stats phase ii

Upload: ashlan-napier

Post on 05-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    1/13

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    2/13

    Abstract

    The formula c=d describes the relationship between a circular objects circumference

    and its diameter, however, this paper seeks to prove that there is a constant

    relationship between the circumference and diameter of round objects without the use

    of said formula. It relies instead on measurements collected by college statistics

    students and the analysis of the data collected to prove a direct correlation between the

    circumference and diameter.

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 2

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    3/13

    On the Relationship Between the Diameter and Circumference of Circular Objects

    ! The circumference, the enclosing boundary of a curved geometric figure, has

    often been defined as the diameter of a curved figure multiplied by pi, a number

    approximating to about 3.14. Many students have accepted this formula as law without

    bothering to check the facts themselves, however, in the following experiment, I will

    seek to prove that the circumference can accurately be calculated by multiplying the

    diameter by pi.

    Method

    Participants

    ! The following technique was used by an online college statistics class to

    measure the circumference and diameter of 392 objects. Once the data was collected

    by the students, it was submitted to the moodle website where the professor compiled

    the information onto a spreadsheet.

    Measures

    ! In this experiment, objects were measured using a piece of string and a number

    of rulers. The string was placed along the center of the face of the circular object like so:

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 3

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    4/13

    (Please note that tape was not used in the measurement process, but for photographing

    purposes only.) The string was then marked with a pencil where it met the edges of the

    face of the circular object. The space between these marks was measured with a ruler

    to record the diameter of the object as pictured below.

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 4

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    5/13

    The same general process was used to measure the circumference of the circular

    object. The only difference being that the string was wrapped around the body of the

    object like so:

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 5

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    6/13

    Again, the tape was only used for photographing purposes. After the string was marked

    on the places it overlapped, the space between the two marks was measured as before.

    Participants

    This technique was used by an online college statistics class to measure the

    circumference and diameter of 392 objects. Once the data was collected by the

    students, it was submitted to the moodle website where the professor compiled the

    information onto a spreadsheet.

    Procedure:

    The data associated with 25 objects was randomly selected using a TI84 calculator s

    randInt application (randInt- >0,392, 25), and recorded

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 6

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    7/13

    in the following table. Also recorded was the Pi (circumference/diameter) of each object.

    Results

    Table 1

    Experimental Data

    Item # Object Circumference Diameter Pi

    1 Cup 262 82.5 3.1758

    2 Mason Jar Lid 8.75 2.5 3.5

    3 Green Ball 6.2 1.6 3.875

    4 Quarter 3.375 0.938 3.5981

    5 Clock Face 73 23.1 3.1602

    6 Baseball 30 6 5

    7 Campbells Soup 8.5 2.625 3.2381

    8 Vase 19.25 6 3.2083

    9 Blue Bowl 11.5 5.75 2

    10 CD 18 4.75 3.7895

    11 Toilet Paper Roll 27.946 2.55 10.959

    12 Yo-Yo 8 2.8 2.8571

    13 Drum 37.75 12.125 3.1134

    14 Tuna Can 10.625 3.375 3.1481

    15 Trash Can 27.5 8.75 3.1429

    16 Poker Chip 122.5 39 3.141

    17 AA Battery 43.8 14 3.1286

    18 Corn Tortilla 45.7 14 3.2643

    19 Ping Pong Ball 5 2 2.5

    20 Canned Peas 9.25 3 3.0833

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 7

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    8/13

    Item # Object Circumference Diameter Pi

    21 PX Bottle 4.25 1.25 3.4

    22 Wall Clock 31.5 9 3.5

    23 Ranch Beans 283 88.9 3.1834

    24 Mirror 44.4 36.25 1.2248

    25 Stove Knob 2.5 1 2.5

    This data can be assumed to be representative of the population (the other objects

    measured by the students), because it was obtained through the randomizing features

    of the TI-84 calculator, which possesses no capacity for bias or human error. Using 1-

    VarStats on the columns consisting of the measurements for Circumference, Diameter,

    and Pi, the following data was calculated.

    Table 2

    Statistics Related to the Circumference, Diameter, and Pi Calculation.

    Mean Median SD Q1 Q3 Min. Max.

    Circumference

    Diameter

    Pi

    47.18 19.25 73 8.25 44.1 2.5 283

    14.95 5.75 24 2.525 14 0.938 88.9

    3.468 3.1758 1.7 3.0984 3.5 1.2248 10.9592

    Although the statistics pertaining to both the circumference and the diameter of the data

    fluctuates drastically, those related to Pi (circumference/diameter) stay relatively

    constant. The standard deviation from the mean is also quite small, suggesting that the

    relationship between the circumference and the diameter of each object holds fairly

    constant as well.

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 8

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    9/13

    ! In order to test the hypothesis that there is a constant relationship between the

    circumference and diameter of round objects, a linear regression was performed on the

    circumference and diameter data located in Table 1. The steps and procedures used are

    as follows:

    1. A scatter plot was constructed with the circumference listed on the x-axis and the

    diameter listed on the y-axis. (See Scatter Plot 1 in the Index for graph.) With the

    exception of one outlier, the data appeared to exhibit a strong, positive linear trend.

    2. The two assumptions needed to calculate Pearsons correlation were then

    addressed:

    a. Both variables were randomly selected from the populations they represented

    through the use of the RandInt function on the calculator.

    b. Together the variables came from a bivariate normal population. This assumption

    was met by the linear trend exhibited by the scatter plot.

    3. Using a calculator, the sample correlation was calculated and found to be 0.9793,

    23.203 reenforcing a strong, positive linear trend.

    4. A complete hypothesis test was then constructed and yielded a p value of

    approximately zero, leading to the conclusion that the null hypothesis could be

    rejected, that is Ho: =0

    Discussion

    ! Upon examination of these statistics, it is reasonable to conclude that there is a

    definite relationship between the circumference of a curved geometrical figure and its

    diameter. According to common knowledge, this relationship can be found in the form of

    pi, a number approximating to about 3.14, however, the data shown in Table 2. has a

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 9

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    10/13

    slightly higher median value of 3.18, which could easily be the result of human error in

    the measurement process. For example, the students might have improperly recorded

    the results of either their circumference or diameter measurement, or even measured

    incorrectly. It is also important to address the outlier mentioned in the previous section.

    This value came from a student who measured a toilet paper roll with a circumference

    of 27.946 and a diameter of 2.55, resulting in a pi value of 10.959. These values could

    have been the result of human error as well, but were still included in all of the

    calculations listed in the Results section of this paper, resulting in slightly skewed data.

    Index

    Table 4.

    Sample Data

    Item # Object Circumference Diameter Pi

    1 Cup 262 82.5 3.1758

    2 Mason Jar Lid 8.75 2.5 3.5

    3 Green Ball 6.2 1.6 3.875

    4 Quarter 3.375 0.938 3.5981

    5 Clock Face 73 23.1 3.1602

    6 Baseball 30 6 5

    7 Campbells Soup 8.5 2.625 3.2381

    8 Vase 19.25 6 3.2083

    9 Blue Bowl 11.5 5.75 2

    10 CD 18 4.75 3.7895

    11 Toilet Paper Roll 27.946 2.55 10.959

    12 Yo-Yo 8 2.8 2.8571

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 10

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    11/13

    Item # Object Circumference Diameter Pi

    13 Drum 37.75 12.125 3.1134

    14 Tuna Can 10.625 3.375 3.1481

    15 Trash Can 27.5 8.75 3.1429

    16 Poker Chip 122.5 39 3.141

    17 AA Battery 43.8 14 3.1286

    18 Corn Tortilla 45.7 14 3.2643

    19 Ping Pong Ball 5 2 2.5

    20 Canned Peas 9.25 3 3.0833

    21 PX Bottle 4.25 1.25 3.4

    22 Wall Clock 31.5 9 3.5

    23 Ranch Beans 283 88.9 3.1834

    24 Mirror 44.4 36.25 1.2248

    25 Stove Knob 2.5 1 2.5

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 11

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    12/13

    Table 3.

    Hypothesis Test

    1. 5. p=0

    2. Ho: =0 Ha:0

    6. reject the nullhypothesis.

    3. t-distribution 7. There is enough

    4. The data is normalSee Scatter Plot 1.

    there is a correlationbetween the circumferenceand the diameter of acircular object.

    Scatter Plot 1.

    Circumference vs. Diameter.

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 12

    0

    22.5

    45

    67.5

    90

    0 75 150 225 300

    Circumference vs. Diameter

  • 7/31/2019 Stats Phase II

    13/13

    My email crashed. Please accept this link as a substitute for my rough draft as is

    contains most of the information needed.

    http://podcasts.taftcollege.edu/podcasts/stat1510/students/exams/summer12/

    Napier4109.m4v

    Stats 1510 Research Project! 13