subject: update on digital implementationintroduction of setda network specifications; student to...

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Update

February 18, 2013 SUBJECT: Update on Digital Implementation

PROPOSED BOARD ACTION N/A AUTHORITY FOR STATE BOARD ACTION N/A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The status of the implementation of the digital learning infrastructure will be provided. To date the following goals have been set and districts have reported their progress as shown:

Technology goals have been established for hardware and networking through years 2017-18

Current District Achievements o 2.91 students to 1 computer o 80% of schools have met the network bandwidth goal for 2012-13 o 52% have met the network bandwidth goal for 2014-15

2014-2015 Goals o 2 students to 1 computer o 100Mbps per 1000 students

2017-2018 Goals o 1 students to 1 computer o 1000Mbps per 1000 students

√ Completed Ongoing

Supporting Documentation Included: Digital Implementation power point (pg. 161), Digital Learning Standard Readiness Gauge Data Sheet (pg. 175), Digital Learning Readiness Gauge Indicators – Leaders (pg. 177), and Digital Learning Infrastructure Gantt Chart (pg. 179). Facilitator/Presenter: David Stokes, Chief Information Officer

State Board of Education State Board of Education Update on Digital ImplementationUpdate on Digital Implementation

February 18, 2013February 18, 2013

David Stokes, Chief Information OfficerDavid Stokes, Chief Information Officer

2

Agendag

• 2012 Technology Resource SurveyDigital Learning Readiness Gauge• Digital Learning Readiness Gauge

• Current Activities

3

2012 Technology Resources Surveygy y

• Completion of the annual 2012 Technology Resources Survey with 98% participation from Resources Survey with 98% participation from Florida school districts.▫ Higher than average participation in response to 2013-2014 g g p p p 3 4

LBR for Education Technology Modernization Initiative▫ 2012 TRS focused on bandwidth ranges and number of

computer devices that were within the PARCC computer devices that were within the PARCC configuration specifications.

4

2012 Technology Resources Surveygy y2012 School Survey Results 2011 School Survey Results

904 791 d i t ifi ti 923 146 d i t ifi ti904,791 devices met specifications 923,146 devices met specifications

180,330 devices did not meet specifications

114,058 devices did not meetspecificationsp p

297,975 wireless configurations 266,664 wireless configurations

3,523 schools responded 3,433 schools responded

2,636,328 student enrollment K-12 2,649,429 student enrollment K-12

5

2012 Technology Resources Survey (TRS)(TRS)

2012 Technology Goals 2012 School Survey Results

100 Percent of Schools meeting Bandwidth

Standards: 50 Mbps per 1000 80% of Schools have 50 Mbps per

1000 StudentsStudents

1000 Students

2.75 Students to 1 Computer 2.91 Students to 1 Computer(Last Year 2.8 to 1)

6

2012 Technology Resources Surveygy y2014 Technology Goals 2012 School Survey Results

100 Percent of Schools meeting Bandwidth

Standards: 100 Mbps per 52% of Schools have 100 Mbps per

1000 Students1000 Students

1000 Students

2 Students to 1 Computer 2.91 Students to 1 Computer

7

Technology Resources Survey

http://www.flinnovates.org/survey/

Florida Innovates

8

Florida Innovates• Continual support of the Florida Innovate tools such as

the Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills (ITTS) and the Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills (ITTS) and Student Tool for Technology Literacy (ST2L) for school districts who still use these tools.

9

http://flccss.org/welcome/

10

Current Activities• Building District Relationships▫ Attending Conferences▫ Attending Conferences

Florida IT Association for Florida Educators (FAEDS)Florida Education Technology Conference (FETC)

▫ Participating in district technology blogs M b hi▫ Memberships

Consortium for School Networking (COSN)Florida Council of Instructional Leaders (FCITL)Florida Council of Instructional Leaders (FCITL)

11

Current Activities (Continued)

• Working to identify solutions to train teachers on how to use technology as part of their on how to use technology as part of their curriculum ▫ IT AcademyIT Academy▫ Microsoft Partners in Learning

• Documenting problem statements as shared by g p ythe districts CIO/CTO

• Discussing the idea of establishing a quarterly webinar with the districts CIO/CTO

12

Current Activities (Continued)

• Working with Department of Management ServicesServices▫ E-Rate▫ Solutions to provide broadband to rural areasSolutions to provide broadband to rural areas

• Establishing secured cloud based solutions• Identifying common use of software that could y g

be purchased at group pricing

Organization Chart

13

Organization Chart

D id S kD id S kDavid Stokes

CIO

David Stokes

CIO

Ted Duncan

Deputy CIO

Ted Duncan

Deputy CIO

Districts

Dale Peace

Educational Technology

Dale Peace


CIO/CTO

Debra Joullian


Debra Joullian

Educational TechnologyTechnologyTechnology

14

Technology Funding Recommendations

• Priority 1▫ Teacher Training▫ Teacher Training▫ Internet Bandwidth

• Priority 2Priority 2▫ High Capacity Wireless

• Priority 3y 3▫ Devices

DIGITAL LEARNING STANDARD READINESS GAUGE DATA SHEET January 2013

Green Yellow Red Total

Green Yellow Red Total

Number of Submissions

Green Yellow Red TotalElementary

4 2 4

Orange

7 17Student Computer Ratio

11 1 2 1 15Computer Best Testing Success

6 1 1 10 18Bring Your Own Device Policies

4 3 1 9 17Broadband Speed

7 2 2 6 17High Speed Wireless

2 8 4 2 16Home Internet Access

Middle

6 2 3

Orange







High

6 2 3

Orange







Percent Submitted

Green Yellow Orange Red Total

6% 3% 6% 10% 25%

15% 1% 3% 1% 20%

8% 1% 1% 14% 24%

6% 4% 1% 13% 24%

10% 3% 3% 8% 24%

3% 11% 6% 3% 23%


8% 3% 4% 8% 23%

22% 0% 1% 0% 23%

11% 1% 4% 7% 23%

10% 4% 1% 8% 23%

14% 3% 1% 6% 24%

4% 14% 3% 1% 22%


8% 3% 4% 8% 23%

22% 0% 1% 0% 23%

13% 1% 3% 7% 24%

10% 4% 1% 8% 23%

14% 4% 0% 6% 24%

6% 13% 3% 1% 23%

Digital Learning Readiness Gauge Indicators Leaders

The Digital Learning Readiness Gauge will use key indicators toassist districts as they implement digital learning initiatives as well as communicate activities and progress to stakeholders. Each indicator will be reported at the district level and byschool level. School levels will include: Elementary (K‐5),Middle (6‐8) and High (9‐12). Indicators will be compared against the following scale: Green – 75% to 100%, Yellow‐ 50% to 74%, Orange – 25% to 49%, and Red – 0% to 24%. Eachindicator will be marked red/orange/yellow/green based on meeting the current requirements for that indicator. As technology changes and expectations/needs increase, thestandards for each indicator may increase/change.

1. Student Computer Ratio FLDOE Contact: Ted Duncan, Deputy Chief Information Officer

Percent of schools that meet or exceed the minimum standard Student to Computer ratio

For School Year 201213 – the standard is 2.75 students to 1 computer

• Count of schools in a district that meet current year targets for computers to 1 student ratio or below

• Computers can be mobile or desktops and must be for student use and meet the minimum computer standards set in the Technology Resource Survey (TRS) for the current year

• Includes school student counts in Survey 3 data

2. Computer Best Testing Success FDOE Contact: Debra Joullian, Education Technology Analyst

Percent of schools that have no issues for current FCAT and EOC exams in school year 2012‐13(Computer‐Based Testing (CBT) Certification Tool Fall 2012)

• Devices must meet the minimum standards set in the CBT Certification Tool for the current year

• Includes computers that can typically be used for online testing

1*TRS refers to the Technology Readiness Survey completed by districts in December 2012.

3. Bring Your Own Device Policies FDOE Contact: Dale Peace, Education Technology Manager

Percent of schools with Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies (TRS #6)

• Includes schools that allow students to bring personal mobile devices and/or schools that have written policy on bringing personal mobile devices

4. Broadband Speed FDOE Contact: Dale Peace, Education Technology Manager

Percent of schools that meet or exceed the minimum K‐12 Broadband bandwidth standard (TRS #23)

For School Year 201213 standard is 50mbps/1000 students

• Count of schools in a district that meet current year targets for bandwidth ratio or above

5. High Speed Wireless FDOE Contact: Ted Duncan, Deputy Chief Information Officer

Percent of schools that support High Speed Wireless (TRS #2)

• Count of schools that support a large number of the devices with internet access through wireless connections

6. Home Internet Access FDOE Contact: Ted Duncan, Deputy Chief Information Officer

Percent of students that have internet access at home (TRS # 10)

• Count of schools with a large number of students with internet access at home

2*TRS refers to the Technology Readiness Survey completed by districts in December 2012.

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

SUPPORT DIGITAL LEARNING INFRASTRUCTURE GANTT CHART

Online Readiness Gauge to Track and Share District Progress on Digital Learning Activities

Student to Computer Ratio Goals: 3 Students to 1 Computer

Student to Computer Ratio Goals: 2.87 Students to 1 Computer

Introduction of PARCC Hardware Computer Specifications

Introduction of SETDA Network Specifications

Student to Computer Ratio Goals : 2.75 Students to 1 Computer

100 Percent of Schools Meeting Bandwidth Standards: 50 Mbps per 1000 Students

Student to Computer Ratio Goals : 2.25 Students to 1 Computer as noted in LRPP

75 Percent of Schools meeting Bandwidth Standards:100 Mbps per 1000 Students

Meet 2014‐15 Goal of SETDA Network Specification

Student to Computer Ratio Goals : 2 Students to 1 Computer as noted in LRPP

100 Percent of Schools meeting Bandwidth Standards: 100 Mbps per 1000 Students

subject: update on digital implementationintroduction of setda network specifications; student to...

Documents