superinteligências - com vinicius soares - ainews
TRANSCRIPT
(c) Antonio Alberti, Inatel, 2014.!
VERY OFTEN, PEOPLE CITE MOORE'S LAW AS AN EXAMPLE OF LAW CAPABLE OF PREDICTING TECHNOLOGICAL
DEVELOPMENTS IN COMPUTING POWER.
Gordon Moore, 2004.
“THE QUANTITY OF TRANSISTORS THAT
CAN BE PLACED INEXPENSIVELY ON
AN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT HAS
DOUBLED APPROXIMATELY
EVERY TWO YEARS.”
(c) Antonio Alberti, Inatel, 2014.!
MORE RECENTLY, RAYMOND KURZWEIL PRESENTED A THEORY FOR TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION AND A NEW LAW THAT EXPANDS MOORE LAW TO DESCRIBE THE EXPONENTIAL GROWTH OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES
THE LAW OF ACCELERATING RETURNS
(c) Antonio Alberti, Inatel, 2014.!
KURZWEIL PRESENTED A SERIES OF FIGURES SHOWING EXPONENTIAL GROWTH TRENDS FOR MEMORY CAPACITY (DRAM IN BITS PER DOLLAR), MICROPROCESSOR CLOCK SPEED (HZ), TRANSISTORS PER CHIP, PROCESSOR PERFORMANCE (MIPS), MAGNETIC STORAGE (BITS PER DOLLAR).
“THE SINGULARITY IS AN ERA IN WHICH OUR INTELLIGENCE WILL BECOME INCREASINGLY NONBIOLOGICAL AND TRILLIONS OF TIMES MORE POWERFUL THAN IT IS TODAY—THE DAWNING OF A NEW CIVILIZATION THAT WILL ENABLE US TO TRANSCEND OUR BIOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS AND AMPLIFY OUR CREATIVITY.”
ACCORDING TO THIS BLOG, THE TERM SINGULARITY WAS USED BY THE FIRST TIME IN A JANUARY 1983 ISSUE OF OMNI MAGAZINE. “WE ARE AT THE POINT OF ACCELERATING THE EVOLUTION OF INTELLIGENCE ITSELF.”
SOME POSSIBLE PATHS TO TECHNOLOGICAL SINGULARITY
• SUPERCOMPUTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE • HACKING HUMAN INTELLIGENCE ON SUPERCOMPUTERS • SUPERCOMPUTING STIMULATED EVOLUTION • SELF-IMPROVING SWARMS OF MICRO/NANO ROBOTS • SELF-IMPROVING ROBOTICS • SELF-IMPROVING INFORMATION ARCHITECTURES • HUMAN-MACHINE CONVERGENCE
THE GOAL OF AI RESEARCH SHOULD BE TO CREATE NOT UNDIRECTED INTELLIGENCE, BUT BENEFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
INVESTMENTS IN AI SHOULD BE ACCOMPANIED BY FUNDING FOR RESEARCH ON ENSURING ITS BENEFICIAL USE: HOW CAN WE MAKE FUTURE AI SYSTEMS HIGHLY ROBUST, SO THAT THEY DO WHAT WE WANT WITHOUT MALFUNCTIONING OR GETTING HACKED? HOW CAN WE GROW OUR PROSPERITY THROUGH AUTOMATION WHILE MAINTAINING PEOPLE’S RESOURCES AND PURPOSE?
HOW CAN WE UPDATE OUR LEGAL SYSTEMS TO BE MORE FAIR AND EFFICIENT, TO KEEP PACE WITH AI, AND TO MANAGE THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH AI? WHAT SET OF VALUES SHOULD AI BE ALIGNED WITH, AND WHAT LEGAL AND ETHICAL STATUS SHOULD IT HAVE?