quality of supplies
1100 86 660 14 14.0 o
EAS5 Benefits easier in Cam/Ox: assuring delivery of supplies1
100 86 86.0 14EAS6 Benefits easier in Cam/Oxresponsiveness to market reqs
14.0 0 1“loo 86 14
EAS7 Benefits easier in Cam/Ox:more effective fmnovative R & D86.0 14.0 0 1
100 86 86.o 14 ‘“ 14,0EAS8 Benefits easier in Cam/Ox: other
o 1100 86 86.0 14
RISK1 Risk of Iinks:ioss of property rights in prods & procs14.0 0 1
100 87”” 67.0 13 ““””” 13.0RISK2 Risk of Iinks:loss of control of confidential info
1 5“loo 66 880 12 12.0 1“””<
Question
Number
F9
F1o
Fll
F12
F13
F14
F15
F16
Fl~
F 18
F 19 “-
F20
Variable Name and LabelEligible to
Cases includedanswer
Missing cases Minimum Maximum
Total sample: 100 N N % NRISK3 Risk of Iinks:dependence on specific firms
“/0100 90 90.0 10
OTHRISK Other risks (please specify)10.0 1 5
100 4 4.0 96 1-4RISK4 Risk of Iinks: other
96.0100 3 3.0 97 97.0 2
REDUC1 Loca risk reduced:loss of propetiy tights in prods& pr6ck5
94” 70 24“REDUC2 Local risk reduced:loss of control of confidential info
74.5 25.5 O“i7fi ~ _~4
REDUC3 Local risk reduced: dependence on specific firms1
=DUC4 Local risk reduced: other.._- : _... ;.. ._: ;=_.: ~.. ~ :____;74.5 1
94HOWRED1 How else may risks be reduced:legally binding contracts
198 82 83.7 16
HOWRED2 How else may risks be reduced: stricf observance of contracts16.3 1 5
98 62 83.7 16HOWRED3 How else may risks be reduced: personal relationships
16.3 1 598 83 “64:7 15
HOWRED4 How else may risks be reduced:fair trading15.3 1 5
. 98” ’83 84.7 ‘“” 15HOWRED5 How else may risks be reduced: business relationships
15.3 1 598 ‘— 83 84.7 15
10THRED HOWelse may risks be reduced: other (please specify)15.3 1 5
—. .— 98 7 7.1 .__91 92.9 11HOWRED6 How else may risks be reduced: other
698 6“ 6.1 92 93.9 -“ 4
OW74 Have people who left your firm formed their own company?5
100 100” 100.0 0COXREG Are they in the Cambridge/Oxford region?
0.0 0146 46 100.0 0
FIRMI Whatisthebusineas?0.0 0 1
42 42 100.0 oFIRM2 What isthe business?
0.0 0 1742 5 11.9 37
FORMAL2 Anyccmfinuing links with these people?88.1 3 18
42 42 100.0 0 o“EMPLIN1 Whatarethese links?
0.0 331 26 83.9 5 16.1
EMPLIN2 Whatarethese links?1 13
31 12 38.7 19RECRUIT Doyourecruit tech/scienfific staff from Cation?
61.3 1 12100 100 100.0 o “o
ADVANT3 Advantages ofrecruiting tech/scientific staff from Cam/Ox?0.0 1
60 57 95.0 3ADVANT4 Advantages ofrecruifing tech/scientific staff from Cam/Ox?
5.0 0 1560 25 41.7 35 58.3 1 16
PEOPLE Dolinks exist because ofpeople who have moved? 100 98 98.0 2VALUEI Howvaluable aresuch links?
2.0 0 154 47 “87.0 7 13.0 1
OFT1 Howoften doyoumix with people from:loal companies?5
100 100 100.0 0OFT2 Howoften doyoumix with people from: Cam/Ox Univdepts?
0.0 1 3100 100 100.0 0 0.0 1
OFT3 Howoffen doyoumix with people from: Gotiresearch labs?3
100 ““” 100 100.0 0 0.0CAMO1 Help from: Carobs TECH
1 350 50 100.0 o“ 0“1
CAM02 Help from: Cambridgshire UNIT0.0
50 50 100.0 oCAM03 Help from: Districf or City Councils
0.0 0 150 50 100.0 o“
CAM04 Help from: Cambridge Chamber of Commerce0.0 0 1
50 50 100.0 o“CAM05 Help from:CambridgeE nterpriseAgency
0.0 0 1“50 50 100,0 6
CAM06 Help from: Fen BET0.0 0 1
50 50 100.0 o“ 0.0 o 1
Question
NumberVariable Name and Label Eligible to
Cases includedanswer
Mksing cases M!nimum Maximum
Total sample: 100 N N % N %CAM07 Help from:DTl (Enterprise Initiative) 50 50 100.0 o 0.0OTHCAM Help from: other (please specify)
o 150 12 “24.0 38 76.0 1
CAM08 Help from: other5
50 50 100.0 o 0.0 0 1OXO1 Help fmm:Oxford Trust 50 47 94.0 3 6.0 0“10X02 Help from: Districf or C!ty Councils 50 47 940 3“ 6.0 ““OOX03 Help from: Heart of Engl Training & Enterprise Council
150” 47; 94.0 3 6.0 O
0X04 Help from: Oxford & District Chamber of Commerce1.—.
50 47 94.0 3“ 6.0 00X05 Help from: Research & Science-based Industry Group
150 47 940 3 6.0 0“”1
‘0X06 Help from: Oxford College-Small Business Centre 50 47 94.0 3 0“1~OX07 Help frorn:NORBIS
6.0
50 47 94.0 3 6.0 0 0
E ~~~~rise~gen~~. ____ ~_.. . ... . ~~~ ._ 3... :..~~.. ~ ___ f~-$=.~
50 47
OTHOX Help from:other (please specify)
OX1 O Help from: other 50 49 98.0~ALUE2 How useful was this advice?
1 2.0 0 181 71 87.7 10 12.3 1
GROWTH3 How do you want your firm to grow?5
100 100 100.0 o~LARGO1 Adv of being Iargerincreased access to resources
0.0 1 383 81 97.6 2 2.4 1 5
~tiRG02 Adv of being larger.abMy to gst economies of scale 83 62=G03 Adv of being Iargerimproved bargaining position
98.8 1 1.2 1 583 81 97.6 2 2.4 1 5
LARG04 Adv of being Iargerability to diversify 83 82 98.8 1 1.2 1–5LARG05 Adv of being Iargerless reliant on outside firms——. 83 61 97.6 2“ 2.4 1LARG06 Adv of being Iargerincreased capitalisation
583 82 98.8 1 1.2 1
LARG07 Adv of being Iargerincreased market presence5
83 63 75.9 20‘OTHLG1 Advantage of beinglargero(her (please specifi)
24.1 1 583 18 21.7 65 78.3 2 15
-~RG08 Advantage of being Iargerother 83 17 20.5 66 79.5 3LARGI 1 Disadv of being Iargerincreased inflexibility
583 82 98.8 1 1.2” 1
LARG12 Disadv of being Iargerloss of morale within firm5
83 82 98.8 1 1.2 1LARG13 Disadv of being Iargerreduction of directors control
583 82 98.8 1 1.2
LARG14 Oisadv of being Iargerincreased depend on out funds1 5
83” 81” 97.6 2 2.4 1OTHLG2 Disadvantage of being Iargerother (please specify)
583 13” 15.7 70 84.3 2 12
LARG15 Disadvantage of being Iargerother 83 13 15.7 70 84.3 2GAIN1 Gain/avoid (dis)advantages with local links?
583 82 98.8 1 1.2 0
GNO1 IF NO, why not?1
43 31 72.1“GN02 IF NO, why not?
12 ““ 27.9 “O 1443 0 T“.o 43 100.0
GN03 IF YES, how? 41 35 85.4 6 14.6 1 29
Question
NumberVariable Name and Label
Eligible toCases included
answerMissing cases Minimum Maximum
Total sample:100 N N “/. N “/.
GN04 IF YES, how? 41 17 41.5 24 58.5 4 30;6 SMAL11 Adv of being smaller: increased flexibility 2 2 100.0 0 0.0 1 3
SMAL12 Adv of being smaller increase of morale within firm z 2 100,0 0 0.0 3 5
SMAL13 Adv of being smaller increase of directors control 2 2 100.0 0 0.0 1 3
SMAL14 Adv of being smallerreduced depend on out funds z ‘“ 2 100.0 o“ (j~ ~ “-~””
~OTHSM2 Advantage of being smaller other (please specify)
1
2 1 50.0 1“ 50.0 - 1 1SMAL15 Advantage of being smallerother 2 1 50.0 1 50.0 5
i7
5
SMALO1 Disadv of being smalle~reduced acceas to resources 2 2 100.0 0 0.0 1 1
SMAL02 Disadv of being smallecinabifity to get economies of scale 2 2 100.0 ‘“ o 0.0 1 2
SMAL03 Dlsadv of being smallersubordinate bargaining position 2 2 100.0 o“ 0.0 3 5SMAL04 Disadv of being smalleninability to diversify 2 2 100.0 0 0.0 1 4–
SMAL05 Disadv of being smallermore reliant on outside firms 2“ 2 100.0 0 0.0 1 “-5””
“i3MAL06 Disadv of being Smallerreduced capitaliaafion 2 2 100.0 o 0.0 1 1
SMAL07 Disadv of being smaller reduced market presence 2 0 0.0 2 100.0
OTHSM1 Disadvantage of being arnallerother (please specify) 2 1 50.0 1 50.0 1 l—
SMAL08 Disadvantage of being smallerother 21 50.0 “ 1 50.0 3“
GAIN2 Gain/avoid (disadvantages w~h local links?
3
i9 2’2 100.0 o“ 0.0 0
GN05 IF NO, why not~”
1
1 0 0.0 1 100.0
‘GN06 lF”NO~why not? 1 0 0.0 1—
100.0
‘GN07 IF YES, how? 1 1 100.0 0 0.0
GN08 IF YES, hoi?
11 11
“1 o 0.0 1 100.0
10 SAMEO1 Adv of being the sameflexibility..—
15 14 93.3 ““ 1 6.7
SAME02 Adv of being the same:mora~ within firm
1 5
15 14 93.3 1_ 6.7 1 5
SAME03 Adv of being the same:directors control 15 7 14 93.3 1 6.7 1 5
SAME04 Adv of being the same: independence from outside funds 15 14 93.3 1“ 6.7 1 5
SAME05 Adv of being the samsaccess to resources,.. —.
15 14 93.3 1 6,7 1 5“”
SAME06 Adv of being the same: economies of scale 15 14 93.3 1 6,7 1 5
SAME07 Adv of being the same: bargaining position 15 14 93.3 1 6.7 1 5
SAME08 Adv of being the sameabilify to diversify 15 14 93.3 1 6.7 r 5
SAME09 Adv of being the same: independence from other firms 15 14 93.3 1 8.7 1 5
OTHSA1 Adv of being the same: other (please specify) 15 2 13.3 13 86.7 1’1
SAME1O Adv of being the samsother 15 2 13.3 13 86.7
“1
3 5
11 SAME11 Disadv of being the same:flexitilify 15 14 93.3 1 6,7 1 2
SAME I 2 Disadv of being the same: morale within firm 15 14 93.3 1 6.7 1 3
SAME13 Disadv of being the same: directors control 15 ““’ 14 93.3 1 6.7 1 1
Question
Number
;13
123
4“
5
6“
7
Variable Name and Label Eligible toCases included
answerMissing cases Minimum Maximum
Total sample:100 N N % N %SAME14 Oisadv of being the same: independence from outside funds 15 “14 93.3” 1 6.7” 1””3SAME15 Disadv of being the same: access to resources 15 14 93.3 1 6.7 1-5SAME16 Disadv of being the same: economies of scale 15 15 100.0 0 0:0” 1””4SAME17 Oisadv of being the same: bargaining position 15 15 100.0 0 0.0SAME18 i3sadv of being the same: ability to diversify
1 415 14 93.3
SAME19 Oisadv of being the same: independence from other firms5
15 14 93.3OTHSAZ O@dv of being the sameother (please specify)
—.—.. ;—:. ::;_____ ; 315 1 “6.7 14 93.3
SAME20 Disadv of being the same: other1
15”1” 6.7 14 93.3 3 3“GAIN3 Gain/avoid (disadvantages with local finks? 15 15 100.0 0 “0.0GN09 IF NO, why not?
0’13 2 66.7” 1“ 33.3
GN1O IF NO, why not?3:–4
3,0.— ..—
0.0 100.0GN11 IF YES, how?
312 : 11 91.7” 1“
GN12 IF YES, how?8.3 2 27
12 5 ‘- 41.7 7; 58;3..—
INTERNAT Internationalisation indicator220
100 93 93:0 7 7.0 “—-– 3INDEP Is your firm independent?
o100 ‘“ 93 ~ 93.0 “7 -7.0
YEAR Year your firm began tradingo 1
100 93 93.0 7“: 7.0 ‘OPREG Year your firm began operations in the CamlOx region
1820 1995100 92 92.0 8 _] 8~.. 1820 __._l~...
UK If a subsidiary, is the parent company UK or foreign? 100 17 17.0 83 83.0TURN95 Your turnover in 1995 (fth)
1100” ”88” 88.0 12.0 O - 180000
EXP95 Your expofis in 1995 (fth)12
““100 80 80.0 20 20.0 105000EMPL95 Your employment in 1995
0100 89 89.0 11 ‘“”11.0 1
SITES95 Number of sites in 1995 (incl HQ)6250
100 ‘“”- 88 88.0TURN90” Your turnover in 1990 (fth)
12 12.0 1 3062 69 64.1 13 15.9 o
EXP90 Your exports in 1990 (fth)703000
82 63 76.8 19 ‘23.2EMPL90 Your employment in 1990
0 6700062 67 81.7
SITES90 Number of sites in 1990 (incl HQ)15 18.3 1“ 1200
82 67 81.7 15 18.3WHERE1 If additional sites, where are they?
1 1539
~.28 71.8 11 28.2 1
WHAT1 If additional sites, what do they do?8
39 25 641 14”- 359WHERE2 If additional sites, where are they?
-98 1039 17 43.6 22 56.4
WHAT2 If additional sites, what do they do?2 10
39 15”” 38.5 24 61.5S95PC1 Percent of sales in 95 to: CambridgelOxford region
2 1297 83 85.6 14 14.4 0
S95PC2 Percent of sales in 95 to:rest of E Anglia/Oxen & SE Engl80
97 83 85.6 14 14.4 oS95PC3 Percent of sales in 95 tcxrest of UK
7597 83 85.6 14 14.4
S95PC4 Percent of sales in 95 to:rest of Europeo 98
97 63 85.6 14 14.4S95PC5 Percent of sales in 95 to:rest of World
o 11597 83 85.6 14 14.4 0 “-”187”
Question
NumberVariable Name and Label
Eligible toCases included
answerMissing cases Minimum Maximum
Pll
P12
P13
Total sample: 100 N N % N %PART4 Part-time employ ees:technicians & lower prof 100 88 88.0 12 12.0 oPART5 Part-time employees: technologists & higher prof
35
100 88 88.0 12 12.0 o 60PART6 Part-time employees: managerial 100 88 88.0 -17 17n ““ n RnTOTP Part-time employees: total~
100 90 90.0 1; “-”- ; ‘-10.0 2505TAFFI Research staff with degrees % 81 86.2 13 13.8 “OSTAFF2 Managerial staff with degrees % :...:” ._. ..!4 86.6 13STAFF3 Oirectors with degrees %
13.4 086 86.9 ~ 13 13.1
STAFF4 Research staff with Cambridge/Oxford degrees ‘..o
STAFF5 Managerial staff with Cambridm+/Oxfmrl dem+. ./.
?ES6 Where last 3 research staff come from: overseas Univ 95 “““ 67 7(RES7 Where last 3 research staff come from: overseas firms/ergs
“MAN1 Where iast 3 management staff come from: Cam/Ox Univ
MAN2 Where last 3 management staff come frOm:CamlOx region fir
dAN3 Where last 3 management staff come fmmcarninx rmlinn 0,
100100
% “G 80 65.1 14 14.9 o“
.-. -.-=. .. =,___ . 97 82 84.5 15 15.5STAFF6 Directors with Cambridge/Oxford degrees %
o99 85 85,9 14 14.1
RES1 Where last 3 research staff come from: Cam/Ox Univo
95 67 70.5 28 29.5RES2 Where last 3 research staff come from: Cam/Ox region firms
o95”” 67 70.5 28 29.5 0
RES3 Where last 3 research staff come from: Cam/Ox region ergs 95-67”” 70.5 28 ~ 29.5 ‘ ORES4 Where last 3 research staff mme from: other UK Univ
195— “67. — _
——_—. __70.5 28 “29.5
RES5 Where last 3 research staff come from: other UK firms/ergso 1
R“”95 ;“67 70.5 28 29.5 O 1
).5 28 29.5 0“”195 67 70.5 “28 29.5 0 197 57 58.8 40 41.2 0“1
irms 97x
57 58.6 40 41.2 0 1.,...:=-_ . .... . . .->... ,rgs——.. . .. . 97 57 58.6 40 41.2 O
MAN4 Where last 3 management staff come from: other UK Univ1
58.8 40 41.2MAN5 Where last 3 management staff come from: other UK firms/ergs
o 1
.--...: .-; _58.8 40 41.2 O 1“MAN6 Where last 3 management staff come from: overseas Univ 56.8 40 41.2MAN7 Where last 3 management staff come from: overseas tirmslorgs
o
;- ;. ..-.—
158.8 40 41.2
AREAO1 External firms: accountancyo 1
89.0 “’ 11 11.0AREA02 External firms: banking
o 1100
A“89 89.o 11 11.0 0 1
100
100
100
100
1“
1—.
\REA03 External firms: venture capital 100 89 89.0 11 11.0AREA04 External firms:legal services
o 1100 89 89.o 11 11,0 1“
AREA05 External firms: management consultantso
100 89 89.0 11 11.0AREA06 External tirms:public relations
o 1100 89 89.0 11 11.0
AREA07 External tirms:personnel & recruitmento 1
100 89 89.0 11 11.0 oAREA08 External firms: advetising
1100 89 89.0 11 11.0
AREA09 External firms: market researcho 1
100 89 89.o 11 fl.o o“”” 1AREAl O External firms: marketing 100 89 89.0 “11 11.0 1“AREAl 1 External firms: computer services
o100 89 89.0 11 11.0 o 1
Question
NumberVariable Name and Label Eligible to
Cases includedanswer
Missing cases Minimum Maximum
Total sample:100 N N “4 NAREAl 2 External firms: designlprinting services
%100 89 89.0 11 11.0 0“1
OTHAREA External ftrms:other (pleaSe specify) 100 9“ 9:0 91AREAl 3 External flrms:other
91.0 1 7100 89 89.0 11 “11.0 0“1
LOCO1 Local/non-local firms: accountancy 86 65 75.6 21LOC02 Local/non-local firms banking
24.4 0 10085 65””
~LOC03 Local/non-local tinms:venture capital76.5 20 23.5 O–.— 100
26 13 50.0 13LOC04 Local/non-local ?irms:legal services
50.0 0 10080 56 70.0 24
LOC05 Local/non-local firms: management consultants30.0 0 100
28 15 53.6 13 46.4 O ‘— 100~LOC06 Local/non-local firms: public relations 31 17 54.8 14LOCO? Local/non-local fmms:oersmmel & recntitment
45,2 0 100”&n “’7 7?” .C n7- . . . . .~., ., ..— . . . . .
LOC08 Locallnon-local firms: advertising
!LOC09 LocxaWnon-local firms: market research..—. ..— —— —. _LOCI O Local/non-local firms: marketing
,LOC11 Local/non-local tirms:computer services
~LOC12 Local/non-local iirmsdesignlprinting services
LOC13 Loca[lnon-local firms: other
QUALO1 Quality of local firms: acmuntancv
u. -.,Z ,<. -) .Z, .O
56 36 643 ; 35.7 :23 10 “- 43.5 13 56.5 023 10 43.5 13 56.5 044 29 65.9 15 “54.1 o80 ““59 73.8 21 26.3 O21 8 38.1 13- 61.9 ~_73 54 74.0 19 26.0 — 170 53 ‘ 75.7 17 24.3 1
1W1001001001001001005<“
..—.:QUAL02 Quali~o flocalf irms:bankin~”
QUAL03 Quality oflocal firms: venture cspital 22”9 40.9 13QUAL04 Quality oflocal firmslegal services
59.1 7“5
IQUAL05 Quality oflocal firms: management ansultants
,. “, ,,. ” L“ Lo.<lR K 970 4. =Oa
QUALC6 QualiWof loalfims:nublic relafinnsA–,
~=:. . . . . . . . . . . .
QUAL07 Quality oflocal firmspersonnel &recwitment
~QUI _Quality of local tirms:advertising
QUAL09 Quality oflocal firms: market research”
QUAL1O Quality oflocal finns:marketing
QUAL1l Quality OflOcal lirms:wmDuter sewices
QUAL12 Quali~oflocal firrns:design/printing sen /ices
QUAL13 Quality oflocalfirms:other
71 C4 7,,2.n
IV
20
50
38
15
19
33
71
17
.6
34
21
2
6
17
52
4
,C, .L, ,0
30.0 1468.0 ‘- 16
55.3 17 ““13.3 13
31.6 13
51.5 16
73.2 19
23,5 13
(z. <
70.032.044.786.768.448.526.8
76.5