strategies for the international safe communities’ network study visit from china 1 june 2009 leif...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
Strategies for The International Safe
Communities’ Network
Study visit from China 1 June 2009
Leif Svanström
World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre on Community Safety Promotion
Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
The International Safe Communities’ Network
The Safe Community movement has its roots in Sweden and the local injury-prevention
programmes, such as in Falköping, Lidköping and Motala, developed during the 1970s and
1980s.
The first World Conference on Accident and Injury Prevention (Manifesto for Safe Communities 1989)
and the establishment of a WHO Collaborating Centre (on Community Safety
Promotion) at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm
The International Safe Communities’ Network
Injury surveillance results were crucial in the Falköping trial but less important in other
programs.
Activities involved different local government sectors as well as non- governmental
organizations organized in task force groups.
Safety PromotionSectorLevel
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
International
National
Community
Organisation
Group
Individual
Community Safety Promotion Community Safety Promotion
The International Safe Communities’ Network
In the beginning the community programs were focusing on non-intentional injuries, but towards the end of 1980’s intentional injuries or rather violence
and crime prevention became more focused.
Self-inflicted injuries or prevention of suicide attempts has later been included in some
communities.
The International Safe Communities’ Network
The World Health Organization (WHO) has since long launched a Global Program on
Injury Prevention. This program has showed its interest for specific sectors with high toll on human life, like traffic (World Health Day
2004).
Another approach is “World Report on Violence and Health” where is stated that
each year over 1.6 million lives are lost due to violence.
Global Road Traffic Injury Mortality
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
© WHO 2002. All rights reserved
No data
29.2–34.5
18.9–29.1
16.2–18.8
11.2–16.1
Mortality rate (per 100 000)
Road traffic injury mortality rates (per 100 000 population) in WHO regions, 2000
Africa Americas South-East Asia EuropeEastern
MediterraneanWestern Pacific
LMIC HIC LMIC India Other LMIC HIC LMIC HIC LMIC HIC China Other LMIC26.3 15.0 18.1 29.2 26.6 11.2 16.1 34.1 18.7 15.8 18.9 14.2
HIC, High-income countries; LMIC, Low- and middle-income countries.
Global Fire-related Burn Mortality
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
© WHO 2002. All rights reserved
No data
4.81–8.30
4.01–4.80
1.18–4.00
1.00–1.17
Mortality rate (per 100 000)
Fire-related burn mortality rates (per 100 000 population) in WHO regions, 2000
Africa Americas South-East Asia EuropeEastern
MediterraneanWestern Pacific
LMIC HIC LMIC India Other LMIC HIC LMIC HIC LMIC HIC China Other LMIC5.5 1.3 1.17 8.3 8.2 1.0 4.0 1.5 4.8 1.5 1.1 2.0
HIC, High-income countries; LMIC, Low- and middle-income countries.
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
© WHO 2002. All rights reserved
Global Drowning Mortality
No data
9.3–13.1
5.0–9.2
1.9–4.9
1.0–1.8
Mortality rate (per 100 000)
Drowning mortality rates (per 100 000 population) in WHO regions, 2000
Africa Americas South-East Asia EuropeEastern
MediterraneanWestern Pacific
LMIC HIC LMIC India Other LMIC HIC LMIC HIC LMIC HIC China Other LMIC13.1 1.3 4.3 7.6 3.8 1.0 9.2 1.8 4.2 4.0 12.3 4.9
HIC, High-income countries; LMIC, Low- and middle-income countries.
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
© WHO 2002. All rights reserved
Global Interpersonal Violence Mortality
No data
15.4–27.3
6.2–15.3
2.9–6.1
1.0–2.8
Mortality rate (per 100 000)
Interpersonal violence mortality rates (per 100 000 population) in WHO regions, 2000
Africa Americas South-East Asia EuropeEastern
MediterraneanWestern Pacific
LMIC HIC LMIC India Other LMIC HIC LMIC HIC LMIC HIC China Other LMIC18.1 6.1 27.3 6.2 2.9 1.0 15.4 4.1 6.3 1.1 2.3 13.4
HIC, High-income countries; LMIC, Low- and middle-income countries.
The International Safe Communities’ Network
“Safety – A Universal Concern and Responsibility for All
Equity‘All human beings have an equal right to health and safety’
National and international participation
‘As part of its national health plan, each government should formulate a national policy and a plan of action to create and
sustain safe communities. All national health authorities urgently need to develop national safety goals and plans to achieve these
goals.
The International Safe Communities’ Network
Recommendation for Action
1. Formulate Public Policy for Safety
2. Create supportive Environments
3. Strengthen Community Action
4. Broaden Public services
The International Safe Communities’ Network
Strategies for The Safe Communities’ Network:
1. Dissemination of “success stories”.
2. Establishment of a network of demonstration communities – good
examples to others.).
Hong Kong1. Kwai Tsing2. Sham Shui
Po3. Tai Po4. Tsuen Wan5. Tuen Mun6. Tung
Chung7. Zhongzheng
Canada1. Brampton2. Brockville3. Calgary4. Rainy River Valley5. Sault Ste. Marie6. Wood Buffalo
Vietnam1.Da Trach2.Dong Tien3.Lang Co4.Loc Sonh5.Xuan Dinh6. Duc Chinh7. Hoa Long8. Cam Thuy
Australia1.Denmark2.Hume City3.Latrobe4.Mackay/Whitsunday5.Melbourne6.Noarlunga7.Northcott8.Palmerston9.Ryde10.SHOROC11.Townsville12.Mount Isa13.Cairns
AustriaState of Vorarlberg
Bosnia and HerzegovinaKonjic
ChilePeñaflor
IsraelRaanana
China (Province of Taiwan)
1. Alishan2. Dungshr3. Fongbin4. Neihu5. Shoufeng6. Shihkang
Czech RepublicKromeriz
DenmarkHorsens
EstoniaRapla
Finland1.Hyvinkää2.Kouvola
Iran1.Arsanjan2.Bardaskan3.Kashmar
JapanKameoka
Korea1.Jeju2.Songpa3.Suwon
South Africa1.Eldorado Park2.Nomzamo–Broadlands Park
New Zealand1. Christchurch2. New
Plymouth3. North Shore4. Porirua5. Tauranga6. Waimakariri7. Waitakere8. Wellington9. Whangarei
USA1.Dallas2.Anchorage3.Omaha4.Springfield
PeruSan Borja (Lima) Sp.
PolandTarnowskie GóryThe
NetherlandsRotterdam
Sweden1.Arjeplog2.Borås3.Falköping4.Falun5.Katrineholm6.Krokom7.Lidköping8.Ludvika9.Mariestad10.Motala11.Nacka12.Skövde13.Smedjebacken 14.Staffanstorp15.Tidaholm16.Töreboda17.Uddevalla
Republic of SerbiaBacki Petrovac
Norway1.Alvdal2.Årdal3.Bergen4.Fredrikstad5.Harstad6.Høyanger 7.Klepp 8.Kvam9.Larvik10.Os11.Rakkestad12.Ski13.Sogn and Fjordane14.Spydeberg15.Stovner16.Trondheim17.Vågå
China1.Hong'qiao2.Huamu3.Jianwai Community4.Jing Ge Zhuang, Kailuan5.Jing’an6.Kangjian 7.Lu´an Community8.Maizidian 9.Qianjiaying, Kailuan 10.Wangjing11.Xicheng District, Beijing12.Yayuncun13.Youth Park Community14.Yuetan, Beijing
Avril 2009
Communautés de démonstration
En total: 127/152 en 26 paises5 and more
1-4
China (Province of Taiwan)
1. Alishan2. Dungshr3. Fongbin4. Neihu5. Shoufeng6. Shihkang
The International Safe Communities’ Network
Strategies for The Safe Communities’ Network(1a):
3. In order to get help in this process s.c. Affiliate Safe Community Support Centres has been linked to the
Network – spread all over the World’s regions.
Sweden•Swedish Association for Safe Communities (SCCC)
Czech RebublicCentre for Injury Prevention (ASCSC)
South Africa•University of South Africa, Institute for Social and Health Sciences (ASCSC)•Centre for Peace Action (SCCC)
Canada• Safe Communities Foundation (ASCSC) (SCCC)
USA• National Safety Council (ASCSC)• Peaceful Resources Center (ASCSC)• Injury Prevention Research Center (ASCSC)
Colombia• Instituto CISALVA (SCCC)
China, Hong Kong• Occupational Safety and Health Council (ASCSC)
Korea• Center for Injury Prevention and Community Safety Promotion (ASCSC) (SCCC)
Bangladesh• Centre for Injury Prevention and Research(ASCSC)
Australia• Royal Children´s Hospital Safety Centre (ASCSC)• Austrailian Safe Communities Foundation (SCCC)
New Zealand• Safe Communities Foundation (ASCSC) (SCCC)
The “Affiliate Safe Community Support Centres (ASCSC)” and the “Safe Community Certifying Centres (SCCC)”
Uganda.The Injury Control center
The International Safe Communities’ Network
Strategies for The Safe Communities’ Network(2):
4. Since 1991 yearly international conferences level has been organized and still are – the next one in
Colombia August 2009.5. Some leading countries establish national support
organizations for Safe Community development.6. Bilateral cooperation between international Safe
Communities is established.
The International Safe Communities’ Network
Strategies for The Safe Communities’ Network(3):
7. Production of teaching materials, text- books, training courses and internet-based information becomes more
and more important. (www.phs.ki.se/csp).
8. Special initiatives like Safe Schools etc. are launched.
The International Safe Communities’ Network
Indicators for International Safe Communities
Safe Communities have:
1. An infrastructure based on partnership and collaborations, governed by a cross-sectional group that is
responsible for safety promotion in their community;
2. Long-term, sustainable programs covering all ages, environments, and situations;
The International Safe Communities’ Network
Indicators for International Safe Communities (2)Safe Communities have:
3. Programs that target high-risk groups and environments,
and programs that promote safety for vulnerable groups;
4. Programs that document the frequency and causes of injuries;
The International Safe Communities’ Network
Indicators for International Safe Communities (3)
Safe Communities have:
5. Evaluation measures to assess their programs, processes and the effects of change;
6. Ongoing participation in national and international Safe Communities networks.
The International Safe Communities’ Network
www.phs.ki.se/csp