strategy formulation

60
1 STRATEGY FORMULATION At the end of this module the learning outcomes are • The concept of SBU and its importance • Models of portfolio analysis • Various types of generic strategies • Influence of market position on strategy • Ways to attack and defend organizations

Upload: maya

Post on 07-Jan-2016

61 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

STRATEGY FORMULATION. At the end of this module the learning outcomes are The concept of SBU and its importance Models of portfolio analysis Various types of generic strategies Influence of market position on strategy Ways to attack and defend organizations. STRATEGY FORMULATION. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: STRATEGY FORMULATION

1

STRATEGY FORMULATION

At the end of this module the learning outcomes are

• The concept of SBU and its importance• Models of portfolio analysis• Various types of generic strategies• Influence of market position on strategy• Ways to attack and defend organizations

Page 2: STRATEGY FORMULATION

2

STRATEGY FORMULATION

Suggested readings

1. Strategic Marketing Management

by Pearson & Gilligan, Chapter 9 & 10

2. Strategic marketing

by Cravens, Chapter 10

Page 3: STRATEGY FORMULATION

3

STRATEGY FORMULATION

1. Concept of SBU – Strategic business units- Historically, companies followed a division

orientation. Problems were:• Closely related products were coming under

separate division• Each division dealt differently• Similar products getting different treatment• Dissimilar products getting identical treatment• Sub-optimal results

Page 4: STRATEGY FORMULATION

4

STRATEGY FORMULATION

SBU means- Dividing companies into six division’s is not six

different businesses- It may be only four businesses- A multi-business corporation groups its

businesses into a few distinct strategic business units

- Every SBU• Own set of competitors• Own distinct strategies

 

Page 5: STRATEGY FORMULATION

5

STRATEGY FORMULATIONExample – SBUHMT

- PSU

- 24 division’s, 16 production units, 35000 employees

- Large basket of products- machine tools, tractors, flexible-manufacturing systems, tractors, printing machines, lamps, watches, dairy machinery.

- World bank recommended

Four business groups

• Machine tools

• Watches

• Lamps

• Agricultural machinery

Page 6: STRATEGY FORMULATION

6

STRATEGY FORMULATIONProblems with World Bank guidelines- Each business group

• Vastly different market and technology attributes

E.g: Machine tools included printing press and other general industrial machinery

SBU concept

- Five SBUs

• Machine tools

• Consumer products

• Tractors

• Engineering components & industrial machinery.

• Technology and information

Page 7: STRATEGY FORMULATION

7

STRATEGY FORMULATIONSBU characteristics- Is a single business or a collection of related

businesses, which offer scope for independent planning.

- Own set of competitors- Has a manager who has responsibility for strategic

planning and profit performance- Is saleable

E.g.: passenger cars and commercial vehicles are different SBUs

Mergers and acquisitions of SBU’s and not companies.

Page 8: STRATEGY FORMULATION

8

STRATEGY FORMULATION

BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP (BCG)- Balanced portfolio of SBU’s- Good portfolio

• Dominance of cash cows and stars- Unbalanced portfolio

1. Dogs and question marks dominate

2. Insufficient cash

 

Page 9: STRATEGY FORMULATION

9

STRATEGY FORMULATION

Example: RaymondSBU’s

1. Textiles – Star

2. Cement – Problem child

3. Steel – Dog- Raymond divested cement business- Focus on textiles.

Why Raymond divested cement?

Page 10: STRATEGY FORMULATION

10

STRATEGY FORMULATIONISSUES WITH BCG MODEL- Why was Captain Cook brand sold by DCW to International

Bestfoods?

- Was models a criteria

- Too much emphasis on market-share and market growth

- What do you do when portfolios are border cases

- Over simplified

- Are the two parameters enough to judge business

- What about environmental factors

- Return on investment

- Where are strategic issues accommodated?

Page 11: STRATEGY FORMULATION

11

STRATEGY FORMULATION

STRATEGY FORMULATION- Michael Porter’s contribution- Three generic strategies

1. Cost leadership

2. Differentiation

3. Focus

Page 12: STRATEGY FORMULATION

12

STRATEGY FORMULATION

COST LEADERSHIP• Bajaj Auto-scooters- Maruti-cars

• Zen- Cost minimizations- Japan in 60’s

1. Lowest cost producer

2. Later Taiwan and Korea lower cost producers

3. Moved to differentiation

4. Success due to quality management

Page 13: STRATEGY FORMULATION

13

STRATEGY FORMULATION

DIFFERENTIATION- Mercedes- Sony

1. Creating unique image

2. Branding- Singapore Airlines

1. Superior inflight services

2. Most modern fleet

3. Excellent ground services

Customers willing to pay more

Page 14: STRATEGY FORMULATION

14

STRATEGY FORMULATION

FOCUS- Narrow segment - Specialist reputation

• Dilip Chhabria designer cars• Laura Ashley

- Respond quickly to requirements- Small firms

Page 15: STRATEGY FORMULATION

15

STRATEGY FORMULATIONISSUES WITH PORTER’S GENERIC STRATEGIES- Pursue one or more strategies simultaneously

- Low cost does not mean low prices

- E.g.: Boeing

• Low cost

• Sells on quality service

- E.g.: IBM

• Large producer – keeps costs low

• Sells on image

• Higher prices

- E.g.: Dilip Chhabria

• Focus

• Differentiation

Page 16: STRATEGY FORMULATION

16

STRATEGY FORMULATION

INFLUENCE OF MARKET POSITION ON STRATEGY

• Market leader• Market challengers and followers• Market nichers

Page 17: STRATEGY FORMULATION

17

STRATEGY FORMULATION

1. MARKET LEADER- Largest market share- By virtue of

• Pricing• Advertising intensity• Distribution coverage• Rate of new product introduction

- Dominant player

E.g.: Intel, Asian paints, HLL in detergents

Page 18: STRATEGY FORMULATION

18

STRATEGY FORMULATION

2 MARKET CHALLENGERS AND FOLLOWERS- Firms with lesser market share

• Aggressive and attack market leader• Dominate (market challengers)• Less aggressive (market followers)

- Market challenger• Pepsi, Procter and Gamble in India.

- Market followers• Campa, Fena

Page 19: STRATEGY FORMULATION

19

STRATEGY FORMULATION

3 MARKET NICHERS- Small firms- Niche markets- Too small of interest to big firms- Avoid expensive head on fights with larger

companies

E.g.: Dilip Chhabria, Ritu Beri designer wear.

Page 20: STRATEGY FORMULATION

20

STRATEGY FORMULATION

MARKET LEADER STRATEGIES• Need to defend• Various methods

1. Expansion of markets

2. Protect market share

3. Increase market share• Which is most beneficial

• Expansion of markets

Page 21: STRATEGY FORMULATION

21

STRATEGY FORMULATION

1. EXPANSION OF MARKETS

Identifying new users• New users

- Intel in India• Educating end-users about computers use

in schools- Cadbury in India

• Repositioning• Included adults

Page 22: STRATEGY FORMULATION

22

STRATEGY FORMULATION

- New uses• Dupont

- First used for parachutes- Now

• Stockings• Shirts• Tyres

Page 23: STRATEGY FORMULATION

23

STRATEGY FORMULATION

Existing users increasing their usage rates

Procter and Gamble• Shampoos

Air –Tel- Value added services

• Florist• Share prices

Page 24: STRATEGY FORMULATION

24

STRATEGY FORMULATION2. Protect market shareVulnerable to attack

- E.g.: American cars in 60’s and 70’s• Ignored small car market.• Japanese developed this market.• Oil shock in 70’s• Fuel efficient cars• Increased market share• Setback for GM / Ford• Joint venture with Japanese

- Ford with Mazda- Chyrsler with Mitsubishi- GM taking over Daewoo

Page 25: STRATEGY FORMULATION

25

STRATEGY FORMULATION

Modi Xerox(MX)• HCL attacked• MX focused on service• Improved its after sales service network• HCL gave up.

Page 26: STRATEGY FORMULATION

26

STRATEGY FORMULATION

3. Expanding market share

Asian Paints- Consistently proactive strategy- Innovation- Intensive advertising- Improved distribution-direct deal with retail- Price incentives- Smaller size products.

Page 27: STRATEGY FORMULATION

27

STRATEGY FORMULATION

MILITARY ANALOGIES FOR MARKET LEADERS

• Position defence• Mobile defence• Flanking defence• Contraction defence• Pre-emptive defence• Counter-offensive defence

Page 28: STRATEGY FORMULATION

28

STRATEGY FORMULATION

POSITION DEFENCE• Impregnability of a fixed position• Not very successful• Attackers use indirect approach rather than

taking head-on approach• Maruti’s rapid loss of market share in late

90’s• Unable to defend the attack of Hyundai

Page 29: STRATEGY FORMULATION

29

STRATEGY FORMULATION

MOBILE DEFENCE

• Focus on understanding ‘marketing myopia’

• Broadening and diversification of business

• Build future defences– Surf gearing for launch of Ariel– ITC movement into non-tobacco businesses

Page 30: STRATEGY FORMULATION

30

STRATEGY FORMULATION

FLANKING DEFENCE

• Less protected than other parts

• Vulnerable to attacks

• Secondary markets should not be ignored

Page 31: STRATEGY FORMULATION

31

STRATEGY FORMULATION

FLANKING DEFENCE

Coke

• Cola main business

• Non-cola areas are vulnerable to attacks

• Juices

• Launch of Minute-Maid to protect flanks

Page 32: STRATEGY FORMULATION

32

STRATEGY FORMULATION

CONTRACTION DEFENCE

• Faced with attack

• Companies realize it is not worthwhile to defend

• Retreat

• Concentrate where it is least vulnerable

Page 33: STRATEGY FORMULATION

33

STRATEGY FORMULATION

CONTRACTION DEFENCE

IBM• Focused on PC hardware in 80’s• Entry of low-cost manufacturers• Unable to match costs• Gradual retreat • Focus on software services

Failure of British mobike companies

Page 34: STRATEGY FORMULATION

34

STRATEGY FORMULATION

PRE-EMPTIVE DEFENCE

• Limitations of contraction and position defence

• Pre-emptive strikes

• Decimate competitor

• Labeled as FUD marketing -that is spreading ‘fear uncertainty and despair

Page 35: STRATEGY FORMULATION

35

STRATEGY FORMULATION

PRE-EMPTIVE DEFENCE

HUL experience• Launch of broad range of products• Counter competition• Anticipation

Surf– Launch of variants

– Pre-empt P & G

Page 36: STRATEGY FORMULATION

36

STRATEGY FORMULATION

COUNTER OFFENSIVE DEFENCE

• Once attack has taken place

• How to respond to attack of competitor

• Three forms• meet the attack head-on

• Attack the attacker’s flank

• Develop a pincer’s movement in an attempt to cut off the attacker’s operational base.

Page 37: STRATEGY FORMULATION

37

STRATEGY FORMULATION

• Attack head-on is the most common

• Attack at the weak areas of attacker is the second way of doing it.

• Fighting by hitting at the attacker’s base is the counter-offensive

Jet responding to Sahara price war

Page 38: STRATEGY FORMULATION

38

STRATEGY FORMULATION

MARKET CHALLENGERS STRATEGIES- Not market leaders

- Challenge market leaders

• Try to achieve leadership

• Look at weaknesses of leaders

- Issues

• Cost of attacking

• Likelihood of success

Page 39: STRATEGY FORMULATION

39

STRATEGY FORMULATION

• Challenger needs to look into• Sustainable competitive advantage

• Neutralize leader’s advantage

• Create impediments for leaders to retaliate

Page 40: STRATEGY FORMULATION

40

STRATEGY FORMULATION Michelin’s entry in US market

• Early 70’s

- U.S. players leaders

- Use of non-radial tyres

- Supplied to car manufacturers

- Michelin

• Leader in radials

• Attacked replacement mkt.

• 1973, Arab –Israel war

• Oil shock

• Consumers preference for fuel efficient tyres

• Radial tyres more fuel efficient

Page 41: STRATEGY FORMULATION

41

STRATEGY FORMULATION

- Michelin attacked car manufacturers

- Gained market share

- U.S. players slow in reaction

Michelin became market leader at the expense of Goodyear, Goodrich.

Page 42: STRATEGY FORMULATION

42

STRATEGY FORMULATION

CHOICES

• Attack the market leader

• Attacking firms of similar sizes

• Attacking smaller regional firms

Page 43: STRATEGY FORMULATION

43

STRATEGY FORMULATION

Studies found that

• Attacking smaller regional firms proves to be most profitable

• Attacking market leader is a high risk high return strategy

Page 44: STRATEGY FORMULATION

44

STRATEGY FORMULATION

MARKET CHALLENGERS

In military analogy it can be– Frontal attack– Flanking attack– An encirclement attack– Bypass attack– Guerilla attack

Page 45: STRATEGY FORMULATION

45

STRATEGY FORMULATION

FRONTAL ATTACK

• Two types– Pure frontal attack– limited frontal attack

Page 46: STRATEGY FORMULATION

46

STRATEGY FORMULATION

Pure frontal attack

• market leader

• product for product

• price for price

• Xerox attacking Gestetner

Page 47: STRATEGY FORMULATION

47

STRATEGY FORMULATION

Limited frontal attack

• Attacking at selected customers

• Kingfisher attacking Jet

• Kingfisher class

Page 48: STRATEGY FORMULATION

48

STRATEGY FORMULATION

FLANK ATTACK

• Indirect approach

• More economical and effective

• Japanese mobike companies attacking European counterparts

• Hero Honda attacking Bajaj

Page 49: STRATEGY FORMULATION

49

STRATEGY FORMULATION

ENCIRCLEMENT ATTACK

• Attack on many fronts

• Defender’s ability to retaliate is considerably reduced

• Expensive strategy

• Short-term losses

Page 50: STRATEGY FORMULATION

50

STRATEGY FORMULATION

ENCIRCLEMENT ATTACKSEIKO watches• Multiple products• constant changes• Occupy many dealer outlets• Heavy advertising• Left many British and US watch companies in bad

shape• Attack from all fronts

Page 51: STRATEGY FORMULATION

51

STRATEGY FORMULATION

BYPASS ATTACK

• Avoid attacks against defender’s existing products

• Focus on unrelated products

Page 52: STRATEGY FORMULATION

52

STRATEGY FORMULATION

BYPASS ATTACK XEROX• Gestetner the undisputed leader of the duplicating market

in 70’s• Low cost technology• Xerox avoided this• Focus on building photocopiers• Superior finish and easy to use• Gestetner decline in mid-80’s• Consumers preference for faster copiersXerox the undisputed leader

Page 53: STRATEGY FORMULATION

53

STRATEGY FORMULATION

GUERILLA ATTACK

• series of hit-and-run moves

• Designed to demoralize the opponent

• Keep competitor off-balance

• Airtel offering free hand-sets with connection took MTNL/BSNL by surprise

Page 54: STRATEGY FORMULATION

54

STRATEGY FORMULATION

AIRTEL

• In 90s

• Offering free hand sets with connection

• Took market leaders MTNL/BSNL by surprise

• Gained significant market share

• Eventually leader

Page 55: STRATEGY FORMULATION

55

STRATEGY FORMULATIONMARKET FOLLOWER STRATEGIES- Not interested as leaders- Less proactive- Cost of leadership too high- Avoid confrontation

Page 56: STRATEGY FORMULATION

56

MARKET FOLLOWER STRATEGIES

Fena

• Market follower

• Follows the leader

• Does not have the resources to challenge the leader

Page 57: STRATEGY FORMULATION

57

STRATEGY FORMULATION

MARKET FOLLOWER STRATEGIES Followers need to decide• How they intend to operate• How they following a market leader• Three postures possible

• Following closely the leader• Following at a distance• Following selectively in product and market terms

Page 58: STRATEGY FORMULATION

58

STRATEGY FORMULATIONMARKET NICHER STRATEGIES- What is attractive

• Market size profitable• Growth potential• Negligible interest to major competitors• Resources to serve niche markets• Can defend when attacked.

E.g.: Avon mobike tyres.

Page 59: STRATEGY FORMULATION

59

STRATEGY FORMULATION

THE DANGERS OF STRATEGIC WEAR-OUT• Successful strategies• Began to wear out• Lose its impact• Strategies need review and modification

Kodak’s experience in conventional photography

Xerox looking at paperless offices

Page 60: STRATEGY FORMULATION

60

STRATEGY FORMULATIONWHAT EMERGES- Never ignore new competitors- Ignorance of Gestetner- UK mobike makers ignoring Japanese mobike makers- Always exploit competitive advantages

• Not disappear• Exploit new advantages

E.g.: Bajaj’s understanding of two-wheeler market.- Never launch new product without understanding

competitor’s response.