supporting information · 4.15 Å, respectively (figure s6a2, s6c1 and s6c2). additionally, the...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Supporting Information
Pressure-induced remarkable emission enhancement based on
intermolecular charge transfer in halogen bond-driven
dual-component co-crystals
Aisen Li,1,2
Jing Wang,1 Yingjie Liu,
1 Shuping Xu,
1 Ning Chu,
1 Yijia Geng,
1 Bao Li,
1
Bin Xu, 1
Haining Cui,2* and Weiqing Xu
1*
1. State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials, Institute of
Theoretical Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, P. R. China
2. College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, P. R. China
*Email: [email protected]
Content
1. Raman spectra of pure BIPY and co-crystals. ............................................................................... 2
2. IR spectra of pure BIPY and co-crystals. ...................................................................................... 2
3. Single crystal data. ........................................................................................................................ 5
4. Analysis of intermolecular interactions of co-crystals. ................................................................. 6
5. Hirshfeld surface analysis of co-crystals. ...................................................................................... 8
6. Fluorescent spectra of BIPY-IPFB under UV irradiation. ............................................................ 9
7. Fluorescent spectra properties of BIPY-IFB. .............................................................................. 10
8. The calculated results of BIPY-DITFB. ...................................................................................... 11
9. Raman spectra of co-crystals under high pressure. ..................................................................... 12
References ....................................................................................................................................... 14
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.This journal is © the Owner Societies 2018
2
1. Raman spectra of pure BIPY and co-crystals.
Fiugre S1. The Raman spectra of BIPY, BIPY-IPFB, BIPY-DITFB, and BIPY-IFB in
the ranges of 100-1800 cm-1
(A) and 2800-3200 cm-1
(B), respectively.
2. IR spectra of pure BIPY and co-crystals.
Fiugre S2. The IR spectra of BIPY (black line), IPFB (red line) and co-crystal
BIPY-IPFB (blue line) in the ranges of 1200-2000 cm-1
(A) and 400-1200 cm-1
(B),
respectively.
500 1000 15000
10k
20k
BIPY-IFB
BIPY-DITFB
BIPY-IPFB
BIPY
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
Raman shift (cm-1)
2800 3000 32000
1k
2k
3k
4k
5k
BIPY-IFB
BIPY-DITFB
BIPY-IPFB
BIPY
Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
(A) (B)
2000 1800 1600 1400 12000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1507
1484
1513
1491
BIPY-IPFB
IPFB
BIPY
Tra
nsm
itta
nce
Wavenumber(cm-1)
1487
1200 1000 800 600 4000.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5BIPY-IPFB
IPFB
BIPY1074
1062
1084
1075
804
808
609
Tra
nsm
itta
nce
Wavenumber(cm-1)
606
(A) (B)
3
Fiugre S3. The IR spectra comparison of BIPY (black line), DITFB (red line) and
co-crystal BIPY-DITFB (blue line) of 2000 cm-1
-3600 cm-1
(A) and 400 cm-1
-2000
cm-1
(B).
Fiugre S4. The IR spectra comparison of BIPY (black line), IFB (red line) and
co-crystal BIPY-IFB (blue line) of 2000 cm-1
-3600 cm-1
(A) and 400 cm-1
-2000 cm-1
(B).
As displayed in Figure S2, for the pristine BIPY, the characteristic ring breathing
vibration bands of pyridine group appear at 1075 cm-1
and 1487 cm-1
, and the peak
located at 606 cm−1
and 808 cm−1
can be assigned to ring bending vibration and C-H
out-of-plane bending vibration, respectively. And upon assembly with the co-former
IPFB, the vibration bands experienced an obvious shift and were located at 1062 cm−1
(Δ = 13 cm−1
), 1484 cm-1
(Δ = 3 cm−1
), 609 cm−1
(Δ = 3 cm−1
) and 804 cm-1
(Δ = 4
cm−1
). At the same time, C-F stretching vibration at 1084 cm-1 of IPFB shifted
towards to 1074 cm-1 in BIPY-IPFB, while the bands at 1491 cm-1
and 1513 cm-1
assigned to ring stretching vibration shifted to 1484 cm-1
and 1507 cm-1
. Similarly, in
Figure S3, the bands at 606 cm−1
, 808 cm−1
and 1075 cm-1
also showed obvious
3000 2500 20000.0
0.2
0.4
BIPY
DITFB
BIPY-DITFB
Wavenumber(cm-1)
Tra
nsm
itta
nce
3072
(A) (B)
2000 1500 1000 5000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8BIPY-DITFB
1059
1075
808
1456
990
939
939
725
753
759
BIPY
DITFB
Wavenumber(cm-1)
Tra
nsm
itta
nce
733
988
1465
606
611
801
3000 2500 20000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
3072
BIPY-IFB
IFB
BIPY
Wavenumber(cm-1)
Tra
nsm
itta
nce
2000 1500 1000 5000.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1075
1064 702
808
799
702
1561
1591
1556
1591
610
650
650
BIPY-IFB
IFB
BIPY
Wavenumber(cm-1)
Tra
nsm
itta
nce
606
(A) (B)
4
change to 611 cm-1
(Δ = 5 cm−1
), 801 cm-1
(Δ = 7 cm−1
) and 1056 cm-1
(Δ = 19 cm−1
)
upon assembly with DITFB. Besides, the C-H out-of-plane bending vibration at 733
cm-1
shifted towards to 725 cm-1
, and the C-H out-of-plane bending vibration at 3072
cm-1
disappeared. Moreover, the C-F symmetrical deformation vibration of DITFB at
1465 cm-1
appeared in the IR spectra of co-crystals at 1456 cm-1
. As described in
Figure S4, the bands at 606 cm−1
, 808 cm−1
and 1075 cm-1
also showed obvious
change to 610 cm-1
(Δ = 4 cm−1
), 799 cm-1
(Δ = 9 cm−1
) and 1064 cm-1
(Δ = 11 cm−1
)
upon assembly with IFB. The band at 3072 cm-1
also disappeared and the obvious
bands at 650 cm-1
and 702 cm-1
attributed to C-F stretching vibration from IFB can be
observed in the BIPY-IFB co-crystal. All the spectroscopic changes described above
demonstrate the formation of the relative strong halogen bonding interaction (XB)
between the co-former and N atoms in the pyridine group.
5
3. Single crystal data.
Table S1. Crystal data and refinement parameters of BIPY-IPFB, BIPY-DITFB and
BIPY-IFB.
BIPY-IPFB BIPY-DITFB BIPY-IFB
Moiety formula C6 F5 I, 0.5(C10 H8 N2) C6 F4 I2, C10 H8 N2 C6 F3 I3, C10 H8 N2
Sum formula C11 H4 F5 I N C16 H8 F4 I2 N2 C16 H8 F3 I3 N2
Formula wt 372.05 558.04 665.94
T,K 293 K 293 K 273 K
Space group P 21/c P 21/c P n
A, Å 10.102(2) 8.3599(3) 4.1475(3)
B, Å 7.6653(15) 5.7208(2) 9.1050(6)
C, Å 14.953(3) 17.7679(7) 24.1464(17)
α, deg 90 90 90
β, deg 93.24(3) 96.344(1) 91.273(3)
γ, deg 90 90 90
Volume, Å3
1156.0(4) 844.55(5) 911.62(11)
Z 4 2 2
Density, Mg / m3
2.138 2.194 2.426
μ(M0 K α) , mm
-1
2.815 3.764 5.172
R(reflections) 0.0317( 2039) 0.0321( 1777) 0.0768( 2872)
wR2(reflections) 0.0702( 2637) 0.0791( 2096) 0.1929( 2887)
Goodness of fit 0.998 0.998
CCDC 1869982 1869981 1869998
6
4. Analysis of intermolecular interactions of co-crystals.
Fiugre S5. The molecular stacking mode of BIPY-IPFB (A), BIPY-DITFB (B), and
BIPY -IFB (C) along a axis (1) and b axis (2).
Figure S6. The analysis of intermolecular interactions of BIPY-IPFB (A),
BIPY-DITFB (B) and BIPY-IFB (C).
(A1)) (B1))
(A2))
(C1))
(B2)) (C2))
(A1)) (A2)) (A3))
(B1) (B2)) (B3))
(C1) (C2)) (C3))
7
Table S2. The analysis of intermolecular interactions of BIPY-DITFB.
Donor Hydrogen Acceptor DH(Å) HA(Å) DA(Å) DHA(deg)
C2 H2 F2 0.9302 2.6211 3.5269 164
C4 H4 F2 0.9294 2.6712 3.5846 167
C1 H1 F1 0.9302 3.9627 4.6668 135
C2 H2 F1 0.9302 3.9809 4.6661 133
C5 H5 I1 0.9303 3.4192 4.1840 141
Table S3. The analysis of intermolecular interactions of BIPY-IFB.
Donor Hydrogen Acceptor DH(Å) HA(Å) DA(Å) DHA(deg)
C8 H8 F2 0.9298 4.4152 4.9310 118.801
C13 H13 F2 0.9305 2.7405 3.4109 129.701
C10 H10 F3 0.9312 2.9957 3.3434 103.866
C16 H16 F3 0.9307 3.1308 4.0168 159.709
C5 I3 F1 2.0939 3.1000 5.0668 154.102
Firstly, they show different stacking modes because of the difference in co-formers
(Figure S5). It should be noted that the BIPY in BIPY-IPFB and BIPY-DITFB show
excellent planarity, while it does not for BIPY-IFB, which results from different
microenvironments in crystal aggregate state. Moreover, all the co-crystals show
parallel stacking and the expected π…π interactions are observed for BIPY-IPFB and
BIPY-IFB with the distance between the conjugated ring centroids from 3.98 Å to
4.15 Å, respectively (Figure S6A2, S6C1 and S6C2). Additionally, the CH…F
hydrogen bonds can be observed between the BIPY and fluorine-containing units in
the BIPY-DITFB and BIPY-IFB co-crystals (Figure S6B3, S6C3) and the detailed
measurements are summarized in Table S2 and Table S3. As illustrated in Figure
S6C3, a zig-zag halogen-bonding chain is produced for BIPY-IFB and connected with
the adjacent one by I…F close contacts (dI⋯F = 3.1000 Å in Table S3). And the
C-F…F-C weak noncovalent interactions are also shown in Figure S6A3 and S6B2
for BIPY-IPFB and BIPY-DITFB, which are known to be stabilizing and give
significant energy contributions for structures, as Pauling’s principle states that the
8
attractive interatomic dispersion forces would be low because of the low polarizability
of fluorine.1,2
Therefore, the introduction of electron withdrawing substituents (such
as -F) on the co-formers affords 3D architectures due to their ability to simultaneously
participate in additional intermolecular interactions besides the enhanced I…N
interactions.
5. Hirshfeld surface analysis of co-crystals.
Figure S7. Distribution of individual intermolecular interactions of each part in
BIPY-IPFB co-crystal of on the basis of Hirshfeld surface analysis.
Figure S8. Distribution of individual intermolecular interactions of each part in
BIPY-DITFB co-crystal of on the basis of Hirshfeld surface analysis.
7.50%
5.90%3.00%
22.70% 3.30%
13.30%
26.50%
45.10%
7.40%
5.10%
3.60%
5.20%
12.60%
7%
16.40%
15.40%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
IPFB
BIPY
C…C H…H F…F C…H H…F I…H I…N I…F H…N others
5.20%
5.70% 23.60%
4.50% 7.30%
13.80%
22.50%
19.70%
20.00%
7.90%
6.20%
4.80%
14.70%
10%
19.60%
14.50%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
DITPB
BIPY
C…C H…H F…F C…H H…F I…H I…N I…F H…N others
9
Figure S9. Distribution of individual intermolecular interactions of each part in
BIPY-IFB co-crystal of on the basis of Hirshfeld surface analysis.
6. Fluorescent spectra of BIPY-IPFB under UV irradiation.
Figure S10. The variation of in situ fluorescent spectra of BIPY-IPFB after UV
irradiation as UV irradiation time increasing.
7.00%
10.60% 17.60%
1.60%
1.30%
14.00%
20.30%
20.00%
29.80%
17.70%
7.30%
5.20%
13.50%
9%
19.20%
5.90%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
IFB
BIPY
C…C H…H F…F C…H H…F I…H I…N I…F H…N others
500 600 700 8000
10k
20k
30k
40k
50k
60kAfter UV irradiation
Inte
nsity(a
.u.)
Wavelength(nm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
30
60
Time/min
10
7. Fluorescent spectra properties of BIPY-IFB.
Figure S11. (A) The fluorescent spectra of BIPY-IFB co-crystal during compression
and corresponding photos (B) via DAC device. Excitation wavelength was 365 nm.
The scale is 100 μm.
Figure S12. The fluorescent spectra recovery properties of BIPY-IFB co-crystal via
DAC. Excitation wavelength was 365 nm.
500 600 700 8000.0
4.0k
8.0k
12.0k
16.0k
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
Wavelength (nm)
0 GPa
0.50 GPa
1.04 GPa
1.22 GPa
1.95 GPa
2.43 GPa
2.91 GPa
3.64 GPa
4.16 GPa
5.00 GPa
5.92 GPa
6.68 GPa
7.36 GPa
7.79 GPa
8.31 GPa
(A) (B)0GPa 0.50GPa 1.04GPa 1.22GPa 1.95GPa
2.43GPa
5.92GPa
5.00GPa 4.16GPa 3.64GPa 2.91GPa
7.36GPa 7.79GPa 8.31GPa6.68GPa
500 600 700 8000.0
2.0k
4.0k
6.0k
8.0k
release
Wavelength (nm)
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
0 GPa
release
0 GPa
11
8. The calculated results of BIPY-DITFB.
Figure S13. Calculated stacking structure of BIPY-DITFB under different pressure
and the detailed measurement of distances between adjacent BIPY molecules or
DITFB molecules for comparison.
4.520
3.3303.366
3.447
3.442
3.560
3.394
3.352
4.440
3.249
3.3343.397
3.214
3.290
3.192
3.209
3.183
3.245
0GPa 2GPa
6GPa 7GPa 8GPa
3GPa 4GPa 5GPa
1GPa
12
9. Raman spectra of co-crystals under high pressure.
Figure S14. Raman spectra of BIPY-DITFB co-crystal at different pressure values via
DAC up to 9.16 GPa. Excitation wavelength was 633 nm.
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1600 18000.0
4.0k
8.0k
12.0k
16.0k
0.44 GPa
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
Raman shift (cm-1)
0 GPa
0.91 GPa
1.56 GPa
1.97 GPa
2.39 GPa
2.74 GPa
0.0
4.0k
8.0k
12.0k
16.0k
3.33 GPa
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
9.16 GPa
8.28 GPa
7.47 GPa
6.42 GPa
5.20 GPa
3.97 GPa
13
Figure S15. (a) Raman spectra of BIPY-IFB co-crystal at different pressure values via
DAC up to 3.72 Gpa, and the recovered Raman spectra of the BIPY-IFB co-crystal
after the decompression. Excitation wavelength was 633 nm.
Figure S16. Raman spectra of the BIPY-DITBF co-crystal upon the decompression
process (a) and the recovery of the BIPY-DITBF (b). Excitation wavelength was 633
nm.
Figure S17. Pressure dependence of Raman shifts 168 cm-1
(A), 1002 cm-1
(B), 1220,
1239, 1295 and 1301 cm-1
(C) in BIPY-IFB co-crystal.
300 600 900 1200 1600 18000.0
2.0k
4.0k
6.0k
0.25 GPa
3.72 GPa
3.04 GPa
2.59 GPa
1.99 GPa
1.30 GPa
0.82 GPa
0.65 GPa
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
Raman shift (cm-1)
0 GPa
(a) (b)
300 600 900 1200 1600 18000
300
600
900
1200
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
Raman shift (cm-1)
0 GPa
release
200 400 600 800 10001200 1600 1800
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
Raman shift (cm-1
)
25000
release
9.16 GPa
6.25 GPa
5.43 GPa
4.72 GPa
4.15 GPa
3.15 GPa
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1600 18000.0
3.0k
6.0k
9.0k
In
tensity (
a.u
.)
Raman shift (cm-1)
0 GPa
release
(a) (b)
0 1 2 3 4
168
169
170
171
172
Ram
an
shift (c
m-1)
Pressure (GPa)
0 1 2 3 4
1220
1240
1260
1280
1300
1320
Pressure (GPa)
Ram
an
shift (c
m-1)
0 1 2 3 41000
1004
1008
1012
1016
Ram
an
shift (c
m-1)
Pressure (GPa)
(A) (B)
(C)
14
Table S4. Assignment and frequencies (cm-1
) of observed Raman internal modes of
BIPY-DITFB co-crystal in comparison with DFT simulation results.
Experimental value
(cm-1
)
Theoretical value
(cm-1
)
Vibrational mode
150 149 C-I stretching vibration
1007 1009 Triangular ring breathing vibration of BIPY
1216 1235 C-H rocking vibration in plane
1236 1240 C-H rocking vibration in plane
ring breathing vibration of DITFB
1284 1305 C-C stretching vibration
ring breathing vibration of BIPY
C-H rocking vibration in plane
1597 1621 C=C=C antisymmetric stretching vibration of
DITFB
1609 1628 C=C=C antisymmetric stretching vibration of
BIPY
C-C stretching vibration
1612 1637 C=C=C antisymmetric stretching vibration of
BIPY
C-C stretching vibration
Table S5. Assignment and frequencies (cm-1
) of observed Raman internal modes of
BIPY-IFB co-crystal in comparison with DFT simulation results.
Experimental value
(cm-1
)
Theoretical value
(cm-1
)
Vibrational mode
168 165 C-I stretching vibration
1002 1003 Triangular ring breathing vibration of BIPY
1220 1238 C-H rocking vibration in plane
1295 1305 C=C=C antisymmetric stretching vibration of IFB
C-H rocking vibration in plane
C-C stretching vibration
References
1. V. G. Saraswatula and B. K. Saha, New J. Chem., 2014, 38, 897-901. .
2. K. Reichenbacher, H. I. Suss and J. Hulliger, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34, 22-30.