subir sachdev

27
Subir Sachdev Science 286, 2479 (1999). Quantum phase transitions in atomic gases and condensed matter Transparencies online at http://pantheon.yale. edu/~subir Quantum Phase Transitions Cambridge University Press

Upload: tea

Post on 25-Feb-2016

55 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Quantum phase transitions in atomic gases and condensed matter . Subir Sachdev. Science 286 , 2479 (1999). . Quantum Phase Transitions Cambridge University Press. Transparencies online at http://pantheon.yale.edu/~subir. E. E. g. g. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Subir Sachdev

Subir Sachdev

Science 286, 2479 (1999).

Quantum phase transitions in atomic gases and condensed matter

Transparencies online at http://pantheon.yale.edu/~subir

Quantum Phase Transitions Cambridge University Press

Page 2: Subir Sachdev

What is a quantum phase transition ?

Non-analyticity in ground state properties as a function of some control parameter g

E

g

True level crossing:

Usually a first-order transition

E

g

Avoided level crossing which becomes sharp in the infinite

volume limit:

second-order transition

Page 3: Subir Sachdev

T Quantum-critical

Why study quantum phase transitions ?

• Theory for a quantum system with strong correlations: describe phases on either side of gc by expanding in deviation from the quantum critical point.

• Critical point is a novel state of matter without quasiparticle excitations

• Critical excitations control dynamics in the wide quantum-critical region at non-zero temperatures.

ggc

~ zcg g

Important property of ground state at g=gc : temporal and spatial scale invariance;

characteristic energy scale at other values of g:

Page 4: Subir Sachdev

OutlineI. The quantum Ising chain.

II. The superfluid-insulator transition

III. Quantum transitions without local order parameters: fractionalization.

IV. Conclusions

Page 5: Subir Sachdev

I. Quantum Ising Chain

Degrees of freedom: 1 qubits, "large"

,

1 1 or , 2 2

j j

j jj j j j

j N N

0

Hamiltonian of decoupled qubits:

xj

j

H J 2J

j

j

Page 6: Subir Sachdev

1 1

Coupling between qubits:

z zj j

j

H Jg

1 1

Prefers neighboring qubits

are

(not entangle

d)j j j j

either or

1 1j j j j

0 1H H H Full Hamiltonian

leads to entangled states at g of order unity

Page 7: Subir Sachdev

Weakly-coupled qubits Ground state:

2

G

g

Lowest excited states:

jj

Coupling between qubits creates “flipped-spin” quasiparticle states at momentum p

Entire spectrum can be constructed out of multi-quasiparticle states

jipxj

j

p e

2 2

2

Excitation energy 4 sin2

Excitation gap 2 2

pap gJ O g

J gJ O g

p

a

a

p

1g

Page 8: Subir Sachdev

Dynamic Structure Factor :

Cross-section to flip a to a (or vice versa)

while transferring energy

and momentum

( , )

p

S p

,S p Z p

Three quasiparticlecontinuum

Quasiparticle pole

Structure holds to all orders in g

At 0, collisions between quasiparticles broaden pole to a Lorentzian of width 1 where the

21is given by

Bk TB

T

k Te

phase coherence time

S. Sachdev and A.P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2220 (1997)

~3

Weakly-coupled qubits 1g

Page 9: Subir Sachdev

Ground states:

1 2

G

g

Lowest excited states: domain walls

jjd Coupling between qubits creates new “domain-

wall” quasiparticle states at momentum pjipx

jj

p e d

2 1

1

Excitation energy 4 sin2

Excitation gap 2 2

pap J O g

gJ J O g

p

a

a

p

Second state obtained by

and mix only at order N

G

G G g

0

Ferromagnetic moment

0zN G G

Strongly-coupled qubits 1g

Page 10: Subir Sachdev

Dynamic Structure Factor :

Cross-section to flip a to a (or vice versa)

while transferring energy

and momentum

( , )

p

S p

,S p 22

0 2N p

Two domain-wall continuum

Structure holds to all orders in 1/g

At 0, motion of domain walls leads to a finite ,

21and broadens coherent peak to a width 1 where Bk TB

T

k Te

phase coherence time

S. Sachdev and A.P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2220 (1997)

~2

Strongly-coupled qubits 1g

Page 11: Subir Sachdev

Entangled states at g of order unity

ggc

“Flipped-spin” Quasiparticle

weight Z

1/ 4~ cZ g g

A.V. Chubukov, S. Sachdev, and J.Ye, Phys. Rev. B 49, 11919 (1994)

ggc

Ferromagnetic moment N0

1/80 ~ cN g g

P. Pfeuty Annals of Physics, 57, 79 (1970)

ggc

Excitation energy gap ~ cg g

Page 12: Subir Sachdev

Dynamic Structure Factor :

Cross-section to flip a to a (or vice versa)

while transferring energy

and momentum

( , )

p

S p

,S p

Critical coupling cg g

c p

7 /8~ c p

No quasiparticles --- dissipative critical continuum

Page 13: Subir Sachdev

Quasiclassical dynamics

Quasiclassical dynamics

0

7 / 4

( ) , 0

1Phase coherence time given by 2 ta

1 ...

n16

z z i tj

B

kk

k

i dt t e

AT

T

i

S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2411 (1992).

S. Sachdev and A.P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2220 (1997).

Crossovers at nonzero temperature

Page 14: Subir Sachdev

II. The Superfluid-Insulator transition

Degrees of freedom: Bosons, , hopping between the

sites, , of a lattice, with short-range repulsive interactions.

- ( 1)2

j

i j jj j

ji j

j

b

b b n n

jU nH t

† j j jn b b

Boson Hubbard model

For small U/t, ground state is a superfluid BEC with

superfluid density density of bosons

M.PA. Fisher, P.B. Weichmann, G. Grinstein, and D.S. Fisher

Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989).

Page 15: Subir Sachdev

What is the ground state for large U/t ?

Typically, the ground state remains a superfluid, but with

superfluid density density of bosons

The superfluid density evolves smoothly from large values at small U/t, to small values at large U/t, and there is no quantum phase transition at any intermediate value of U/t.(In systems with Galilean invariance and at zero temperature, superfluid density=density of bosons always, independent of the strength of the interactions)

Page 16: Subir Sachdev

What is the ground state for large U/t ?

Incompressible, insulating ground states, with zero superfluid density, appear at special commensurate densities

3jn tU

7 / 2jn Ground state has “density wave” order, which spontaneously breaks lattice symmetries

Page 17: Subir Sachdev

Excitations of the insulator: infinitely long-lived, finite energy quasiparticles and quasiholes

2

, , *,

Energy of quasi-particles/holes: 2p h p h

p h

ppm

Page 18: Subir Sachdev

Boson Green's function : Cross-section to add a boson while transferring energy and momentum

( , )

p

G p

Continuum of two quasiparticles +

one quasihole

,G p Z p

Quasiparticle pole

~3

Insulating ground state

Similar result for quasi-hole excitations obtained by removing a boson

Page 19: Subir Sachdev

Entangled states at of order unity

ggc

Quasiparticle weight Z

~ cZ g g

ggc

Superfluid density s

( 2)~ d zs cg g

ggc

Excitation energy gap

,

,

~ for

=0 for p h c c

p h c

g g g g

g g

/g t U

Page 20: Subir Sachdev

Quasiclassical dynamics

Quasiclassical dynamics

Relaxational dynamics ("Bose molasses") with phase coherence/relaxation time given by

1 Universal number 1 K 20.9kHzBk T

S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2411 (1992).K. Damle and S. SachdevPhys. Rev. B 56, 8714 (1997).

Crossovers at nonzero temperature

2

Conductivity (in d=2) = universal functionB

Qh k T

M.P.A. Fisher, G. Girvin, and G. Grinstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 587 (1990).K. Damle and S. Sachdev Phys. Rev. B 56, 8714 (1997).

Page 21: Subir Sachdev

II. Quantum transitions without local order parameters: fractionalization

S=1/2 spins on coupled 2-leg ladders

jiij

ij SSJH

'JJ

e.g. SrCu2O3

''J'''J

Page 22: Subir Sachdev

Ground state for J large

2

1

S=0 quantum paramagnet

Page 23: Subir Sachdev

Elementary excitations of paramagnet

For large J, there is a stable S=1, neutral, quasiparticle excitation: its two S=1/2

constituent spins are confined by a linear attractive potential

,S p

Page 24: Subir Sachdev

Elementary excitations of paramagnet

The gap to all excitations with non-zero S remains finite across this transition, but the gap to spin singlet excitations

vanishes. There is no local order parameter and the transition is described by a Z2 gauge theory

For smaller J, there can be a confinement-deconfinement transition at which the S=1/2 spinons are liberated: these are neutral, S=1/2 quasiparticles

N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1773 (1991). X.G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 2664 (1991).T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher Phys. Rev. B 62, 7850 (2000).

,S p

P.W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987).

Page 25: Subir Sachdev

Fractionalization in atomic gases

= Two F=1 atoms in a spin singlet pair

“Ordinary” spin-singlet insulator

Quasiparticle excitation

Quasiparticle carries both spin and “charge”

E. Demler and F. Zhou, cond-mat/0104409

Page 26: Subir Sachdev

Quasiparticle excitation in a fractionalized spin-singlet insulator

Quasiparticle carries “charge” but no spin

Spin-charge separation

Page 27: Subir Sachdev

Conclusions

I. Study of quantum phase transitions offers a controlled and systematic method of understanding many-body systems in a region of strong entanglement.

II. Atomic gases offer many exciting opportunities to study quantum phase transitions because of ease by which system parameters can be continuously tuned.

III. Promising outlook for studying quantum systems with “fractionalized” excitations (only observed so far in quantum Hall systems in condensed matter).