survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ us races

19
Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races By Dan Nolan and Evans Starzinger January 27, 2012 Draft 1

Upload: tova

Post on 02-Feb-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races. By Dan Nolan and Evans Starzinger January 27, 2012. Draft 1. Summary:. Safety regulations are fragmented among a handful of regional constituents and become complex - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

By Dan Nolan and Evans StarzingerJanuary 27, 2012

Draft 1

Page 2: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Summary:

• Safety regulations are fragmented among a handful of regional constituents and become complex

• Safety regulations focus primarily on ‘minimum equipment requirements’, which are NOT core factors in recent safety incidents

• Opportunity = unify and simplify SRs to make them easier for sailors while refocusing on core safety issues

Page 3: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

SR’s used by offshore & coastal racesUS Sailing has 57% share

Page 4: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

SR’s used by buoy racesUS Sailing has 13% share

Anecdotal Prime reason for “ISAF but Not US Sailing Prescriptions” is requirement for PDF when starting/finishing

Sample size: 17 major ‘named’ races

Page 5: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Wide Range of SR complexityMonohull Cat 1/2

Word count of SR

Page 6: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Modification of SRs, among those using ISAF OSRsFew Races use OSR’s ‘as is’, but most with limited modifications

Number of Races

Num

ber of SRs Modified in

NO

R

Newport to Bermuda Race

Page 7: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Summary:

• Safety regulations are fragmented among a handful of regional constituents and become complex

• Safety regulations focus primarily on ‘minimum equipment requirements’, which are NOT core factors in recent safety incidents

• Opportunity = unify and simplify SRs to make them easier for sailors while refocusing on core safety issues

Page 8: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Actual Safety incidents not related to equipment requirements

US Offshore incidents over the past decade

• 2013 Island’s race, two broken rudders, one boat lost & one Fatality• 2012 Ensenada race, navigation and watch keeping errors, 4 deaths (minimal local SR’s)• 2012 Farallon’s race, seamanship judgment and race course layout, 5 deaths (ISAF SR’s with

local modifications)• 2012 Clipper race, weather routing & heavy weather tactics, 2 serious injuries (MCA/SOLAS

commercial SRs)• 2012 Bermuda return, broken rudder, boat abandoned• 2012 Bermuda return, severe injury, crew helo evaced• 2011 Chicago Mackinac, wind induced Capsize, 2 deaths (Mac SRs)• 2011 Annapolis to Newport, severe grounding at 12kts (ISAF SRs)• 2008 Galveston, TX Regatta de Amigos, keel broke off 1 death (ISAF SRs)• 2002 Block Island Race, unconscious MOB, 1 dead (ISAF SRs)• 2002 Newport to Bermuda, rig and prop strut failed in large waves – Andrew 70 (ISAF SRs)

Page 9: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Back-up:Longer list of incidents

2013 Island’s race, two broken rudders, one boat lost & one Fatality2012 Ensenada race, navigation and watch keeping errors, 4 deaths (minimal local SR’s)2012 Farallon’s race, seamanship judgment and race course layout, 5 deaths (ISAF SR’s with local modifications)2012 Clipper race, weather routing & heavy weather tactics, 2 serious injuries (MCA/SOLAS commercial SRs)2012 Bermuda return, broken rudder, boat abandoned2012 Bermuda return, severe injury, crew helo evaced2011 Fastnet, keel broke off, boat lost all crew safe (Rambler 100)2011 Chicago Mackinac, wind induced Capsize, 2 deaths (Mac SRs)2011 Annapolis to Newport, severe grounding at 12kts (ISAF SRs)2011 Passage from Selsey Bill West Sussex, MOB (drown while tethered with spinlock PFD), one fatality (Lion)2011 UK school vessel, Poor heavy weather management, one serious Injury during gybe (Liquid Vortex)2008 Galveston, TX Regatta de Amigos, keel broke off 1 death (ISAF SRs) (Cynthia Woods)2008 South China Sea race, keel lost (poor fit of the replacement keel into the hull socket, movement fatigued keel bolts), boat saved (TP 52 Strewth)2007 Coastal passage from Plymouth, keel broke off (due to fabricator modifications to the design), one fatality (Hooligan)2006 Day sail (with paying guests) in sheltered waters, two accidental gybes resulting in two injuries (Roaring Meg)2003 Delivery from Hamble, MOB Fatality (Pastime)2002 Block Island Race, unconscious MOB, 1 dead (ISAF SRs) 2002 Newport to Bermuda, rig & prop strut failed in heavy seas – Andrew 70 (ISAF SRs)1992 Vendee delivery, keel bulb broke off, one fatality (Coyote)

Page 10: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Relatively few races with stability requirementDespite ISAF SR 3.04.3 recommendation

Page 11: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Stability requirementsOffshore races*

Race Safety Rule Cat Stability Type

TranspacISAF SR with US SAILING prescriptions 1 115 ORR stability index

Tahiti race (by transpac)ISAF SR with US SAILING prescriptions 1 115 ORR stability index

Royal Vancouver and Lahaina Vic-Maui

ISAF SR not US SAILING prescriptions 1 115 ORR stability index

Newport Bermuda raceISAF SR with US SAILING prescriptions 1 115 ORR stability index

Marblehead-HailifaxISAF SR with US SAILING prescriptions 1 110 ORR stability index

Balbo YC Corona del Mar to Cabo

ISAF SR with US SAILING prescriptions 2 110 ORR stability index

Annapolis-NewportISAF SR with US SAILING prescriptions 2 110 ORR stability index

Oregon Offshore PIYA requirements 1 110 LPS

Swiftsure PIYA requirements 1 110 LPS

Pacific CupISAF SR with US SAILING prescriptions 1 105 LPS

WVYC Southern Straits Race PIYA requirements 2 100 LPS

Van Isle 360 Race PIYA requirements 2 100 LPS

* Note: The ‘coastal’ Chicago YC race to Mackinac island has added a 103 ORR SI for 2012

Page 12: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Distribution of ORR stability indexCumulative percentage

36 ORR vessels < 103

ORR cat 1recommendation

ORR Cat 2recommendation

Page 13: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Stability measurement cautionNo silver bullet in extreme conditions

• “ No yacht, no matter how stable, could consistently resist capsizing when hit beam-on, with a 55% LOA breaking Wave” (Wolfson research)

• “No correlation between yachts in trouble and any stability measurement, except weak correlation with boat size” (1998 Hobart race analysis)

• “There is a suggestion that shallow keel boats are more resistant to capsize than deep keel boats in extreme breaking wave conditions” (1994 Queen’s birthday storm)

Page 14: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

SR Header Numbers Most Modified

SR header num

ber

Number of times modified

Fundamentals & Definitions

Page 15: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Top 10 modified OSRs

Number of races modifying

Com equipment.Including AIS

Hatches & companionway

General requirements

Page 16: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Summary:

• Safety regulations are fragmented among a handful of regional constituents and become complex

• Safety regulations focus primarily on ‘minimum equipment requirements’, which are NOT core factors in recent safety incidents

• Opportunity = unify and simplify SRs to make them easier for sailors while refocusing on core safety issues

Page 17: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

A few main constituents for outreachInvite members of each into an ‘OSR user advisory committee’?

• Specific races with significant modifications– Newport to Bermuda race committee– Pacific Cup– Spinnaker Cup– Lighthouse

• Associations with custom modifications or complete standalone SRs

– SF OYRA– PIYRA– YRA of LIS– PHRF– Mac– SSS

Page 18: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Focus on root causes of recent worldwide incidents mostly not ‘minimum Equipment’ issues

1. Structural and design factorsBoat does not breakBoat does not stay upside down for a long time

2. Intense WeatherForecasting and routingHeavy weather tacticsFatigue and attitude management

3. Higher risk taking offshoreBoat selection

routing

4. Navigation & groundingsKeep head out of boatChart plotters not 100% accurate

5. MOBMost deaths have apparently been with unconscious MOB or trappedMost boats NOT following current best practices on tethers/jacklines

6. Emergency voice communication equipmentSat phone proven extremely helpful in offshore experience – ‘after the fact’

Page 19: Survey of safety regulations used in major ‘named’ US races

Next step key decisions:

• Can USSailing convince ISAF to support a ‘lite(r)’ and more focused SR? (probably not at least in a short time frame)

• Does USSailing want to develop an SR independent of ISAF?

• If so, will the various US constituents participate in and support a unified and simpler US SR?