study of loop formation process on 1x1 v-bed rib knitting machine

7/28/2019 Study of Loop Formation Process on 1x1 v-bed Rib Knitting Machine

1/12

International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN 0976

6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IAEME

259

STUDY OF LOOP FORMATION PROCESS ON 1X1 V-BED RIB

KNITTING MACHINE: THE FACTORS AFFECTING LOOP LENGTH

AND VALIDATION OF MODEL

1SRINIVASULU K,

2MONICA SIKKA,

1J HAYAVADANA

1Department of Textile Technology,Osmania university, Hyderabad, India,500007.

2Department of Textile Technology, National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, India,

144011

ABSTRACT

A study of loop formation process on 1x1 V-bed flat knitting machine is initiated with

experiments designed by considering three knitting process variables: Yarn input tension,

Cam setting and Take down load. The interaction between these factors and their effect on

loop length and the percentage of contribution of variables on Final loop length is

determined. It was observed from the results that the contribution of cam setting on loop

length is more than the take down load which have a marginal effect only.

The proposed model is validated both experimentally and statistically. The unroved

loop length, the theoretical loop length were linearly related with an average of 5% error at

95% significance level.

Key words: Yarn input tension, cam setting, Takedown load, Unroved loop length,

Theoretical loop length.

1. INTRODUCTION

For the last twenty years by far the most important development in knitting

has been the extraordinary rise in popularity of double jersey cloth, particularly for ladies

outwear and even more recently in outer wear garments for men. For instance, the

amount of double jersey(Rib) fabric produced today is at least three times than that

of ten years ago.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN

ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET)ISSN 0976 - 6480 (Print)ISSN 0976 - 6499 (Online)Volume 4, Issue 2 March April 2013, pp. 259-270 IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijaret.aspJournal Impact Factor (2013): 5.8376 (Calculated by GISI)www.jifactor.com

IJARET

I A E M E


2/12



260

Properties of the knitted fabrics are mainly governed by two parameters (i.e. length of

loop and shape of the loop), the shape of the loop can be finalized during relaxation treatment

but the loop length is decided during formation process only. So it is important that the stitch

length of knitted fabric should be uniformly controlled to produce a superior fabric.

Loop length plays an important role in knitted fabric production in order to meet buyer

specifications and consumer satisfaction and the investigation of geometrical loop length or

theoretical loop length which makes the production of knitted fabric easy for knitter and it

consumes time to produce the fabric of different specifications. Ultimately the rate of

production will increase if we know the theoretical calculations of knitted fabric parameters.

The loop formation process became a subjective matter of research from past 50 years,

and some studies related to loop formation process are available in literature. The mechanism

of single jersey loop formation process as explained by Knapton and Munden (1966) was

based on the concept of robbing back (%). A mathematical model of the single jersey weft

knitted process involving flat bottom stitch cam was formulated by Alsaka. Peat and Spicer

developed a geometrical model of single jersey loop formation process. A mathematical

model of single jersey loop formation process involving non-linear stitch cam andincorporating five different stages of initial geometry of knitting zone was developed by Lau

and Knapton.

A model of single jersey loop formation process based on the concept of balancing forces

acting on needle that decides the loop forming point by Ghosh and Banerjee, and a model of

1x1 rib loop formation developed by Sadhan Chandra ray and Banerjee on dial and cylinder

machine.

In present work an attempt has made to study the impact knitting processing variables like

yarn Input tension, Cam Setting, and Take down Load on loop length and developed a

mathematical model of loop formation on 1x1 rib loop formation process on V-Bed flat

knitting machine.

The model is developed by considering two-dimensional coordinates of knitting elements byrotating both front bed and back bed to 45

0and considering the tuck point as an origin of

coordinate system. Based on 2D geometry a mathematical model has been developed for rib

loop length. The model is validated experimentally and statistically.

2. EXPERIMENTAL

2.1. Materials

The material selected for producing samples is three-ply Acrylic yarn of count 229TEX.

Experimental samples were produced on Hand driven V-bed machine by combinations of 3

processing variables (i.e. Yarn input tension, Cam setting, Take down load). For identifying

the role of one variable, and other variables kept as constant.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Measurement of Yarn input tension

To identify the effect of yarn input tension, 9 samples were produced by varying input

tension from 5g, 15g, and 25g by keeping cam setting and takedown load constant for a set.

The unroved loop length was subsequently measured for all samples. The Tensioner used for

varying yarn input tension is spring disc type and tension variation can be measured by

tension meter as shown in figure 1.


3/12

International Journal of Advanced

6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Onli

Figure 1. Position of tension m

2.2.2. Measurement of Cam setThere are 18 samples produced i

samples are produced by keepi

setting varying from 5mm-15

front bed cam setting, keeping

samples. The unroved loop l

samples.cam setting is change b

Figure 3

Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARE

ne) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IA

261

eter along yarn path Figure 2. Digital tensi

tingn order to identify the role of cam setting on lo

g yarn input tension, Take down load as con

m. Out of 18 samples 9 sample are produc

back bed setting constant and vice versa

ength can be measured simultaneously aft

rotating cam jack screw as in figure 3.

. Cam jack in V-bed knitting machine

), ISSN 0976

ME

ion meter

p length. The

tant and cam

d by varying

or remaining

r producing


4/12



262

C1*a C2*a

Stitch cam

Figure 4. Take down load set up

2.2.3. Measurement of Take down loadSample fabric were knitted over a range of 1500g, 2000g, 2500g of take down load

this is achieved by maintaining yarn input tension, cam setting as constant. There are 9

samples produced by hanging dead weights over width of 25 needles. The unroved loop

lengths are measured simultaneously after removal of weights. The take load is varied by

changing weights as shown figure 4.

3. MEASUREMENT OF STITCH CAM CHARACTERISTICS

The length of the yarn in the kitted loop is decided by stitch cam the characteristics as

shown in figure 5. Where a represents distance between neighboring Front bed and Back bed

needles, while , represents cam angles and C1 &C2 are some constants. The stitch camangles can be determined by observing movement of yarn up to knitting point.

Figure 5. Stitch cam characteristics of V-bed flat knitting machine


5/12



263

4. MEASUREMENT OF YARN NEEDLE DIMENSIONS

The dimensions of yarn and needles like diameter, movement of yarn path can be

measured by using image analyzer. For each sample, one hundred readings were taken for

working out the average value. The modulus of yarn is tested on Zwick tensile tester.The movement of yarn and configuration inside the knitting zone are taken as images by

digital camera and the dimensions of needle, wrap angles (L, T and L) around the front bed

and back bed needles, angle of path () of yarn between bed verges were measured.

4.1. Observation of yarn and needle movements under Quasi-static conditionBy moving the hand lever very slowly, one front bed needle (FN) is made to catch the

feed yarn. In that position, a mark was applied on the yarn lying across the preceding back bedneedle (BN) with indelible ink. The coordinates of marked point and of relevant FN and BN were

recorded. The machine was moved to short distance and the new positions of the marked point

and relevant needles were recorded. This procedure was continued till the FN under observationreached the running position after passing through the knitting points

5. DETERMINATION OF UNROVED LOOP LENGTH

The fabric was prepared in such a manner that the length of yarn forming completeknitted courses can be unroved. The lengths of yarn are measured in a straightened state under

suitable tension (B S: 5441). The straightened state is achieved by removing the knitting crimp

and/or yarn crimp as found in textured filament yarn.The stitch length can be calculate by counting the number of Wales available for fabric sample

and divide the course length by the number of needles used and express the results in cm.

6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

6.1 Effect of process variables on loop length6.1.1 Effect of yarn input tension on loop length

Loop lengths are calculated over a range of yarn input tension (from 5g to 25g) and camsetting (from 5mm to 15mm), and take down load kept constant. The values are plotted in graph

(figure 6). And the 3-Dimensional graphs were plotted with help of MATLAB software

Figure 6 Effect of yarn input tension on loop length


6/12



264

It is observed form the graph 6 that, at a constant value of take down load and cam

setting, an increase of yarn input tension level from 5g to 25 g always results in linearly

decrease in loop length. And the trend is same in all 3 level of cam setting (5mm, 10mm, and

15mm).For higher cam settings, the curves shifts upwards, the shape remains the same. In

general, the rate of increase in loop length with an increase in input tension decreases for

higher cam settings.

6.2. Effect of cam setting on loop length

6.2.1. Effect of front bed cam setting on Loop lengthThe samples were produced in order to see the effect of cam setting on Loop length.

Loop lengths were measured over a range of cam setting (from 5mm to 15mm) and the input

tension and take down load kept as constant. And the measured values were plotted in graph

(figure 7)

Figure 7. Effect of front bed cam setting on Loop length

It is observed from the graph 7 that at constant values of input tension, take down

load, an increase in the stitch cam setting results in linearly increase in loop length at 3 levels

of back bed cam setting (5mm, 10mm, and 15mm).

The trend of the graph is nearly same as the authors worked on single jersey(Banerjee P K,

and Ghosh S,1999) and 1x1 circular Bed knitting machine (Ray S C, 2003) but the slope of

curve is different because of linear cam profile of 1x1 V-bed flat rib knitting machine.

6.3. Effect of back bed setting on loop length

The samples were produced by varying back bed cam setting from 5mm to 15mmat three levels of front bed cam setting (at 5mm, 10mm, and 15mm), the variables input

tension, take down load kept constant. The measured values were plotted on

graph (figure 8).


7/12

International Journal of Advanced

6480(Print), ISSN 0976 6499(Onli

Figure 8

From the graph it sho

cam setting but the slope of the

is due to cam profile of V-bed m

6.4. Effect of Take down loadLoop lengths were calcul

cam setting levels at 5mm, 10m

There were 9 samples produced i

values of loop length are on grap

Figure 9

It is observed from the g

an increase in take down load.

down load on loop length (Baner

Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARE

ne) Volume 4, Issue 2, March April (2013), IA

265

ffect of back bed setting on loop length

s that the increase in loop length trend is sam

urve is exactly linear as compared to front bed

achine.

n Loop lengthated over range of take down load from 1500g t

, and 15mm, and yarn input tension kept as co

n order to see the effect take down load on loo

h (Figure 9).

ffect of Take down load on Loop length

raph that there is a nearly linear increase of loo

Compare to other variables there is marginal

jee P K, Ray S C, 2003) and (Banerjee P.K, Gh

), ISSN 0976

ME

as front bed

cam setting it

o 2500g and

stant value.

length. The

p length with

ffect of take

osh.S, 1999).


8/12



266

7. STATISTICAL INTERPRETATION OF EFFECT OF VARIABLES ON LOOP

LENGTH

To determine the impact of Input variables on output variable (Loop Length) the

complete data (Measured Loop length values) was analyzed by using STATISTICA

SOFTWARE. The result in terms of contribution of each variable on loop length is

determined. And the analytical data is explained by plotting graphs of input variables in terms

of chi- square value (Figure 10).

During loop formation process an interaction takes place between these three input

variables over loop length, and this interaction is explained in terms of regression equation.

The interaction result is show through regression equation in terms of F-value.

The equation as follows

1.719341 0.0785 0.626 0.0001 0.00147

Where

FCS- Front bed cam setting, BCS-Back bed cam setting, TL-Take down load, IT-

Input tension.

7.1 Impact of input variables over Loop length

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Importanceof variables (Loop lenghth (Chi-square))

TL

IT

FCS

BCS

Figure 10. Impact of input variables over Loop length


9/12



267

8. VALIDATION OF THE MODEL

8.1 Comparison of Unroved and Theoretical loop length (From Mathematical Model)

In order to validating the model the values of unroved loop length and theoretical

values should be compared. The computed or theoretical values were determined by

generating a JAVA programme (Sinivasulu K, 2013) and the actual values for calculation of

theoretical loop length are taken from machine (angles and distances) for every combination

of samples. The computed value s of 3 variables of samples is given in table

Table 1: Experimental and theoretical (from the model) values of output variables

S.No

Unroved Loop

length(Lu)(cms)

Theoretical Loop

length(Lt)(cms) % Error

1 2.40 2.45 -2.083

2 2.23 2.31 -3.587

3 2.10 2.16 -2.857

4 3.05 3.12 -2.295

5 2.84 2.91 -2.465

6 2.68 2.72 -1.493

7 3.65 3.70 -1.370

8 3.45 3.53 -2.319

9 3.35 3.42 -2.090

10 2.30 2.41 -4.783

11 2.60 2.65 -1.923

12 2.95 3.12 -5.763

13 2.56 2.65 -3.516

14 3.00 3.06 -2.000

15 3.40 3.45 -1.471

16 2.95 3.05 -3.39017 3.35 3.41 -1.791

18 3.72 3.84 -3.226

19 2.25 2.41 -7.111

20 2.75 2.81 -2.182

21 3.05 3.14 -2.951

22 2.60 2.68 -3.077

23 2.80 2.96 -5.714

24 3.35 3.42 -2.090

25 3.30 3.38 -2.424

26 3.86 3.89 -0.777

27 4.60 4.71 -2.391

28 1.95 2.05 -5.128

29 2.15 2.20 -2.32630 2.30 2.35 -2.174

31 2.60 2.61 -0.385

32 2.72 2.84 -4.412

33 2.83 2.89 -2.120

34 3.20 3.30 -3.125

35 3.42 3.52 -2.924

36 3.60 3.68 -2.222


10/12



268

Scatterplot with Histograms of theoritical loop length against unroved loop length

0

10

20

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5

unroved loop length

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

Theoriticalloopl

ength

0 10 20

Figure 11. A scatter plot between theoretical and unroved loop length

From the table and graph it is observed that there is an average of 5% error between

theoretical loop length and unroved loop length, and the linear relation is given by graph

0.0784 1.006

And it is concluded that both experimentally and statistically the proposed model (Srinivasulu

K, 2013) on 1x1 V-bed rib knitting machine is feasible.

9. CONCLUSIONS

Following are the conclusions drawn from the experimental work conducted.

An increase of yarn input tension results in linearly decreasing loop length. Forhigher cam settings, the curves shifts upwards, but the shape remains the same. In

general, the rate of increase in loop length with an increase in input tension decreases

for higher cam settings.

Back bed cam setting gives more loop length value as compared to front bed camsetting, and the variation is due to difference in profile of stitch cam for both the beds.

Effect of take down load on loop length is very marginal as compared to othervariables.

The results of the work suggest that suitable combinations of variables can be used(i.e the critical adjustment of the yarn input tension , stitch-cam setting and take download in conjunction with the properties of the yarn to be knitted.) to produce high

quality fabric and to meet the requirements or specifications of the buyer.

A two dimensional mathematical model is proposed to determine the loop length of v-bed rib knitted structure. This theoretical value can be used to produce a knitted fabric

of particular specifications. (G.S.M and Tightness factor).


11/12



269

10. REFERENCES

1. Banerjee, P.K., and Alaiban, T.S., Mechanism of Loop formation at Extreme cam settingon a sinker top machine: part II Analysis of limiting conditions, Textile research journal,

57, 568-574(1987).

2. Banerjee, P. k., and Alaiban, T.S., Mechanism of Loop formation at Extreme cam settingon a sinker top machine: part I Relation between count, gauge, and tightness factor,

Textile research journal, 57, 513-518(1987).

3. Banerjee, P. K., and Ghosh, S., A model of single-jersey Loop-formation process,Journal of textile institute, 90,187-208(1999).

4. Carmine Mazza, Paola Zonda, Knitting (A reference book of textile technology),ACIMIT, The Italian association of textile machinery producers, first edition 2001.

5. C. Prakash and C. V. Koushik., Effect of loop length on the dimensional properties ofsilk and model union knitted fabric, Indian Journal of Science and Technology,7,752-

754(2010).

6.

David H. Black., Design And Performance Of Weft-Knitting Machinery, a Ph.D thesisreport, 1968.

7. Efthymios Gravas., A Study on the Theoretical and Practical Application of Predictingthe Fabric Mass per Unit Area for Weft Single and Double Knitted Structures, a Ph.D

thesis report (2005).

8. Ghosh, S., and Banerjee, P. K., Mechanics of the single jersey weft knitting process,Textile Research Journal. 60,203-211(1990).

9. Ghosh.S., Effect of yarn characteristics on knitting performance, Textile Trends,31-33(1997).

10. J. J. F. Knapton and T. W.-Y. Lau., The design and dynamics of non-linear cams for usein high-speed weft-knitting machines part 1: the theoretical dynamics of non-linear

cams., Journal Of Textile Institute ,69,161-168(1978).

11. Knapton, J.J.F., and Munden, D.L., A study of mechanism of loop formation on weftknitting machinery ,Textile Research Journal 36, 1072-1090(1966).12. Knapton, J. J. F., the dynamics of weft knitting: further theoretical and mechanical

analysis, Textile Research Journal, 38,914-924(1968).

13. Knapton, J.J.F., and Munden, D.L., A study of mechanism of loop formation on weftknitting machinery, part II: the effect of yarn friction on yarn tension in knitting and loop

formation ,Textile Research Journal 36, 1081-1091(1966).

14. Srinivasulu K, Monica Sikka, and Hayavadana J., Study of loop formation process on1X1 V-Bed rib knitting Machine: A Mathematical Model, International Journal of

Textile and Fashion Technology, March(2013)

15. M. S. Burnip and s. M. A. Fahmy., Experimental studies of the dimensional Properties ofdouble-knit fabrics, Journal of Textile Institute, 9,272-282(1977).

16. Noboru Aisaka., Mathematcial considerations of weft knitting process, Journal Of TheTextile Machinery Society Of Japan,24,82-90(1971).

17. Nuiting. T.S., Kinetic Yam Friction and Knitting, Journal of Textile Institute, 51, 190-202(1960).

18. Noboru aisaka, and Tatsuya kawakami., knitting tension during weft knitting process,Journal of Textile Machinery Of Japan,22,228-233(1969).

19. Necia Ann Tou,An investigation of arcing in two structure weft knit fabrics, A ph.Dthesis, 2005.


12/12



270

20. Pietikaeinen, L., Influence Of Yarn Properties And Type Of Yarn Feeding On LoopFormation Process, Melliand Textilber, 10, 603-608(1981).

21. Ray, S.C., and Banerjee P.K., Some preliminary investigations into mechanics of 1x1 ribloop formation on a dial and cylinder machine, Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile

Research. 25, 97-107(2000).

22. Semnani, D., and Sheikhzadesh ,M .,Online control of knitted fabric quality, Journal ofEngineered Fibers And Fabrics ,1-5 ,2005.

23. Spencer, D.J., knitting technology, third edition, 85(2001), Woodhead PublishingLimited.

24. Sadhan chandra Ray., and Banerjee P.K., Mechanics of 1x1 rib loop formation on a dialand cylinder machine: part I- Modelling of the 1x1 rib loop formation process, Indian

Journal of Fibre & Textile Research. 28,185-196(2003).

25. Sadhan chandra Ray., and Banerjee P.K ., Mechanics of 1x1 rib loop formation on a dialand cylinder machine: part III-Validation of the Model, Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile

Research. 28,246-259(2003).

26.

Shusov E.Yu.,kudryavin, and Yu.S.Shustov, Mathematical determination of threadlength in the knitted loop, Fibre chemistry, 37(2), 2005.

27. T. Pusch., I. Wnsch, P. Offermann.,Dynamics of yarn tension on knitting machines,AUTEX Research Journal, 2, 54-63(2000).

28. T. W.-Y. Lau and J. J. F. Knapton., The design and dynamics of non-linear cams for useIn high-speed weft-knitting machines Part II: the analysis of knitting-yarn tensions with

Non-linear cams and negative feed, Journal of Textile Institute, 6,169-175(1978).

29. Tou, Necia Ann., An Investigation of Arcing in Two Structure Weft Knit Fabrics, a Ph.Dthesis report (2005).

30. W. Marvin and M. Mulchandani., Some Observations on Yarn Tension during Knitting,Supplement To The Textile Institute And Industry, 4-11(1965).

31. www.Ellis Developments Limited.com.32. Vivek Chauhan, Mukesh Verma, Sarabjot Singh and Prince, Optimization and Analysisof Coloring of Cotton Yarn System in Mat Manufacturing unit by using Reliability and

Availability Engineering, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering &

Technology (IJMET), Volume 3, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 217 - 225, ISSN Print: 0976 6340,

ISSN Online: 0976 6359.

study of loop formation process on 1x1 v-bed rib knitting machine

Documents