3200SSWD033 Z15408 BISLEY

SUMMARY REPORT010

ON

VLF-EM SURVEYMAGNETOMETER SURVEY

RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGICAL SURVEYA

IP PROFILE SURVEY

BISLEY TOWNSHIP PROJECT AREA (O.P.A.P. Initiatives)

F. P. Taollamonte Protect Area

by

Frank P. Tagliamonte , P.Eng.

JANUARY

1994

32D05SW0033 2.1S4OB BISLEY

CONTEN i01OC

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

PROPERTY

LOCATION

ACCESS

DATA ATTACHEDReport Pockets - #1 , #2 Appendix

GEOLOGY - Rconnaissance ReferenceTable of Formations Local Geology

WORK DONEReferencesPersonnel, Project Area, Work Period, GridControl, Geolgical Observations, VLF-EM SurveyingMagnetometer SurveySampling

RESULTS OBTAINEDGeological reconnaissance and Prospecting Geophysical Surveying - VLF-EM

- Magnetometer- Induced Polarization Profiles

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS

1

2

2

2

2

567

89

9

9

APPENDIX

Report on IP Survey by RJ.Meikel Sample and Assay DataTable of Lithologies - Bisley

Pocket* 1

1) MAP B 93 A2) MAP B 93-13) MAP B 93-24) MAP B 93-2A5) MAP B 93-36) MAP B 93-4

Index SketchReconnaissance Geology and ProspectingReconnaissance VLF-EM SurveyFraser Fitter Contours; Cutler, Maine(CM)Magnetometer SurveyMagnetometer Profile.Claim Boundary

Pocket # 2

1) Compilation Map No 12) Psuedosections: Line 'A'; Line 'B1

Summary Report

on

VLF-EM SurveyMagnetometer Survey

Geological Reconnaissance SurveyZ

l. P. Profile Survey

Bisley Township Project Area (O.P.A.P. Initiatives)

F.P.Tagliamonte Project Area

by

Frank P. Tagliamonte , P.Eng.

*****

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Reconnaissance VLF-EM, Magnetic and Geological surveying programs were carried out over a portion of a claim group in the northwest quadrant of Bisley township as shown on attached MAP B 93 - A. Two IP profiles were also completed over a portions of the project area where VLF-EM and Magnetic surveying had detected anomalous responses.

The essential thrust of the exploration work was to localize on the ground a series of circular +- airborne magnetic anomalies. IP profiles were completed to investigate and validate VLF-EM conductors. One claim line magnetometer profile was completed to check the margins of a circular airborne magnetic survey on an adjacent claim.

Reconnaissance prospecting operations were carried out by a two man crew on blazed, flagged and chained compass lines. Grid control was established simultaneously with geophysical survey operations.

Funding for a major portion of the exploration program was provided by OPAP.

Duplicate reports similar to this one have been submitted to OPAP in compliance with their requirements.

The exploration program was successful in localizing the airborne magnetic anomalies. They appear to lie along a geological contact between felsic *- and basic *- volcanics or diorite. A series of weak +- VLF-EM anomalies generally coincide with the magnetic closures. The anomalies are masked by overburden although outcrops are nearby.

IP profiling detected two anomalies adjacent, but not coincident with the VLF-Em anomalies.

Follow-up exploration programs including prospecting, IP surveying and perhaps mechanical trenching are recommended to investigate the specific anomalis detected during exploration investigations.

PROPERTY Tagliamonte Claim Group

LOCATION

Kirkland Lake Resident Geologists DistrictBisley TownshipLarder Lake Mining DivisionClaim Map # G3191NTS: 32 D 5Lat: 48 degrees , 23 min. +- ; Dep: 79 degrees , 27 min. *-NEast Quadrant of Bisley Township

ACCESS

The project area is readily accessible from Kirkland Lake a total distance of approximately 39 miles (63 km ).

The immediate project area is accessed by recently built forest access roads which connect to the Harker-Holloway road (Hwy # 672) approximately 11 miles (18 km ) to the East.

DATA ATTACHED

Report Pockets

Pocket #1

1) MAP B 93 A Index Sketch Claim Group Location b 1993Project Area Outline

2) MAP B 93-1 Reconnaissance Geology and Prospecting

3) MAP B 93-2 Reconnaissance VLF-EM Survey

3

4) MAP B 93-2A Fraser Fitter Contours ; Cutler , Maine (CM)

5) MAP B 93-3 Magnetometer Survey

6) MAP B 93-4 Magnetometer Profile ; W Boundary Clms: L-980240 ZL-980241

Pocket #2

1) Compilation Map No. 1

2) Psuedosections: Line 'A'; Line 'B*

APPENDIX

1) Report on l. P. Survey by Rayan Exploration Ltd.

2) Sample and Assay Data

GEOLOGY Reconnaissance

Reference: ODM Geological Report 103 ( GR103 ), Geology of Melba and Bisley Townships, District of Timiskaming by L. S. Jensen, 7973

General

The project area lies within a package of Blake River Group volcanic stratigraphy. The package includes intermediated and felsic (?) volcanics, tuffs, sediments (?), and basic intruslves.

Tgble of Formations

A photo copy of the Table of Lithologic units for Bisley township from page 4 , ODM Geological Report 103 is inserted in the appendix.

Local Geology

Geological observations made in conjunction with grid preparation and geophysical surveying indicate that the predominant rock types in the project area are intermediate

volcanics , most of which are identified from megascopic characteristics only. Some of the volcanics examined have not been differentiated precisely. The intermediate volcanics are variable in character but are predominantly either massive , locally amygdaloidal and frequently pillowed.

The northern portion of the project area hosts broad bands of lapilli tuff(?) , tuff breccia(?) or more popularly classified , hyaloclastite. The hyaloclastite is variable in fragment size and angularity. Most of the fragments are hard and rhyolitic. Contacts with adjacent volcanic units are very irregular but readily defineable.

Most of the brecciated units examined appeared to be flow type breccia although some may be pyrodastic(?). Top determinations are not certain but appeared to be south facing.

The central portion of the project area which lies generally along the bush road and is adjacent or associated with a generally east-west oriented magnetic anomaly contains fine granular rock units that may be confused with diorite but are probably granular volcanics. These rocks are closely associated with adjacent local exposures of massive and pillowed basalts.

One exposure of diorite was tentatively identified on line 45W near the base line. Rock chips are not magnetic however. A possible diorite dyke occurs in an outcrop on line 8+50E, 9N.

Sparsely disseminated (2?fc +-J pyrite and pyrrhotite mineralization was noted within outcrops on lines 8E, 6N A 56E, 10N. The line 8E mineralization is adjacent to an outcrop of dacitic(?) volcanics that contain patchy areas with laths and brecciated fragments of chlorite and chloritic material.

WORK DONE

References

1) Summary Report of VLF-EM Survey, Reconnaissance Geological Surveying, Prospecting 8. Sampling , Bisley Township Project (OPAP Initiatives ) by Frank P. Tagliamonte , P.Eng. A Frank H. Toews, Geologist, January 1992.

2) Summary Report on VLF-EM Survey, Reconnaissance Geological Surveying, Prospecting and Sampling, Bisley and Melba Township Project (OPAP Initiatives) by Frank P. Tagliamonte, P.Eng. 4 Frank H. Toews, Geologist, January 1993.

Personnel

Applicant - Frank P. Tagliamonte, P.Eng.Assistants - As listed in the respective survey category.

Project Area

Outlined on Map B 93 A - northeast quadrant of Bisley Township.

Work Period

June-November 1993 - intermittently

Work periods were governed by constraints imposed by weather, casual help availability and availability of contractors.

Grid Control

North-south, blazed and chained compass control grid lines with 100' interval flagged stations were established simultaneously during VLF-EM Surveying.

Grid line intervals were varied from between 200 to 800'*.

Total miles surveyed:northeast grid - 9.35 claim line - 0.50

9.85 miles

Geological Observations

Supplementary geological reconnaissance observations and preliminary prospecting were performed simultaneously with grid development and geophysical surveying.

Observations made are as recorded on MAP B93-1 and otherwise briefly described under the local geology section of this report.

VLF-EM Surveying

Instrument: Crone Radem VLF-EM Parameters: Dip Angle - degrees

Transmitters:

Reading Interval: Operator: Assistants:

Total ReadingsRecorded:Processing:

Out of phase -%0/f normal field SW , Seattle , Washington - 24.8 KHz CM , Cutler , Maine -17.8 KHz AM , Annapolis , Maryland - 21.4 KHz

100'F. P. Tagliamonte George Harkin Jim Forbes Mike Barette

352 + (check , repeat and out of phase readings not included) Fraser Fitter calculations - all lines and for each transmitter stations used. See Map B93-2A for CM (Cutler, Maine) transmitter station anomalies.

Three transmitter stations were used basically to assure that the VLF-EM survey could proceed even if the two preferred stations (CM A AM ) were shut down.

Dip angle and out of phase readings were taken and recorded at each 100' interval station along the grid lines, base line and tie lines in the project area.

Dip angle readings have been processed to yield Fraser filter numbers for each traverse. Map B93-2A portrays the contoured closures obtained from processing the CM readings.

Out of phase readings were booked but do not appear on the maps.

Grid control operations and some geological observations were carried out simultaneously with VLF-EM surveying. Magnetometer Survey

Instrument:Parameters:Base Stations:Operator:Assistant:Total ReadingsRecorded:

Documentation:

Scintrex MP 2Total ReidBase Line at each 100 intervalJim ForbesF. P. Tagliamonte

396( Northeast grid - 370 ) (Claim Line - 26) MAPB93-3

Sampling

Two (2) samples were collected for analysis during work on the project. Details are documented in the appendix under sampling. Sample locations are as indicated on MAP B93-1

RESULTS OBTAINED

Geological Reconnaissance and Prospecting : MAP B93-1

Significant observations appear to be the weakly mineralized daritic? exposure adjacent to line 8+50E, 6N and the local? patchy chloritic alteration in the intermediate volcanics outcrop west of line 12+50E , 5+50N.

There are no currently know geophysical features associated with these exposures except for a linear-like magnetic low that coincides with a topographic depression between outcrops within the outcrop area immediately north of the mineralized exposures and the chloritic alteration.

No detail prospecting has been done in this area

Geophysical Surveying : MAPS B93-2 . -2A .( EM ): -3 A - 4 ( Mag.)

VLF-EM

VLF-EM surveying identified seven (7) anomalous features signified by capital letters on the maps from 'A' to 'G' . These letters are subscribed with lower case 'em' designations and numbers to indicate the type of survey and the year surveyed.

Fraser filter anomalies for the (CM ) readings are signified in the same manner.

VLF-EM anomalies 'A' A 'B' lie along the base line and are likely part of one long linear anomaly. The anomaly is confirmed by results from readings obtained from three different transmitter stations. Rock exposures in the vicinity of anomalies are granular volcanics and possibly diorite?.

Anomaly 'C' is a northwest trending linear anomaly , confirmed by readings on two different transmitter stations , and may reflect a fault structure. The southeast portion of the anomaly may trend through or lies along the west edge of an outcrop of intermediate volcanics.

The remaining four anomalies have been detected by readings from two transmitter stations. They all lie within overburden areas. Anomaly 'E' has the appearance of a long

8

linear anomaly and may hence be deduced to reflect a possible fault structure.

Fraser filter processing of readings from the Cutler Maine transmitter confirm and accentuate the existence of all seven anomalies.

MAGNETOMETER

A dose control, tight closure magnetic survey was performed over the project area. The survey was designed to locate a series of low relief airborne magnetic closures over the project area.

Four (4) distinct magnetic closures were located in the portion of the project area covered. Anomaly 'A* was first located during a 1992 survey. It was re-surveyed during the 1993 field season and established as a local, generally circular magnetic anomaly. A VLF-EM conductor trends northwest through the magnetic anomaly. A Max-Min EM profile survey was run over the anomaly without significant result.

Magnetic anomalies 'A* , 'B*, and 'C* lie along a generally east-west linear horizon adjacent and along the base line over a distance of approximately one mile. All three may in fact be one continuous magnetic structure containing a series of local magnetic high closures. It is possible that the magnetic structure is open to the east.

The anomalies do not appear to overly areas of outcrop except perhaps for the northeast end of anomaly 'B' which seems to overty a gabbro exposure. Reid observations will have to be made to confirm this. The anomalies , nevertheless lie adjacent to several outcrops along the base line.

Magnetic anomaly 'D' appears to be centred on line 26E , 19N. It appears to be a broad , low relief anomaly that is undefined.

Magnetic low 'E' , located between lines 8E A 12+50E , 8N. It is located within a topographic depression between two outcrop exposures in elevated topography. No detail prospecting has been done on this feature. The anomaly appears to open to the west.

The magnetic profile along the west boundaries of claims L-980240 Z 241 was run to investigate a local circular airborne magnetic anomaly indicated to be present within a group of claims to the west.

The profile indicates two low relief magnetic peaks along the boundary of claim L-980241.

INDUCED POLARIZATION PROFILES

Induced polarization profiles were run over portions of lines 'A' and 'B* to investigate both magnetic anomaly 'A' and VLF-EM anomaly '92B'.

Induced Polarization anomalies were detected on both lines but neither coincide with the magnetic anomaly or the VLF-EM anomaly.

Prospecting the vicinity of the l. P. anomalies and perhaps follow-up Induced Polarization surveying appear warranted.

A summary of the Induced Polarization survey , including procedures, results and conclusions are documented in the appendix under INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Both magnetic anomalies and VLF-EM anomalies which lie along the base line appear to be coincident. Though some outcrops lie adjacent to the generally linear anomalous structure, one possible diorite outcrop is indicated to underlie the eastern extremity of the anomaly.

Rock exposures at the approximate centre of the coincident magnetic - VLF-EM anomalies are tentatively identified as fine granular volcanics. Diorite is a possibility but hand specimens tested are not magnetic.

The entire stretch of anomalous structure along the base line is indicated to be a prime target area for detail prospecting. Most of the area has been dear-cut by timber operators since the survey was completed and will thus provide easy access for prospecting, hand trenching or mechanical stripping in specific target locations.

A bedrock explanation for the airborne magnetic anomalies, now partially defined on the ground remains to be determined by detailed prospecting along the anomalous structure.

Magnetic anomaly 'E' is bordered by outcrops and is a target area for detail prospecting , hand trenching or mechanical stripping to explain it's cause.

VLF-EM anomaly 'C' is also a target area for detail prospecting, hand trenching, or mechanical stripping. An outcrop near it's southeast end may be dose enough to provide information on it's cause.

RECOMMENDATIONS

10

The following recommendations are made to further investigate magnetic, VLF-EM and Induced Polarization anomalies within the 1993 project area.

1) Detail prospect and hand trench accessible portions of:a) I.P. anomalies - lines 'A' and 'B'.b) Coincident magnetic - VLF-EM anomalous structure/s ('A', 'B' and

'C') along the base line.c) Magnetic anomaly 'E'.d) VLF-EM anomaly 'C'.

2) Mechanical strip defined target locations indicated to be of follow-up interest by favourable results (mineralization, anomalous assays) from prospecting and hand trenching activities.

3) Perform Magnetic , VLF-EM and I.P. Surveying operations in unexplored areas that are indicated to require these methods to extend known or suspected mineralized structures.

Respectfully submitted,i

Frank Pxn"agliamonte;p.Eng. January 1994

*********

APPENDIX

1) Induced Polarization Survey Reports

2) Sample Data and Analyses

lINDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

A limited IP. survey was conducted on both the Bisley Twp. property and the Cairo Twp. property. Two lines were surveyed on each property for a total of approximately 2km.

The purpose of the I.P. Survey was to test a VLF conductor on each property detected by F. Tagliamonte, to see if the conductor had a bedrock source and to test same for sulphide mineralization.

It should be noted that the existing grids on both properties are chained in imperial units with 100 ft. picket intervals. This was not known by the contractor who had dipole wires chained in metric with 25m intervals. The lines were simply re-chained in metric and tie-points to the imperial grid are shown on the I.P. Psuedosections. This did not present a problem and care was taken to plot the VLF Conductor Axis in the right place with respect to the current metric chaining.

General IP Theory

The IP method involves applying voltage across two electrodes in a pulsed manner i.e. 2 seconds on, 2 seconds off. A second "dipole" or electrode pair, measures the residual potential or voltage between them after the voltage is shut off or during the 2 second off cycle. The potential is recorded at different times after the shut off. If, for example, there is sulphide mineralization within the measuring dipoles, they will be polarized or charges set up on the sulphide particles. This polarization gives the zone a capacitor effect, thereby blocking the current delay giving a higher chargeability reading.

A typical signature for many gold showings would be a chargeability high, resistivity high and magnetic low. This would be characteristic of a mineralized, highly altered carbonated and/or silicified zone. However, this is by no means the only geological setting for gold, therefore every profile should be looked at individually and correlated with all other geophysical-geological data.

Electrode Array

The electrode array used for the survey was the Dipole-Dipole Array. In this array two current electrodes (C1, C2) and two receiver or potential electrodes are moved down a line in unison. In this case the "a" spacing or distance between each dipole was fixed at 25 meters apart. For an 1^1=1 reading, the closest C1 and P1 were 25 meters apart. The C1-C2 dipole remain in the same place while the potential dipole (P1-P2) moves ahead one "a" spacing and the array is ready for an 1^=2 reading, etc.

M

IP Survey

The IP survey was carried out using the following parameters:

Method: Time DomainElectrode Array: Dipde-Dipole"a" spacing: 25 metersNumber of Dipoles Read: 1-4Pulse Duration: 2 seconds on, 2 seconds offDelay Time: 500 millisecondsIntegration Time: 420 millisecondsReceiver: EDA IP-2Transmitter: Scintrex IPC-9, 200 wattData Presentation: Individual Psuedosections

Plate-1, Bisley Twp. Property Plate-2, Cairo Twp. Property Plan Map No.1, Bisley Twp. Property Plan Map No.2, Cairo Twp. Propert

I.P. SURVEY RESULTS

BISLEY TOWNSHIP PROPERTY

Two lines, called Line 'A' and Line 'B', were surveyed by the current I.P. Survey. The bearing of these lines is N45W with the parts NW of station 0+00 labelled north in the field and on the psuedosections. It should be noted that while the lines are parallel, station O+OO on each is not normal to the other because the 0+00 point on each is on an EW baseline from another grid.(see plan map no.1, back of this report)

The purpose of the I.P. Survey was to test a VLF conductor on L-A/aoOmn and L-B7400mn, previously detected by F. Tagliamonte. The VLF conductor appears to have a coincident resistivity low on each line but no coincident chargeability response. On both lines the VLF conductor is on or near an assumed geological contact between a resistive unit and a conductive unit to the north. It is proposed that the source of the VLF Conductor is current channelling along this contact and as such it appears unlikely that the conductor has any associated sulphide mineralization.

The above assumed contact may in fact be a fault zone. Although there is not presently sufficient information to corroborate this, the topography and outcrop

Illobserved by the author strongly suggests this.

More significantly, there is a good chargeability I.P. anomaly on the south flank of the above assumed fault/contact? zone on both lines centred at L-A/S/mn and L- B/SSOmn, with the response on L-B being the strongest. The anomaly lies in a moderate to resistive unit and as such would not be expected to have a VLF response which is the case. This anomaly is open to the north-west and south-east The response is typical of disseminated sulphides. However, the possibility of a dyke exists and should be tested with a magnetometer survey and field mapping next summer. There is insufficient I.P. Survey coverage to determine if the two zones are related.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The following conclusions and recommendations are based solely on the limited amount of I.P. Survey done and limited geological/geophysical information available.

BISLEY TOWNSHIP PROPERTY

While the VLF Conductor does not appear to be mineralized, a strong I.P. response was obtained on the south flank of the conductor on both lines. It is strongly recommended that the source of the I.P. anomaly be explained by trenching and or drilling if the possibility of a dyke is reasonably ruled out by a magnetometer/mapping survey. If the results are encouraging, the anomalous horizon should be delineated along strike by an additional I.P. Survey on 50m spaced lines at the same bearing of N45W. Coincident with this survey, the rest of the property should be surveyed with I.P. on more widely spaced lines. This would appear to be warranted by the discovery of a previously unknown I.P. Chargeability anomaly and possible fault zone.

CERTIFICATION

'. I, Raymond Joseph Meikle of Timmins, Ontario hereby certify that:

1. I hold a three year Technologist Diploma from the HaUeybury School of Mines, Hai leybury, Ontario, obtained in May 1975.

2. I have been practising my profession since 1973 in Ontario, Quebec, Nova scotia. New Brunswick, Newfoundland, NUT, Manitoba, Germany and Chile.

: 3. I have been employed directly with Teck Corporation, MetalIgessellschaft Canada Ltd. Sabina Industries, .S. Middleton Exploration Services Ltd., self employed 1979-1985 (Rayan Exploration Ltd.) and currently with Rayan Exploration Ltd.

'4. I have based conclusions and recommendations contained in this report on knowledge of the area-, my previous experience and on the results of the field work conducted on the property during 1993. , ,

5. I hold no interest, directly or indirectly in the Bisley Township or Cairo Township properties of Mr. P. Tagliamonte, nor do I expect to receive any interest or considerations from either property, other than professional fees for services rendered.

Dated this 20th day of December,1993 at Timmins, Ontario.

R.J. Meikle

s? o* i rv P i f-

z c

^ 2-

^ S'^

ll'

8 fe

w

GA •t? S l

01 g r -o

ACCURASSAY LABORATORIESA DIVISION OF BARRINGER LABORATORIES LIMITED. REXDALE. ONTARIO

BOX 426 --KIRKLAND LAKE. ONTARIO. CANADA P2N 3J1

TEL.: (705) 567-3361

President: Dr. GEORGE DUNCAN. M.SC.. Ph. D., c. o*m lOm.i. c. o*m IU.K.I. M.C.I.C.. M.R.S.C.. A.R.C.S.T.

47412 Certificate of Analysisr r r

Mr. F. TagJiamonteGeological Engineering Service29 Beaver CrescentNORTH BAY, OntarioP1A 3N1

Page i

August 12

SAMPLE NUMBERS Accurassay Customer

930927930927

B93-1 B93-1

Gold ppb

6 <5

Work Order i Project

Gold Oz/T

930088

<0.001 <0.001

93

Check

r r ir

iWCAip^

l IF/ ^^VM* \ lu /CHARTERED\ ̂ )

[z Dr.G.Duncan * l^V CHEMIST "

ORIGINAL

Established 1928

Swastika LaboratoriesA Division of TSL l ASSAYERS INC.

Assaying - Consulting - Representation

fissay Certificate

FRANK P TAGLIAMONTE

3W-2457-RA1

Dale: SEP-15-93

We hereby certify the following Assay of l ROCK samples submitted SEP-13-93 by.

Sample NumberB93-2

Au PPB

31

Au PPB27

CuPfM100

Zn PFM

81

VRA

Certified by

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK1TO Telephone (705)642-3244 FAX (705)642-3300

FRANK P TAGLIAMONTE

3W-24S7-M1

TSL/ASSAYERS Laboratories1270 P

CWSTM DRXVC.

UNIT 3 HXSSXS8AUOA.ONTMXO

L4U-1A4 PHONE

li (416)625-1944

PAX li (416)206-0513

I.C.A.P. WHOLE

ROCK ANALYSISLlthlua Hotoloroto Fusion

•trout MO. i M2801

P*go Mo.

t l ol l

Pi lo Mo. i M17M

Dato t

SIP-13'1993

MHPLI l•102

A1203 Po203

*

: t

*

C*0HgOt

Ma20K20

T102t

tHnO*

.P205l

•rPP*IrPP*

Y PP"•o

bOX *

TOTAL

•93-255.51

14.10 10.72

5.13 t.23

2.03 0.06

0.64 0.13

0.10 65

125 156

50 33

5.02 91.M

APPEN O IX

Table of Lithologic Units

Melba 8. Bisley Twps*

Photo Copy Excerpt:

ODM Geological Report 103Geology of Melba and Bisley Townships.Distrit of Timiskaming

Melba-Bisley Townshipspage4

Table 2 l TABLE OF LITHOLOGIC UNITS MELBA AND BISLEY TOWNSHIPS

CENOZOIC

BECENT

Peat, alluvium

PLEISTOCENE

Gravel, sand, silt, varved clay

Unconformity

PRECAMBRIAN

ARCHEAN

LATE MAFIC INTRUSIVE MOCKS

Quartz diabase (dikes)

Intrusive Contact

FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

Hornblende diorite, monzonite porphyry

Intrusive Contact

EARLY MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

Gabbro, quartz gabbro, hornblende gabbro

Intrusive Contact

FELSIC VOLCANIC ROCKS

Pillow lava, flow breccia, pyroclastic rocks

INTERMEDIATE VOLCANIC AND SEDIMENTARY ROCKS

Massive lava, pillow lava, flow breccia, pyroclastic rocks, argillite

MAFIC VOLCANIC ROCKS

Basalt, andesite, massive lava, pillow lava, flow breed*

SCALE: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS

MITO 1000 3000

O 200 MMTNiS II KMI U KM l

MAP B 93 - A

INDEX SKETCH

CLAIM GROUP LOCATION4

1993 PROJECT AREA OUTLINE,

F* P* TAGLIAMONTE PROJECT AREA INITIATIVES

BARNET TWP. THACKERAY TWP.

. 15408"•••l••••1 1186150 l bKBpHBili

j x . i ' 'l '/' l

1186648 1—1-%-h 186165 ^"- C^n y

\ Y' 4 \ ' ',\\J t t I T ^ J t /-k^ XTW/V'^v .^-1 , . l * . . X

9^A2^4 i MA^Mft.^' 'x! x*^j^^ *H**V^T—v-^—- —.—U l L l

•18612 JM . M.M9 !,_____|*W|lfc- K4**0 l

j?*****1 **fr**0B ^BB ••f — - ~ ——J .••••*

l" ^

it^UJ?^^

\ IV i L•~-i *118(5257x^

4., r -jurrsrjf r|y**4tt if**M(Tt""^!t—

U-/53

G-3I9IBISLEYM.N.R. AOMIMISTRATIVE DISTRICT

KIRKLAND LAKEIM 11C DIVISION

LARDER LAKELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

COCH" .NE

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mb** Act

NO.9480*

l IntomMion ootocltd on Ms loim to oMalmd imoW ta Mlhofly of houM b* olr^lMl lo m* PnMnctol Ittnspir. MMng Lamto. MMtHy ot NoithOT CHxtopm^H and Mhin. Fourti Floor. 158 Cmltf Sir**.

Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. Mtophono (706) 670-7264.

mstructlone: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations tor

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be oomph- Technical reports and maps must accompan- A sketch, showing the claims the work is as:

ft. 15408

32OOSSW0033 2.1540S BISLEY900

P. Cteni No.m^-.. /famshlpATOMMhlp/AlM M or O Plan No.

To:(ifrea^ dcrfcz;

m 3 .Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only (W

WorkGroup Type

geotechnical Survey der7T

^iisgWork,

inducing DrMing JOther Authorized Work f -.

'

gjrtft-Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs S -^———Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit an or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded

holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)

tf^^k^Blfll^k^^l^k^ 4McenniDMion of

CertHlcatkm of Work Report. h^tng p+rtomud tho woffc orA ponoral hnowtodQ0 of th*9 fKts MI torth in fhto Worti

to companion and anfUMd report b true. Name amt Addrasa of Person Certifying

For Office Uee Only

02*1 10*911

sl

tf

r

ofc-H

55s

o\

ff

\x Y

g

K c-C

1 Credits you are claiming m this report may be cut back. In order to minimize :ie adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from ; which claims you wish to prionze the deletion of credits Please mark (^ ?-e of the following:

1. G Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, work.-ig backwards.

2. G Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in the -eport of work.

3. G Credits are to be cut back as pnorized on the attached appendix

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.

Note 1: Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option ag'eements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:

l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest m the patented or leased land ai me time tne worn *ai

^.a - --e Date

-J•s;Northern Development and Mines

M Ve duDv pement du Nordei*.

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

t tat des coOts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur les mines

- obiss l' -- -- -~- .—J

Personal1 information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim's) Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presenfe formuto son! recuettsenvertu ae la Lol aur le* mine* et serviront a lenir a jour un registre des concessions -nmieres. Adresser toute question sur la collece de ces renseignemenis aj chef provincial des terrains mmiers. ministers du Devetoppement s. Nord el des Mines. 159. me Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P36 6A* telephone (705) 670-7264

1. Direct Costs/Couts directs

Type

Wage* SaWres

Contractor'sand Consultant'sFee*Droit* de( entrepreneuret de rexpert-conaeM

SuppH**U**dFoumNure*utm****

Rental Location de iiaterlel

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvre

Field Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Typ*

rv

Amount Montan!

AVo

Total Direct Costs Total de* cout* directs

Total global

tlc: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed m this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work aN or part of the assessment work submitted.

2. Indirect Costs/Couts indirect** * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work. Pour ie -emboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les coils -oirects ne soot pas admissibtes en tant que travaux d'evai~aiion.

Type

Transportation Transport

Description

Typ"# TTfriYc

Food and /y-r-xr,1 fM^nfasB *f CJ" ^— """

Nourrtture et kf&f&t.

MobSbatlon and DenioMHietioii

Amount Montani

ft/5"-

/f fy ' fr~

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partM des coOts Indirect*

Amount Allowable (rot greater than 20* of Direct Costs) Moment admissible - excedant pea 20 H des couts directs)

Total Value of Assessment Credit Valeur Male du ere* (Toui or Direct end AJowaM* d'svatuatton Indlrecl ca*Ul fToM AM codta dbKH

Totals Total global

Zfc~

Ml*

/^P/^•l-r9S^'

Note : Le Muiaire'eRrsgistre sera tenu de verifier bs depenses demandees dans le present eta: Des couts dans les X jours suivant une demande 4 eel effet Si la ver'cation n'est pas erfecluee. le ministre peut rejeter tout ou une panic oes travaux d'evaluation presentes

ing Discounts Remise* pow depdt

Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 10tWb of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

l. Les travaux deposes dans tes deux ans suivant leur achevement soot remboursesa100*n delavaleurtoialesiJsrrierMiomeaducrerJld'evahation.

Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at SOto of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

at Value of Assessment Credrt Total Assessment Claimed

x 0.50

2. Les travaux deposes trois. quatre ou cinq ans apres tour achevement sont rembourses a 50 46 de to valeur totato du credit d'evaluation susmerrbonne. VOJT tes ceJcuts ct-dessous.

Valeur total* du credit Z evaluation

x 0.50

Evaluation Male demande*

-lineation Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des coats

reby certify:the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs i incurred white conducting assessment work on the lands shown he accompanying Report of Work form.

as(Record** Holder Ag*nl

ake this certification

l am authorizedn Company)

J'atteste par la pres-e--te :que les montants iroiques sont le plus exact possible ei que ces depenses ont ete en^agees pour effectuer tes travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains mdiques dans la formute de rapport de travail ci-joint.

Et qu'a litre de ___________________ je suis autons6(Muuire nregis-* -*pr*sentanl. post* oecup* dans l* oompagru*)

d faire cetie anesta: :*

Sgnat.'e i Dale

Noia i~s ce::e (c'm

Ontario^—————.—B Approval i*

Ministry of Mmistere du 933 Ramsey Lake RoadNorthern Development Developpement du Nord 6th Floorand Mines et des Mines Sudbury, Ontario

P3E 6B5

tsust; x

September 20, 1994 Our File: 2.15408 Transaction #: W9480.00255

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development 6 Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sir/Madam:

Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ON MINING CLAIMS L.980240 ET AL IN BISLEY TOWNSHIP

The 45 days specified in the Notice of Reduction dated July 21, 1994 have passed.

Assessment work credits have been approved as outlined on the attached Assessment Work Credit Form for the submission. The credits have been approved under Section 12, Geology, and Section 14, Geophysics (Mag fi VLF), Mining Act Regulations.

The approval date is September 6, 1994.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Lucille Jerome at (705) 670-5855.

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division

LJ/IJ Enclosures:

cc: Resident GeologistKirkland Lake, Ontario

l/AS!ssessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario

ASSESSMENT WORK CREDIT FORM

FILE NUMBER: 2.15408

TRANSACTION NUMBER: W9480.00255

DATE: September 20, 1994

RECORDED HOLDER: Frank P. Tagliamonte

CLIENT NUMBER:199715

CLAIMNUMBERRESERVE

98024011863371186153

VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK DONE ON THIS CLAIM

881350770

2208

VALUE APPLIED VALUE ASSIGNED TO THIS CLAIM FROM THIS CLAIM

711846651

2208

O504 119

O O O

RlPlRiMCM

t t

TWP

-^. - . . j 1186130 L. . - -, ,.Nv i^-^^r•'

THACKERAY TWP.Tt* M1 M*

*- — r?

?aaArVW

s -,, , —— IL.,i... to xl'*- 1

1

w r

BM." " 4** II 1 41"

•M,

l yt -w.

1186165 r- - r ~1186646 H- - - - -

^- - ~ -—* * i" - T - "r - -4 - - — - JT

1166479iw^p^r^ i..t.-

1186681"""-v. j__r.

1186460

118^435 *""\

l 1166438iN86463 j.1180227 V

INFORMATIONON THIS MAP 1200111HAt

rWi^AND AOWMCV m NOT

tlMM •MOULD CON- 1186258

l /T—^**^i l w*. J-.!"0"0!"0^. s(jiptsij^^. i ^ .'J*

JMMMLU WINH mCOPY Of THIS MYUAH AMCHVCO NOV M/W

MORRISETTE TWP

LiOCW

HJOHWAV AND ROUTf M*. OTHf H HOAMTflAILI ttlRVCYEO LINIi:

TOWNIHIPt. ftAK LNM, ITC.LOTt, MINING CLAMM, PA**LI. ITC

UNIUIIVIVIO LINft:LOT LINItPARCfLIOUNOAHVIM^^V^^^VB *PW^^*^^NW W f ""

RAILWAY AMO RMHT OP WAYUTILITY LIMflNON+CRINMtALlTRIAMPLOOOINO OR PLOOOMO RION71lUIDIVIMON ORpllURVATIONtORM1INALIHOIIILINIMARtHORMUtKIQMINI!TRAVf RN MONUMENT

lAIOI

MTIMT, llfflFACI * IfNINQ WOMTt " , lUWACf ftpHTt OKLV., " , MIMIMO IIIOWTIONLy.^...

LIAM, MlflFACff ft MlfNHP R*4WTI..

L^IMCf OF OCCUPATION

^^B^^*^ ' ̂ ' ^*m

CANCfLUID••••••^••(^^^•'^•••••^b*******

.N0TI: MININQ HIONTS IN f ANCfMl ^ATINTIO MIOM TO MAV f. 1(19. VMTtp IN OHIOIN/H. fATfNTti fV THI -

HITO 1000 MOO

O 940li KM) (t KM l

COPY OF THIS MYLAR ARCHIVI ON JULY 17/92

T^WMIMIP

BISLEYM.M.H. APHIillTRATIVI DIITKICT

KIRKLAND LAKEJHilM IVIIION

LARDER LAKELAND TITUI/ RIIIITIIY KvillON

COCHRANE

MinMryofNltUTj)

ir.nch

G-3191

'* ,H

, p,,4f***

,iN

J1 ' v

act

\

"~x

-O-

- fe-

SU)CM Catter M*iiie WfcA

. MSS

C*

5

* O a. *-

t^

CM

i 6

l

o ^

4 /!

r 4 3t

o c

u

30 eo

30

li-

i K,

ri

i 5"

S i

ftl

s a

fe 9

i/v

6

10 l

;/ *

o i

O ** ^

\ r-'

C i

K* o 13 /i •5" /c

l fl '

i virA * ^ ac— a- t — . — f ——— I S /b i"* so gi

/iff

iiab /o

-

.* a

FtMtft

3 l

i 30f'

^^ ..

S w CH

i*

af

e*

2 -L

C 2.

3 2.

/o '75"

C 4-

r l

i 2 a-

/e. tt

\ f

A?-

CN *

U 4

r J- i* //i ^41

•a

a

T

, A

.0

4-

•ei

* O

ll

2- 1& 408

400 e*)*?*

.1iicH

C

V L F E K SURVEY

Ultft*

l l

fi

Ir*

wott

avu

:

y^.ul d-

ft

s

1U*2SQl

aa o

SUSxlau.

i

UJ

,..,it , 4

4" J

-0

*

l!'

/.:

b'0

y

Vi/

(VJODO

o *-o

t

O

*rJ

PE

.IfcE

W i)o-

R A:P. i o in

A-nv cs

199?: OPA? FUNDED/

ARLA4O

Otoo

800 ft

32DO

5SW

0033 Z'5

4O

8 B

ISL

EY

240

PLATE l OF 2

I.R. SURVEY

BISEEY TOWNSHIP

: 1250

Not.. 0 arid * B* Foot

or. I P on pr*w i l

SON 75N l5pN ttfH __25pN 27^N

M3 CHO.Nil 2-0 .0

Ni2

3-0 .1.0 .0 2.0

• O

M3 CHO- NU

Nt2

Ni3

Ni4

27SN t 30DN

l RESISTIVITYNil 13.6K

Ni2

Ni3

Ni4

3.3

RESISTIVITY NH

Ni2

Ni3

esa .SK Ni4

LINE :

INDUCED S

DIPOLE-

iN r 1

•H' 8PRCU

RX-TX TIMIND 2 DELAY TINE OH INTEDRATION TIM

l- . IR

199

BISLEY TOWDflTE : NOV. 1993

SCRLE

RRYRN EXP

"A"

SURVEY

JIB

J?LDEPTH POINT

IP-2 TINE DOMAIN

REF :

r. . ff tr,

on inp grid

7^N JQpN

M3 CHO.

3 lB26.n - ISHft n

aid imperial eh*i

.25J1N 375N 4 SOpN

lty

Nil 4.0

Ni2 4.0

Ni3

Ni4

RESISTIVITY

5(^N

Nil 3B5.5 278. 4 .158-1

Ni2 466. B

336.6

386.

l.0 1.0 l.0 -O l .0

-O

l .0

.0

-1.0 \ l.0 1-0

M3 CHO. Nil

Ni2

.0 Ni3

.0 Ni4

357.7 209.0 274-2 204-6 209.8O O ^

Ni4

4.4K 30. ?K 23-8K 48-BK

29.2 383-829. BK I2-7K15. 7K 28.

3 5^4 729.fl-"-' 920.3 540-55K 28-2K

\ .2K \ 776-2" 0 0 0 'l rm \

RESISTIVITYNil

Ni2

N'3

I -bK Ni4

32DOS8W0033 2 16408 BISLEY 250

LINE : 'B'

INDUCED POLRRIZRTION SURVEY. 15*08

DIPOLE-DIPOLE RRRRY

OIPTHN - l. 2. 3. 4. ...

*B' 8PRCINO - 25.0 METRES

RECEIVER BROH IP-2 TIME OOHAIN

RX-TX TtNIND 2 9EC ON 2 BEC OFF

OB.AY TIME BH MILLISECONDS

INTEGRATION TIME 421 MB. HIMXM 9 OF 4

F . TRCrl IRMONlf

1993 OPRP

BISLEY TOWNSHIP. ONTRRIODRTE : NOV. 1393 KEF :

SCRl K l : 12b() .0

RRYRN txpi imni ION lin.

. 15408

CLAIM POST

CLAIM LINE

VLF COND AXIS

ROAD

I P ANOMALY

D

F TAGLIAMONTE

BISLEY TOWNSHIP

PLAN

COMPILATION MAP NO l

32D06SW0033 2 16408 BI8UEY 260

t*st

lac*c:

L~U 66335

\,

r^S

*. r\ji 3 p

^-r

\A/

5L *"

- ^

u ^

ISia-

-*n-

I N k C C EIft

XX\x' ^

^

^

9r

O^

\3

-Si-

st e

^. l^i

V^

^}

6"'

0590V3 9-65)04-

MA

-eiH

MA

^CH

/^(k

:iT^pj-*

Bit

t^f^

c

lan

AV

*

IV D

ociht,

H^.

-

^P

1ZG

O lit

Sv f',~

-

itf'>'•>

"i^

/rv

f

l

PlV. *

*

• (̂^^—

f-

' V

^**^

V a^

-

l?vr

^0

*i*^C

.

ftlk.

L fYu ^1

j t

, ^4

"

t,*- - v

-j f* f-

B/c

^,p

ry?

^

* *

t X

J

* IV D

ac^c

XJ^'Cl^v

, 4^

L- 1166*34

v^ J*

J*\ r

f*

. **

felt

ib.-,pf ^^ ?

, f JC ^

1^7.

^. ^,

r^

-^ir^-z.

.5408

32DC

5SW0033 2.1S4O

B BISLEY