supporting return to work for people living with pain · living with pain applications of the...
TRANSCRIPT
Supporting Return to
Work for People
Living with Pain
Applications of the principles of interdisciplinary treatment
Pain BC ConferenceOctober 20, 2012
Presenters
� Dr. Erik Baasch, Medical Doctor
� Dr. Matt Graham, Psychologist
� Cat Douglas, Occupational Therapist
� Leigh Fortuna, Physiotherapist
Objectives
� Review acute and chronic pain and return to work approaches with each population
� Challenge clinical decision making around when to recommend a patient in pain stop working
� Discuss factors to consider when a patient in pain is returning to work
Outline
� Introductions
� Case example
� Differences in acute and chronic pain and return to work
� The physician’s role in return to work
� How to develop and implement a gradual return to work plan for someone with pain
� Importance of patient’s belief system in return to work
� Case example
� Panel for questions/discussion
Case Example
� Case #1 discussion (10 minutes)
�Discuss at your tables
Free image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Acute vs. Chronic Pain
when should someone return to work with pain?
� Definition of Pain from IASP:
� An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience
associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.
� Definition from Lorimer Moesley1:
� Pain as a BRAIN OUTPUT
� Neither definition clearly differentiates acute vs.
chronic
Acute Pain
� Generally accepted as pain
due to damage in body tissue.
� Even with acute pain,
pain is an OUTPUT
Chronic Pain
� Generally accepted as pain that persists longer than expected healing time.
� Often becomes
less about the
tissue and more
about a maladaptive
OUTPUT from the
brain.1,2
Image from Explain Pain5
Which is more “Chronic”?
� 57 year old male with:
a) Severe knee osteoarthritis waiting for a knee replacement, continuing to work and golf
b) A lumbar strain 1 month ago at work, DDD, not sleeping, not working, financial stress, mood changes
What would be different about treatment and RTW approach with each situation?
Importance of Return to Work
� The longer a patient is away from work due to injury/pain, the less likely they will return.10
Free image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Keys to supporting RTW with pain
� Know the prognosis
� Understand concept of “pain vs. damage” or “hurt vs. harm”
� Know patient’s functional abilities
� Know job duties� Ensure all parties are clear about what patient is
being asked to do
� Understand pacing and use of active coping skills
The role of the physician in the
process of return to work for a
person in pain.
Free image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Writing the Sick Note
� Reasons for this
�Compassion
�Medical
�Patient Driven
Free image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Terminology used
� Restrictions
� Limitations
� Tolerance
Some Thoughts about Return to
Work
� Return to work as the goal of treatment
� Return to work as part of the treatment
The Importance of Work and
Approaches for Building
Understanding and Confidence for
the Process
Guiding the Process
� Return to work:�Recovery expectations
�Transitional Psychology� Cognitive, affective, identity
adjustment – perceived threats
�Building self-efficacy
�Psychology without action
does not workFree image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Return to Work – why is this so
important?
� Unemployment means:� Higher cardiovascular disease� Higher suicide
� Higher stroke
� Higher sleep disturbance� Higher traffic fatalities
� Higher anxiety� Higher depression
� Higher alcoholism� Higher healthcare use9
Free image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Expectations
� Acute versus chronic�Prevent stance of waiting for “someone (i.e.
medical professional) to do something”
�Warning signs:� Fear/catastrophizing
� Low self-efficacy
� Depressive symptoms
� Workplace factors
� Adversarial RTW process
Preparation
� Pain vs. Damage, Hurt vs. Harm
� Normalizing loss, grief and adjustment
� Kinesophobia
� Pain is physical and psychological = normalizing the complexity
� Return to work as part of healing
� Understanding the process of
other stakeholders
Preparation into Action
� Integration and practice
� Pacing and flare up management
� Reconnection with the workplace11
� Systematic review by France et al. identifies the importance of that connection to the workplace for reducing work disability
� Problem solving and coping
� Facilitating responsibility for the process (ownership)
Action (Return to Work)
� Creating the GRTW (Graduated Return to Work)
� Why a GRTW is a good idea
� Family Physician role/involvement
� Expectations post GRTW
Free image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Creating the GRTW – how and
why?
� How?
�Patient reported job demands
�Confirming job demands via a job site visit
(with patient if available)
�Confirming meaningful modified/lighter duties
�Functional program = starting point for GRTW
�Modifications if needed
Why do a GRTW?
� Reconnection with the workplace
� Gradual progression of hours
and duties
� Rehabilitation time as well as work hours
� Practice of active management skills when at work
� Development of self-efficacy
� Idea of durable abilities (helps claims process too)
Free image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Family Physician Involvement
� Keep family physician aware of plan
� Medical notes
�Changing the GRTW
�Stopping the GRTW
What to expect post GRTW
� As with any change in activity (i.e. starting rehabilitation or a GRTW) the patient is going to struggle with increased pain/symptoms and life balance
� Encouragement to continue is key
Conclusion
� Return to work with pain is more effective with coordinated treatment relationships viewing the problem through a biopsychosocial lens.
� Expect setbacks, continually reinforce patient capabilities and ongoing communication is key.
Case Review/Panel Discussion
� Review Case 1
� Discuss Case 2
� Questions
References
1. Moseley, G.L. (2003). A pain neuromatrix approach to patients with chronic pain. Manual Therapy, 8(3), 130-140.
2. Neil Pearson (2012, January 23). Acute versus Chronic Pain: Understanding the difference and choosing appropriate treatment. Retrieved from:www.orionhealth.ca.
3. Rossignol, M., Arsenault, B., Dionne, C., Poitras, S., Tousignant, M., Truchon, M., Allard, P., Cote, M., Neveu, A. (2007). Clinic on Low Back Pain in Interdisciplinary Practice (CLIP) guidelines. Montreal: Direction de sante publique, agence de la sante et des services sociale de Montreal. Retrieved from: http://www.bibliotheque.assnat.qc.ca/01/mono/2007/02/926313.pdf
4. Dunstan, D.A. (2009). Are sickness certificates doing our patients harm?. Australian Family Physician, 38 (1/2), 61 - 63.
5. Butler, D. & Moseley, G.L. (2003). Explain Pain. Adelaide: NOI Group Publications.
6. Illes, R. A., Davidson, M., & Taylor, N. F. (2008). Psychosocial predictors of failure to Return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 65, 507-517.
References
7. Stewart, A. M., Polak, E., Young, R., & Schulz, I. Z. (2012). Injured workers construction of expectations of return to work with sub-acute back pain: The role of perceived uncertainty. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22, 1-14.
8. Thorn, B. E (2004). Cognitive therapy for chronic pain: A step-by-step guide. The Guilford Press: London.
9. Jin, Shah and Svoboda (1995) The impact of unemployment on health.
10. Crook, J., & Modolfsky, H. (1994). The probability of recovery and return to work from work disability as a function of time. Quality of Life Research, 3 (Supplement 1), S97 - S109.
11. Franche, R.L., Cullen, K., Clarke, J., Irvin, E., Sinclair, S., Frank, J. and The Institute for Work & Health (IWH) Workplace-Based RTW Intervention Literature Review Research Team (2005). Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Quantitative Literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15 (4), 607-631.