summary report mamainse mine property mcdonell …€¦ · copper from the area. records very...

41N02SE0107 8.14060 RYAN 010

SUMMARY REPORT

MAMAINSE MINE PROPERTYMCDONELL MINING LOCATION

BATCHAWANA ONTARIO

sault Ste. Marie, Ontario April 10, 1991 R oy^yO . 'R|G#e r t, /P. En g

RECEIVED

APR l 7 1991

MINING LANDS ShCl ION

JFP0406.R

41N02SEai07 2.14860 RYAN 010C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I,0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS l

2.0 INTRODUCTION 2

3.0 PROPERTY LOCATION, ACCESS AND LOCAL RESOURCES 3

4.0 OWNERSHIP AND TITLE 3

5.0 HISTORY 4

6.0 CURRENT PROJECT 6

7.0 GEOLOGY AND MINERALISATION 6

8.0 SAMPLING l

9.0 SELF I^ITIAL SURVEY - 8

'lO.O INTERPRETATION 9

II.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10

12.0 REFERENCES 10

13.0 CERTIFICATE 11

Figure JFP91-1 Figure JFP91 -2 Fiqure JFP91-3

Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C

Appendix D

Location planSample Planself Potential survey

Time sheets and work logsAssay records, certificates, invoicesDescription of Self Potential method afterDobrin (1960)List of selected anomalies

SUMMARY REPORT

MAMAINSE MINE PROPERTYMCDONELL MINING LOCATION

BATCHAWANA ONTARIO

1.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1.1 This report describes the prospecting work carried out on 13 mining claims owned by Mr. Jeffery F. Paquette covering the former Mamainse Mine. This work was completed in 1990 and 1991 using OPAP Grant No. OP90-495.

1.2 Gold is present in some samples from the Lutz Vein in significant quantities. This vein and others in the area should be reviewed as possible polymetal 1ic copper and precious metal prospects.

1.3 The SP method successfully located known mineralisation, as well as some new anomalies. Compared with the failure of most other geophysical methods used in the past/ this is very encouraging. It is recommended that the survey be extended over the entire grid and that lines 17S to 21S be resurveyed.

1.4 Anomalous zones located by this'"survey should be prospected closely by conventional methods, followed by mechanical stripping or drilling as warranted.

1.5 The property consists of 13 unpatented staked claims on the A. McDonell Location of the Quebec and Lake Superior Mining Company near Batchawana, Ontario.

1.6 The Mamainse Mine on these claims was operated from 1882 to 1884, with 3 shafts and 4 levels to depths of at least 320 feet. An adit was also driven on the Lutz Vein at some time. Production records are unavailable.

1.7 The Coppercorp Mine was operated on the property immediately to the south from 1955 to 1972, mainly by North Canadian Enterprises Limited, a company controlled by J. P. Sheridan. Mine workings extended for over a mile of strike length. Mr. Paquette's claims are only 1400 feet north of and on the northern strike extension of the Coppercorp Mine workings. Reliable production records for the Coppercorp Mine are unavailable, particularly with regard to production of gold and silver. They were the subject of acrimonious dispute between Coppercorp and North Canadain Enterprises. During the period from 1955 to 1972, the operators of the Coppercorp Mine conducted some exploration of the subject property, including diamond drilling.

1.8 Evidence from the current prospecting program Indicates that there are significant gold values associated with the mineralisation. Assays for gold on 12 samples produced gold values between l and

JFP0406.R

i")'!'. MI-:I i nh.-'" i"'.f 'i|.".'J '- v h t - i.* O J'V i'^Mf i.

7.19 grns/tonne gold from 8 of the samples. The best gold assay was from a sample with only Q.06%- copper, while a sample with 45,G^ copper contained only 0.72 gms/tonne gold. Previous records have never documented gold grades for the Mamainse Mine nor the Coppercorp Mine. It is concluded that renewed exploration of. this prospect is warranted, with close attention to the distribution of precious metals.

1.9 Mineralisation consists of a variety of. primary minerals in veins and fault related stockworks including calcite, quartz, fluorite, primary chalcocite (the principal ore mineral), bornite, chalcopyrite, native copper and native silver. Gold and silver values are apparently associated with copper values, but are independently distributed. Parts of the Coppercorp Mine were richer in silver than others, and the current sampling work on the Mamainse Mine property does not indicate uniform copper:gold ratios.

1.10 This report documents the location of samples taken in the course of prospecting this property.

1.11 A self potential survey was conducted to trace the fault and breccia zone prospects located by prospecting. Results of this survey are documented. Responses are weak, and some of the data are poor, but the method does locate areas with better mineralisation, and several additional prospective targets are defined. Specific anomalies are listed for further exploration.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 This report is prepared at the request of Mr, Jeffery F. Paquette to summarise work completed on his property during the past year. It is intended to serve as a report to meet the requirements of his Ontario Prospectors Assistance Grant, asessment work reporting requirements, and to aid in promoting the .property.

2.2 The writer has inspected and reported on this property at numerous times since 1970, for the Ontario Government and for shareholders of Coppercorp Limited, the owner of the mining rights prior to 1980. In the early 1980's, the writer was the holder of claims over the same area as Mr, Paquette's current claims. This report is based on personal knowledge, the writer's filcu compiled from a variety of sources, and examinations of trenching recently completed by Mr. Paquette.

2.3 The writer recently examined the official records of the claims atthe Recorder's office, and examined the surface rights deeds atthe Registry office some years ago.

2.4 The writer has relied on field notes and records of SP survey notes supplied by Mr. Paquette. Samples referred to In this report were taken and sent to Wawa Assaying by Mr. Paquette.

JFP0406.R

f li o one

l i J ALKALii'C PLUTON s

2~] UAfIC PUUTONS

KEWtlNAW C P.y olconic ft i *dlm*nloiy 11 f of o

Hooliiol ft

C t,K4 o bf oo k

NEOHELIKIAN IGNEOUS ROCKS AND MINERAL DEPOSITS OF LAKE SUPERIOR. (After Annels, GSC Bull. 218)

J E F Fm X .. F..,. .P.AQ U E T T}?.

RJR, jyyi"G4-iu JFP91-1

Mti ma i ML. e j-'i: vy|.)0r t-y Ki.-[.io.' ;, P c* M c 3

3.0 PROPERTY LOCATION, ACCESS AND LOCAL RESOURCES

3.1 Figure JFP91-1 shows the property location and the claims owned by Mr. Paquette.

3.2 The property is located on the east shore of Lake Superior and is crossed by the TransCanada Highway, Ontario Highway No, 17, The nearest source of supplies is the city of Sault Ste. Marie, about 60 miles to the south.

3.3 The claims are crossed by an existing industrial electric transmission line constructed by the Great Lakes Power Company to serve the Coppercorp Mine. Water is available from Lake Superior, or in limited quantities, from small creeks which cross the c l a i ms .

3.4 The property is covered by a mixed St. Lawrence type of forest, with maple, birch spruce, cedar and poplar predominant. The mining rights do not include timber rights.

3.5 There is an existing 500 ton per day copper concentrator on the adjacent Coppercorp Property. It has been abandoned since 1972, on a care and maintenance bets.is. Much of the equipment has been salvaged for use elsewhere. An existing tailings disposal area is located there.

4.0 OWNERSHIP AND TITLE

4.1 The property consists of 13 unpatented claims as shown on Fig. JFP91-1. They are numbered as follows:

Claim Numbers Recording date

SSM 1064139-148 inclusive Jan. 16, 1989 SSM 1078952-954 inclusive Jan. 16, 1989

4.2 The claims are located in the District of Algoma in the Sault Ste. Marie Mining District of the Province of Ontario. They are within a pre-confederation mining location comprising ten square miles, not included in any formally defined geographic township. This loation is known as the A. McDonell Location of the Quebec and Lake Superior Mining Company. For administrative purposes, the Ministry of Nat ut ji Resources and the mining recorder often include it with Ryan Township. The area is within the Soo North Planning Area and is subject to some zoning controls.

4.3 The claims are in National Topographic System (NTS) Area 41N/2.

4.4 The claims are unpatented staked mining claims held under the usual provisons of the Ontario Mining Act. No assessment work has yet been reported on them. There, is enough asessment credit, available to restore most of them to good standing.

JFP0406.R

4.5 Surface rights to these claims are held by Belco Timber. The terms of severance by which the surface rights were deeded to the first separate surface rights owner establish the mining rights as the. eminent domain, and specifically reserve access, entry and working rights to the miner without payment of compensation. The fact that this is originally a mining location also tends to confirm that mining rights are the eminent domain. In the late 1970 "s, the mining rights were forfeited for taxes and reverted to the Crown. It is possibly a contentious legal question whether the rights of the miner survived the forfeiture and restaking.

4.6 These claims are recorded solely in the name of Mr. J, F. Paquette, Box 145, Bruce Mines Ontario, POR ICO. The writer is advised that Mr. Paquette has granted unrecorded interests as follows, in return for work done.

5* to W. Longchamps, 169 John St., Sault Ste. Marie, ON. 35* to M. Lumme, same address

4.7 The parts of this property near the shore of Lake Superior are in an area where the sensitivities of environmental activists are easily aroused.

5.0 HISTORY

5.1 The history of this prospect can be summarised as follows. {Shlanka, 1969)

Pre-historic Pits and trenches by aboriginal tribes for native copper.

circa 1680 Prospecting and mining by Alexander Henry for the Northwest Company.

1842-1848 Mining Locations surveyed for Montreal Mining. Company and Quebec and Lake Superior Mining Association.

1848-1852 Prospecting, shaft sinking and some production of copper from the area. Records very spotty.

1882-84 Mamainse Mine developed by the Lake Superior Native copper company. 3 shafts to 60, 280 and 320 feet beside Lake Superior. Stamp Mill, townsite. No production record. Lutz adit possibly driven at this time. No production records.

1947-53 9 diamond drill holes by Macassa Mines and/or C. C. Huston and Assoc. Geological mapping from this period published by Thomson (1953) is best available and last detailed mapping of the area.

JFP0406.R

i ri y t Jr'i ope 'f. \. y K c pi 1 1 i. i-'ciqc b

1955-72 Exploration and production by C.C.Hustori, Coppercorp Limited (owner), and North Canadian Enterprises (leasee), on three contiguous mining locations of 10 square miles each. Extensive diamond drilling, surface stripping, underground development and mine production from 500 ton per day concentrator. Most work was done on a 1000 acre lease to contractually limited depth of 1000 feet. Lease was located immediately south of the subject mining claims.

1968-1969 14 diamond drill holes on subject property, locations poorly documented.

1972 Coppercorp Mine closed following acrimonious and litigatJous dispute between owner and leasee regarding production accounting. Published production (N. Miner Handbook) 1,129,247 tons. Copper production not published since 1969. Reported production between Oct. 1965 and Dec. 31, 1969 was 624,625 tons with a mill head grade of 1.46* copper. Copper recovery was reported to be 96.42*. Production records do not mention gold or silver. Concentrates were sold offshore, mainly in Europe. A former assay office employee advises the writer that gold and silver values in concentrates were high. The writer's efforts, as resident geologist for the Ont. Dept of Mines at Sault Ste. Marie in 1970 to 1973, were unsuccessful in accessing information about gold and silver production from government statisticians,

1972 Profitability of the operation from 1965 to 1972 is very difficult to evaluate in the absence of production records. North canadian Enterprises is a tightly held company which does not publish meaningful operational statistics. No royalties or profits were paid to the owner. In 1987, one of the major shareholders was unable to access meaningful production data.

1972-1980 Controlling shares of Coppercorp Limited held by J. P Sheridan interests and Campbell Chibougamau Mines Limited. Sheridan interests paid taxes on the leased area, Camchib and Coppercorp were unable to pay taxes on outlying locations. The A. McDonell Location was forfeited for taxes.

1981 The writer staked the area of the current claims. Unable to promote this prospect in a period of low copper prices. Claims lapsed.

JFP0406.R

;. s --'- , . - '- r dye O

1989 Claims staked by Jef.fery F. Paquette who applied for an OPAP Grant to prospect in 1990. Completed cleaning of trenches, new stripping, sampling and SP survey.

6.0 CURRENT PROJECT

6.1 From Aug. 1990 until the present, Mr. J.F. Paquette has conducted an exploration program consisting of

Conventional prospecting14 man-days of manual stripping trenching and sampling.47.3 km. of linecutting26.6 km. of SP surveying19 samples were analysed for copper, gold and other metals.

Detailed logs and time sheets for this work are attached as Appendix A.

6.2 Figures JFP91-2 and JFP91-3 show the locations and results of the sampling and prospecting work and of the linecutting and SP surveys respectively. Appendix B contains assay documents.

7.0 GEOLOGY AND MINERALISATION "^^ '

7.1 The regional and local geology is described by Giblin and Armbrust (1973), Annels (1972) and Thomson (1953). The reader requiring detail is referred to these publications and maps.

7.2 The property is underlain by a sequence of about 9000 feet of NeoHelikian basalts and interflow conglomerates deposited in the Lake Superior Rift Basin about 1250 million years before present. These flows unconformably overlie the older Archean granite and greenstone basement and dip homoclinally at about 30 degrees west towards Lake Superior. The flows and underlying basement are intruded by younger (1100 to 1030 Ma) felsic intrusives, some of which are mineralised by copper or other metals. Some mineralisation in the area is clearly genetically associated with these younger intrusives, and ali of the local copper mineralisation is suspected to be associated with them.

7.3 Copper mineralisation occurring in the homoclinal basalts is associated with defined fault systems, most of which strike about 160 degrees azimuth and dip steeply east. Mineralisation may occur as well defined veins in these faults wjth widths up to 20 feet, or as disseminated metallic and sulphide mineralisation extending for tens of hundreds of feet laterally from them into fractured basalts or permeable conglomerate horizons. Some chalcocite mineralisation is found in amygdules in both basalts and in felsic porphyry intrusive rocks. Intersections of faults and splays or dogleg sections of faults are favourable locales for copper mineralisation. Mineralised veins located to date favour

JFP0406.R

H'.4ill'.l .i i'K.'C l J O p L' i i.- }' r''.'j.".!j l j'oJLjf.' l

sections with relatively competent basalts amenable to brittle fracture .

1.4 M ineralisation in the veins and fractures includes calcite, quart?. and laumontite as common gangue minerals, with subordinate fluorite. Ore minerals include native copper, chalcocite, bornite, chalcopyrite, pyrite and native silver. The principal ore mineral is chalcocite, which is found to depths of at least 750 feet and appears to bcj primary, as opposed to a secondary weathering product. Large l to 2 inch zoned crystals or masses of chalcocite surrounding and replacing bornite which in turn surrounds and replaces chalcopyrite are often found in ore. Quartz veining, sometimes drusy, often accompanies rich ore. Native copper occurs sparingly particularly near the old Mamainse Mine. Native silver was present in places in the Coppercorp Mine, erratically distributed. Locally a few large masses of native copper up to 75 feet long were found in the Coppercorp Mine. They were not recoverable in mining operations.

7.5 Veins of chalcocite up to several feet wide were encountered in the Coppereorp mine, producing a pronounced nugget effect with local patches grading more than 25 times the mine average grade.

,this sort of material is difficult.

7.6 At the Lutz Vein and at the old Mamainse Mine, veins on surface consist of solid stringers of chalcocite 1/2 to 4 i nches wide which extend several tens of feet in trench exposures. Analyses of samples of these veins produce results as high as 45% copper inrecent sampling.

7.7 Mineralised veins and outcrop in the area are generally poorly exposed. The basalts are often friable rotten rock so soft they are amenable to hand trenching in bedrock. Conglomerates are porous and more recessive. They weather freely and are usually covered by vegetation. Evaluation of fault structures in shallow exposures is d'ifficult.

8.0 SAMPLING

8.1 Fig. JFP91-2 shows sample locations and significant results. Appendix B contains copies of assay certificates, summaries of assay results and invoices for assaying.

8.2 The most significant results are the high gold values encountered in some samples taken from trenches near the road on lines 15 to 17 South. Samples were prospectors grab samples selected by Mr. J. f. Paquette . Gold values up to 0.2 oz./s.ton were encountered here in samples of weakly mineralised siliceous and carbonate veined rock. Gold values occur with copper mineralisation, but certainly are not proportional to copper grades. The gold values appear to be distributed quite differently from copper values.

JFP0406.R

9.0 SELF POTENTIAL SURVEY

9.1 Because of the fractured porous nature of bedrock in this area, geophysical methods do not have a good track record of finding mineralisation. The relatively small volumetric amounts of chalcocite in mineralised structures makes them a difficult geophysical target in the best of circumstances, but the noisy background from the amygdular basalts and associated porous conglomerates make::, anomaly recognition more difficult.

9.2 An SP survey was selected as the method of exploration by the operators because of the shallow overburden locally, the utility of the method for tracing mineralised sulphides, and the reputed simplicity of operation.

9.3 The survey was begun on cut lines on Oct. 9 and 10 using a somewhat antiquated Sharpe V.P.6 voltmeter unit with analog dials and porous pots. Results were suspect and problems were encountered with the pots. Work resumed later in December. The voltmeter was replaced with a modern Micronta electronic millivoltmeter and the porous pots were replaced by simple copper tube electrodes driven into the ground. Care was taken to maintain metallurgical and electropotential symmetry in designing and connecting the electrode assemblies. Most of the survey was completed using this unit.

9.4 Fig. JFP91-3 shows the conventions used and the configuration of the electrode pair, as well as the results presented on a 1:2500 scale plan. Directions of travel are shown on the plan. The operators were careful to maintain the same configuration throughout the survey.

9.5 With the equipment and conventions used, the operator recorded elevated positive readings as the electrode pair approached a weathering sulphide concentration, and he recorded negative values as it departed from that area. The instrument array apparently measured the potential of the rear electrode relative to the forward one, rather than the reverse which is the more common convention. See sketch on Fig. JFP91-3. Anomalies have been interpreted on the plan using this simple model. Appendix C outlines the theory of the method.

9.6 Because the electronic millivoltmeter in use was not specifically designed for measuring low voltages in restive media, it lacked the very high internal impedance usual in instruments designed for SP surveys, and therefore tended to load a small positive voltage across the terminals. Internal resistance of the instrument was listed as a high 15 Megohms rather than the extremely high 100 Megohms recommended for SP surveys. As a result, most readings are in the 2. 0 to +2.S millivolt range. The operator advises that this voltage was independent of the sense of hook-up, so it was not created hy electrode polarisation.

JFP0406.R

9.7 The east part of line 16S was surveyed in opposite directions on Jan. 6 and 8. The results compare well, with the expected inverse profiles relating to the opposing directions of travel. This indicates that the system was essentially sound.

9.8 Lines 17S to 39+50S were surveyed in December with the Sharpe instrument. Lines 19 and 19+50S were resurveyed in January for comparison with the Micronta electronic instrument. Initially porous posts were used for a few days with the Micronta voltmeter. The comparison is not good, and the January Micronta data from the first days when this Instrument was used show an improbable skew towards large negative readings with no corresponding high positive readings. This appears to indicate that there was some instrumental problems which make the data for lines 15 to 2CH50S dubious. Subsequent data on other lines appear to be good.

10.0 INTERPRETATION

10.1 Anomalous responses matching the model described in section 9.5 are highlighted on Fig. JFP91-3. Several of these responses show significant persistent linear character and these should be prospected carefully to determine their cause. Selected anomalies are listed in Appendix D.

10.2 The known Lutz Vein trend has several sporadic anomalous responses, including a very strong one in the creek just north of the adit. this should be investigated further, particularly because of the gold values found associated with this trend. Initial testing should consist of careful location and mapping and sampling of all old trenches and exposures. Testing for grade by a series of shallow diamond drill holes is recommended if gold values are found to persist.

10.3 Several rather broad zones of erratic response are shown on Fig. JFP91-3, These may represent brecciated zones of low grade mineralisation. Confirmation of the cause of these anomalies by prospecting should be attempted.

10.4 The SP method clearly produces anomalous reponses where expected. The method should be used to extend coverage to the entire property. Better results might be obtained by using a long wire on a reel to measure all points relative to a few central stations. This would probably produce more readily interpreted contourable results than the leapfrog method used in this survey.

10.5 In the eastern part of the claims, there are numerous discontinuous weak responses which coincide with the area underlain by conglomerate. It is unlikely that these weak anomalies are associated with mineralisation, but the possibility should not be ignored completely. They may be associated with wet swampy ground.

JFP0406.R

a i 1'K.H- i-:r i.)pe j i y K^puri. Paqe 10

10.6 Anomaly I corresponds to a cross fault mapped by Thomson and Giblin where it transects conglomerate. In the Batchewana area, these faults have not proven to be mineralised. The anomalies des i gnated Anomaly J may have ci similar cause as they coincide with a c luster of similar mapped cross faults. As noted in paragraph 9.8, they may be instrumental anomalies rather than SP anomalies .

10.7 Anomalies A through F are probably related to mineralised veins. By analogy with favourable structural locations in the Coppercorp Mine, Anomaly B at line 20S/4+50W is a particulary attractive target. Anomalies C, E , and F appear to be new previously unidentified occurrences, although they are short structures.

11.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

11.1 Gold is present in some samples from the Lutz Vein in significant quantities. This vein and others in the area should be reviewed as possible polymetallic copper and precious metal prospects.

11.2 The SP method successfully located known mineralisation, as wellas some new anomalies. Compared with the failure of most othergeophysical metijod^ used in the past, this is .very, encouraging.It is recommended that the survey be extended over the entire grid

; and that lines 17S to 21S be resurveyed.

11.3 Anomalous zones located by this survey should be prospected closely by conventional methods, followed by mechanical stripping or drilling as warranted.

12.0 REFERENCES

ANNELS, R.N.1972: Proterozoic Flood Basalts of Eastern Lake Superior: The

Keweenawan Volcanic Rocks of the Mamainse Point Area, Ontario;Geol. Survey Canada paper 72-10.

DOBRIN, M. B.I960: introduction to Geophysical Prospecting; McGraw Hill, Toronto,

pp. 342-345.

GIBLIN, P. E,, and ARMBRUST,G.A.1973: Batchawana, Algoma District; Ontario Division of Mines Map 2251,

1:63560, colored.

SHLANKA, R.1969: Copper, Nickel, Lead and Zinc Deposits of Ontario; Ontario Dept.

Mines Mineral Resources Circular 12./ PP- 45 and 57.

THOMSON, J. E..1953: Geology of the Mamainse Point Copper Area; Ont. Dept. Mines

Ann. Rept., 6,2, pt. 4, 25pp., map, colored.

JFP0406.R

j.H 1 j '..j, r- i.: j.! C-1 i i' ci y's' j j.

13.0 CERTIFICATE

The writer, Roy J. Rupert certifies that:

My address and place of business is 28 Welcome Avenue Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.ario P6A 5A5 Ph. (705) 759-3347

I am a professional engineer registered with Assocation of Professional Engineers of Ontario. Registration No. 40084014.

I am a graduate from McGill University in 1966 with the degree M.Sc.(App) in the mineral exploration program.

l am a graduate from Queen's University in 1963 with the degree B.Sc.(App) in geological engineering.

I have practiced my profession as a geologist for over 25

I have prepared this report for Mr. J. F. Paquette,

I have no interest in the Mamainse Point Property, and I do not expect to receive any.

April 10, 1991Roy/J

(y

JFP0406.R

APPENDIX A

TIME SHEETS AND WORK -LOGS TO ACCOMPANY REPORT OF WORK MAMAINSE POINT PROPERTY MR. JEFFERY F. PAQUETTE

JFP0406.R

CLIENT

fr h f L4-ft*^ ST.

TE DESCRIPTION OF WORK

5 .s. .M isJOB NO. OR NAME

DAYS

TTt

6/v f.

-C

r"

32.

TOT/XL

MONTHLY WORK SHti.1

*N ' "S ft '-^ r i

CLIENT M* n fi til SE M

(- '.J l^ V MONTH js~( J^

h 11

VTE DESCRIPTION OF WORK JOB NO.OR DAYS

^

i '

o6

/y

,*vn 5*5

/t?

j 3

" ' H- tf- ! f 77"

TOT.AL 2 *

MONTHLY WORK SHEET

ifft

•^ rt.CLIENT n rj ; s r M x A/

./Cn? j~~*Hfit .ST. -s.s. Mg-rctc1 T\fMP*L.MONTH ..b^^c hA.fi.ir r;

^'•(•N. 4ak~- 3 "14 - i^ATE DESCRIPTION OF WORK JOB NO.

OR NAMEDAYS

*S K g'/T7/^ ttfiM

^ Wfr

te'c/9/fr

•o

TOTAL

CLIENT A/ fa

,, /?. MONTH

•-•X/.fv).

g r-*,^^ / y V /

JATE DESCRIPTION OF WORK JOB NO.OR NAME

DAYS

^s>x, S./. ffp yJ

,t i'

±, t 5"

9

e TOTAL

CLIENT

-y y.?TE'DESCRIPTION OF WORK JOB NO.

OR NAMEDAYS

u X

Oto/ff/fr .r

TOT.VL

MUNJ.HL1 WUKK

CLIENT

.l.)ATE DESCRIPTION OF WORK JOB NO.

OR NAMEDAYS

5

•fl/0

t

/y* '

//S'

/•r

(0 9

TOTAL

r-

ff

APPENDIX B

ASSAY RECORDS, CERTIFICATES AND INVOICES

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT OF WORK ON MAMAINSE POINT PROPERTY MR. JEFFERY F. PAQUETTE

ASSAY RECORDS


Sampling from August 1990 to December 1990.

SAMPLE NO,

1120111202112031120411205

1120611207

11208112091121011211

11212112131121411215

1.1216112171121811219

Copper Gold Si ^ oz./ton Oz

0.2979 0 0.1824 0 0.5940 0 0.4950 0 0.4188 0

Semi-quantitative ICP Ditto

0.32 0.0006,. 00.

45.14.

35.2.

11.28.

28.0.0.0.

21645

85404515

606328481

000

0000

0000

.0007

.0214

.1095

.0128

.0625

.0358

.0484

.186

.210

.218

.211

000

0000

0000

Iver Zinc Lead Nickel ./ton ^ \ ^

.178

.089

.0296

.0296

.0593

Spectrometric, see certificate

032 ,.,.^ ,^...052.117.227

.108

.131

.350

.160

.110

.056

.095

.053

00

0000

0000

.0021

.0239

.0051

.0245

.0158

.0140

.0169

.0301

.0336

.0144

00

0000

0000

.0027

.0044

.0022

.0031

.0022

.0030

.0032

.0032

.0034

.0251

00

0000

0000

.0009

.0047

.0016

.0064

.0030

.0031

.0040

.0081

.0079

.0041

JFP0406.R

WAWA ASSAYING INC.P.O. Box 1998 - Wawa, Ontario POS 1KO - 705-856-4443 127 Mission Road Fax - 705-856-2902

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISNO. 08207

CLIENT: M r. J . F. Paquette

PROJECT: MAM

TYPE OF ANALYSIS: Au - fire assay, AA finish

DATE: March 22, 1991

Ref: MR22-PAQ-734

Copper - A.A.

SAMPLE NO.

Au ppb

Cu ppin

11208

11209

11210'

11211

. M' 20

23

720

.63690

1212

'11213

11214

11215

430

2105

1205

1630

11216*

11217

11218

11219

28600

630

2800

4810 o

Certified By:

Wi WF l ^m Wf wr H^vk

ASSAYING INC.P.O. Box 1998 - Wawa. Ontario POS 1KO - 705-856-4443 127 Mission Road Fax - 705-856-2902

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

CLIENT: Mr. J. F. Paguette

NO. 08088No. 6793

DATE: January 24, 199]

SAMPLE No.

Zn ppm

Pb ppm

Ni ppm

11210

11211

11212

11213

11214

11215

21

239

51

245

158

140

27

44

22

31

22

30

9

47

16

64

30

31

Samples, Pulps and rejects discarded after two months.

Assayer:;

WAWA ASSAYING INC.P.O. Box 1998 - Wawa. Ontario POS 1KO - 705-856-4443 127 Mission Road Fax - 705-856-2902

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISN0- 08056

No. 6768

CLIENT: M r. J . F. Paguette MAM Project

DATE: January 18, 1991

SAMPLE No.

Au oz/Ton

Ag ppm

Zn ppm

Pb ppm

Ni ppm

11216

11217

11218

11219

0.186

0.210

0.082

0.211

3.7

1.9

3.2

1.8

169

301

336

144

32

32

34

251

40

81

79

41


Assayerf

Wr wF f^k ffff Wff P^Qi

ASSAYING INC.P.O. Box 1998 - Wawa. Ontario POS 1KO - 705-856-4443 127 Mission Road Fax - 705-856-2902

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

CLIENT: Mr. J. F. Paquette

NO. 09693No. 6417

DATE: December 5, 1990

SAMPLE No.

11208112091121011211

1121211213

^1215

Ag ppm

1

1

4

7

3

' ; ' ^f'-'-- 4

' 12

.5

.1

.8

.0

.8

.7

.5

.0

.5

Ag Cu oz/Ton ppm

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

032

052

117

227

108

131

2&Q.

160

3070

2120

45.6000

144500

358500

^ 5 23980

S-.***-* 281500

Cu Si

0

0

45

14

35

2

11

28

.31

.21

.60

.45

.85

.40

.45

.15

^oi*^-^ ^^^2r^— "s*** *^^ffytdt


Assayerr

Ministry 01 OntarioNorthern Development Geologicaland Mines Survey

77 Grenville Street 11th Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W4

Ontario!

^f^Sui

P.O.BOX 799

CO&ALTi ONTARIO F'OJ ICO

GeoscienceLaboratoriesReport

FOri: J.F. Paquette

P.O. Box 145

Bruc.e Mines, Ont.

FOR ICO

QUALITATIVE ICP-SP/CTROMETRIC ANALYSIS

ELEMENT/SAMPLE MAM11206

ALUMINUMBARIUMBERYLLIUMCALCIUMCERIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLANTHANUMLEAD ,MAGNESIUMMANGANESEMOLYBDENUMNICKELNIOBIUMNEODYMIUMPHOSPHORUSSTRONTIUMTANTALUMTITANIUMTUNGSTENVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOT. RADIO.(TOTAL RADIOACTIVITY

MHT-

M---

LMHT

,-

LTL-----

L--

H-T--T-

EXPRESSED IN EQUIVALENT 2 URANIUM OXIDE)

LEGENDH * 10 TO 1002MH s 5 TOMLMLTLT

:-. l TO 52= 0.5 TO 1 7.^ 0.1 TO O, S/.'s 0.05 TO 0.12= 0.01 TO 0.052

- = -','0,012 (NONE DETECTED)CHRIS RIDDLE. CHIEF ANALYST

Except by special permission reproduction of these results must include any qualifying remarks made by this ministry with reference to any sample.

1270 (86/10)

Ministry 01 OntarioNorthern Development Geologicalnd Mines Survey

77 Grenville Street 11th Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W4Tplenhnne 9RF.-1337

beoscienceLaboratoriesReport

Y T , T , L .

P.O.BOX 799

COBALT , ONTARIO POJ .ICO

FOR: J. F. Paquette

P.O. Box 145

Bruce Mines, ONtario

FOR ICO

f

9

QUALITATIVE J CP-SP/CTROMFTRIC ANALYSIS

ELEMENT/SAMPLE MAM1120?'

m T

MH

M

MH T T L M

LM

ALUMINUMBARIUMBERYLLIUMCALCIUMCERIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLANTHANUMLEAD,.., ... :^i,, ,'Y..U.;.I,MAGNESIUMMANGANESEMOLYBDENUMNICKELNIOBIUMNEODYMIUMPHOSPHORUSSTRONTIUMTANTALUMTITANIUMTUNGSTENVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOT. RADIO.(TOTAL RADIOACTIVITY

LEHHNDH = 10 TO 1002MH s- 5 TO 102M - l TO 52LM * 0.5 Tt] 12L * 0 .1 TO 0.52TL ^ 0.05 TO 0.12T -'- 0.01 TO 0.052- = ^tO.Ol/i (NONE HETtCTED)

EXPRESSE.D IN EQUIVALENT 7. U RANIUM OXIDE)

CHRIS RIl'iDl.Ei CHIEF ANALYSTExcept by special permission reproduction of these results must include any qualifying remarks made by this ministry with reference to any sample.

1270(86/10)

f

WAWA ASSAYING INC.

.0. Box 1998 - Wawa. Ontario POS 1KO - 705-856-4443 27 Mission Road Fax - 705-856-2902

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 1966CLIENT: MR. J.F. PAQUETTE

No. 5904

DATE: September 25, 1989

SAMPLE No.

11201 1/,

11202^11203S/

H2QA^/

11205 '11205 check no chrg

Ag ppm

631122

Cu ppm

297918245940495041884144


Assayer:./

j?/0si/v7

• ; - rV f

:'W'

WAWA ASSAYING INC.P.O. BOX 1998,127 MISSION ROAD,

WAWA, ONTARIO POS 1KO (705) 656-4443 FAX (705) 856-2902 .- -. .

WAWA ASSAYING INC. P.O. BOX 1996,127 MISSION ROAD,

WAWA, ONTARIO POS1KO (705) 856-4443 FAX (705) 656-2902

* 'l .^ PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTIONi WITH YOUR PAYMENT'

STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT

SIAlfMtNl DATf

03-27-91ACCOUNT NO.

86

Paquette, Mr. J, F. P. O. Box 145 Bruce Mines, Ontario FOR ICO

STATEMENT DATE ACCOUNT NO.i AMOUNT REMITTED

DATE PAID

03-27-91

(F PAYING BY INVOICE - PLEASE CHECK INDIVIDUAL INVOICES PAID

12-17-90 12-31-90 01-21-91 01-24-91 03-27-91

28862909293529392963

Invoice Invoice Invoice Invoice Invoice

28862909293529392963

lillie. 95

current,

WAWA ASSAYING INC.P.O. BOX 1998.127 MISSION ROAD,


SOLD 1 0:

Faquette, Mr, J, F. P. O. Box 145 Bruce Mines, Ontario FOR ICO

SHIP TO:

INVOICE

N0 02963

DATE: 0 3-27-91

PAGE: l of l

ITEM NO. QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE

COMMENTS:

GST# R105596860

Gold Analyses, AA Finish

Copper Analyses

Goods And Services Tax

. Thank you| for your patronage!

-l-

WAWA ASSAYING INC.P.O. BOX 1998.127 MISSION BOAD,


SOLD TO:

Paquette, Mr. J, F. P, O. Box 145 Bruce Mines, Ontario FOR ICO

SHIP TO:

INVOICENO.: 02939

DATE: 0 1-24-91

PAGE: l Of l

Trace Level Geochemistry Zinc Lead Nickel

COMMENTS:

GST# R105596860 Thank you for your patronage!

WAWA ASSAYINQTiNC. P.O. BOX 1998.127 MISSION ROAD,

WAWA, ONTARIO PO|tfKO (705) 856-4443 FAX (705)||k-2902

SOLD TO:

Paquette, Mr. J. F, P, O. Box 145 Bruce Mines, Ontario FOR ICO

SHIP TO:

INVOICENO.: 02935

DATE: 0 1-21-91

PAGE: l of l

OUANtllY IMSCUII'IION F l P l UNIT PKICE

\,

4

44 44

4

1

i

I J

Gold Analyses, Fire Assay

Trace Level Geochemistry SilverZinc LeadNickel

Sample Preparation

GST

(I1SK!IIi

COMMENTS: -.-^

GST# R105596860 Thi&ik you for your patronage!

i

8.500

2.0002.0002.0002.000

3.000

&'l ?'^^^v - :

83.46

'•V*

WAWAASSAYINGlNC.P.O. BOX 1998.127 MISSION ROAD,


SOLD TO:Paquette, Mr. J. F,s P, O. Box 145 ^f Bruce Mines, Ontarip FOR ICO ^

SHIP TO:

INVOICENO.: 02886

DATE: 1 2-17-90

PAGE: l Of l

Silver Analyses

Copper Analyses

Sample Preparation

2.000

2.000

3.000

Thank You for using the services of Wawa Assaying Inc.!

QUANTITATIVE ASSAY oFEE SCHEDULE 1989 7 SOGEOSCIENCE LABORATORIES,

ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STEMISKAMING TESTING LABORATORY

Precious Metals by Fire Assay Fee Coupons!. - (per determination)

Gold (Au) 13.00 1Silver (Ag) ' 12.00 1Gold 4 Silver (same sample) 17.75 2

Precious Metals - Geochemical DeterminationGold^Au)Sllvef\(Ag)Platinpm (Pt)Pallajailum (Pd)Gold, Platinum A Palladium (same sample)Others Copper (Cu) Nickel (NO Lead (Pb)

Cobalt (Co) . Molybdenum (Mo) Arsep(4(As) Chromium (Cr) Moisture (HjO)

. '.:if\'. - .'-i,-;.-":- - . .. .v- 1 .-. ,v.* ' -•••••'ti" ~ ' quantitative 27 element package'l

11.5011.2520.0020.0028.00

11.2511.25

.11.2511.2511.25

14.25.,, 1 0.50

223

111ti i22

MECHANICAL BULK SAMPLING vCf; TEMISKAMING TESTING LABORATORYStandard Mesh Size FEES (per pound) 14 jnesh - 7.50 centsOther Mesh Sizes (on request only)4mesh 5.00 cents

20 mesh 8.75 cents 40 mesh 9.50 cents 60 mesh 10.00 cents Minimum charge Is 5150.00

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Geocience Laboratories 77 Grenville Street Torohto, Ontario M7A 1W4 (416)965-1337

,'Temiskamlng Testing Laboratory Presley Street, Box 799 Cobalt, Ontario POJ 1CO (705) 679-8313 or 679-8455

Ministry ofNorthern Development

Ontario and Mineso Rene Rxilaine. Minister o( Ncxlhem Oevelc(xneni

Sean Conway, Umisier ol Mines

WAWAASSAYING INC.5.O. Box 1998 - Wawa. Ontario POS 1KO - 705-856-4443 127 Mission Road Fax - 705-856-2902

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISNa 1966

No. 5904

CLIENT: MR. J.F. PAQUETTE DATE: September 25, 1989

SAMPLE No.

11201112021120311204

•1120511205

Ag ppm

631

•- . V: 1- :,,,',,,., -'-a,^^' 2 i

check no chirg 2

r{^rZ ir-Z? /~e7~?2 t-sZ. ^ //^ *-— —————— —

Cu ppm

297918245940495041884144

11 'ffiffl * ffffiyfefr-; r L , ^ _ -,

7~X /l C '^ l/ f L

IT

S O

/O .


Assayer:.

APPENDIX C

DESCRIPTION OF THE SELF POTENTIAL SURVEYING METHOD

TO ACCOMPANY REPORT OF WORK ON MAMAINSE POINT PROPERTY MR. JEFFERY F, PAQUETTE

EXCERPTS FROMINTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING

BY MILTON H. DOBRIN

MCPHAR GEOPHYSICS BROCHURE

JFP040o.K

t^fc lirirt'i^jeSRss&iiiiiis^?:

INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING

MILTON B. DOBRIN

Triuil Oil Co. Ltd. Culyary, Alberln, Cannda

SECOND EDITION

McC.HAW-lULL HOOK COMPANY, INC.

New York Toronto London

nmo

menMype * alt dome in Louisiana. Gcologi- section. (Sinclair Oil ond Gas Co.)

342 INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING

proportionality constant is t , the electrical susceptibility. The total elec trical flux per unit area (corresponding to magnetic flux density) is K -f \vP o r (l 4 -\irt)E. The quantify (l -f- fat) i s designated as K, the dielectric constant.

This property determines the effective capacitance of a rock material and consequently its static response to any applied electric field, either direct or alternating. The dielectric constant of a vacuum is unity. For most hard rocks it ranges from about (i to Hi electrostatic units. For \vet soils and clays it is somewhat greater than this, extending up to 40 or 50 esu.

17-2. The Self-potential Method

The self-potential method involves measurement at the surface of elec- Iric potentials developed in the earth by electrochemical action between minerals and the solutions with which they are in contact. No external electric fields arc needed with this technique. When different portions of an ore body are in contact with solutions of different composition, chemical reactions take place which result in different solution pressures along the respective areas of contact. The difference in solution pressure gives rise to a potential difference which causes current flow in the ground.

Sources of Potential. When an ore body is responsible for a potential difference of this kind, it is most usually because of differential oxidation between one part of the body and another. Often the unconsolidated for mations near the surface are aerated to a much greater extent than in the zone below. An elongated vertical ore body, say of pyrite, penetrating the aerated zone from the oxygen-deficient rocks below, would be oxidized near its top but not along its bottom. Oxidation of the pyrite yields sul- furic acid, which is neutralized by carbonates adjoining the ore body. The solution of salts thus produced is in equilibrium with the pyrite at a different pressure and electric potential than is the solution in contact with the ore below the aerated zone. The difference in potential causes a current to flow between the upper and lower ends of the pyrite mass, and the return current through the ground (see Fig. 17-1) causes a potential anomaly measurable at the surface. The ore body can thus be detected at the surface from the negative potential associated with the oxidation reaction at the upper end.

While the strongest potentials of this kind are excited in ores such as pyrites, a number of other minerals, such as pyrrhotite and magnetite, give rise to self-potential patterns which are often observable on the surface. According to Kruger and Lacy, 1 alunite was responsible for a 1,700-millivolt potential anomaly at Cerro de Pasco in Peru. The polar ization was attributable to free acid released during alunitization of the

ELECTRICAL PROSPECTING MET

country rock. As pointed o do not exhibit anomalous po lions that inhibit oxidation oxidation is virtually absent.

Spurious sources of potent! chemical action. Elevation potential gradient) often cai may not be possible to correc of global extent flowing throi differences which arc sometin potentials.

Field Procedure and Inter hundreds of millivolts in nut

.1 j; 300 g E200

fig. 1 7-1. Natural potenli

porous electrodes. The pote. pairs of such electrodes mail arrangement, gradients are us differences. Equipotenlial li taining one electrode in fixed face for which no potential dif ble probe.

The theory of interpretatioi since dipole potential fields studies by Petrovski, 3 Stern, 4 tative techniques for interprei only when the polarized bodi other simple? geometrical form

Self-potential surveys have ous sulfide ore bodies at shallo

TO GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING

isceptihility. The total clec- t-o m agnetic flux density) is -J- d?rf) is designated ;is K , t in;

ipacilance of a rock material applied electric field, either

ut of a vacuum is unity. For electrostatic units. For wet. this, extending up to 40 or

ElECTRlCAl PROSPECTING METHODS 343

reinent at the surface of elec trochemical action between arc in contact. No external ic. When different portions ms of different composition, 11 different solution pressures

j^ke in solution pressure cs cl^^it flow in the ground, is responsible for a potential atisc of differential oxidation Often the unconsolidated for- ch greater extent than in the y, say of pyrite, penetrating cks below, would be oxidized ition of the pyrite yields sui tes adjoining the ore body, ilibrium with the pyrite at a n is the solution in contact Terence in potential causes a ends of the pyrite mass, and**ig. 17-1) causes a potential is body can thus be detected isociatcd with the oxidation

I arc excited in ores such as pyrrhotite and magnetite,

•c often observable on the unite was responsible for a Pasco in Peru. The polar- during alunitization of the

country rock. As pointed out by Hranl, 5 all near-surface sulfide bodies do not exhibit anomalous potentials, .since t hero are many surface condi tions that inhibit oxidation. Beneath the waler table or permafrost, oxidation is virtually absent.

Spurious sources of potential ollen obscure effects of subsurface electro chemical action. Elevation changes (on account of normal atmospheric potential gradient) often cause spurious potentials for which it may or may not be possible to correct. Telluric currents (natural earth currents of global extent flowing through the earth's crust) also result in potential differences which are sometimes difficult to separate from electrochemical potentials.

Field Procedure and Interpretation. Self-potential anomalies, often hundreds of millivolts in magnitude, can be detected by nonpolarizing

.1 * 300 g E 200 g-~ 1 00

Distance

x---v.\ /^s'O'l'a'ized ^ ^•f\\" "~ ~ ^ Acrplcd'rone

reg/o/i./.-.,,^-.- :'.-'T" ~~ N \l ''~T-'- :.:-S^\ i l — — — j-—--^-i--t—^ — j— (— - \\rafer /CT ,\ ^-f\y/

x\ /^ 41

Fig. 17-1. Noturol potenFiol profile over sulfide body oxidized ot lop.

porous electrodes. The potentials may be measured along profiles with pairs of such electrodes maintained at uniform separation. With this arrangement, gradients are usually mapped rather than actual potential differences. Equipotential lines are sometimes determined by main taining one electrode in fixed position and finding the line along the sur face for which no potential difference is observed between it and a mova ble probe.

The theory of interpretation is quite similar to that for magnetic work, since dipole potential fields are involved in both cases. Theoretical studies by Pelrovski, 3 Stern, 4 de Witte, 4 and Viingiil 6 have led to quanti tative techniques for interpreting potential anomalies. These are useful only when the polarized body can bc represented by a sphere or some other simple geometrical form.

Self-potential surveys have been responsible for the discovery of numer ous sulfide ore bodies at shallow depths of burial. Several sulfide bodies

344 INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING

have been located at Noranda by this method, as was a copper body near Sherbrooke, Quebec. Its possibilities have been investigated in other areas, such as the Tri-State zinc and lead district (see Jukosky, Dreyer, and Wilson 7 ) where no correlation was found between natural potentials and lead and zinc mineralization.

S l Devonian schist o*, i Senonion andesite

Sulphide

N-W

Fig. 17-3. Self-potential profile a nd g eologic section, Soriyer, Turkey. ( After Yiingul, G eopfiyjics, 1954.)

Yiingiil* has described a self-potential survey in the Sariyer area of Turkey which led to the discovery of a sulfide mass containing zones with copper concentrations as high as 14 per cent. A cross section of this ore body, as determined from core drilling and mining operations, is shown in Fig. 37-2, along with the polarization profile observed on the surface. TJjc steep topography required the use of terrain corrections which dis placed the predicted center of the ore body northwestward from the polar ization minimum observed in the field. A drill hole over the low axis of potential would have encountered only pyrite, as was learned subse-

ElECTRICAt PROSPECTING MET

quently when the adit show equations he had derived in that a spheroidal-shaped bo(

17-3. Equipotential-line Me

Except in the special casi measurable potential anoma needed to locate bodies Imvin years, a method has been this will be discussed subscc currents, however, the cquif

Principles. If two elcctn external voltage is applied through the earth from oncckj which the current flows is geneous in its electrical prop) the flow lines will be regular i a horizontal plane, symmJ about the line joining the trodes. Any inhomogeneity these properties will cause tions in the lines of current! Such distortions indicate the| cnce of buried material with conductivity than its surrounJ so that it attracts the flowf toward itself, or with lower ductivity, so that it tends to the lines into the surrounding that might be expected in ci

It is not possible to mcasu the earth by any direct means that the lines of flow are alv the potential is equal. This Fig. 17-4a. The potential di trodes .'l and H is distributed by the clotted lines. In a l respect, to A a long a vertical between .'l and li w ill be half potential underground, he woi at any surface point, such a.- to li is the same as the ratio

TO GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING

iod, as was a copper body near ve been investigated in oilier district (sec Jakosky, Dreyer, nd between natural potentials

ELECTRICAL PROSPECTING METHODS 345

l Devonian schist l Senonian andesite

Sulphide

N-W

r, Turkey. (After Vu'ngul, Geophysics, 1 954.)

survey in the Sariyer area of ide mass containing zones with ut. A cross section of this ore mining operations, is shown in

ofilc observed on the surface, terrain corrections which clis-

nortvestward from the polar- over the low axis of

as was learned subsc-

vM

quently when the adit shown in the figure was put through. Applying equations he had derived in a previous paper, 6 the author had predicted that a spheroidal-shaped body would be found at a depth of 23 m.

17-3. Equipotential-line Method

Except in the special cases where electrochemical reactions result in measurable potential anomalies, electric currents of external origin are needed to locate bodies having anomalous electrical properties. In recent years, a method has been developed for using natural earth currents, and this will be discussed subsequently. Of all methods requiring artificial currents, however, the equipotential-line technique is the simplest.

Principles. If two electrodes are inserted in the ground and if an external voltage is applied across them, there will be a flow of current through the earth from one electrode to the .other,. If the medium through which the current flows is homo- ,— ----~— geneous in its electrical properties, the flow lines will be regular and, in a horizontal plane, symmetrical about the line joining the elec trodes. Any inhomogeneities in these properties will cause distor tions in the lines of current flow. Such distortions indicate the exist ence of buried material with higher conductivity than its surroundings, so that it attracts the flow lines toward itself, or with lower con ductivity, so that it tends to force the lines into the surrounding medium. Figure 17-3 illustrates the effects that, might bc expected in cither case.

It is not possible to measure the direction of electric current flow in the earth by any direct means. One applies instead the general principle that the lines of flow are always perpendicular to the lines along which the potential is equal. This is illustrated by the vertical section shown in Fig. \ 7-4a. The potential difference (or voltage) impressed across elec trodes .-l and li i s distributed along the space in between them as indicated by the dolled lines, hi a homogeneous conductor, the potential with respect to A a long a vertical plane culling the surface at C m idway between .-l and li w ill be half its value at tt. I f one could measure the potential underground, he would observe that the potential is the same as at any surface point, such as 1), w herever the ratio of distances lo A a nd to B i s the same as (he ratio al that point. In the case of /). this ratio is

Fig. 17-3. Diitorlion of current flow linei by bodies hoving {A) onomolously High or (8) onomotouily low conductivity.

DAILY LOG OF MAMAINSE PROJECT

By,, jJagr F * , Pa que11e

Typed by W. Longchamps

tlf-, - -f. .- - . :'-:-'- Bought groceries and hardware to put camp together.

Tuesday, Aug. 21, 1990

Travelled to Saul t.. ; Ste,, Marie Mining Recorder's office. Lands'

VWitle, sent lefcter^off^to Belco^Tiraber (surface right holder).,,,- - .- ijT-*'-i;"X'*'-'.,... 1 , '* -' , . . . .-vTi.vijii^ti.. .'-\\^-tut.:j-j.^w'.'i^^j^.aa.-p:- -t-.H--;~.-.,. .\ . -^ * *^ fj^^'A&Sti^tai^.^^*^-;-^

T;^mStu1rnea'to Ma

Wednesday. Aug. 22, 1990'

^SpLshed setting'-u^^f^^^^g^bti^i^ Prospected around mouth

of Government Creek, traversed the shore for 450 m. (Claim #

1064143). Examined three veins, very narrow, took two samples,

(Mam. 11206 - Mam. 11207 - PlanA).

Thursday, Aug. 23, 1990

Finished traverse along shore to west (Claim # 1064142). Flagged

West boundary. Traversed logging road to East boundary ( Claim #'s

1064142 and 1064141 ). No samples taken. (Plan B Claim # 1064140)

Friday, Aug. 24, 1990

Started cutting base from shore of Lake Superior sta 100N on

shore of lake. Refer index map. Plan (1)

Saturday, Aug. 25, 1990

Wug. 25, 1990 cont'd.

Rained, dug around old mine dump and trenches . Cleaned brush

around #3 shaft.

Sunday, Aug. 26, 1990

Worked on base line, chained to 4+OOS. Put in Line(L) 1-fOON.'k'•'&M -

chained 450 m. to East boundary. Ran East boundary to Sta. 3+50N. Vfifr -

Have to use as second base line to run cross lines west into Lake.

See Plan (2).

to 538 m. N bluff above shore of lake.

shore;: Spent rest of day prospecting shore line from L4+50N to

i E. boundary. Found 2 1 (two feet) wide Hematite (specular), many

many small calcocite veins with malachite stain. Too close to

Lake Superior shore, did not sample.

Tuesday, Aug. 28, 1990

Cut on base line to creek and across on to top of hill, chained

up to L 8+OOS.

Wednesday, Aug. 29, 1990

Put in L 0+50N to East 4+40 m., L1+50N back to L 3+OOE. Stopped

at shear cliff. Put in L4+OON, LO+50N. West to lake. Put in

lO+OO West to lake.

Thursday, Aug. 30, 1990

Got samples ready for shipment. Finished L1+50N. Put in L3+50N

Aug. 30, 1990 c ant ' d

to lake.

Friday, Aug. 31, 1990

Went to Bruce Mines.

Tuesday, Sept. 4, 1990

Picked up supplies and returned to Mamainse Mine.

Wednesday , Sept .5 , 1990

followed . to #2 shaft, found little of

\

Thursday, Sept. 6, 1990

Put in line 0+50S .west to lake. Traversed old Copper Corp. Rd.

Located L- Zone. Found 2 old drill holes. Took sample of vein

(Claim # 1064148) Sample # Mam-11206, see Plan C.

Friday Sept. 7, 1990 *

Prospected north shore of lake to East boundary, found calcite

vein, followed for 250 m South-west. Did not sample. See Plan D.

Saturday, Sept. 8, 1990l

Put in LO+00 to East boundary 433m. Put in LO+50S East to boun

dary 420 m. Put in Ll+OOS East to boundary 410m.-'

'Sunday, Sept. 9, 1990

Cyt'ibase line and chained to L12+25S,

Monday, Sept. 10, 1990

Cut base line and chained to L17+OOS.

teTuesday, Sept. 11, 1990 '

Cut base line and chained1 to L22+OOS.

Wednesday, Sept. 1

Finished

#?o1^^208,

orked ion maps till bus time, went home. Out of propane.

Spent week of Sept. 15-21, 1990 prospecting another property.

Saturday Sept. 22, 1990

Pick up supplies.i

Sunday, Sept. 23, 1990

Returned to Mamainse Mine from Bruce Mines. Driven by M.

Lumme. Mr. Lumme helped me move camper and set up tent.

Monday, Sept. 24, 1990

j*k wood in morning. Put in Ll+OOS to lake. Put in L1+50S to

east boundary. Put in L1+50S west to lake.

ism

*4iS

Tuesday Sept. 25, 1990

Moved to L9+50S east and west 900 m. Road at 1+20E. doing south

end first to beat snow.

Wednesday, Sept. 26, 1990

PUt in L9+OOW 150m Rd. 1 + 30E#

Put in L9+OOE 740m CI. 3+OOE

Put in L8+50W 140m

Put in L8+OOW 125m

Put in L8+OOS 749m East Rd. 2+23E

1506m

Friday, Sept. 28, 1990

Put in L10+OOS 725m CL3+20E 1st Rd. 5+75E

Put in L10+50S 716m CL2+76E Ist.Rd. 5+90E

1441m

Saturday, Sept. 29, 1990

Put in Lll+OOS 714m CL2+75E 1st Rd. 5+91E

Put in L11+50S 691m CL2+22E 1st Rd. 6+63E

1405m

Sunday, Sept. 30, 1990

Put in L12+OOS 679m E

Put in L10+OOS 173m W

Put in L10+50S 178m W

Put in Lll+OOS 191m W

Put in L11+50S 203m.W

Monday, Oct. l, 1990

Put in L12+OOS ;223m W. .*'t~, ,"•• :i ^ft*v- Put in,al2*50sM239m W-,. -- i t '--tf(i\v"''~-\'*'~iri " -f-r-it J^TrJfflMT -.'-i *.--.- * ^ .'••-•••'^ Put

^ * Put in L14+OOS 276m W


1480m

Tuesday, Oct. 2, 1990






1535m

Wednesday, Oct. 3, 1990





1425m j

Thursday Oct. 4, 1990

Put. in L19+50S 384m W



1187m

Friday Oct. 5, 1990



Put in L22+OOS A32m W

^-'

Put in L22+50S 445m W Rd. 221m W

Put in L23+OOS 459m W CL 124m W



1858m

Sunday Oct. 7, 1990

Went home to Bruce Mines

Tuesday Oct. 9, 1990

W. Longchamps and myself travelled from Bruce Mines to Mamainse

Point after picking up supplies in the Soo. Got S.P. ready

for Oct. 10, solution mixed, and cables straightened.

Wednesday Oct. 10, 1990

Went to area known as L Zone

Oct. 10, 1990 coni. 'd. .

area of L15+50S Sta 1+25W and ran S. P. through line L15+50S

to 17+50S Base Line O (BL) to west boundary. S. P. is not

reading any more than background. This is a good mineralized

zone. W. Longchamps and myself have decided to stay up and

strip this area for more sampling as George Babcock whom I

borrowed the S. P. from is in Toronto this week.

Thursday Oct. 11, 1990

W. Longchamps and myself began to strip area around station

riZ+OOW j, L17+OQSS:; We are following down a 4 inch chalcociteIfl^^^^^^^^^^^^---- •••' '.' ' :-

veth 'we*^ had pre^busly located. See Plan C.

fc^^Friday Oct. 12, 1990

Longchamps and Paquette continued stripping area and prospected

toward showing at L-Zone.

Saturday Oct. 13, 1990

Continued stripping and following veins, cleaned off areas to

be sampled and took samples 210,211,212^14,215 (Claim #1064146)

See Plan D.

Sunday Oct. 14, 1990

Packed samples for shipment, closed up camp. Will be gone for

week looking at a new property. Home to Bruce Mines.

Saturday Nov. 3, 1990

M.,-Lumme and myself travelled to Mamainse Point. We stripped

further north on the L-Zone and took samples 112216 and 112217

Sunday Nov. 4, 1990

Still not well. Much pain.grf

Friday Nov. 9, 1990

Returned home to Bruce Mines to see Dr. Reid. Lost week.

,

Arrived Mamainse.i'Pqtiitf:with R. Rogoschensky. Having him finish

sheets to be found with expenditures.

Saturday Dec. l, 1990

M. Lumme arrived at camp 8 a.m. R. Rogoschensky and myself to

L-Zone to extend small trench. Sampled 'numbers 11218-11219.

M.Lumme calculates one more week before finishing job he's on,

Will use him as S.P. operator. Went to Soo with M.Lumme to

get supplies and ship samples.

Sunday Dec. 2, 1990

M. Lumme and myself took groceries to R. Rogoschensky then

drove to Bruce Mines.

11

Saturday Dec. 8, 1990

Took supplies to R. Rogoschensky, checked on his progress.

Sunday Dec. 9,1990

Returned to Sault, staying in the Soo.

)


M. Lumme started on S. P. survey. R. Rogoschensky is the helper.

I went with them for a half day, too hard travelling for me.

Sunday Dec ;V 16 ,^|90

M. Lumme and R* Rogoschensky on S. P. survey. I cut firewood1 ' \ ~. - ' ' :, ' 'i ', ''*V i\* *- "''" '- 'i ' '

f or "c^mp/"^^ He haa realty

erty he would like to keep an eye on. Rogoschensky wants to

stay in camp. I will supply groceries for both, and stay in

the Soo. It's handy if problems arise.

Thursday Dec. 20, 1990

M. Lumme and myself took the snow machine to the bush this

morning to be used soon. Keeping time sheets on Lumme and

Rogoschensky.


Have lined up R. Bennett to replace Rogoschensky as latter must

return to trapping after Christmas.

12.

Monday Dec. 24, 1990

Christmas Eve. Left bush at 3 P.M. Paid R. Rogoschensky.

Friday Jan. 4, 1991

Lumme and Bennett to the bush for S.P. survey.

5 '.v "

Sunday Jan 13, 1991 '

R. Bennett called this evening. Has acquired a job with A&P

store, meat cutter.

:, "..#',". ;.

W/ LongchampS'-atcpnipanied Lumme to Mamainse Pt. as new helper.

Wednesday, Jan. 23, 1991

Have decided to suspend operations on S.P. survey untill weather

is better and have more funds.

Author

J.F. Paquette

asuremenl system

Fast reconnaisance system for mineral exploration using self-potential measurements

Self-Potential MethodElectrochemical reactions in buried

metal sulphide deposits give rise to spontaneous currents in the ground. The presence of these currents can be readily detected.

Prospecting, based on the self- potential method, consists of measuring the D.C. potential between a pair of electrodes placed in the ground. Electrode separations are normally 30 meters or less. The electrodes are moved progressively along a line or across a zone of interest. The self-potential measured between the electrodes can range from a few millivolts to over one volt.

Data from a completed line can be plotted as a line profile which would show a voltage peak over the mineralized zone and gradually decreasing voltages on either side of the zone. A peak of two or three hundred millivolts would be considered a good S.P. anomaly. Data from many lines can also be presented as a map of equipotential contours.

Measurement SystemThere are several important

considerations in the construction of a self-potential system. The console or D. voltmeter srjpuld hayaarxioput impedance o "...

ground,.^ low input impedance would Jrf effectively load the ground impedance] and reduce the self-potential between!] electrodes. Secondly, the polarity between electrodes will depend on which electrode is the far or near electrode and from what direction the mineralized zone is approached. The measuring device therefore should clearly display voltage polarity which can then be related to electrode orientation.

The electrodes employed for the measurement must be of special construction. If a pair of metal stakes were driven into the ground, the contact potential due to electrochemical action between the ground and the stake could exceed the voltage being measured. A porous pot assembly is the common

electrode used for S.P. It consists of a pot with a porous membrane at the bottom. Prior to a survey, the pot is filled with a copper sulphate solution. A copper rod extends from the lid of the pot into the solution. When the porous pot is placed in position the solution slowly leaks out into the ground establishing a non polarizing contact between the ground and the copper rod.

System ComponentsThe SP-2 system consists of the following:— Digital D.C. Voltmeter and carrying

case.— Porous Pot Assembly with 4 porous

pots ready tor use, 2 extension handles, 1 leakproof container, Vi kg. of copper sulphate crystals.

— Winder reel and unipod with 300 meters of tough, coppej-wejd, nylon covered wire. —-r—-^-^"-- - -

— A reinforced transit case for the complete system.

APPENDIX D

LIST OF SELECTED SP ANOMALIES


JFP0406.R

LIST OF SELECTED ANOMALIES TO ACCOMPANY PLAN JFP91-3

ANOMALY

A

LOCATION

19450S/425W to 24S/2W

INTERPRETATION PRIORITY

Probable extension of Coppercorp 2 C Zone: structure.

B

D

E

19S/375WProjection to 20S/450W

7+50S/050W to 850S/050W

850S/075E to 20S/450W

1450S/100E to 15S/100E

2150 and 22S/ O to 100E

At probable flexure or junction of : Lutz Vein trend and C Vein trend High priority target because of structural location, strong response. Structural intersection may have short (200 m.) strike, steep plunge.

Probable vein parallel to Lutz Vein '. west of adit. Open to north. Strong response on two lines.

Spotty weak anomalies along known i trend of Lutz Vein. Drilled in 1968, 1969, 14 holes. Revaluate for gold content.

weak anomaly, line.

strong response one

Irregular anomalous response, Possible breccia zone?

G, It

19S to 20+50S/ 200E to 500E

15S/100E to 17S/600E

Weak irregular responses overlie low conglomerate on east part of claims Low priority because of geological setting

Unusual negative values without corresponding positive values. Suspect instrumental problems. Resurvey lines

Strong linear response, probably cross fault mapped by Thomson, Giblin. Mineralisation possible, but unlikely based on experience.

low

JFP040G.R

Ontario 41N82SE0107 2.14860 RYAN 900

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere duDeveloppement du Nord et des Mines

July 15, 1991

Mining Lands Section159 Cedar Street, 4th FloorSudbury, OntarioP3E 6A5

Telephone: (705) 670-7264 Fax: (705) 670-7262

Your File: Our File:

W. 9150. 00051 2. 14060

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines875 Queen Street EastP. O. Box 669Sault Ste. Marie, OntarioP6A 2B3

Dear Sir/Madam:

RE: Notice of Intent dated June 12, 1991 for Geophysical (S. P. ) Survey on mining claims SSM. 1064144 et al. in Ryan Township.

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mi indicate on your records.

sincerel

claims and so

Ron. C. Gashinski,Provincial Manager, Mining LandsMines 8c Minerals Division

CDS/ j l Enclosure:

cc: Mr. Jef fery F. Paquette Bruce Mines, Ontario

Resident GeologistSault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Mr. Roy J. Rupert Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Assessment Files Office Toronto, Ontario

MWttryo*North*fT\•ndMlriM WortcCrwfltt 12.14060

DM iftMntMK**or4*r* Report *f June 12, 199^8^9150.0001 1

Jeffpry F.'YowntM* or Am

Typ* of wrvty mi iwmbor *f~~ A*m*m*M d*Y* *r*dlt p*r tlUm

0#ophytlc*l f ltctrom*gn*ttc. -diyi

SSM.1064144 to 148 incl, 1078952 to 954 incl,

radiometric. -deyi

InduMdpokrlMtlon.

S.P.Other——— 61.5 -d*yi

Section 77 (19) Se* "Mining ClUmt Ai*wt*d" eohimn

Gtologlctl ——————————.——————*v*

Sp*el*l provlilon Q

Alrbom*

Ground

D Cndlt* h*v* b**n r*duc*d DKMIM of p*rtW covtrtg* of el*ln*.

fi Cr*dlt*h*v*b**nr*duc*db*c*N*ofcorr*ctlom to work eUtti and flgurtt of *ppllc*nt.

Sp*ol*l crxflto undtr xctlon 77 (16) for th* following mining dilrm

No Cfxfltt h*v* bun tHowtd for th* fotlowlrn mining dtlimQ not tuff ictantly eovtrad by th* wrv*y Q ln*ufflcl*nt t*chnle*l d*U flM

Th* Mining R*cord*r nvy r*duo* th* *bow cndltt If n*c***try In order thM th* tottl numb*r of (pprovtd MM*tm*nt d*y* r*oord*d on Meh ddm do** not *xo**d th* maximum *||ovMd M follow: 0*ophyile*l - W; 0*ologooil - 40; 0*xh*mlc*l - 40; l*ettofl 77(19) - 60.

J^inislry ofi Northern Development

and MinesDOCUMENT NO

Report of WorkAct {Geophysical, Geological and Geochemical Surveys)

Instructions- Please type or print.- Refer to Section 77, the Mining Act for assessment work requirements

and maximum credits allowed per survey type.- K number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form,

attach a list.- Technical Reports and maps In duplicate should be submitted to

Mining Lands Section. Mineral Development and Lands BranmType of Survey(s)

Recorded Holder(s)

J

s \(Jir o5 u '# f t 'r y

Wiping Division

f.Prospector's Licence No.

Address

UC fTelephone No.

Survey Company

Name and Address Ql Author (of Geo-Technical Report)

, 2.BName

Key

.1*060Date of Survey (from A to)

ay | Ma | ay | Mo | Yr.Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

-Other sfytS'^

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Other

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

ao

Days per Claim

——

Total miles flown over claim(s). ^^Date l Recorded Holde/or Amnt (Signature)

?A 04 -s 2 ^/^ /S^r*

Mining ClaimPrefix

5^//

SM

Number

/664 /44/664 )4S-/06f J46t #64 j4~7

/064 j 4 8

rt7Zte~L/e789S}*

/^Btfl

RECE

APRl

IVhiwvtf-tANi

Mining ClaimPrefix

WE

'19911C OLib bel

Number

REG——— APF

Receipt h

P

iftdN ———

Mining ClaimPrefix

O R

Number

D ED...-i^l99I

0.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

"™""a*l li il

i ' ""' -.s'-~Certification Verifying Reprwt of/Work

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in this Report o! Work, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report is true.Name and Address oLPerson Certifying

t/* fcts/tfrt.7, L B

For Office Use Only

•.mfPa Uj/flecorded

'Proiiincial Manager, Mining Lands

toWORK STATEMENT1

Received StampSAUttSTEMRIEMGD

RECEIVED

12AVR1391 m

1362(8970*)-

Ministry of•Northern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

DOCUMENT NO W9150

Report of WorkAct (Expenditures, Subsection 77(19))

Instructions- Please type or print.- Refer to Subsection 77(19), the Mining Act for assessment work

requirements and maximum credits allowed under this Subsection.- Technical Reports, maps and proof of expenditures In duplicate

should be submitted to Mining Lands Section, Mineral Development and Lands Branch. Aji J. , . AT* t*

Type of Work Performed Mining Division Township or Area

Recorded Holder Pio'spector's licence No.

Telephone No.

Z. 14060ând Address of Author (of Submission) Date When Work was Performed

From: i To:.

All the work was performed on Mining Claim(s): Indicate no. of days performed on each claim. "SeeLJNoteiô.J) on reverse side——————

Mining Ciaim

S #64/42No. ol Days Mining Claim t No ol Days Mining Claim No. ol Days Mining Claim No. ol Days

7îning Claim No. of DaysjMinmg Claim No. ol Days Mining Claim No. ol Days Mining Claim No. ol Days Mining Claim No ol Days Mining Claim No ol Days

Mining Claim No. ol Days Mining C'aim No of Days Mining Claim No. ol Days Mining Claim No of Days Mining Claim No ol Days Mining Claim No ci Days

InstructionsTotal days ccedits may be distributed at claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim in the expenditure days credit column (below). ———^—--—^^—.——

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total Expenditures ____ _

Total Days Credits

Total Number of Mining Claims Covered by this Report of Work

Mining Claims (List in numerical sequence). If space is insufficient, attach schedules with required informationMining Claim

Prefix

SSrtNumber

/fi f 4/4 1

Expend. Days Cr.

ZZ.Z.

Mining ClaimPrefix

Total Number of Days Performed

2*, Z

Number

M

Expend. Days Cr.

-Rt

— w

I\ni\ll3

Mining ClaimPrefix

pppL/ 1: 1

R4-^

LANDS

Number

/ED ——

991

SECTION

Total Number o) Days Claimed

ZZ. 7-

Expend. Days Cr.

-^

jyr&r

Mining ClaimPrefix

t-e-tAPR

Mot /Vo

Number

3RD E

32 1991 ——

— - 1 ii ..^.^^ --^j

Expend. Days Cr.

D

Total Number ol Days to be Claimed at a Future Dale 1

0Cerirfication~of Beneficial Interest 'See Note No. 2 on reverse side

l hereby certify that, at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this report of work were recorded in the current recorded holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder. ____ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Date Holder o^gent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work '//'(Shereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same

during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is'true.Name and Address of Person Certifying

-**P- z BTelephone No. Datey J-04- By (Signature;

Received

For Office UsejDnlySTE

RECEIVED

12 AVR 1991 AM •l '5HVK l331 PH

Q 0

^

|: -;' i '

B

'

- " J

" fi

-nw

"'

-n

r---li*

W t

r"

i*

zr*i

^

on

z

*w

n

O

yI

D

LJ

-w^

O

X

m"

S 5

* -

o s 5

P"!

T

P

0w

r to

*^

o

*"

5 m0

x

m

*-x

^*-,

^~

' ^

? -

o

**—

2

Z

^z

t

z

S is ~

T,

z m

o a

r

5

3

H~

Z

.-T

o

-nj,

X

0

0

^

—o

o

y f ^' -K

'V

J

^ ,

*i Cw

'LX

^

t-'

i w

w o

r1

p P

If i

7i

w

jt

3-

rn:

* i

l E

^ z

J*r

s 8

s v

s B

w^

* "

f" 9

b s

^^

li'.--

-n\

i

z b

jE *

* g

s

w

1f

S i

f 1

S z

F N

" f

S 5

i*'^

J

' I'

0

0O

^

>

m

.nH

t.

f

W

* ; i;

q ^

o ^

o '

^ S

f w

9 i

" v

x.

S

C

x

-H

1 *

*l 3J

H

w

1 B

3 *

w

Q

>

O

ZQ

n

Z

i~V

* *

'a 1'

"i

r-

^

v-

Ci

1

H

A "

x ^

t *

i n

lv? 5

i f

Z

O 3D S 2 Tl

X o a ISPOSIT

O z

"—

J^

^J m •z. o rn C/)

7

W-

P iv

J

IW

O

PA

LME

R

TWP.

m m

m NOVEMBER

1986

CD?

i w

OJ ro CJi

3tt

\

3^

Ministryof

y

J

Natural

UrX

Resources

tario

o.

u.

u"^ ?

w*

w

O

O2

-**a O -O 3 w

pig

lgS

^Q

o

^ C/

) w

c/)

- ^^"

^ - 4

o

H

HE

m

* pi

?

is

s s

e >

>

E

^C

^^—

—

H

t! m

m

^

S 3

.

S "

K5

5 5

m e i **^

kj ?8

0 r?

1 i O

x i . g n i >

S z

5 W

5 1

cnm

jkg

:cD

5k^o

'^a3

:D2:

llifiM

liM^f

m ^

1 O

m 3

D S

O m

l)

W C

| W

z

s|o

S5

oi8

|gg

|s||

~j ^ o

^'

7*

,^

—i-l

;^

1

rn^

-

5^

f' o

——'^

?Z

S

CP

•JJ >

U

S

fy^

Tim

C

I-4

rn

s .

t

7

I C

P *

2 r

S ifn

ifiXLUED

l

ft

GRAVEL

MINIP4O

RIGHTS

IM PARCEL

WU.

VCSTCO IN

ORIGINA

LAMO*

ACT.

R.SO

1*7O.

C y r

to *s'

y i

ll J

.M?

n;J i'3 "s?

C5*

(a lr P1

t

i W

.SURFACE RIGHTS

ONL

.MINING

RIGHTS

ONLY.

•4CE

Of

OCCUPATION ——

:R-N^COUNC1L i

i i

i i 1 : i

38^

1 i i i j i 1r,

t

SURFACE

4.

M Z

Z o 3) o z B

i . MINING

RIGHTS

ONL •*. C

I i

i 3 NT.

SURFACE 8t

MINING 1

.SURFACE

RIGHTS

DN

3 O •B C s m Z

H

r-

±-c

ci

0ft

VI Z S

o SPOSiriON

OF o o s at ^*fc z o 00

• •••

•Mn

|iiiS

S|i|

IE;

x2

' **

^

~*

—

i** ni

(Tl

*

f~1

7

7

"^

r~

o

O

'^

j

w

"

m

•J

3Um

j;

55

1\ i i

i :

v\

: i1

) 1 i

'

**y\

\ 1'

RCEL

BOUNDARY

N

ING

CLAIMS

ETC.

WAY

AND

P!C:.i OF

WA*

TY

LINES i

1 l l 1

Cr w

r-

0

t

0 TS.

MINING CLAIMS

PAR

RVEYED

LINES:

T

LINES

D m

m H

O

!? *

2 5

-i a

v i

oO

^r

—

m

I

U9

EYED

LINES:

WNSHIPS, BASE

LINE

S, EI p

WAY

AND

ROUTE

No.

R

ROADS y

li V1 1 H i I

r-

m

O

m Z

D

— T

im m

i IT

enGO

co

enCO o

COCO

CM CV

i

CO ro CVJ

CO *r OJ

CO tn w

7E

V \ \

l

n to o O)

CO

CO o 2

CO

CO

CO o CO

CO

en COr

Q *t

.4

**'

K J

4 *

Q ^

Q

,.,M

l|^S

•a

nte*

*-.

"S.

N

/

9

O CO

CO

N Z CO

CO

o l

K)

CO

CO

CO CO

ID CO

—.—

j..-,.—

—.-.

CO * 5? to o z (O

(O

/.

/

6E 4E 3E 2E IE

m O) m

Ci N2W 3W 4W

W

RE

CE

IVF

n6W

i*'1

l, 1

4060

LANU

S dt

Ci'i

? y*

^ *

C

SC

AL

E

l 2500

i GO

ME

TR

ES

20

0

7W

210

E V

I S

10 N

5

4--

4 4

RO

Y

J.

RU

PE

RT

CO

NS

ULT

1NG

G

EO

LO6I

S T

JEF

FE

RY

F.

P

AQ

UE

TT

EM

AM

AIN

SE

P

OIN

T

PR

OP

ER

TY

SA

MP

LE

LOC

ATIO

N

PLA

N

RJR

A

PR

IL

10,

1991

10u-j

00

2.1 1,7

2-4

\* *'^ ^—

^s

3,z 2.6 ?,

K

""-

^M

*

\ i

Z.Z f-i V "•* tf T}

-^T; ** ."

-w M '~

1.2

2? /"

t7

7^-

V,

^ '

17 X *O

i.*

v)

3.4

3.7 ri

"*.r

'7 " .X

i.* X

*.f

-

..i

/.f

\2.

7

l.f 2*

yn /.s 2

.9

"ST

" '

~~

2.*

A f

2.0 2- J

2-7

A*

A*

* *7

H

*- '

•*sA

?

3*

2.6

A

**

*

J*

re ^

2-9 ,s- \6 2

.1

,-/

2- -f

J./

- AT

/.9

*'4

s^ ^ 2.5

Z. 6

l./

-rt. 2.

7

2.*

...

3.1

2.6

zS 2-7 3,*

— . —

— .

2.7 3.7 rv 2

.4 !rr 27

2.3

2?

i!

*.7 z.9 V* ",, i.*'

2. f

4-3

- 3.9 /.r

A*

TLX^

, o

\

^

2.5 ^* \6 ",,

7.4

1M

A

J-/

2.1 1.0

2.7 A?

z.Z

1

*.. y

M - '

3,Ze

z^—

^'f- 2*7

3,2

3..

/''

3 J

fcfc

-s.

^^?T

*ifc

.

Z.Z i. 9,

2.

2- --

-V

w J./ z-f

Z-*

X

** ^

2-7 _

__

1y"

2.3

- '•' t ~—

^

5

2-'

2.*

J-/

1.4

'i

,,

f2.

7 7, '

^ i.ii

i.f 2,r f7

7-1

f.0 r* z. r 3.9 ,z..

4.7 *7 7* Z.(S i. j J6 ,

^.-*

**

lnx -' 1.

2

z.?

J* ,3 A^

"~— -

^

2-7

-\

*^

i

... *'E

-

v ^ *36y

Z.^

i-

^/ p

A"

3-^

,

4.^

A*

^3

oTJ

/,5

j.*

/.-^

i.9

},4

i*

/-^ /

.z* jri

,r

-S ^

3,3

2.3

/Z "

2.4*

' /-

Z

A?

Z.7

Z-^

J.Z

2.^

Z.7

z./

^

^-*

j,r *

-*.

2 .3

t*

/J I.* z.

J

J*1

2.7 (S'''

2-4 H 2.4- zJ-^

v^^*

•\ x

/.o ,,

X. 77

^

1.7

-;

•^ * ^

'SJ5

t.1

4..1

2-0

1.7

I.*

2.9 2-3 " Z. 9

2. Z

2.3 ^•' -'f

Z'4

2.2 ^ 2.5 2.* X' W '/* 4-

z

2.3

3.7

i

**

'^ 2.6

/'' 3-

r

Vz

^

z./

V

^-C

v i

Z'*--

\

\.9 2-3

"i V 1- *

S*

***

- .

••i

* ir. 77

1 4i 'J f yj

"^ 2.3

. i.?

i-f ^i

V

.^

^ st O

C S

t f

j: i

* ^i ^pk

^-t

. ^3

^

C

^

X

f 5;

4 5

Z 3 z . * -

!A

-

J

V. t

(K K.

*s, ^

^^

T

f *

1

1 r i J i z z 1 . 1 t Q t 1

^ ft x

1 t i i

-^-^

" f

* I ^ Z ' J ^ 1 l.

1 1 j^

i i . ' -^

'1 " '

:

t Si

!t

z.i

,-/.* : 'Z*

1 2

.2

t 2.

7. l

Z.6-

, Sft

l Z.

Z

. B

3 J-

*

f 2.

4

l 17

.1

l 3*

f

l! 2.

4

1 **

.' ^

4 *-5

"

'/2.t

i 3.9

i 2J2,

2V

^"^" 'i

A3 l /'2.5

"

, 'z. i ,!^

rz.9

/' ^

-^

U' i*

2

i

•J**

*^).'

' '

\

\t.i

l 4

,7

' ''

*

l t.

4i Z

Z.Z Xi^

f 2

.7

/*-'

1 2.

f

( 2.

3

1 3-

4

l 2-

4

' I.

f. lf

.it3

'1'''"

•9\

• i/

1/77

V*1

l /,

7

( l z.

*f

3 z-

/ 1

o i r - l l l

tl i

i

2. 1

l. l

i.O Z-1

"'

1.6 /TZ i? im Z~3

X

2.^ ^

Z.I z. 3

i.)

z- 3 " z./ ^ z.6 i.* *i

-4-

Z

4/4

1A

^.

2,4

4-9"

4-' z./ ^ ; - - l . ' ' t t i

i '

yj

j ^ /7T2 i.f W?

*/

2.5

2. J

Z 4

z. r ^ *K 1.7

,* z. 3

2.6

2.0

2.4

Z. f

2.1

2.7

2.3

4. C

2.6 z./

2-3 l./ J* 2.1

~ 2.4

z.7

V*

2-5 7.

Z

5-7

~^

x-"" •s. .J -

LAK

E

SU

PE

RIO

R

2.^

3-2

TA?

J

N

- 4

W

N-

5W

f S

* t m

P

mt'

f fr*

*

* C

****

* x

S y

/^

f^

J* f s

t* f

ffi*

ffr*6r-/

2. 1

4060

,\PR

i 's

1991

MIN

ING

LAIR

DS S

ECTI

ON

- 7W

lOQ

__l

41

NB

2S

E0

10

7

2.1

40

60

R

YA

N2

20

RE

VIS

ION

SR

OY

J.

R

UP

ER

TC

ON

SU

LTIN

G

GE

OLO

GIS

TJE

FF

ER

Y

F. P

AO

UE

TT

E

MA

MA

INS

E

PO

INT

P

RO

PE

RT

Y

SE

LF

P

OT

EN

TIA

L

SU

RV

EY

RJR

APRI

L. (

O.

1991

7FP

91

-3

summary report mamainse mine property mcdonell …€¦ · copper from the area. records very...

Documents