status of the cbm experiment v. friese gesellschaft für schwerionenforschung darmstadt, germany...
TRANSCRIPT
Status of the CBM experiment
V. FrieseGesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung
Darmstadt, [email protected]
for the CBM Collaboration
2 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
nuclei
hadronic phase
The goal of high energy heavy-ion physics: Exploring the QCD phase diagram
SPS
RHIC
dilute hadron gas
RHIC, SPS : • crossover QGP hadrons• almost immediate freeze-out
dense bayonic medium
lattice QCD : Fodor / Katz, Nucl. Phys. A 715 (2003) 319
SIS300 : • system experiences a stage of dense baryonic matter• may come near to the end point: critical phenomena ?
SIS300
3 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
30 AGeV : Exciting physics
NA49, J. Phys. G 29 (2003), and preliminary
AGS
SPS
RHIC
Au+Au / Pb+Pb
p+p
Sharp structure in K+/+ exc. fct.,constancy of kaon slopes :Signal of 1st order PT ?
That’s where CBM will measure !
4 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Physics questions and observables
Hadron properties in dense matterChiral symmetry restoration,generation of hadron masses
Penetrating probes : e+e- with high precision / statisticsThreshold production of open charm : D hadrons
Deconfinement, phase transition, critical phenomenaStrangeness production, flow, fluctuations
, K , p direct, , via decay topology
J/ e+e-
Nuclear equation of state at highest baryon densities
Exc. fct. of particle production and collective flow
5 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Challenges and opportunities
e+e-, J/ e+e-, , D : extremely rare probes !
Highest beam intensities / interaction rates needed !
Opportunity: Systematic measurement of these probes as function of beam energy and projectile/target size
W. Cassing et al, Nucl. Phys. A 691(2001) 753
6 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Conditions and requirements
High track multiplicity (700-1000)Beam intensity 109 ions/sec.High interaction rate (10 MHz)
Detector tasks:Tracking in high-density environment STS + TRDReconstruction of secondary vertices (resolution 50 m) STSHadron identification : / K / p separation (t 80 ps) TOFLepton identification : / e separation (pion suppression 10-4) TRD + RICH
central Au+Au @ 25 AGeV, UrQMD + GEANT
Need fast and radiation hard detectors
7 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
The CBM detector
Setup in GEANT4
8 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Feasibility, Simulations
D Kπ(π)GSI Darmstadt, Czech Acad. Sci., RezTechn. Univ. Prague
,ω, e+e-
Univ. Krakow,JINR-LHE Dubna
J/ψ e+e-
INR Moscow
Hadron ID Heidelberg Univ,Warsaw Univ.Kiev Univ. NIPNE BucharestINR Moscow
GEANT4: GSI
TrackingKIP Univ. HeidelbergUniv. MannheimJINR-LHE Dubna
Design & constructionof detectors
Silicon PixelIReS StrasbourgFrankfurt Univ.,GSI Darmstadt,RBI Zagreb,Krakow Univ. LBNL Berkeley
Silicon StripSINP Moscow State U.CKBM St. PetersburgKRI St. Petersburg
RPC-TOFLIP Coimbra, Univ. S. de Compostela,Univ. Heidelberg,GSI Darmstadt,NIPNE BucharestINR MoscowFZ RossendorfIHEP ProtvinoITEP Moscow
Fast TRDJINR-LHE, DubnaGSI Darmstadt,Univ. MünsterINFN Frascati
Straw tubesJINR-LPP, DubnaFZ RossendorfFZ JülichECAL ITEP Moscow RICH
IHEP Protvino
Trigger, DAQKIP Univ. HeidelbergUniv. MannheimGSI DarmstadtKFKI BudapestSilesia Univ.
MagnetJINR-LHE, DubnaGSI Darmstadt
AnalysisGSI Darmstadt,Heidelberg Univ,
Data Acquis.,Analysis
R&D working packages
9 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Feasibility study : open charm
Key variable to suppress background: secondary vertex position
D0 K-+ (central Au+Au @ 25 AGeV)
c = 124 m, BR = 3.8 %BG suppression 2 x 105
Assuming <D0> = 10-3 :
S/B 1SNR = 3 at 2 x 106 eventsdetection rate 13,000 / h
Similar study for D+ K- + + (c = 315 m, BR = 9 %)
First estimate S/B 3
Crucial detector parameters: Material in tracking stationsSingle hit resolution
10 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS)
Pitch 20 m
Low material budget : Potentially d = 20 m
Excellent single hit resolution : 3 m
S/N = 20 - 40
R&D (IReS / LEPSI Strasbourg) : radiation hardness, readout speed
MIMOSA IV Fallback solution : hybrid pixel detectorssee talk by P. Riedler
11 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
K / separation by time of flight
Separation power depends on: flight path time resolution
12 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Time of flight : K- identifcation for D0
Decay + PID efficiency K- from D0 decay
Key issues for detector design : rate capability time resolution scale
13 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Detector R&D : Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC)
Recent developments at LIP Coimbra : Time resolution ( 90 ps) essentially unchanged up to 25 kHz/cm2
Challenge : Counting rate
14 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
FOPI-RPC-R&D
90 cm-14 strips-4 gaps
t < 80 ps
Tail < 2%
Detector resolution
In house developments:90 cm-14 strips anode
2 RPCs in gas box
15 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Feasibility study: J/ e+e-
with cuts: pt(e+,e-) > 1 GeV/c, lab 25o, > 10o
without cuts (incl. misident. pions)
e+e-
e+e-
DDe+e-+X
e+e-
J/e+e-
sumStudy in CDR : S/B 10 after cuts
Now available: conversion in detector materialdominating component, but mostly at low pt
study ongoing
16 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Feasibility study : e+ e-
Background from conversion dominatesAfter cut on e+e- vertex :SNR 3 in 1 M eventsstudy ongoing, tracking needed
17 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Tracking in the STS
TRACK RECONSTRUCTION
XZ (bending) / YZ (non-bending)
TRACK RECONSTRUCTION
XZ (bending) / YZ (non-bending)
18 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Tracking in the STS
RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAMbased on the Cellular Automaton Method
(KIP Heidelberg)
RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAMbased on the Cellular Automaton Method
(KIP Heidelberg)
RECO STATISTICS 100 events Refprim efficiency : 98.36 | 46562Refset efficiency : 94.85 | 49250Allset efficiency : 90.09 | 64860Extra efficiency : 77.79 | 15610Clone probability : 0.11 | 74Ghost probability : 5.18 | 3358Reco MC tracks/event : 648Timing/event : 175 ms
RECO STATISTICS 100 events Refprim efficiency : 98.36 | 46562Refset efficiency : 94.85 | 49250Allset efficiency : 90.09 | 64860Extra efficiency : 77.79 | 15610Clone probability : 0.11 | 74Ghost probability : 5.18 | 3358Reco MC tracks/event : 648Timing/event : 175 ms
RECONSTRUCTIONRECONSTRUCTION•Fetch ROOT MC data•Copy to local arrays and sort•Create segments•Link segments•Create track candidates•Select tracks
Reconstruction efficiency > 95 %
19 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Magnet design
Superconducting dipole magnetField 1 T over 1 m
Field calculatiop by TOSCA
20 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
DAQ / Trigger Architecture
clock
Practically unlimited size
Max. latency uncriticalAvr. latency relevant
Detector
Front endADC
Buffer memory
Event builderand selector
Self triggered digitization: Dead time free
Each hit transported asAddress/Timestap/Value
Compensates builder/selector latency
Use time correlation of hits to define events.Select and archive.
Challenge : reconstruct 1.5 x 109 track/sec.data volume in 1st level trigger 50 Gbytes/sec.
see talk by L. Schmitt
21 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
EU FP6 HP:
Joint Research Projects (approved):
• Fast gaseous detectors • Advanced TOF Systems• Future DAQ and trigger systems
Network activities (approved):
• CBMnet
INTAS:
Submitted proposals to the INTAS-GSI joint call:
• Silicon Strip Detectors• Electromagnetic calorimeter• Transition Radiation detectors• Straw tube tracker• Resistive Plate Chambers
Proposals to EU FP6 (Design and Construction of new facilities) in preparationCall end of 2003
CBM participation in EU programmes
22 2. Workshop „Challenges and Opportunities“, GSI, October 2003 V. Friese
Croatia: RBI, Zagreb
Cyprus: Nikosia Univ. Czech Republic:Czech Acad. Science, RezTechn. Univ. Prague France: IReS Strasbourg
Germany: Univ. Heidelberg, Phys. Inst.Univ. HD, Kirchhoff Inst. Univ. FrankfurtUniv. Mannheim Univ. MünsterFZ RossendorfFZ JülichGSI Darmstadt
Russia:CKBM, St. PetersburgIHEP ProtvinoINR TroitzkITEP MoscowKRI, St. PetersburgKurchatov Inst., MoscowLHE, JINR DubnaLPP, JINR DubnaSINP, Moscow State Univ.
Spain: Santiago de Compostela Univ. Ukraine: Shevshenko Univ. , Kiev
USA: LBNL Berkeley
Hungaria:KFKI BudapestEötvös Univ. Budapest
Italy: INFN CataniaINFN Frascati
Korea:Korea Univ. SeoulPusan Univ.
Poland:Krakow Univ.Warsaw Univ.Silesia Univ. Katowice Portugal: LIP Coimbra
Romania: NIPNE Bucharest
The CBM R&D Collaboration : 35 institutions