study on polyaniline-tin(ii) molybdophosphate ... · eds ›˙.= >˝ %˚˛ ](% ( >˝ %˚˛ = ›˙...
TRANSCRIPT
-
dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2018.99450.2498 61Original Paper
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
Jouranl of Water and Wastewater, Vol. 30, No.3, pp: 61-72
Study on Polyaniline-tin(II) Molybdophosphate Nanocomposite Efficiency on Removal of Reactive
Orange 122 Dye from Aqueous Solutions
M. Beheshtikya1, P. Gharbani2
1.MScStudent,DepartmentofChemistry,AharBranch,IslamicAzadUniversity,Ahar,Iran
2.Assoc.Prof.,DepartmentofChemistry,AharBranch,IslamicAzadUniversity,Ahar,Iran
(CorrespondingAuthor) [email protected]
(Received Sep. 26, 2017 Accepted May 29, 2018)
To cite this article : Beheshtikya, M., Gharbani, P., 2019, “Study on polyaniline-tin(II) molybdophosphate nanocomposite efficiency on removal of reactive orange 122 dye from aqueous solutions.” Journal of Water and Wastewater, 30(3), 61-72.
Doi: 10.22093/wwj.2018.99450.2498. (In Persian)
Abstract In the last few years, color removal from textile industries has been given much attention because of its potential toxicity and visibility problem. There have been various promising techniques for the removal of dyes. Adsorption is one of the most popular, effective and economic methods. Nanocomposite of polyaniline-molybdophosphatetin (II) was synthesized by polyaniline and molybdophosphatetin (II) via simple and easy method and was characterize by FTIR, XRD, FESEM, TEM, BET and EDS. Then, the efficiency of synthesized nanocomposite was investigated on the removal of Reactive Orange 122 dye. FESEM and XRD data reveled that the size of nanocomposite was 80 nm and its structure was amorphose. As results, dye adsorption onto nanocomposite was reached to equilibrium at 40 min. Also, its removal increased by increasing of nanocomposite dosage and decreasing of pH and dye concentration. Isotherm adsorption studied cionfirmed the Reactive Orange 122 dye adsorption onto polyaniline-molybdophosphatetin (II) was obeyed Langmuier isotherm and the maximum adsorption capacity for removal of Reactive Orange 122 dye by polyaniline-molybdophosphatetin (II) was obtained about 47.42 mg/g. The maximum removal of Reactive Orange 122 dye (87.56%) by polyaniline-molybdophosphatetin (II) was obtained at pH =2, 0.1 g/250ml of nanocomposite, and 50 mg/L of dye concentration.
Keywords: Nanocomposite, Langmuier, Tin, Reactive Orange 122.
-
dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 62
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
������� ������� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
مقاله پژوهشي
و فاضالب، دوره 61-72، صفحه:3، شماره30مجله آب
�*�L �5*�(��!� ��/0Q��L0E�E �) .!7 ��4>�+% )0� 8 ! E-II(�TDE* HMB *�;�UE*�E 0 �L�*VWW X0!"� /� �(- ,�
�,$ "AJ>6 R9(�*"D�6(p K9�(I �.
=>,�#�% [�@ 5�B��� ,� �*��? +��' 5��A ,�'�� +)��'��? ����� ,�� �K�� ���#� ,�� ,+�9)� �8 5�/���
C>,�� �K�� ,�#�% [�@ 5�B��� ,� �*��? +��' 5��A ,������ ���#� ,�� ,+�9)� �8 5�/���
�)#5��E (4GE�[email protected]
������)�/�/������/�/�(
*02 #( #)��� 8�� #( 9�:*� ;��(:+ ����4( 6�+7� ��/ ��1C5% �*�� .>��P*%D ��.b���� �"�(*V ��(%+��F G+.�c�*V �P*P �) 4�S ^*0A-')��&�� O���P3II(��HP( MW� (��8P(*P ��1V�(�JJ [���� .� �%3 *� "
�267*- ' 23 �8��9)��(KJ=- D s�� �����(�O��- ��V�Q ����
-
���? +)��*#+�% ;#
a��? ��� +X����8... dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 63
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
������ )Saadatjou et al., 2009 ����%B�( .(�)-��< () -�}$����$���( ���'() �����2����1��M����7 ()���I� �(1��� &������)
(Karadag et al., 2007) ����%B�( )�7- .��2���(�)�>- �D �������4 () -�6��� .�� � >-;5 ��8?���� ��(��� �� ��������)6
�� 2)1>- D .���) &������-(� M��,� () -�1��%\� �� � () �� ��1�2������� 6���4 () (�v< �� - >)�� E-�V�1�� () T�89� Mn
�(2�@O !7�� - >)�) ���� �1 ����� =��������������������� (Daneshvar et al., 2006)6&12) .1� ��8�� �321-��< ���4 ��
���� ����� �� ���%B�( .�D�� () T;�,� !7���%���E��� - M�� ���� M���)�� )Yazdanbakhsh et al., 2015.( �%B�(¤���(1\�(��� ��wzz &���)w��( :�� ( ���1������
��11��� T���� O�C31H20ClN7O16S5.4Na =��� () (���O- ���� ������'�7���� ��� ��� �B�(��� >)�o������� - )��� )��7- &�12)
M�Q - �� ?, M� (��,� () M- �1� �=�� .(Saeed et al., 2015).
N-( � M���������� �������������o8����� M������_�1�3�����7� )Saeed et al., 2015, Rasoulifard et al., 2010 6(
O� �2�1� �81) M�Puasa et al., 2012 ���� 6(1M�.(Mário et al., 2009) M�1���1�x� ��O ��I14(Riera-Torres and Gutiérrez, 2010) 9?�� �3��7 -�)Gharehkhani, 2016� ��� (�03��<�%B�(����(1\�(�� ��wzz � � .=� >�� >)�o���� .1� O 6M�����
9? �37���2)1� &D)�� �7�� )(�� M)�� M�(� -1 �I (� �" �.1�_� .=� ��O D � =�4 �1>����1���4� �`)(Saeed et al.,
2015)� 61��M� )Rasoulifard et al., 2010(:�� ¥(�" ()�4 -) %�Ilhan et al., 2008�� ( � �� �~�7 M���5�03�< .��� �%�B�(
.=� >�� >)�o��
Fig. 1. Structure of Reactive Orange 122 dye 48��/�\�(�� �1���( �%B�( (��,� `gg
1 Trapa bispinosa’s
,������1a� ��������=������ ����¦2¦��@�6�!8F �� �!�����1x ���184���¦5��+� ��G�(~¦��@� -���������O�Z �M)����G�(~
�;'��>������ ��184 ���� &��12) �,*��1����� ����)����O��6�� �~�7 M���5 ���9?���()���7 "(���O D ���� .(Khan and
Shaheen 2013).��������=� ���� ��,� ��>�����G�(~ ¦��@� - �184���
�¦26¤������7 ����V�Q ���)������ �� �85)����)�����O�� ��()������V� ��G�(~ ��1�-��,)�I�M¦�)��� ..(Sharma et al, 2014).
�.���� � 6-(;'¦9? ����G�(~ ¦��@�6��&��12) ������¦�,
(�1����� �,�-e? �I� �;'��>.1���� ����G�(~ -���� � 1846�7�� �)�� �(���,)!87 �>)�=.84���181.��� &�12) %�� 6M�� �4��(���9�1�?�-��(�
-
+2��* �#�� +��*�S X#��% � ��L dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 64
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
� =� � �)���7�(�I� ���� 6> �� �1E� �4 G�o2�� �=� �� �2(��e(�I� ���1 8� 6����8" )II(� 61� o�O�� 6:1��1 ���:� -�L2��1G��� � =� � �� , M�2��(���.����
././Y9?#w��$ #D�D %A2�"I x\ :�@=��0&,�#� K,,D�(II)
� ����1����� �����=84���1812�� .1�8" G�o�O-��(II)6(��V� -����� 8����8" )II(z/$(J��6�1� o�O�:w/$(J��� -��L2��1G��� w/$(J����1�>�� ��� -&�,�) ��: �I� w$$$
¦ ¦-( ���=��) (� " M%�6�� .�� �O�Z� >)-%O� M��� ��1� o�O�:�� 8����8" )II(6�( T��89� o�1�-��� �O��Z� M��� ��L2��1G��� �( T�89� 21���(�� .��T84���1�81.��1>�� �(Gharbani, 2017) ��(� �����T�89� �O�Z� ����( .�� �1!()�:�C92 �� ��-�@� ��� ��I���� &�����.� � �1!
� �����:=5� -(�M%� -�@� ��G�� z|=5� ()��)�q���� -��=2�< .�� (� " �@� .=O D ��:����� -( T�89� ��� "�1j
�,�� 0�' ��-�@� ���U�.(�� ��I��� ��� ��6 �?V� ()M-� () ��)�}$s�1�8 �7():I, ��.)��� :I, >�� ��� M-���
) , >�� -���1��1 ���:w/$(J��� ��� G��� z|=5�� -(��1 ���=5 rpm w}$()s��� (� �" >)�) .��� T��89� a�)��\�
0�' >�� -��������pH �� O��'���,�)��� �?V� �� ��� �I��� >)�) ��-()M-� ()��)�}$s�1�8 �7():I, ��.
./B/"5W� �rQ ������� ����� �3��7 9?������(��1\�(���� ��wzz -( ����������
������� >�� %�� =N-( ���14�� E��\�� ���.G� �11X� =�C8F ���(1\�(�� ��wzz ()T�Q M�� =���� ��� ���� ���(�4 j�8��� 1C� (��V� 6�~�7 =C8F (���1\�(�� ��wzz6pHT�89� M��� -
)(��� s��� ����(��(� �" =�O D .(���V� ������ �� ()z}$ 81����( T�89� � �12���( �1 \�(��� ��wzz ��� .�2(� ()� }$$ 81���@� .�� ����( �12 ����� (���V� M)��� �O�Z� ���~��7 �6
- �� >) L� T�89� ���� A�I� M�� G�� � �@� (�) ���E��\��� ��� .=��O D���C��1LpH � T���89�NaOH -HCl .���� >)�o����
1 Dae Jung 2 Scharlau 3 Merck
������ �3��7 >�B���) � >)�o���� ���� M) ��� 0���' � ���@� ���� ����O����UV-Vis .�� =�H � ���%�B�( ��'() .11@����( �1 �
\�(���wzz >�� 03< ��2)�@� w�� >)�o��
)w(100A
)AA((%)movalRe0
t0 *−
=
�2)�@� .�� () �x A0-A t�� () �3�7 - �12-� �37 !1� � M���t.=�� .1��_�
(��V� �%B�(���(1\�(�� ��wzz �37 >�� �� �-( e?� �~��7 mg/g)) T)�@� M�� () (qe� ( �2)�@�z�� ���9�
)z(Vm
)CC(q e0e *−
=
�� .�� ()�2)�@� Ce6C0�� � �1!=�C8F ��12-� -=�C8F 2)��@��T��89� !��< �
¦81� E D �12 ()��.����� VT�89� L\< ��12 !��< � -mM-�~�7 E D !�< �.=�
e/�/�/G(3�%9� "5W� �rQ '�! ��E �-% ����37�( GJ)�@��Z��� �� ��� ������@�1�1 (���V� .
-( � >�� �37 >)�����) () �~�7 e?��41�� .�� (���.���-( T-����� ���� .�E ��-% ����� >)�o��� )(�����E ��-% ����B�J��1 6 2��- O1�� -1� .��� ���� GJ)�@� �� ����� � �1 () !�>)(-�
=� >��
){(m L eeL e
q K Cq =
1+K C
)|(1n
e F eq = K C
)}(e T eq =B ln(K C )
GJ)�@� .�� () �� qeT)���@� T���< () �~���7 E ��7 ���)�� �3�7 >��� ��� ��
-
���? +)��*#+�% ;#
a��? ��� +X����8... dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 65
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
�~�7 � ¦�81� !�< .=�� E �D �� E �D KL�3�7 T)��@� =���H �� �12 !�< � 1B�J �9? ¦�81� 6E �D KF-1/n =���H ����
.������� 12����- O E ���-%��KF�9?�� �3��7 =��1O ^ !���< � (mg/g) (L/mg)1/2 -n9?� �3�7 �� &������ M��I� �(�.���)
B1=RT/b ���H��� D �� �� =��9?� �3�7�B�����- )(�) KT4 =��H12)�@� ����-�� =��H ���� E �-%1. �� ��12 !��< ��E D =� .(Gulnaz et al., 2006)
./E/%,��D�
��� ����2�1���� %� �� �����O- ��� UV-Vis T���DR5000- 15V =� � ��` �����6j1Q >�B�) N� �4 � � �@������
)XRD T��� (Panalytical x pert pro 6>�B��)FESEM T���FESEM: Zeiss Model Sigma VP � �� -�EDS �E �� (�%�O�
Dxford instruments � ��� .���� >)�o�����2�����1%BET T���� �Quanta Chrome � � -�2���1%TEM >�B�) � FEI Tecnai™
Transmission Electron Microscopes .�� >)�o��
�/T56 � U9�AD �/�/0� %A2� Y9?#w��$ #D�D "9���2�
Q1jFTIR 84���1812�� .1��8" G�o�O-��(II) &��� ()zM��I�Q .=� >�� >)�)1�� >���I� .�4 j1�cm-1 {|$$ b�� �
>- �D M(��V���� - M(�V�� �I� �� ����OHQ -�1
-
+2��* �#�� +��*�S X#��% � ��L dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 66
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
>�� �x �w$$ � �� =� ������ �1�R���������� %��� �� ��=84���1812�� .1�8" G�o�O-��(II) � �� .=���( ���1����� ��I
���� �� Q ��C� )(��� =�1jEDS &���� () M�|>���� >)�) M��I� ��� >�����I� ���� (�?����� .=��������Q i����?� )��1 jEDS ������
������ 6.� � '��5 &��� >�� %�� =12�� 6M- ��1��8" - M���+2�,�� - =��)� B�) M� ()�� >��� �� )��1�R�� �� *��8,
84���1812�� .1�8" G�o�O-��(II) =� >�� %��.
&��}-�+���������� �](%� () �( >�� %�� =���������� M��I� j8�������) ���� ����� &��� i���?� . �� �84 =���1�81.
2��1�8" G�o�O-��(II) a;��� &�8���=� O ^ �3�2 -�1 =��)���� ����, �~�7 M���5=��)� � .�>���� D1 �")1e?� =)�o���%��� �~�7 e? =��|/wE D � �� � ������� =).
Fig. 4. FESEM & EDS of polyaniline-tin(II)molybdophosphate 48�E/ ��+� FESEM -EDS �8" G�o�O-��12�� .181�� �84(II)
Fig. 5. TEM Images of polyaniline-tin(II)molybdophosphate 48�S/ �-�+�TEM �8" G�o�O-��12�� .181�� �84(II)
-
���? +)��*#+�% ;#
a��? ��� +X����8... dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 67
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
B/./19��?� D� "5W� �rQ '�!�� �%M "�D�� D # ,A$�ee
'�� (6"I x\ :�@=� � 0&,�#� K,,D�(II) �� �� ���@2�?� H� -s���� M���� G��� )�~��7 ()M�%��1� �3��7 9?�%�B�(���(���1\�(��� ��`gg6������ ���()��4 (���V�
���� � j��8������>���� %���� =)$z/$6$|/$6$/$6$/$6w/$(E D -z}$ 81��� �12 T�89��(��1\�(�� ��`gg ���8F ��=C
}$ ¦81� �12 () E D M�� G�� () -wz$ .�� E�\�� �V1") ��7�� ��&�� �����~�7 ) M�%1� ���%O� �� �� =O D �\1�� M���6�37 9?�����%���B�(¤�(�����1\�(����� ��`gg -( ��������84���1���81.
2��1���8" G�o���O-��(II) ��� ���%��O���(���%��O� .���� &��12) .����������U M��1� .1� �~��7 G�(~ M�%�1� ���%O� �� �� ) � M�g/��`/E D ()g�81� 6 �12 )���@� >��B��7 ���� �� )��7�� T��@O-(����O�� ���%�O� s�� e? �\1�� () - G�(~���� (Auta and
Hameed, 2011) 9?�� �3��7 ���'() -��%��B�(��� J�����)-( .9? �37 �@2�?���%B�(��(��1\�(��� ��`gg -( ����~��7
�84 =���1 ����1����M� ���1���U %1�� .1���\ ��)�) M���I� �(=��� >)Rasoulifard et al., 2010.( O Q ��) �� ()�3�7 M�%�1� ���
@� ��( ������=���) -���� � ���� G��C92 () ��"�- () .>�B��7 )��@� �12-� ���)��� (�1�� G�(~���� s �) () =�� ���� 6
�� - �(�� �M��� 6M�� =�3D ����9?� �3�7�- >��� p����� � ���� �37 =5 �����)Mehrizad and Gharbani, 2016.(
Fig. 6. The effect of dosage & contact time [RO 122 ]0=50 mg/L; pH=5.9; T= 25±20C
48�Z�~�7 ) H� -s�� M�� G��
T= 25±20C6pH=5.9 -[RO 122 ]0=50 mg/L
��� �7�� �&�� 6�%B�( �9? �37¤�\�(��� ��1���(wzz ��84 �-( � ) ��8" G�o��O-��12�� .1�81��II � ��@� (|$��� ��V1")
T)�@��1(M�� �32 . |$�� �V1") M���5M�� ���O D �C� () T)�@� .�� %1� M�(��� - ) O ¦2�( >) �� N(�%D ��� ���� �3�7 =5 �9?��%B�(��(��1\�(�� ��`gg -( �� �~�7�84 =�1 ��
�1��M� 2-� G�C92 ()1() - >)�� J�� �g")1=���� �V ��� =�2�< T)���@����� ���()Rasoulifard et al., 20109?�� �3��7 .(��%���B�( ¤�(�����1\�(����� ��`gg -( ������ =����4���1 >�Trapa
bispinosa’s �12-� G��C92 () %�1 � ��� ��@� - �`g ")1��� ��V T)�@� =2���� %��� = ��.)) D (�� o' �?V�84���1812�� .1�8" G�o�O-��(II) )-��< ()/|������ )Gharbani, 2017�?V� (�� o' �?V� .( ����� =��
��(���9?�-( �?V� .�� ()�.=�� o�' �C� )(�� >)�� e?�@��9? (�� 6�?V� .�� � &�"�-(�- =��� �C� )(��� !1� ��@� o�� M� ��=�) .� .1�U �"�- (��� ) � M�1� M���84���1�81.2��1�����8" G�o�����O-�� (II) ()pH ������ �/|6(������ M-������ ()/|pH< 9?�� (���� ��(�)�() - =����/|>pH�(�)�(����
9?�o����%O� &12) .=���37 ��%�B�( -( ����84���1�81.2��1�8" G�o�O-��(II) ()pH����1����� =�� .��� �%�B�(¤���(1\�(�� ��`gg ��( :� ���1���(��� �� () .�� ����� 6=��o���)(�)�" :1����- ��2� ��~�7 .��� ��( .1�� �1����~��7 -�(�)�() =�� (��pH����1���37 M�%1� ���%O� &12)�%B�( =�.
O Q ��()pH���6 �J��84���1812�� .1��8" G�o�O-��(II) o�� (���� )�, ��� 1D��) )�� - ((�� o' �?V� =85 �� �@O�) =851.
�(�) >���� �37 - �~�7�o�� (������� 03< �'() 6��� �����)Saeed et al., 201503��< .( �%��B�(¤���( �1\�(���� ��`gg ����7�" �~��� :� ¥(��� >�� :I, %1�I� �� .�1< M�%�() �( 03
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rem
oval
(%)
Time (min)
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1g/250ml
-
+2��* �#�� +��*�S X#��% � ��L dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 68
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
Fig. 7. The effect of pH [PAMPT ]0 =0. 1g/250mL, pH=5.9, T=25±2 0C
48�[ H� pH T=25±2 0C6pH=5.9 -[PAMPT ]0 =0. 1g/250mL
pH���¤�1� )�) M�I�=� >�� �� 2)1����- ��2� ��~�7 &1� :1.���o�� (����� ����� �%���B�( - =����� (����� ����� �~����7�)�����=���� >
.(Ilhan et al., 2008) H� �@2�?�pH 03< () �%B�(¤���(1\�(�� ��`gg � O �������
���1��14 M�1��O IUV/H2O2� ���< �� )�) M�I� �1 03�< M�%9� ()1f�����,��� c(����) .(Naderi et al., 2016).��'()
���-( T�@O�PAMPT )�) =��� .(Gulnaz et al., 2006).2�(�� M�(��� - ) O1I� %) � >���>��%O� �� �� ���=�C8F �
2-���1-( ��� M� �3��7 ���'() 6�%��B�( ���1����������� M���� ������ )Rasoulifard et al., 2010.(
Fig. 8. The effect of Reactive Orange 122 dyes concentration
[PAMPT ]0 =0. 1g/250mL, pH=5.9, T=25±2 0C48�t/�%B�( �12-� =C8F 1HR�1���( �\�(�� �wzz
T=25±2 0C6pH=5.9 -[PAMPT ]0 =0. 1g/250mL B/S/G(3�%9� "5W� �rQ '�! �� ( � (�C�����E �-% ���9? �37�B�(%�¤���( �1 \�(��� ��
wzz -( ��84���1812�� .1��8" G�o��O-��(II) T��89� 6��������2-� =C8F �1 � j�8��� ����( �1 \�(��� ��wzz ()pH =���H/}-
�V����H A�I� (����� 6�~��7 �1 2)��@� ��C92 () - ��|$")1��V(��V� .�� =�H �37
����������(�)�� �F��1��?, �9?�� �3��7��%��B�(¤���(��1 �\�(���wzz -(�84���1812�� .1��8" G�o��O-��(II) &��� ()
.=� >�� >)�) M�I� T-�7 ()`��1� �Z %�=���H !�B���� -����E �-% ���B�J1- O 6 2���1�� - 1>�� >)(-� ..=�� i���?�
&����T-���7 -w���� 6 ��Z =��85�B������ !�J�������E ���-%
B�J1) y/=R29?� �37 6(�-( �� �%�B�(��84���1�81.2��1���8" G�o���O-��(II) � ��B�J E ���-%��1@�� ��1��� =�- �����
� ��������7 ) �85 .�� M��J:�� G(��' �� T��� () .=�� �
B�J1� � u O ��� =� .�J:��� �T���2�� ����&�< >)��� >��¦� �~�7 �37 () - )�� ���� ��� (���V� �~��7 �?���37�4 - M���1������=ID � �37 34� ���(��4 .=�qm ()
��B�J E �-%1O ^ ����< >���) M�I� �1=� �� �~��7��3�79?��%B�(¤�(��1\�(�� ��`gg =� )�, e? () � () ��� �� .
��-n4 T-�7 i��?�`�� �� �yg/y�18��� E �D � E D�=�)9? �37 .�����%B�(¤�(��1\�(�� ��`gg -( ��� =�41>�
87.56
71.65
61.5652.45
46.89
0
20
40
60
80
100
2 4 6 8 10
Rem
oval
(%)
pH
0
20
40
60
80
100
10 20 30 40 50
Rem
oval
(%)
RO122 Concentration (mg/L)
-
���? +)��*#+�% ;#
a��? ��� +X����8... dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 69
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
Fig. 9. Langmuier, Frundlich and Temkin isotherms for RO122 dye adsorption onto PMTMP
48�u/�37 .1��- 12��- O 6 1B�J E �-%�� �%B�( �9? �1���(
�\�(��wzz �-( �PAMPT
���1�1� �4� � �1%� ��B�J E �-%1 ¦�� =�1@�� ����(Saeed et al., 2015) .
� �����V��O ^ ������1�~���7 �3��7 =������3��7 () j��8���9?��%B�(¤���(1\�(��� ��`gg �~��7 6����- >)�o��� )(���O ^1T-�7 () ���� �37 =g� >�� �';, .=�V� ���O ^ ��1=
� () �37�B�J E �-% �1 �� >����I� ���� )��� %�� :�� ¥(��"6>�� :I, � - ����) 6=��4 �1 >� ����1�1� ��4� � O ^ �1 �3�7 =
J�����3�7 () �%�B�(¤���( �1 \�(��� ��`gg �V� () .���(�)���� 84�-��1&�2� &n2��- G�� �84���1�812�� .1��8" G�o��O-��(II) 6
O ^184 �37 =���1�812�� .1��8" G�o��O-��(II) �1 ��I =�� -����������� ���5�7 M����~� ���� ���8��" ��19?� �3�7 () J��� =�
�%B�(����(1\�(�� ��`gg ��.)-( (��
��0Q*=��H E �-%�� ��� �9? �37 .1��- 12��- O 6 1B�J ��� �%B�( �\�(�� �1���(`gg �PAMPT Table 1. Isotherms constants of Langmuier, Frundlich and Temkin for adsorption of Reactive Orange 122 onto
PAMPT
Temkin Isotherm Freundlich IsothermLangmuier IsothermR2KTBR2nKfR2KLqm
0.9721.229.230.9010.10980.540.9840.5247.42
��0Qe/�@� E �-%�� ��� ���(�4 �\�(�� �1���( �%B�( �9? �37 �� � �2)`gg �~�7 �-( � j8��� ��� Table 2. Equlibrium isotherm parameters for adsorption of Reactive Orange 122 onto different adsorbents
Adsorbent Langmuier Isotherm Frundlich Isotherm Temkin Isotherm
KL (L mg/L) R
2 qm (mg g/L)
KF(mg g/L)
(L mg/L)1/2R2 n
KTLg/L)( R
2 B(Kj mol-1)
Polyvinyl alcohol-alginate 0.0091 0.917 40 0.0789 0.98 3.38 0.00744 0.828 475.36
(Saeed et al., 2015)
Trapa bispinosa Fruit 0.0143 0.881 76.92 3.141 0.903 4.25 4*10-7 0.889 215.44 (Saeed et al., 2015)
Trapa bispinosa seed 0.0151 0.926 66.66 2.618 0.897 5.6 6*10-7 0.915 233.73 (Saeed et al., 2015)
Trapa bispinosa Fruit 0.072 0.962 111.11 11.272 0.231 3.42 0.033341 0.917 176.21 (Saeed et al., 2015)
Trapa Fruit bispinosa/H2O2 0.0189 0.939 100 3.758 0.803 6.95 5*10
-7 0.94 172.65 (Saeed et al., 2015)
peel bispinosa Trapa /H2O2 0.075 0.977 111.11 13.58 0.75 10.99 1*10
-7 0.91 186.42 (Saeed et al., 2015)
Dried green mushrooms 0.0197 0.94 180.7 22.7 0.97 2.799 (Ilhan et al., 2008)
polyaniline-molybdophosphatetin(II) 0.984 0.52 47.42 80.54 0.901 0.109 1.22 0.972 9.23
This research
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 2 4 6
qe(m
g/g)
Ce (mg/L)
Exp. Langmuier
-
+2��* �#�� +��*�S X#��% � ��L dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 70
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
E/�,AD '(,L () ��.��-n4 ���� �����84 =���181.2��1-�� ��8" G�o��O )II(�� �� %�� �O ' �� M- V� - >)� N-(.( ��Q1j����FTIR 6
XRD %��� ����� ���� ��� �( =R�1� 2���� - ) �� �1%XRD )��7- ���(��,����� 0(��� 2��� -1%FTIR �1�I� %1���� &���� ��=-
>- D ��� 58���M��I� �( M� () )��7�� )�) ���� .�EDX )�) M��I� ��� ����� ������� A2��, >���� %��� ==��� �(�) -�6.� ��� 6��8"2��1M�� -�1M- � ��� � .�����( ��� G�(~ >�����>���� =) -�2�O(���e?���� �����=2��1-�� ) ��8" G�o��OII M� � (
-�+�� FESEM ��� �� �� ��O D�)�) M�I� f��� G�(~ >�����)-�< ()����.=� �� M��y�� �V1") M����5 M��� () T)��@�
�������� -( �� �%�B�( �37�M������( - =�� �~��7 e?�9? �37�()pH����1���12-� =�C8F ��@2�?� .=� �I �1 �
�%�O� ��� )�) M�I� �%B�(����� ����� (���V� ���8F - =�C2-� =�1��%B�(6��� 03�< M�%�1� � � �1 �%�O� !�������� -����3�7 .����9?��%�B�(¤���( �1 \�(��� ��wzz -( �������� ���� �� =���
��B�J E �-%1 =V��?� .=��)
References Agarwal, S., Tyagi, I., Gupta, V.K., Golbaz, F., Golikand, A.N. & Moradi O. 2018. Synthesis and characteristics
of polyaniline/zirconium oxide conductive nanocomposite for dye adsorption application. Journal of
Molecular Liquids, 2016, 494-498.
Ali, S.R., Ma, Y., Parajuli, R.R., Balogun, Y., Lai, W.Y.C. & He, H.A. 2007. A nonoxidative sensor based on a
self-doped polyaniline/carbon nanotube composite for sensitive and selective detection of the
neurotransmitter dopamine. Analytical Chemistry, 79, 2583-2587.
Auta, M. & Hameed, B. H. 2011. Optimized waste tea activated carbon for adsorption of Methylene Blue and
Acid Blue 29 dyes using response surface methodology. Journal of Chemical Engineering, 175, 233-243.
Barbero, C., Miras, M. C., Schnyder, B., Haas, O. & KÖtz, R. 1994. Sulfonated polyaniline films as cation
insertion electrodes for battery applications. Part 1. Structural and electrochemical characterization, Journal
of Materials Chemistry, 4, 1775-1783.
Daneshvar, N., Oladegaragoze, A. & Djafarzadeh, N. 2006. Decolorization of basic dye solutions by
electrocoagulation: An investigation of the effect of operational parameters. Journal of Hazardous Materials
B, 129, 116-122.
Gharbani, P. 2017. Synthesis of polyaniline-tin(II)molybdophosphate nanocomposite and application of it in the
removal of dyes from aqueous solutions. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 242, 229-234. Gharehkhani, E. 2016. Investigation and optimization of reactive orange-3R dye surface absorption by nano-
MMT/NZVI composite absorbent in a process of textile industry wastewater treatment. Bulgarian Chemical
Communications, 48, 211-218.
Ghorban, F., Molavi, H., Fathi, S. & Piri, F. 2017. Application of response surface methodology to optimize
malachite green removal by Cl-nZVI nanocomposites. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 28(4), 79-92.
(In Persian)
Grgur, B.N., Gvozdenovic, M.M., Miskovic-Stankovic, V.B. & Popovic, Z.K. 2006. Corrosion behavior and
thermal stability of electrodeposited PANI/epoxy coating system on mild steel in sodium chloride solution.
Progress in Organic Coatings, 56, 214-219.
-
��? +)��*#+�% ;#
a��? ��� +X����8... dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 71
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ���������� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
Gulnaz, O., Kaya, A. & Dincer S. 2006. The reuse of dried activated sludge for adsorption of reactive dye.
Journal of Hazardous Materials, 134, 190-196.
Ilhan, S., Iscen, C.F., Caner, N. & Kiran I. 2008. Biosorption potential of dried penicillium restrictum for
Reactive Orange 122: Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Journal of Chemical Technology and
Biotechnology, 83, 569-575.
Karadag, D., Akgul, E., Tok, S., Erturk, F., Kaya, M.A. & Turan, M. 2007. Basic and reactive dye removal using
natural and modified zeolites. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 52, 2436-2441.
Khan, A.A. & Shaheen, S. 2013. Ion-exchange studies of ‘organic–inorganic’ nano-composite cation-exchanger:
Poly-o-anisidine Sn tungstate and its analytical application for the separations of toxic metals. Composites
Part B: Engineering, 44, 692-697.
Mário, H.P., Santana, L.M., Silva, D., Freitas A.C., Boodts, J.F.C. & Faria, L.A.D. 2009. Application of
electrochemically generated ozone to the discoloration and degradation of solutions containing the dye
Reactive Orange 122. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164, 10-17.
Mehrizad, A. & Gharbani P. 2016. Application of central composite design and artificial neural network in modeling of
reactive blue 21 dye removal by photo-ozonation process. Water Science and Technology, 74, 184-193.
Meroufel, A., Deslouis, C. & Touzain, S. 2008. Electrochemical and anticorrosion performances of zinc-rich and
polyaniline powder coatings. Electrochimica Acta, 53, 2331-2338.
Naderi, T., Ehrampoush, M.H. & Malakootian, M. 2016. Efficiency of electrocoagulation process coupled with
UV/H2O2 to remove the Orange Reactive dye 122 from wastewater of textile industries. Koomesh, 18, 408-
415. (In Persian)
Noroozi, B., Sorial, G.A., Bahrami, H. & Arami, M. 2007. Equilibriums and kinetic adsorption study of cationic
dye by a natural adsorbent - silkworm pupa. Journal of Hazardouse Mateials, 139, 167-174.
Puasa, S.W., Ruzitah, M.S. & Sharifah A.S.A.K. 2012. Competitive removal of reactive black 5/reactive orange
16 from aqueous solution via micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. International Journal of Chemical
Engineering and Applications, 3, 354-358.
Rasoulifard, M.H., Taheri Qazvini, N., Farhangnia, E., Heidari, A. & Doust Mohamadi, S.M.M. 2010. Removal
of direct yellow 9 and reactive orange 122 from contaminated water using chitosan as a polymeric
bioadsorbent by adsorption process. Journal of Color Science and Technology, 4, 17-23.
Riera-Torres, M. & Gutiérrez, M.C. 2010. Colour removal of three reactive dyes by UV light exposure after
electrochemical treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal,156, 114-120.
Saadatjou, N., Rasoulifard, M.H. & Heidari, A. 2009. Removal of basic red 46 using low-cost adsorbent of
hardened paste of Portland cement from contaminated water. Journal of Color Science Technology, 2, 221-
226.
Saeed, M., Nadeem, R. & Yousaf, M. 2015. Removal of industrial pollutant (Reactive Orange 122 dye) using environment-friendly sorbent Trapa bispinosa’s peel and fruit. International Journal of Environmental
Science and Technology, 12, 1223-1234.
Sathiyanarayanan, S., Muthkrishnan, S. & Venkatachari, G. 2006. Corrosion protection of steel by polyaniline
blended coating. Electrochimica Acta, 51, 6313-6319.
-
+2��* �#�� ��% � ��L +��*�S X# dx.doi.org/10.22093/wwj. 2018.99450.2498 72
����� � �� �� Journal of Water and Wastewater
��������� ����� ����� Vol. 30, No. 3, 2019
Seid-Mohammadi, A., Asgari, Gh. Mehralipour, J., Shabanlo, A., Almasi, H. & Zaheri, F. 2016. Sonochemical
oxidation of acid blue 113 by Fe (II)-activated hydrogen peroxide and persulfate in aqueous environments.
Journal of Water and Wastewater, 27 (2), 2-13. (In Persian)
Semagne, B., Diaz, I., Kebede T. & Taddesse A.M. 2016. Synthesis, characterization and analytical application
of polyaniline tin molybdophosphate composite with nanocrystalline domains. Reactive and Functional
Polymers, 98, 17-23.
Sharma, G., Pathania, D., Naushad, M. & Kothiyal, N.C. 2014. Fabrication, characterization and antimicrobial
activity of polyaniline Th tungstomolybdophosphate material: Efficient removal of toxic metal ions from
water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 251, 413-421.
Slade, R.C.T., Knowels, J.A., Jones D.J. & Roziere, J. 1997. The isomorphous acid salts α-Zr(HPO4)2·H2O, α-
Ti(HPO4)2·H2O and α-Zr(HAsO4)2·H2O comparative thermochemistry and vibrational spectroscopy. Solid
State Ionics, 96, 9-19. Thakkar R. & Chudasama U. 2009. Synthesis and characterization of zirconium titanium phosphate and its
application in separation of metal ions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172, 129-137.
Yagan, A., Pekmez, N.O. & Yıldız, A. 2007. Inhibition of corrosion of. mild steel by homopolymer and bilayer
coatings of polyaniline and. polypyrrole. Progress in Organic Coatings, 59, 297-303.
Yazdanbakhsh, A.R., Kermani, M., Komasi, S., Aghayani, E. & Sheikhmohammadi, A. 2015. Humic acid
removal from aqueous solutions by peroxi-electrocoagulation process. Environmental Health Engineering
and Management Journal, 2, 53-58.