summary of fs lifetime assessment and activation analysis

14
Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment and Activation Analysis L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison ARIES E-Meeting October 10, 2002 (Full presentation posted @ http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/FTI/POSTERS/OCT2002/lae_lifetime.pdf )

Upload: aolani

Post on 12-Jan-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment and Activation Analysis. L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison ARIES E-Meeting October 10, 2002 (Full presentation posted @ http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/FTI/POSTERS/OCT2002/lae_lifetime.pdf ). Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment and Activation Analysis

Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment and Activation Analysis

L. El-GuebalyFusion Technology Institute

University of Wisconsin - Madison

ARIES E-MeetingOctober 10, 2002

(Full presentation posted @ http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/FTI/POSTERS/OCT2002/lae_lifetime.pdf )

Page 2: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

2

• Assess nuclear performance of structure-free blanket concept using ARIES design rules– Lifetime of FS based on radiation damage:

• dpa

• Helium production

– Breeding potential of candidate breeders:• Flibe

• Flinabe.

– Waste disposal rating of FS-based components (shield, nozzles, feeding tubes).

• Estimate reduction in waste for thick liquid wall concept.

ObjectivesObjectives

Page 3: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

3

ARIES Requirements and Design LimitsARIES Requirements and Design Limits

dpa* to: ODS-FS structure ≤ 200 dpa304-SS structure ≤ 25 dpa

Overall TBR ≥ 1.08

Helium production for reweldability of FS ≤ 1 He appm

WDR for Class C low level waste ≤ 1___________________

* Thermal creep strength @ EOL could be more restrictive than radiation damage, per M. Billone (ANL).

Page 4: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

4

Key ParametersKey Parameters

Target yield 458.7 MJ

Rep rate 4 Hz

Average source neutron energy 11.75 MeV

Penetrations coverage 3%

Plant lifetime 40 FPY

Availability 85%

Page 5: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

5

Schematic of Radial BuildSchematic of Radial Build

FS Shield(90% FS, 10% Liquid)

GapTarget

Liquid Blanket Jets(58% Liquid, 42% void)

0.5 m Radius

3 m Radius

|||

Nozzles |

Page 6: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

6

83 cm Thick Flibe and 150 cm Thick Flinabe Meet ARIES Breeding Requirement

83 cm Thick Flibe and 150 cm Thick Flinabe Meet ARIES Breeding Requirement

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

50 100 150 200

Overall TBR

Liquid Blanket Thickness (cm)

Flibe Required

TBR

Flinabe

Page 7: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

7

dpa Limit Can be Met with 85-130 cm Flibe Blanket and 150 cm Flinabe Blanket

dpa Limit Can be Met with 85-130 cm Flibe Blanket and 150 cm Flinabe Blanket

• 85 cm Flibe blanket meets FS 200 dpa limit.

• 130 cm Flibe overbreeding blanket meets 304-SS 25 dpa limit.

• 1.5 m Flinabe blanket meets both limits.

100

101

102

103

104

50 100 150 200

Peak dpa to FS Structure(dpa @ 40 FPY)

Liquid Blanket Thickness (cm)

Flibe

FS Limit

Flinabe304-SS Limit

Page 8: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

8

Lifetime of Steel StructureBased on Radiation DamageLifetime of Steel Structure

Based on Radiation Damage

Breeder Flibe Flinabe

Blanket Thickness 85 cm 130 cm* 150 cm(meets both breeding requirement and dpa limit)

Overall TBR 1.08 1.23 1.08

ODS-FS 40 FPY >> 40 FPY

304-SS 40 FPY 55 FPY_________________

* Overbreeding blanket.

Page 9: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

9

Helium Production is ExcessiveHelium Production is Excessive

Innermost shield layer/nozzles/feeding tubes

cannot be re-welded at any time during operation.

10-1

100

101

102

103

104

50 100 150 200

Peak Helium Production at FSStructure (appm @ 40 FPY)

Liquid Blanket Thickness (cm)

Flibe

FS Reweldability Limit

Flinabe

Page 10: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

10

Steel Composition (in wt%) Steel Composition (in wt%)

Fe 83.818 87.891 70.578C 0.052 0.04 0.046N 0.014 0.005 0.038O 0.16 0.13 –Si 0.1 0.24 0.47P – 0.005 0.026S 0.001 0.002 0.012Ti 0.35 0.09 0.03V 0.01 0.29 –Cr 12.58 8.7 17.7Mn 0.05 0.45 1.17Co – 0.0028 0.1Ni 0.27 0.0474 9.3Cu 0.02 0.01 0.2Nb 0.01 0.00033 –Mo 0.02 0.0021 0.33Ta – 0.08 –W 2.44 2 –Y 0.16 0.7 –

_____________________________________________________

* R. Klueh et al., “Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Oxide Dispersion-Strengthened Steels” fusion materials semiannual progress report for the period ending June 30, 2000 (DOE/ER-0313/28), pp. 123-130. Fe-12Cr-3W-0.4Ti-0.25Y2O3 (12YWT) experimental alloy.

** IEA Modified F82H FS + 0.25wt% Y2O3, per M. Billone (ANL). Other elements include: B, Al, As, Pd, Ag, Cd, Sn, Sb, Os, Ir, Bi, Eu, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, U.

# Starfire report: C. Baker et. al, "Starfire-A Commercial Tokamak Fusion Power Plant Study," Argonne National Laboratory Report, ANL/FPP-80-1 (1980).

ODS-12YWT-FS*

(Experimental Alloy)304-SS#ODS M-F82H-FS**

Page 11: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

11

All Steel Alloys Generate High Level WasteAll Steel Alloys Generate High Level Waste

• ODS-MF82H-FS offers lowest WDR.• Thicker Flinabe blanket results in lower WDR.• Main contributors to WDR: 94Nb (from Nb), 99Tc (from Mo), and

192nIr (from W).• Potential solutions to meet waste requirement (WDR < 1):

– Control Mo and Nb, – Thicken blanket (and readjust TBR).

10-1

100

101

102

103

0 20 40 60 80 100

WDR of Shield Structure

Shield Thickness (cm)

85 cm Flibe, 40 FPY

304-SS

Class C Limit

ODS-12YWT-FS|

Nozzles

ODS-MF82H-FS

10-1

100

101

102

103

0 20 40 60 80 100

WDR of Shield Structure

Shield Thickness (cm)

150 cm Flinabe , 40 FPY

304-SS

Class C Limit

ODS-12YWT-FS

|Nozzles

ODS-MF82H-FS

Page 12: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

12

Effect of Mo and Nb on WDREffect of Mo and Nb on WDR

• In practice, Mo and Nb impurities cannot be zeroed out. Actual level depends on $/kg to keep Mo and Nb < 1 wppm.

• Flibe shield with Mo/Nb control should be > 50 cm thick to qualify as LLW.• Flinabe shield without Mo/Nb control meets waste requirement if ≥ 45 cm

thick.• Nozzles/feeding tubes generate high level waste unless protected by thicker

blanket or mixed with shield and disposed as single unit at EOL.

10-2

10-1

100

101

0 20 40 60 80 100

WDR of ODS-F82H-FS Structure

Shield Thickness (cm)

w/ Mo and Nb

Class C Limit

85 cm Flibe, ODS-MF82H-FS, 40 FPY

w/o Mo and Nb

|Nozzles

10-2

10-1

100

101

0 20 40 60 80 100

WDR of ODS-F82H-FS Structure

Shield Thickness (cm)

w/ Mo and NbClass C Limit

150 cm Flinabe, ODS-MF82H-FS, 40 FPY

w/o Mo and Nb

|Nozzles

Page 13: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

13

• Thick liquid wall concept developed to eliminate blanket replacement, reduce waste, and increase availability by 10% 20% lower COE, per R. Moir (UCRL-JC-115748, April 1994).

• In IFE solid wall designs, blanket generates only 2-4% of total waste Thick liquid wall concept offers small waste reduction. (same conclusion made for MFE - APEX project)

Insignificant difference in waste volume generated by thin and thick liquid wall concepts.

Revisiting Logic Behind Thick Liquid Wall Concept

Revisiting Logic Behind Thick Liquid Wall Concept

HYLIFE-II

101

102

103

104

105

4 5 6 7 8

Cumulative Compacted WasteVolume (m

3)

Chamber Wall Radius (m)

Shield

Blanket

Building

Total

Target (w/o recycling)

Thin Liquid Wall Concept

Page 14: Summary of FS Lifetime Assessment   and Activation Analysis

14

• Class C LLW requirement is more restrictive than breeding and dpa requirements.

• No breeding problem identified for Flibe and Flinabe. • 85/150 cm thick Flibe/Flinabe blankets provide TBR of

1.08 and meet FS dpa limit. • Helium production in FS is excessive and precludes FS

reweldability during operation.• All steel alloys produce high level waste (WDR >> 1).

Low level waste can be achieved with combination of Mo/Nb control and blanket/shield adjustment.

• Nozzles/Feeding tubes need additional protection to qualify as LLW unless combined with shield.

• Both thin and thick liquid wall concepts generate ~ same volume of waste.

ConclusionsConclusions