statistics, valuation process, tips...5 pp cv :2 pp track record : 2pp part b2 –pdf full proposal:...
TRANSCRIPT
APRE 2013
www.apre.itSerena Borgna - [email protected]
APRE, NCP - National Contact Point Horizon 2020� ERC- European Research Council
� Societal Challenge 2 “Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry, Marine, Maritime and Inland
Water Research and the bioeconomy”
� LEIT – NMBP “Nanotechnologies, advanced materials and advanced manufacturing and processing”
STATISTICS, VALUATION PROCESS, TIPS
17 March 2017, Trieste
ERC DAY: CELEBRATING 10 YEARS OF
EXCELLENCE IN RESEARCH
*Source: ERCEA presentations
Excellent Science
� European Research Council
� Frontier research by the best individual teams
� Future and Emerging Technologies
� Collaborative research to open new fields of innovation
� Marie Skłodowska Curie actions
� Opportunities for training and career development
� Research infrastructures (including e-infrastructure)
� Ensuring access to world-class facilities
Industrial Technologies
� Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies
� ICT, nanotechnologies, materials, biotechnology, manufacturing, space
� Access to risk finance
� Leveraging private finance and venture capital for research and innovation
� Innovation in SMEs
� Fostering all forms of innovation in all types of SMEs
Societal Challenges
� Health, demographic change and wellbeing
� Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research & the bioeconomy
� Secure, clean and efficient energy
� Smart, green and integrated transport
� Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials
� Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
� Security society
European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)
Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation
Science with and for society
Joint Research Center (JRC)
2Euratom
HORIZON 2020
WHY ERC IS SPECIAL?
� All fields of science and scholarship are eligible
� Investigator-driven, BOTTOM-UP
� Scientific EXCELLENCE is the only criterion
� Individual team + research project
� Irrespective of nationality, gender or age of researchers
� Investment in research talent
� ATTRACTIVE, flexible grants, up to five years (up to 3,5 mln €)
� Under control of the Principal Investigator - PORTABILITY
� INDEPENDENT Individual teams in Europe
� All nationalities can apply
� Host organisation to be located in EU or Associated Country
� Research team (no network)
* Può variare a seconda del Work Programme
Proof of Concept
(PoC)
Starting Grant (StG)
Consolidator Grant (CoG)
Advanced Grant (AdG)
Synergy Grant (SyG)
FUNDING SCHEME
Novelty
WP 2018
ERC STATISTICs and IT
PARTICIPATION
│ 6
ERC FUNDED PROJECTS BY
COUNTRY OF HI
380 funded projects
based at a Host
Institution in Italy
Source ERCEA. Update 14.12.16
│ 7
SUCCESS RATE BY COUNTRY OF HI
5% IT success rate
│ 8
TOP HOST INSTITUTIONS IN ITALY
│ 9
ERC FUNDED PROJECTS BY PI
NATIONALITY
4th in the rank
│ 10
GRANTEES AT HOME AND ABROAD
294 Italian grantees abroad
30 foreign grantees in Italy
350 Italian grantees in Italy
│ 11
ERC GRANTS VERSUS TOP PUBLICATIONS
│ 12
PRIORITY TO YOUNG SCIENTISTS
Two-thirds of ERC grants
to early-stage Principal
Investigators.
+ 30 000 PhD and post-
doc researchers working
in ERC teams.
EVALUATION
Excellence is the sole evaluation criterion, at two levels:
HOW ERC RESEARCH PROPOSALS ARE
EVALUATED?
Research Project
• Ground breaking nature
• Potential impact
• Scientific Approach
Principal Investigator
• Intellectual capacity
• Creativity
• Commitment
PROPOSAL STRUCTURE
PART A – online forms
A1 :Proposal and PI info
A2 :HI info
A3 : Budget
PART B1 – pdf
Extended Synopsis : 5 pp
CV :2 pp
Track Record : 2pp
PART B2 –pdf
Full Proposal: 15 pp
Annexes – pdf
Support letter HI
Annex Ethical Issues (if applicable)
Additional Docs, ifapplicable
Remote assessment by Panel members
of section 1 – PI and synopsis (part B1)
Panel meeting
Proposals retained
for step 2:
Score A
STEP 1
EVALUATION PROCEDURE: two steps
Score:
B or C
STEP 2
Remote assessment by Panel members
and reviewers of full proposal (B1+B2)
Panel meeting + interview (StG and CoG)
Ranked list of
proposals:
Score A
Score
: B
Feedback to
applicants
Social Sciences and Humanities� SH1 Individuals, Markets and Organisations
� SH2 Institutions, Values, Environment and Space
� SH3 The Social World, Diversity, Population
� SH4 The Human Mind and Its Complexity
� SH5 Cultures and Cultural Production
� SH6 The Study of the Human Past
Life Sciences� LS1 Molecular and Structural Biology and
Biochemistry
� LS2 Genetics, Genomics, Bioinformatics and
Systems Biology
� LS3 Cellular and Developmental Biology
� LS4 Physiology, Pathophysiology and
Endocrinology
� LS5 Neurosciences and Neural Disorders
� LS6 Immunity and Infection
� LS7 Diagnostic Tools, Therapies & Public Health
� LS8 Evolutionary, Population and Environmental
Biology
� LS9 Applied Life Sciences and Biotechnology
Physical Sciences & Engineering� PE1 Mathematics
� PE2 Fundamental Constituents of Matter
� PE3 Condensed Matter Physics
� PE4 Physical & Analytical Chemical Sciences
� PE5 Synthetic Chemistry and Materials
� PE6 Computer Science & Informatics
� PE7 Systems & Communication Engineering
� PE8 Products & Process Engineering
� PE9 Universe Sciences
� PE10 Earth System Science
Each panel :Panel Chair and 10-16 Panel Members
ERC EVALUATION: PANEL STRUCTURE
│ 18
� PANEL MEMBERS: typically 600 PMs
involved per call
� High-level scientists
� Recruited by ScC from all over the world
� About 10-16 members plus chair person
� REMOTE REFEREES: typically 2000 / call
� Each evaluate only a small number of
proposals
Other (7%)
WHO EVALUATES THE PROPOSALS ?
(7%)USA
In Step 1: Panel members see only Part B1 of the proposal (prepare it accordingly!)
� Pay particular attention to the ground-breaking nature of the research project
– no incremental research. State-of-the-art is not enough. Think big!
� Know your competitors – what is the state of play and why is your idea and
scientific approach outstanding?
� Part B1: concise and clear presentation is crucial (not all evaluators are
experts in your field)
� Outline of the methodological approach is recommended (feasibility
assessment)� risks!
� Show your scientific independence in your CV (model CV provided in the part
B1 template)
� Select the "right" Panel – very IMPORTANT!, ID explanation for 2ry panel
│
TIPS - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTS
B1 AND B2
In Step 2: Both Part B1 and B2 are read by Panel Members & Remote Referees
DO NOT JUST REPEAT THE SYNOPSIS, GO INTO DETAILS
� Provide sufficient details on methodology, work plan (steps/phases/Work
packages), selection of case studies etc. (15 pages)
� Explain hypothesis or provide preliminary data (if exists)
� Make sure you give full references (excluded from page limits)
� Provide alternative strategies to mitigate risks
� Check coherency of figures
� Justify requested resources
− Explain involvement of team members (ERC proposals are NOT
collaborative ones)
− show the need of collaborators (if any)│
TIPS - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PARTS
B1 AND B2
PREPARING YOUR INTERVIEW:
SOME TIPS AND ADVICE
If invited to Step 2 (for StG and CoG):
� Get Panel Members interested in you and what you are doing
� Practice thoroughly, several (many?) times; typically a 10 minute
presentation followed by 10-15 minutes of questions
� Panels want to see that these are your ideas, not those of your
supervisor
� It is normal to be nervous…
SCORING
│ 22
STEP 1
• A. Proposal is of sufficient quality to pass to Step 2 of the evaluation
• B. Proposal is of high quality but not sufficient to pass to Step 2 of the evaluation
• C. Proposal is not of sufficient quality to pass to Step 2 of the evaluation
STEP 2
• A: Proposal fully meets the ERC's excellence criterion and is recommended for funding if sufficient funds are available
• B. Proposal meets some but not all elements of the ERC's excellence criterion and will not be funded
RESUBMISSION
RESTRICTIONS
WP 2017WP 2018 foreseen in summer
│ 23
ERC Calls Call dateSubmission
Deadline(s)
Budget € million
(estimated grants)
Starting Grants ERC-2017-StG
26 Jul2016 18 October 2016 605 (415)
Consolidator GrantsERC-2017-CoG
20 Oct 2016 9 February 2017 575 (320)
Advanced GrantsERC-2017-AdG
16 May
2017
31 August 2017 567 (245)
Proof of ConceptERC-2017-PoC
(for ERC grant holders
only)
5 Oct 2016
19 January 2017
25 April 2017
5 September 2017 20 (130)
Highly professional SUPPORT SERVICES operating nationally will
form an essential component of Horizon 2020 implementation. By
SPREADING AWARENESS, GIVING SPECIALIST ADVICE, AND
PROVIDING ON-THE-GROUND GUIDANCE, they will ensure that
the new programme becomes KNOWN AND READILY ACCESSIBLE
TO ALL POTENTIAL APPLICANTS, irrespective of sector or
discipline.
�In accordance with national law, systems should be in place to
ensure that confidential information that comes into the
possession of NCPs is treated accordingly.
25
NCP’S MISSION
*“EC - NCP Guiding Principles”
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/support/national_contact_points.html
PROPOSAL
PRESCREENING
BUDGET REVIEW
H2020 PROGRAMME
SELECTION
OFFICIAL DOCs &
RULES
OFFICIAL DOCs &
RULES
USEFUL DOCs and LINKs
ERC Work Programme 2017 ERC Information for Applicants 2017
http://erc.europa.eu/
http://erc.europa.eu/projects-and-results
USEFUL DOCs and LINKs
Thank you for your attention!
APREAgenzia per la Promozione della Ricerca Europea
via Cavour, 71
00184 - Roma
www.apre.it
Tel. (+39) 06-48939993
Fax. (+39) 06-48902550
Serena Borgna