surgical damage control

55
SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL Bradley W. Thomas, MD LCDR MC USN Constanta Trauma Symposium 12 JUNE 2013

Upload: ksena

Post on 23-Feb-2016

79 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL. Bradley W. Thomas, MD LCDR MC USN Constanta Trauma Symposium 12 JUNE 2013. OUTLINE. 1. Definition/description 2. Who needs it 3. Operative techniques 4. ICU techniques 5. Reoperation techniques 6. Expected outcome. Navy Definition. “ the capacity of a ship to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

SURGICAL DAMAGECONTROL

Bradley W. Thomas, MDLCDR MC USN

Constanta Trauma Symposium12 JUNE 2013

Page 2: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

OUTLINE1. Definition/description2. Who needs it3. Operative techniques4. ICU techniques5. Reoperation techniques6. Expected outcome

Page 3: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Navy Definition“the capacity of a ship

toabsorb damage andmaintain mission

integrity”Naval War Publication 3-20.31,Dept Defense, 1996(c/o Paul Possenti, PA-C,Bridgeport Hospital)

Page 4: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Stage 1: DC1 Control hemorrhage Limit peritoneal contamination Temporary abdominal closureStage 2: DC2 Hypothermia prevention/treatment Correction of coagulopathy Correction of acidosisStage 3: DC3 Definitive surgery May require multiple surgeries Creation of ostomies, feeding access, fascial

closure No longer than 72 hours from Stage 1 Data from Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. ‘Damage control’: an

approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma 1993;35(3):375.

Initial Damage Control Stages

Page 5: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 6: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

“Despite the lethality of injuries, if a wounded solider survives the rapid transport to a military medical facility with surgical capability, the likelihood of survival is now higher than any previous recorded conflict.”

Eastridge BJ, Jenkins D, Flaherty S, et al. Trauma system development ina theater of war: experiences from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation

Enduring Freedom. J Trauma 2006;61(6):1366.

Page 7: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Lethal Triad

Page 8: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

WHO NEEDS DAMAGECONTROL?

Intraoperative Sequelae of Shock

Initial or persistent hypothermia Initial or persistent metabolic Acidosis Nonmechanical bleeding* * * * * “metabolic failure”

Page 9: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

WHO NEEDS DAMAGE CONTROL? DISTINGUISH

BETWEEN GROUPS

May StabilizeTemp 35 CpH > 7.2BD > -10

Near-ExsanguinatedTemp < 34 CpH < 7.1BD -15 -20HR/SBP>0.9

Page 10: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Stop hemorrhage

Near-exsanguinated↓

May stabilize↓

↓Consider def.

operation

↓Damage control

WHO NEEDS DAMAGECONTROL?

Distinguish Between Groups

Stop hemorrhage

Page 11: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 12: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

2.  Liver3.  Pancreas

DAMAGE CONTROLControl Visceral Hemorrhage

4.  Kidney

1. Spleen

Page 13: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Immunitypreserved

Immunitysuppressed

DAMAGE CONTROLSpleen

Grade I-II Grade III-IV

Repair→10-15min←Resect

Repair→15-30min

Page 14: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

SPLENECTOMY IS HARMFUL

1. Lose splenic filter

2. Lose production of

3. Lose immunosuppression

IgMTuftsinOpsoninProperdin

Page 15: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

SutureVicryl mesh tamponade

DAMAGE CONTROLSpleen

Surgicel/Avitene/Fibrin glue

Perisplenic packing

Page 16: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 17: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 18: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

1500 ml/minTherefore, a poorly chosen

damage control technique

DAMAGE CONTROLLiver

Has a blood supply of

is likely to fail in thecoagulopathic patient

Page 19: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Raw surface

DAMAGE CONTROLLiver

Balloon catheter tamponade → Track

Absorbable mesh tamponade → Fx

Compression

Perihepatic packsSubc. hematoma

Page 20: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 21: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 22: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

More selective, but time-consuming

Resectional debridement with S.V.L.

DAMAGE CONTROLLiver

Hepatotomy with S.V.L.

Page 23: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 24: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 25: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 26: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

HEPATIC TRAUMAOMENTAL PACK

Control intrahepatic venous hemorrhageManage dead spaceBring mobile macrophages to site of injuryH.H. Stone, 1975; H.L. Pachter, 1979; T.C. Fabian, 1980

Page 27: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 28: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 29: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

bleeders Suture

Control retropancreatic largebleeders Divide

DAMAGE CONTROLPancreas

Control peripancreatic small

Defer distal pancreatectomy toreoperation

Page 30: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 31: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Palpate normal sized kidneyon opposite side beforeperforming needed

DAMAGE CONTROLKidney

nephrectomy

Page 32: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Isolate holes Umbilical tapes

Resect holes Stapler

DAMAGE CONTROLControl GI Contamination

Close holes 1 layer, suture

Severe colon Colostomy at reop.

Page 33: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 34: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Nephrectomy

DAMAGE CONTROLControl Arterial Hemorrhage

Celiac a.Sup. mes. a.Renal a.Iliac a. Shunt or ligate,

fasciotomy, fem-fem

LigateShunt

Page 35: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 36: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

DON’T IGNORE LIKELY SEQUELAE

X-clamp abd. aorta, CIA, EIA→

Bilateral or ipsilateral fasciotomy

DAMAGE CONTROLControl Arterial Hemorrhage

Page 37: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 38: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Retrohepatic vena cava Pack

DAMAGE CONTROLControl Venous Hemorrhage

Common or external, Ligate iliac, infrarenal, IVC SMV, Portal

Pelvic Veins

Clamps, Tacks, Omentum

Page 39: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Atriocaval Shunt

Page 40: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

DON’T IGNORE LIKELY SEQUELAE

Ligate portal vein or SMVSilo/NPD and reoperation at 12hours

DAMAGE CONTROLVenous Hemorrhage

X-clamp or ligate infrarenal IVCBilateral fasciotomy

Page 41: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 42: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

A simple but eloquent idea

Managing the Open Abdomen

J. Trauma 48:201-7, 2000

Page 43: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 44: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 45: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 46: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Avoid conductionAvoid evaporation

Keep bed dryKeep skin dry

DAMAGE CONTROLICU Phase

Treatment of Hypothermia

Standard Warming maneuversRoom, Head, Lung, Trunk, IVs

Page 47: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

TREATMENT OF ACIDOSISAcidosis uncouples B-adrenergic

receptors at cellular level

DAMAGE CONTROLICU Phase

Test dose 50-200 mEq HC03 if pH<7.2 and patient failing

Page 48: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

*Check for missed injuriesComplete GI resections, repairs,

reconstruction or diversion

Removal of packs/Evaluate hemostasis

Passage of nasojejunal feeding tube/Formal jejunostomy

Fascial closure vs. VAC

DAMAGE CONTROLReoperation

Page 49: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

1.  Components/modified2. Biologic Mesh3. Absorbable mesh, delayed

DAMAGE CONTROLClosure/Coverage Options

STSG, leave a big hernia

Page 50: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 51: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL
Page 52: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

1.  Ventral Hernia2. EC Fistula3. Intraabdominal Abscess

DAMAGE CONTROLComplications

Page 53: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

Initial opsICU/LOS

ABDOMINAL DAMAGE CONTROLOutcome

56 consecutive patients with damage

Sutton E: JT 61: 831, 2006

control laparotomy:

MortalityReadmissionsLate mortality

4.4 ± 2.217/3027%76%0%

Page 54: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

2.  Limited OR time using techniques3.  Surgeons control ICU phase

1.  Choose based on criteria

4.  Don’t miss injuries at reoperationalways pass feeding tube

5.  Expect 50-75% survival

DAMAGE CONTROLSummary

Page 55: SURGICAL DAMAGE CONTROL

DAMAGE CONTROLSummary

“….. Advances in surgery are measured by events, and damage control surgery has been

one of the greatest advances in trauma surgery in the last 20 years …..”

Hiram C. Polk, M.D.