supplement defendant (sfi) state farm insurance in pike township small claims court...

8/14/2019 SUPPLEMENT Defendant (SFI) State Farm Insurance in Pike Township Small Claims Court 49k05-0904-Sc-2680 09j…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/supplement-defendant-sfi-state-farm-insurance-in-pike-township-small-claims 1/3

STATE OF INDIANA) PIKE TOWNSHIP SMALL CLAIMS COURT

) ss: CAUSE NUMBER: 49K05-0904-SC-2680

COUNTY OF MARION )

)

KAY KIM, )Plaintiff, )

)vs )

)SHANNON LAMPSA (LOVE), )KYLE LOVE, )STATE FARM INSURANCE, )

Defendants. )

FIRST SUPPLEMENT DEFENDANT, STATE FARM INSURANCE (SFI)

Comes now, the Plaintiff, Kay Kim, Pro Se filed FIRST SUPPLEMENT DEFENDANT,

STATE FARM INSURANCE (SFI) on this 9th day of June, 2009 as follows and not limited to:

1. State Farm Litigation Counsel’s involvement in behalf of insured who are the

Defendants – Shannon Love (Lampsa) &/or Kyle Love of this suit.

2. Insured Claim # is under 14-G041-688.

3. If the main floor is own and insured by the insured Defendants, they will do

anything to get property compensated and if not, they will take SFI to the Court for

compensation.

4. If SFI is not responsible for the damage in behalf of their insured, why State Farm

Litigation Counsel is representing them.

5. Though, I, Plaintiff, Kay Kim, Pro Se never read their contract, in light of SFI

litigation counsel’s representation and circumstances/efficient proximity and the cause of the

damages’ origin that I, Plaintiff, Kay Kim, Pro Se concluded to supplement SFI as a Defendant

of this suit stated herein.

0f 3

IN SM SUPPLEMENT 1st DEFENDANT SFI FOR DAMAGES 49k05-0904-SC-2680 09JUN09



6. With the SFI’s intentional substandard and fradulant estimates that I, Plaintiff,

Kay Kim, Pro Se request that the Court to hold SFI responsible for any damages caused/incurred

include which is/are not propery compensated for the damages.

7. The joinder of entity-SFI will not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction

in accordance with the law.

8. In the absence of entity-SFI, the court cannot accord complete relief amongexisting parties.

9. The enityt-SFI is an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated

that disposing of the action in the entities’ absence may:

9(a) as a practical matter impair &/or impede the Plaintiff’s ability to protect

that interest.

9(b) leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring double,

multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the interest.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 9 , 2009Kay Kim,4250 Village Pkwy c e Unit 2,Indianapolis, IN 46254T# 317-641-5977

Pike Township of Marion County Small Claims Court

5665 Lafayette R., Suite B, Indianapolis Indiana 46254

(317) 293-1842, (317) 290-8319 Fax

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the above and foregoing has been mailed to the following

by United States First Class mail postage prepaid on June 9, 2009.

0f 3




Daniel M. Whitte

State Farm Litigation Counsel

6640 Intech Blvd. Suite 210, Indianapolis, IN 46268, T#(317) 684-6161

_________________

Kay Kim, Pro Se

0f 3


supplement defendant (sfi) state farm insurance in pike township small claims court...

Documents