surface dressing

Upload: luci99

Post on 08-Jan-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Surface Dressing

TRANSCRIPT

  • THE ROAD SURFACE TREATMENTS ASSOCIATION

    Surface Dressing & Micro-Surfacing

    Dr Howard RobinsonChief Executive

    1www.rsta-uk.org

  • Surface Dressing Long History of Use

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Performs 2 functions which relate directly to the essential requirements in the European CPD

    Safety Skid ResistanceIncreases macro & micro texture with minimum usage of scare high quality aggregate

    Durability Preventative Maintenance Seals underlying surface from ingress of water and air

    3

    Surface Dressing

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Single Dressing

    Racked-In

    Double Dressing

    Sandwich Dressing

    4

    Surface Dressing techniques

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Carriageways

    Footways

    Cycleways

    Car parks

    5

    Surface Dressing Applications

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Treatment composition kg/m2

    Material Single Dressing

    Double Dressing

    40mm Asphalt

    SurfacingBinder 1.0 1.5 6.0

    Aggregate 12.0 21.0 93.0

    6www.rsta-uk.org

    Finite Resource ConsumptionFinite Resource Consumption

  • Comparative Costs and Life

    www.rsta-uk.org

    Type Application /m2+/10%

    ExpectedLifeyears

    6mmSingleSurfaceDressing Estateroads,ruralareas 1.50 7 10

    10&6mmRackedInDressing Urbanroads,quieter 1.80 7 10

    14&6mmDoubleSurfaceDressing(relativelynew)

    Busyurbanroads,higherstress,gradient,bend

    2.20 7 10

    Prepatchingadditionalcost Rural,urbanroads 1.00 1.50 n/a

    MicroAsphalt14mm MainlyUrbanlocations 3.00 7 12

    Microasphalt+regulating+ironworksraised

    MainlyUrbanlocations 3.50 4.00 7 12

    HighFrictionSurfacing Highstressareas 9 12 5 10

    Retexturing bushhammer Anywhereexposedaggregates

    2 3 3 5

    GilsonitePreservative Anywhere 0.8 1 3 5

    AsphaltReinforcementGeocomposites/Geotextiles

    Urban,trunkroads 5 8 Increaseslifebyfactorof4

  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20Years

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

    Years

    O v era ll cond ition

    O vera ll cond ition

    G ood

    G ood

    P oor

    P oor

    S urface d ressing

    S urface d ressing

    D e fects v is ib le

    P a tch ing

    R econstruction

    S urface d ressingS urface d ressing

    Source : Aspha lt S urfac ings, S teven S t John

    8

    Surface DressingExtending time to structural maintenance

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Work ongoing at University of Nottingham to develop process maps and capture energy data for a range of surface treatments that can then be fed into asPECT

    Asphalt Pavement Embodied Carbon Tool

    9

    Carbon Footprint

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • www.rsta-uk.org

    Quality ControlQuality Control

  • Chipping Spread Rate Test

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • www.rsta-uk.org

    Binder Spread Rate Test

  • www.rsta-uk.org

    Carpet Tile Spray Bar Test

  • www.rsta-uk.org

    SpecificationSpecification

    SHW Clause 922SHW Clause 922BSEN 12271BSEN 12271

    PD6689PD6689

  • Procurement

    Method 1 Specified by end product performance - Cl 922 of SHW

    Method 2 Specified by recipe - Cl 919 of SHW

    Method 1 defines a product and therefore the Construction Product Regulation applies and BSEN12271

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Clause 922

    Thecontractormust... Produceadesigntoachievealevelofperformancee.g.

    macrotextureandalsoadesignlife

    InstalladressingthatmeetsrequirementsofNHSS13a Provideaqualityplan BecompliantwithBSEN12271 Providea2yrguarantee Provideevidencehisspraytankerandchippingmachinecan

    achievethedesiredrateandaccuracyofspread

    ProduceaselfcertifiedTAIT

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • BSEN 12271 EffectiveinUKfromJanuary2011 PD6689providesUKguidance Specifiesarangeofpropertiesandcategoriestoenableappropriatelimitingvaluestobesetforawiderangeofuses

    CEMarkingcurrentlynotmandatoryinUK

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • PD 6689 Constituent Materials

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Binders

    UnmodifiedbindersmustconformtoBSEN13808emulsions

    PMBsareproprietarymaterialsandClauses919and922requirethesetohaveBBAHAPAScertificates

    BSEN12271includesameasureofbindercohesion(VialitTest)

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Modified BindersModified BindersVialitPendulumCohesion

    Vialit Cohesion BS EN 13588

    HA SHW Clause 939

    Grades (minimum Peak Cohesion):

    Super premium binder 1.4J/cm2

    Premium binder 1.2J/cm2

    Intermediate 1.0J/cm2

    Unmodified* 0.7J/cm2

    *threshold level for guidance only

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • PD 6689 Aggregates

    HD36adviseswhatPSVandAAVtobeusedonasitebysitebasis. ThePSVisrequiredtoensurethedurabilityofskiddingresistance

    AggregatesusedinsurfacedressingshouldconformtoBSEN13043

    RecommendationsforgradingsofchippingsareinPD66822:2009,Table4

    BSEN13043alsorecommendsthat,forsurfacedressing,thefinescontentshouldbef1(i.e.notmorethan1%passing0.063mmsieve)

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • PD 6689 Performance Criteria

    PerformancecategoriesinPD6689havebeenchosenfromBSEN12271:2006,Table2

    TheserecommendationsrelatetheHAUCroadtypestogetherwiththedesignclassificationsfromRN39

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • EN 12271:2006(E) - Table 2

  • Type Approval Installation Trial (TAIT)

    TAITsarethemeansbywhichaproducerdemonstratestheabilitytodesignandinstallagrouporfamilyofsurfacetreatmentsmeetingtherequiredperformancecharacteristics

    TAITscanalsobeusedasthebasisforCEmarking

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Type Approval Installation TrialRecommended Portfolio

    TAITs are the responsibility of the producer and must be verified by a notified body

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Factory Production Control (FPC)

    BSEN12271specifiesaFPCsystem aroutetoCEmarking FPCensuresthedesignprocedureisdocumented,therelevantcontrols

    andtestsarecarriedoutatminimumfrequencyandrecordsarekept

    AllproducersaccreditedtoNHSS13amusthaveaQAsystemwhichmeetsFPCrequirementsandareaccreditedbynotifiedbodies

    TheSectorSchemeisarequirementoftheSHWandrequiresproducerstodemonstratethecompetenceoftheirworkforce

    ThereisascheduleofsuppliersaccreditedtoNHSS13amaintainedbyLantra

    Theattestationofconformityis2+

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Surface Dressing Design Guide

  • SurfaceTemperatureCategory

    RoadHardness

    Traffic

    Geometry

    Chippingproperties

    Design Input Data

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Surface Temperature Category

    Table 7.2.1 - Approximate Surface Temperature Categories

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Road Hardness Category

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Road Hardness Category

    very soft

    soft

    normal

    hard

    very hard02468

    10121416182022

    10 15 20 25 30 35 40

    Road surface temperature (C)

    P

    r

    o

    b

    e

    p

    e

    n

    e

    t

    r

    a

    t

    i

    o

    n

    (

    m

    m

    )

    Figure 7.2.2 Hardness categories from depth of penetration and road surface temperature for Different Surface Temperature Categories

    Category B

  • Traffic

    Table 7.2.3 Traffic Categories

    Categories converted from msa to cv/l/d assuming a growth rate of 2% over the design life.

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Geometrics

    Gradients

    Bends

    Junction and Crossings

    = STRESS

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Chipping Properties

    PSV refer to HD36/06 or Figure 7.3.1.

    AAV Not greater than 14

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Other Data Required

    General Surface Condition

    Season

    Shade

    Local Traffic

    Noise

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Season

    Figure 7.3.2 Surface Dressing Season

  • Tree Shade

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Noise

    Increasing texture depth

    I

    n

    c

    r

    e

    a

    s

    i

    n

    g

    n

    o

    i

    s

    e

    (

    d

    B

    A

    )

    6mm

    10/6mm

    10mm

    14/6mm

    14mm

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Designing the Dressing

    Site Suitability

    Sections within the Site

    Choosing the Dressing type and Binders

    Using the Design Proforma

    Selecting the Rate of Spread

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Site Suitability

    Figure 8.1 - Effect of Existing Road Surface Characteristics on Achievable Performance Levels

  • Choosing The Right Dressing

    Figure 8.3aSelection of Type of Surface

    Dressing for Lightly-Trafficked Sites

  • Binder Rate of Spread - Table 9.2.2

    Racked In Dressing

  • Relatively low cost and high productivity Extends road life and delays major maintenance spend Reduced traffic management costs and road user costs Efficient use of aggregates/binder and minimal waste Up to 10 year life if properly designed and executed A strategic option for de-carbonising roads Can help to prevent potholing

    www.rsta-uk.org

    Surface DressingBenefits

  • Better,tougherbinders=betterchipretention Lowtemperatureemulsions(undertrial) Betteremulsionbreakcontrol Bettermobileplant improvedspraying/spreadingaccuracy Closerattentiontoachievinggoodcompaction Closerliaisonwithhighwayauthorities Improvedaftercare BettertrainedoperativeswithCSCScards(SectorScheme13a)

    Surface DressingInnovation

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • MicroMicro--SurfacingSurfacing

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Micro-Surfacing

    Apolymermodifiedcoldpavedasphalt

    Thickness6to15mm

    Uses

    rutfilling/levellingcourse

    sealing

    fillingpotholes

    correctsravelling/bleeding

    improvesskidresistance(highervolumeroads)

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Micro-Asphalt Description

    Slurrysurfacingintroducedinthelate1950s Primarilyusedasapreservativetreatmentforairfield

    runwaystypicalaggregatesizeforslurrysurfacing03mm Slurrysurfacingnowmorewidelyknownasmicroasphaltsor

    microsurfacingwithtypically06mmaggregates Microasphaltisamixtureof:

    Aggregates(coarseandfine) PMBemulsion Water Cementorhydratedlime Possiblyfibres Chemicalbreaking agent

    Theblendofmaterialsisbatchedinsituandlaidbyapurposebuiltselfpropelledmicroasphaltpaver

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Slurry Seal and Micro-Asphalt

    Footwayslurrysealismechanicallymixedandhandappliedusingabrushtoprovidesurfacetexture.Nonpolymermodifiedbitumenemulsionandaggregatesizesof03mm

    Thincarriagewayandairfieldslurrysealisusuallylaidupto5mmthickusinga03mmaggregateandnonpolymerbitumenemulsion.Laidmechanicallyandissuitableforurbanareasandairfieldtaxiways

    Microasphalts firstlayerregulatesandreprofilestheexistingpavement secondlayerprovidesadensesurfacewithgoodtexturedepthand

    wetskiddingresistance.

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • SLURRY / MICROSURFACING

  • Composition

    Aggregates

    Mineralfiller

    Water

    Bitumenemulsion

    Fieldcontroladditive

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Aggregate selection

    Strong,durable

    100%crushedparticles

    Typeofrock

    Reactivityoffines critical!

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Aggregate Gradation

    Sieve size mm

    Slurry Micro- surfacing

    5.0 100 100 70-90 2.36 95-100 75-100 45-70 1.18 70-95 55-90 28-50 .600 55-75 35-70 19-34 .300 30-50 20-45 12-25 .075 5-15 5-15 5-15

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Mineral Fillers

    Portlandcement

    Hydratedlime

    Modifyflow&settingcharacteristics

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Bitumen Emulsion Selection

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Polymer

    Purposes

    reducestemperaturesusceptibility

    improvesstiffness

    Types

    latex(liquid)

    solids

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Field Control Additive

    Affectsbreaktime

    temperature&aggregatereactivity

    Typeandamount

    amines(0.1%)

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Surface Curing

    Mixtime

    timeremainingfluid(30180s)

    Settime

    expulsionofclearwater&initialdevelopmentofcohesion

    Traffictime

    sufficientcohesionfortraffic(20minto4hrs)

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Mix Design Criteria

    Mixingtests

    Cohesiontest

    Testsforbindercontent

    Performancerelatedtests

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Mixing & Cohesion Tests

    Mixtime&settime Handmixedfor30s

    Partpouredout.Clearwaterexuded settime

    Partstirreduntilstiff mixtime

    Cohesiontest Rolledintoball&droppedonfloor

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Tests For Binder Content

    Wettrackabrasion(WTAT) BS434aggregatetest(max500g/m)

    Loadedwheeltest

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • www.rsta-uk.org

  • www.rsta-uk.org

  • Site Selection Client Side

    Highwayclientslooktomicrosurfacingtoimprove:

    Appearance coveringsurfacedefects Profiling regulationofthesurface SkidResistance replacescontactsurface SubsurfaceProtection sealingtheroadagainstwateringress

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • A Potential Micro-Surfacing Site

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Micro-Asphalt Paver

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • WATER

    BITUMEN

    AGGREGATE

    SPREADER BOX

  • Computer Controlled Batching

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Applied through the Spreader Laying box

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Compaction using a Pneumatic Tyre Roller (PTR)

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • After Care

    Readyfortrafficafter20minutes Sweepafter24hours RaiseIronworknextday Applyroadsafetymarkingsafter72hours Removetrafficmanagementsigns

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Slurry-Micro SurfacingApplications

    Carriageways

    Footways

    Cycleways

    Car parks

    Playgrounds

    Airfield runways

    Reservations and Islands

    73www.rsta-uk.org

  • Benefits

    Restorationofinstantaneousskiddingresistanceandtexturedepthlevels

    Quickinstallation,withminimumdisruptiontotrafficflows

    Environmentallyadvantageouswithlittleornotoxicemissionsandnoheatenergyrequired

    Financialcostbenefits

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • BSEN 12273 Micro-Surfacing

    UK guidance contained in PD 6689 BSEN 12273 will be implemented in UK in

    January 2011 By that time all contractors must have in place:

    BSEN ISO 9001 QA systems, FPC, TAITs UK specification controlled by SHW Cl.918

    contractors must be compliant with Sector Scheme 13b

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Specification Requirements

    Aggregates to BS EN 13043 Binders to BS EN 13808 Cationic Bitumen

    Emulsions Mix design declared by producer 1 year after installation:

    visual assessment of defects surface macro-texture

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • BS EN 12274 Test Methods

    1. Sampling

    2. Residualbindercontent

    3. Consistency mixdesign

    4. Cohesionofmix mixdesign

    5. Wearing(wettrackabrasion) mixdesign

    6. Rateofapplication

    7. Shakingabrasion(binder/aggregateaffinity)mixdesign

    8. Visualassessment

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Clause 918

    Contractordesign RegistrationtoSectorScheme13B TAITtoBSEN12273 Aggregatemin.PSV&max.AAV(FI20 omitted) Performancerequirements

    Assessmentofdefects&macrotexture 2yearguarantee(macrotextureinitially,1&2years) Normally1yearfornontrunkroads

    Specifieshowtoexecutetheworks BBAHAPAScertificationformodifiedbindernolonger

    required Bondcoatspecified

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Notes for Guidance on Clause 918

    Clause 942 thin surfacing applicable to micro-surfacing for roads carrying > 250 cv/l/d or allowing speeds > 60 mph

    Categories given for visual assessment of defects from lightly trafficked roads (Cat. 1) to dual

    carriageways (Cat. 4)

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • Performance RequirementsRequirement Unit Category

    0 1 2 3P1 bleeding, etc. % NPD 8 2 0.5

    P2 delamination, aggregate loss, etc.

    % NPD 8 2 0.5

    Macrotexture mm NPD 0.2 0.4 0.6

    Noise (macrotexture) mm Declared maximum

    ConstituentsBinder cohesionAggregate PSV

    Aggregate micro-Deval

    J/cmDeclared class/category

    (AAV in UK)Slurry type Defined by maximum aggregate

    size & binder type

  • Design Manual for Roads and BridgesVolume 7 Section 5 Part 2 HD37/99

    SHW Series 900

    Clause 918 - Slurry Surfacing

    Clause 919 - Surface Dressing Recipe

    Clause 922 - Surface Dressing Performance

    Clause 927 - Micro-surfacing

    EN 12271 Surface Dressing (FPC + test methods)

    EN 12273 Slurry-Micro Surfacing (FPC + test methods)

    PD6689: 2009 Surface Treatments

    NHSS 13a Surface Dressing and 13b Slurry-Micro Surfacing

    Road Note 39 and RSDA Code of Practice

    81

    Guidance

    www.rsta-uk.org

  • THANKS FOR LISTENING!

    Visitwww.rstauk.org forourcalendaroftrainingcourses

    www.rsta-uk.org