still thinkin’ ‘bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · should the 3(16) administrator be the plan...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16) Administration?
Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APAManaging Partner
Ferenczy Benefits Law Center
1
![Page 2: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• Relatively quick discussion about what 3(16) Administration is all about
• Pros and cons of 3(16) Administration: for you and your client
• Alternatives to 3(16) Administration that may solve the client’s issues and Pros and Cons
• Conclusion
2
![Page 3: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
• What is the “ill” that clients are trying to remedy by hiring a 3(16) TPA?
– Often, concern regarding liability• Illusory?
– Recognition that the plan sponsor does not have the wherewithal to be the plan administrator
– Someone, somewhere, said they should have a 3(16) administrator
3
![Page 4: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction
• Once you identify the “ill”:
– Is having a 3(16) administrator the answer?
– Are there other valid options that will accomplish the goal?
– Is the client willing to pay to have the “ill” remedied?
• Do you want to be the one to solve this problem by offering 3(16) services?
4
![Page 5: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
LET’S TALK ABOUT: WHAT IS 3(16) WORK . . . REALLY?
5
![Page 6: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Statutory Background
• ERISA §3(16) defines the “administrator” to be the person designated by the plan or, if not so designated, the plan sponsor
• ERISA §402(a)(1) states that every plan has to have a “named fiduciary” who “shall have authority to control and manage the operation and administration of the plan”
6
![Page 7: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Two Main Plan Fiduciaries
7
The Plan Administrator The Investment Fiduciary
![Page 8: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Right to Delegate
• ERISA §402(b)(2) says that a plan has to have a procedure for delegating responsibilities about plan operations and administration
• ERISA §406(c)(1) expressly provides for the allocation by a fiduciary of any of its responsibilities to another fiduciary, whether named in the plan or not
8
![Page 9: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Delegation Rules
• The delegator remains responsible for anything not delegated
• The delegator remains responsible for prudent delegation – both initially and on an ongoing basis
• The delegate is primarily responsible as a fiduciary for the delegated items
9
![Page 10: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Delegation by Investment Fiduciary Has Always Been Common
• Investment Fiduciary can:
– Do everything itself
– Get advice (from a fiduciary adviser under ERISA §3(21)(a)(ii)
– Delegate investment decision-making to an investment manager under ERISA §3(38)• Note that a true “investment manager” must be an RIA under
federal or state law, a bank, or an insurance company
10
![Page 11: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Delegation by Plan Administrator Has Been Common in Health Plans
• Health plans commonly delegate responsibilities to an insurance or other benefits company
– Evaluate and pay claims
– Answer participants’ and service providers’ questions
– Provide documents and forms toparticipants
11
![Page 12: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What Gets Delegated to a 3(16) Provider?
• First question: What are the Plan Administrator’s duties under ERISA, the IRC, and the Plan?
• Second question: Which of those are going to be delegated from the Plan Administrator to the 3(16) provider?
12
![Page 13: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ERISA and the Plan Administrator• Nowhere in ERISA does it specifically state the full range of
responsibilities of the Plan Administrator
• However, ERISA does provide in various sections that the Plan Administrator is responsible for:
13
• Furnishing the SPD and SMMs to participants
• Notifying DB Ps of funding-based distribution limitations
• Hiring actuary, qualified public accountant
• Filing Forms 5500 • Providing 204(h) notices to Ps • Acting as agent for service of legal process for the plan
• Administering QDROs • Providing QACA notices to Ps • Notifying Ps of change in investment options
• Providing DB annual funding notices, DC SARs
• Notifying DOL/Ps re transfer of excess pension assets to health benefit accounts
• Dealing with the PBGC in re DBplan terminations
• Providing participants with blackout notices
• Providing Ps with notice of right to divest from ER securities
• Advising PBGC of reportable events
• Maintaining plan records • Suing on behalf of the plan • Responding to P requests
![Page 14: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What About theInternal Revenue Code?
• Code §414 defines the “plan administrator” similarly to ERISA §3(16)
• However, the Code does provide in various sections that the Plan Administrator is responsible for:
14
• Administering QDROs • Providing 402(f) notices re rollovers
• Filing actuarial report with IRS
• Filing Forms 1099R • Doing mandatory rollovers • Withholding taxes from distributions
• Filing Forms 5500
![Page 15: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Plan Document Is Usually Broader• Key issue: authorization to interpret plan
provisions (Firestone v. Bruch authority)
• Others:
15
• Determine answers to admin-related questions
• Establish rules and procedures • Correct defects
• Determine eligibility for participation/receive benefits
• Handle claims • Determine amounts of benefits
• Authorize discretionary disbursements
• Maintain records • Enter into contracts for the plan
• Determine liquidity needs and coordinate with trustee
• Provide notices to participants • Assist participants
• Furnish disclosure information to participants
• Determine QDRO validity • Appoint other advisers
• Act as named fiduciary
![Page 16: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Scope of 3(16) TPA Services
• It’s a continuum …. Where do you fall?
16
High Service 3(16)
Mid-Service 3(16)Low Service 3(16)
(see worksheet)
![Page 17: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Key Elements of a Good 3(16) Product
1. Properly document what you are going to do and what duties the client retains
2. Do not do what you are not authorized to do
3. Make sure that those who handle 3(16) duties are well trained and know what activities are fiduciary in nature
4. Checklists and procedures and oversight
17
![Page 18: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Means of Delegation
• Need to check out the plan document
• Commonly, the document is silent as to the method of delegation, although generally requires it be in writing
• Our preference: a combined service agreement and delegation document
18
![Page 19: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document?
• Our recommendation: NO
• Why?
– If you are the Plan Administrator, you are responsible for everything (even things you didn’t contemplate), unless you affirmatively delegate
– If you delegate, you are responsible for prudently delegating (is the delegate qualified?) and monitoring the delegate (is the delegate doing a good job?)
– Do you really want to delegate to your client?
19
![Page 20: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SPD Formality• The Plan Administrator must be listed on the SPD
– If you are performing Plan Administrator details that affect the participants, you should be listed
– Recommendation: include language in both your agreement and on the SPD supplement that states that, if your services are terminated under the contract, so is your status as the Plan Administrator (and the Plan Sponsor automatically replaces you if no other delegation happens)
20
![Page 21: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Fidelity Bonding
• ERISA §412 states that, “Every fiduciary of an employee benefit plan and every person who handles funds or other property of such aplan” must be bonded
• Labor Reg §2580.412-1, et seq., seem to limit bonding obligation to those who handle “funds or other property” of a plan
– BUT, includes people who authorize disbursements
– Conservative opinion: if you authorize disbursements, you handle funds
21
![Page 22: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
WEIGHING THE PROS AND CONS OF 3(16) ADMINISTRATION – FOR EVERYONE!
22
![Page 23: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Why Does a Client Want 3(16)?
• As noted earlier, generally three reasons:
– Concerns about liability of being a fiduciary and wanting to offload that liability to someone else
– Desire for professional plan administration (and/or recognition that the company does not have the people and wherewithal to do administration)
– Someone told them they want this
• Your first responsibility as a consultant is to see if the client’s reason for seeking out 3(16) services aligns with the work you do (proper fit?)
23
![Page 24: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
What Does the Client Really Get From 3(16)?
• Liability reduction– No direct liability for failure unless it can be shown that the
delegation was imprudent• Converts responsibility for the task to responsibility to make sure they
hire someone qualified for the task
• But note: the client will be sued anyway, as the Plan Sponsor and the main Plan Administrator, so having a 3(16) person will not usually forestall being named in a lawsuit
• Better service– TPA motivated to be more responsive, careful, etc.
• Do you think so?
• Keeps client company on target with its own business– Less commitment of time/resources from the client
• Do you think so?
24
![Page 25: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Are You Adding ValueThat the Client Can See?
• Is the life of a 3(16) client easier than a non-3(16) client?
– Fewer worries?
– Less work?
– Happier participants?
– Fewer mistakes?
• If the answer to this is “no,” there’sa flaw somewhere
25
![Page 26: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What Does the TPA Get from Offering 3(16) Services?
• Higher billings: if you are not charging more for 3(16) services, why not?
• Stronger relationship with client: the more you do for the client, the harder it is for them to leave you
• More control: by controlling more of what goes on with the plan, the more likely you are to have a problem arise because the client didn’t know any better
• Keeping up with the market: your competitors may be offering it
26
![Page 27: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
What Does the TPA Getfrom Offering 3(16) Services?
• Can accommodate many different referral sources
– Each plan can have a different financial adviser, auditor, recordkeeper, so it does not impair relationships with referral sources
27
![Page 28: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Question: Are You Seeing Value in Offering this Service?
• More money?
• Better retention of clients?
• More referrals from advisers?
• Better control over plan administration?– More info more readily available?
– Client more cooperative?
– Client’s cooperation less important, because you are in control?
• Clients more satisfied?
• If the answer to all these is “no,” there’s something wrong
28
![Page 29: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
3(16) Cons for TPA• Potentially more liability
– You are held to a higher standard, so you can be “wrong” more easily
– You have a duty to the participants that you did not have before
– Lawsuits more likely to be in federal court – more expensive, less accessible
– Errors mean more because of this
• Do you need more systems, oversight, formalities?
– Separate company?
– Separate employee group?
29
![Page 30: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
3(16) Cons for TPA
• You have potential for co-fiduciary liability
– A fiduciary is financially responsible for the breaches by other fiduciaries if s/he knows of the breach and does not make reasonable effort to remediate
– How does this change:• Your oversight over client work?
• Your relationship to your client?
• You may need different E&O insurance to cover you for fiduciary breach
30
![Page 31: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
SUGGESTIONS TO HELPTHE PROCESS
31
![Page 32: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
First and Foremost
• Think this through carefully
– What are you going to do?
– How are you going to do it well?
– Can you get paid enough to make it worth your while?
– How and to whom are you going to sell this service, and is there really a market for it?
32
![Page 33: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Second
• Create a structure inside your operation that will enable you to do this
– Different procedures
– Different departments?
– Different oversight?
• Get all the necessary tools
– Systems, if needed
– Insurance coverage
33
![Page 34: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Third
• Protect yourself from liability
– Your first line of defense against liability is YOU
• Operate well
• Establish lines between what is okay and what is not
• Be properly insured
– Have a detailed service agreement and delegation document
• Everyone knows what you do and what you don’t –no ambiguities that can get you into trouble
• Do not bite off more than you can chew
– Liability limitations and reductions
• Some are not legal – be sure to have those that are
34
![Page 35: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Third (continued)
• What to do about co-fiduciary liability?
– Is it better to know than not know?
– What information do you get automatically that can be presumed to tell you about a breach of duty by another:• Information on deferral deposits?
• Investment information?
– What should you do with the information you receive to either oversee potential breaches or prevent knowledge?
35
![Page 36: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Fourth
• Watch what goes on and remediate as needed
• Do not “set it and forget it!”
• Consider developing a “war chest” equal to or more than your insurance deductible, so you are not hard-pressed financially if something happens
• Make sure that your door is open to your employees about concerns they might identify before you do … empower them to share your concerns
36
![Page 37: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
ALTERNATIVES TO 3(16) THAT MAY ACCOMPLISH SIMILAR OBJECTIVES
37
![Page 38: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
MEPS – AN ALTERNATIVE TO
3(16) OR SOMETHING
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT?
38
![Page 39: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
MEP Pros for Clients
• Theoretically, a MEP enables the client to turn over most plan responsibilities to a professional
– Reduced liability for the details of administration
– Professional management
– Less done in client’s office, so time saver
• A MEP is a set menu: very few decisions to be made by the employer, who is ill-equipped to make them
– Usually available funds are chosen
– Recordkeeper is hired
– Documents are drafted
39
![Page 40: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
MEP Cons for Clients
• Harder to leave: requires legal documentation and spinoff
• Less control: if you don’t like the individual service providers, you can’t change them
• Money is not in your control as either Sponsor or Plan Administrator
– Easier to be embezzled by others
– Easier to have results of opinions “forced” on company
– Need cooperation of MEP sponsor to get out
40
![Page 41: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
MEP Pros for TPAs
• Client more closely tied in
– Leaving a MEP involves legal documentation and a spin-off • More expensive to do than just firing the TPA
– Harder for the client to fire you and retain what it likes• Some of the service providers might not work outside the MEP
– Easier for you to “control the conversation”
• The universe of plan options being served is smaller
– Don’t offer what you don’t want to service
– One plan document to know and love and amend as needed (no weird attorney plans with different language)
– Easier to train your people
41
![Page 42: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
MEP Pros for TPAs
• If you are the MEP sponsor, you control the hiring and firing of the other service providers
– Recordkeeper
– Investment manager
– Auditor (if needed)
– Lawyer
– Plan document provider
42
![Page 43: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
MEP Cons for TPAs• One Bad Apple Rule: still applicable and
still a pain
• Not all rules are settled: likely to have new legislation in the next few years– Even if it’s positive legislation, you still need to react to it,
often through new document provisions, new procedures
• If you are not the sponsor, you can be fired … and lose all your clients in one fell swoop
• You are probably doing a MEP through:– One recordkeeper
– One investment adviser
– One CPA auditor
43
![Page 44: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
MEP Cons for TPAs• We don’t know what’s going to happen
– Could be good: Proposed legislation may take care of one bad apple rule and permit one Form 5500
– Could be bad: Proposed legislation may also require more TPA-level reporting
44
![Page 45: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
THE PLAN EXCHANGE – A
VARIATION ON A MEP
45
![Page 46: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Concern Being Addressed• The One Bad Apple Rule: all of the employers in a
MEP are subject to disqualification if there is a defect anywhere in the plan
• Exchange solution:
– Separate plans with one common trust (and possibly group annuity contract)• Everyone is their own apple!
– Plan documents are the same – each plan is a “component” of the whole
– One 3(16), one 3(38), one recordkeeper for all plans in the exchange
46
![Page 47: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Exchange Pros for Client
• Similar reduction of fiduciary duty as with MEP
• No exposure under one bad apple rule
47
![Page 48: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Exchange Cons for Client
• Similar to a MEP
– Less control over structure, service providers, money
– Harder to leave• Client has own plan, but will need new document, new funding
mechanism if leave the exchange
48
![Page 49: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Exchange Pros for TPA
• Similar to MEP
• Lack of one bad apple rule means one error may be less costly than under MEP
• Still “hooks the client” – harder to leave
49
![Page 50: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Exchange Cons for TPA
• Same as MEP, 3(16):
– Increased liability
– If not in control, can be fired
– May chill business with other referral sources
50
![Page 51: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
SO WHERE DID WE END UP?
51
![Page 52: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
All Are Solutions … Sometimes
• All of these options can work to:
– Relieve the employer of some responsibility for that which they know little about
– Better integrate employer with TPA so that it is not as easy to change providers
– Provide additional income to the TPA through additional fees for taking a bigger role
52
![Page 53: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Compare and Contrast• 3(16) work is more individualized, does not require
or provide significant consistency from one client to the next
– Can accommodate all referral sources, platforms
– Can remove parts that don’t work
• MEP and Exchange: less individualized
– Easier to handcuff client to the plan
– May or may not be subject to one bad apple rule
– Uncertainty due to proposed legislation
53
![Page 54: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Questions?
![Page 55: Still Thinkin’ ‘Bout 3(16)€¦ · 2017-04-06 · Should the 3(16) Administrator Be the Plan Administrator in the Document? •Our recommendation: NO •Why? –If you are the](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052007/601b2aa4e888b0017c03de56/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Contact Information
Ilene H. FerenczyFerenczy Benefits Law Center
2200 Century Parkway, Suite 560
Atlanta, Georgia 30345
(678) 399-6602 (V)
(866) 515-5140 (toll free)
(404) 320-1105 (F)
Follow us on Twitter: @ferenczylaw
55