structuralist criticism

11
Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor

Upload: jheng-asuncion

Post on 05-Dec-2014

447 views

Category:

Education


33 download

DESCRIPTION

(file from my professor)

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Structuralist criticism

Catherine WishartAdjunct Instructor

Page 2: Structuralist criticism

Studies the systems of relationships that are embedded in words and items, “and shows us the ways in which we think” (Guerin 369).

Acknowledges the arbitrariness of assigning certain series of letters to represent specific ideas.

Focuses on the opposites that often appear in literary constructs.

Page 3: Structuralist criticism

Ferdinand de Saussure, professor at University of Geneva, Switzerland, developed structural linguistics between 1906 and 1911. This approach attempts to study literature from

an objective perspective. Looks at the surface structure of the text.

Claude Levi-Strauss introduced the binary approach to structuralism. Studying opposites and how they interplay in the

text.

Page 4: Structuralist criticism

Levi-Strauss wrote Structural Anthropology in 1950s. He closely examined paired opposites (binary

oppositions) that creep into works – sometimes intentionally, and sometime unintentionally.

He also closely examined double entendres, statements that could be interpreted in two different ways. Example: in “Young Goodman Brown,” Brown laments,

“My Faith is gone!” This can be interpreted as his wife (note the capital letter for Faith), or it can be interpreted as his religious faith.

Searching texts for binary oppositions, or paired opposites, is a practical method of applying structuralist analysis to a literary work.

Page 5: Structuralist criticism

Fairy Tales: Cinderella Cinderella is pretty, while step-sisters are

ugly Cinderella is penniless, while step-sisters

have money Cinderella is good, while step-sisters are evil Loses one slipper, but keeps the other Cinderella has a complete reversal of fortune,

as do her step-sisters. (DiYanni 1584)

Page 6: Structuralist criticism

“There are combinations of very simple natural objects which have the power of thus affecting us” (150). Objects can stand for something else in our mind.

“mansion of gloom” (150). Opposite imagery juxtaposed in the same sentence. Mansions are normally viewed as beautiful, impressive. Gloom is the antithesis of a mansion.

Opposites of narrator knowing Roderick as a boy and now they are adults.

The study is lofty with black oaken floors. Contrary imagery. While the furniture is tattered, there are still servants. Complete change in Usher’s appearance – reversal. “His action was alternatively vivacious and sullen” (152).

Binary opposites. Poetry embedded in prose.

Page 7: Structuralist criticism

The sequence of events from beginning to end

The rearrangement of the narrative to build suspense or for aesthetic effects (The death of Tessie in “The Lottery”)

Flashbacks Unequal treatment of time Shifts in viewpoints or speakers

Page 8: Structuralist criticism

Codes developed by Barthes:1. The code of actions asks the reader to find

meaning in the sequence of events.2. The code of puzzles raises questions to be

answered. 3. The cultural code refers to all systems of

“knowledge and values invoked by a text.”4. The connotative code expresses themes

developed around the characters.5. The symbolic code refers to the theme as we

have generally considered it, that is, the meaning of the work.

(Guerin 375).

Page 9: Structuralist criticism

Structuralist Theory was the basis for Formalist Theory.

Structuralist Theory is used by important French philosophers: Rationalists:

Voltaire Jean-Paul Sartre

French terminology is often used in Structuralism.

Page 10: Structuralist criticism

1. What are the elements of the work – words, stanzas, chapters, parts, for example – and how can these be seen as revealing “difference”?

2. How do the characters, narrators, speakers, or other voices heard in the work reveal difference?

3. How do the elements of the work’s plot or overall action suggest a meaningful pattern? What changes, adjustments, transformations, shifts of tone, attitude, behavior, or feeling do you find?

4. How are the work’s primary images and events related to one another? What elements of differentiation exist, and what do they signify?

5. What system of relations could be used to link this work with others of its kind?

6. What system of relations could be used to link this work with others of its kind? What system of relations could be used to link this work with different kinds of things with which it shared some similarities?

(DiYanni 1585)

Page 11: Structuralist criticism

DiYanni, Robert. Literature Approaches to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2004. Print.

Guerin, Wilfred L., Labor, Earle, Morgan, Lee, Reesman, Jeanne C., and Willingham, John R. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. 5th ed. NY: Oxford UP, 2005. Print.