supply chain of the power sector - map agribusiness and ... development/energy...lowering barriers...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Overview of the Philippine Power
Sector & related issues
February 12, 2013
2
Supply Chain of the Power
Sector
3
Supply Chain of the
Philippine Power Sector
NPC,
Privatized
GenCo’s, &
IPPs
Wholesale
Electricity
Spot Market
(WESM)
Meralco
Independent
Power
Producers
(IPPs)
Nat’l Grid
Corp of the
Phil (NGCP)
Generation Transmission
Distribution &
SupplyOverview of the unbundled
electric bill
4
5
Supply chain is mirrored by the
unbundled electric bill
Generation
Transmission
Distribution & Supply
End-users
� Section 36 of RA 9136
� “The distribution wheeling charge shall be unbundled from the retail rate …”
� “’Any electric power industry participant shall functionally and structurally unbundle its … rates …”
(from an actual bill of a very large industrial customer) 6
7 8
Pass-through charges and
DU/Meralco chargesPASS-THROUGH
• Generation Charge
• Transmission Charge
• System Loss Charge
• Universal Charges
– Missionary Electrification
– Environmental
• Taxes
– Local Franchise Tax
– Value-Added Tax (VAT)?
• Cross-subsidies
DISTRIBUTION
UTILITY (DU)
• Distribution Charge
• Metering Charge
• Supply Charge
2012 overall average ratePreliminary results
9
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
10
Generation Charge moves Generation Charge moves
from month to monthfrom month to monthFebruary 2013 Generation Charge: P5.2414/kWhFebruary 2013 Generation Charge: P5.2414/kWh
Ph
P/k
Wh
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
Jan
ua
ry 1
0
Fe
bru
ary
10
Ma
rch
10
Ap
ril
10
Ma
y 1
0
Jun
e 1
0
July
10
Au
gu
st 1
0
Se
pte
mb
er
10
Oct
ob
er
10
No
vem
ber
10
De
cem
be
r 1
0
Jan
ua
ry 1
1
Fe
bru
ary
11
Ma
rch
11
Ap
ril
11
Ma
y 1
1
Jun
e 1
1
July
11
Au
gu
st 1
1
Se
pte
mb
er
11
Oct
ob
er
11
No
vem
ber
11
De
cem
be
r 1
1
Jan
ua
ry 1
2
Fe
bru
ary
12
Ma
rch
12
Ap
ril
12
Ma
y 1
2
Jun
e 1
2
July
12
Au
gu
st 1
2
Se
pte
mb
er
12
Oct
ob
er
12
No
vem
ber
12
De
cem
be
r 1
2
Jan
ua
ry 1
3
Fe
bru
ary
13
Billing Month
Factors affecting the Generation
Charge
11
Reduction mainly due to the Reduction mainly due to the
cheaper PSA ratescheaper PSA rates
Power Supply Agreements Power Supply Agreements
(PSAs)(PSAs)
GENERATING
COMPANY
CONTRACTED
CAPACITY FUEL TERM
Therma Luzon Inc.
(TLI) 350 MW Coal 7 yrs.,
extendable upon
agreement of
parties
San Miguel Energy
Corporation (SMEC) 200-500 MW Coal
Masinloc Power
Partners Co. Ltd.
(MPPCL)
330-430 MW Coal
7 yrs.,
extendable for
another 3 yrs.
SEM-Calaca Power
Corp. (SCPC) 210-420 MW Coal
South Premiere
Power Corp.
(SPPC)
1,180 MW Nat. Gas
Independent Power Producers Independent Power Producers
(IPPs)(IPPs)
GENERATING
COMPANY
CONTRACTED
CAPACITY FUEL
Quezon Power Phils.
Ltd. (QPPL)460 MW Coal
First Gas Power Corp.
Sta. Rita1,000 MW Nat. Gas
FGP Corp.
San Lorenzo500 MW Nat. Gas
Transmission Sector
• Regulated common electricity carrier business
• Subject to regulation by ERC
• Wheeling charges are set using a rate-setting methodology called Performance-Based Regulation (PBR)
2012 overall average ratePreliminary results
16
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
17
Components of the
Transmission Charge
Transmission ChargeTransmission Charge
Wheeling Charges• Power Delivery Service
• System Operations Charge
• Supply & Metering Charges
Wheeling Charges• Power Delivery Service
• System Operations Charge
• Supply & Metering Charges
Ancillary Service Charges• Dispatchable Reserve
• Contingency Reserve
• Frequency Regulation
• Reactive Power Support
• Black Start
Ancillary Service Charges• Dispatchable Reserve
• Contingency Reserve
• Frequency Regulation
• Reactive Power Support
• Black Start
• Goes to NGCP
• Regulated via Performance-Based
Regulation (PBR)
• Collected by NGCP & paid to
generators
• Regulated via the Ancillary Services
Procurement Plan (ASPP) & AS-Cost
Recovery Mechanism (AS-CRM)
2012 overall average ratePreliminary results
18
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
19
Recoverable level of distribution
system losses• Republic Act 7832 (Anti-Electricity Pilferage Act)
– Imposes stiffer penalties for electricity pilferage, but sets ceiling on system losses that can be recovered through rates
– System loss caps for private utilities• 1996 14.50 percent
• 1997 13.25
• 1998 11.75
• 1999 up to 2009 9.5
• In December 11, 2009, ERC announced a further reduction of the System Loss Cap
Up to 2009 Starting 2010
Cap Private DU’s 9.5% 8.5%
Coops 14% 13%
Ang liwanag ng bukas
System Loss Cap
� Record system loss at 7.04%, an improvement of 0.31% vs. 2011’s 7.35%� Record system loss at 7.04%, an improvement of 0.31% vs. 2011’s 7.35%
8.5%
9.5%
SAVINGS TO CUSTOMER
2008: P0.36 Bn2009: 1.37 2010: 1.13 2011: 2.38 2012: 3.43
Total : P8.68 Bn(or equivalent to 5.96¢/kWh)
SAVINGS TO CUSTOMERSAVINGS TO CUSTOMER
2008: P0.36 Bn2009: 1.37 2010: 1.13 2011: 2.38 2012: 3.43
Total : P8.68 Bn(or equivalent to 5.96¢/kWh)
7.04
1.4
6%
2012 overall average ratePreliminary results
21
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
22
Universal Charges, Taxes, &
Lifeline Susibidies• Local Franchise Tax
– Distribution utilities are required to pay local franchise taxes. Goes to local government units
• Value-Added Tax (VAT)?– With Republic Act 9337, VAT was imposed on the power industry, in lieu of the
national franchise tax. Remitted to the national government
• Universal Charges– A non-bypassable charge remitted to the Power Sector Assets and Liabilities
Management Corporation (PSALM)
– Part of this is now in the bills as missionary electrification and environmental charges
• Lifeline Subsidy– Section 73 of EPIRA: “A socialized pricing mechanism called a lifeline rate for the
marginalized end-users shall be set by the ERC, which shall be exempted from the cross subsidy phase-out under this Act for a period of ten (10) years, unless extended by law. The level of consumption and the rate shall be determined by the ERC after due notice and hearing”
– Discounts to marginalized end-users will be subsidized by all other customers of the DU
23 24
Cross-subsidization within the
residential customer class
KWh Consumption
Distribution Charge (P/kWh)
Lifeline Rate Subsidy (P/kWh)
Lifeline Discount
(% of Charge)
1-20 1.1945 - 100%
21-50 1.1945 - 50%
51-70 1.1945 - 35%
71-100 1.1945 - 20%
101-200 1.1945 0.1497 -
201-300 1.5518 0.1497 -
301-400 1.8890 0.1497 -
401 up 2.4763 0.1497 - • Customers with low consumption simultaneously enjoy a lower
distribution charge and a lifeline discount
• On the other hand, larger consumers are both imposed a higher distribution charge and provide a lifeline subsidy
(Figures are for February 2013)
25
Pass-through charges and
Meralco chargesPASS-THROUGH
• Generation Charge
• Transmission Charge
• System Loss Charge
• Universal Charges
– Missionary Electrification
– Environmental
• Taxes
– Local Franchise Tax
– Value-Added Tax (VAT)?
• Cross-subsidies
DISTRIBUTION
UTILITY
• Distribution Charge
• Metering Charge
• Supply Charge
Distribution Sector
• Regulated common carrier business requiring a franchise
• Subject to regulation by ERC
• As of 2009, the distribution sector is composed by– 120 electric cooperatives
– 17 private utilities
– 8 local government-owned utilities
Source: 2009 Distribution Development Plan
• Widely varying in size &
technical/ financial standing
• Different technical standards
(e.g., distribution voltage levels,
metering) from DU to DU
• Widely varying in size &
technical/ financial standing
• Different technical standards
(e.g., distribution voltage levels,
metering) from DU to DU
2012 overall average ratePreliminary results
27
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
The Generation Charge is the single
biggest component of the electric bill
28
Under PBR, there is greater consumer
involvement and transparency
• Rate-setting process under PBR: before each regulatory period (four regulatory years), the ERC evaluates and determines a utility’s:– Forecasted energy sales and demand
– Proposed performance standards
– Annual Revenue Requirement and Maximum Average Prices
Performance standards
• Interruptions
• Voltage regulation
• Time to connect
• Call-center performance
• System loss
Market forecasts• Energy & demand
• Exchange rates
• CPI (US & Phil)
Projections (2012-2015)
• Capital expenditures
• Regulatory asset base
• Operating Expenses
• Taxes & feesAnnual Revenue
Requirement &
Maximum Average
Prices (2012-2015)
Allowed return (WACC)
PBRPBRPBR
Performance standards
• Interruptions
• Voltage regulation
• Time to connect
• Call-center performance
• System loss
Market forecasts• Energy & demand
• Exchange rates
• CPI (US & Phil)
Projections (2012-2015)
• Capital expenditures
• Regulatory asset base
• Operating Expenses
• Taxes & feesAnnual Revenue
Requirement &
Maximum Average
Prices (2012-2015)
Allowed return (WACC)
PBRPBRPBR
29
Performance-Incentive
Scheme (PIS) under PBR• Under PBR, a Performance Incentive Scheme (PIS) is
established to measure the performance of the DU according to key areas of service quality – Customers are financially compensated when the DU fails to
meet performance standards
• Two components of the PIS are in place
Price-Linked Incentive Scheme. Rates are adjusted depending on utility’s actual performance
Price-Linked Incentive Scheme. Rates are adjusted depending on utility’s actual performance
Guaranteed Service Levels (GSL). Customers are directly
compensated if the utility does not meet performance thresholds
Guaranteed Service Levels (GSL). Customers are directly compensated if the utility does not meet performance thresholds
Price-Linked Incentive Scheme. Rates are adjusted depending on utility’s actual performance
Price-Linked Incentive Scheme. Rates are adjusted depending on utility’s actual performance
Guaranteed Service Levels (GSL). Customers are directly
compensated if the utility does not meet performance thresholds
Guaranteed Service Levels (GSL). Customers are directly compensated if the utility does not meet performance thresholds
30
PBR implementation
ERC Final Determination:
Maximum Average Prices (MAP)
International comparison of
power prices
31 32
Source: Joint Foreign Chambers forum (Oct. 28, 2010)
Average Retail Electricity Tariffs (All 44 Markets Surveyed)
June, 2012
Notes
1.Weighted average tariff (all customer categories) excluding VAT2.Tariffs for US (average) and Euro countries are for Nov 11. All other countries/states (incl Hawaii & California) are for Jan 2012
3.Assumes tariffs in 50 US states have no “Other” taxes
4.Estimated subsidies are based on long-run marginal cost of supply (including fuel subsidies) calculated by IEC
Page 33
Regional Comparison of Subsidies
June, 2012
Implied Subsidy
36%37% 51% 54%
50%
A comparison of true cost of supply versus average tariffs shows that many countries
in the region heavily subsidize their electricity rates. These subsidies have been
mainly caused by the inability to pass through fuel price increases during that period
Subsidized Fuel ?
Deferred Capex ?
Additional Debt ? ?
Cash Grant ?
Subsidy Mechanism
Page 34
USAID preliminary study (Oct 2011)
36
Estimated Government Subsidy in Estimated Government Subsidy in Certain CountriesCertain Countries
2010 Subsidy (in billions of dollars)
Country
OilNatural Gas
Coal Electricity Total Subsidy per person ($/person)
Share of GDP (%)
Indonesia 10.15 5.79 15.94 66.50 2.30
Thailand 2.11 0.48 0.44 5.44 8.47 122.70 2.70
Malaysia 3.89 0.97 0.81 5.67 199.60 2.40
Philippines 1.10 1.10 11.80 0.60
Source: International Energy Agency / Institute for Energy Research
Conclusions
• Meralco’s average retail electricity tariff ranks 9th among the 44 markets surveyed &
2nd highest in the Asia region (after Japan which is 17% higher)
• Although Meralco’s tariffs are – in some cases - more than double those of its
regional counterparts, the main reason (>75%) for the difference is government
subsidies that are provided to customers and/or utilities in these markets so that
tariffs remain well below the cost of supply.
• IEC believes that such subsidies are poor economic policy and unsustainable.
Customers accustomed to cheap power in these subsidized markets are likely to
suffer extreme price shocks when subsidies are removed which IEC believes is likely in
the short- to medium-term
• In contrast, Meralco’s tariffs are fully cost-reflective which is sound economic policy
in a high growth market such as Luzon which has limited available capital
• The remaining 25% of the tariff differential is attributable to the higher underlying
cost of supply in the Philippines. (When subsidies are added back to the tariffs in
lower-priced countries, the total cost of supply in these markets is comparable with
or even higher than in Luzon)
• The main causes of the higher underlying cost of supply in Luzon include imported
fuel costs, high cost-of-capital, smaller grid size/volume, transmission cross-subsidies
and challenging geography
June, 2012 Page 37
Conclusions (cont’d)
• Efforts to reduce the total cost of supply should principally focus on
lowering barriers for new generation. The greatest barrier to the entry of
new IPPs in Luzon is the lack of access to long-term, large-scale PPAs with
creditworthy offtakers. Measures to facilitate the entry of new generation
include certainty on the schedule of Retail Open Access and the aggregation
of smaller distribution companies
• IEC notes that very little of the tariff is within the control of Meralco and
monthly rates variations are mainly a function of global fuel and currency
market fluctuations in the generation market
• Based on a comparison of the individual components of Meralco’s tariff
with the intrinsic cost of supply in Luzon and rates/costs in other markets,
IEC judges that Meralco’s rates are currently fair and reasonable
June, 2012 Page 38
What’s Meralco doing?
39
� Securing new competitively priced “Power Supply Agreements”
for 2012-19
� Building up to 2,500 MW +/- on-stream between 2015/6 to 2020
� Highly reliable and fuel efficient
� Coal, CCGT (Nat Gas & LNG), hydro and potentially wind
� Joint ventures with strategic partners
� Seeking new more cost competitive fuel sources (coal, nat gas and
LNG), local or offshore
� Work with industry for synchronized maintenance turnarounds of
Gencos.
POWER SUPPLY RELIABILITY & SUPPLY COST (58% of Ave Customer Bill)
� Flat Distribution charge/kWh over the next 4 years (2012-2015)
� About 60-65% Transmission Charge/kWh will be relatively flat until
2015, the balance of 35-40% constituting ancillary service charges
which may fluctuate.
� Massive Capex/investments in further strengthening T & D system
� P45Bn for Meralco alone over 4 years
� Supporting drive for more effective T & D coordination /
synchronization to minimize supply interruptions
TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION (T&D) RELIABILITY AND COST
(26 % of Ave Customer Bill) � Advocacy for reduced government take in the form of national /
local taxes on electricity, royalty on nat gas, et. al.
� Advocacy for judicious action on any new Universal Charges
TAXES & UNIVERSAL CHARGES (10% of Ave Customer Bill)
� Actively drive energy efficiency and consumption for Industrial,
Commercial and Residential customers
� Energy saving campaigns / conservation-tips for households
� Energy advise and services for commercial and industrial customers
� Piloting Pre-paid Metering for residential customers as part of broader
Smart Grid
� Actively supporting e-Vehicle Programs
CONTAIN CONSUMER SPEND ON POWER