summer fun zone 2016 · 2017-07-12 · summer fun zone • 2016 was the third year that pint...

17
SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 Feedback from Parents/Caregivers and Youth Participants

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

SUMMER

FUN ZONE

2016

Feedback from Parents/Caregivers

and Youth Participants

Page 2: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Summer Fun Zone

• 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and behavioral needs and those on the Autism spectrum.

• Participants were 6 to 17 years old.

•The program ran for 6 weeks, 4 days/week at a local school in the town of Minden.

• The goals of the program were to provide:

-Activities and experiences matched to the interests and needs of youth.

-Opportunities for the development of life skills.

-Respite for families.

-A satisfactory summer experience for children/youth and families.

• The program was evaluated by administering a survey to parents/ caregivers and child participants so Point in Time can continually improve our programming

Page 3: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Response Rate

This year:

– 12 caregivers/parents

– 19 children/youth

– This is a response rate of 86.4% for children (response rate is difficult to determine for parents as they may have more than one child in the program)

Page 4: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

FEEDBACK FROM

PARENTS/CAREGIVERS

Page 5: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Overall Satisfaction

81.8% rated excellent18.2% rated Good When asked how satisfied their child/children were with program

58.3% rated excellent and 41.7% rated good when asked how satisfied they were with camps

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Child (n=11) Parent (n=12)

% o

f R

esp

on

den

ts

Response Options

Figure 1: Overall Satisfaction with Summer Fun Zone

Poor Fair Good Excellent

Page 6: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Usefulness

0

20

40

60

80

100

Poor Fair Good Excellent

% o

f R

esp

on

den

ts

Response Options

Figure 2: How useful were the following parts for your child?

Tme away from home (n=12) Time with friends (n=11)

Activities (n=12) Swimming 9n=11)

Event Days (n=9)

Page 7: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Aspects of Program

0102030405060708090

100

Poor Fair Good Excellent

Perc

ent

of

Res

po

nd

ents

Response Options

Figure 3: How would you rate the quality of the following

aspects of the program? (n=20)

Staff Registration Overall Programming Outside Agencies Programs

Page 8: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Changes Noticed in Child over

Summer

75% caregivers noticed changes, such as:

– Keeping busy/Burns off energy

– Self control/Self-regulation (also noticed last year)

– Confidence (also noticed last year)

– Patience

– Happy/likes program (also noticed last year)

– Respect

– Maturity

Page 9: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Program Fit and Communication

– 75% said “YES, DEFINITELY” program was a good fit (last year, 87.5%)

– 25% said “YES, I THINK SO” program was a good fit (last year, 12.5%)

– 60% said COMMUNICATION WITH WORKER was EXCELLENT (last year, 50%)

– 35% said COMMUNICATION WITH WORKER was GOOD (last year, 50%)

– 5% said COMMUNICATION WITH WORKER was FAIR

Page 10: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

No, Definitely Not No, Not Really Yes, I Think So Yes, Definitely

% R

esp

on

den

ts

Response Options

Figure 6: Return to Program (n=10)

Child Parent

Return to Program

• 90% said they would definitely recommend the program

• 9.1% said I think so

Page 11: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Open-ended Questions:What was good about the SFZ program?

“Supportive, excellent staff”

“Always fun things to do”

“the needs of the children are always taken into consideration”

‘”closing ceremony was a good idea”

“A chance for social interaction for a child with little social skills”

”the program was helpful with getting the kids together”

“very relaxed”

“it kept him on a schedule, his day was structured and had to follow

rules. He learned there were consequences when he didn’t”

“location was convenient for our family”

“transportation excellent-always on time”

Page 12: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Open-ended Questions:

What would make it better?

– “nothing, it was great.” (similar response x5)

– “more outside activities, less inside things like movies, etc.”

– “more details regarding the weeks events.”

– “…a few times where my son came home with some new words

& they were not nice. I know that it is hard to keep that from

happening but I just wanted to let it [be] known.”

– “more days a week.” (x2)

Page 13: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Feedback from Child/Youth

Participants

Page 14: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Rating Workers and Activities

Last Year:• 100% participants rated WORKERS

positively• 92% rated ACTIVITIES positively

• 100% rated WORKERS positively.

• 95.8% rated ACTIVITIES positively.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

% R

esp

on

den

ts

Response Options

Figure 7: Children's ratings (n=19)

How were your workers? How were the activities?

Page 15: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Open-ended Questions:

What did you like best about SFZ?

– Swimming (61.1%) (was also highest rated last year)

– Activities ( 38.9%) ( wii, fishing, science

experiments, baking and crafts)

– The People ( 16.6%)

Page 16: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Open-ended Questions:

What could make it better?

– More trips

– More swimming

– More Lego

– More days (x2)

– More things to do

– More activities

Page 17: SUMMER FUN ZONE 2016 · 2017-07-12 · Summer Fun Zone • 2016 was the third year that PinT offered the Summer Fun Zone program for local children with developmental, emotional and

Summary

– Summer Fun Zone program is highly valued by parents/caregivers and the children participating in it.

– Program staff and the activities offered in the program continue to be rated most highly by parents/caregivers and children.

– Recommendations included: more outside time, more details about the activities, more days per week, more swimming.

All feedback will be considered by Point in Time program staff and management to improve our services ☺