Subsidence in Food Processing & Training Center, Sitapur

Constructed by U.P. Project Corporation Department had refused to take

possession

Worst Performing District : Sitapur

Contd…

Failure to payback the first loan prevented loan disbursement to any other member, rendering the huge amount of revolving fund (Rs. 80.75 lakhs) unutilized. Consequently, not only this ambitious scheme failed measurably, but also blocked a substantial amount of RSVY fund.

Objective: AI, Vaccination, balanced diet & better fodder species Coverage: 10 blocks (20 Nyay Panchayats)

40 Rearer Group/Nyay Panchayat; 1 Gopal Group/blockRevolving Fund Rs. 10000/- per Rearer Group (Rs. 80 lakhs)Rs. 50000/- per Gopal Group (Rs. 5 lakhs)

Gopal Yojna (Rs. 129.25 lakhs)

Only 5% loan to be given at a time No further loan was allowed till the previous one is returned

Worst Performing District : Sitapur

Major Bottlenecks

Lack of Proper Planning Lack of community involvement Overburdened staff Delayed release of funds Frequent transfers of key

functionaries Lack of inter-sectoral coordination

Lessons Learnt (Do’s & Don’ts)

Assigning works to non-specialized agencies

Use of inexperienced NGOs Transfers of key functionaries

during project period

Don’ts

Lessons Learnt (Do’s & Don’ts)

Need-based participatory planning Community involvement at all stages Use of professional agencies in planning Dedicated staff for RSVY type programs Improved co-ordination at all levels

Do’s

Lessons Learnt (Do’s & Don’ts)

Earmarking separate maintenance funds Provision of social audit Involvement of only competent NGOs Proper MIS/record keeping

Do’s