summary of active proposals - arin.net filezthis policy proposal provides clear policy authority to...

Summary of Active Summary of Active ProposalsProposals

Albuquerque, New MexicoARIN XX

Policy Proposal 2006Policy Proposal 2006--77Changes to IPv6 initial allocation Changes to IPv6 initial allocation

criteriacriteria

Revise ProposalRevise ProposalCommunity ConsensusCommunity ConsensusNot RevisedNot RevisedLast RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXSubsequent PPM DiscussionSubsequent PPM Discussion

ARIN XIXARIN XIXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion13 OCT 0613 OCT 06Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal11 OCT 0611 OCT 06Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML

Proposal Text In Meeting PacketProposal Text In Meeting Packethttp://www.arin.net/policy/2006_7.htmlhttp://www.arin.net/policy/2006_7.html


Policy Proposal 2006Policy Proposal 2006--77DescriptionDescription

Adds to the list of criteria for an initial allocation Adds to the list of criteria for an initial allocation of IPv6 address space (NRPM section 6.5.1.1.). of IPv6 address space (NRPM section 6.5.1.1.). Specifically, in addition to the common criteria, if Specifically, in addition to the common criteria, if an ISP is not known, nor can it provide a plan, it an ISP is not known, nor can it provide a plan, it can instead attempt to justify intent to announce can instead attempt to justify intent to announce the address space within one year. the address space within one year.

**********************************************************************AC ShepherdsAC Shepherds

Lea RobertsLea RobertsRobert SeastromRobert Seastrom


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--1313Removal of ISP Immediate Need from Removal of ISP Immediate Need from

EndEnd--UserUser

Not RevisedNot RevisedLast RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion18 MAY 0718 MAY 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal25 APR 0725 APR 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML




ARIN staff understands that this proposal would ARIN staff understands that this proposal would remove NRPM Section "4.3.4 Additional remove NRPM Section "4.3.4 Additional considerations" in order to remove text that considerations" in order to remove text that conflicts with Section "4.2.1.6 Immediate need".conflicts with Section "4.2.1.6 Immediate need".


Stacy TaylorStacy TaylorLeo BicknellLeo Bicknell


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--1414Resource Review ProcessResource Review Process

Not RevisedNot RevisedLast RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion24 JUL 0724 JUL 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal01 MAY 0701 MAY 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML




This policy proposal provides clear policy authority to This policy proposal provides clear policy authority to audit or reclaim resources, guidelines for how it shall be audit or reclaim resources, guidelines for how it shall be done, and a guarantee of a (minimum) sixdone, and a guarantee of a (minimum) six--month grace month grace period so that the current user shall have time to stop period so that the current user shall have time to stop using any resources to be reclaimed. using any resources to be reclaimed.


Robert SeastromRobert SeastromLeo BicknellLeo Bicknell


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--1515Authentication of Legacy ResourcesAuthentication of Legacy Resources

31 AUG 0731 AUG 07Last RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion24 JUL 0724 JUL 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal09 JUL 0709 JUL 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML




ARIN staff understands that the proposal would add new ARIN staff understands that the proposal would add new sections to the NRPM, 4.9 regarding legacy resources. sections to the NRPM, 4.9 regarding legacy resources. The purpose is to encourage "legacy resource holders" to The purpose is to encourage "legacy resource holders" to sign the RSA. sign the RSA.


Alec PetersonAlec PetersonPaul AndersenPaul Andersen


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--1616IPv4 Soft LandingIPv4 Soft Landing

Not RevisedNot RevisedLast RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion28 AUG 0728 AUG 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal11 MAY 0711 MAY 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML




The proposal "aims to provide for a The proposal "aims to provide for a defined transition away from IPv4 address defined transition away from IPv4 address space towards IPv6 address space by space towards IPv6 address space by imposing increasingly stricter imposing increasingly stricter requirements for new address allocations." requirements for new address allocations."


Bill DarteBill DartePaul AndersenPaul Andersen


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--1717Legacy Outreach and Partial Legacy Outreach and Partial

ReclamationReclamation

17 SEP 0717 SEP 07Last RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion28 AUG 0728 AUG 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal29 JUN 0729 JUN 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML




ARIN staff understands that the proposal would modify ARIN staff understands that the proposal would modify NRPM Section 4.6. Ignoring the parts that concern fees NRPM Section 4.6. Ignoring the parts that concern fees and waivers, the proposal would change the current and waivers, the proposal would change the current policy by removing the defined timeframe for returning policy by removing the defined timeframe for returning address space to ARIN. address space to ARIN.


Cathy AronsonCathy AronsonLea RobertsLea Roberts


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--1818Global Policy for the Allocation of the Global Policy for the Allocation of the

Remaining IPv4 Address SpaceRemaining IPv4 Address Space(Global Proposal)(Global Proposal)

Not RevisedNot RevisedLast RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion28 AUG 0728 AUG 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal20 JUL 0720 JUL 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML




ARIN staff understands that this proposal is a global ARIN staff understands that this proposal is a global proposal. It would reserve a certain number of /8s in the proposal. It would reserve a certain number of /8s in the IANA pool to be allocated to the RIRs when the IANA pool to be allocated to the RIRs when the remaining IANA /8s run out. The suggested reserve is remaining IANA /8s run out. The suggested reserve is 25 /8s, 5 per each RIR. When the IANA can not fulfill the 25 /8s, 5 per each RIR. When the IANA can not fulfill the last RIR request, they will give what they can to that RIR. last RIR request, they will give what they can to that RIR. The IANA will then allocate the 5 /8s to each RIR.The IANA will then allocate the 5 /8s to each RIR.


Matt PounsettMatt PounsettBill DarteBill Darte


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--1919IANA Policy for Allocation of ASN IANA Policy for Allocation of ASN

Blocks to RIRsBlocks to RIRs(Global Proposal)(Global Proposal)





ARIN staff understands that this proposal would create ARIN staff understands that this proposal would create policy for IANA to RIRs regarding allocations of ASNs. policy for IANA to RIRs regarding allocations of ASNs. Block size is 1024. Allocations for 12 months need. Until Block size is 1024. Allocations for 12 months need. Until 31 Dec 2009, allocations of 231 Dec 2009, allocations of 2--byte and 4byte and 4--byte blocks are byte blocks are separate. RIRs request additional ASNs when either at separate. RIRs request additional ASNs when either at 80% or at less than two months need.80% or at less than two months need.


Dan AlexanderDan AlexanderHeather SchillerHeather Schiller


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--2121PIv6 for legacy holders with RSA and PIv6 for legacy holders with RSA and

efficient useefficient use





ARIN staff understands that this proposal would make ARIN staff understands that this proposal would make direct assignments of IPv6 space available to any direct assignments of IPv6 space available to any organization with an efficiently utilized v4 assignment or organization with an efficiently utilized v4 assignment or allocation covered under an RSA.allocation covered under an RSA.


Suzanne WoolfSuzanne WoolfRon da SilvaRon da Silva


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--2222Expand Timeframe of Additional Expand Timeframe of Additional

RequestsRequests

Not RevisedNot RevisedLast RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion28 AUG 0728 AUG 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal14 AUG 0714 AUG 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML



Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--22 22 DescriptionDescription

ARIN staff understands that the proposal would change ARIN staff understands that the proposal would change the allocation timeframe in 4.2.4.4 from six months to the allocation timeframe in 4.2.4.4 from six months to 12.12.


Marla AzingerMarla AzingerMatt PounsettMatt Pounsett


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--2323End Policy for IANA IPv4 allocations to End Policy for IANA IPv4 allocations to

RIRsRIRs(Global Proposal)(Global Proposal)

Not RevisedNot RevisedLast RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion28 AUG 0728 AUG 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal17 AUG 0717 AUG 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML




ARIN staff understands that this policy would have IANA ARIN staff understands that this policy would have IANA allocate a single /8 to each of the 5 RIRs at the point allocate a single /8 to each of the 5 RIRs at the point when the IANA free pool hits 5 /8s.when the IANA free pool hits 5 /8s.


Dan AlexanderDan AlexanderRobert SeastromRobert Seastrom


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--2424IPv6 Assignment GuidelinesIPv6 Assignment Guidelines

Not RevisedNot RevisedLast RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion05 SEP 0705 SEP 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal17 AUG 0717 AUG 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML




ARIN staff understands that this proposal would replace ARIN staff understands that this proposal would replace 6.5.4.1. Instead of the assignment size being a decision 6.5.4.1. Instead of the assignment size being a decision of the LIR or ISP, the actual prefix to be assigned would of the LIR or ISP, the actual prefix to be assigned would be based on a subnet count.be based on a subnet count.


Ron da SilvaRon da SilvaStacy TaylorStacy Taylor


Policy Proposal 2007Policy Proposal 2007--2525IPv6 Policy HousekeepingIPv6 Policy Housekeeping

Not RevisedNot RevisedLast RevisionLast RevisionARIN XXARIN XXFirst PPM DiscussionFirst PPM Discussion05 SEP 0705 SEP 07Designated Formal ProposalDesignated Formal Proposal17 AUG 0717 AUG 07Introduced on PPMLIntroduced on PPML




ARIN staff understands that this proposal would make ARIN staff understands that this proposal would make the following changes to the IPv6 section of the NRPM: the following changes to the IPv6 section of the NRPM:

Removes the prefix size from the initial IPv6 allocation criteriRemoves the prefix size from the initial IPv6 allocation criteria,a,Moves a modified version of 6.5.3 to a new location (6.5.4.4),Moves a modified version of 6.5.3 to a new location (6.5.4.4),Establishes criteria for Establishes criteria for direct assignmentsdirect assignments larger than a /48 (.94 larger than a /48 (.94 HDHD--Ratio), andRatio), andMakes reserved space (from the /44s) available for other use.Makes reserved space (from the /44s) available for other use.


Lea RobertsLea RobertsStacy TaylorStacy Taylor


Thank YouThank You

summary of active proposals - arin.net filezthis policy proposal provides clear policy authority to...

Documents