supplement to report: commute sheds as a regional water management decision tool this is a working...
TRANSCRIPT
Supplement to Report:Commute Sheds as a Regional Water Management Decision Tool
This is a working file, subject to updates.
For individual use only.Please contact author prior to redistribution or citation.
[email protected]©2009
Commute Shedsas an Integrated Watershed Management Decision Tool
Benjamin Young LandisNicholas School of the EnvironmentDuke University
BACKGROUND: OnTheMap is a new software that analyzes commute sheds – a type of regional resource analysis
QUESTION: Does commute shed analysis have applications in regional water supply decision making?
CASE STUDY: Upper Neuse River Basin, NC
Abstract
RaleighWake Forest, Rolesville, Knightdale, Wendell, Zebulon, Garner
RaleighWake Forest, Rolesville, Knightdale, Wendell, Zebulon, Garner
HillsboroughHillsborough
South GranvilleButner, Stem, Creedmoor
South GranvilleButner, Stem, Creedmoor
DurhamDurham
Upper NeuseRiver BasinUpper NeuseRiver Basin
Falls Lake
Chapel Hill(Cape Fear Basin)Chapel Hill, Carrboro
Chapel Hill(Cape Fear Basin)Chapel Hill, Carrboro
Jordan Lake(Cape Fear Basin)Cary, Morrisville, Apex
Jordan Lake(Cape Fear Basin)Cary, Morrisville, Apex
Jordan Lake
Kerr Lake (Roanoke Basin)Oxford, Henderson, South Henderson
Kerr Lake (Roanoke Basin)Oxford, Henderson, South Henderson
“Water supply is no longer just a function of individual communities. Clearly, it's a regional issue.”
-- Sydney Paul MillerWater Resources Program Manager
Triangle J Council of Governments(“Will the Water Run Out?” Town Hall, 08 January 2008)
• Disparate Supply: Some cities have adequate water supplies and facilities. Some do not.
• Cities are moving towards regional sharing and optimization of water supplies
• Need new tools to inform water sharing decisions and trace flows of water benefits
• Can commute sheds offer a new perspective?
Water Supply Around the Upper Neuse
• Watershed:– The flow of water from sources to receiving sink
• Commute shed:– The flow of commuters from home city to city of
employment
• Analyzed by tourism and labor economists• Used by city planners to attract development
and site public services
Commute Sheds and OnTheMap
• OnTheMap version 3– U.S. Census Bureau, 2008
• Determines:– Number of workers in a home city– Number of workers that commute– To which other cities these workers commute
• Analyze by subgroups (e.g. by earnings)
Commute Sheds and OnTheMap
Commute Sheds and OnTheMap
• Recall: Cities are moving towards regional sharing and optimization of water supplies
• Cities would physically connect and benefit from each other’s water supply
• But, are cities already “virtually connected” and benefiting from each other’s water supply?
Applying Commute Sheds toRegional Water Supplies
• A city invests in water supply and infrastructure to help sustain its residents
• Residents work, and generate economic impact
• Thus: – Water supply helps generate economic impact– Economic impact is a benefit of water supply
Applying Commute Sheds toRegional Water Supplies
• When residents commute to a different city to work, they export their economic impact
• These commuters also export the benefits of their home city’s water supply
• Commute sheds represent the exports of water supply benefits amongst cities
Applying Commute Sheds toRegional Water Supplies
• Application: Analyze the exports of water supply benefits amongst cities, illustrating their “virtual connection”
• Analysis Steps: 1. Find number of resident workers using OnTheMap 2. Estimate economic impact generated by workers 3. Determine portion exported by commuting workers
• Unit of Comparison: city boundaries– As a proxy for water utility service areas
Exports of Water Supply Benefits
• GDP is standard unit of economic impact• City-level GDP not available
• Used primary job earnings per worker reported by OnTheMap to estimate economic impact
Monthly Earnings Workers Estimate Product Months Per Year
<$1,200 36,639 x $1,200 = 43,966,800 x 12 = 527,601,600
$1,201 to $3,400 70,128 x $3,400 = 238,435,200 x 12 = 2,861,222,400
> $3,400 72,216 x $6,800 = 491,068,800 x 12 = 5,892,825,600
ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACT Supported by RALEIGH = $9,281,649,600
Exports of Water Supply Benefits
UPPER NEUSE BASINWater Supply Benefits
Supported by Each CityIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
UPPER NEUSE BASINWater Supply Benefits
Supported by Each CityIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
DURHAM$4,590 million
HILLSBOROUGH$149 million
SOUTH GRANVILLE$126 million
SOUTH GRANVILLE$126 million
RALEIGH$9,282 million
$9,281 million$8,482million
Durham-$800 million
Hillsborough-$6.2 million
South Granville-$4.9 million
$8,470million$8,358million
Chapel Hill-$113 million
$7,554million
Jordan Lake-$803 million
Kerr Lake-$31.8 million
$7,522million
RALEIGH $4,713 million
(50.5% retained)
RALEIGH $4,713 million
(50.5% retained)
All Other Basins-$2,809 million
$8,475million
RALEIGHWater Supply Benefits
ExportedIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
RALEIGHWater Supply Benefits
ExportedIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
Raleigh-$503 million
Hillsborough-$22 million
DURHAM$2,303 million
(50.2% retained)
DURHAM$2,303 million
(50.2% retained)
Chapel Hill-$500 million
Jordan Lake-$205 million
Kerr Lake-$16 million
All Other Basins-$1,033 million
DURHAM$4,057 million
DURHAM$4,057 million
DURHAM$4,590 million
DURHAM$4,590 million
South Granville-$7.2 million
DURHAMWater Supply Benefits
ExportedIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
DURHAMWater Supply Benefits
ExportedIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
RALEIGH-$296 million to Durham
DURHAMNet Imports of $349 million
HILLSBOROUGH-$23.2 million to Durham -$2.0 million to Raleigh
SOUTH GRANVILLE-$28.6 million to Durham -$0.2 million to Hillsborough-$17.3 million to Raleigh
SOUTH GRANVILLE-$28.6 million to Durham -$0.2 million to Hillsborough-$17.3 million to Raleigh
UPPER NEUSE BASINWater Supply Benefits
Net ExportsIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
UPPER NEUSE BASINWater Supply Benefits
Net ExportsIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
CHAPEL HILLNet Exports: -$191 million~83% from Durham
JORDAN LAKENet Imports: $841 million~50% to Durham~50% to Raleigh
KERR LAKENet Imports: $26 million~75% to Raleigh
UPPER NEUSE BASINWater Supply Benefits
Net ExportsIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
UPPER NEUSE BASINWater Supply Benefits
Net ExportsIn Terms of Annual Economic
Impact of Residents, 2006
RESULTS• Amongst Upper Neuse water systems, Durham
is a net importer of water supply benefits– Durham is a net importer of workers– These workers are supported by other cities’ water
supplies
• Amongst regional basins, the Upper Neuse is a net importer of water supply benefits, especially from Jordan Lake
Exports of Water Supply Benefits
APPLICATIONS FOR DECISION-MAKING• Reveals the interdependence of cities within
and near the Upper Neuse River Basin
• Helps visualize “virtual” exports of water resources
• Can inform negotiations and decisions– Intra- and inter-basin water transfer agreements– Joint financing of new water infrastructure
Exports of Water Supply Benefits
Conclusions
• Novel application of commute shed analysis
• OnTheMap can help analyze the exports of water supply benefits amongst cities, illustrating this “virtual connection”
• A versatile, easily-accessible tool to complement more costly research such as valuation and modeling analysis
COVER PHOTO CREDITS: traffic scene: A.F. Silva; Lake Michie aerial view: City of Durham