status of information systems accreditation isecon, october 2001
DESCRIPTION
STATUS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACCREDITATION ISECON, October 2001. John T.Gorgone, Bentley College David L. Feinstein, University of South Alabama. IS ACCREDITATION EXECUTIVE COMMITEE. Dr. David Feinstein, Univ. of South Alabama Dr. John T. Gorgone, Bentley College - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
1
STATUS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACCREDITATION
ISECON, October 2001
John T.Gorgone, Bentley CollegeDavid L. Feinstein, University of South
Alabama
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
2
IS ACCREDITATION
EXECUTIVE COMMITEE
Dr. David Feinstein, Univ. of South Alabama
Dr. John T. Gorgone, Bentley College
Dr. John C. Henderson, Boston University
Dr Willis K. King, University of Houston
Dr. Benn R. Konsynski, Emory University
Dr. Doris K. Lidtke, Towson University
Dr. Sorel Reisman, California State University
Dr. Jon A. Turner, New York University
Dr. Joe Valacich, Washington State University
Dr. Gayle J. Yaverbaum,Penn State Harrisburg
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
3
Agenda
Overview of U.S. Accreditation Computing Accreditation
Background Status of IS Accreditation Accreditation Process IS Accreditation Criteria Overview Questions
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
4
Three Types of Accreditors1. Regional Accreditors
• Accredit public & private two- & four-year institutions.
• Comprehensive review of all institutional functions
2. National Accreditors• Accredit public & private institutions,
frequently single-purpose institutions
3. Specialized & Professional Accreditors
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
5
Three Types of Accreditors
3. Specialized & Professional Accreditors
1. Accredit specific programs or schools including business schools, accounting programs, computing programs, engineering schools and programs, law schools, medical schools, and health professional programs
2. E.g. AACSB, ABET
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
6
Purposes of Accreditation Assuring Quality
Primary means to assure quality to students & the public
A signal that program meets at least minimal standards for its faculty, curriculum, student services, libraries and fiscal stability.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
7
Purposes of Accreditation Engendering Employer Confidence
Accreditation status is important to employers when evaluating credentials of job applicants and
when deciding whether to provide tuition support for current employees seeking additional education.
Easing Transfer of Courses Among Colleges
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
8
Who Benefits from Accreditation
Students Employers Public Institution
Reputation Department Program
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
9
Five Key Features of Accreditation Self Study: Summary of performance Peer Review: People in the profession Site Visit: Visit team review of
program Action by Accrediting Organization Ongoing External Review: Cycles up
to 10 years
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
10
Agenda
Overview of U.S. Accreditation Computing Accreditation
Background Status of IS Accreditation Accreditation Process IS Accreditation Criteria Overview Questions
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
11
Computing Accreditation Background CS accreditation began in USA in 1986 166 accredited programs at 158
institution in USA Programs reviewed by faculty and
qualified industry visitors (volunteers from universities and industry)
Only programs located in regionally accredited institutions are eligible
Process takes nearly 2 years.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
12
Agenda
Overview of U.S. Accreditation Computing Accreditation
Background Status of IS Accreditation Accreditation Process IS Accreditation Criteria Overview Criteria Details
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
13
IS Accreditation – Current Status
Web survey of Draft Criteria (300 responses)
Revision of Draft Criteria CSAB approved Criteria for testing- 7/00 ABET EC approved pilot test for Fall 2001 IS Criteria posted to web: www.abet.org Documents prepared, Evaluators Trained 2001-2002 Program Review Cycle in
progress
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
14
IS Accreditation – Current Status Program Selected, Self-study
completed October 2001- Team Visit Completed July 2002 - Action on visit September 2002 – Final Statement Next Cycle – 2002-2003 Fall 2002 – additional visits
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
15
IS Accreditation – Current Status
Review & Revise materials Review & Revise Proposed IS
Criteria (August 2000 version 5.2) ABET final approval of IS Criteria
11/3/01 Identify IS programs interested in
accreditation
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
16
IS Accreditation – Current Status Identify IS faculty and IS industry
professional interested becoming program evaluators Membership in the ACM, the IEEE/CS,
or the AIS is expected. Good communication skills are necessary.
Ph.D. In a computing discipline At least associate professor rank See www.csab.org for details &
application
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
17
Agenda
Overview of U.S. Accreditation Computing Accreditation
Background Status of IS Accreditation Accreditation Process IS Accreditation Criteria Overview Criteria Details
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
18
Process for Initial Accreditation
Study the Criteria Be sure your program meets the
Criteria Be sure all students in the program
meet the Criteria Be certain your infrastructure meets
the Criteria Be sure you have support from the
Administration
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
19
Process - Pre-visit Self-analysis of program
does it meet CAC Criteria? Invitation issued by CAC (November) Prepare self-study and collect course
materials (Fall prior to visit) Submit Request for Evaluation (January
31) Pay fee for evaluation (June 1) Submit Self-Study (July 1)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
20
Self-Study - 1
One Volume + Appendix Contents
Objectives and Assessment Student Support Faculty Curriculum Laboratory and Computing Facilities Institutional Support and Financial Resources Institutional Facilities
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
21
Self-Study - 2 - Appendices
I. Information Relative to the Entire Institution II. General Information on the Unit
Responsible for the Information Systems Program
III. Finances IV. IS Program Personnel and Policies
Towards Consulting, Professional Development, and Recruiting
V. IS Program Enrollment and Degree Data VI. Admission Requirements
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
22
Process - Visit Schedule visit (July - August)
Work with your Administration to be sure they can meet with visitors
Host 2-3 day visit (Sep.-Nov.) Prepare schedule with Team Chair Prepare course exhibits and space for
visitors Be certain faculty, students, &
administrators are available for scheduled meetings
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
23
Process - Post-visit Receive Preliminary Statement (March) Respond to Preliminary Statement (30
days) Preliminary report finalized Presentation at CAC Annual Meeting (July) Final Statement received (August - Sept.)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
24
Accreditation Actions Each program reviewed in Fall xx
is voted on at the CAC Annual Meeting in July of xx+1
Programs are informed of Action in August of xx+1
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
25
Accreditation Actions & Durations
GeneralAction Duration (Yrs)
NGR Next General Review 6IR Interim Report 2IV Interim Visit 2SC Show Cause 1
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
26
Agenda
Overview of U.S. Accreditation Computing Accreditation
Background Status of IS Accreditation Accreditation Process IS Accreditation Criteria Overview Questions
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
27
• Assure graduates of an accredited program are adequately prepared to enter and continue the practice of information systems
• Stimulate the improvement of IS education
• Encourage new & innovative approaches to IS education and its assessment
• Identify accredited programs to the public
IS Accreditation: Objectives
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
28
Philosophy
Institutions and Programs define mission and objectives to meet the needs of their constituents -- enable program differentiation
Programs demonstrate how criteria and educational objectives are being met
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
29
Evaluative Criteria Structure
Two documents
1. Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs in the United States
eight Categories each category is divided
into Intent Standards
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
30
Evaluative Criteria Structure
2. Guidance for Interpreting the Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Computing in the United States Eight sections
one per criteria category contents mapped to specific
Standards
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
31
Criteria Categories Objectives and Assessments Students Faculty Curriculum Technology Infrastructure Institutional Support/Financial Resources Program Delivery Institutional Facilities
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
32
Agenda
Overview of U.S. Accreditation Computing Accreditation
Background Status of IS Accreditation Accreditation Process IS Accreditation Criteria Overview Questions
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
33
Criteria Overview
What is an Intent statement? An Intent statement is a high level
description of a program that conforms to a particular Criteria Category.
In order to be accreditable, a program must meet the Intent statement of every Category.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
34
Criteria Overview Example of an Intent Statement
Category: Faculty Faculty members are current and
active in the discipline and have the necessary technical breadth and depth to support a modern information systems program.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
35
Criteria Overview The Standards
Standards are a series of enumerated statements of how to minimally meet the Intent of a particular Category.
Standards are both qualitative and quantitative
Standards define minimum essential elements
A program that satisfies all the Standards of a Category meets the Intent of that Category.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
36
Criteria Overview Examples of Standards
Category: FacultyOne of the five standards in the Category:
III.1 Interests, qualifications, and scholarly contributions must be sufficient to teach the courses, plan & modify the courses &
curriculum, and remain abreast of current
developments in information systems.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
37
Agenda
Overview of U.S. Accreditation Computing Accreditation Background Status of IS Accreditation Accreditation Process IS Accreditation Criteria Overview Questions Criteria Details available for
discussion
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
38
Questions What questions do you have about
IS Accreditation? Criteria details are available for
discussion as time permits.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
39
Criteria Criteria: Details
General introduction Detailed discussion of each Criteria
category will include Intent Standards
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
40
Objectives and Assessments Students Faculty Curriculum Technology Infrastructure Institutional Support/Financial Resources Program Delivery Institutional Facilities
Criteria Categories
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
41
Objectives and Assessments CategoryMotivation - 1
Why include Objectives and Assessments in the criteria? Aligns CSAB/ABET accreditation with
direction of regional accreditation bodies criteria of other program oriented
accreditation bodies
Demonstrates stable program direction in the face of natural program evolution
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
42
Objectives and Assessments
Motivation - 2 Why are documented objectives important?
Ensures alignment with stated mission and goals
Provides program direction to plan appropriate program evolution to form the basis for decisions
Enables effectiveness measurement of program activities
Provides foundation for continuous improvement
Addresses issue of increased accountability
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
43
I. Objectives and Assessments
The program has documented educational objectives that are consistent with the mission of the institution.
The program has in place processes to regularly assess its progress against its objectives and uses the results of the assessments to identify program improvements and to modify the program’s objectives.
Intent:
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
44
The program must have documented, educational objectives.
Objectives must include expected outcomes for graduating students.
Mechanisms must be in place to periodically review the program and courses.
Standards:
I. Objectives and Assessments
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
45
Objectives and Assessments: Standards (Cont’d.)
Program assessment results must be used to help identify and implement program improvement.
Program review and actions
taken must be documented.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
46
Students can complete the program in a reasonable amount of time.
Students have ample opportunity to interact with their instructors and are offered timely guidance and advice about the program’s requirements and their career alternatives.
Students who graduate the program meet all program requirements.
Intent:II. Students
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
47
Courses offered with sufficient frequency for students to complete the program in a timely manner.
Program must be structured to ensure effective interaction between teaching faculty and students.
Standards:
II. Students
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
48
Students: Standards (Cont’d)
Advising on program completion, course selection and career opportunities must be available to all students.
Standards and procedures are established that ensure that graduates meet program requirements.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
49
Faculty members are current and active in the discipline and have the necessary technical breadth and depth to support a modern information systems program.
Intent:
III. Faculty
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
50
Interests, qualifications, and scholarly contributions must be sufficient to teach the courses, plan and modify the courses and
curriculum, and remain abreast of current
developments in information systems. Must have a level of competence
normally obtained through graduate work in information systems.
Standards:
III. Faculty
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
51
A majority should hold terminal degrees.
Some full-time faculty members must
have a Ph.D in information systems or a closely related area.
All faculty members must remain current in the discipline.
Faculty: Standards (Cont’d)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
52
The curriculum combines professional requirements with general education requirements and electives:
to prepare students for a professional career in the information systems field,
for further study in information systems, and
for functioning in modern society.
Intent:IV. Curriculum
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
53
IV. Curriculum: Intent (con’t)
The professional requirements include coverage of basic and advanced topics in information systems as well as an emphasis on an IS environment.
Curricula are consistent with widely recognized models and standards.
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
54
Curriculum standards are specified in terms of semester-hours of study.
(Thirty semester-hours generally constitute one year of full-time study and is equivalent to 45 quarter-hours)
A course or a specific part of a course can only be applied toward one standard.
Standards – Background Information
IV. Curriculum
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
55
Must include at least 30 semester-hours of study in information systems topics.
Most contain at least 15 semester-hours of study in an information systems environment, as specified below.
Standards General:
IV. Curriculum
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
56
Must include at least 9 semester-hours of study in quantitative analysis as specified under quantitative analysis.
Must include at least 30 semester-hours of study in general education to broaden the background of the student.
Curriculum Standards: General (Cont’d)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
57
Students take a broad-based core of fundamental IS material - at least 12 semester hours.
The core must provide basic coverage of: hardware and software modern programming language data management networking and telecommunications analysis and design and the role of IS in organizations.
Standards IS: 30 hrs
IV. Curriculum
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
58
Theoretical foundations, analysis, and design must be stressed within the program.
Students must be exposed to a variety of information of computing systems.
Students must become proficient in one modern programming language.
Curriculum Standards: IS (Cont’d)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
59
All students must take at least 12 semester hours of advanced course work in information systems that provides breadth and builds on the core to provide depth.
Curriculum Standards: IS (Cont’d)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
60
IV. Curriculum
The 15 semester hours must be a cohesive body of knowledge to prepare the student to function effectively as an IS professional in the IS environment.
Standards IS Environment: 15 hrs
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
61
The curriculum must include at least 9 hours of quantitative analysis beyond pre-calculus
Statistics must be included Calculus and discrete
mathematics must be included
Standards Quantitative Analysis: 9 hrs
IV. Curriculum
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
62
Oral and written communication skills of the student must be developed and applied in the program.
There must be sufficient coverage of global, economic, social and ethical implications of computing to give students an understanding of a broad range of issues in this area.
Collaborative skills must be developed and applied in the program.
Standards - Additional Areas of Study:
IV. Curriculum
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
63
Computer resources are available, accessible, and adequately supported to enable students to complete course work and to support faculty teaching needs and scholarly activity
Intent:
V. Technology Infrastructure
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
64
Each student must have adequate and reasonable access to the systems needed for each course.
Documentation for hardware and software must be readily accessible to faculty and students.
All faculty members must have access to adequate computing resources for class preparation and for scholarly activities.
V. Technology Infrastructure: Standards
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
65
There must be adequate support personnel to install and maintain computing resources.
Instructional assistance must be provided for the computing resources.
V. Technology Infrastructure: Standards (Cont’d)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
66
The institution’s support for the program and the financial resources available to the program are sufficient to provide an environment in which the program can achieve its objectives.
Support and resources are sufficient to provide assurance that an accredited program will retain its strength throughout the period of accreditation.
Intent:
VI. Institutional Support and Financial Resources:
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
67
Support for faculty must be sufficient to enable the program to attract and retain high-quality faculty capable of supporting the program objectives.
There must be sufficient support and financial resources to allow faculty members to attend national technical meetings with sufficient frequency to maintain competence as teachers and scholars.
VI. Institutional Support and Financial Resources
Standards:
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
68
There must be support and recognition of scholarly activities.
There must be office support consistent with the type of program, level of scholarly activity, and needs of the faculty members.
Adequate time must be assigned for the administration of the program.
Institutional Support and Financial Resources: Standards (Con’t)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
69
Upper levels of administration must provide the program with the resources and atmosphere to function effectively with the rest of the institution.
Resources must be provided to acquire and maintain laboratory facilities that meet the needs of the program.
Institutional Support and Financial Resources: Standards (Con’t)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
70
Resources must be provided to support library and related information retrieval facilities that meet the needs of the program.
There must be evidence of continuity of institutional support and financial resources.
Institutional Support and Financial Resources: Standards (Con’t)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
71
There are enough faculty members to cover the curriculum reasonably and to allow an appropriate mix of teaching and scholarly activity.
Intent:
VII. Program Delivery
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
72
There must be enough full-time faculty members with primary commitment to the program to provide continuity and stability.
Full-time faculty members must oversee all course work.
Full-time faculty members must cover most of the total classroom instruction.
VII. Program DeliveryStandards:
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
73
Faculty members must remain current in the discipline.
All full-time faculty members must have sufficient time for scholarly activities and professional development.
Advising duties must be a recognized part of faculty members’ workloads.
Program Delivery: Standards (Con’t)
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
74
Institutional facilities including the library, other electronic information retrieval systems, computer networks, classrooms, and offices are adequate to support the objectives of the program.
Intent:
VIII. Institutional Facilities
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
75
The library that serves the information systems program must be adequately staffed with professional librarians and support personnel.
The library’s technical collection must include up-to-date textbooks, reference works, and publications of professional and research organizations.
Standards:
VIII. Institutional Facilities
ISECON 2001 Gorgone & Feinstein
76
Systems for locating and obtaining electronic information must be available.
Classrooms must be adequately equipped for the courses taught in them.
Faculty offices must be adequate to enable faculty members to meet their responsibilities to students and for their professional needs.
VIII. Institutional Facilities: Standards (Con’t)