surrealism and war gallery guide
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Surrealism and War Gallery Guide
1/8
Happnings*July 3 to 19, OCCUPATION, Ongoing Workshop by Ehren Tool (Closed Sundays, Mondays & July 4),10AM to 5PM *
*Saturday, July 5, 4041 OPEN HOUSE, Open House with Ehren Tool, 10AM to 5PM **Friday, July 11, I JUST MAKE CUPS, Artist Talk by Ehren Tool, 6:30PM *
*Friday, July 25, FLASHLIGHTS & FILMS AFTER DARK , 7:30PM Flashlight Tour, 8:30PM Surrealist Shorts & Feature **Saturday, August 30, THE EXQUISITE CORPSE, Workshop, 3PM to 5PM *
*Saturday, September 6, SURREALISM & WARRIOR WRITERS, Poetry Reading, 3:30PM to 5PM **Saturday & Sunday, September 6 & 7, SURREALISM & WARRIOR WRITERS, Writing Workshop, 10AM to 3PM *
*Friday, September 19, FLASHLIGHTS & FILMS AFTER DARK, 7:30PM Flashlight Tour, 8:30PM Surrealist Shorts & Feature **Saturday, September 27, SURREALISM & WAR, Curator Talk & Round Table Discussion, 3PM *
*Saturday, November 1, SURREALISM & WAR, Closing Reception, 2PM to 5PM *
National Vtrans Art Musum
4041 North Milwaukee Avenue, 2nd floor, Chicago, IL 6064110AM to 5PM, Tuesday to Saturday, NVAM.ORG
-
8/10/2019 Surrealism and War Gallery Guide
2/8
e Exquisite Corpe of the Unknown Vtran
#12
#13
#16
#17
-
8/10/2019 Surrealism and War Gallery Guide
3/8
The Surrealist believed there is an ab-
sence of meaning created by the structural
contradictions of modern society, which is
ruled by rational thought while dominated
by war and oppression. Furthermore, the
Surrealists believed that in order to trans-form this absence of meaning, individuals
and society needed to be freed from the
oppressive rules of modern society. Andre
Breton, World War I veteran and the
primary surrealist theorist, articulated
this position in a radio interview, ... in a
violent reaction against the impoverish-
ment and sterility of thought processes
that resulted from centuries of rational-
ism, we turned toward the mar velous and
advocated it unconditionally.a
It is this turn toward the marvelous
and the surreal that many veterans
make in order to create meaning out of
traumatic war experiences. SURREALISM
& WAR is a collection of veterans ar twork
that explores the transformation of this
traumatic absence of meaning through
the intentional and unintentional use ofSurrealist processes and concepts.
Automatism
In an interview with Stan Gillett about
SURREALISM & WAR he said, My whole
military experience, I can say, was surreal
... For example, just being in the military
marching around with hundreds of other
people doing the same thing, s aying kill
kill kill was surreal to begin with. And it
just got more and more surreal as Vietnam
came in to it. Like, for example, I think
we went over on Pan American Airlines.
We have hundreds of GIs all dressed in
fatigues ... sitting there, being waited
on, and going over to Vietnam with the
intention of killing people. That was in my
mind not realistic, that was surreal. It just
got more and more surreal. ... We killed
a man my first night. A little Vietnamese
person with a handgun stepped over all
the trip wires. We were getting ready t o
break ambush and here he was. Standing
right in front of us. There were four or five
of us in an ambush group. This grizzly
sergeant behind me was trying to teach me
the ropes, he was the first one to recognize
what to do. He stood up, shot a burst off
from his M16 and shot this man through
the neck. Then all our armament went outbecause we thought he was the lead of a
group. So we just blew off all our arma-
ment. Hours later, turns out he was the
only guy. He was probably visiting his wife,
trying to get back home. That was surreal.
I thought I would go insane.
Gilletts reflections align well with
the Surrealist critique of a modern
society ruled by rational thought while
dominated by what he called insanity.
Gillett responded to this insanity with
the use of what the Surrealists called
automatismthe avoiding and rejection
of conscious thought in the process of
creative production.bIn discussion about
the work C4 Explosion (1) Gillett noted,
I would just shove and push things
around without the intention of making
something. I would look back at it and goWow, that kind of looks like what a C4
explosion feels like. So I put that title on
it. But I wasnt trying to make it, it would
just happen. Furthermore, C4 Explosion,
Jungle Outrage, and Self Violenceresemble
many of the Surrealists decalcomanias,
an automatism transfer technique with
unforeseen results. In these works the
abstract gray fields with clouded symbols
are not unlike the Untitled(2) ink blotted
decalcomania made by Andre Breton in
1936 or the decalcomania that represents
the nightmarish vision of decayed civiliza-
tion,Europe after the Rain, made by Max
Ernst in 1940.c
Surrealists experimented with the
subconscious with the hope that the
creativity buried deep inside someones
subconscious would be more capable
of transforming the constraints of the
rational mind. Despite this optimistic
view by the Surrealists, the subconscious
also holds hidden violent potential. Gillett
expands on this saying, When I think
of Surrealism I think of soft and gentle,
but that violent streak is in there. And
the violence would come out. I think the
violence is in our nature. They didnt
get away from the mind, they didnt get
away from World War I. The Surrealism
movement was kind of a knee-jerk awayfrom the effect of World War I. They were
trying to get away from war by viewing the
mind without thinking. But they didnt
get away from violence. Violence is in our
brain whether we are going automatic or
whether we are thinking about it. If they
were trying to get away from t he war, they
were not successful.
Gilletts own subconscious violent
memories materialize in hisPaddy
Bones (3) series. Gillett recalls, The first
man we killed in the patty, lying out
naked, dead. I can see that in the Paddy
Bones, looking back on it when I was done.
When we chipped it out of the investment
and looked at it, and Mr. Olsen [a fellow
Vietnam veteran and artist] said Man,
thats Vietnam. And I had to admit that
it was.
Collage, Assemblage, & Photomontage
In American society war is often
conceptualized as a heros journey but it is
actually the experience of dehumanization
on a grand scale. Pop culture perpetuates
the hero narrative through movies, televi-
sion shows, toys, cartoons, comic books,
video games, and advertisements as the
United States government, nonprofits, and
commercial industries promote campaigns
to honor our heroes. Societys narrative
is so powerful that it often overshadows
the lived experiences of war that do not
nicely fit into the framework of t he heros
journey. Military service is more often a
collection of juxtaposed divergent memo-
ries, and irrational experiences of trauma
that are without a clear narrative structure,
language, or meaning.
Meaning is created through the relation-
ship between two things. What happens
when a relationship between two things
can no longer be established? What hap-
pens when ideas, images, objects, bodies,
and memories are taken out of their
natural setting and reestablished within
new conditions? What new relationships
are established? What new questions are
asked? What new meanings emerge?Giuseppe Pellicano explores these
questions through the fantastic melding of
humans and animals in a series titled War
Pigs (4). Giuseppe reflects, the War Pigs
are hybrids. They consist of animal and
human together within a fantasy. Theyre
of these people that fuel war. Its time to
remove the humanistic camouflage of
these politicians or people in power and
try to reveal their a nimalistic truth.
Dadaists and Surrealists historically
used the fantastic and absurd techniques
of collage, assemblage, and photomontage
in order to challenge old relationships and
create new ones. Furthermore, automa-
tism is inherent in these techniques and
could be used to explore the irrational and
subconscious. The Surrealists believed
these techniques had the potential tocreate a new reality and subvert modern
societys obsession with rational thought
and perpetuation of war.
Ehren Tool directly pulls from these
ideas in his ongoing Occupationand
Cup (5) projects. During his Occupation
project, Tool occupies a public space
for hours and hours throwing cups on
the potters wheel before stamping and
glazing the cups with military iconography
pulled from military diagrams, personal
photographs, war toys, pop culture, and
military and political propaganda. Tools
repetition of the production process
becomes automatic, almost machine-like,
Surrealism and War
A Profound Clarification of a Historical Problm AARON HUGHES
This exhibition features work by veter-
ans of the Korean, Vietnam, Persian Gulf
and Iraq wars, as well as the peacekeeping
mission in Bosnia. They are contemporary
artists, none of whom calls him or herself
a Surrealist, and most are not particularly
well-versed in the history, ideas and work-
ing methods of Surrealism. So why does
their work feel so Surreal? Why do they
seem to share the iconography, thematic
concerns, and aesthetics of this move-
ment that they are so distant from in so
many ways?
For example, J. Clays Ghost Lifeand Bill
DugansHappy Valentinetake advantage
of collage techniques that allow them
to juxtapose images and objects that
wouldnt share the same time and space in
reality. We see distorted faces and masks,
as in Randolph HarmessRitual Suicide
Maskand Theodore Gostass Getting a
Headache in a POW Camp. There are
depictions of blindfolded eyes in John
McManussPOW Series, and disembodied
parts like Robynn Murrays torsos or Ken
Hrubys War Trophy. Assemblages com-
bining found objects, such as Josef Metzs
LZ Hurricane, harken back to D uchamps
assisted readymades, created when Dada
was in its formative stages. Artists like
Stan Gillett use experimental techniques
that force the artist to relinquish control.
And there are works that depict scenes
that seem like they must have come out
of a dream, like David Keefes and Richard
Yonkas paintings. These are techniques
and imagery of Surrealism. Why would
this be so? What is the relationship
between Surrealism and the experience
of war?
Surrealisms roots were in Dada, and
Dada grew, in part, out of a response to
war. In Zurich in 1916, when the Dada
movement began, the city was populated
by expatriates from all over Europe. S ome
were pacifists, some were anarchists, some
were AWOL, and probably some were just
scared, but all had congregated in neutral
Switzerland to escape the horror of World
War I. World War I had the terrible distinc-
tion of being far and away the most brutal
war the world had yet seen. They called it
the war to end all wars; today, looking back
at the many crushing wars that followed,
that almost sounds like wishful thinking.
Many of the artists who started Dada
believed that if European values and codes
of conduct had led their culture to the hor-
ror of World War I, then the only possible
response was a wholesale rejection of it
all. They were working towards a complete
break with their cultural past; whatever
the norm or convention, a Dadaist would
do the opposite. Sometimes the Dadaists
are dismissed as nihilists who were simply
against everything. Or as pranksters, act-
ing out with a gleefully adolescent disre-
spect and with no other goal than to shock
and disrupt. Yet underneath the rejection
and the disrespect there was a passionate
and earnestly ethical position. The early
Dadaists championed the anarchic and the
chaotic, nonsense and mayhem, because
it reflected their perception of what was
happening in the world around them:
atrocities, suffering, hypocrisy, and the
incomprehensibility of the traumatic expe-
rience of war. If conventions for both art
and public decorum were a reflection of a
set of values that had led to the things they
saw happening around them, then those
conventions should be thrown out. If the
rational could not help people make sense
of the horrors they had witnessed, then
the irrational should be embraced. Hugo
Ball described the Dadaists activities at
Cabaret Voltaire like this: ...every word
spoken and sung here says at least this one
thing: that this humiliating age has not
succeeded in winning our respect.1
As World Was I ended, Dada diss olved,
the expatriates scattered, and they carried
their Dadaist goals and beliefs and strate-
gies with them. Many of the Dadaists went
to Paris and were central to the emergence
of Surrealism. Their ideas and methods
evolved, yet many of the core impulses of
Dada remained intact. Like the Dadaists,
the Surrealists believed that the irrational
might sometimes express our experiences
and concerns better than the rational. The
thing most people know about Surrealism
is that the Surrealists mined their dreams
for imagery, but the Surrealists often used
the dream itself as a kind of catchall refer-
ence to all that was inaccessible through
rational means. In 1924 in the Surrealist
Manifesto, Andre Breton wrote, I believe
in the future resolution of these two states,
dream and reality, which are seemingly so
contradictory, into an absolute reality, a
surreality...2The Surrealists argued that
if we confine ourselves to the tangible an d
the perceptible, to our conscious minds
and waking thoughts, to rationality and
pragmatismor, to put it conversely, if
we dismiss or discredit the contents of our
unconscious minds, imagination, desire
and the irrationalwe are dismissing half
of what is, and impoverishing our lives and
experiences. Only when we reach a place
where we dont make distinctions between
all these seeming oppositeswhere we
take dreams and imagination as seri-
ously as reality and are as attentive to the
irrational as we are to the rationalwill we
have any hope of fully knowing ourselves
and the world around us.
Today, our culture is probably even
more dismissive of anything it sees as
subjective, unscientific, imaginative, or
illogical than it was when the Surrealists
were making these assertions. Yet there
are experiences that cannot be approached
with the quantifying and rational tools
our culture validates, and war is a quintes-
sential example of such an experience. The
Dadaists knew this 100 years ago and it is
still true for veterans who return to us from
war zones today. For those who live it, war
is still a confrontation with the incompre-
hensible. When the events of a war exceed
rationality, perhaps veterans must engage
with the irrational and the unreal in order
to find a way to approach their own experi-
ences. The Surrealists understood that
sometimes we can only achieve any kind
of understanding of our own experiences
by embracing imagination, intuition, the
nonsensical, and the dream. Maybe this
is why the work of contemporary veterans
who are not Surrealists is so Surreal.
1. Goldberg, RoseLee.Performance Art:From Futurism to the Present. New York: H. N.Abrams, 1998. p. 62.
2. Breton, Andre.Manifestoes of Surrealism.Translated by Richard Seaver and Helen R.Lane. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,1969. p. 14.
e Surrealists and War JEANNE DUNNING
Surrealism is the natural andinevitable product of historical forces;
it is not inspired, it is caused; it did notarise from sudden divine illumination,
but like every other valuable movement,from a profound clarification of problems
historically handed down to us by theculture into which we were born.
Hugh Sykes DaviesSurrealism at this Time and Place
1936
-
8/10/2019 Surrealism and War Gallery Guide
4/8
William
Dugan
,
BACKIN
THEW
ORLD,
AGAIN
(8)
PabloPicasso,FIGURE,1935
AndreB
reton
UNTITL
ED(decalc
omania)
1936
(2)
GiuseppePellicanoWARPIGS(4)
RobynnMurray,IN
DOCTRINATION(7)
RichardYohnka,ARCADEBARKER(11)
MaxErnstTHEANGELOFTHE HOME
ORTHETRIUMPHOF SURREALISM
1937(12)
ManRay,VENUSRESTORD,1936
-
8/10/2019 Surrealism and War Gallery Guide
5/8
StanGillett,C4-EXPLOSION(
1)
StanGillett,PADDYBONES(3)
Eh
ren
Too
l,CUP
(5)
RaoulH
ausmann
,CUTWITH
THECA
KEKNI
FE,191
9(6)
Richard YohnkaDIRECT HIT (9)
Richar
dYohn
ka,
POSIT
IVEIDEN
TIFICATION
(10)
DavidKeekeRESORT(13)
DavidK
eeke
MEET
INGOF
DARK
SCOU
TAND
WING
EDBOY
(14)
Toyen,
SHOT
1939-
40(15
)
Toyen, SHOT
1939- 40(15)
JimLeedy,THEEARTHLIESS
CREAMING&ATOMICHEA
D(16)
RandolphHarmes,RITUALSUICIDEMASK
ChristopherA
rendt
GOODMORINGPT
S
D
Michae
lHelbing
SEATO
FGOV
ERNM
ENT
-
8/10/2019 Surrealism and War Gallery Guide
6/8
and the resulting collaged cups seem to
pull directly from the history of Surrealism
and reflect the collage Cut with the Cake
Knife(6) by Hannah Hoch and ABCDby
Raoul Hausmann.
These disjointed collaged cups reflect
Tools fragmented military and veteran
experience. Reflecting on his experiences
during the Gulf War Tool notes, War is so
different than normal life. ... Its something
just totally bizarre. Standing in the middle
of the desert and seeing an explosion, and
then seeing the shock wave come and then
feeling it hit you in the chest, and turning
around and watching it go off into the
distance. ... Thats not normal, thats not
real. And then coming back to Disneyland
where nobody knows what youre talking
about, Oh, I saw it on TV! you know,
Great show! It feels kind of like youre in
a dream ...
These ideas are also reflected in Iraq
veteran Robynn Murrays triptych of body
cast collages,Indoctrination(7),Baghdad,
andHealing. The series represents the
arch of her military experience. In speak-
ing aboutIndoctrinationshe said, I used
materials from different army training
manuals ... If you look up closely youll
find manuals on how to salute. ... it shows
the beginning of me being put int o the
mold of a soldier. Murrays casts create a
void of the broken body now absent. This
void reflects the gap between the irrational
experience of war and the supposedly
rational society that perpetuates that war.
Vietnam veteran William Dugan was
also dealing with the transition from
combat to civilian life through assemblage.
Dugan reflects, Back in the World,
Again(8) is about how it felt to come back.
The pieces of bone, brass, shells, braided
in the creatures hair and hanging from
its belt, are tokens, mementos, souvenirs,
and transitional objects of our life. ...
When I got back, it was not what we all had
thought. Everything had changed. Our in-
nocence was gone, and we had memories
of things that you didnt really want to talk
about to people.
Memories, Dreams, & Nightmares
Vietnam veteran, Richard Yohnka, said,
There is the real and there is the dream.
You make art somewhere between the real-
ity of being and the reality of becoming.
Children often dream of the epic
adventures of the American military.
Fun, Travel, and Adventure was one of
the many Army slogans used during t he
Vietnam War. What happens when the
idealism of slogans dissipates and the
childrens games become the nightmares
of a war filled with irrational experiences
and emotions? What happens when thesociety dominated by rational thought can
no longer rationalize what is happening?
What happens when language loses its
meaning? What happens when rationality
becomes the irrational, the root of trauma,
the structure of oppression, and the his-
toric problem passed down? What happens
when traumatic memories, dreams, and
nightmares dominate the everyday?
In YohnkasDirect Hit(9),Positive
Identification (10), and Theres Plenty to
Suckhe depicts ripped apart figures with
exposed bones and loose skin through
vigorous pastel line work. In reflecting
on these drawings Yohnka notes, These
figures are the vehicle of my interpreta-
tion of the moments in Vietnam that deal
with the remoteness, transcendence, and
finality of life. They are silent screams,ritual destruction, intoxication, insanity,
sorrow, and death. They are images of
power, but also represent savage men.
They are caught between the image of a
soldier dehumanized by war and that of
man trapped in a state of raw self-conflict.
Throughout his work Yohnka continues
to depict his experience in Vietnam as
bodies in raw physical and psychological
conflict. He goes on to note, The physical
act of war contains many ingredients: the
personality of heroism, horror, a strange
glamour, destruction, and desolation. I
have internalized the experience of the
physical act of war and transformed it into
the metaphorical gestures of the human
form. The living form becomes a brutal-
ized icon.
In Yohnkas paintingsArcade Barker (11),
DodgeM, Scary-Go-Round, andShell
Gamehe depicts these brutalized icons
in vibrant colors as beasts with monster
heads, sharp teeth, and the bodies of men
in the uncanny environment of a carnival.
This setting is unnerving as it reflects the
excitement of childrens games trans-
formed into explosive nightmares filled
with anger and trauma. Furthermore,
in these works, Yohnkas human figures
have literally transformed into monsters
just as individuals in the midst of war
have the potential to lose sight of their
own humanity, snap, and transform into
irrational destructive beasts. These night-
marish scenes represent the contradiction
between what he called the ingredients of
war; heroism, horror, glamour, destruc-
tion, and desolation.
There is a long history of Surrealist
artists visualizing this contradiction
through figurative work. For example, in
one of his strongest political comments,
Ernst painted The Angelof the home or the
Triumph of Surrealism(12), a work that
depicts a nightmarish fairy that represents
the wave of fascism overtaking Europe at
that time. This same kind of gestural figure
represented in a surreal space can also be
seen in Ernsts 1921 painting, The Elephant
of Celebes.
Looking back into the Surrealist archive
it is not hard to find work that relates to
the contemporary dreamscapes of David
Keefes paintingsResort(13) andMeeting of
Dark Scout and Winged Boy (14). Less com-
mon is the specific haunting atmosphere
and sense of dread that Keefes paintings
evoke. However, whether it was inten-
tional or not, Keefes work harkens to the
work of the great Surrealist artist Toyen.
Working in the Czech and considered a
degenerate by the occupying Nazis, Toyen
made haunting landscapes that negotiated
memory, everyday objects, and the oc-
cupation. Specifically, Shot(15) a series of
drawings she made in 1939 to 1940, reflects
ominous landscapes and testifies to the
terror of the ongoing occupation and war.
The series depicts highly rendered deso-
late landscapes scattered with fractured
masks, skeletons, animal fragments, cages,
graves, and children resulting in surreal
and eerie landscapes.d
Keefe similarly creates highly rendered
surreal landscapes that do not reflect any
rational world but a world that collapses
time and space. Keefe said, My work is
about multiple historiesmy childhood
mixed with whats going on in my life
today. These different histories collide
in a timeless fashion. I start with certainimagery whether its a memory from child-
hood or an experience in Iraq, and all of
the sudden images and time collapse.
This mixing of time and space creates
a disjointed surreal world fraught with
unexpected objects, subjects, and emo-
tions. For example,Resortexternalizes the
hidden danger of the explosive death lying
just under the thin ice. Keefe continues,
I grew up fishing in Minnesota, and thats
whereResortcomes from ... an ice fishing
scene with me as a little boy ... but under
that ice are these bombs that I remember
from Iraq. The fish become bombs and the
bombs become fish. This lets me explore
and expose the boundaries between
reality and memory, between chronologi-
cally-lived experiences and simultaneity.
Fishing as a young boy and serving a tourof combat duty in Iraq converge at the
same time...
This collapsing of time, space, and
identity in Keefes paintings creates
relationships between traumas, objects,
and spaces that are irrational but reflect
real experiences and memories resulting
in hauntingly surreal landscapes. The
Meeting of Dark Scoutand Winged Boy is
again based on a specific memory. Keefe
notes, This little boy who I met in Iraq,
almost immediately in my mind became
me as a child. ... Its this meeting between
myself as a marine ... and meeting myself
as a kid, but also meeting this little boy
that I met in Iraq. And the images that
happen around me are the same images
that are recurring in my head. ... All of
these things continue to just cycle in
my mind and therefore I wanted to
recreate that.
This repetitive, perhaps obsessive, focus
on recreating spaces, objects, and subjects
from memories and dreams is also seen
in Jim Leedys workAtomic Head(16) and
The Earth Lies Screaming(16), a massive
skull and wall of bones, skulls, and geese
rising out of the darkness. The work is
based on a recurring nightmare from
his deployment to Korea. Leedy recalls,
There was a let-up in the war and I wentswimming. The water was calm and you
could almost see yourself in it. I jumped in
and swam out. I was amazed that I could
see my reflection. All of the sudden I saw
through my reflection and on the bottom
of the lake was rotting bodies, corpses,
just hundreds of them. It was a surreal
experience I admit. But it was a scary
experience. I felt like I was s wimming in
the rotting bodies. That had a big impact
on me and it was one of the things that
I had nightmares about for years after I
got out of the army. The making of that
wall and the skull head (Atomic Head)
emancipated me from my dreams, and I
never had a bad dream after that. I did not
enjoy doing anything with skulls after that.
It was Surrealism, and it was emancipation
from the fear and horror.Leedy was one of only two Americans
invited to participate in the largest
Surrealist exhibition ever assembled
at the Retretti Art Center, Finland, an
exhibition that began with Miro, Dali, and
Duchamp, and culminated with several
works by Leedy. However, he also would
not describe himself as a Surrealist. When
speaking about The Earth Lies Screaming,
Leedy added, I think of it as something
more powerful than Surrealism, something
more like Realism ... In the same s ense that
war is unbelievable, sometimes Surrealism
is unbelievable. But war is realism, and its
fact ... Its not dreamlike ... War is Realism
and my wall is Realism.
For Leedy, The Earth Lies Screaming
andAtomic Head are at once real, surreal,
and his emancipation from the fearand horror of war experiences. As the
haunting memories and nightmares began
to dominate his days and nights Leedy
began to obsessively work with s kulls
and bones as he sought out signs and
symbols, a language, to make meaning
out of an irrational experience. It is this
mining of ones own subconscious for
a new language beyond the rational
that is Surrealist in its approach. Leedy
bridges the divide between the dream
life and real life by making irrational
dreams into physical realities. Once he
had constructed the physical signs and
symbols of a new abstract language from
solid clay his experience was no longer
buried in nightmares but brought into
reality through the physical objects he
created. Leedy exploited his irrational,
nonsensical, and subconscious traumas
in order to build a new reality.
Conclusion: From war to Surrealism
Reflecting on the historic relationship
between war and Surrealism, Vietnam
veteran Michael Helbing stated, You can
certainly see why World War I turned into
Surrealism, in a certain respect. It took the
everyday normal and just totally upended
it and it made it screwed up, in the worst
sort of way. And war does that. To me at
least, youre trained to think and believe
and have certain awareness systems ...thrust into you and then you find out that
really doesnt exist. So then you have to
build your own world again, your own
reality, your own methodology to make
sense out of what makes no sense.
This process of making sense out of
nonsense evokes what Davies describes
as the profound clarification of a historic
problem handed down... Wars rupture of
modern society resulted in the Surrealists
profound clarification that rational
thought, which produced the systems,
culture, and machines that perpetuated
war and oppression, must be rejected and
revolted against. With this grounding the
Surrealists pulled from Sigmund Freuds
theories on the subconscious and the
political ideology of Marxism to begin this
revolt. The Surrealists continually exter-nalized the nonsense and contradictions
they saw in modern society because they
did not see these contradictions solely as
individual traumas to be transformed but
as political issues to confront.
Today, in contemporary American
society, the irrational experiences of war
and resulting traumas are framed as indi-
vidual psychological reactions to adverse
experiences. This use of psychoanalytic
theory to individualize the experience
of war also depoliticized it. Leaving the
historic problems that metaphorically and
literally explode in service members faces
to be reconciled in isolation.
SURREALISM & WAR is a rejection of
this isolation. SURREALISM & WAR brings
together an intergenerational group of vet-
eran artists to explore the historic connec-tions between the experience of war and
Surrealism in order to demonstrate that
the traumatic and irrational experience of
war, and the nonsense of the societies that
perpetuate war, are not personal conflicts
for individuals to resolve but a historic
problem handed down to us to revolt
against and transform.
a. Andr Breton, as quoted in RadioInterviews with Andr Parinaud (19131952) inConversations: The Autobiography of Surrealism.(Paragon House English, 1993) 63.
b. Gibson, Jennifer. Grove Art Online. London:Oxford University Press, 2009.
c. Gale, Matthew.Dada & Surrealism.(London: Phaidon, 1997) 391.
d. Durozoi, Gerard. History of the SurrealistMovement. (Chicago: University of ChicagoPress, 2004) 481.
Sketch for the exhibition poster by Jerome Grand
-
8/10/2019 Surrealism and War Gallery Guide
7/8
#21
#28
#29
#30
-
8/10/2019 Surrealism and War Gallery Guide
8/8
The amazing NVAM staff including Executive Director Levi Moore, D irector
of Programming Sarah Eilefson, Gallery Coordinator Destinee Oitzinger,
Education Coordinator Christine Bespalec-Davis, Web Developer and
Multimedia Coordinator Patrick Putze, Assistant Education Coordinator
Lauren La Rose, Social Media and Communications Coordinator Georges
Toumayan, and 2013-2014 interns Lydia Wassman, Kayla Gerdes, Jonathan
Fenton, and Aireal Weber for their many hours of meetings, phone calls,
emails, exhibition promotion, and material development that made
SURREALISM & WAR possible.
The National Veterans Art Museum Board Members Ron Gibbs, Jim Moore,
Carol Sherman, Ken Nielsen, Mike Helbing, Nancy Ronquillo, Art Jacobs, Julie
Chavez, Phil Maughan, Caroline OBoyle, Becky Flaherty, Aaron Hughes, and a
special thank you to Board Chair Lionel Rabb for his vision and leadership.SURREALISM & WAR financial sponsors, The Rabb Family Foundation,
Illinois Arts Council, and The City of Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs
and Special Events. The exhibition would not have happened without their
generous support.
Aaron Hughes, SURREALISM & WAR Curator
National Veterans Art Museum Art Committee Chair
#12
The Exquisite Corpse of Abed Ibrhem Omran
Drawn by Anastasia D ouka, Jiyoung Yoon, and Yunyu Shih
Anastasia Douka wrote Abed Ibrhem Omran was a second lieutenant who died in t he
Tartous area in Syria on the day I was drawing the head of the exquisite corpse. The cause
of his death was a shooting. I found no picture online.
#13
The Exquisite Corpse of Alex Minsky
Drawn by John Henley, Lora Lode, and Colin Ewald
John Henley wrote Alex Minsky, a marine who lost his legs and whose skin was
burned in Afghanistan, who came home and suffered from alcoholism. He turned his life
around, covered the burns with tattoo s, and became an underwear model.
#16
The Exquisite Corpse of John Horse (Juan Caballo), 1812-1882
Drawn by Ryan Griffis, Hyla Willis, and Christiane D.
Ryan Griffis wrote John Horse was born of African and indigenous parents in 1812 in
central Florida. He would become a leader of resistance fighters composed of escaped
slaves, free blacks and Seminole allies during the S econd Seminole War.
#17
The Exquisite Corpse of Lt. Colonel Theodore Raphael D.D.S.
Drawn by his daughter Judith Raphael, his son-in-law Tony Phillips, and his great
granddaughter Zoe Gordon
e Exquisite Corpe of the Unknown VtranJEANNE DUNNING
SURREALISM & WAR has only come together with the amazing work,
mentorship, and support of so many inspiring individuals and institutions. The
National Veterans Art Museum Art Committee would like to especially thank:
The contributing veteran artists Chris Arendt, J. Clay, William Dugan,
Stan Gillett, Theodore Gostas, Randolph Harmes, Michael Helbing,
Ken Hurby, Kim Jones, David Keefe, Jim Leedy, John McManus, Josef Metz,
John Miller, Robynn Murray, Grady Myers, Giuseppe Pellicano, Ehren Tool,
Richard Yohnka, and the nearly 100 artists that contributed to the Exquisite
Corpse of the Unknown Veteranproject organized by Jeanne Dunning and
Aaron Hughes.
Jeanne Dunning for sharing her time, wisdom and energy to help build a
successful exhibition and organize a key contribution, The Exquisite Corpse
of the Unknown Veteran. Her vision and drive are what brought The ExquisiteCorpse of the Unknown Veteranto realization. Additionally, Jeanne provided
indispensable guidance on curating the exhibition and contributed two
fabulous articles, The Surrealist and War and The Exquisite Corpse of the
Unknown Veteran.
Jerome Grand for his beautiful and powerful design skills that were
generously donated to develop the SURREALISM & WAR graphics and layout
of the posters, pos tcards, and newsprint takeaway.
Jennifer Cohen, Mark Levitch, Jordana Mendelson, and Janine Mileaf for
their curatorial reflections and mentorship.
Mission Printing and News Gazette Community Newspapers for their
printing services.
List of Exquisite Corpe
Aknowledgmnts
The Dadaists (who we might think of
as proto-Surrealists) used to play a word
game that worked like this: someone wrote
an adjective on a piece of paper, folded it
so that the word he or she had written was
hidden, and passed it to a new player, who
in turn wrote a noun, folded the paper
again, and passed it to a third person, who
contributed a verb, etc. This continued
until, with the addition of a few articles
and prepositions, they had collectively
written a sentence. That this sentence
would not make much logical sense, and
would be characterized by non-sequiturs
and inexplicable juxtapositions, was the
point; by ceding control and intention in
the creative process the Dadaists hoped to
facilitate the emergence of a poetry that
none of them individually could ever have
dreamt of.
The Surrealists took up this game, and
after 1924 it came to be called by the name
of the protagonist that emerged in the
first sentence the Surrealists wrote when
they played it: The exquisite corpse will
drink the new wine. The Surrealists also
adapted the game to drawing. In its visual
form, one person draws the head and folds
the paper over it before he or she passes it
to the second player who draws the body
and then in turn passes it off to a third
player who contributes the legs and the
feet. The name exquisite corpse seems
marvelously descriptive of the strange,
chimera-like bodies that inevitably
emerge. Eternally playful and exploratory,
the Surrealists engaged in many variations
on the game; there are even exquisite
corpse landscapes.
In conjunction with SURREALISM &
WAR, Aaron Hughes and I asked artists to
participate in a variation of the exquisite
corpse game that is suggested by both
the exhibitions themes and the name of
the game itself. Specifically, we asked t he
artist who initiated each corpse to begin
by choosing a veteran whose corpse the
drawing would represent. We told the art-
ists that their corpse could be the corpse
of anyone who served in t he military,
whether they served in a war or not,
whether they are alive or dead, whether
the artist knows them or not. It could be
the corpse of someone who died or was
injured, someone who the artist is grateful
did not die or get injured, someone the
artist is close to or a historical figure or
someone famous, someone who served
in the U.S. military or in the military of
any other country. We hope that asking
people to make their corpse the corpse of a
specific veteran draws attention to the fear
we have for the life of every veteran that
is implicit in their service. If someone we
know, someone we care about, is serving
in the military, we inevitably imagine that
they could die, and we dread the thing we
have imagined.
Yellow ribbons, military recruiting
advertisements, combat-themed video
games and movies, and controversies
about the role of the military and whether
we should be engaged in certain wars at all
have become an ever-present background
to our daily lives. Yet it is strange how
many Americans have no contact at all
with those who serve. The military may be
in our minds but too often the individuals
who serve are not. For far too many people,
veteranswhat they have gone through,
what challenges they face now, even
simply who they aretruly are unknown.
These corpses, and the varied past and
present veterans represented in them, are
an acknowledgement of the way those who
have served have touched our lives.
#21
The Exquisite Corpse of Major Nidal Malik Hasan
Drawn by Mary Patten, Elise Gardella, and Julia Shirar
Mary Patten wrote Nidal Hasan killed 13 people and wounded many others in Fort
Hood, Texas in November, 2009. All but one of those killed were fellow s oldiers. Born in
the U.S. of Palestinian parents, Hasan joined the army in 1995 and was commissioned
two years later. Under the auspices of the army, he went to medical school where he
specialized in preventive and disaster p sychiatry. He is now awaiting execution in Fort
Leavenworth, Kansas. The terrible paradoxes that riddle this story parallel the bigger
schizo-narrative of the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
#28
The Exquisite Corpse of an Unidentified Soldier Volunteer
Drawn by Craig Yu, Selina Trepp, and Andreas Fischer
Craig Yu wrote The image I chose to reference is of a soldier volunteer having a neu-
rological test performed on him in a United States army chemical weapons test program
that ran from 1955 to 1972. I chose him because of the soldiers anonymity and because it
raises questions about personal and institutional control.
#29
The Exquisite Corpse of the Unknown Child of Kosovo
Drawn by Giuseppe Pellicano, Brian Mathew, and Ryan Walsh
Giuseppe Pellicano wrote Born in conflict, instilled with its hatred, this child of war
unwillingly lived as a combatant and dies as a veteran.
#30
The Exquisite Corpse of Victor F. Nettles
Drawn by Bea Nettles, Steve Kostell, and Megan Diddie
Bea Nettles wrote I chose my father Victor F. Nettles. He never talked about his mili-
tary service but even as a child I could see that he was proud to be in uniform. He left for
active duty early in 1941 and served as a major during the battle of Angaur, where he was
awarded a Bronze Star. The description of these days in his memoirs is harrowing, with a
huge contrast between days of bombardment and live shelling and the act of looking for
beach shells during quiet breaks.