supreme court of india on record do not seek … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will...

116
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE :- REQUEST FOR ‘ NOT TO DELETE A MATTER’, SHALL BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE MENTIONING OFFICER. ALL CIRCULATIONS ( IF THE MATTERS ARE NOT ON BOARD FOR THE DAY ) NEED NOT BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE BENCH AND THE SAME SHALL BE HANDED OVER TO THE CONCERNED COURT MASTERS IN ADVANCE BEFORE 10.30 A.M. [ THIS BENCH WILL ASSEMBLE AS SOON AS HEARING IN SPECIAL BENCH MATTER LISTED IN THIS COURT AT 10.30 A.M. IS OVER ] REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters 101 C.A. No. 166/2017 XVI BHAGWAN SINGH SUBHRO SANYAL Versus M.D. CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORP . AND ANR. P. NARASIMHAN Appeal Against Orders Of Statutory Bodies - Appeals and other matters U/Ss 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 102 C.A. No. 1122-1123/2013 XVII BIDHYADHAR RUCHI KOHLI Versus UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4] Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters 103 C.A. No. 10118/2013 III-A SECUR INDUSTRIES LTD. RUPESH KUMAR Versus GODREJ AND BOYCE MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. T. MAHIPAL Mercantile Laws, Commercial Transactions Including Banking - Matters relating to Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Reinforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

Upload: others

Post on 14-Apr-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE:-REQUEST FOR ‘ NOT TO DELETE A MATTER’, SHALL BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE MENTIONING OFFICER.ALL CIRCULATIONS ( IF THE MATTERS ARE NOT ON BOARD FOR THE DAY ) NEED NOT BE MENTIONED BEFORETHE BENCH AND THE SAME SHALL BE HANDED OVER TO THE CONCERNED COURT MASTERS IN ADVANCEBEFORE 10.30 A.M.[ THIS BENCH WILL ASSEMBLE AS SOON AS HEARING IN SPECIAL BENCH MATTER LISTED IN THIS COURT AT10.30 A.M. IS OVER ]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

101 C.A. No. 166/2017XVI

BHAGWAN SINGH SUBHRO SANYAL

VersusM.D. CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORP . AND ANR. P. NARASIMHAN

Appeal Against Orders Of Statutory Bodies - Appeals and other matters U/Ss 30 and 31of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007

102 C.A. No.1122-1123/2013XVII

BIDHYADHAR RUCHI KOHLI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR

MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

103 C.A. No. 10118/2013III-A

SECUR INDUSTRIES LTD. RUPESH KUMAR

VersusGODREJ AND BOYCE MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. T. MAHIPAL

Mercantile Laws, Commercial Transactions Including Banking - Matters relating toSecuritisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Reinforcement of Security

Interest Act, 2002.

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

104 C.A. No.3293-3294/2017XIV-A

DAYA KISHAN GOEL SUBHASISH MOHANTY[P-1]

VersusRAMESH CHANDER GOEL . AND ORS. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA,

RAHUL GUPTA[CAVEAT],GAGAN GUPTA

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:50:47

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Mercantile Laws, Commercial Transactions Including Banking - Matters relating toSecuritisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Reinforcement of Security

Interest Act, 2002.

105 C.A. No. 3181/2009IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP.BANK LTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE, SACHIN

PATIL[R-1], NARESH KUMAR

105.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17727/2008IX

THE MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP. BANK LTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE[R-6]

105.2

ConnectedC.A. No.3278-3279/2009IX

LIQUIDATOR BOARD,G.D.S.S.K.LTD., THR. ITSMEMBER PRABHAKAR (PETITIONER NO.1 IS SAMEIN BOTH MATTERS)

NARESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusMAHARASHTRA STATE COOP.BANK LTD.. THR. ITSCHIEF OFFICER AND ORS.

SACHIN PATIL[R-1], RAJESHMAHALE[R-1], SUSHILBALWADA[R-1],RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL[R-1], ASHA GOPALANNAIR[R-1]

105.3

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20915/2008IX

PRAKASH S/O SAHEBRAO GAVALI AND ANR. AMOL NIRMALKUMARSURYAWANSHI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY . ANDORS.

RAJESH MAHALE[R-5]

105.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 3185/2009IX

PARMESHWAR SAHEBRAO MANDE SUNIL KUMAR VERMA

Versus

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE, SACHINPATIL[R-1], RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL, D. S.MAHRA[R-1]

105.5

ConnectedSLP(C) No.19398-19399/2008IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

VersusMAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OP.BK.LIMITED AND ORS. M. Y. DESHMUKH[R-1],

RAJESH MAHALE[R-4],[R-14], SUSHILBALWADA[R-7]

105.6

ConnectedSLP(C) No.20228-20230/2008IX

PRABHANI Z.S.K.UNION THR.GEN.SECRETARY CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, SUSHIL

BALWADA, RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL

105.7

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27740/2011IX

JALGAON DISTRICT CENTRAL COOP BANK LTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. S.M. JADHAV AND

COMPANY[R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-8]

105.8

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28496/2011IX

JALAGAON DISTRICT CENTRAL COOP BANK ANDANR.

M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

105.9

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28042/2011IX

JALGAON DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANKLTD.

M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS.

105.10

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30476/2011IX

AUTHORIZED OFICER JALGAON DIST. CO OP BANKLTD.

M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA STATE OFMAHARASHTRA . AND ORS.

105.11

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 619/2012IX

JALGAON DISTT. CENTRAL COOP BANK LTD ANDANR.

M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

105.12

ConnectedSLP(C) No.12238-12239/2014IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP. BANK LTD ETC.THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR MR. SUDHIRMAHADEV MHETRE

M. Y. DESHMUKH[P-1], [P-1]

Versus

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

ASHOK GULABRAO CHAVAN AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS.

105.13

ConnectedSLP(C) No.12241-12242/2014IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE COOPRATIVE BANK LTD.(THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR)

M. Y. DESHMUKH[P-1]

VersusGOPINATH BABURAO JANGLE UDAY B. DUBE[R-1]

Mercantile Laws, Commercial Transactions Including Banking - Others

106 C.A. No. 4211/2010IX

H.D.F.C.BANK LIMITED K ASHAR & CO.[P-1]

VersusKISHORE K.MEHTA KHAITAN & CO.[R-1]

J S WAD AND CO[INT]

Matters Relating To Judiciary - Matters pertaining to service conditions , etc., ofindividual Judicial Officer and other matters not specified above

107 C.A. No. 10093/2011XI-A

AJAYA KUMAR DASH VINODH KANNA B.[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF ORISSA . AND ANR. SURESH CHANDRA

TRIPATHY[R-1], SIBOSANKAR MISHRA[R-2]

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

108 C.A. No. 8818/2011XVI

CENTRAL WARESHOUSING CORP. AND ANR. P. NARASIMHAN[P-1]

VersusRAM NARAYAN INDORIA M.P. PARTHIBAN[R-1]

Matters Relating To Judiciary - Matters pertaining to service conditions , etc., ofindividual Judicial Officer and other matters not specified above

109 W.P.(C) No. 388/2009X

AMITAVA BANERJEE AMITA SINGH KALKAL[P-1]

VersusHIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA THROUGH ITSREGISTRAR GENERAL

KUNAL CHATTERJI[R-1], PLRCHAMBERS AND CO.[R-2]

110 C.A. No. 10759/2017III-A

NARESH SINGH TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ORS.

ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1],[R-4], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-2], [R-3]

IA No. 2/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

110.1

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 670/2017X

NARESH SINGH TUSHAR BAKSHI

Versus

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABADAND ANR.

SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:50:58

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

101 C.A. No. 1920/2010III

DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. DUA ASSOCIATES

VersusATUL LTD.TH. G.M PUJA SHARMA

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters in which sentence awarded is up to five years

102 Crl.A. No. 901/2011II-A

RAM NANDAN PANDEY T. MAHIPAL

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

103 C.A. No. 2437/2010XIV-A

M/S H.J.BAKER AND BROS.INC. . BINA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusMINERALS AND METALS TRAD.COR.OF (I)LTD. PUNEET TANEJA[R-1]

103.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No.12870-12871/2011XIV

MMTC LTD. PUNEET TANEJA

VersusM/S. H.J. BAKER AND BROS. INC. THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR

BINA GUPTA

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:51:26

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

104 C.A. No. 5312/2011IV

DIST. FOOD AND SUPPLIES CONTROLLER HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

VersusM/S. BHARAT RICE MILL DINESH KUMAR GARGI.A. No. 5/2012 (Application of impleadment ofapplicant as Respondent) and I.A. No. 65002/2017(Application for permission to file counter claim)&I.A. No. 65011/2017 (Application for condonationof delay in filing counter claim) in C.A. No. 5314of 2011.List all the three matters.

104.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 5314/2011IV

DISTRICT FOOD AND SUPPLIES CONTROLLERKURUKSHETRA HARYANA

KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

VersusM/S. NAGPAL RICE MILL (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA, RAVI

PRAKASH MEHROTRAIAFOR [Application for Impleadment] ON IA 5/2012FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE COUNTER CLAIM ONBEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT] ON IA65002/2017FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA65011/2017IA No. 5/2012 - Application for ImpleadmentIA No. 65011/2017 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 65002/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILECOUNTER CLAIM ON BEHALF OF THERESPONDENT

104.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 5313/2011IV

DIST. FOOD AND SUPPLIES CONTROLLERKURUKSHETRA HARYANA

KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

VersusM/S. SAIN DASS RICE MILL DINESH KUMAR GARG

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 2

105 C.A. No. 3464/2010XVI

SHAMBHU SHARMA T. MAHIPAL

VersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

Mercantile Laws, Commercial Transactions Including Banking - Bank Guarantee matters

106 C.A. No. 10828/2010III

AQUAFIL POLYMERS CO.P.LTD. SHEELA GOEL[P-1]

VersusICICI BANK . AND ANR. ABHISHEK SINGH[R-1], Y.

RAJA GOPALA RAO[R-2]FOR ON IA 85329/2009FOR ON IA 89164/2009IA No. 89164/2009 - addl. docsIA No. 85329/2009 - addl. docs

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

107 C.A. No. 4529/2010XIV-A

NTPC LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS NATIONALTHERMAL POWER CORPORATION) AND ANR.

PUNEET TANEJA

VersusSAI ENGINEERING FOUNDATION TARUN JOHRI

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:51:34

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

108 C.A. No. 4527/2010XIV-A

NTPC LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS NATIONALTHERMAL POWER CORPORATION) AND ANR.

PUNEET TANEJA

VersusSAI ENGINEERING FOUNDATION TARUN JOHRI

109 C.A. No. 4525/2010XIV-A

NTPC LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS NATIONALTHERMAL POWER CORPORATION) AND ANR.

PUNEET TANEJA

VersusSAI ENGINEERING FOUNDATION SOCIETIES TARUN JOHRI

110 C.A. No. 2058/2012XIV-A

SOM DATT BUILDERS-NCC-NEC(JV) ARVIND MINOCHA

VersusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTH.OF INDIA . AND ORS. SANTOSH KUMAR - I

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:51:45

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE:-CONSTITUTION BENCHREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Five Judges Bench Matter - Five Judges Bench Matter

501 SLP(C) No. 804/2017XIV

KARMANYA SINGH SAREEN AND ANR. GAURAV SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONSDEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONSSECRETARY AND ORS.

T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRASREYAS[INT], [R-1][INT],SANJAY KAPUR, S. S.SHROFF, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-1][GR]

FOR [application for directions] ON IA 1/2017FOR [application for directions] ON IA3/2017matter to be listed at 2.00p.m. on21.07.2017IA No. 1/2017 - application for directionsIA No. 3/2017 - application for directions

501.1

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 347/2017PIL-W

PALLAV MONGIA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH

MAKKER[R-1], SANJAYKAPUR[R-2], BALAJISRINIVASAN[R-6], [R-5], M.P. DEVANATH[R-8]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:54:20

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Five Judges Bench Matter - Five Judges Bench Matter

502 W.P.(C) No. 104/2015PIL-W

ANOOP BARANWAL PRASHANT BHUSHAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICESECRETARY

ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-1]

FOR [AMENDMENT OF W.P. , RAISINGADDITIONAL FACTS, ADDITIONAL GROUNDS,ADDITIONAL PRAYERS] ON IA 2/2015

502.1

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1043/2017PIL-W

ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY ASHWANI KUMARDUBEY[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR

MARORIA[R-1], AMITSHARMA[R-2]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.27484/2018-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:54:26

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Five Judges Bench Matter - Five Judges Bench Matter

503 C.A. No. 7513/2005XII-A

STATE OF A.P. AND ORS. G. N. REDDY[P-1], [P-1],VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES

VersusB. ARCHANA REDDY . AND ORS. D. MAHESH BABU, VIPIN

KUMAR JAI, KAMINIJAISWAL, K. N. RAI, LAWYERS KNIT & CO

503.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 70/2006XII-A

JAMIAT-ULAMA-E-HIND SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusK.KONDALA RAO . AND ORS. R. C. KOHLI

503.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 7619/2005XII-A

MUNSIF DAILY EJAZ MAQBOOL

VersusSTATE OF A.P. . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, D.

MAHESH BABU, G. N.REDDY[R-2]

503.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 72/2006XII-A

MOHD. KHURSHID AND ORS.

VersusB. ARCHANA REDDY . AND ORS. D. MAHESH BABU, K. N. RAI

503.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 7618/2005XII-A

SULTAN-UL-ULOOM EDUCATION SOCIETY EJAZ MAQBOOL

VersusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, G. N.

REDDY[R-1], D. MAHESHBABU

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

503.5

ConnectedC.A. No. 71/2006XII-A

ASADUDDIN OWAISI JOHN MATHEW

VersusSTATE OF A.P. . AND ORS. D. MAHESH BABU, K. N. RAI,

G. N. REDDY[R-2]

503.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 19-34/2006XII-A

THE A.P.COMMN.FOR BACKWARD CLASSES ANDANR.

MAHFOOZ AHSANNAZKI[P-1], VENKAT PALWAILAW ASSOCIATES

VersusB.ARCHANA REDDY . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, R. C.

KOHLI, K. N. RAI, G.RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, D.MAHESH BABU, C. S. N.MOHAN RAO, ABHIJITSENGUPTA

503.7

ConnectedC.A. No. 2806/2006XII-A

STATE OF A.P. AND ANR ETC. AND ANR. VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES, G. N.REDDY[P-1]

VersusN. SUSHIL KUMAR REDDY & ORS ETC. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

503.8

ConnectedC.A. No.2628-2637/2010XII-A

STATE OF A.P. AND ORS. G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusT.MURALIDHAR RAO & ORS.ETC. LAWYER S KNIT &

CO[CAVEAT], SHAKILAHMED SYED[CAVEAT],SARAD KUMARSINGHANIA[CAVEAT],NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[CAVEAT],MINAKSHI VIJ, BALAJIa SRINIVASAN, ABHIJITSENGUPTA[CAVEAT],VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES

503.9

ConnectedC.A. No.2638-2639/2010XII-A

JAMIAT ULEMA-E-HINDJ A.P. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusT. MURLIDHAR RAO . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT &

CO[CAVEAT], D. BHARATHIREDDY, ABHIJITSENGUPTA[CAVEAT]

503.10

ConnectedC.A. No. 6206/2010XII-A

SULTAN-UL-ULOOM EDUCATION SOCIETY EJAZ MAQBOOL

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THROUGH ITSSECRETARY LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS AND JUSTICE

LAWYER S KNIT &CO[CAVEAT], SHAKILAHMED SYED[CAVEAT], G. N.REDDY, [R-1], ABHIJITSENGUPTA[CAVEAT]

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

503.11

ConnectedC.A. No.8875-8883/2010XII-A

A.P.STATE BACKWARD CLASSES COMMN. AND ANR. MAHFOOZ AHSANNAZKI[P-1], VENKAT PALWAILAW ASSOCIATES

VersusT.MURALIDHAR RAO . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT &

CO[CAVEAT], Y. RAJAGOPALA RAO, SHAKILAHMED SYED[CAVEAT],SARAD KUMARSINGHANIA[CAVEAT],RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON,NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOaKATNESHWARKAR[CAVEAT],G. N. REDDY, D. BHARATHIREDDY, ABHIJITSENGUPTA[CAVEAT]

503.12

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18379/2012XII-A

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS. D. S. MAHRA, [P-1], SHAKILAHMED SYED

VersusR.KRISHNAIAH . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT &

CO[CAVEAT], URMILA SIRURIA No. 4/2016 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION

503.13

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 279/2012X

RIJAS V. SHAREEF AND ANR. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusINDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

503.14

ConnectedC.A. No. 2262/2013XII-A

FAISAL SAIFI (MINOR) SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE

VersusR.KRISHNAIAH AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT &

CO[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI

503.15

ConnectedC.A. No. 2265/2013XII-A

WASIM AKRAM SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE

VersusR.KRISHNAIAH AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT &

CO[CAVEAT]

503.16

ConnectedC.A. No. 2261/2013XII-A

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITSJOINT SECRETARY

SUSHMA SURI

VersusC.SAI VISHNUVARDHAN AND ANR. LAWYER S KNIT &

CO[CAVEAT], Y. RAJAGOPALA RAO

503.17

ConnectedC.A. No. 2264/2013XII-A

THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REP BY ITS JOINTSECRETARY DEPT OF HIGHER EDUCATION

SUSHMA SURI

VersusK.SWAMY AND ORS. ANISH KUMAR

GUPTA[CAVEAT],SHUVODEEP ROY[CAVEAT]

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

503.18

ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 2404/2017XVI-A

ALL INDIA RAILWAY STATION NON DEPARTMENTRESTAURANT TEA AND FRUIT STALL CONTRACTORSWORKER ASSOCIATI

VIPIN KUMAR JAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.IA No.136846/2017-EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 136846/2017 - EX-PARTE STAY

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:54:31

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Five Judges Bench Matter - Five Judges Bench Matter

504 W.P.(C) No. 196/2018X

TAMIL NADU MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATIONAND ORS.

KHAITAN & CO.[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH

MAKKER[R-1], GAURAVSHARMA[R-2], M. YOGESHKANNA[R-3]JOSE ABRAHAM[IMPL]

IA No. 44472/2019 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 47548/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

504.1

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 252/2018X

KERALA GOVERNMENT INSURANCE MEDICALOFFICERS ASSOCIATION

JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], G.

PRAKASH[R-3]FORFOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA51023/2018FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA51028/2018FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA47621/2019FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA47626/2019FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA48862/2019FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA49994/2019FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA49999/2019FOR impleading party ON IA 50009/2019FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA50907/2019IA No. 50907/2019 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

IA No. 49994/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 48862/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 47626/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 47621/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 51028/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 51023/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 50009/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 49999/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

504.2

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 295/2018X

BALU MADHUKAR PATIL JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY[IMPL],G. PRAKASH[IMPL]

Relief : to provide for a seperate source of entryfor in-service candidates seeking admission todegree courses (medical)

504.3

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 293/2018X

DR. SAHIL YADAV AND ORS. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.Relief : provide for a seperate source of entry forin-service candidates seeking admission to degreecourses(Medical)

504.4

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26665/2019XVI

DEBASIS SIL AND ORS. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

VersusMD. NAZIR HOSSAIN AND ORS. AVIJIT MANI

TRIPATHI[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.169552/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.169546/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION(SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.169550/2019-DELETINGTHE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

504.5

ConnectedSLP(C) No.25487-25490/2019XVI

MD. BABUL AKHTAR AND ORS. TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN

VersusMD. NAZIR HOSSAIN AND ORS. AVIJIT MANI

TRIPATHI[CAVEAT], GAURAVSHARMA[R-1]ATUL KUMAR[INT]

IA No. 164696/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 179894/2019 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

IA No. 167903/2019 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 169585/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 169584/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

504.6

ConnectedSLP(C) No.26448-26449/2019XVI

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. CHANCHAL KUMARGANGULI

VersusMD NAZIR HOSSAIN AND ORS. AVIJIT MANI

TRIPATHI[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.169465/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT]

504.7

ConnectedSLP(C) No.26507-26510/2019XVI

MADHUMITA BASU AND ORS. ROBIN KHOKHAR

VersusMD. NAZIR HOSSIAN AVIJIT MANI

TRIPATHI[CAVEAT]IA No.170064/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

504.8

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26648/2019XVI

VICE CHANCELLOR WEST BENGAL UNIVERSITY OFHEALTH SCIENCES AND ORS.

SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusMD. NAZIR HOSSAIN AND ORS. AVIJIT MANI

TRIPATHI[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.171180/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

504.9

ConnectedDiary No. 42890-2019XVI

DR. SK. RAHISUL RAHAMAN AND ORS. RANJAN MUKHERJEE

VersusDR. MADHUMITA BASU AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.4372/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.4371/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION(SLP/TP/WP/..)

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:54:37

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE:-[ ALTERNATIVE BENCH ][ IF THE CONSTITUTION BENCH DOES NOT SIT FOR ANY REASON OR THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE THECONSTITUTION BENCH IN THIS COURT ARE OVER, THE FOLLOWING MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BY THIS BENCH ]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

101 Crl.A. No. 118/2010II-C

SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT LTD. AND ANR. PRANAB KUMARMULLICK[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH INSPECTOR OFLEGAL METROLOGY

SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE ARUN MISHRA,HON'BLE VINEET SARAN AND HON'BLE M.R.SHAH, JJ.[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLEJUDGES ]

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 1122/2010IX

INSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

VersusM/S KITCHEN APPLIANCES INDIA LTD..(ELECTRONICDIVISION) THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ANDANR.

SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

101.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 1121/2010IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THEINSPECTOR OF THE STANDARDS OF WEIGHTS ANDMEASURES AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

VersusMOTOROLA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR AND ORS.

S. S. SHROFF

101.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 1118/2010IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THESECRETARY MINISTRY OF FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIESAND CONSUMER PROTECTI AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

VersusTITAN INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH MANAGINGDIRECTOR AND ANR.

KAVEETA WADIA, K J JOHNAND CO

101.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 1120/2010IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THEINSPECTOR OF THE STANDARDS OF WEIGHTS ANDMEASURES AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

VersusBHARTI AIRTEL LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR AND ORS.

ASTHA TYAGI[R-1]

101.5

ConnectedC.A. No. 7874/2015III

LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1],

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

101.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 59/2009XI-A

AMCO BATTERIES LTD. RAMESH BABU M. R.[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. C. K. SASI[R-1]

101.7

ConnectedC.A. No. 1123/2010IX

VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusINSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

101.8

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 40/2011XVI-A

EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

101.9

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 45/2011XVI-A

M/S. EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, V. N.

RAGHUPATHY

101.10

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 46/2011XVI-A

M/S. EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusINSPECTOR OF LEGA METROLOGY V. N. RAGHUPATHY

101.11

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 47/2011XVI-A

M/S. EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, V. N.

RAGHUPATHY

101.12

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 84/2011XVI-A

M/S. EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusINSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY . AND ORS.

101.13

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 115/2011XVI-A

EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

101.14

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 67/2012XVI-A

M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.

101.15

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 67/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH ASSISTANTMANAGER SF SALES MAR MUZZAMMAL ZULFAQARKHAN

E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FOOD CIVILSUPPLIES (DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIESTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

A. N. ARORA, SUSHMA SURI

101.16

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 68/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

101.17

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 69/2014XVI-A

M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. THROUGH ITSSECRETARY

SUSHMA SURI

101.18

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 66/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI

101.19

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 71/2014XVI-A

EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

101.20

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 70/2014XVI-A

M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusSTATE OF A.P. DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL METROLOGY(WEIGHTS AND MEASURES)

SUSHMA SURI

101.21

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 65/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

101.22

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 72/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

101.23

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 73/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

101.24

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 74/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, BINA

MADHAVAN, [R-2], [R-3]

101.25

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 81/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, B. S.

BANTHIA

101.26

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 79/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRSFOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION THROUGH SECRETARYAND ORS.

SUSHMA SURI

101.27

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 78/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

101.28

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 75/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI[R-1], NISHE

RAJEN SHONKER[R-3], [R-4]

101.29

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 76/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusINSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY ASHA GOPALAN NAIR, [R-2],

[R-3]

101.30

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 82/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

101.31

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 77/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD . E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ORISSA SANJEEB PANIGRAHI[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], SUSHMASURI[R-5]

101.32

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 80/2014XVI-A

M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRFOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS.

SUSHMA SURI

101.33

ConnectedT.C.(Crl.) No. 1/2015XVI-A

MUKUL KANDWAL

VersusB.ROUL

101.34

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 5902/2018II-C

M/S KANDUKURI GARMENTS AND ORS. GOPAL JHA

VersusTHE INSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]FOR ADMISSION

102 C.A. No. 877/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP.. J S WAD AND CO

VersusHARAKCHAND MISIRIMAL SOLANKI . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR,

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEEPART-HEARD BY HON'BLE ARUN MISHRA,HON'BLE VINEET SARAN AND HON'BLE M.R.SHAH, JJ. I.A.NO.3/2014 IN C.A.NO.877/2014 TOGO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGESIA No. 3/2014 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER

102.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 881/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. J S WAD AND CO

VersusAJAY ARUN SHIRODKAR ASHA GOPALAN NAIR,

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEEFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA3/2014IA No. 3/2014 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER

102.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 878/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO

VersusABHAY PRIYHVIRAJ BOTHRA . AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE,

ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA4/2014IA No. 4/2014 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER

102.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 883/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO

VersusSURYAKUMAR SHANKAR NIRGUDKAR . AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE,

ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA3/2014IA No. 3/2014 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER

102.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 885/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. J S WAD AND CO

VersusPANNALAL KUNKAD CHARITY SANSTHA . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA3/2014IA No. 3/2014 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER

102.5

ConnectedC.A. No. 880/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO

VersusGULABAI MOTILAL GADIA . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA3/2014IA No. 3/2014 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER

102.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 882/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. J S WAD AND CO

VersusPADAMNAGAR CONSTRUCTIONS P.LTD.. AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA, ASHA

GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA6/2014IA No. 6/2014 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER

102.7

ConnectedC.A. No. 884/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO

VersusM/S.GOLDEN ERECTORS . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA3/2014IA No. 3/2014 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER

103 C.A. No. 11584/2016XIV-A

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. N. ANNAPOORANI[P-1]

VersusM/S. APPLIED ELECTRONICS PUNEET SINGH BINDRA[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ][REMAIN IN THE LIST ]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:54:50

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

104 ORGNL.SUIT No.6/1996XVII-A

THE STATE OF HARYANA DEPARTMENT OFIRRIGATION THE SECRETARY

ANISH KUMAR GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA,

MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-3]D. K. DEVESH[INT][GR]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

Criminal Matters - Matters relating to capital punishment

105 R.P.(Crl.) No.1139-1140/2000 InCrl.A. No. 25-26/2000II-A

NARAYAN CHETANRAM CHAUDHARY AND ANR. SHADAN FARASAT[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ANUSHREE PRASHITKAPADIA[IMPL]RAJAT JOSEPH[INT]

IN Crl.A. No. - 26/2000, IN Crl.A. No. - 25/2000,[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]IA No. 5242/2016 - Appln. for re-opening ofReview PetitionIA No. 111489/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 58516/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 5245/2016 - IA for c/d in filing Appln. forre-opening of RPIA No. 58515/2019 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 130652/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 111488/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

IA No. 157334/2018 - RELEASE OF THEPETITIONER

106 Crl.A. No. 776/2012II-A

ASHRAT @ ARSHAD SHAFIQ AHMAD ANSARI FARRUKH RASHEED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES]DEATH CASE

106.1

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 796-797/2012II-A

MOHD.HASAN MOHD.@ SHAIKH@HASANBATERIWALA AND ANR.

FARRUKH RASHEED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

106.2

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 777-778/2012II-A

FEHMIDA SNEHASISHMUKHERJEE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

107 SLP(C) No. 15482/2016XIV

KHUNJAMAYUM BIMOTI DEVI PRATIK R. BOMBARDE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], TATINIBASU[R-4], [R-5]PURUSHOTTAM SHARMATRIPATHI[IMPL], DIVAKARKUMAR[IMPL]M.P. PARTHIBAN[INT]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]IANo.95243/2017-impleading party and IANo.95245/2017-APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IANo.95249/2017-impleading party and IANo.95251/2017-APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS[As per order dated10.09.2018 the matter be not to deleted from thedate already notified for listing]IA No. 95245/2017 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 95251/2017 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 95243/2017 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 141189/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 95249/2017 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

107.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15589/2016XIV

LEIMAPOKPAM ANANDI DEVI AND ORS. PRATIK R. BOMBARDE[P-1],[P-2], ANISH R. SHAH[P-3],APARNA BHAT[P-4], [P-5]

Versus

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1],[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], TATINIBASU[R-5], KUMARMIHIR[R-11], RAJKUMARIBANJU[R-56], [R-119], D.ABHINAV RAO[R-15], [R-21],[R-36],a [R-51], [R-53], [R-65],[R-87], [R-89], [R-94], [R-95],[R-96], [R-103], [R-104],[R-105], [R-107], [R-111],[R-115]

107.2

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18133/2016XIV

HEISNAM SURESH SINGH AND ORS. PRATIK R. BOMBARDE[P-1],[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], TATINIBASU[R-5], RAJKUMARIBANJU[R-7], [R-417], [R-617],D. ABHINAV RAO[R-8],[R-15], [R-51], [R-94],a [R-95], [R-96]

107.3

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18136/2016XIV

LOUREMBAM SURCHAND SINGH AND ORS. PRATIK R. BOMBARDE[P-1],[P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], TATINIBASU[R-5], D. ABHINAVRAO[R-15], [R-104], [R-105],[R-106], [R-107], [R-111]

107.4

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18128/2016XIV

TOURANGBAM BABITA DEVI PRATIK R. BOMBARDE

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1],

[R-2]

107.5

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 817/2016X

KHOIROM SANGITA DEVI AND ORS. APARNA BHAT[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF MANIPUR . AND ORS.

107.6

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 824/2016X

MAIBAM JEEVANLATA DEVI SOMIRAN SHARMA

VersusSTATE OF MANIPUR THROUGH ITS CHIEFSECRETARY

107.7

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1017/2016X

CH. SUNITA DEVI ROLL NO. 588 AND 646 AND ORS. F. I. CHOUDHURY

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR THROUGH THE CHIEFSECRETARY AND ORS.

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

107.8

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 9/2017X

THOKCHOM DINESH SINGH (ROLL NO. 11588) ANDORS.

F. I. CHOUDHURY

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR CHIEF SECRETARY ANDORS.

107.9

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 22/2017X

LAISHRAM RANIBALA DEVI RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR GOVT. OF MANIPUR

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:55:03

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

108 SLP(C) No.20214-20216/2011XII

T. VALSAN (D) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. AND ORS. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusK.KANAGARAJ AND ORS. ETC.ETC. V. G. PRAGASAM, S. R. SETIA[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:55:09

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Matters relating to specific performance of contract

109 C.A. No. 2364/2011IV-A

PARVATHAMMA AND ORS. NULI & NULI[P-1], [P-2.4],[P-2.3], [P-2.2], [P-2.1], [P-3],[P-4.4], [P-4.3], [P-4.2],[P-4.1], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7],[P-8]

VersusH. THIMMAPPA (D) BY LRS. LALITA KAUSHIK

Company Law, Mrtp, Trai, Sebi, Idrai & Rbi - Matters pertaining to TRAI / SEBI / IDRAIand RBI including Appeals U/S 18 of TRAI Act, Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and 2003,Electricity Supply Act, 1948 and Electricity Reforms Commission Act, 1998 - Matters

pertaining to TRAI / SEBI / IDRAI and RBI including Appeals U/S 18 of TRAI Act

110 C.A. No.5298-5299/2008XVII

M/S.INDRAPRASTHA POWER GEN.CO.LTD. K. V. MOHAN

VersusDELHI ELECT.REGU.COMM.. AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH

KUMAR, RAKESH K.SHARMA, RAJ KUMARMEHTA

110.1

ConnectedC.A. No.5300-5301/2008XVII

M/S.PRAGATI POWER CORP.LTD.THR.DIR. K. V. MOHAN

VersusDELHI ELECT.REGU.COMMISSION RAKESH K. SHARMA, RAJ

KUMAR MEHTA,PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Matters challenging the acquisitionproceedings

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

111 C.A. No.4304-4350/2016IV-A

G.BASAVARAJ . AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1],

(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[R-2],[R-3], P. V.YOGESWARAN[R-4]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:55:15

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 33: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Company Law, Mrtp, Trai, Sebi, Idrai & Rbi - Matters pertaining to TRAI / SEBI / IDRAIand RBI including Appeals U/S 18 of TRAI Act, Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and 2003,Electricity Supply Act, 1948 and Electricity Reforms Commission Act, 1998 - Matters

pertaining to TRAI / SEBI / IDRAI and RBI including Appeals U/S 18 of TRAI Act

112 C.A. No.1927-1928/2008XVII

M.P.POORVA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITARAN CO.LTD ASHIESH KUMAR

VersusUNIVERSAL CABLES LTD. AND ORS. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH

112.1

ConnectedC.A. No.3556-3558/2008XVII

M.P.ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMN. SHARMILA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S SATNA CEMENT WORKS . AND ORS. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH

Ordinary Civil Matters - Matters relating to Electricity Dispute(connection/disconnectionetc)

113 C.A. No. 3180/2009IV

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. ANURAG PANDEY[P-1]

VersusM/S MEHNDI MACS TRADE PVT. LTD AND ANR. SURUCHII AGGARWAL[R-1],

DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-2]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:55:23

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 34: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Company Law, Mrtp, Trai, Sebi, Idrai & Rbi - Matters filed against the orders of MRTPCommission /Competition Commission.

114 C.A. No.6355-6369/2009IX

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.ETC. SACHIN PATIL[P-1]

VersusBHARTI INFRATEL LTD.& ORS.ETC.ETC E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1],

VISHWAJIT SINGH[R-1],RISHI JAIN[R-1], PUNITDUTT TYAGI[R-1], ANAGHAS. DESAI[R-1], PAREKH &CO.[R-1]

Indirect Taxes Matters - Appeals u/s 35 L of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

115 C.A. No. 5862/2008XVII-A

M/S. BHAGIRATH COACH AND METAL FABRICATORSPVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

VIKAS SINGH JANGRA[P-1]

VersusCOMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE,INDORE

115.1

ConnectedC.A. No.10504-10506/2017XVII-A

AUDI AUTOMOBILES AND ORS. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ANDSERVICE TAX INDORE

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

IA No.67619/2017-EX-PARTE STAY and IANo.3035/2018-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSIA No. 67619/2017 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 3035/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:55:30

Page 35: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 36: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- No request for adjournment will be granted in any of the matter(s) listed for hearing.NOTE:-[ THREE JUDGES BENCH MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP FIRST ]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

101 C.A. No.20825-20826/2017III

ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR RAVINDRA KESHAVRAOADSURE

VersusKAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL AND ORS. SHASHIBHUSHAN P.

ADGAONKAR[CAVEAT]VIKAS UPADHYAY[INT]

[ PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE ROHINTON FALINARIMAN , HON'BLE S. RAVINDRA BHAT ANDHON'BLE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, JJ. ] [ TO GOBEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ][AS FIRST ITEM ]IA No. 19047/2018 - VACATING STAY

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 2407/2018III

VIJAY GAUTAM TALUKDAR

VersusARJUN AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO

ADSURE[R-1]

101.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 3696/2018III

KAILASH KISHANRAO GORANTYAL SHASHIBHUSHAN P.ADGAONKAR

VersusARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO

ADSURE[R-1]Relief : declaration of nomination papers asinvalid

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:56:36

Page 37: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 38: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- No request for adjournment will be granted in any of the matter(s) listed for hearing.REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

102 W.P.(C) No. 993/2017X

JUSTICE M. VIJAYARAGHAVAN B. BALAJI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR

MARORIA[R-1], ANANDHKANNAN N.[R-5]AVIRAL SAXENA[IMPL]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES][REMAIN ON BOARD ]IA No. 136171/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

102.1

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1048/2017X

JUSTICE MALAI SUBRAMANIAN B. BALAJI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR

MARORIA[R-1], M. YOGESHKANNA[R-4], ANANDHKANNAN N.[R-5]

102.2

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 548/2018X

ELAVARASI VEERARAGHAVAN B. BALAJI

VersusUNION OF INDIA SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIAMINISTRY OF LAW JUSTICE AND COMPANY AFFAIRSAND ORS.

ANANDH KANNAN N.[R-6]

102.3

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 911/2018X

JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR MUKHERJEE (RETIRED) SHUVODEEP ROY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR

SHARMA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION

Page 39: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

IA No. 18577/2020 - ADDITION / DELETION /MODIFICATION PARTIESIA No. 107836/2018 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 107837/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

102.4

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 86/2019X

JUSTICE SURENDRA KUMAR (RETD.) ANISHA UPADHYAY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-2]IA No. 7729/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

102.5

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7246/2019IV-B

UNION OF INDIA MINISTY OF LAW JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusJUSTICE (RETD.) RAJ RAHUL GARG (RAJ RANI JAIN)AND ORS.

DIVYAKANT LAHOTI[R-1], K.ENATOLI SEMA[R-2], [R-3],ANIL KATIYAR[R-4]

I.A. NO. 163293 (APPLICATION FOR DETAGGING) TO BE LISTED BEFORE HON'BLE COURT.IA No. 163293/2019 - APPLICATION FORTAGGING/DETAGGING

102.6

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 244/2019X

JUSTICE SHARDA AGGARWAL (RETD.) PRITHA SRIKUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

102.7

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1542/2019X

JUSTICE HET SINGH YADAV (RETD.) ANKUR YADAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:56:43

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 40: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- No request for adjournment will be granted in any of the matter(s) listed for hearing.REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

103 C.A. No. 2562/2006XVI

M/S. CENTROTRADE MINERALS AND METALS INC. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusHINDUSTAN COPPER LTD. NANDINI SEN

MUKHERJEE[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDEGS]

103.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 2564/2006XVI

HINDUSTAN COPPER LTD. S. S. JAUHAR

VersusM/S. CENTROTRADE MINERALS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

104 C.A. No. 2525/2018XI-A

CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, C.P.T. V. K. MONGA

VersusM/S AREBEE STAR MARITIME AGEN.PVT.L ARVIND KUMAR

SHARMA[R-2], ANKURKASHYAP[R-6]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

104.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 2526/2018XI-A

CHAIRMAN COCHIN PORT TRUST AND ANR. V. K. MONGA[P-1]

VersusM/S APL(INDIA) P.LTD.. AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA[R-1][CAVEAT],

ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2], [R-3], M. P.VINOD[R-14]

104.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 2527/2018XI-A

CHAIRMAN, COCHIN PORT TRUST . AND ANR. V. K. MONGA

Versus

Page 41: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

SEAHORSE SHIP AGENCIES PVT.LTD. . AND ORS. M. T. GEORGE, ARVINDKUMAR SHARMA[R-2], [R-3]

104.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 2530/2018XI-A

CHAIRMAN, COCHIN PORT TRUST . AND ANR. V. K. MONGA[P-1]

VersusM/S. CONTFREIGHT SHIPPING AG.IND.P.LT ANDORS.

VIKAS MEHTA[R-1][CAVEAT],B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2]

FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA1/2013IA No. 1/2013 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTION

104.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 2529/2018XI-A

BOARD OF TRUSTEES COCHIN PORT.TRUST. ANDANR.

V. K. MONGA[P-1]

VersusM/S.MARINE CONTAINER SER.(SOUTH)P.L. AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA[R-1][CAVEAT],

ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2], [R-3], M. P.VINOD[R-5]

104.5

ConnectedC.A. No. 2528/2018XI-A

CHAIRMAN, COCHIN PORT TRUST . AND ANR. V. K. MONGA

VersusM/S. A.P. INDUSTRIES . AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR

SHARMA[R-10], [R-11]

104.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 2531/2018XI-A

CHAIRMAN, COCHIN PORT TRUST . AND ANR. V. K. MONGA[P-1]

VersusM/S.GREENWAYS SHIPNG.AGS.PVT.LTD.. AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-1],

ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2], [R-3], M. P.VINOD[R-5]

104.7

ConnectedC.A. No. 2532/2018XI-A

CHAIRMAN, COCHIN PORT TRUST AND ANR. V. K. MONGA[P-1]

VersusM/S. MARINE CONTAINER SERVICE (SOUTH) PVT.LTD. AND ORS.

VIKAS MEHTA[R-1][CAVEAT],ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-1], [R-3], M. P.VINOD[R-5]

104.8

ConnectedC.A. No. 2533/2018XI-A

CHAIRMAN, COCHIN PORT TRUST AND ANR. V. K. MONGA[P-1]

VersusM/S.CONTFREIGHT SHIPPING AGENCY INDIAPRIVATE LTD. AND ORS.

VIKAS MEHTA[R-1][CAVEAT],ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2], [R-3]

FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA1/2013IA No. 1/2013 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTION

104.9

ConnectedC.A. No. 2534/2018XI-A

BOARD OF TRUSTEES COCHIN PORT TRUST ANDANR.

V. K. MONGA

Page 42: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

VersusM/S. P AND O NEDLLOYD (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ANDORS.

O. P. GAGGAR, ARVINDKUMAR SHARMA, [R-2], [R-3]

104.10

ConnectedC.A. No. 2535/2018XI-A

CHAIRMAN, COCHIN PORT TRUST . AND ANR. V. K. MONGA

VersusM/S.P AND O NEDLLLOYD (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ANDORS.

VIKAS MEHTA[CAVEAT],ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2], [R-3], M. P.VINOD[R-10]

FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA1/2013IA No. 1/2013 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTION

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

105 SLP(C) No. 2851/2015IV-A

ANUROG MODI PYOLI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR

MARORIA[R-1], HARSHPARASHAR[R-1]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:56:50

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 43: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- No request for adjournment will be granted in any of the matter(s) listed for hearing.REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Direct Taxes Matter - Other matters under Income Tax act, 1961

106 C.A. No. 12183/2016X

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX -II NEW DELHI ANDANR.

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO. LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAI

107 C.A. No. 12044/2016XIV-A

SHIV RAJ GUPTA KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI IV ANIL KATIYARIA No. 156435/2019 - MODIFICATION OF COURTORDER

Appeal Against Orders Of Statutory Bodies - Bar Council of India

108 C.A. No.14083-14084/2015XVII

MR. LAXMAN BAPPAJI NAIK THROUGH POA MR.KISHOR LAXMAN NAIK

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

VersusRANJEET @ RANU YADAV DOKH AND ANR. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[R-1]appellant in person in the matterIA No. 175388/2019 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTIONIA No. 194202/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.

108.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 725/2016XVII

RANJIT @ RANU YADAV DOKHE . AND ANR. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1]

VersusLAXMAN BAPPAJI NAIK SHIV SAGAR TIWARI[R-1],

AMOL B. KARANDE[R-1]FOR DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD ONIA 151385/2019FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA151386/2019

Page 44: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

IA No. 151385/2019 - DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATEON RECORDIA No. 151386/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:57:23

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 45: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- No request for adjournment will be granted in any of the matter(s) listed for hearing.REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Appeals u/s 10 of Special Courts (Trial of offences relating toTransactions in Securities) Act, 1992

109 C.A. No. 2672/2009XVII

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDORS.

B. V. BALARAM DAS, KAMINIJAISWAL, E. C. AGRAWALA,ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 9338/2010XVII

MRS JYOTI HARSHAD MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1]

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA ANIL SHRIVASTAV, [R-1],

ARVIND KUMARTEWARI[R-2], MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-3]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2010FOR ON IA 108905/2013IA No. 2/2010 - STAY APPLICATION

109.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 9339/2010XVII

JYOTI HARSHAD MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1]

VersusSTANDARD CHARTERED BANK (FORMERLY KNOWNAS ANZ GRINDLAYS BANK)

B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON,[R-1], E. C. AGRAWALA[R-2],ARVIND KUMARTEWARI[R-3], ANILKATIYAR[R-4]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2010FOR ON IA 3/2014IA No. 2/2010 - STAY APPLICATION

109.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 9342/2010XVII

JYOTI HARSHAD MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1]

Versus

Page 46: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

S.B.I . AND ORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV, [R-1], E.C. AGRAWALA[R-2], ARVINDKUMAR TEWARI[R-3], B. V.BALARAM DAS[R-4]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2010FOR ON IA 3/2014IA No. 2/2010 - STAY APPLICATION

109.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 3285/2011XVII

JYOTI HARSHAD MEHTA (D) TH:LRS. KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1]

VersusSBI CAPITAL MARKETS LTD . AND ORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-1],

ARVIND KUMARTEWARI[R-2], MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-3]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2011FOR ON IA 108857/2013IA No. 3/2011 - STAY APPLICATION

109.5

ConnectedC.A. No. 3284/2011XVII

JYOTI HARSHAD MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1]

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA . AND ORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-2][PR],

[R-2], ARVIND KUMARTEWARI[R-3][PR], [R-3], B. V.BALARAM DAS[R-4]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2011FOR ON IA 108882/2013IA No. 3/2011 - STAY APPLICATION

109.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 3286/2011XVII

JYOTI HARSHAD MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1]

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA . AND ORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-1],

RAJIV NANDA[R-2], ARVINDKUMAR TEWARI[R-3], B. V.BALARAM DAS[R-4], ARVINDKUMAR SHARMA[R-5]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2011FOR ON IA 108885/2013IA No. 3/2011 - STAY APPLICATION

109.7

ConnectedC.A. No. 2579/2011XVII

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (FORMERLY KNOWNAS ANZ GRINDLAYS BANK LTD. AND LATERSTANDARD CHARTERED GRIN

B. VIJAYALAKSHMIMENON[P-1]

VersusTHE CUSTODIAN ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI,

[R-1], ANILSHRIVASTAV[R-3][PR], JYOTIMENDIRATTA[R-28], KAMINIJAISWAL[R-4][PR], [R-9][PR]

FOR VACATING STAY ON IA 4/2011FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2011FOR ON IA 5/2014IA No. 3/2011 - STAY APPLICATIONIA No. 4/2011 - VACATING STAY

109.8

ConnectedC.A. No. 2580/2011XVII

JYOTI H MEHTA .LEGAL HEIR OF LATE HARSHAD SMEHTA AND ORS.

KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1]

Page 47: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

VersusCUSTODIAN . AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR

TEWARI[R-1], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-2], ANILSHRIVASTAV[R-4], JYOTIMENDIRATTA[R-5], ARVINDKUMAR SHARMA[R-6]

FOR ON IA 4/2011FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2011FOR ON IA 91662/2011IA No. 3/2011 - STAY APPLICATION

109.9

ConnectedC.A. No. 8437/2011XVII

RASILA S MEHTA . AND ANR. KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusCUSTODIAN . AND ANR. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON,

ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI,ANIL SHRIVASTAV, ANILKATIYAR

andFOR ON IA 94550/2011FOR ON IA 3/2011FOR ON IA 7/2012FOR ON IA 5/2012FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA180347/2019IA No. 180347/2019 - EARLY HEARINGAPPLICATION

109.10

ConnectedC.A. No. 2563/2012XVII

RASILA S MEHTA AND ANR. KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusTHE CUSTODIAN AND ANR. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON,

ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI,ANIL SHRIVASTAV, ANILKATIYAR

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2012FOR ON IA 4/2012FOR ON IA 6/2012FOR ON IA 7/2012IA No. 2/2012 - STAY APPLICATION

109.11

ConnectedC.A. No. 6101/2013XVII

JYOTI H MEHTA AND ORS. KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusCUSTODIAN AND ANR. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN,

ARVIND KUMARTEWARI[CAVEAT]

109.12

ConnectedC.A. No. 799/2014XVII

RASILA S MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusCUSTODIAN AND ORS. RAMENDRA MOHAN

PATNAIK, ARVIND KUMARTEWARI

109.13

ConnectedC.A. No. 9880/2016XVII

RASILA S. MEHTA AND ANR. KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1]

Page 48: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 4

VersusCUSTODIAN AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR

TEWARI[R-1], MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-4]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL ON IA 1/2016FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ONIA 2/2016IA No. 1/2016 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING APPEALIA No. 2/2016 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

110 C.A. No. 5145/2016III

AVITEL POST STUDIOZ LIMITED AND ORS. DIKSHA RAI[P-1]

VersusHSBC PI HOLDING (MAURITIUS) LIMITED LIZ MATHEW, [R-1]

110.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 5158/2016III

HSBC PI HOLDINGS (MAURITIUS) LTD LIZ MATHEW[P-1]

VersusAVITEL POST STUDIOZ LTD. AND ORS. DIKSHA RAI[R-1]IA No. 19849/2020 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING THE SPARE COPIESIA No. 152868/2019 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF

110.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 5147/2016III

DECCAN PAPER MILLS CO. LTD. PRABHA SWAMI

VersusREGENCY MAHAVIR PROPERTIES . AND ORS. ABHA R. SHARMA

110.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 9820/2016IV

RAVINDRA SAVLA GAUTAM AWASTHI

VersusAVITEL POST STUDIOZ LTD. . AND ORS. DIKSHA RAI[CAVEAT]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:57:45

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 49: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 5

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Recruitment/Transfer/Compassionate Appointment

101 C.A. No. 2940/2010III-A

V.K.KAPOOR SHEKHAR KUMAR[P-1]

VersusVISITOR SANJAY GANDHI POST GRADUATEINSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND ORS.

SOMIRAN SHARMA[R-1],[R-3], ANKIT GOEL[R-4],JITENDRA KUMAR[R-1], [R-5]

[ HIGHER UPON THE BOARD ]

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

102 C.A. No. 6216/2012XII

SUPER DIAMOND TOOLS AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYAL

VersusK.MOHAN RAO P. I. JOSE

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

103 C.A. No.11161-11164/2013XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusM/S SELECT IMPEX LTD. (FORMERLY SELECTIMPEX (P) LTD.) AND ORS.

RAVINDRA KESHAVRAOADSURE[CAVEAT]

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Matters relating to urban land ceiling

104 C.A. No. 18818/2017III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA

VersusRASHID MD. SHAHID ANWAR[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:57:37

Page 50: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 51: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 5

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Others

105 C.A. No. 4587/2009III-A

RAM NARAIN (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. T. N. SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1],

[R-2], LALITA KAUSHIK[R-10],[R-12], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16],[R-17], [R-19], [R-20], [R-21],[R-22], [R-23], [R-24], [R-25],a [R-27], [R-29], [R-30], [R-31],[R-32], [R-34], [R-36], [R-38],[R-39], [R-40]

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

106 C.A. No. 10198/2010XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusP.KRISHNA PILLAI . AND ORS. USHA NANDINI. V, [R-2],

[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

Service Matters - Removal/Dismissal/Termination from service or other major penalties

107 C.A. No. 6311/2010IX

VITTHALGHANSHYAM PAWAR ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSATARA ZILLA PARISHAD AT SATARA THROUGH ITSCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS.

VISHWAJIT SINGH[R-1],SACHIN PATIL[R-3]

Service Matters - Promotion

108 C.A. No. 6821/2009XI-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR

VersusC.K.KARUNAKARAN

Page 52: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 5

Criminal Matters - Appeal under Section 2 of the Supreme Court enlargement ofjurisdiction Act

109 Crl.A. No. 603/2012II-B

FATTA . AND ORS. SATYENDRA KUMAR[P-3],ABHIMANYU TEWARI[P-4]

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR

VISEN[R-1][GR]REF: R.P DATED 04.2.2020- LIST THE MATTERALONG WITH AN APPLICATION ON 25.02.2020.IA No. 36562/2019 - GRANT OF BAILIA No. 33482/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

Criminal Matters - Matters relating to sexual harassment, kidnapping & abduction

110 Crl.A. No. 1367/2015II-B

JACOB STEPHEN @ STEPHENJI ROMY CHACKO

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASHIA No. 106813/2019 - EXTENSION OF BAIL

110.1

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1368/2015II-B

JOSE T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]IA No. 6890/2017 - GRANT OF BAIL

110.2

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1370/2015II-B

ASHRAF T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH

110.3

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1369/2015II-B

RAJENDRAN NAIR @ RAJAN T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

110.4

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1371/2015II-B

BABU MATHEW T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

110.5

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1372/2015II-B

VARGHESE T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

110.6

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1374-1377/2015II-B

USHA AND ORS. VENKITA SUBRAMONIAMT.R[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

Page 53: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 5

FOR [I/A FOR BAIL] ON IA 92621/2018

110.7

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1378/2015II-B

K THANKAPPAN ZULFIKER ALI P. S[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

110.8

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1373/2015II-B

ALIYAR @ ALI LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 127580/2019IA No. 127580/2019 - GRANT OF BAIL

110.9

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1383/2015II-B

AJI LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH

110.10

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1387-1388/2015II-B

SUNNY GEORGE @ MOTOR SUNNY . AND ANR. K. RAJEEV

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH

110.11

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1379/2015II-B

SHAJI @ JIMMY LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]FOR ON IA 49905/2018

110.12

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1380/2015II-B

DAVOOD LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]FOR ON IA 49910/2018

110.13

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1384/2015II-B

CHERIAN SANJAY JAIN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

110.14

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1386/2015II-B

DHARMARAJAN P. S. SUDHEER[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

110.15

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1381/2015II-B

UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

Page 54: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 5

110.16

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1382/2015II-B

ANIL @ ANI HARSHAD V. HAMEED[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

110.17

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1385/2015II-B

RAJU T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:57:58

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 55: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- FRESH PASS OVER MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BEFORE TAKING UP AFTER NOTICEMATTERS.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Removal/Dismissal/Termination from service or other major penalties

101 C.A. No. 5517/2012IV-A

SYNDICATE BANK RAJIV NANDA

VersusB GANESH PAI MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJAT THE TOP OF THE HEARING MATTERS.

Criminal Matters - Matters relating to sexual harassment, kidnapping & abduction

102 SLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.7862/2017(SCLSC) II-A

SHANKAR MAHTO GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHARMS. VIBHA DATTA MAKHIJA, SR. ADV. A.C.Following Advocates have filed Vakalatnama orAppearance Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee for BombayHigh Court, Mr.P.I.Jose for Gauhati High Court, Mr. Nikhil Goelfor Gujarat High Court, Mr. Arjun Garg forMadhya Pradesh High Court, Ms. Sneha Kalita forManipurHigh Court, ms Parekh and Co. for Patna HighCourt, Mr. Mukul Kumar for Rajasthan HighCourt, Mr. Mukul Kumar for Rajasthan HighCourt, Ms. RachanaSrivastava for Uttarakhand High Court, Ms. UttaraBabbar for Andhra Pradesh High Court andTelangana High Court, Mr. Kunal Chatterji forCalcutta HighCourt, Mr. Sahil Tagotra for J and K High Court,Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki for State Of AndhraPradesh, Mr. V. N. Raghupathy for State OfKarnataka, Mr.G. Prakash for State Of Kerala, Mr. M. YogeshKanna for State Of Tamil Nadu, Mr. SurjenduKumar Das for State of Goa, Ms. KSN and CO. forHigh Court

Page 56: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 6

of Madras, Ms. Astha Sharma for State ofMizoram, Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra for Odisha HighCourt, Mr. K. Enatoli Sema for State of Nagaland,G. Indirafor Andaman and Nicobar Administration, Mr.Ashok Mathur for Punjab and Haryana High Court,Ms. Preetika Dwivedi for Allahabad High Court,Mr.Himanshu Shekhar for Jharkhand High Court, Mr.Jaspreet Gogia for State of Punjab, Mr. NarendraKumar for High Court of Sikkim and for State ofSikkimand Mr. Anil Nag for High Court of HimachalPradesh.IA No. 7862/2017 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 7864/2017 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

102.1

ConnectedDiary No. 32324-2017(SCLSC) II-C

PEELARAM AFTAB ALI KHAN

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARHFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and and IANo.6100/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IA No.6096/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAYIN REFILINGIA No. 6093/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 6096/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTSIA No. 6100/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

102.2

ConnectedDiary No. 36838-2017(SCLSC) II-C

SANT RAM PAO RICHA KAPOOR

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARHFORFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA134596/2017IA No. 134596/2017 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING

102.3

ConnectedDiary No. 40383-2017(SCLSC) II-A

KHEMRAJ JAYABHADUR BORA ALIAS KHEMU PAHLAD SINGH SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]IA No. 141024/2017 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING

102.4

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 3898/2018(SCLSC) II-B

HANSABEN GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]IA No. 338/2020 - GRANT OF BAILIA No. 67289/2019 - GRANT OF BAIL

Page 57: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 6

102.5

ConnectedDiary No. 41799-2017(SCLSC) II-C

PARDESHI PARMANAND GAUR

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARHIA No.21954/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.21956/2018-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.21955/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

102.6

ConnectedDiary No. 42562-2017(SCLSC) II-C

JUGDHAR ALIAS RAM LAL SUSHIL BALWADA

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARHFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and and IANo.1824/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.1825/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 1822/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 1824/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 1825/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

102.7

ConnectedDiary No. 1450-2018(SCLSC) II-A

BHASKAR PROMILA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAIA No. 48277/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 21904/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 21905/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

102.8

ConnectedDiary No. 1857-2018(SCLSC) II-A

UDAY DINKAR PATANGE MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAIA No. 20678/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 1831/2019 - GRANT OF BAIL

102.9

ConnectedDiary No. 3717-2018(SCLSC) II-B

VINOD DEVJIBHAI PANSUL (CHAMAR) HARINDER MOHANSINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA30237/2018IA No. 30237/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

102.10

ConnectedDiary No. 4043-2018(SCLSC) II-C

UTTAM ALIAS SONA RUKHSANACHOUDHURY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]FOR

Page 58: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 6

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA29758/2018FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA29761/2018FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 152151/2018IA No. 29758/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 29761/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 152151/2018 - GRANT OF BAIL

102.11

ConnectedDiary No. 6826-2018(SCLSC) II-A

BABASAHEB SHANKAR WAGHMARE RISHI MALHOTRA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAIA No. 31230/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 31231/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

102.12

ConnectedDiary No. 7014-2018(SCLSC) II-B

SHANKAR @ RINKU ANJANI AIYAGARI

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.29537/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.29541/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

102.13

ConnectedDiary No. 7458-2018(SCLSC) II-B

KULDEEP SINGH MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAIA No.33315/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.33318/2018-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T.

102.14

ConnectedDiary No. 11080-2018(SCLSC) II-C

PANCH RAM ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARHIA No.55954/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.55957/2018-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT andIANo.55956/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

102.15

ConnectedDiary No. 20002-2018(SCLSC) II-A

KAILASH APARNA BHAT

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA87771/2018FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA158500/2018IA No. 87771/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

Page 59: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 6

IA No. 158500/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

102.16

ConnectedDiary No. 22659-2018(SCLSC) II-B

SUNIL @ CHHANIL AND ANR. K. SARADA DEVI

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1]FORFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA88449/2018IA No. 88449/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

102.17

ConnectedDiary No. 29038-2018(SCLSC) II-A

RAM SINGH VIPIN KUMAR JAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.115341/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.115342/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 115341/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 115342/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

102.18

ConnectedDiary No. 29558-2018(SCLSC) II-B

JOY S. MAHENDRAN

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA REP BY ITS CIRCLEINSPECTOR KANJAR P.S.

NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1]

IA No. 114148/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 114150/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 114154/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

Service Matters - Others

103 C.A. No. 19867/2017XV

MALVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ADARSH UPADHYAY

VersusMUKESH KUMAR SHAH TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[ AS FIRST ITEM ]IA No. 115823/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:58:35

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 60: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- FRESH PASS OVER MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BEFORE TAKING UP AFTERNOTICE MATTERS.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Matters relating to specific performance of contract

104 C.A. No. 2187/2011IV-A

MOHAMMED KHALEEL (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. SUKANT VIKRAM[P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7]

VersusJAYAMMA P. R. RAMASESH[R-1]

Service Matters - Others

105 C.A. No. 7327/2016XVI

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. PLR CHAMBERS ANDCO.[P-1]

VersusKALYANI SAMANTA (MONDAL) . AND ORS. RAUF RAHIM[R-1], KUNAL

CHATTERJI[R-2], [R-3][ RETAIN ITS POSITION ][ WITHIN FIRST TENMATTERS ]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:59:35

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 61: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- FRESH PASS OVER MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BEFORE TAKING UP AFTERNOTICE MATTERS.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Religious & Charitable Endowments - Matters relating to management, administrativedisputes of Temples etc. (Priest, Pujari, Mahant)

106 C.A. No. 1720/2010XII

N.CHELLAPPA GURUKKAL S. GOWTHAMAN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU HIGHWAYSDEPARTMENT AND ORS. REP. BY CHIEF ENGINEER

T. HARISH KUMAR, VINODHKANNA B.[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],P. SOMA SUNDARAM, B.BALAJI

Contempt Of Court Matters - Other civil contempt matters

107 C.A. No. 3773/2015XI-A

C.GIRIJA AND ORS. AMIT SHARMA

VersusV.N.MATHUR AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA,

A. RAGHUNATH

107.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 103-107/2016XI-A

CHAIRMAN RAILWAY BOARD AND ORS. ETC. ETC. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusP.K. CHANDRASEKHARA PILLAI AND ANR. ETC. ETC.AND ANR.

VENKITA SUBRAMONIAMT.R, A. RAGHUNATH

FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA80649/2019

Service Matters - Promotion

108 C.A. No.5339-5341/2016XVI-A

NHPC LTD AND ORS. PUNEET TANEJA[P-1]

Versus

Page 62: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 6

ALL INDIA NHPC DIPLOMA ENGINEERS COUNCILAND ANR. ETC.

P. D. SHARMA[R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-9], ASHOKMATHUR, [R-1], [R-11], [R-12]RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[IMPL]

IA No. 114614/2019 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTIONIA No. 114615/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.IA No. 106089/2018 - I A FOR SEEKINGEXEMPTION FROM DEATH CERTIFICATEIA No. 114617/2019 - SETTING ASIDE ANABATEMENT

Service Matters - Pay scales

109 C.A. No. 10800/2016XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[P-1]

VersusSUBHASH CHANDRA AND ORS. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1],

[R-2], BALAJISRINIVASAN[R-1], [R-6]

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 10799/2016XVI

RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY . AND ORS. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[P-1]

VersusSUBHASH CHANDRA . AND ORS. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1],

M. SHOEB ALAM[R-3], [R-4],[R-5], PRAVEENSWARUP[R-6]

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters in which sentence awarded is life imprisonment

110 Crl.A. No. 1537/2018II-B

TAQDIR ROBIN KHOKHAR

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISENlist the appeal itself of hearing in the second weekof February, 2020. (Ref. : R/P dated 20.9.2019)IA No. 139497/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 100779/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 144847/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

110.1

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 9260/2018II-B

ARUN ANISH R. SHAH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA3188/2019IA No. 3188/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

110.2

ConnectedDiary No. 41453-2018II-B

JYOTI PRAKASH ROBIN KHOKHAR

Page 63: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 6

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.174559/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.174561/2018-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENTIA No. 174559/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 174561/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 179967/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

110.3

ConnectedDiary No. 10962-2019II-B

KULDEEP @ BHANDARI ROBIN KHOKHAR

VersusSTATE OF HARYANAIAFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA57835/2019FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 57837/2019IA No. 57835/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 57837/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 12:59:54

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 64: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Others

101 Crl.A. No. 1894/2010II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

VersusMEH RAM AND ORS. SARAD KUMAR

SINGHANIA[R-1][PR],[R-2][PR], [R-4][PR], [R-5][PR]

Indirect Taxes Matters - Import/Export Policy

102 C.A. No.6387-6391/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA ANIL KATIYAR[P-1][GR]

VersusM/S SUN PHARMACEUTICAL IND. LTD. NISHE RAJEN

SHONKER[R-1]

Indirect Taxes Matters - Appeals u/s 130 E of Customs Act, 1962

103 C.A. No. 9358/2011IX

JAMA CORPORATION PVT. LTD. DHARMENDRA KUMARSINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORTS) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:02:27

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 65: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Indirect Taxes Matters - Motor Vehicles Taxation

104 C.A. No.5534-5594/2011XIV-A

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1],[P-2], [P-3]

VersusGOEL BUS SERVICE KULLU AND ORS.[ NOT TO BE TREATED A PART-HEARD MATTER ]SIDDHARTH BHATNAGAR, SENIOR ADVOCATETO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE TO BEASSISTED BY MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN,ADVOCATE.

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

105 C.A. No. 7764/2014IV

RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL AND ORS. PREM MALHOTRA[P-1]

VersusMANJIT KAUR AND ORS. SANJAY JAIN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Matters challenging compensations

106 C.A. No. 6383/2013XIV-A

THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY

VersusFORTUNA AGRO PLANTATION LTD. AND ANR. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL, B.

V. BALARAM DAS[R-2][ TO RETAIN ITS POSITION ]IA No. 7221/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

106.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 6384/2013XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusFORTUNA AGRO PLANTATION LTD. AND ORS. KAUSHIK CHOUDHURY[R-1],

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

Page 66: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

106.2

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20139/2016XIV

FORTUNA AGRO PLANTATIONS LTD. BEINGREPRESENTED BY SHRI AMIT BHAWSINKA S/O SHRIRAJ KUMAR BHAWSINKA(

PAWANSHREEAGRAWAL[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THESECRETARY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIAMINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-2], [R-3]

IA No.80425/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSIA No. 80425/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:03:00

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 67: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Direct Taxes Matter - Other matters under Income Tax act, 1961

107 C.A. No. 14702/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. APAR INDUSTRIES LTD. BINA GUPTA

107.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No.5254-5265/2016IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALL CARGO LOGISTICS LIMITED AND ORS. KARANJAWALA & CO.FOR APPLICATION FOR TAGGING/DETAGGINGON IA 126513/2018IA No. 126513/2018 - APPLICATION FORTAGGING/DETAGGING

107.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 652/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[R-1]Only IA 91312 of 2018 (Application for de-tagging)is to be listed before Hon'ble CourtIA No. 91312/2018 - I/A FOR DETAGGING

107.3

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8091/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S DIVINE INFRACON PVT LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]

107.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 6413/2016XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL- II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

107.5

ConnectedC.A. No. 15956/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Page 68: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

VersusDIVINE INFRACON PVT LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]

107.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 6416/2016XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

107.7

ConnectedC.A. No. 6414/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

107.8

ConnectedC.A. No. 6418/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL - II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

107.9

ConnectedC.A. No. 6417/2016XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL - II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

107.10

ConnectedC.A. No. 6419/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

107.11

ConnectedC.A. No. 5472/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusKUSUM GUPTA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

107.12

ConnectedSLP(C) No.2295-2296/2018XI-A

M/S. ET DEVASSY AND SONS M. P. VINOD

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA1/2016

107.13

ConnectedSLP(C) No.9164-9203/2018XI-A

M/S NEW KERALA INVESTMENTS ETC. ETC M. P. VINOD

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

107.14

ConnectedC.A. No. 15617/2017XIV-A

DAYAWANTI PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Page 69: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

107.15

ConnectedC.A. No. 10267/2017XIV-A

DAYAWANTI THROUGH SMT. SUNITA GUPTA (LEGALHEIR)

PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

107.16

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20559/2017XIV

DAYAWANTI PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

107.17

ConnectedC.A. No. 10266/2017XIV-A

DAYAWANTI PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

107.18

ConnectedC.A. No. 10268/2017XIV-A

DAYAWANTI THROUGH SMT. SUNITA GUPTA (LEGALHEIR)

PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

107.19

ConnectedSLP(C) No.35275-35278/2017XI

M/S. KESARWANI ZARDA BHANDAR, SAHSON,ALLAHABAD

PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)KANPUR

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

107.20

ConnectedSLP(C) No.35259-35260/2017XI

M/S. KESARWANI ZARDA BHANDAR, SAHSON,ALLAHABAD

PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)KANPUR

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

IA No. 125555/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 121523/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 125552/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 125554/2017 - STAY APPLICATION

107.21

ConnectedC.A. No. 5590/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[R-1]Only I.A.No.89750 of 2018(Application fordetagging the Civil Appeal is to be listed beforeHon'ble Court)IA No. 89750/2018 - I/A FOR DETAGGING

107.22

ConnectedC.A. No. 17533/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) 3

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. RANJEETA ROHATGI

Page 70: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.104081/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.104084/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.23

ConnectedC.A. No. 18501/2017XIV-A

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAM AVTAR VERMA SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1]

107.24

ConnectedC.A. No. 18271/2017XIV-A

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAM AVTAR VERMAIA No.110748/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

107.25

ConnectedSLP(C) No.33078-33079/2017XI

M/S. KESARWANI ZARDA BHANDAR PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)KANPUR

ANIL KATIYAR, [R-1]

107.26

ConnectedSLP(C) No.32076-32079/2017XI

M/S. KESARWANI ZARDA BHANDAR PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)KANPUR

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.124110/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.27

ConnectedDiary No. 41198-2017IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDHARAMPAL RAMKUMAR AGRAWALFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.15993/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.15996/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT andIA No.15995/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

107.28

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3169/2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) 1

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. RUCHIKA TREXIM LTD. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1]

107.29

ConnectedC.A. No. 1504/2018XIV-A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE 28

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ARN INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD

GOYAL

Page 71: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

IA No.5689/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

107.30

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21477/2018XIV

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ARN INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LTD. THROUGHSHRI KRISHAN KUMAR, DIRECTOR

107.31

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24100/2018IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDHARAMPAL RAM KUMAR AGRAWALFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.21705/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.21707/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 21707/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.32

ConnectedDiary No. 7057-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) 1 NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMEETA GUTGUTIA PROP. M/S FERNS N PETALSLIST AFTER THE PRONOUNCEMENT OFJUDGMENT IN CA NO. 8900/2012 AND BATCH

107.33

ConnectedC.A. No. 3053/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)1 DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BIHARIJI ISPAT UDYOG PVT. LIMITED

107.34

ConnectedDiary No. 8217-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL 2

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMEETA GUTGUTIA PROP. M/S FERNS N PETALSIA No. 35849/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 35850/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.35

ConnectedC.A. No. 4264/2018XIV-A

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.50342/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.50346/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.36

ConnectedDiary No. 8612-2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMEETA GUTGUTIA

Page 72: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA36339/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA36340/2018IA No. 36339/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 36340/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.37

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9456/2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) 3

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.46650/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.46652/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.38

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21727/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMEETA GUTGUTIAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.55070/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.55071/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTJUDGMENT IN CA NO. 8900/2012 HAS BEENPRONOUNCEDIA No. 55071/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.39

ConnectedDiary No. 14894-2018IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 24 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGOVIND AGARWAL VIKAS MEHTA[R-1], [R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.68197/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.68201/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.40

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16887/2018XIV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) 3 NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

107.41

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16984/2018IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 24 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMANIDEVI AGARWAL VIKAS MEHTA[R-1]

107.42

ConnectedDiary No. 18411-2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL II)NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAM NARAIN JINDALFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.74585/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Page 73: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

107.43

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18262/2018IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 20 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGOVIND AGARWAL VIKAS MEHTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.81644/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.81645/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.44

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18040/2018IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 24 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGOVIND AGARWAL VIKAS MEHTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.85012/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.85013/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.45

ConnectedC.A. No. 6744/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BEST CITY DEVELOPERS INDIA PRIVATELIMITEDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.89950/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

107.46

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19179/2018IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGOVIND AGARWAL VIKAS MEHTA[R-1], [R-1]IA No.93537/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.93540/2018-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.47

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16471/2018XIV

RITU SINGAL AND ORS. KAVITA JHA

VersusKAILASH NATH PANDEY ANIL KATIYAR

107.48

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23329/2018III

PR. COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX VADODARA 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

107.49

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22079/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSUBHASH KHATTAR BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]

107.50

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 25216/2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL 1

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSAMEER GUPTAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.123819/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Page 74: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

107.51

ConnectedC.A. No. 10667/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSAMEER GUPTAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.138104/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

107.52

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27752/2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL 2

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMKR CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD. PRAVEEN SWARUP

107.53

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29835/2018XIV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL3

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusUPPAL CHADHA HI TECH DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.THROUGH DIRECTOR

PRAVEEN SWARUP[CAVEAT]

107.54

ConnectedDiary No. 42779-2018XIV

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BJN HOLDINGS LTD.IA No. 170850/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 170853/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.55

ConnectedDiary No. 42785-2018XIV

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRALCIRCLE 20

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S U.K. PAINTS (OVERSEAS) LTD. MAHUA KALRA[R-1][CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.172357/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.172358/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.56

ConnectedDiary No. 47604-2018XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRALCIRCLE 20

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. J AND N INVESTMENT (ASIA) LTD. MAHUA KALRA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.3401/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.3402/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 3401/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 3402/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.57

ConnectedDiary No. 47892-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) 2

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S K.P. POUCHES PVT. LTD. RUPESH KUMAR[R-1]IA No.4980/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

Page 75: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

IA No. 4980/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

107.58

ConnectedDiary No. 48008-2018XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRALCIRCLE 20

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BJN HOLDINGS (BD) LTD. MAHUA KALRA[CAVEAT]IA No. 15372/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 15375/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.59

ConnectedC.A. No. 3147/2019XIV-A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRALCIRCLE 08

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BJN HOLDINGS (I) LTD. MAHUA KALRA[R-1]

107.60

ConnectedDiary No. 727-2019XIV

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRALCIRCLE 08

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S JENSON AND NICHOLSON (ASIA) LTD. MAHUA KALRA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.15913/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.15915/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.61

ConnectedDiary No. 23931-2019XIV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL3

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusUPPAL CHADHA HI TECH DEVELOPERS (P) LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.120441/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.120442/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 120441/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 120442/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.62

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21324/2019IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CAPRIHANS INDIA LTD. GAGRAT AND CO[CAVEAT]IA No.109801/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

107.63

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21330/2019IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CAPRIHANS INDIA LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR GAGRAT AND CO[CAVEAT]IA No.112481/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

107.64

ConnectedC.A. No. 7600/2019III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL 4

ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 76: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

M/S DHANANJAY INTERNATIONAL LTD. VMZ CHAMBERS[R-1]

107.65

ConnectedC.A. No. 7338/2019XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AGRA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDEVI DASS GARGFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.137218/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

107.66

ConnectedDiary No. 42868-2019XIV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) 1

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GRANITE GATE PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.

107.67

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 487/2020XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GRANITE GATE PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.

107.68

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4109/2020XIV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL1

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SMC POWER GENERATION LTD.IA No.14443/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.14444/2020-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

107.69

ConnectedC.A. No. 721/2020IV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGAHOI FOODS PVT. LTD.IA No.8749/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.8750/2020-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

107.70

ConnectedC.A. No. 1505/2020IV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GAHOI FOODS PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.14528/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

107.71

ConnectedC.A. No. 734/2020IV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GAHOI FOOD PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.8904/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:03:28

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 77: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the
Page 78: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Direct Taxes Matter - Other matters under Income Tax act, 1961

108 C.A. No. 1469/2016XI-A

SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD TRICHUR MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TRICHUR B. V. BALARAM DAS

108.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 1468/2016XI-A

SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

108.2

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18364/2018XI-A

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusTHE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

Direct Taxes Matter - Deductions/exemptions

109 C.A. No. 7751/2012XIV-A

M/S. MAGNUM INTERNATIONAL TRADINGCOMPANY (P) LTD.

ASHWANI KUMAR[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 7752/2012XIV-A

M/S. MAGNUM INTERNATIONAL TRADINGCOMPANY (P) LTD.

ASHWANI KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

109.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 7754/2012XIV-A

M/S. MAGNUM INTERNATIONAL TRADINGCOMPANY (P) LTD.

ASHWANI KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Page 79: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

109.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 7753/2012XIV-A

M/S. MAGNUM INTERNATIONAL TRADINGCOMPANY (P) LTD.

ASHWANI KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:03:53

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 80: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

110 C.A. No. 10215/2011IV-A

SHIVSHANKARA AND ANR. NARENDRA KUMAR[P-1]

VersusH.P.VEDAVYASA CHAR RITESH KUMAR

CHOWDHARY[R-1]IA No. 3/2015 - AMENDMENT OF PLAINTIA No. 4/2015 - PLACING ON RECORDADDITIONAL RECORD

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:04:10

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 81: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Others

101 Crl.A. No. 142-144/2008II-C

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1]

VersusMOHAMMED SAFI AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[R-1],

REVATHY RAGHAVAN[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-6], [R-8],ANZU. K. VARKEY[R-7]

PART HEARD BY HON. DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUDAND HON. AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Others

102 C.A. No.1129-1130/2013III

K.S JORAWARSINHJI GODJI(D) TH HEIRS & LE ANIL SHRIVASTAV[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT . AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3]TOP OF THE BOARD

Service Matters - Reservation in service for SC/ST/OBC

103 C.A. No.2827-2829/2018XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusROHIT NATHAN AND ANR. HARSH PARASHAR[CAVEAT]

SIDDHARTHA JHA[INT],PRATEEK K CHADHA[R-1],[INT], HIMALAWRENCE[INT][PR]

[ TOP OF THE BOARD ]......[RETAIN ITSPOSITION]IA No. 61701/2018 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 54805/2018 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION

Page 82: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 8

IA No. 68095/2018 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 68085/2018 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 68077/2018 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 32104/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 32088/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 32071/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 134295/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

103.1

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 381/2020X

RAJESH KUMAR YADAV DEEPAK GOEL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:05:34

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 83: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Matters Pertaining To Armed Forces & Paramilitary Forces - Matters Pertaining ToArmed Forces & Paramilitary Forces

104 C.A. No. 4410/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusSURESH KUMAR SINGH NEERAJ SHEKHAR[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:05:45

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 84: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Others

105 Crl.A. No. 2178/2009II-B

RAJBIR K. K. MOHAN

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

106 C.A. No. 8313/2009IV-A

KRISHNA KUMARI SAURABH TRIVEDI[P-1]

VersusASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]REMAIN ON BOARD

Service Matters - Recruitment/Transfer/Compassionate Appointment

107 C.A. No. 2857/2011IX

SHRI NASHIK PANCHAVATI PANJARPOL TRUST PRESHIT VILAS SURSHE[P-1]

VersusTHE CHAIRMAN AND ANR. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1],

SACHIN PATIL[R-2]RETAIN ITS POSITION

107.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 2858/2011IX

SHREE NASIK PANCHAVATI PANJARAPOLE TRUSTAND ORS.

PRESHIT VILAS SURSHE[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ANR. SACHIN PATIL[R-1],

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-2]

Criminal Matters - Appeal under Section 2 of the Supreme Court enlargement ofjurisdiction Act

108 Crl.A. No. 1755/2011II-A

HARIBHAU @ BHAUSAHEB DINKAR KHARUSE ANDANR.

K. N. RAI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

Page 85: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 8

HEARING EXPEDITED.

108.1

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 150-151/2013II-A

SUBHASH RAGHUNATH PAWAR K. N. RAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENTSECRETARY

Service Matters - Retiral benefits

109 C.A. No. 1080/2017III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH THEPRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ANR.

ROHIT K. SINGH[P-1], [P-2]

VersusDINESH KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. S. K. VERMA[R-1], [R-2],

[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:05:51

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 86: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Indirect Taxes Matters - Appeals u/s 130 E of Customs Act, 1962

110 C.A. No. 305/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S. EDWARD LIFE SCIENCES(I) PVT.LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

SONAL JAIN[R-1]

IA No. 2/2014 - STAY APPLICATION

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:05:59

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 87: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Removal/Dismissal/Termination from service or other major penalties

101 C.A. No. 9778/2010IV-A

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD. . AND ORS. PAREKH & CO.

VersusANIL PADEGAONKAR PRATIBHA JAINPart Heard by Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan andHon'ble Navin Sinha,JJ.

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 9779/2010IV-A

ANIL PADEGAONKAR PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD.. AND ORS. PAREKH & CO.

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:05:48

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 88: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Removal/Dismissal/Termination from service or other major penalties

102 C.A. No. 5149/2011XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS AND ORS. MADHU SIKRI

VersusSUPRIYA BASU PARTHA SIL

102.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 5148/2011XVI

SUPRIYA BASU PARTHA SIL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MADHU SIKRI, GURMEET

SINGH MAKKER[R-1]

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Others

103 C.A. No.9049-9053/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S K.C.SHARMA AND CO.. AND ORS. NIKILESH

RAMACHANDRAN[R-1]

Religious & Charitable Endowments - Others

104 C.A. No.3964-3965/2009XII

R.M. SUNDARAM @ R.MEENAKSHISUNDARAM V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSRI KAYAROHANASAMY AND NEELAYABHAKSHIAMMAN TEMPLE

T. HARISH KUMAR

Personal Law Matters - Matters relating to partition

105 C.A. No. 1125/2009XI-A

MEENA PAUL AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO[P-1]

Versus

Page 89: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 9

BIYATREES @ CHINNAMMA (DEAD) BY LRS. ANDORS.

P. GEORGE GIRI[R-1.4],[R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1], [R-2],[R-3]

105.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23534/2009XI-A

BIYATREES @ CHINNAMMA . (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

P. GEORGE GIRI[P-1]

VersusC.G.MANNUEL @ KUNJACHAN . (DEAD) THR. LRS.AND ORS.I.A. No. 1 Application for condonation of delay infiling the SLP

Personal Law Matters - Matters relating to Gift

106 C.A. No. 2444/2010XVI

KALAWATI DEVI MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusPRABHAWATI DEVI DEAD THR. LRS. AND ANR. ANDANR.

S. K. VERMA

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:05:55

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 90: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Direct Taxes Matter - Deductions/exemptions

107 C.A. No. 5105/2009XIV-A

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION

PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V, DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

107.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 5106/2009XIV-A

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION

PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI I ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

107.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 5107/2009XIV-A

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION

PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI I

Criminal Matters - Others

108 Crl.A. No. 2103/2010II-B

V.P.SINGH SUDARSHAN RAJAN

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1],

[R-1][ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

108.1

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2104/2010II-B

NITIN SHYAM PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB PREM MALHOTRA, [R-2],

KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1]

108.2

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2105/2010II-B

SARABJIT SINGH JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

Page 91: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 9

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Matters challenging the acquisitionproceedings

109 C.A. No. 550/2016III-A

STATE OF UP THR. SECRETARY AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusPRAHALAD KUMAR AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND

CO.[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-3]

As per Hon'ble Court's Order dated 31.07.2019,List the matters after two weeks.IA No. 4/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 551/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. REVENUE DEPARTMENT THROUGHSECRETARY AND ORS.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1],[P-2], [P-3]

VersusAMAR SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS. SONAL JAIN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],

[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13],[R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-17],[R-19], [R-21], [R-22],a [R-23], [R-24], MOHD.IRSHAD HANIF[R-8], [R-18]

109.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 552/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusGRAM UDYOG SANSTHAN THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANBHAGWAN DAS (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ORS.

MANOJ SWARUP ANDCO.[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-5]

FORFOR ON IA 8/2015FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA9/2015FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA88370/2019FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGSUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 88371/2019FOR SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT ON IA88372/2019FOR APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FORSETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT ON IA88374/2019IA No. 88374/2019 - APPLICATION FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THEAPPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THEABATEMENTIA No. 88370/2019 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTIONIA No. 88371/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.IA No. 9/2015 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 88372/2019 - SETTING ASIDE ANABATEMENT

109.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 553/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

Page 92: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 9

VersusMAHESH CHAND AND ANR. AMIT DAYAL[R-1]

109.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 555/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. REVENUE DEPARTMENT THROUGHSECRETARY AND ORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusM/S BHARAT LIME INDUSTRY AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND

CO.[R-1]

Service Matters - Promotion

110 C.A. No.8214-8215/2016X

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND UTTARAKHAND PEYJAL S.V.E.N.NIGAM MANAGING DIRECTOR

SHIRIN KHAJURIA[P-1]

VersusJAGDISH CHANDRA PANDEY RASHMI

NANDAKUMAR[R-3],ANURAG KISHORE[R-5],GARVESH KABRA[R-6][PR],[R-7][PR], [R-8][PR],[R-9][PR], [R-10][PR],[R-11][PR], [R-12][PR],[R-14][PR]

[ Retain its Position ]IA No. 160413/2018 - STAY APPLICATION

110.1

ConnectedC.A. No.8216-8217/2016X

SUBHASH CHANDRA ANURAG KISHORE

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND SECRETARY ANDORS.

SHIRIN KHAJURIA[R-2],[R-3], GARVESHKABRA[R-16][PR]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:06:08

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 93: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE:-[ THIS BENCH WILL ASSEMBLE AS SOON AS HEARING IN SPECIAL BENCH MATTER LISTED IN CHIEF JUSTICECOURT AT 10.30 A.M. IS OVER ]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Appeal Against Orders Of Statutory Bodies - Appeals and other matters U/Ss 30 and 31of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007

101 C.A. No. 8448/2015XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusUMAKANTA DASHAT THE TOPIA No. 2/2015 - STAY APPLICATION

102 C.A. No. 3586/2017XVII

VIRENDRA SINGH SAMIR ALI KHAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAAT THE TOP

103 Crl.A. No. 216/2016II-B

SHAMSHER SINGH PRAVEEN JAIN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA,

[R-1], , [R-2]AT THE TOP

104 Crl.A. No. 877/2016II-C

EX- MAJOR SANJEEV KUMAR GOSWAMI SANJAY KUMAR DUBEY[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA,

[R-1]AT THE TOP

105 C.A. No. 429/2016XVII

GUARDSMAN SHAM SINGH ARCHANA PATHAKDAVE[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR

SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]AT THE TOP

Page 94: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:06:51

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 95: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

State Excise-Trading In Liquor-Privileges, Licences-distilleries Breweries - State Excise-Trading In Liquor-Privileges, Licencesdistilleries Breweries

106 C.A. No. 279/2012IV-A

DHEERENDRA KUMAR MISHRA V. MAHESHWARI & CO.[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF M.P.. AND ORS. HARSH PARASHAR[R-1],

SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-3]REMAIN ON BOARD

Service Matters - Others

107 C.A. No. 101/2013(SCLSC) III

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

VersusSUDHAKAR SHANKAR SHINDE NIDHI[ REMAIN ON BOARD ]

107.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 103/2013III

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

VersusANIL GUJANAN LIKHITE

Criminal Matters - Others

108 Crl.A. No. 212/2012(SCLSC) II-B

MITESH @ T.V.VAGHELA BALRAJ DEWAN[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

Service Matters - Others

109 C.A. No. 3338/2016III

SINDHUDURG ZILLA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA CHALAKMANDAL, (REGISTERED) THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN/SECRETARY

ANAGHA S. DESAI

Versus

Page 96: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 11

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, ,GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-1]

[ REMAIN ON BOARD ]

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 3337/2016III

SINDHUDURG ZILLA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA CHALAKMANDAL, PANDUR (REGISTERED) THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN/SECRETARY

ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION ANDSPORTS DEPARTMENT AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, , SUNILKUMAR VERMA, DILIPANNASAHEB TAUR,ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

109.2

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2408/2018IX

AZAD EDUCATION SOCIETY MIRAJ PRESIDENT RAHUL JOSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], [R-2],

ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[R-3]DINESH RATTANBHARDWAJ[INT]

ONLY IA No.3894/2019 (FOR INTERVENTION)AND & I.A NO. 3895/2019 (FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O/T) IN SLP (C) NO. 2408/2018 TOBE LISTED FOR ORDERS.IA No. 3895/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 3894/2019 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION

109.3

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29013/2018IX

ANJUMAN ISHAAT E TALEEM TRUST SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. RAHUL JOSHI[R-4]

109.4

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1379/2018X

AL SABAH EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETYAND ORS.

M. SHOEB ALAM

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO

KATNESHWARKAR[R-1],GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-2]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 164702/2018IA No. 164702/2018 - EX-PARTE STAY

109.5

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3972/2020IX

AYESHA EDUCATION AND WELFARE TRUST ANDANR.

BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.IA No.20128/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.20130/2020-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IANo.20126/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION(SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.20134/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING /CURING THE DEFECTS and IA

Page 97: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 11

No.20129/2020-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:07:05

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 98: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Appeal Against Orders Of Statutory Bodies - Bar Council of India

110 C.A. No. 1009/2013XVII

HARMANBHAI UMEDBHAI PATEL RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL

VersusBINDU KUMAR MOHANLAL SHAH ADVOCATE SUMITA RAY[ REMAIN ON BOARD ]IA No. 1/2013 - EX-PARTE STAY

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:07:16

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 99: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Recruitment/Transfer/Compassionate Appointment

101 C.A. No.5181-5187/2018IV-A

KHAIRUNISHA KHAN AND ORS. B. K. SATIJA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF CHHATTISARH . AND ORS. ASWATHI M.K.[R-1],

ANANTHA NARAYANAM.G.[R-1]

PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE SANJAY KISHANKAUL AND HON'BLE K.M. JOSEPH, JJ.

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Others

102 C.A. No. 4382/2017XI-A

RIPON ESTATES LTD. PAREKH & CO.

VersusTHEKKEMARIVEETTIL MADHAVI AMMA (D)THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.

MEERA MATHUR

PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE SANJAY KISHANKAUL AND HON'BLE K.M. JOSEPH ,JJ.

102.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11650/2019XI-A

RIPON ESTATES LTD. (FORMERLY PODDARPLANTATIONS LTD.)

PAREKH & CO.

VersusTHEKKEMARIVEETTIL GOVINDANKUTY NAIR ANDORS.

MEERA MATHUR[R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.75680/2019-ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATIONPARTIES

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:06:57

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 100: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the
Page 101: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Personal Law Matters - Others

103 C.A. No. 2936/2011XVI

BHAGWAN SINGH AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA

VersusDINESH KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. PREM PRAKASHPART-HEARD BY HON'BLE SANJAY KISHANKAUL AND HON'BLE K.M. JOSEPH ,JJ.

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Others

104 C.A. No.3663-3667/2010III-A

RAM MOHAN (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANR. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR, [P-2]

VersusSANT SEWAK AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN, [R-2],

[R-3], [R-4]PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE SANJAY KISHANKAUL AND HON'BLE K.M. JOSEPH,JJ.

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:07:03

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 102: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Promotion

105 C.A. No. 6385/2014XII-A

L. KUMARA SWAMY RAJA C. S. N. MOHAN RAO

VersusC. NARASIMLU AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

Personal Law Matters - Others

106 C.A. No. 8877/2011XVI

ABDUL HAMED . AND ORS. DANISH ZUBAIR KHAN

VersusNABEKA BIBI . AND ANR. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-2][ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

Personal Law Matters - Matters relating to partition

107 C.A. No. 2754/2010XII

KANDASAMY(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. SATYA MITRA GARG

VersusMUTHU GOUNDER (D) THR.LRS. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Others

108 C.A. No. 6389/2017III

M/S LA' BUILDE CORPORATION SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1]

VersusUOI AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2],

[R-4], [R-5], SHIV KUMARSURI[R-3]

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters in which sentence awarded is life imprisonment

Page 103: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 12

109 Crl.A. No. 753/2017II

ARVIND KUMAR @ NEMICHAND . AND ORS. ABHISHEK GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

SUDARSHAN SINGHRAWAT[INT]

IA No. 19876/2016 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION

109.1

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 756/2017II

RAMNARAYAN ANAND MISHRA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 75421/2019IA No. 75421/2019 - GRANT OF BAIL

109.2

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 754-755/2017II

HARLAL SINGH SANJAY JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN HOME DEPARTMENTSECRETARY AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1],ABHISHEK GUPTA[R-2],[R-3], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:07:09

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 104: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Others

110 Crl.A. No. 24-25/2015II-B

GURPAL SINGH TARUN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. JASPREET GOGIA[R-1], AJAY

KUMAR SINGH[R-2]FOR FINAL DISPOSAL

110.1

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 26/2015II-B

SHALINDER SINGH AJAY KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:07:16

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 105: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Recruitment/Transfer/Compassionate Appointment

111 C.A. No.8255-8257/2009XVI

LT.GOVERNER AND OTHERS G. INDIRA[P-1]

VersusSHAJAN T.OOMAN AND OTHERS AND ORS. ABHA JAIN[R-1], MONA K.

RAJVANSHI[R-2], RAUFRAHIM[R-3], [R-4]

As per ROP dated, 12.02.2009, list on 25.2.2020.

111.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 7971/2011XVI

LT GOVERNOR ANDMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDSAND ANR.

G. INDIRA

VersusR.K. DAKUA

111.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 7969/2011XVI

LT GOVERNOR ANDAMAN AND ANR. G. INDIRA

VersusSHAJAN T OOMMEN ABHA JAINFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA10303/2020FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA13947/2020IA No. 13947/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 10303/2020 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

111.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 7970/2011XVI

LT GOVERNOR ADMIN AND ANR. G. INDIRA

VersusVENKAT RAMANA

Page 106: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 12

Criminal Matters - Matters relating to harassment, cruelty to woman for dowry, dowrydeath, eveteasing, domestic violence etc.

112 Crl.A. No. 1499/2015II-C

SHAMEEM BEGUM T. MAHIPAL[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF M P(NOW CHATTISGARH) SUMEER SODHI[R-1]For final hearing

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:07:22

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 107: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Matters Relating To Consumer Protection - Appeals u/s 23 of Consumer Protection Act,1986.

101 C.A. No. 5273/2008XVII-A

HONGKONG ANDSHANGHAI BANKING CORP. LTD.

VersusAWAZ . AND ORS. SHIEL SETHI, H. S.

PARIHAR, CHANCHALKUMAR GANGULI, GAGANGUPTA[P-1], [R-5]

FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 4/2009FOR ON IA 8422/2009FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2009FOR ON IA 13811/2009FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2008FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 5/2017IA No. 1/2008 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 4/2009 - MODIFICATIONIA No. 3/2009 - STAY APPLICATION

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 5294/2008XVII-A

CITIBANK,N.A CHANCHAL KUMARGANGULI

VersusAWAZ . AND ORS. SHIEL SETHI, GAGAN

GUPTA, [R-5], [R-7], BINAGUPTA, H. S. PARIHAR, [R-4]S. S. SHROFF, [INT]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 2/2008FOR ON IA 64103/2008FOR ON IA 8358/2009

101.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 5627/2008XVII-A

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANKING CORP. RAJAN NARAIN

VersusAWAZ . AND ORS. SHIEL SETHI[R-1], H. S.

PARIHAR[R-4], ARUNKUMAR BERIWAL[R-5], [R-8]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2008IA No. 2/2008 - STAY APPLICATION

Page 108: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 13

101.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 5278/2008XVII-A

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ARUN KUMAR BERIWAL

VersusAWAZ . AND ORS. SHIEL SETHI, MANISH K.

BISHNOI, H. S. PARIHAR,CHANCHAL KUMARGANGULI, GAGANGUPTA[P-1], [R-5]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 4/2009FOR ON IA 70679/2008FOR ON IA 8423/2009FOR ON IA 34602/2009

101.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 6679/2008XVII-A

AWAZ . AND ORS. S. RAMAMANI[P-1]

VersusRBI . AND ORS. RAJAN NARAIN[R-1], H. S.

PARIHAR[R-1], GAGANGUPTA[R-1], CHANCHALKUMAR GANGULI[R-1]

FOR ON IA 85989/2008FOR ON IA 110353/2011FOR ON IA 101224/2012

Simple Money & Mortgage Matters Etc. - Mortgage private

102 C.A. No. 4594/2010IX

SHANKAR SAKHARAM KENJALE(D) BY LRS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAOADSURE

VersusNARAYAN KRISHNA GADE . AND ANR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Service Matters - Recruitment/Transfer/Compassionate Appointment

103 C.A. No. 530/2011IV

HARYANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION D. S. CHAUHAN

VersusANU RADHA AND ORS. LALITA KAUSHIK, [R-1]

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Others

104 C.A. No.4611-4612/2016IV

M/S LARA INDUSTRIES(P) LTD. RAHUL GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN, SANJAY

KUMAR VISENHearing expedited vide Hon'ble Court's orderdated 25.04.2016.

Criminal Matters - Others

105 Crl.A. No. 749/2015II

SUDHIR AND ORS. SONAL JAIN[P-1]

Versus

Page 109: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 13

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHARSINGH[R-1]

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters in which sentence awarded is life imprisonment

106 Crl.A. No. 1173/2016II

HARGOVIND AND ORS. RAKESH DAHIYA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1]

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

107 C.A. No. 3736/2018XVI

RASHMI METALIKS LIMITED AND ANR. S. S. SHROFF[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]IA No. 191591/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 190513/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 190505/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 805/2020 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 191595/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

107.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 3737/2018XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. RASHMI METALIKS LTD. AND ANR. S. S. SHROFF[CAVEAT]As per R/p dated 06.04.2018 list for final hearingon 17 July 2018.

107.2

ConnectedC.A. No.3738-3741/2018XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAGADIYA BROTHERS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. T.

MAHIPAL[CAVEAT][CAVEAT],E. C. AGRAWALA[CAVEAT]

As per R/p dated 06.04.2018 list for final hearingon 17 July 2018.

107.3

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27495/2019XVI

S K. SARAWAGI AND COMPANY PVT. LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2],

[R-3], [R-4], [R-5]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.28030/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Matters Relating To Consumer Protection - Appeals u/s 23 of Consumer Protection Act,1986.

Page 110: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 13

108 C.A. No. 5063/2015XVII-A

AKAL ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD. MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE

VersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR. GAURAV SHARMA

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Matters relating to urban land ceiling

109 C.A. No. 7339/2016XVII

AMARENDRA KUMAR SAHAY SARLA CHANDRA

VersusSHANTANU KUMAR CHAUDHARY AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.,

ATUL KUMAR, ANIL K. JHA[ RETAIN ITS POSITION IN WEEKLY LIST ]IA No. 3/2015 - VACATING STAY

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 7340/2016XVII

AMARENDRA KUMAR SAHAY SARLA CHANDRA

VersusSHANTANU KUMAR CHOUDHARY . AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.,

ABHINAV MUKERJIFOR VACATING STAY ON IA 3/2015FOR ON IA 4/2015FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA5/2015IA No. 5/2015 - PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURESIA No. 3/2015 - VACATING STAY

109.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 7341/2016XVII

STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE DEPUTYCOMMISSIONER

ANIL K. JHA

VersusSAVITRI DEVI . AND ORS. SARLA CHANDRA, MANOJ

SWARUP AND CO., ATULKUMAR

109.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 7342/2016XVII

SAVITRI DEVI AND ORS. ATUL KUMAR

VersusSANTANU KUMAR CHAUDHARY . AND ORS. SARLA CHANDRA, MANOJ

SWARUP AND CO., ANIL K.JHA

FORFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA2/2016FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA3/2016IA No. 3/2016 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 2/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES

109.4

ConnectedC.A. No.7296-7297/2016XVII

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. ANIL K. JHA

VersusSANTANU KUMAR CHAUDHARY . AND ORS. SARLA CHANDRA, MANOJ

SWARUP AND CO., ATULKUMAR

Page 111: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 13

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA3/2016FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA5/2016IA No. 5/2016 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.IA No. 3/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES

Matters Relating To Consumer Protection - SLPs relating to Consumer Protection.

110 C.A. No. 3903/2019XVII-A

A.J. MOHAMMED SHAH @ AJ SHANAVAS P. I. JOSE

VersusKERALA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE (KIMS)AND ANR.

T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR,JOGY SCARIA

110.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 3904/2019XVII-A

KERALA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE (KIMS) RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusA.J. MOHAMMED SHAH @ A.J. SHANAVAS AND ANR. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR, P. I.

JOSE

110.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 3905/2019XVII-A

DR. K.R. VIKRAMAN SUREGEON T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

VersusA.J. MOHAMMED SHAH @ A.J. SHANAVAS AND ANR. P. I. JOSE[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:08:33

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 112: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 15

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE:-[ ALTERNATIVE BENCH ][ IF THE CONSTITUTION BENCH DOES NOT SIT FOR ANY REASON OR THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE THECONSTITUTION BENCH IN COURT NO. 3 ARE OVER, THE MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BY THIS BENCH ]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

101 C.A. No. 5049/2009IV-A

SABIR HUSSAIN AND ORS. PRAKASH KUMARSINGH[P-1]

VersusSYED MOHAMMAD HASSAN (DEAD) TH. LRS ANDANR.

PRASHANT KUMAR[LR/S]

Criminal Matters - Others

102 Crl.A. No. 1315/2012II-A

SONI MIAN AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL, [P-2], [P-3],[P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusSHAHID HADI AND ORS. ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1],

GOPAL SINGH[R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5]

103 Crl.A. No. 1390/2010(SCLSC) II

RASHID AHMAD @ RAHEES AHMAD M. P. SHORAWALA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. SHASHANK SHEKHAR

SINGH[R-1], S. K.VERMA[R-2], [R-3], AJAYKUMAR TALESARA[R-4]

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters relating to Drugs and Cosmetics, NDPS Act

104 Crl.A. No. 1372/2010(SCLSC) II-B

SURESH SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1],[P-2], [P-2]

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

Criminal Matters - Others

Page 113: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 15

105 Crl.A. No. 1508/2010II-B

MADHABA CHENDA AND ORS. SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

VersusTHE STATE OF ODISHA SHIBASHISH MISRA

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:08:23

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 114: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 15

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Matters Relating To Consumer Protection - SLPs relating to Consumer Protection.

106 C.A. No.4412-4413/2010XVII-A

M/S. ASSOCIATED ROAD CARRIERS LTD. VIJAY K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusM/S. KAMLENDER KASHYAP AND ORS. ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-1],

SUDARSHAN SINGHRAWAT[R-2]

Criminal Matters - Others

107 Crl.A. No. 1661/2009II-B

GADADHAR CHANDRA RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND

CO.[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:08:31

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 115: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-03-2020COURT NO. : 15

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

108 C.A. No. 6797/2008X

M/S LAXMI CONTINENTAL CONSTRN.COMPANY MUKESH KUMARSHARMA[P-1][PR]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. KAMLENDRA

MISHRA[R-1][GR]

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

109 C.A. No.8885-8886/2012IV-A

KAMLESH PURI DIVYAKANT LAHOTI[P-1]

VersusHARI SINGH AND ORS. PUNEET TANEJA, SURYA

KANT, DHARMENDRAKUMAR SINHA

110 C.A. No. 4949/2009XII

SRI PAMBAN KUMARAGURUPARASWAMY TEMPLE SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

VersusK.SUBRAMANYA MUDLIAR(D) THR.LRS.. AND ORS. R. AYYAM PERUMALIA No. 130079/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

NEW DELHI29-02-2020 13:08:37

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 116: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK … · 2020-02-29 · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the