summary of results from the court’s annual audits of the ...€¦ · summary of results from the...
TRANSCRIPT
12, rue Alcide De Gasperi - L - 1615 Luxembourg T (+352) 4398 – 1 E [email protected] eca.europa.eu
Summary of results from the Court’s annual audits of the
European Agencies and other bodies for the financial year 2015
2
CH4085661EN02-16PP-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.docx 4.10.2016
CONTENTS
Paragraph
INTRODUCTION 1
INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE COURT’S OPINIONS 11
AUDIT RESULTS
Opinions on the reliability of the accounts 15
Opinions on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts 17
Other matter - event after balance sheet date 19
Comments made in the SARs 20
Follow-up of previous years’ comments 27
CONCLUSIONS 29
Annex I – Agencies' budget and staff
Annex II – Comments made by the Court, not calling its opinions into question
Annex III – Follow-up of open comments not calling the Court’s opinions into question
3
CH4085661EN02-16PP-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.docx 4.10.2016
INTRODUCTION
1. Pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union1
2. This summary provides an overview of the results of these audits. It aims to facilitate the
analysis and comparison of the Court’s Specific Annual Reports (SARs). The Court’s opinions
and comments as well as the replies to them can be found in the respective SARs. This
summary is not an audit report or opinion.
, the
European Court of Auditors (Court) has audited and issued opinions on the reliability of the
accounts and on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, for the financial
year ended 31 December 2015 for 41 agencies, offices and bodies (agencies) and the
Europol Pension Fund (EPF).
3. Agencies are highly visible in the Member States and have significant influence on policy
and decision making and programme implementation in areas of vital importance to
European citizens, i.e. health, safety, security, freedom and justice. Depending on their task,
set-up and financing, distinction can be made between decentralised agencies, executive
agencies, self-financed agencies and other bodies.
4. The 30 decentralised agencies play an important role in implementing EU policies,
especially tasks of a technical, scientific, operational and/or regulatory nature. Their aim is to
allow the Commission to concentrate on policy-making and to reinforce cooperation
between the EU and national governments by pooling technical and specialist expertise from
both sides. They are located throughout the EU.
5. The six executive agencies are entrusted with tasks relating to the management of one
or more Union programmes and are set up for fixed periods of time. They are located in
Brussels (five) and Luxembourg (one).
1 OJ C 326, 26.10.2012. p. 1.
4
CH4085661EN02-16PP-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.docx 4.10.2016
6. The three self-financed agencies comprise the Office for Harmonization in the Internal
Market (OHIM)2, the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) and the Single Resolution Board
(SRB)3
7. The other bodies comprise the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT),
the Euratom Supply Agency (Euratom) and the Europol Pension Fund (EPF). The EIT in
Budapest is an independent, decentralised EU body which pools scientific, business and
education resources to boost the Union's innovation capacity. The Euratom in Luxembourg
was created to support the aims of the European Atomic Energy Community Treaty. The EPF,
which is located in The Hague, was established to finance and pay pensions for staff
employed by the European Police Office (Europol) before it became an agency on
1 January 2010. The EPF has been dissolved as of 1 January 2016.
. The SRB in Brussels became fully operational as of 1 January 2016 with the mission to
ensure the orderly resolution of failing banks, minimising the impact on the real economy
and on public finances.
8. The agencies’ total 2015 budget amounted to some 2,8 billion euro (2014: 2,6 billion
euro) or about 2,0 % of the 2015 EU general budget (2014: 1,9 %). The major part of the
agencies’ budget is funded through the Commission’s subsidies; the rest is income from fees
and other sources.
9. By the end of 2015 the agencies employed 9 965 staff (2014: 9 379)4
10. Details on the agencies, their budgets and staff are provided in Annex 1.
. The number of staff
increased the most in agencies dealing with migration matters (European Asylum Support
Office - EASO) and the prevention of serious crime and terrorism (Europol). The executive
agencies where the staff number went up have an extended mandate and obtained
additional responsibilities.
2 As of 23 March 2016, the Office is called the European Union Intellectual Property Office
(EUIPO).
3 Article 102 of the Financial Regulation of the SRB.
4 Staff includes officials, temporary and contract staff as well as seconded national experts.
5
CH4085661EN02-16PP-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.docx 4.10.2016
INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE COURT’S OPINIONS
11. The arrangements for the audit of agencies’ accounts are presented in Table 1
Table 1 - Audit arrangements for agencies’ accounts
.
Agencies Audited by Total
Court Court + audit firm
Decentralised agencies - 30 30
Executive agencies 6 - 6
Self-financed agencies 2 15 3
Other bodies 26 1 3
Total 10 32 42
12. The annual accounts of 32 agencies were verified by an independent external auditor
(audit firm) according to Article 208(4) of the EU Financial Regulation7 and Article 107(1) of
the framework financial Regulation for agencies8
5 The SRB is audited by the Court and an audit firm.
. The Court’s opinions on these accounts
considered the audit work performed by the audit firm and the action taken in response to
their observations. The Court has reviewed the work of the audit firms in accordance with
international audit standards. This review provided adequate assurance for the Court to
base its own audit opinions on the reliability of the accounts using the audit firms’ work.
6 Given the limited resources and operations of the Euratom Supply Agency, it is audited solely by the Court.
7 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1).
8 Article 107 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013 (OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42).
6
CH4085661EN02-16PP-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.docx 4.10.2016
13. For the remaining nine agencies and the EPF, the Court continued to perform the audit
of the reliability of the accounts. The audit work covered compliance with the applicable
accounting rules, completeness and accuracy of balance-sheet and budget figures and an
analysis of the statement of financial performance and of the budget implementation.
14. As in prior years the Court remained exclusively responsible for the audit of the legality
and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts of all agencies and the EPF. The
audit approach comprised analytical audit procedures, direct testing of transactions and an
assessment of the agencies’ internal controls.
AUDIT RESULTS
Opinions on the reliability of the accounts
15. The final accounts of 40 agencies and the EPF present fairly, in all material respects, their
financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Financial
Regulations and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s Accounting Officer.
16. The Court issued a qualified opinion on the reliability of Frontex’ final accounts for the
financial year 2015. The qualification is based on a material underestimation of accrued
charges by 1,7 million euro.
Opinions on the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the accounts
17. The Court concluded that for the 40 agencies and the EPF, the transactions underlying
the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2015 were legal and regular in all
material respects.
18. The Court issued a qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of the transactions
underlying the EIT’s accounts. The qualification was primarily based on the use of an
irregular flat rate related to grants.
7
CH4085661EN02-16PP-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.docx 4.10.2016
Other matter - event after balance sheet date
19. The Court presented an event that took place after balance sheet date in an “Other
matter” paragraph in the SARs of the European Banking Authority (EBA) and of the European
Medicines Agency (EMA), which are both located in London. This paragraph deals with the
United Kingdom (UK) referendum that took place on 23 June 2016 and clarifies that the
accounts and related notes of the two agencies were prepared using the information
available at the date of signing of their accounts when the result of UK citizens’ vote were
not yet known and the formal notification of the triggering of Article 50 of the Treaty on
European Union has not been presented9
Comments made in the SARs
.
20. Without calling its opinions into question, the Court made a total of 90 comments
(2014: 79) affecting 36 agencies and the EPF (2014: 35) to highlight matters of importance
and to indicate room for improvement. The number of comments made under the different
headings of the SARs is shown in Chart 1.
9 The accountants signed the accounts on 24 May 2016 (EBA) and 1 June 2016 (EMA).
8
CH4085661EN02-16PP-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.docx 4.10.2016
Chart 1 - Comments by SAR heading
Source: SARs on the agencies annual accounts for the financial year 2015
21. An overview of the comments made for each of the agencies and the EPF is provided
in Annex II
22. The comments considered to be of particular interest are outlined below. They cover
matters of importance which are frequent and/or severe and of wider interest (“lessons to
be learnt”).
.
23. A high level of carry-overs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Reliabil ity ofaccounts
Legality/Regularity Internal controls Budgetarymanagement
Other comments
15
7
44
22
1
8 7
54
20
2014
2015
of committed appropriations remains the most frequent
comment and concerns 32 agencies (2014: 28). The carry-overs under title II (administrative
expenditure) of the 22 agencies concerned (2014: 18) on average amounted to 36 % (2014:
39 %) of committed appropriations, carry-overs under title III (operational expenditure) of
the 18 agencies concerned (2014: 18) on average amounted to 48 % (2014:56 %) of
committed appropriations. These carry-overs mainly result from events (partly) beyond the
agencies’ control (e.g. invoices or cost declarations that had not been received by the year
end) or are explained by the multi-annual nature of operations, procurement procedures or
projects. The Court continued to report on these matters following its internally defined
threshold for the different titles of the agencies’ budget. A change of this reporting
9
CH4085661EN02-16PP-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.docx 4.10.2016
procedure requires a common understanding of the main parties involved (Court,
Parliament, Council and the agencies) as to what should be reported in the agencies’ SARs
on carry-overs. In this context it would be beneficial to elaborate an agreed upon concept of
a “justified carry-over” and to implement this concept in the agencies.
24. The basic rule underlying public procurement
25.
is to ensure competition between
economic operators. The Court reported in four SARs that agencies had not fully complied
with this rule. It referred to the use going beyond of what can be considered exceptional of a
negotiated procedure without publication of a contract notice and highlighted the absence
of competition in case of the use of framework contracts where the services requested or
individual prices have not been clearly defined.
Business continuity encompasses planning and preparation to ensure the continuation
of operations in case of serious incidents or disasters and the ability to recover to an
operational state within a reasonably short period. The Court found that four agencies do
not yet fully comply with the internal control
26. The agencies’ audited annual accounts comprise the financial statements and the
budgetary implementation reports. The Court reported that the
standard dealing with this matter.
budgetary implementation
reports of three agencies differ from the level of detail
Follow-up of previous years’ comments
provided by most other agencies
which hampers comparison between agencies and affects their informative value. The
Commission has planned to issue guidelines on this matter.
27. The SARs for financial year 2015 provide an overview of follow-up actions taken by the
agencies in response to comments from previous years. Annex III
28. Whilst the overall situation has improved compared to the previous year (number of
open comments decreased) the number of outstanding corrective actions increased by three
shows that for the
134 comments open at the end of 2014 (2013: 153), corrective action was completed in
37 cases during 2015. The corrective actions were ongoing for 44 cases and outstanding for
nine cases. No corrective action was required for 44 comments, mainly in relation to carry-
overs of committed appropriations.
10
CH4085661EN02-16PP-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.docx 4.10.2016
comments. An outstanding action implies that no action is planned or ongoing. In five of the
nine cases, the implementation of the required corrective actions depends on the
contribution of a third party (e.g. the hosting Member State, a Court or the legislator) and is
beyond the agencies’ control. In three of the remaining four comments, the agencies
concerned (CPVO and EASO) have not yet taken effective action and in one case, the agency
(EIT) does not agree with the Court’s observation and has not planned any further specific
corrective actions.
CONCLUSIONS
29. The Court issued an unqualified opinion on the annual accounts of all agencies except
Frontex. The transactions underlying the agencies’ accounts were legal and regular for all
agencies except for EIT for which the Court has issued a qualified opinion.
30. Agencies further improved their procedures by taking corrective action in response to
the Court’s comments from previous years. Nevertheless, there is still room for
improvement, as indicated by comments made in 2015.
CH4085661EN02-16AA-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR revws.xlsx 4.10.2016
Agencies' budget and staff (1) Annex I
Agency Parent DG Policy Area 2014 2015 2014 2015(million euro) (million euro) (million euro) (million euro)
Decentralised Agencies
European Medicines Agency – EMA SANTE Health and Consumer Protection 272,0 304,0 752 775
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market – OHIM GROW Internal Market 419,6 384,2 928 998
European Aviation Safety Agency – EASA MOVE Mobility and Transport 162,3 185,4 740 779European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders – FRONTEX
HOME Home Affairs 86,7 143,3 311 309
European Police Office – EUROPOL HOME Home Affairs 84,0 95,0 574 666
European Food Safety Authority – EFSA SANTE Health and Consumer Protection 79,9 78,8 442 434
European Maritime Safety Agency – EMSA MOVE Mobility and Transport 57,9 64,8 245 246
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control – ECDC SANTE Health and Consumer Protection 60,5 58,5 277 260
Translation Centre for the Bodies of the EU – CDT DGT Language Services 56,3 49,6 216 218
European Environment Agency - EEA ENV Environment 52,6 49,2 204 198
The European Union s Judicial Cooperation Unit - EUROJUST JUST Justice 34,0 34,0 252 246
European Chemicals Agency – ECHA GROW Enterprise 113,2 115,1 587 572
European Railway Safety Agency – ERA MOVE Mobility and Transport 25,7 26,3 159 157
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights – FRA JUST Justice 21,5 21,6 110 107
European Banking Authority – EBA FISMAFinancial Services and Capital
Markets 33,6 33,4 146 156
European foundation for improvement of living & working conditions – EUROFOUND EMPL Employment and Social Affairs 21,5 21,2 111 111
European Training Foundation – ETF EAC Education and Culture 22,5 21,0 133 129
European Securities and Markets Authority – ESMA FISMAFinancial Services and Capital
Markets 33,3 36,7 168 186
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training – CEDEFOP EAC Education and Culture 18,4 18,4 120 123
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority – EIOPA FISMA Financial Services and Capital
Markets 21,6 20,2 129 133
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction – EMCDDA HOME Home Affairs 15,7 18,5 101 100
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work – EU-OSHA EMPL Employment and Social Affairs 17,3 16,9 65 65
Community Plant Variety Office – CPVO SANTE Agriculture and Rural
Development14,7 14,7 45 46
European GNSS Agency – GSA GROW Enterprise 403,7 363,8 131 139
European Fisheries Control Agency – EFCA MARE Maritime Affairs & Fisheries 9,2 9,2 58 64
European Institute for Gender equality – EIGE JUST Justice 7,4 7,9 41 42
European Police College – CEPOL HOME Home Affairs 8,9 8,8 43 45
European Network and Information Security Agency – ENISA CNECT Digital Single Market 10,0 10,0 62 69
European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators – ACER ENER Energy 10,9 11,3 72 80
European Asylum Support Office – EASO HOME Home Affairs 15,6 15,9 79 93
Office of the body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications – BEREC CNECT Digital Single Market 4,2 4,0 27 26
European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice - EU-LISA
HOME Home Affairs 64,9 71,7 129 134
Single Resolution Board - SRB (4) FISMAFinancial Services and Capital
Markets n/a 22,0 n/a 108
Executive Agencies
Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency – EACEA EAC & CNECT & HOME & ECHO Education and Culture 46,9 46,9 437 441
Research Executive Agency – REARTD & EAC & GROW & HOME &
CNECT & AGRI Research and Innovation 51,6 54,6 548 618
European Research Council Executive Agency – ERCEA RTD Research and Innovation 36,3 39,6 388 417
Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises - EASME ENTR & RTD & & ENR & ENV &
CLIMA & CNECT & MAREEnergy, Entrepreneurship and
Innovation24,5 36,4 283 373
Innovation and Networks Executive Agency – INEA MOVE & ENER & CNECT & RTD Mobility and Transport 13,4 18,4 151 186
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency – CHAFEA SANTE & JUST & AGRI Consumer Protection 7,2 7,4 49 49
Other Bodies
European Institute of Innovation and Technology – EIT EAC Innovation and Technology 174,9 231,7 48 50
Euratom Supply Agency – EURATOM (4) ENER & RTD Energy and Innovation 0,1 0,1 18 17
Europol Pension Fund – EPF HOMEAdministrative Expenditure of
Europoln/a n/a n/a n/a
Total 2 614,5 2 770,5 9 379 9 965
(1) Source: Data provided by the agencies(2) Budet figures are based on payment appropriations(3) Staff includes officials, temporary and contract staff and seconded national experts(4) SRB and EURATOM are not consolidated in the EU accounts
Staff (3)Budget (2)
CH4085661EN02-16BB-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.xlsx 4.10.2016
Comments made by the Court, not calling its opinion into question Annex II
Procurement procedures Other Internal control
standards Other High carry-overs
High cancellations of 2014 carry-
overs
Budget implementation Budget funding Other SFM Staff matters Other
1 ACER- Ljubljana 2 XX2 BEREC -Riga 3 X X X3 CdT - Luxembourg 4 X X X X4 CEDEFOP - Thessaloniki 2 X X5 CEPOL - Budapest 2 X X6 CHAFEA - Luxembourg 3 XX X7 CPVO - Angers 4 X X X X8 EACEA - Brussels 1 X9 EASA - Koln 2 XX
10 EASME - Brussels 2 X X11 EASO - Valletta 2 X X12 EBA - London 2 X X13 ECDC - Stockholm 4 X XX X 14 ECHA - Helsinki 2 X X15 EEA - Kobenhavn 1 X16 EFCA - Vigo 1 X17 EFSA - Parma 1 X18 EIGE - Vilnius 1 X19 EIOPA - Frankfurt 1 X20 EIT - Budapest 10 X X X XX XX XXX21 EMA - London 022 EMCDDA - Lisboa 1 X23 EMSA - Lisboa 024 ENISA - Heraklion 2 X X25 EPF - The Hague 1 X26 ERA - Valenciennes 027 ERCEA - Brussels 1 X28 ESMA - Paris 2 XX29 ETF - Torino 030 EU-LISA - Tallinn 5 XX X X X31 EU-OSHA - Bilbao 2 XX32 EURATOM - Luxembourg 1 X33 EUROFOUND - Dublin 1 X34 EUROJUST - The Hague 1 X35 EUROPOL - The Hague 1 X36 FRA - Wien 1 X37 FRONTEX - Warsaw 5 XX XX X38 GSA - Prague 6 X X X X X X39 INEA - Brussels 1 X40 OHIM - Alicante 4 X XX X41 REA - Brussels 042 SRB - Brussels 5 X XX X X
1 4 4 4 3 40 3 2 3 6 9 4 71
Reliability of accountsTotal No of comments
Subtotals: 90Totals: 7 548 20
Internal controls Budgetary management Other commentsLegality/Regularity of transactions
CH4085661EN02-16CC-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.xlsx 4.10.2016
Follow-up of open comments not calling the Court’s opinions into question Annex III
Total Completed Ongoing Outstanding N/A
Decentralised Agencies
1 European Medicines Agency – EMA 4 3 1
2 Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market – OHIM 6 3 2 1
3 European Aviation Safety Agency – EASA 4 1 1 2
4 European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders – FRONTEX 8 1 5 1 1
5 European Police Office – EUROPOL 4 1 1 2
6 European Food Safety Authority – EFSA 3 2 1
7 European Maritime Safety Agency – EMSA 1 1
8 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control – ECDC 2 1 1
9 Translations Centre for the Bodies of the EU – CDT 2 1 1
10 European Environment Agency – EEA 8 3 2 1 2
11 European Body for the Enhancement of Judicial Cooperation – EUROJUST 3 2 1
12 European Chemicals Agency – ECHA 2 1 1
13 European Railway Agency – ERA 4 2 2
14 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights – FRA 3 1 2
15 European Banking Authority – EBA 2 1 1
16 European foundation for improvement of living & working conditions – EUROFOUND 3 2 1
17 European Training Foundation – ETF 4 1 1 2
18 European Securities and Markets Authority – ESMA 9 3 4 2
19 European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training – CEDEFOP 0
20 European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority – EIOPA 2 2
21 European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction – EMCDDA 1 1
22 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work – EU-OSHA 2 1 1
23 Community Plant Variety Office – CPVO 2 1 1
24 European GNSS Agency – GSA 3 1 2
25 European Fisheries Control Agency – EFCA 0
26 European Institute for Gender equality – EIGE 1 1
27 European Police College – CEPOL 5 1 4
28 European Network and Information Security Agency – ENISA 2 1 1
29 European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators – ACER 3 1 2
30 European Asylum Support Office – EASO 10 5 2 3
31 Office for the body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications – BEREC 5 3 1 1
32European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice – EU-LISA
5 1 2 2
Executive Agencies
33 Education, Audovisual and Culture Executive Agency – EACEA 1 1
34 Research Executive Agency – REA 0
35 European Research Council Executive Agency – ERCEA 1 1
36 Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises - EASME (previously EACI) 4 2 2
CH4085661EN02-16CC-CH279-16FIN-RAS-Summary_report_2015-OR.xlsx 4.10.2016
37 Innovation and Networks Executive Agency – INEA (previously TEN-TEA) 1 1
38 Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency – CHAFEA (previously EAHC) 1 1
Other Bodies
39 European Institute of Innovation and Technology – EIT 12 5 5 1 1
40 Euratom Supply Agency – EURATOM 0
41 Europol Pension Fund – EPF 1 1
134 37 44 9 44Totals