BP-S00132 STC BHS DBOM Procurement

Supplemental Investigation Update

Presentation Overview• February 9, 2018 PSC Meeting• Scope of Supplemental Investigation• Expert Investigation and Findings• GOAA’s Supplemental Investigation• Updated Timeline and Observations• Options for Proceeding, Questions and

Public Comments

1

Outcome of February 9, 2018 PSC Meeting

• All proposers allowed opportunity to update Staffing Planby February 16, 2018

• Investigation by Third-Party Forensic Data Expert

• Continued Investigation by the Greater Orlando AviationAuthority

2

Focus of Additional Investigation: Was there an existence, or at a minimum the appearance, of a conflict of interest and other irregularities stemming from PMA’s role as GOAA’s OAR and PMA’s teaming with Jervis B. Webb

on the BP-S000132 STC BHS DBOM Procurement?

Staffing Plan Updates

• At the February 9, 2018 PSC Meeting, Jervis B. Webbstated they would be excluding PMA from their StaffingPlan

• PMA likewise indicated they would not object if theywere excluded

• On February 16, 2018, Jervis B. Webb submitted aRevised Staffing Plan that did not include PMA

• Neither Glidepath nor Vanderlande submitted an updatedStaffing Plan

3

Main Considerations for Supplemental Investigation

To provide a comprehensive review giventhe two-week timeframe that minimizesdelay to the South Terminal C project,since BHS is on the critical path

To address the privacy and public recordsconcerns associated with the reviewmethods of different devices and content

4

“Revised Protocol” GOAA, with the cooperation of PMA and Jervis B. Webb,

created a protocol to guide the investigation by the forensicdata consultant (Data Analyzers LLC) and GOAA

Provides a realistic scope for a forensic data investigationin the allotted timeframe

Requires PMA to supplement the forensic datainvestigation with emails from PMA email server betweenPMA and Jervis B. Webb, and emails between NoelAlvarez and Martin Ineichen

Requires PMA and Jervis B. Webb to retain a third-partyconsultant to preserve forensic copies of the cell phonespossibly used in connection with this procurement

5

Devices Reviewed by Data Analyzers Jervis B. Webb. 11 computers or laptops belonging

to:• Sales Department: Todd Alderman, Joe Emery, Ken Hamel,

Colin Oatley, Alex Wuchute• Estimating: Alan Daavettila, Dave Daavettila, Paul Lalinsky,

Brian Hoppe• Project Management: Andrew Grusnick

PMA: 4 laptops used by:• Martin Ineichen, Noel Alvarez, Richard Johnson, Robert Sanders*

GOAA: 2 computers used by:• Martin Ineichen, Noel Alvarez

* The laptop used by Robert Sanders required a specialty SSD adapter and could notbe unencrypted within the investigation timeframe

6

Notable Findings

No evidence in the metadata and system artifactssuggest that Jervis B. Webb had in its possessionany of the Technical and Design Proposalspreviewed or downloaded by Mr. Martin Ineichen

The Technical and Design Proposals previewed anddownloaded by Mr. Ineichen were not found on anycomputer system examined by Data Analyzers

7

As Related to All Computers:

Notable Findings

The computer did not contain a copy of the Technicaland Design Proposals Mr. Ineichen previewed ordownloaded

There was no USB storage device connected to thecomputer at the time of the incident

The metadata timeline shows that after accessingthe Technical and Design Proposals on box.com, Mr.Ineichen accessed PMA’s web-based outlook emailservice*

8

As Related to Mr. Ineichen’s GOAA Computer(The computer on which the proposal documents were viewed):

* Mr. Ineichen’s PMA emails provided by PMA did not contain a copy of the Technical and Design Proposals

Notable Findings

The metadata and system artifacts on Mr. Martin Ineichen’sPMA laptop were altered, which Data Analyzers considersdigital forensic evidence of tampering

9

As Related to Mr. Ineichen’s PMA Computer:

Information Considered in Supplemental Investigation

Emails provided by PMA in accordance withRevised Protocol

Martin Ineichen’s box.com usage from June 1,2017 through present

Martin Ineichen’s and Noel Alvarez’sunencrypted internet history on their respectiveGOAA computers

Affidavits submitted Jervis B. Webb personnel Affidavits submitted by Jervis B. Webb’s and

PMA’s respective third-party IT consultants

10

Updated Timeline of Events

11

Date Event(s)October 25, 2017 • Meeting between Jervis B. Webb and PMA (initially

set for September)• Martin Ineichen previews three sections of

Glidepath’s SOQ from box.com

October 26, 2017 • Noel Alvarez emailed Robert Sanders to determinewho could compile a Statement of Qualifications forDAIFUKU*

October 27, 2017 • Martin Ineichen previews two sections ofGlidepath’s SOQ and the SOQs of Siemens andVanderlande from box.com

* Nothing from the email exchanges indicate whether this SOQ would be for DAIFUKU’s consideration for the STC BHS procurement or another procurement.

Statement of Qualifications

Notable Observations

Mr. Martin Ineichen accessed box.com to view the Statement of Qualifications by Glidepath, Siemens, and Vanderlandeafter they were submitted

12

Updated Timeline of Events

13

Date Event(s)November 10, 2017 • PSC voted to shortlist all proposersNovember 27, 2017 • Mary Aiello (PMA) responded to Noel Alvarez and

Robert Sanders with the third draft of the Statementof Qualifications for DAIFUKU*

December 5, 2017 • Technical Pre-Proposal Conference held; AllShortlisted Proposers were in attendance either inperson or via Webinar

December 7, 2017 • Martin Ineichen previews the third Technical Pre-Proposal Attendance Sheet and Addendum 5through box.com

* Nothing from the email exchanges indicate whether this SOQ would be for DAIFUKU’s consideration for the STC BHS procurement or another procurement.

Events Following Shortlisting

Notable Observations

Mr. Martin Ineichen accessed box.com to view proposal documents:• Third Technical Pre-Proposal Attendance Sheet• Addendum 5

14

Updated Timeline of Events

15

Date Event(s)Dec. 7-12, 2017 • Internal e-mails between PMA staff regarding

teaming with Jervis B. Webb

Dec. 22, 2017 –Jan. 3, 2017

• Jervis and PMA discuss and sign Teaming and Non-Disclosure Agreements

January 3, 2017 • Alex Wuchte sends Noel Alvarez a schedule so thatNoel Alvarez can “start putting a quote together forthe management [they] have discussed”

January 8, 2017 • At the request of Alex Wuchte, Noel Alvarez sendsAlex Wuchte the resumes of Martin Ineichen (PMA),Shaun Steif (PMA), John Philbrick (PMA), and hisown

Teaming Agreement

Updated Timeline of Events

16

Date Event(s)January 15, 2018 • Alex Wuchte emails Noel Alvarez copies of Jervis’

Organizational Chart and Executive Summary for Noel Alvarez’s review and comments

January 16, 2018 • Noel Alvarez responds to Alex Wuchte with edits and comments on the Organizational Chart and Executive Summary

• Noel Alvarez sends Alex Wuchte a “rough staffing plan”January 18, 2018 • STC BHS Technical and Design Proposals due and

submitted by Glidepath, Jervis B. Webb and Vanderlande

January 19, 2018 • Mr. Ineichen previewed all Technical Proposals and downloaded the Glidepath Technical proposal at 1:02 p.m.

• Data Analyzers concluded that Mr. Ineichen did not download the Glidepath Technical proposal onto his computer; A review of Mr. Ineichen’s PMA emails showed Mr. Ineichen did not email the proposal to Jervis or Noel Alvarez

Technical Proposals

Notable Observations Mr. Noel Alvarez commented on a draft of the Executive

Summary prepared by Jervis B. Webb prior to its submissionsuggesting:

• The August 11, 2017 PSC Meeting Minutes shows that GOAA’sLegal Counsel publically made this statement:

17

Options for Proceeding Accept Jervis B. Webb’s Revised Staffing Plan

and continue procurement with all threeproposers

Disqualify Jervis B. Webb Postpone STC BHS procurement pending further

investigation of Jervis B. Webb Cancel the STC BHS procurement and initiate a

new, perhaps different procurement methodology Other options and considerations may be

presented by the Shortlisted Proposers

18

19

Question and Answer

20

Public Comments

Additional Investigation Extensions

With additional time and an examination beyondthe system metadata, Data Analyzers could:• Create an adaptor that so that Mr. Robert Sanders’ PMA

laptop, which contains a proprietary interface can beaccessed

• Further investigate the record manipulation that occurred onMr. Ineichen’s PMA laptop

• Examine why the file Mr. Ineichen downloaded from box.comdid not appear on the GOAA computer

21