status of collaborative team work on h.idscheme, h.id-ra and h.irp chiaki ishikawa (ttc)

7
Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

Upload: clement-williamson

Post on 31-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP

Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

Page 2: Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

Summary

• Many meetings after the last CJK meeting (next slide).

• H.IRP sailed smoothly.• H.IDscheme ran into many procedural and

content issues, and still under serious discussion.

Page 3: Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

List of meetings• Fall of 2010: ITU-T JCA-NID unofficial ad-hoc meetings of experts.• Nov 24-26, 2010: The last CJK NID/USN meeting in Tokyo. • Nov 29-Dec 4, 2010: ITU-T SG16 WP2 Rapporteur meeting.• March 14-25, 2011: ITU-T SG16 Q21,Q22• April 19, 20: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 meeting in Stockholm.• May 9-13, 2011: The last Q21/Q22 session at GSI-IoT meeting in

Geneva• June 20, 21: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 29174-1 and 29174-2 DoC

Meeting• May 22: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31 plenary in Vienna• June 26, 30, July 5 : Ad-hoc committee organized by chair of SC31• July 11th: Continuation of  June 20’s 29174-1 and 29174-2 DoC

Meeting.

Page 4: Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

• Fall of 2010: ITU-T JCA-NID unofficial ad-hoc meetings of experts.

• Nov 24-26, 2010: The last CJK NID/USN meeting in Tokyo. • Nov 29-Dec 4, 2010: ITU-T SG16 WP2 Rapporteur meeting.

– On Nov 29th afternoon, the ad-hoc meeting of experts organized by ITU-T JCA-NID recommended that the proposals from ITU-T SG16 (H.IDscheme) and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC 31/WG 6 (MII) be merged.

– So the merged idea was discussed there with ITU-T SG16 editors and ISO Project editor and draft was created and submitted to SG16 and brought back to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6.

– Basically, H.IRP | 29177 was agreed upon to be common standard without much difficulty.

Page 5: Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

• March 14-25, 2011: ITU-T SG16 Q21,Q22– The final (very little edited) ToR for Collaborative team work was

approved, and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 was asked to approve that.• April 19, 20: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 meeting in Stockholm.

– ToR was approved and the SC31 was asked to approve it.• May 9-13, 2011: The last Q21/Q22 session at GSI-IoT meeting

in Geneva– H.ID-RA | 29174-2 being discussed.– COMMON format documents were tentatively proposed for trial

(after a straw poll) for H.IDScheme | 29174-1 and H.ID-RA | 29174-2 and so were created and sent from ITU-T SG16 to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6.

– Again, H.IRP | 29177 had not much difficulty.

Page 6: Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

• May 22: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31 plenary in Vienna– ToR was finally approved. It is official.– This meeting raised “scope issues” within ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 31. WG6

has a rather narrow scope and cannot create standard that “identify” physical objects. An ad-hoc meeting was proposed to resolve this issue and to create a recommendation.

• June 20: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 29174-1 and 29174-2 DoC Meeting– The scope issues and a few issues were raised. The scope issues

needed to wait for the ad-hoc meeting report (by July 11th, the continuation meeting.)

• June 21: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 29177 (H.IRP)– Again, this document sailed smoothly.

Page 7: Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

• June 26, 30, July 5 : Ad-hoc committee organized by chair of SC31– The scope issues are caused due to the division of target areas assumed by

WGs of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31.– ITU-T finds it difficult to handle this division of area because it affects the

wording, definition and other aspects of the draft Recommendation and International Standard in a somewhat contorted manner.

– The chair is expected to submit a summary to SC31 and to WG6.– WG6 Project Editor of 29174-1 and 29174-2 can decide how to cope with the

suggestion.• July 11th: Continuation of  June 20’s 29174-1 and 29174-2 DoC

Meeting.– CJK participants (on ITU-SG16 WP2) will find out how the SC31 ad-hoc affects

the draft of 29174-1.