stochastic geometry in nature: fractals and multifractals...
TRANSCRIPT
Stochastic geometry in nature: Stochastic geometry in nature: fractals and multifractals and how to study themfractals and multifractals and how to study them
Il A G bIlya A. GruzbergUniversity of Chicago
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Random shapes in nature: growth patternsRandom shapes in nature: growth patterns
• Hele-Shaw flow
• Real patterns in nature:
Hele Shaw flow• Mineral dendrites• ElectrodepositionElectrodeposition
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Random shapes in nature: thin filmsRandom shapes in nature: thin films
• AFM image of WO thin film3
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Random shapes in nature: thin filmsRandom shapes in nature: thin films
• Height clusters and isolines
• Positive heights in color,negative heights black
• Boundaries of positive height clusters
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
negative heights black height clusters
Random shapes in nature: turbulenceRandom shapes in nature: turbulence
• Inverse cascade in 2D Navier-Stokes turbulence
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.5
0
0.1
0.2
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2
• Vorticity clusters
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2
• Zero vorticity lines
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Vorticity clusters Zero vorticity lines
Random shapes in nature: turbulenceRandom shapes in nature: turbulence• Surface quasigeostrophic (atmospheric) turbulence
(a)
x0 x∞
• Temperature clusters • Temperature isolines
Th h bl l ti l t
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
• These shapes resemble percolation clusters
Random shapes in 2DRandom shapes in 2D
• Two classes:
• Critical clusters in equilibrium statistical mechanics
Local Boltzmann weights or probabilities
• Non-equilibrium growth patterns
• Similar complexity but very different understanding
Non-local, history-dependent rules
• Similar complexity but very different understanding
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Critical clustersCritical clusters
• Percolation clusters (site percolation)
Every site is either ON (black) with probabilityEvery site is either ON (black) with probabilityor OFF (white) with probability
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Critical clustersCritical clusters
• Larger critical percolation clusters
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Critical clustersCritical clusters
• Ising spin clusters
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Other equilibrium clustersOther equilibrium clusters
• q-states Potts model: q = 2 – Ising, q = 1 – percolation
• Can continue
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Other equilibrium clustersOther equilibrium clusters
• O(n) loop models: ( ) pn = 0 – self-avoiding walks (polymers)
• Can continue
• Solid-on-solid (SOS) models, roughening transitions,( ) , g g ,dimers, random tilings,…
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
DLA appletDLA applet
• Show DLA applet from S ow app et o
http://apricot.polyu.edu.hk/~lam/dla/dla.html
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
DLA appletDLA applet
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Growth patternsGrowth patterns
• Diffusion-limited aggregation T. Witten, L. Sander, 1981
• Many different variants
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
• Many different variants
Viscous fingering vs. DLAViscous fingering vs. DLA
O. Praud and H. L. Swinney, 2005
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Random shapes: stochastic geometryRandom shapes: stochastic geometry
• Fractal properties
• Multifractal spectrum of harmonic measure
• Crossing probability
• Left vs. right passage probabilityLeft vs. right passage probability
• Many more …
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Stochastic geometry: fractal propertiesStochastic geometry: fractal properties
• Fractal properties B. Mandelbrot, 1967
• Dimensions (critical exponents)
• Correlation functions
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Stochastic geometry: fractal propertiesStochastic geometry: fractal properties
• Subsets and boundaries with different fractal dimensions
Backbone, danglingends, minimal path
Hull and externalperimeter
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
e ds, a pat pe ete
Stochastic geometry: multifractal exponentsStochastic geometry: multifractal exponents
• Lumpy charge distribution on a cluster boundary
• Cover the curve by small discsof radius
• Charges (probabilities) inside discs
• Moments
• Non-linear is the hallmark of a multifractal
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Harmonic measure on DLA clusterHarmonic measure on DLA cluster
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Stochastic geometry: multifractal exponentsStochastic geometry: multifractal exponents• Multifractal measures: electric field of a charged cluster
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
2D critical phenomena2D critical phenomena• Scale invariance L.Kadanoff, A. Patashinski, V. Pokrovsky, 1966
Critical fluctuations (clusters) are self-similar at all scalesThe basis for renormalization group approach
• Conformal invariance A. Polyakov, 1970
• In 2D conformal maps = analytic functions
0.4
0.5
3
−0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
−1
0
1
2
−0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6
−0.5
−0.4
−0.3
−0.2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5
−3
−2
−1
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
2D critical stat mech models2D critical stat mech models
• Traditional approach: A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, A. Zamolodchikov, 1984
Conformal field theory: correlations of local observablesImportant parameter: central charge
• New focus:
Stochastic geometry: non local structures clusterStochastic geometry: non-local structures – clusterboundaries, their fractal and global properties
Finite geometries: conformal invariance made precise
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Crossing probabilityCrossing probability• Crossing probabilities J. Cardy, 1992
Is there a left to right crossing of white hexagons?
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Crossing probabilityCrossing probability
And now?
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Cluster boundariesCluster boundaries
• Focus on one domain wall using certain boundary conditions
• Conformal invariance allows to consider systems in simple• Conformal invariance allows to consider systems in simple domains, e. g. upper half plane
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Exploration processExploration process
• Cluster boundary can be “grown” step-by-step
h i d i d b l l i• Each step is determined by local environment
?
• Description in terms of differential equations in continuum
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Exploration processExploration process
• Cluster boundary as a stochastic growth process: percolation
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Conformal mapsConformal maps
• Specify a 2D shape by a function that maps it to a simple shape
• Always possible by Riemann’s theorem
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Loewner equationLoewner equationC Loewner 1923
• Describes upper half plane with a cut along a curve
C. Loewner, 1923
pp p g
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Loewner equationLoewner equation
• Example:
• In general
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Loewner equation: sketch of derivationLoewner equation: sketch of derivation
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Loewner equationLoewner equation
• Properties of the trace are quite amazing:
• If is smooth, never intersects itself
• If is singular enough, may touch itself or the boundary at double points
,
or the boundary at double points
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
SLE postulatesSLE postulates
• Conformal invariance of the measure on curves
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Lattice models: domain Markov propertyLattice models: domain Markov property
b bb
c
b
c
a a
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
SLE postulatesSLE postulates
• Markov property and stationary increments
i d d f ( k ) d• independent from (Markov property) andhas the same distribution as
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
SchrammSchramm--Loewner evolutionLoewner evolution
• Conformal invariance leads uniquely to Loewner equation
O. Schramm, 1999
driven by a Brownian motion:
• Noise strength is an important parameter:
SLE generates conformally-invariant random curvesstatistically equivalent to critical cluster boundaries
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Properties of SLEProperties of SLES R hd d O S h 2001
• is a simple curve for
S. Rohde and O. Schramm, 2001V. Beffara, 2002
• touches boundary and itself for
• densely fills a 2D region for
γ γ(t ) (t ) KKt
t
densely fills a 2D region for
κκ κ< 40 < 4 < < 8 > 8
Kt
κκ κ< 40 < 4 < < 8 > 8
• Fractal dimension of is
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
SLE versus CFTSLE versus CFT
• Conjecture: SLE describes all critical 2D systems withM. Bauer and D. Bernard, 2002
R. Friedrich and W. Werner, 2002
• Relation between noise strength and central charge:
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
SLE versus CFTSLE versus CFT
• Duality
B. Duplantier, 2000
Duality
ForK
describes its perimeter
describes the traceγ(t ) Kt
describes its perimeter
• Example: percolation hull with
κ4 < < 8
Example: percolation hull withwhile external perimeter with
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
SLE versus CFT: examplesSLE versus CFT: examples
• Loop-erased random walk• Self-avoiding walk
• Crystal facets, dimers,level lines of Gaussian field
• Ising model spin clusters
level lines of Gaussian field
• Percolation hull• Ising model FK clusters
• O(n) model and q states Potts models are related to SLE via
Percolation hull• Uniform spanning trees
• O(n) model and q-states Potts models are related to SLE via
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
A path in a uniform spanning tree: loop-erasedrandom walkrandom walk
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Self-avoiding walk
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Double domino tilings
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Level lines of Gaussian free field
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Boundary of a percolation cluster
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Random Peano curve
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Calculations with SLECalculations with SLE
• SLE as a Langevin equation
• Shift
• Simple way of deriving crossing probabilities various
• Langevin dynamics diffusion equation
• Simple way of deriving crossing probabilities, various critical exponents and scaling functions
• Multifractal spectra for critical clusters
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
p
Crossing probabilityCrossing probabilityJ. Cardy, 1992
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Crossing probabilityCrossing probability
C
L. Carleson
S. Smirnov, 2001
x
X
r “Most difficult theorem
A B1
r Most difficult theoremabout the identity function”
P. Jones
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
LeftLeft--passage probabilitypassage probability
• Take in the upper half plane
O. Schramm, 2001
• SLE trace passes to the left of with probability
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Conformal multifractalityConformal multifractality
B. Duplantier, 2000• Originally obtained by quantum gravity
• For critical clusters with central charge
• Generalization to include winding of curves I Binder 1998
• Can obtain from SLE, somewhat difficult…
Generalization to include winding of curves I. Binder, 1998B. Duplantier, I.Binder, 2002
• Can now obtain this and more using traditional CFTE. Bettelheim, I. Rushkin, IAG, and P. Wiegmann, 2005
A Belikov IAG I Rushkin 2008
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
A.Belikov,IAG, I.Rushkin, 2008
Variants and generalizations of SLEVariants and generalizations of SLE
• Different geometries: radial and others
• Radial SLE gives curves growing from the unit circleto the origin (or infinity):
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Variants and generalizations of SLEVariants and generalizations of SLE
• Multiple SLEJ. Cardy, 2003
M. Bauer, D. Bernard, K. Kytola, 2005
• Dyson Brownian motion (random matrices)• Dyson Brownian motion (random matrices)
• Calogero-Sutherland models
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Variants and generalizations of SLEVariants and generalizations of SLE
SLE f CFT i h i i d
E. Bettelheim, IAG, A.W.W. Ludwig and P. Wiegmann, 2005
• SLE for CFT with continuous symmetries and (Wess-Zumino models)
• SLE trace acquires “twisting” (a spin) described by an additional noise
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Variants and generalizations of SLEVariants and generalizations of SLE
• SLE driven by Lévy processes: branching growth
I. Rushkin, P. Oikonomou, L. P. Kadanoff and IAG, 2005
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Variants and generalizations of SLEVariants and generalizations of SLE
• SLE driven by Lévy processes: global properties
P. Oikonomou, I. Rushkin, IAG and L. P. Kadanoff, 2007
X (t ) » t 1=®; Y (t ) » A + B t 1¡ 1=®
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Applications of SLEApplications of SLE• 2D turbulence D. Bernard, G. Boffetta, A. Celani, G. Falkovich, 2006
• Zero vorticity contours are with · ¼ 5:9(percolation?)
0.06 (κ t)1/2 P(ξ(t))
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
< ξ(t)2 >
( t) P(ξ(t))
0.01
0.02
0.03
456789
<ξ(t)2>/t-3 -2 -1 0 321
ξ(t)/(κ t)1/2
00 0.005 0.01
t
4
0 0.005 0.01
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Applications of SLEApplications of SLE• 2D turbulence D. Bernard, G. Boffetta, A. Celani, G. Falkovich, 2006
•Temperature isolines are with · = 4 § 0:2(Gaussian free field?)
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Applications of SLEApplications of SLE
• 2D quantum chaosJ. P. Keating, J. Marklof, and I. G. Williams, 2006
E. Bogomolny, R. Dubertrand, C. Schmit, 2006
N d l li f h i f i i h• Nodal lines of chaotic wave functions are with (expect percolation ) · = 6· ¼ 5:3 (6:05; 5:92)
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Applications of SLEApplications of SLE• 2D Ising spin glass
C. Amoruso, A. K. Hartmann, M. B. Hastings, M. A. Moore, 2006D Bernard P Le Doussal A Middleton 2006D. Bernard, P. Le Doussal, A. Middleton, 2006
• Domain walls are with(somewhat disappointing: nothing special about this value)
· ¼ 2:1 (2:32 § 0:08)(somewhat disappointing: nothing special about this value)
4
0.05
L=W=400, R=50, F-APL=W=720, R=90, F-APL=W=720, R=360, F-APL=128, W=1024, R=64,
2
3
(2t)
-ξ2 (t
)]/t
L=256, from constrained endL=128, from constrained end200
3000
0.05
P(φ
)-P
2(φ)
L=128, W=1024, R=64,L-AP (fixed end)Pκ=2.24
(φ)-Pκ=2(φ)
Pκ=2.32(φ)-Pκ=2
(φ)
Pκ=2.40(φ)-Pκ=2
(φ)
Pκ=2.85(φ)-Pκ=2
(φ)
φ
100
101
102
103
104
105
0
1
[ξ2 (
L=128, from constrained endL=128, floating BCsL=64, floating BCs
0 100 200x
0
100
200y
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
-0.05
P
R
Y
X
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
10 10 10 10 10 105
t0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
φ/π
Applications of SLEApplications of SLE
mX d
• Length of SLE: fractal variation T. Kennedy, 2006
` ´i = 1
jz( t i + dt ) ¡ z( t i ) jdf
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Applications of SLEApplications of SLE• First passage times along fractal curves
A. Zoia, Y. Kantor, M. Kardar, 20071
0.5y
1 1
−1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 0
x
y
1
y
1
−0.5 0.50
−0.5 0.50
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
x−0.5 0.5
x−0.5 0.5
Applications of SLEApplications of SLE
• Morphology of thin ballistically deposited films
0.3
⟨δξ(
0)δξ
(t)⟩
0.0x10+00
1.0x10-06
0.2
0.3
P(ξ
(t))
t0 0.05 0.1
-1.0x10-06
⟨ξ(t)
2 ⟩
0.1
0.2
ξ(t)/(κt)1/2
(κt)
1/2
P
-1 0 1
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
0.1
t0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
• Height isolines are with (Ising)· = 3 § 0:2
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
g ( g)§
Applications of SLEApplications of SLE
• Morphology of KPZ surfaces
• Height isolines are with (self-avoiding random walk)
· = 8=3 § 0:1
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
(self-avoiding random walk)
What about growth patterns?What about growth patterns?
• Both for DLA and Hele-Shaw patterns
M ltifractal spectr m is kno n n mericall• Multifractal spectrum is known numerically
• Very few analytical results
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Continuous Loewner chainsContinuous Loewner chains
• Growth along the whole boundary of a domain
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
ExamplesExamples
• Radial (multiple) SLE for
• Laplacian growth for Integrable model with finite time singularitiesg g
• Dielectric breakdown for
• Hele-Shaw flow with surface tension
• Other regularized Laplacian growth problems
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Integrability of Laplacian growthIntegrability of Laplacian growth
I. Krichever, M. Mineev-Weinstein, P. Wiegmann, A. Zabrodin
S. Richardson, B. Shraiman and D. Bensimon
• LG conserves exterior harmonic moments of the interface
• Families of explicit solutions• Families of explicit solutions
• Integrable model related to random matrices
• Loewner equation appear as a reduction
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Discrete Loewner chainsDiscrete Loewner chains
• Iterated conformal maps M. Hastings and L. Levitov, 1998
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
Discrete Loewner chainsDiscrete Loewner chains
M. Stepanov and L. Levitov, 2001
• Excellent tool for generating and studying DLA-like patternsExcellent tool for generating and studying DLA like patterns
• Variants and generalizations: interpolations between DLA and LG Laplacian random walks
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
and LG, Laplacian random walks, …
ChallengesChallenges
• Applications of SLE to disordered systems: spin glasses,electronic localization and quantum Hall transitions
• Application to non-equilibrium systems: turbulence,force chains in jammed granular matterj g
• Analysis of Loewner chains and applications to growth phenomena: Laplacian growth DLA fractures etcphenomena: Laplacian growth, DLA, fractures, etc.
• Combining integrability with stochastic dynamics?
• 3D random shapes: conformal maps are not useful…
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
3D DLA3D DLA
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008
• From http://math.mit.edu/~chr/research/3d-dla.htm
ThanksThanks
M. BauerR. Bauer
G. LawlerA. Ludwig
A. BelikovD. BeliaevD Bernard
gN. MakarovB. Nienhuis P OikonomouD. Bernard
E. BettelheimI. Binder
P. OikonomouI. RushkinO. Schramm
J. CardyB. DuplaniterL. Kadanoff
S. SheffieldS. SmirnovP. Wiegmann
W. KagerT. Kennedy
gT. Witten
Colloquium, Texas A&M University , April 17, 2008