strategic risk factors in projects norwegian center for project management trondheim, sept 5, 2007...

27
Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Upload: alexander-mathews

Post on 12-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Strategic Risk Factors in Projects

Norwegian Center for Project Management

Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007

Risk Resolution

Page 2: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Black Swans in the World of Capital Projects

Risk Resolution

The Impact of the Highly ImprobableThe Impact of the Highly Improbable

Page 3: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Avoiding the Turkey Trap

Thanksgiving!!!

What is a “Black Swan”?What is a “Black Swan”?

• An outlier “outside the realm of regular An outlier “outside the realm of regular expectations”expectations”

• Carries extreme impactCarries extreme impact

• We concoct explanations to make it seem We concoct explanations to make it seem predictable once it has occurredpredictable once it has occurred

Risk Resolution

Page 4: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Hunting Black Swans

Risk Resolution

Page 5: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Examples of Black Swans in Capital Projects?

• What was the project?• What was the Black Swan risk? (i.e. “an

outlier outside the realm of regular expectations”)

• Why was it not expected or planned for?

Page 6: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Consider Kashagan (per WSJ 8/28/07)

• Shell operator for Exploration – logistics challenges etc.• 2001: Eni=operator, 1st Oil 2005 – lack of benchmarks for estimating• issue of artificial islands delays project• 2004: new plan approved, 1st Oil 2008, $10G• 2007: update: 1st Oil end 2010, $19G (Life $57G->$136G)

– LQ too close to treatment plant, weak $, lack of benchmarks, inflation– Cost of drilling rigs, “soaring steel prices”, lack of engineers, PMs– Kashagan: deny permits, project on hold, fire Eni

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RISK FACTORS:• Reservoir: H2S, pressure (“costly stress-resistant pipes”)• Location: Caspian freezes 5 mo./yr. (“rig-wrecking ice-packs”), cold

winter, logistics, 10’WD • No export pipeline• Environmental: beluga, sturgeon, seals (no spills!) – permitting issues• Partners: strong, misaligned, dsyfunctional• Kazakh government new at this …

Page 7: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Questions:

– LQ too close to treatment plant, weak $, lack of benchmarks, inflation

– Cost of drilling rigs, “soaring steel prices”, lack of engineers, PMsRISK FACTORS:• Reservoir: H2S, pressure (“costly stress-resistant pipes”)• Location: Caspian freezes 5 mo./yr. (“rig-wrecking ice-packs”), cold

winter, logistics, 10’WD • No export pipeline• Environmental: beluga, sturgeon, seals (no spills!) – permitting issues• Partners: strong, misaligned, dsyfunctional• Kazakh government new at this …

• Were these really Black Swan risks?– Could they have been predicted?– If so, why weren’t they?

• If you were the Kazakhs, would you fire Eni? If so, why? If not, why not?

Page 8: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

The Industry Today

• Poor project performance is not acceptable when capital markets are looking for predictability & strong returns

• >50% of execs are dissatisfied with project performance (eg 40% of projects overrun) – more-so than ever

• … cannot afford to miscalculate capital project risks – yet do not have a good grasp of how to manage (them)

Source: Capital Project Execution in the Oil & Gas Industry – Booz Allen Hamilton

Risk Resolution

Page 9: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Trends in Capital Project Investment & Complexity

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

CA

PE

X I

nv

es

tme

nt

Ind

ex

Majors - CAPEX Plan Majors - Escal. Adjusted Independents - CAPEX Plan Indep. - Escal. Adjusted

Sources of data:Majors: COP, CVX, RDSIndependents: DVN, APCEscalation adjustments per CERA "Upstream Capital Cost Index"

Projects in 2007 portfolio characterized by more hostile locations, higher levels of technology (eg for ultra deep-water, deep oil sands, alternative energy), longer time to first oil, empowered NOC partners seeking greater control, and non-OECD locations.

CAGR = 37.5%

CAGR = 35.5%

Risk Resolution

Page 10: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Is Escalation the Culprit?

180

2002 200880

170

2000 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

CostIndex

(2000=100)

160

150

140

130

120

110

100

90

Q3–2006:167

Q1–2006:148

Q3–2005:126

Risk Resolution

Page 11: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

A Look Outside Our Industry

• Mega-project performance has historically been poor

• Consider Infrastructure Projects– Cost overruns of 50 – 100% are common– Main causes1:

• Underestimated (“appraisal optimism”)• Risk analysis assumes “everything goes according to

plan” • “Delusion” is often necessary for projects to proceed

• How do these conclusions compare with oil & gas megaprojects?

1:“Megaprojects & Risks” – Bent Flybjerg

Risk Resolution

Page 12: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

So What is the Problem Here?

A. Lack of “Front – End Loading”?B. Ineffective organization?C. Management does not want to hear bad

news?D. Outdated approach to Capital Project Risk

Management?E. ALL of the above?

Page 13: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

CAPEX Predictability Requires A New Approach

1990 2000 2010

Av

era

ge

pro

jec

t s

ize

, ri

sk

& c

om

ple

xit

y

HAVE: Conventional HAVE: Conventional Project ManagementProject Management

PROJECT MANAGER & TEAM

NEED: Strategic NEED: Strategic

Risk ManagementRisk Management EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT

today

Risk Resolution Copyright Westney Consulting Group Inc.

Page 14: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

How Can We Improve?

A. Lack of “Front – End Loading”?– We have stage-gate processes – do we use them?– Are they “facilities - centric” or do they provide

cross – functional integration?– Are they used consistently – with discipline?

Page 15: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Capital Project Estimating Techniques

Risk Resolution

Page 16: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

How Can We Improve?

B. Ineffective organization?

How do project organizations need to change?

• New or different roles & responsibilities?

• New or different skills?

How do corporate organizations need to change?

• New or different roles & responsibilities?

• Stronger governance?

Page 17: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Enterprise Risk Management: The Risk-Driven Project Delivery System

CAPEX Portfolio Characteristics

CAPEX VaR™ Competency Requirements

The PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEM delivers each of the competencies The PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEM delivers each of the competencies required to predictably execute the project portfolio:required to predictably execute the project portfolio:

Peo

ple

Peo

ple

(ski

lls,

ava

ilab

ilit

y, e

ffec

tive

nes

s)(s

kill

s, a

vail

abil

ity,

eff

ecti

ven

ess)

ProcessProcess (methods, systems, tools)(methods, systems, tools)

Governance

Governance

Risk Resolution Copyright Westney Consulting Group Inc.

Page 18: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

How Can We Improve?

C. Management does not want to hear bad news?

How does management’s view of projects and project teams need to change?

Page 19: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Managing Risks at the Right Level

Risk Tactical Strategic

Au

thori

ty /

A

ccou

nta

bilit

y

PM

TM

anag

emen

t

e.g.:

• Political

• Global economic trends

• Partner / NOC issues

• Organizational alignment

e.g.:

• Project definition

• Contractor performance

• Pricing

• Logistics

e.g.:

• Unmitigated strategic risks become tactical problems for PMT

e.g.:

• Management intervention in PMT tactics leads to internally driven risks

Govern

an

ce

Risk Resolution

Page 20: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

So What is the Problem Here?

D. Outdated approach to Capital Project Risk Management?

Page 21: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

All Risks Must Be Considered

+

Risk Exposure

Risk-Conditioned Investment

Valuesm

Background Risks

Enterprise Risks +

Definition Risks

Performance Risks+ Estimate (incl.

Contingency)

Risk Resolution Copyright Westney Consulting Group Inc.

Page 22: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Strategic vs. Tactical Risks

Risk Resolution

STRATEGIC RISKS (outliers; managed at the executive level)

Background Risks

External outliers e.g., External outliers e.g., SCOPE-related: SCOPE-related: new or unproven new or unproven technology, edge of experience” technology, edge of experience” engineering solutions, prototype engineering solutions, prototype componentscomponentsMARKET-related: MARKET-related: extreme market extreme market conditions & trends, conditions & trends, LOCATIONLOCATION – – related:related: undefined site undefined site conditions, uncertain government conditions, uncertain government regulations & requirementsregulations & requirementsCOMMERCIAL – COMMERCIAL – related:related: business deal business deal issues, partner relationship risksissues, partner relationship risks

Definition Risks

Risks associated with the degree of Risks associated with the degree of technical and planning definitiontechnical and planning definition

TACTICAL RISKS (ranged around the deterministic estimate & schedule; managed at the project level)

Enterprise Risks

Internal outliers e.g., Internal outliers e.g., RESOURCE-related: RESOURCE-related: lack of project lack of project engineering and management resources engineering and management resources with requisite skills and experiencewith requisite skills and experienceGOVERNANCE-related: GOVERNANCE-related: inefficient of inefficient of misguided governance modelmisguided governance modelPROCESS-relatedPROCESS-related: inadequate or : inadequate or inappropriate project development and inappropriate project development and execution work processesexecution work processes

Performance Risks

Risks associated with owner and Risks associated with owner and contractor performance contractor performance

Copyright Westney Consulting Group Inc.

Page 23: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Risk Framing - Improving VOI for Executive Decision-Making

Risk Discovery

Risk Analysis

Decision Parameters

Risk Management

Risk Taxonomy

Performance Benchmarks

Risk Scenarios

Project Risk Indicative Modeling System™

Risk- Conditioned Investment

Value™

Risk Frames

Risk Strategies

““The goal of forecasting is not to predict the future but to tell you The goal of forecasting is not to predict the future but to tell you what you need to know to take meaningful action in the present” what you need to know to take meaningful action in the present”

Paul Saffo, HBR, July-Aug 2007Paul Saffo, HBR, July-Aug 2007“VOI”=Value of Information

Business Resilience

Decision Process

Decision Support Methodology

(PRIMS™) (RCIV)

Copyright Westney Consulting Group Inc.Risk Resolution

Page 24: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Risk Framing Shapes Capital Project OutcomesRisk Framing Shapes Capital Project Outcomes

PotentialRisk

Exposure

*Risk-Conditioned Investment Value *Risk-Conditioned Investment Value TM TM

Preliminary RCIV*

TO

TA

L P

RO

JEC

T C

OS

TT

OT

AL

PR

OJE

CT

CO

ST

Risk Framing

The “First

Number”

RiskExposure

The Project Budget

including Contingency

Sanctioned RCIV*

CAPEX VaR™ CAPEX VaR™ for Portfolio for Portfolio ManagementManagement

Strategic Risk ActionsStrategic Risk Actions

Execution PhaseDevelopment Phase

(Feasibility -> Pre-FEED -> FEED)

Copyright Westney Consulting Group Inc.Risk Resolution

Page 25: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Operations – OPEX RiskFacilities – CAPEX Risk

Drilling – DRILLEX Risk

Risk Resolution

Managing All Project Risks

Subsurface –Reserves Risk

Business – NPV Risk

Page 26: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

Risk Management StrategiesRisk Management Strategies

Execution PhaseDevelopment Phase

(Feasibility -> Pre-FEED -> FEED)

Background Risks

Enterprise Risks

External Outliers: External Outliers: Scope, Market, Scope, Market, LocationLocation

Internal Outliers: Internal Outliers: Project Delivery Project Delivery System System EffectivenessEffectiveness

Definition Risks

Performance Risks

= f (technical & = f (technical & planning definition)planning definition)

= f (owner & contr. = f (owner & contr. performance)performance)

P.D.S. P.D.S. Health Health CheckCheck

Risk-Driven Risk-Driven Competency Competency

ModelModel

Leveraged Project OrganizationLeveraged Project Organization

(PMC / PMT / Owner’s Engineer)(PMC / PMT / Owner’s Engineer)

Value Value Improving Improving PracticesPractices

Stage-Gate Stage-Gate Process Process

RoadmapRoadmap

Project Project Readiness Readiness

ReviewReview

Risk-Risk-Driven Driven

Contract Contract PlanPlan

Risk Risk BrokeringBrokering

Business Resilience - Threat Surveillance & Business Resilience - Threat Surveillance & DashboardDashboard

Threat Threat Response Response

ModelModel

External External Threat Threat

AssessmentAssessment

Independent Independent Project ReviewsProject Reviews

Competency AssuranceCompetency Assurance

Non-Operator OversightNon-Operator Oversight

Strategic Strategic Program Program PlanningPlanning

Copyright Westney Consulting Group Inc.Risk Resolution

Page 27: Strategic Risk Factors in Projects Norwegian Center for Project Management Trondheim, Sept 5, 2007 Risk Resolution

A Closing Thought ...

One of the best lessons children learn through video games is that standing still will get them killed quicker than anything else.

Jinx Milea, USC

Risk Resolution