surveillance of il-2 inducing cd4+ t cell epitopes in
DESCRIPTION
Surveillance of IL-2 inducing CD4+ T cell epitopes in acute HIV-1 infection for the emergence of escape mutants. R. Brad Jones 1 , Feng Yun Yue 2 , Colin Kovacs 3 , Ruqaya Mohamed 2 , Kelly Macdonald 1,2 , Mario Ostrowski 1,2. 1 Department of Immunology, University of Toronto - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Surveillance of IL-2 inducing CD4+ T cell epitopes in acute HIV-1 infection for the emergence of escape mutants
R. Brad Jones1, Feng Yun Yue2, Colin Kovacs3,Ruqaya Mohamed2, Kelly Macdonald1,2,
Mario Ostrowski1,2
1 Department of Immunology, University of Toronto2 Clinical Sciences Division, University of Toronto
3 Canadian Immunodeficiency Collaborative
Introduction
CD4+ T cell responses are critical in control of other chronic viral infections including: gamma herpesvirus (Cardin, 1996), LCMV and vaccinia (Leist, 1989)
Strong HIV-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation is maintained only in long-term nonprogressors (LTNP), (Pontesilli, 1999)
Vigorous HIV-1-specific IL-2 producing CD4+ T cell responses are associated with control of viremia (Rosenberg, 1997)
Is this cause or effect? High level HIV-1 viremia suppresses viral antigen specific CD4+ T cell proliferation (McNeil, 2001)
Prospective study suggests that IL-2 producing CD4+ T cell response to gag does not have prognostic value for rate of progression to AIDS (Miedema, 2006)
Delineating Cause and Effect
HIV-1 is capable of rapidly acquiring mutations which confer escape from selective pressure
We see this with gp120 mutations which escape antibody responses, drug-resistance mutations, and certain CD8+ T cell responses
If CD4+ T cells are capable of exerting immunological pressure on HIV-1, we should see the emergence of CD4 epitope escape mutations
Subject: OM214
Acute seroconverter - symptomatic: fever, rash
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Month Post Infection
Vir
al Load
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
CD
4 C
ount
Viral Load
CD4
HAART
Methods
Cloning:
Sample obtained from leukopheresis
p55 specificity was screened by ELISPOT and confirmed by FACS
Determining Eptiope Specificity of Clones:
Gross specificity determined by overlapping gag peptide pool ELISPOT and confirmed by FACS
Minimal epitope determined using truncated peptides
After CD8+ depletion, cells were stimulated overnight with p55
Enrichment for HIV-p55 specific CD4+ T cells achieved with IL-2 secretion assay (Miltenyi) and MACS
Plated at limiting dilution with irradiated feeder cells
ResultsGag p17:
“HIVWASRELER”
Gag p24:
“FRDYVDRFYK”
Gag p24:
“REPRGSDIAGT”
Fine mapping of peptide-specific Elispot responses of cloneA1
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000WASREL ERFAUN
HIVWA SREL ERFA UN
WASREL ER
VWASREL ER
IVWA SREL E
HIVWA SREL
HIVWA SREL ER
YKLKHIVWA SREL ER
SFC/ mi llion
Finemapping of peptide-specific Elispot responses of clone A2
0 10 000 0 20 000 0
YVDRFYKTL
DYVDRF YKTL R
FRDYVDRFYKT LRA E
YVDRFYKT
F RDYVDRF Y
DYVDRFYKT
FRDYVDRFYKT
PKEPF RDYVDRFYKT
SFC/million
Fine mapping of peptide- specific E lispot responses of clone B2
RGSDIAGTT
PRGSDIAGT
PRGSDIAGTT
REPRGSDIAGTTSTL
EPRGSDIA
REPRGSDI
REPRGSDIA
REPRGSDIAGT
PGQMREPRGSDIAGT
SFC/ million
HLA Restriction
ELISPOTs repeated with core peptides in presence of either anti-DQ, anti-DR, or isotype controls
Peptide + clone + B cell line
Clone + BCL
Clone + BCL + anti-DR
Clone + BCL + anti-DQ
Two clones from OM214 ‘MREPRGSDIAGT’ and ‘FRDYVDRFYK’ are DQ restricted
Specifically ‘FRDYVDRFYK’ is restricted by DQB1*05011/DQA1*010101
IL-2
Control
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104G1ÉFL2-H, FL4-H subset
FL1-H: CD69-FITC
FL
2-H
: IL
-2-P
E
0.025
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104
G5ÉFL4-H, FL2-H subset
FL1-H: CD69-FITC
FL
2-H
: IL
-2-P
E
0.015
“FRDYVDRFYK” “REPRGSDIAGT” “HIVWASRELER”
CD69
Epitope Responses in ex vivo PBMCs
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104
P55ÉFL2-H, FL4-H subset
FL1-H: CD69-FITC
FL
2-H
: IL
-2-P
E
0.053
Autologous p55
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104
G21ÉFL2-H, FL4-H subset
FL1-H: CD69-FITC
FL
2-H
: IL
-2-P
E
0
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104june-G5ÉFL3-H, SSC-H subset
FL4-H: CD69-APC
FL
1-H
: IL
-2-F
ITC
0
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104
june-G1ÉFL3-H, SSC-H subset
FL4-H: CD69-APC
FL
1-H
: IL
-2-F
ITC
0
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104June-g7ÉFL3-H, SSC-H subset
FL4-H: CD69-APC
FL
1-H
: IL
-2-F
ITC
4.96e-3
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104June-p55ÉFL3-H, SSC-H subset
FL4-H: CD69-APC
FL
1-H
: IL
-2-F
ITC
0
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104
june-dmsoÉFL3-H, FL1-H subset
FL4-H: CD69-APC
FL
1-H
: IL
-2-F
ITC
0
“FRDYVDRFYK” “REPRGSDIAGT” “HIVWASRELER” Autologous p55Control
IL-2
CD69
Month 2:
Month 12:
0 0.025 0.021 0.015 0.053
00 0.005 0 0
Sequencing
Performed on circulating plasma viruses
Limiting dilution methodology with direct sequencing from PCR product
Phylogenetic trees constructed to ensure that patient’s sequences cluster together
Sequences screened for hypermutation
Types of Mutations Observed
Mutations in Core Epitope
Extended Epitope/Processing Mutations
Frequencies of Mutations Observed
Month 2 Month 5 Month 12
TSILDIRQGPKEPFRDYVDRFYK 4/10 0/8 0/10
ASILDIRQGPKEPFRDYVDQFYK 0/10 1/8 1/10
ASILDIRQGPKEPFRDYVDRFYK 6/10 7/8 9/10
Month 2 Month 5 Month 12
MREPRGSDIAGT 5/10 0/8 0/10
MREPGGSDIAGT 1/10 0/8 0/10
IREPRGSDIAGT 4/10 8/8 10/10
Mon Month 2 Month 12
RLRPGGKKKYRLKHIVWASRELERFAVNPGLLESAS 10/10 3/10
QLRPGGKKKYRLKHIVWASRELERFAVNPGLLESAS 0/10 3/10
RLRPGGQKKYRLKHIVWASRELERFAVNPGLLESAS 0/10 2/10
RLRPGGKKKYRLKHIVWASRELERFAVDPGLLESAS 0/10 1/10
RLRPGGKKKYKLKHIVWASRELERFAVNPGLLETSE 0/10 1/10
Frequencies of Mutations Observed
Epitope Mutation
FRDYVDRFYK FRDYVDQFYK
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104OM214 clone A2+G5ÉFL3-H, FL2-H subset
FL3-H: CD4-Percp
FL
2-H
: IL
-2-P
E
55.9
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104OM214 clone A2+G21ÉFL3-H, FL2-H subset
FL3-H: CD4-Percp
FL
2-H
: IL
-2-P
E
0
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104G21ÉFL2-H, FL4-H subset
FL1-H: CD69-FITC
FL
2-H
: IL
-2-P
E
0
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104G1ÉFL2-H, FL4-H subset
FL1-H: CD69-FITC
FL
2-H
: IL
-2-P
E
0.025
100 101 102 103 104100
101
102
103
104SUMO-CATÉFL2-H, FL4-H subset
FL1-H: CD69-FITC
FL2
-H: I
L-2
-PE
6.4e-3
Clone A2:
PBMCs:Control FRDYVDRFYK FRDYVDQFYK
0.025 0
55.9 0
0.006
Flanking Mutations
Clone and express autologous p55 with and without flanking mutations
Test ability to stimulate clones
Med10ug/ml p55
1ug/ml p55 SEB
wt Flanking mutations(FM)
10ug/ml p55
1ug/ml p55 Med
2ug/mlFM p55
2ug/mlSUMO-CAT
2.5ug/mlwt p55 SEB
Clone A2‘FRDYVDRFYKT’
Clone B2‘REPRGSDIAGT’
Flanking mutations do not confer escape to A2 or B2
Conclusions
Loss of IL-2 secreting CD4+ T-cell response accompanied disease progression
An escape mutation in an IL-2 inducing CD4+ T cell epitope within the MHR was confirmed
This mutation arose within 6 months of infection and was maintained at a frequency of 10%, for at least 1 year
Rapid progression occurred in OM214 despite early induction of an IL-2 producing CD4+ T cell response - including a potent MHR-directed response
IL-2 producing CD4+ T cell responses are capable of exerting immune pressure on HIV-1, resulting in escape mutations
Generalized loss of IL-2 responses with time suggests that immune dysfunction due to viremia is an important mechanism for viral escape from immune pressure
Acknowledgments
Elizabeth YueMario Ostrowski
Maple Leaf Clinic:Colin Kovacs
Roberta Halpenny
Macdonald Lab:Ruqaya Mohamed
David Willer
Kaul Lab
Sample Donors