structure no. 06656 - ct.gov-connecticut's …. p.l. all vehicles posted vert clearance on...

STRUCTURE NO. 06656

ROUTE 202over

BROOK

LITCHFIELD

Routine Inspection

on8/24/2006

Inspected by Team 5

forArea 7

/ of/I

TEAM: Forwarded to Senior Ketth DeBishop Date

SENIOR:

PERVI

Reviewed by Senior

BMM Required

Town Bndge

Rating <= 5 (Items 58,59,60 or 62)

Forwarded to Supervisor

Forwarded to "To Be COPied Drawer"

Date BRi·19 Entered

/?KO Date 9·02c-oC-

#}fJ#cJi~5

Date 1-~ (r 0(,Date

SUPPORT: Date Copies Made

NSf: No

BMMNo

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

BUREAU OF HIGHWAYS

Structure No. I 06656~==========Inspection Date 1_=-8/~2~4~/2~0~0~6~

~ of//

INSPECTION REPORT TRANSMITTAL FORM

Form BRI-27, Rev. 6/00

Town I LITCHFIELD=====:::::=::::=======Inspectors 1__--'T~e=.:a~m=-5~__

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Loose Forms (not bound in report)

Maintenance Memo

Flagging Memos

PONTIS Element Data Collection Form

Plan Sheets Already on file 0

Bound Report Pages

Title Cover Sheet

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Field Notes

Calculations: Load Rating Evaluation

Quantities & Cost Estimate

Photo Sheets

Photo Images

Forms

BRI-18, Bridge Inspection Form

BRI-19, Highway Bridge Inventory Form

Comments:[HI Attache_d_s_h_ee_t_s_, _

Number of SheetsEnclosed

91) Frequency Class:Inspection Team

Access Ragman r ...

ITJ- ITJ <CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTIONS ~

Type Frequency Team Date ~

~. E§ E§ L~ ~Fracture:

Uwater:

Special:

90) Inspection Date

~~Indepth Insp Deck Survey



BRIDGE SAFETY & EVALUATION

STRUCTURE EVALUATIONSHEET 1 OF 2 FORM BRI·19 REV 10100

SHEET3 OF-LL (INSP. REPORT)

% JA.,.,

Data Entry By:

Data Entry Date:oo

<.",,:::"""" ~ v~{r"''''''', &>

BS&E Received

Copies Made

Inspected By:

Bridge Number

IDENTIFICATION

Bridge Name 27) Year Built

TownName Lik~<.\J Town Code n 1~1':;B317IDI 42) Type of Service:5) Inventory Route: A) On

A) Record Type i ~ D) Rou1e Number ~ 28) Number of Lanes:B) Signing Prefix'· E) Directional Suffix ---- - . 0 A) On

C) Level 01 Service .; 29) Average Daily Traffic

6) Feature Intersected 109) Percent Truck

30) Year of ADTu...lL.J.::.............,'-LL..3..---I.---'---JL..-.L-.............L--'--L---I.---'---JL..-.L-.............L--'--L---I.---''--~7) Facility Carried: 19) Bypass, Detour Length

AGE AND SERVICE

~ 106) Year Reconstructed

C€~7'::>rn B) Under

~ _ B) Un<ier_~HalIADT?:

%

miles

~

~

~~

B) Right

It

It

It

sqlt

deg

It in

It

It

It in

Ref It in

Ref It;,It

GEOMETRIC DATA

It

It

___________ BRIDGE COMMENTS _

48) Length of Max Span

49) Structure Length

50) Curb or Sidewalk Widths:

A) Left It [QIQ].~51) Brg Rdwy widlh,curb-curb

52) Deck Width, 0U1-0ut

32) Approach Roadway Width

33) Bridge Median

Deck Area

34) Skew Angle

35) Structure Flared

10 )Inv. Rte. Min. Vert Clearance

47) Log Inv. Rte. Total Horiz Clr.:

47) RLog Inv. Rte. Total Horiz. CIr.:

53) Min Vert Clearance Over Bridge

54) Min Vert Under Clearance

55) Min Lat Under Clearance on Right

56) Min Lat Under Clearance on Lelt

[lllI

L....L.....Jsec

%ITJ

~~

sec ITI]deg

sec ITI]deg

ITI] B) Percent Responsibility

min

min

STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL

43) Structure Type. Main:

A) Material - ~ B) Design Type

44) Structure Type, Approach:

A) Material _' 0 B) Design Type

45) Number 01 Spans, Main Un~

46) Number of Approach Spans

107) Deck Structure Type

108) Wearing Surfac&'Protective System:

A) Type of Wearing Surface

B) Type of Membrane

C) Type of Deck Protection

99) Border Bridge Structure No

~

(p

60<

NBIS Length

~

I 1 1 I-J

Date

---- APPRAISALS

Bridge Number

Town Name

67) Structure Evaluation

E 68) Deck Geometry

69) Under Clear Ver1 & Horiz

71) Waterway Adequ<K:y

• ~ '72) Approach Rdwy Alignment

113) SCour Critical

I

INSPECTION COMMENTS --------

(INSP. REPORTlI Facility Carried

Feature Crossed

-----------_&_-----------LOAD RATING AND POSTING

~Evaluation Code

Year 01 Evaluation

o=J 70) Bridge Posting

o=J 41) Structure Status

CONDITION ----

OF

Items 58 Thru 72 Checked By:

36) Traffic Salety Features:

A) Bridge Railings

B) Transitions

C) Approach Guardrail

D) Approach Guardrail End

STRUCTURE EVALUATIONSHEET 2 OF 2 FORM BRI-19 REV 10100

58) Deck

59) Superstructure

60) Substructure

61) Channel & Chan. Protection

62) Culver1s

REVIEWED BY: {.- \ L/-~ /~ - r •>

31) Design Load

63) Operating Rating Type

64) Operati.ng Rating

65) Inventory Rating Type

66) Inventory Rating

Inspected By:

SHEET

n Proposed Next Indepth Insp Year

n Senior

mph Supervisor

~

I

I

I

I--

L-

~

tons

tons

tons

tons

tons

EE:

-----------OTHER FEATURES

-_.::.._-======-- Fence Required fT.: ~ Barrel Ladder

Fence Present ' Stand Pipes

Fence Height ',' It 0 0 . 0 It Cat WalksFence Type • Movable Inspection System

Fence Material __ ·1 Loose Concrete Checked?

Fence Top Type

I

It

ADT I I

WATERWAY

CLASSIFICATION

tons I Actual P.L 4Me Trucktons Rec. P.L. 4Me Truck

tons Actual P.L 382 Truck

tons Rec. P.L. 382 Truck

tons Actual PL All Vehicles

It' inIt in...mph

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

Other Posted Signs 1


Actual P.L. Single Unit Truck

Rec. P.L. Single Unit Truck

Actual P.L. Semi-TrailerTruck

Rec. P.L. Semi-TrailerTruck

Rec. P.L. All Vehicles

Posted Vert Clearance On Bridge

Posted Ver1 UnderClearance

Posted Speed Umit

VtilityL:lility

75A) Type of Work Proposed

75B) Work Done By

76) Length of Struct. Improvement P! ~ It

94) Bridge Improvement Cost $

95) Roadway Improvement Cost $

96) Totai Project Cost $

97) Year of Improvement Cost Est.

114) Fu1ureADT ~115)YearFu1Ure

Ust No. Project No. I _ .' Adver1ised

POSTED SIGNS & UTILITIES

DrainageBasinCode

38) Navigation Control

39) Navigation Ver1 Clr. lQIQIQI 40) Navigation Horiz Clr.

116) Ver1-UIt Brg Nav Min

111) Pier Abutment Protection

112) NBIS Bridge Length

104) Highway System

26) FunctionaJ Class .

1(0) Delense Highway

101) Parallel Structure

102) Direction of Traffic

103) Temporary Structure

110) Designated National Network

20) Toll

21) Maintain

22) Owner

Repor1 Class

37) Historical Significance

SO,FI/

BRIDGE #: I 06656

Connecticut Department of Transportation

Bridge Inspection Report BRI-18

INSPECTION DATE: 1812412006

FEATURE CARRIED: I~R=-O=-U=-T~E=20=2=====-- __FEATURE INTERSECTED IBROOK

MAIN DESIGN: ICulvert (includes frame cuiv I

INSPECTION TYPE: IRoutine I PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATE:

INSPECTION PERFORMED BY: I~T=ea=m=5:====~1

TOWN: ILITCHFIELD====::==;::::::::::::::::;:::::::::==

LOCATION: 11 MI S OF TORR. TL

MAIN MATERIAL: IL..:S_tee_1 _

SNOOPER REQUIRED: ~

SNOOPER USED: ~

YEAR BUILT: 11950 I

YEAR REBUILT: D

INSPECTION VISITS:

Inspection Date: 1812, 1Temperature: 79 0 F

Start Time:~~~

End Time:'---_......

INSPECTORS:

Inspector: 1"="0-::.T:-a"""mo-n-::t-

Inspector: IK Weir

Task: 1Inventory Structure

Task: IInventory Structure

58. DECK I OVERAllL RATING mMI!!jQ

OVERLAY mI":O""v-e-:"rla-y-s-:"h-o-ws-s-o-m-e-t-ra-n-sv-e-rs-e-&-:-:-lo-n-g"""itu-d-::"in-a-:"l-c-ra-c""ks-o-p-e-n-u-p-t"-0-1'"'I2:-:-in-c""h-.A:-I-so-,-:"(""1)-::f"-ul:-'WI....,..,·dt"'"h-----,

transverse crack open up to 2 inches +/-.See photo 2.

DECK STR. CONDITION [E]CURBS [E]

MEDIAN [E]SIDEWALKS [E]

PARAPET [E]RAILING [E]

PAINT [E]FENCE [E]

DRAINS [E]LIGHTING STANDARD [E]UTILITIES TYPE/SIZE [E]

CONSTRUCTION JOINTS [E]EXPANSION JOINTS [E]

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE OVERALL RATING [[I

60. SUBSTRUCTURE OVERALL RATING [[]

61. CHANNEL PROTECTION OVERALL RATING mRATIIjG

CHANNEL SCOUR II] l":"L-o-ca-::l-s-co-u-r-u-p...,.t-o""::2-::.S:-f=-ee-t,.-e-x-p-os...,.i-ng.....,...b-ac-:"k-s""id"-e"""fr-e-e-e-n"'"d-o""ft""h-e-s-ou-th""-w-es-t-Wl-::'-ngw-a-:"II=-,-ca-u-s-e"'"d""fr-om-----'

alignment of channel.Also, local scour at outlet end from 15 inch diameter (accmp) in the southeast wingwall.

EMBANKMENT EROSION~ Embankment erosion along the southwest wingwaU.See above item.

DEBRIS~ IEncroachment limits channel flow.

VEGETATION ~ IHeavy vegetation growth.See photos 15 & 16.

Printed on 813112006 2:14:16 PM Page 1 of 3

BRIDGE #: I 06656 I

61. CHANNEL PROTECTION


Bridge Inspection Report BRI-i8

INSPECTION DATE: 1812412006 IOVERALL RATING m

CHANNEL CHANGE~ Channel enters culvert at a 90 degree angle and the encroachment directs the flow along thefree end of southwest wingwall and limits channel flow.

FENDER SYSTEM I[] 1

=====================~SPUR DIKES & JETIIES I[] I======================

RIP RAP I[] 1 _

62. CULVERTS & RETAINING WALL 1 I OVERALL RATING m~ ----------------------------------,

BARRELl[] 1======================CONCRETE I[] 1

~====:::===================~STEEL~ (ACCMP)

7 Plates. 6 inch by 1-3/4 by 3/16 inch corrugations.Areas of protective coat peeling,isolated areas of staining & small chips in paint.Invert shows moderate pitting with moderate to heavy rust.First 11 feet +/- at inlet shows perforation holes up to 9 inches long by 2 inches wide alongnorth side.Mid point of culvert shows random perforation holes up to 1/2 inch +/- in diameter along southside.Last 8 feet at outlet shows isolated perforation holes up to 6 inches long up to 2-3/8 inches widealong north side.See photos 5 thru 8.

TIMBER I[] 1

~::;::;=:;:=::::;::=:======;::;::::;::::::===:=~:::::::=;===:==::==~:==::::::;:=;=:====~HEADWAll [] East Headwall shows areas of light scale and hairline cracks at north with some light

efflorescence.

CUTOFF WAll I[] INot Visible.

~====:=::=::=.==~=:=====;:~==:====:====::::::==:::==:=:::==;==~DEBRIS~ Moderate accumulation of silt & brush up to 1.5 feet +/- at inlet end extending for 6 feet +/- into

pipe.See photos 3, 9 &10.

RETAINING WAll STEM [[] Southeast wingwall with a 15 inch diameter (accmp) shows light scale & vegetation growth ontop.Northeast wingwall shows hairline cracks with light to moderate efflorescence.Southwest wingwall shows (1) isolated vertical hairline crack.Northwest wingwall covered with heavy vegetation growth.See photos 11 thru 14.

FOOTING I[] INot Visible.

APPROACH CONDITION '-- ----', OVERAll RATING [[)

MIlliQ

APPROACH SLAB I[]1.------------------------------

RELIEF JOINTS I[] 1

APPROACH GUIDE RAil [] ~(M:=:=;:B:;::R::=)=:at=w=es=::=t.==========================~Weak sts at east, some d north.

APPROACH PAVEMENT [[] Bituminous concrete shows transverse & longitudinal cracks open up to 1/2 inch +/-.See hoto 1.

APPROACH EMBANKMENT [] Paved runoff at the southeast and some roadway runoff erosion.

TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES:

BRIDGE RAILINGS I[] I'------------------------------

Printed on 8/3112006 2:14:16 PM Page 2 of 3

BRIDGE #: I 06656 I

7oF//Connecticut Department of Transportation

Bridge Inspection Report BRI-18

INSPECTION DATE: 1812412006 IAPPROACH CONDITION I OVERALL RATING m

TRANSITlONS [[] I I1iUl1~==============1APPROACH GUARDRAILS ~ .

APPR. GUARDRAIL ENDS [[] I ILOAD POSTING

SINGLE UNIT (TONS) D I~==================

HS(TONS) D I~======================:::::::;4 AXLE (TONS) D

~=====================3S2(TONS) D~=====================ADVANCE WARNING YIN D~====================~LEGIBILITY D:====================VISIBILITY/LOCATION D'------------------------------

MISC.

MIN VERT. UNDERCLR. ~.~ ..I~========================:=;POSTEDCLR.UNDERBRIDGEO'O"';::========================:::::::;

POSTEDCLR.ON BRlDGE O'O"~I=======================~ADVANCEWARNING(YIN) I Noll========================

SPEED LIMIT (IF ANY) DMPH '===========================CHARACTER OF TRAFFIC 1 _

ADDITIONAL NOTES

IFirst Inspection.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Culvert done South to North.West is inlet end.

Inspectors' Signatures: 1)

2)

Date:

Date:

~~dootP

cf.,3/;~

P.E. Signature:

P.E.#:

Reviewed by:

3)

4)

Date: __ , __ ,__

Date: __ , __ ,__

Date: __ ' __ '__

Printed on 8/3112006 2:14:16 PM Page 3 of 3

8oF//

Bridge No._06656 Condition rating: _4__ ProgramList:

Steel Culvert Assessment Program - Fall 2003

Date Inspected: _08-24-06 Inspection Interval:

Inspectors: Team 5

Location: _I Mi. South of Torrington & Litchfiels Town Line_

Year Built: (EST) 1950 Design dimension: 9 FT BY 6 FT

Amount of cover: 3 FT +/-.

Is the crown deformed? Yes No X jf yes, comment below-- - --

Has the shape changed? Yes__ No x if yes, comment below(Measurements at both ends and at 25-foot intervals, conditions may warrant more)

Is the bottom deteriorated? Yes x No if yes, comment below-- --Perforation boles up to at inlet,center & outlet up to 9 incbes long up to 2 incheswide.

Cracks at springline? Yes No x if yes, comment below-- --

Any abnormalities in the roadway surface? Yes No x if yes,-- --comment below

Additional comments (i.e. corrosion, bolt condition) _Areas of protective coat peeling.Invert - moderate pitting with moderate to heavyrust

9oF//

8 ft from outlet end Marked with orange p~

9' 2-1/4"6'02"

33 ft - center9' 03-1/2 "6' 1/2"

Litchfield Br# 06656 US Route 202 0/ Brook8/24/2006

8 ft from inlet9' 03"6'00"

SpanRise

ORGANIZATION UNIT NO. WORK ORDER NO.

State of ConnecticutDepartment of Transportation

Bureau of Engineering & Highway OperationsDES-003 REV 1-93

(302·06·0225)COMPUTATION SHEET / tJ 7 SHEET NO.

/0

\l1\ ~ tiT- r ,. ......

< \(,1"

\'\1- ttr1l1

~ -<.EII>I \ \1 . .

Printed on Recycled or Recovered Paper

ORGANIZATION UNIT NO. WORK ORDER NODATE PREPARED

R -, - '1 'YJ<cDATE CHECKED

PREPARED BY

- EPm <"CHECKED BY

State at ConnecticutDepartment of Transportation

Bureau of Engineering & Highway OperationsDES-003 REV 1-93

(302-06-0225)COMPUTATION SHEET /..307 SHEET NO// nF//

00o/~

!lGG YY' Po

U/(N_- /oF/"-d./ SkEW

7 Ii's -h IX /1/:;- 3//t, II7?lIC/('

o

!lS r 8 ~/ flo,(I9;rFb />~,..p, HbJE

{/'" TO to" .(0A/(;7 c"" 7""0 ;:;,-}!g" To' E".

AI':. ,t'7/i £;rtJ £

/,F;-w- "'/-1 $N/F ;: Ala r

1/" At/01 y" /'/1',/)£ ..o/.r~ ~'b.n'.T

S ()C; '" srt:::.6 .

/'7'/./oN'I;y"?'lJtJ ,4c~. o/" STJ r t7,f}pu 1-/

To ./, S "?"r,h'.;zl'l

;p.>;r //"r--/) .;OEIi'F hlp/r~ ~r' TO

9,' .., II r-,/e>IJ"&)(' C/- IN.rlic )NDRrN .s:rVE

/lI!EIJS o/"~RorEcr%V£,tO~~1rN~

fNVe.t'/-/lJoiJ.//z.?/fA ~ wI{nO./.;.

70 Alvy Rv,s,-r: SEc /-",,-Rt::"}/o1F.. ~& 15,

I Ifa;:

" k- V.PI' "/"..r,

.~-. -.~

---

c.l ,--- ~.

-

Jv iJ!_ .....t1 (..1""

I I~/

SUBJECT:

:'.r7CijFfE1.

..J.OC~ SO'" T"o;l.S,c.rj E/)(f~tV{?

AA r G F

h'EEF/-/i:' oFWrM'wA1L...

Printed on Recycled or Recovered Paper

Bridge No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23,2006Feature Crossed: Brook

Photo # 1Looking South from the North approach. {Bucket truckparked at structure.

Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT..doc

Photo # 2Wearing surface.

Page 1

Bridge No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KJRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23,2006Feature Crossed: Brook

Photo # 3Inlet. {West}


Photo # 4Outlet. {East}

Page 2

Bridge No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23, 2006Feature Crossed: Brook

Photo # 5Looking in from the inlet.


Photo # 6Holes in the invert near the inlet.

Page 3


Photo # 7Looking in from the outlet.


Photo # 8Holes in the invert near the outlet.

Page 4


Photo # 9Debris built-up at the inlet.


Photo # 10Looking at the debris built-up at the inlet from inside thepipe.

Page 5

Brid2e No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23, 2006Feature Crossed: Brook

Photo # 11The Southwest wingwall.

Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT.. doc

Photo # 12The Northwest wingwall.

Page 6

Brid~e No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23, 2006Feature Crossed: Brook

Photo # 13The Southeast wingwall.


Photo # 14The Northeast wingwall.

Page 7


Photo # 15Looking upstream from the inlet.

Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT. .doc

Photo # 16Looking downstream from the outlet.

Page 8

STRUCTURE NO. 06656

ROUTE 202over

BROOK

LITCHFIELD

Special Inspection

on9/19/2007

Inspected by Team 6

for Area 5

TEAM: Forwarded to Senior Keith DeBishop Date 9/2812007

Rating = 5 (Items 58.59,60 or 62)

SENIOR:

BMM ReqUIred

Town Bndge

Forwarded to Superv sor

Forwarded to "To Be Copied Drawer"

Date BRI 19 Entered

(?J<D I' /0/2- /07;Va~t/

'fC"J

w'- D I /r: Ir/l 7~ Date

SUPPORT: Date Copies Made

NBI: No

BMMNo

90) Inspection Date Inspection Team 91) Frequency Class

CCIILIJ 7~ 24 01

Indepth Insp Deck Survey Access Flagman0oCO o[I]

--- <CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTIONS ~

Type Frequency Team Date ~

012W 5W4124/2007 I

10

~0(INSP. REPORT)

EVALUATIONSHEET 1 OF 2 FORM BRI-19 REV 10/00

SHEET-'--- OF



BRIDGE SAFETY & EVALUATION

?

CJ(. l fiL.!J'rl¥ &CA- H 4Qh !! !

STRUCTURE

BS&E Received 0 Data Entry By:

Copies Made 0 Data Entry Date:

Sufficiency Rating 68

Previous Inspection Date 8/24/2006

Inspected By:

Bridge Number

n

lft

n

n

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

ft

sc

~

0000 ITIIJ

o

rrfttE~

0.0 ft.~r

r. ....

r T

I I I I I ,I

I ftl i

I. _f1. f

I ftl i

Ref I ftl 1Ref 1._1

I. '-- '

5 WATERWAY

Oin B

B) Right

99 in

99 in

Oft

0.0 ft

0.0 ft

B) Under

CO B) Under 0

CCIILIJ Half ADT?:

6"10

2005

omiles

GEOMETRIC DATA

10 ft

10 ft

8800

48) Length of Max Span

49) Structure length

50) Curb or Sidewalk Widths.

A) left 0.0 ft [=r=J. D51) Brg Rdwy width,curb-curb 42.0 ft

52) Deck Width, Out-Out 0.0 ft

32) Approach Roadway Width 42 ft

33) Bridge Median 0 No Median

Deck Area 660 sqft

34) Skew Angle 21 deg

35) Structure Flared 0

10 )Inv. Rte. Min. Vert Clearance 99 ft

47) Log Inv. Rte. Total Horiz Clr.: 42.0 ft

47) Rlog Inv. Rte. Total Horiz. Clr.: ft

53) Min Vert Clearance Over Bridge 99 ft

54) Min Vert Under Clearance Ref

55) Min Lat Under Clearance on Right Ref

56) Min Lat Under Clearance on left

___________ BRIDGE COMMENTS _

sec

sec

"loCO

~§

~

43370 ITIIIJ

Other

I I .1r 1 1min I. l

I 1 1min I. i

D) Route Number 00202

E) Directional Suffix 0

Town Code

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

§

o B) Design Type 19 Culvert (includes fra CO

o B) Design Type 0

ITI] B) Percent Responsibility

IDENTIFICATION

STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL

State Highway

Mainline

BROOK

40.59 Miles

41 deg 46 min 23.98 sec ITI]deg

73deg 10 min 15.45 sec ITI]deg

43) Structure Type, Main:

A) Material 3 Steel

44) Structure Type, Approach:

A) Material 0 Other

45) Number of Spans, Main Uni1 1

46) Number of Approach Spans 0

107) Deck Structure Type

108) Wearing Surface/Protective System:

A) Type of Wearing Surface INB) Type of Membrane I!'lC) Type of Deck Protection N

99) Border Bridge Structure No

Bridge Name

Town Name LITCHFIELD

5) Inventory Route:

A) Record Type 1

B) Signing Prefix 3

C) level of Service 1

6) Feature Intersected

---__-----;::::;;:::;:-y-~A~GEAND SERVICE27) Year Built 1950 0 , , I 106) Year Reconstructed

42) Type of Service:

A) On 1 Highway D28) Number of Lanes:

A) On 2

29) Average Daily Traffic

__ 109) Percent Truck

''''-''-T'--""'-"-T'-''''-''-Y'-r'-"r-T'-T'--"...-"-T'--""'-"-T'-''''-''-Y'-r'-,'r-T'---" 30) Year of ADT

19) Bypass, Detour length7) Facility Carried ROUTE 202'-1-o,--r,...:;.r-I~,"':':':',--r'---Y-I -',r--ol---r,---r"1-',r--T,----'l , , , 1

9) Location 1 MI S OF TORR. Tl1 , , , , , I , o::::::o:III:II , , , I , CD

No ~No

No

No

No

I I I I I

~

Date

Barrel Ladder

Stand Pipes

Cat Walks

Movable Inspection System

Loose Concrete Checked?

APPRAISALS

67) Structure Evaluation 4

68) Deck Geometry N

69) Under Clear Vert & Horiz N

71) Waterway Adequacy 6

72) Approach Rdwy Alignment 8

113) Scour Critical

INSPECTION COMMENTS

~

(~4~

No

No

0.0 ft

ooo

CONDITION

Items 58 Thru 72 Checked By:

36) Traffic Safety Features:

A) Bridge Railings 0

B) Transitions 0

C) Approach Guardrail 0

D) Approach Guardrail End 0

58) Deck

59) Superstructure

60) Substructure

61) Channel & Chan. Protection

62) Culverts

REVIEWED BY M &~ ~

Fence Required

Fence Present

Fence Height

Fence Type

Fence Material

Fence Top Type

Inspected By: V~ & l}...~C~LOAD RATING AND POSTING

o ~ Evaluation Code J5 Year of Evaluation 1950

63.0 CD 70) Bridge Posting 5

5 41rstructure Status A

36.0 CD Open, no restriction

31) Design Load

63) Operating Rating Type

64) Operating Rating

65) Inventory Rating Type

66) Inventory Rating

-----------OTHER FEATURES

STRUCTURE EVALUATION IBridge Number 06656 NBIS Length

SHEET 2 OF 2 FORM BRI-19 REV 10/00 Town Name LITCHFIELD No 10

., i./ IFacility Carried ROUTE 202 -;HEET~ OF-----.:.L (INSP. REPORT

Feature Crossed BROOK

n Proposed Next Indepth Insp Year

n Senior

mp~ Supervisor

--

I

I

I

~I

ft

ADT I

tons I Actual P.L. 4Axle Truck tonstons Rec. P.L. 4Axle Truck tons

tons Actual P.L. 3S2 Truck tons

tons Rec. P.L. 3S2 Truck tons

tons Actual P.l. All Vehicles tons

ft in EEftft in It

mph

WATERWAY

o Not on national network

3 On Free Road

1 State Highway Agency

1 State Highway Agency

S STATE

o

CLASSIFICATION

No

1 On System

2 Rural Principal Arterial - Other

1 Defense Highway

N No parallel structure exists

2 2-way traffic

6799

o No navigation control on waterway

r=ITI 40) Navigation Horiz Clr. 0

oo Not applicable

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS



Actual P.L. Single Unit Truck

Rec. P.L. Single Unit Truck

Actual P.l. Semi-TrailerTruck

Rec. P.L. Semi-TrailerTruck

Rec. P.L. All Vehicles

Posted Vert Clearance On Bridge

Posted Vert UnderClearance

Posted Speed limit

Utility

DrainageBasinCode

38) Navigation Control

39) Navigation Vert Clr. 0

116) Vert-lift Brg Nav Min

111) Pier Abutment Protection

75A) Type of Work Proposed

75B) Work Done By

76) Length of Struct. Improvement - ft

94) Bridge Improvement Cost $

95) Roadway Improvement Cost $

96) Total Project Cost $

97) Year of Improvement Cost Est.

114) FutureADT I I I ~115)YearFuture

list No. Project No. Advertised

POSTED SIGNS & UTILITIES

112) NBIS Bridge Length

104) Highway System

26) Functional Class

100) Defense Highway

101) Parallel Structure

102) Direction of Traffic

103) Temporary Structure

110) Designated National Network

20) Toll

21) Maintain

22) Owner

Report Class

37) Historical Significance


Non-Routine Bridge Inspection Report BRI-20

BRIDGE #: I 06656 I INSPECTION DATE: [9/19/2007 PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATE 14/24/2007

OTHER INSPECTIONS

D Freq. D Assigned To: I 01

D D I 01D I 01

SPECIAL: Type

FRACTURE:

UNDERWATER:

INSPECTION TYPE: ISpecial DESCRIPTION: CHECK CONDITION AND SHAPE SNOOPER REQUIRED: ~DIMENSIONS OF PIPE ARCH.

INSPECTION PERFORMED BY: 16 : '-- ----' SNOOPER USED: [§]FEATURE CARRIED: [ROUTE 202 1

FEATURE INTERSECTED: ISROOK 1

TOWN: IUTCHFIELO 1 YEAR BUILT: 11950 I

LOCATION: 11 MI S OF TORR. TL IYEAR REBUILT: DMAIN MATERIAL: ISteel IMAIN DESIGN: ICulvert (includes frame I

INSPECTION VISITS:

Start Time:1--:-:-:-:--:-:-:1

End Time:'--_----J

INSPECTORS:

Inspector: ICT.--'M""'u-rp""'hy--'

Inspector: 10. McClave

Task: ISPECIAL INSPECTION

Task: 1_" _

FEATURE INSPECTED:

A.C.C.M.P.P.A. WITH DETERIORATION AT INVERT AND HOLES RUSTED THROUGH CORRUGATIONS.

INSPECTION RESULTS:

THE INVERT PLATES HAVE 1 FOOT WIDE BANDS OF HEAVY LAMINAR RUST WITH SECTION LOSS AT WATER LINEALONG BOTH SIDES. THE UPPER 2/3 OF THE PIPE HAS ASPHALT COATING IN PLACE. THE FIRST 11 FEET AT INLETSHOWS HOLES COMPLETELY THROUGH BOnOM CORRUGATIONS 18 INCH LONG BY 2 INCHES WIDE ALONG NORTHSIDE. THERE IS A 6 FOOT SECTION OF INVERT THAT HAS CORRUGATIONS KINKED AND HEAVED UP SLIGHTLY. THEINLET BOnOM LIP HAS BEEN REPAIRED WITH CONCRETE. (SEE PHOTO) SMALL HOLES ARE WIDE SPREADTHROUGHOUT INVERT. RISE AND SPAN MEASUREMENTS WERE TAKEN. PAVEMENT HAS A FULL WIDTHTRANSVERSE CRACK OPEN 3/4 INCH. THERE ARE ALSO LONGITUDINAL AND RANDOM CRACKS.

ACTION TO BE TAKEN:

THIS CULVERT WILL CONTINUE TO BE CHECKED AT 6 MONTH INTERVALS.

Inspectors' Signatures: 1)

2)

3)

4)

P.E. Signature:

P.E.#:

Date: CLIL1/~7

Date: _tl Lf/~J

Date: -- I__ I_-

Date: -- I__ I_-

Date: -- I__ 1_-

Reviewed by: COOT

Printed on 9/19/2007 1:24:28 PM Page 1 of 1

LITCHFIELD, RT. 202 OVER BROOK, BRIDGE # 6656

RISE & SPAN DIMENSIONS

8' IN 33' IN 8'--OUTDATE8/24/2006 SPAN 9'-03" 9'-03 1/2" 9'-02 1/4"

RISE 6'-00" 6'-0 1/2" 6'-02"

4/24/2007 SPAN 9'-03 1/2" 9'-03 1/4" 9'-02 1/2"RISE 6'-00" 6'-01 " 6'-02 1/2"

9/19/2007 SPAN 9'-03" 9'-03 1/2" 9'-02 1/2"RISE 6'-00" 6'-0 1/2" 6'-02"

structure no. 06656 - ct.gov-connecticut's …. p.l. all vehicles posted vert clearance on...

Documents