steinback tri state_2010
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
RegionalTransmission
Corridors
Energy Summit 2010Ports-to-Plains AllianceBroomfield, COApril 9, 2010
Energy Summit 2010Ports-to-Plains AllianceBroomfield, COApril 9, 2010
TopicsToday’s Transmission SystemRenewable EnergyTransmission Planning
Proposed ProjectsConceptual Plans
Issues to Address
Tri-State G&T
Tri-State is a member owned, not-for-profit, generation and transmission cooperative
44 member owners across Wyoming, Colorado, Nebraska and New MexicoOur Members serve a population of 1.4 million
Tri-State owns 5,300 miles of HV transmissionAnother 1,300 miles planned over the next 10 years
Tri-State has revamped its interconnection process to expedite the connection of new generation to its system
Tri-State G&T Members
Port-to-Plains—NERC
7
Reno-Alturas
COI
NW to Idaho
West of MCNary
Cross Cascades South
Cross Cascades North
North of John Day
North of Hanford
West ofHatwai
Northwest to Canada
PDCI
Monroe-Echo Lake
Paul-Raver
Paul-Allston
Allston-Keeler
Montana to NW
West of Broadview
West of Colstrip
Midway-Los Banos
Idaho-Sierra
Borah West
Idaho-Montana
Bridger WestPath C
Southwest of Four CornersNorthern-Southern
California
IPP DC
Intermountain-Mona
TOT 1A
TOT 2A
Bonanza West
TOT 2C
TOT 3
TOT 4ATOT 4B
TOT 5
SDG&E-Comision Federal de Electicidad
WOR
EOR
Cholla-Pinnacle Peak
Montana Southease
Western InterconnectTransmission PathsAlberta to BC
NOTE: For clarity, not all WECC Rated Paths are shown.
Southwest Power Pool Transmission
Another Way To Look At It
WinterPeak Load
Spring/FallLoad Valleys
Summer Peak Load
Data: 08/2003 to 08/2004
Utilization Dictates Transmission Rates(HPX)
$-
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
EFFE
CTI
VE $
/MW
H R
AT
NM-AZ @ $5.00/kW-moCO-NM @ $4.00/kW-moWY-CO @ $3.25/kW-mo
RENEWABLES-ONLY MIX OF RESOURCES
TRANSMISSION LINE UTILIATION
TRA
NS
MIS
SIO
N R
ATE
$/M
Wh
How to Improve Transmission Utilization• Geographic Diversity (wind in multiple locations)• Blending wind with solar and other renewables• Use of gas-fired generation for “firming” and meeting load
Transmission Segments
Largely comprised of existing transmission corridors~100 segments identifiedSuitability for siting or path rating not assessedLinkage between WREZs (~60) and Loads Zones (20)
RUPERT
ENDAKO
WILLISTON
GORDON M SHRUM
TUMBLER
PORT MCNEIL
INDEGLOW
NEW 53
NICOLA
GOLDSTREAM
SELKIRK
JANET
KELLY LAKE
NEW56
NEW42
WEST BROOKS EMPRESS
RED DEER
BIG KNIFE CREEK
MONROE
OLYMPIA
TROUTDALE
JOHN DAY
SACAJAWEA
CALGARY
BELL
NEW92
GARRISON
NEW39
NEW93
HAVRE
CONRAD
BRADY
MIDPOINT
NEW 19
BOISE
OXBOW
NEW 15
SUMMER LAKE
CAPT JACK
MIRACLE MILE
MIDWAY
MONA
CASPER NORTH
YELLOWCAKE
NEW 35
LARAMIE RIVER
ARCHER
AULT STERLI
PAWNEE
NEW
LAMAR
NEW
MONTROSEPONCHA
SAN LUIS
WEST CEDAR
ELY
TRACY
NEW 12
NEW 10
NEW 9
MEADNEW 11
ANTELOPE
SERRANO
PISGAH
DEVERS MOUNTAIN
BLYTHE
ALAMORIO
BELLOTA
VACA DIXON
HARQUAHALA
LUNAHILDAGO
WESTWING
SANTA ROSAGREENLEE
CHOLLA
CUDEI
FOUR CORNERS
RIO PUERCO
NEW 28
TOME
NEW 26
CALIENTE
ARROYOCPO
SN FELIPE
TORTOLITA
LOS COCHES
BETHEL
BROADVIEW
WREZ Transmission Segments sub-group chaired by Andy Leoni of Tri-State Generation & Transmission
State Government Interest
Western Governors AssociationColorado Energy Development AuthorityNew Mexico Renewable Energy Transmission AuthorityWyoming Infrastructure AuthorityNebraska—Wind for Export LegislationUpper Midwest Transmission Development Initiative (IA, MN,ND, SD, WI)Texas-CREZ
Local Market versus Export Market
Estimated wind energy potential exceeds local needs.NREL estimate of Ports-to-Plains states: 5 to 9 million MWUS installed generating capacity 2008 (all fuels) 1.1 million MW
Everyone wants to export to either California or southeastStates are trying to be first to market:
Competing with each other for economic development opportunitiesWant to change transmission planning philosophy to focus on wind export in addition to reliability
Export scenarios will put tremendous stress on existing transmission built primarily to serve local load.Electric system stability will limit installed wind generation installation to a fraction of the theoretical capability.
Gateway West—Idaho power and Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp)
SunZia Southwest Transmission Project
Tres Amigas
SPP Expansion Plan
National Grid “Overlay” Concept
The “Battleground” Issues
Who pays (cost allocation)? Customers, generators, utilities, or taxpayersShould local customers/utilities pay for export lines?
States Rights vs. National/Regional/Customer InterestsPermitting, siting, and economic developmentInterstate commerce
Who Plans, Owns & Manages the Grid?Planning Issues
Oversizing Transmission for Optimized Land Use & Economies of ScaleNational Grid OverlayGreen Transmission Lines