study of different flows over typical bodies by fluent
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent
Under the supervision ofDr. M.K. Laha
RAJIBUL ALAM14AE60R03
DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERINGIIT KHARAGPUR
![Page 2: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Inviscid flow over a wedge
Inviscid flow over a wedge is governed by continuity, momentum and energy equations which are given as follows.
Continuity equation:
Momentum equation:
Energy equation:
0.dSVdvt
0. Vt
fdvpdSVdSVVdvt
).(
zfzp
DtDw
yfyp
DtDv
xfxp
DtDu
dvVfdSpVdvqdSVVedvVet
).(..
.)22
()2
2(
![Page 3: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
).(..
)2
2( VfpVqVe
DtD
Assumptions:
Flow is steady Flow is adiabatic There are no viscous effects on the sides of the control volume which includes the
shock wave. There is no body force.
With above assumptions, the normal shock equations become as follows:
Continuity:
Momentum:
Energy:
Thus there are four unknowns. With addition of following thermodynamic relations, system becomes of 5 equations and 5 unknowns.
,
2211 uu
upup 222111
2
22
22
21
1V
hV
h
22 Tpch RTp 22
![Page 4: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
On solving the above system, we have following relations:
2)2cos(21
12sin21cot2tan
M
M
2/)1(2sin21
2sin21]2/)1[(1
)(2sin22
M
MM
)12sin21(
121
1
2
Mp
p
2sin2
1)1(2
2sin21)1(
1
2M
M
2
1
1
2
1
2
p
p
T
T
![Page 5: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
FOR FULL PRESENTATION CLICK http://rajibulalam.blogspot.in/2016/03/study-of-different-flows-over-typical.html
Now a the given problem,
With the previous relations, we can determine,
Numerical Solution for the Given Problem:
Fluent is used for a numerical solution.
Flow field dimensions are shown below.
o15KTatmpM 3001,11,31
2968.22 M atmp 78.22 477.4162 T
1.259m
1.5m
0.991m
0.5m
![Page 6: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Meshing:
Faced mapping is used which create quadrilateral meshing elements. The size of each element is taken as 0.05m. Also density based approach is used which is suitable for supersonic flow.
Material:
Fluid is assumed as ideal gas with specific heat constant 1000.43 J/Kg.K and molecular weight 28.966 Kg/mol. The wedge material is assumed as Aluminum.
FOR FULL PRESENTATION CLICK
http://rajibulalam.blogspot.in/2016/03/study-of-different-flows-over-typical.html
![Page 7: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Results:
Mach variation:
3,15 M
![Page 8: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Numerical vs. Analytical :
4.00E-01 6.00E-01 8.00E-01 1.00E+00 1.20E+00 1.40E+00 1.60E+000.00E+00
5.00E-01
1.00E+00
1.50E+00
2.00E+00
2.50E+00
3.00E+00
3.50E+00
Mach Number Comparision for M=3
Numerical Analytical
3,15 M
![Page 9: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Pressure variation:
3,15 M
![Page 10: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Numerical vs. Analytical :
: Numerical
: Analytical
4.00E-01 6.00E-01 8.00E-01 1.00E+00 1.20E+00 1.40E+00 1.60E+000.00E+00
5.00E+04
1.00E+05
1.50E+05
2.00E+05
2.50E+05
3.00E+05
3.50E+05
3,15 M
![Page 11: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Pressure coefficient:
3,15 M
![Page 12: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Numerical vs. Analytical :
4.00E-01 6.00E-01 8.00E-01 1.00E+00 1.20E+00 1.40E+00 1.60E+000.00E+00
5.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.50E-01
2.00E-01
2.50E-01
3.00E-01
3.50E-01
3,15 M
![Page 13: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Temperature variation:
3,15 M
![Page 14: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
4.00E-01 6.00E-01 8.00E-01 1.00E+00 1.20E+00 1.40E+00 1.60E+000.00E+00
5.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.50E+02
2.00E+02
2.50E+02
3.00E+02
3.50E+02
4.00E+02
4.50E+02
Numerical vs. Analytical :
![Page 15: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
MESH REFINEMENT:
It has been seen that changes across the shock wave is gradual whether in real cases, such changes are instantaneous. For a better picture of the situation, mesh refinement is done.
In the earlier case, simulation was done with 713 meshing elements. For mesh refinement purpose, number of elements is increased to 90,000. Following are the results obtained.
Mach variation:
3,15 M
![Page 16: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Numerical vs. Analytical :
3,15 M
![Page 17: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Pressure variation:
3,15 M
![Page 18: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
3,15 M
Numerical vs. Analytical:
![Page 19: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Pressure coefficient:
3,15 M
![Page 20: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
3,15 M
Numerical vs. Analytical
![Page 21: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Temperature:
3,15 M
![Page 22: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Numerical vs. Analytical
3,15 M
![Page 23: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Solution with increased Mach number: Now the free stream Mach number is increased to 5 keeping the geometry same and numerical solution is obtained with same type of meshing and size as that of for M=3.
• Analytical solution:
• M=3.5,
Numerical solution:
Mach Number:
atmp 78.42 KT 8.5202
5,15 M
![Page 24: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Numerical vs. Analytical
5,15 M
![Page 25: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Pressure:
5,15 M
![Page 26: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Numerical vs. Analytical
5,15 M
![Page 27: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Pressure coefficient:
5,15 M
![Page 28: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Numerical vs. Analytical
5,15 M
![Page 29: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Temperature
5,15 M
![Page 30: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Numerical vs. Analytical
5,15 M
![Page 31: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Viscous Flow over a Flat Plate
Boundary Layer Equations:
With boundary layer approximation, we have,
X-momentum equation as,
Y-momentum equation:
xp
yu
yuv
xuu
2
2
)(
yp
xv
yvv
xvu
2
2
)(
Assumptions:
v<<u, yu
xu
yv
xv
,0,0
yT
xT
Applying these assumptions, we have,
0yp
![Page 32: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Now for a flat plate, since u= =CONSTANT and v=0 outside the boundary layer, hence X-momentum equation gives, 0
xp
Thus boundary layer equations become,
0
yv
xu
2
2
yu
yuv
xuu
2
2
yT
yT
xTu
Continuity
Momentum
Energy
Analytical Solution Procedure:
• Blasius solved continuity and momentum equations by transforming the equations into a single ordinary differential equation.
• He did it by introducing a new independent variable called similarity variable.
![Page 33: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
• Blasius reasoned that when non dimensional velocity is plotted against non dimensional distance, it gives same variation at any point along the plate.
• Now introducing,
the two differential equations can be transformed into a single ordinary differential equation as,
y
)(
gUu
dgf )(
02 2
2
3
3
dfdf
dfd
It can be shown that u= and ddfU )(
21 f
ddf
xU
v
Now above ODE is solved by Runge Kutta method with known boundary equations.
On solving, following values are obtained.
![Page 34: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
f
0 0 0 0.332
0.5 0.042 0.166 0.331
1 0.166 0.33 0.323
1.5 0.37 0.487 0.303
2 0.65 0.63 0.267
2.5 0.996 0.751 0.217
3 1.397 0.846 0.161
3.5 1.838 0.913 0.108
4 2.306 0.956 0.064
4.5 2.79 0.980 0.034
5 3.283 0.992 0.016
5.5 3.781 0.997 0.007
6 4.28 0.999 0.002
1 0
Uu
ddf
2
2
dfd
![Page 35: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Thus when
Ux
Uxy
Uu //0.5,992.0
xU
/5
xeyw R
Udfd
xUU
yu 2
02
2
0332.0
xexf RC /664.0,
This gives,
Similarly,
Local skin friction coefficient becomes,
Numerical solution:
Geometry and flow field:
Flat plate is considered as two dimensional one with a length of 1m. The flow field and boundaries are shown in the following figure.
![Page 36: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Meshing:
Mapped face meshing is applied.
The upper and lower edges are given 500 divisions with no biasing.
On the other hand, the left and right side edges are given 500 numbers of divisions and biasing with biasing factor of 200.
There are 250000 elements with 250001 nodes.
![Page 37: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Set up:
Since the flow is incompressible one, hence pressure based solver is used.
Energy solution is kept off and viscous laminar type flow is chosen.
Boundary conditions:
The far field edge is given as symmetry boundary.
Inlet is given as velocity inlet boundary condition with inlet velocity 1m/s .
Plate is given as wall boundary condition while outlet is given as pressure outlet with gauge pressure=0.
![Page 38: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Results:
Normalized velocity vs. normalized distance at quarter chord point
Normalized velocity vs. normalized distance at half chord point
![Page 39: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Normalized velocity vs. normalized distance at three quarter chord point
Normalized velocity vs. normalized distance at the edge of the plate
![Page 40: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Now all the four plots are taken on the same plane to prove Blasius assumption.
![Page 41: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Wall shear stress distribution:
Numerical vs. Analytical:
![Page 42: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
SUPERSONIC FLOW OVER A CONE
First we will consider a general cone with z-axis as the axis of symmetry and aligned with the axis of the cone. Also free stream velocity is this direction i.e. along the axis of the cone.
![Page 43: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
FOR FULL PRESENTATION CLICK
http://rajibulalam.blogspot.in/2016/03/study-of-different-flows-over-typical.html
Formulation:
Now since body is axisymmetric, hence
Since properties are constant along any ray, hence
0
0r
Now continuity equation is,0)(
sin1)sin(
sin1)(1 2
2
Vr
Vr
Vrrr r
On simplification, 0cot2
VVVVr
![Page 44: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
When Bernoulli’s equation is associated with the above equation, it gives Taylor-McColl equation given by,
0))(()2)()((2
)1(2
2
2
2222
max
dVd
ddV
ddVV
ddV
dVd
ddVV
ddVVV rrr
rrrr
rr
r
Numerical solution:
A numerical solution of a cone of base radius 0.1 m is obtained in fluent.
Free stream Mach number is 2 and pressure is 101325 Pa.
Cone geometry is created through primitive geometry.
Flow field is chosen as rectangular parallelepiped of sides 10 m symmetrical about the coordinate axes.
![Page 45: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Meshing:
All the surfaces of the parallelepiped are named as far field boundary and cone surface is named as cone surface.
Default meshing is generated with 131567 elements.
FOR FULL PRESENTATION CLICK http://rajibulalam.blogspot.in/2016/03/study-of-different-flows-over-typical.html
Solution:
In the CFD post, pressure, temperature and density are plotted along a ray with coordinates (0, 0, 0) and (1, 1, 1) and following results are obtained.
![Page 46: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Pressure variation along the specified ray:
![Page 47: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Density along the given specified ray:
![Page 48: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Temperature distribution along a given ray:
![Page 49: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Flow past a sphere at low Reynold’s number (Creeping flow)
Creeping flow is the one that flows past a small sphere at very low Reynold’s number. Stoke gave solution for such a flow.
Relevant Equations:
Consider a flow past a sphere as shown in figure. Let the flow is in Z-direction. Due to axial symmetry,
0
0 V
0sin1)sin(1)(1 2
2
V
rV
rVr
rr r
0)sin(1)(1 22
VrVr
rr r
Continuity:
i.e.
(1)
Momentum equation:
Neglecting inertia, 02
Vp
![Page 50: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
cosVVr
sinVV
Now, at infinity, ,
These give, rrV ,sin2
22
Now associating this with continuity, momentum gives,
FOR FULL PRESENTATION CLICKhttp://rajibulalam.blogspot.in/2016/03/study-of-different-flows-over-typical.html
![Page 51: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Drag:
Radial strain is given by,
On the sphere surface, r=a. Hence,
Hence,
Tangential strain is given by,
At r=a,
Thus, total stress in Z direction= =
)23
23(cos
21
4
3
2 ra
raV
rVe r
rr
0rre
prr
sin
23)1)( 4
3
rVaV
rrV
rre r
r
sin23aVer
sincos rrr aVp 2
3cos
The constant part gives a net drag in Z direction which can be determined as,
D= Va6
deD RC 24
![Page 52: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Numerical solution for an inviscid flow past a small sphere at low Reynold’s number:
Geometry:A sphere of 0.1m radius is considered in a free stream of velocity 1 m/s. A spherical geometry is created through primitive geometry.
Meshing:
Default meshing is created with 65502 elements. Inlet and outlet surfaces are named as inlet and outlet while other surfaces are named as boundary wall. Sphere wall is named as sphere wall.
Set up:
Inlet is given as velocity inlet boundary condition, outlet is given as pressure outlet boundary condition while all other surfaces are given as symmetry boundary condition.
Result:
Plots from CFD post for drag and lift coefficients are obtained.
![Page 53: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
![Page 54: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Iteration Continuity x-velocity y-velocity z-velocity Energy265 8.9615e-
081.0145e-06
4.7521e-07
9.6569e-07
1.3218e-16
9.0248e-07
5.2368e-06
266 8.8382e-08
1.0089e-06
4.6785e-07
9.6178e-07
1.3117e-16
9.1195e-7
5.2367e-6
267 8.8382e-08
1.0046e-06
4.6123e-07
9.5837e-07
1.3274e-16
9.1759e-07
5.2384e-06
LC DC
Remarks: From Stoke’s theorem as well from symmetry, it is evident that drag as well lift are zero and hence their coefficients. This is obtained from the numerical solution too.
Convergent results table:
![Page 55: Study of different flows over typical bodies by Fluent](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062502/58a694b61a28abbd568b50cf/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
References: Modern Compressible Flow- John D Anderson
Viscous Fluid Flow- Frank M White
Notes On Advanced Environment Fluid Mechanics- C.C. Mei
Introduction To Aerodynamics- John D Anderson