structural health monitoring (shm) of timber beams and · pdf filestructural health monitoring...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders
Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014
Dr John C Moore MIEAust MIPWEA Adjunct Lecturer in Civil Engineering, University of New England, NSW.
1 Gostwyck, NSW (Moore 2013)
![Page 2: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• Bridges
• Interpret Data
• Measuring elasticity
• Prediction of girder failure
• Understand girder degradation path
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0
0
0 . 0 5
0 . 1
0 . 1 5
0 . 2
0 . 2 5
Load & Strength Magnitude
Pro
babi
lity
Den
sity ← Load
Distribution
← StrengthDistribution
FailureRegion
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
2A, 15 years 2B, 45 years
123
4
Ironbark
2A
2B
Introduction and Background
![Page 3: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
![Page 4: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
New timber composite bridge
4
New bridge at Bretti, NSW with: • Timber girders; • Steel piles; and • Concrete deck Built by RTA & Gloucester Shire in 2010
Leslies Bridge, The original low level bridge at Bretti NSW over the Manning River.
![Page 5: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Method to determine Safety Index
1. Record all vehicle mid-span deflections 2. Use a vehicle of known mass and determine
girder elasticity 3. Convert elasticity to a stress distribution 4. Convert deflection to a stress distribution 5. Compare the two stress distributions 6. Determine the probability of failure and
Safety Index 5
![Page 6: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
TSING MA BRIDGE, HONG KONG
(Nye, 2013; Wikipedia, 2013; Yau, Chan, & Thambiratnam, 2013)
Opened: 1997 Span : 1377 m Sensors: 282 Cost: AUD 1B
6
![Page 7: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
TIMBER BEAM BRIDGES
Powers Creek, Armidale Span 9 m c. 1930 - 2010
Munsies Bridge, Gostwyck 6 Spans 10 m Opened 1938 7
![Page 8: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Timber bridge design (Dare, 1903)
8
![Page 9: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Modern design (RTA, 2007)
9
![Page 10: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
(Glencross-Grant, c. 1975)
Somerton bridge across the Peel river, Tamworth NSW (Ingall, 2008) 10
![Page 11: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Diagrammatic section through a degraded girder
11
Second moment of Area for a solid circular girder:
![Page 12: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Diagrammatic section through a degraded girder; after excessive loading
12
Second moment of Area for two contiguous girders of semi-circular cross-section:
And the ratio between the two conditions is:
![Page 13: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Typical girder, Load-v-Deflection curve
0 20 40 60 80 120
050
150
250
350
Deflection, d (m
App
lied
Load
, P (k
N
13
![Page 14: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Proof load test, 50% ultimate load
14
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
050
100
150
200
250
300
350
Deflection, d (mm)
App
lied
Load
, P (k
N)
Measured data 50% load regression 50% prediction limits
![Page 15: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Proof load test, 70% ultimate load
15
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
050
100
150
200
250
300
350
Deflection, d (mm)
App
lied
Load
, P (k
N)
Measured data 50% load regression 50% prediction limits
![Page 16: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Proof load test, 80% ultimate load
16
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
050
100
150
200
250
300
350
Deflection, d (mm)
App
lied
Load
, P (k
N)
Measured data 50% load regression 50% prediction limits
![Page 17: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Nominal maximum girder load
17
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
050
100
150
200
250
300
350
Deflection, d (mm)
App
lied
Load
, P (k
N)
<< Nominal maximum girder load
Ultimate load
![Page 18: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
SHM: Recording vehicle activity
(Moore, 2012) 18
![Page 19: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Daily vehicle activity
(Moore, 2009, 2012) 19
![Page 20: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Determine girder baseline MoE • Measure bridge:
– Span – Girder shape – Girder Diameters – Decking
• Weigh vehicle – Front axle mass – Rear axle mass
• Measure mid-span deflection of each girder
• Calculate MoE
(Moore, 2012)
(Moore, 2012)
![Page 21: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Traffic load distribution
0 1 2 3 4 5
020
040
060
080
0
Stress (MPa)
Freq
uenc
y (X
10
21
![Page 22: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Girder load tests
22
RTA, 1990
Wilkinson, 2008
![Page 23: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23 Data from 338 girders removed from service (Moore, 2012)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
![Page 24: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MPa
14 GPa >
![Page 25: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)36 GPa >
86 MPa
14 GPa >
![Page 26: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MPa
14 GPa >
Data AS 1720:2000/H2.1; 5th percentile
![Page 27: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MPa
14 GPa >
![Page 28: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Girder strength distribution
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0
0
0 . 0 5
0 . 1
0 . 1 5
0 . 2
0 . 2 5
Strength Magnitude (MPa)
Pro
babi
lity
Den
sity
← StrengthDistribution
28
![Page 29: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Traffic load and girder strength distributions
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0
0
0 . 0 5
0 . 1
0 . 1 5
0 . 2
0 . 2 5
Load & Strength Magnitude (MPa)
Pro
babi
lity
Den
sity ← LoadDistribution
← StrengthDistribution
29
![Page 30: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Failure region
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0
0
0 . 0 5
0 . 1
0 . 1 5
0 . 2
0 . 2 5
Load & Strength Magnitude (MPa)
Pro
babi
lity
Den
sity ← LoadDistribution
← StrengthDistribution
FailureRegion
30
![Page 31: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
0 50 100 150 200
020
040
060
080
0
Stress (MPa)
Freq
uenc
y (X
10
Applied stress G6-MU MoR
0 5 10 150.
000
0.00
20.
004
0.00
60.
008
0.01
0
Stress (MPa)
Freq
uenc
y (X
10
Applied stress G6-MU MoR
Failure region
Failure rate: 2 in107
Fmax = 11.6 MPa
Failure rate: 2 in 107; Safety Index = 5.1 31
![Page 32: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Probability of failure Safety Index
1 in 103 3.1
1 in 104 3.7
1 in 105 4.3
1 in 106 4.8
1 in 107 5.2
NORMSINV(probability) calculates the inverse of the normal cumulative distribution function
12
34
5
Probability of failure
Safe
ty In
dex
100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
![Page 33: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
0 1 2 3 4 5 60.
00.
20.
40.
60.
81.
0
Stress (MPa)
Freq
uenc
y (X
10
Applied stress G4-MU MoR
Failure region
Failure rate: 1157 in107
Fmax = 8.6 MPa
0 50 100 150 200
010
020
030
040
050
060
0
Stress (MPa)
Freq
uenc
y (X
10
Applied stress G4-MU MoR
Failure rate: 1157 in 107; Safety Index = 3.7 33
![Page 34: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Interpretation of Safety Index
• Total cost of system failure = cost of an individual failure x number of failures
• If the failure cost is small a higher failure rate can be tolerated
– In such a case a failure rate of 1 in 103 and a safety index of 3.1 is generally acceptable
• A high failure cost necessitates a low failure rate
– In this type of case a failure rate of 1 in 106 and a safety index of 4.8 or higher is expected
– To achieve a lower failure rate can require excessive design and construction costs
34
![Page 35: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Failure examples • Small increased deflection of a bridge
– Condition: Deflection may exceed design standard of 600:1 (No component is expected to break or deform)
– Limit state: 1 in 103; safety index > 3.1
• Large increase in deflection – Condition:
Structural strength in question (Components may break or deform)
– Limit state: 1 in 106; safety index > 4.8
35
![Page 36: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
< 14 GPa
Jarrah
Radiata Pine
Tallowwood
Ironbark
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
![Page 37: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Tabulated MoR and MoE data
37 (Bolza & Kloot, 1963, p. 54)
![Page 38: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
Excised samples174 Species of timber (CSIRO)
Radiata Pine
Ironbark
![Page 39: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Clustering – Ironbark girders
• Condition State 1. No decay, CS-1 2. Minor decay, CS-2 3. Medium decay, CS-3 4. Advanced deterioration, CS-4
• Failure mode 1. Mid-span bending failure, FM-1 2. Non mid-span bending failure, FM-2
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MPa
14 GPa >
![Page 40: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
Ironbark Girders Ironbark Girders
![Page 41: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
Ironbark Girders, CS-1, FM-1
![Page 42: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
1
Mean Ironbark,CS-1,FM-1 Mean Ironbark,CS-1,FM-1
![Page 43: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
12
1 IB,CS-1,FM-1 2 IB,CS-2,FM-1
![Page 44: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
1 IB,CS-1,FM-1 2 IB,CS-2,FM-1 3 IB,CS-2,FM-2
123
![Page 45: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
123
41 IB,CS-1,FM-1 2 IB,CS-2,FM-1 3 IB,CS-2,FM-2 4 IB,CS-3&4,FM-2
![Page 46: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
123
4
Ironbark
1 IB,CS-1,FM-1 2 IB,CS-2,FM-1 3 IB,CS-2,FM-2 4 IB,CS-3&4,FM-2
![Page 47: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
2A, 15 years 2B, 45 years
123
4
Ironbark
2A
2B
![Page 48: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and · PDF fileStructural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Timber Beams and Girders . Presentation for: FWPA, 2 April 2014 . Dr John C](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020302/5abb498e7f8b9a297f8cb2f3/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS • Girder MoE and MoR can be experimentally
determined
• Probability of failure can be calculated
• A bridge safety limit can be continuously quantified using a SHM system
48 0 10 20 30 40 50
050
100
150
200
MoE (GPa)
MoR
(MPa
)
86 MP
14 GPa >
2A, 15 years 2B, 45 years
123
4
Ironbark
2A
2B