statistics and anova me 470 spring 2012. planning product development process concept development...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Statistics and ANOVA
ME 470Spring 2012
![Page 2: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PlanningPlanning
Product Development Process
ConceptDevelopment
ConceptDevelopment
System-LevelDesign
System-LevelDesign
DetailDesign
DetailDesign
Testing andRefinement
Testing andRefinement
ProductionRamp-Up
ProductionRamp-Up
Concept Development Process
Perform Economic Analysis
Benchmark Competitive Products
Build and Test Models and Prototypes
IdentifyCustomerNeeds
EstablishTargetSpecifications
GenerateProductConcepts
SelectProductConcept(s)
Set FinalSpecifications
PlanDownstreamDevelopment
MissionStatement Test
ProductConcept(s)
DevelopmentPlan
![Page 3: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
We will use statistics to make good design decisions!
We will categorize populations by the mean, standard deviation, and use control charts to determine if a process is in control.
We may be forced to run experiments to characterize our system. We will use valid statistical tools such as Linear Regression, DOE, and Robust Design methods to help us make those characterizations.
![Page 4: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Let’s consider the Toyota problem.What was the first clue that there was a problem?Starting in 2003, NHSTA received information regarding reports of accelerator pedals that were operating improperly.
How many reports causes the manufacturer to suspect a problem?To issue a recall NHTSA would need to prove that a substantial number of failures attributable to the defect have occurred or is likely to occur in consumers’ use of the vehicle or equipment and that the failures pose an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle
safety.ODI conducted a VOQ-based assessment of UA rates on the subject Lexus incomparison to two peer vehicles and concluded the Lexus LS400t vehicles were not overrepresented in the VOQ database.
How might we look at two populations and decide this?
![Page 5: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
How can we use statistics to make sense of data that we are getting?
• Quiz for the day• What can we say about our M&Ms?
![Page 6: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What kinds of questions can we answer?
• What does the data look like?• What is the mean, the standard deviation?• What are the extreme points?• Is the data normal?• Is there a difference between years? Did one class get
more M&Ms than another?• If you were packaging the M&Ms, are you doing a good
job?• If you are the designer, what factors might cause the
variation?
![Page 7: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
>Stat>Basic Statistics>Display Descriptive Statistics
![Page 9: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Results for 2008, 2010, 2011 (From the “Session”)
![Page 10: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Why would we care about this in design?
![Page 11: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Assessing Shape: BoxplotBSNO
x
2.45
2.40
2.35
2.30
2.25
2.20
Boxplot of BSNOx
(Q2), median
Q1
Q3
largest value excluding outliers
smallest value excluding outliersoutliers are marked as ‘*’
Values between 1.5 and 3 times away from the middle 50% of the data are outliers.
![Page 13: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
201120102008
10
9
8
7
6
5
Year
Sta
ckedTo
tals
Individual Value Plot of StackedTotals vs Year
![Page 14: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
>Stat>Basic Statistics>Normality Test
Select 2008
![Page 15: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Anderson-Darling normality test:Used to determine if data follow a normal distribution. If the p-value is lower than the pre-determined level of significance, the data do not follow a normal distribution.
![Page 16: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Anderson-Darling Normality TestMeasures the area between the fitted line (based on chosen distribution) and the nonparametric step function (based on the plot points). The statistic is a squared distance that is weighted more heavily in the tails of the distribution. AndersonSmaller Anderson-Darling values indicates that the distribution fits the data better.
The Anderson-Darling Normality test is defined as: H0: The data follow a normal distribution.
Ha: The data do not follow a normal distribution.
Another quantitative measure for reporting the result of the normality test is the p-value. A small p-value is an indication that the null hypothesis is false. (Remember: If p is low, H0 must go.)
P-values are often used in hypothesis tests, where you either reject or fail to reject a null hypothesis. The p-value represents the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. The smaller the p-value, the smaller is the probability that you would be making a mistake by rejecting the null hypothesis.
It is customary to call the test statistic (and the data) significant when the null hypothesis H0 is rejected, so we may think of the p-value as the smallest level α at which the data are significant.
![Page 17: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Note that our p value is quite low, which makes us consider rejecting the fact that the data are normal. However, in assessing the closeness of the points to the straight line, “imagine a fat pencil lying along the line. If all the points are covered by this imaginary pencil, a normal distribution adequately describes the data.” Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 6th Edition, p. 39
If you are confused about whether or not to consider the data normal, it is always best if you can consult a statistician. The author has observed statisticians feeling quite happy with assuming very fat lines are normal.
http://www.statit.com/support/quality_practice_tips/normal_probability_plot_interpre.shtml
For more on Normality and the Fat Pencil
![Page 18: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Walter Shewhart
www.york.ac.uk/.../ histstat/people/welcome.htm
Developer of Control Charts in the late 1920’s
You did Control Charts in DFM. There the emphasis was on tolerances. Here the emphasis is on determining if a process is in control. If the process is in control, we want to know the capability.
![Page 19: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
What does this data tell us about our process?
SPC is a continuous improvement tool which minimizes tampering or unnecessary adjustments (which increase variability) by distinguishing between special cause and common cause sources of variation
Control Charts have two basic uses:Give evidence whether a process is operating in a state of statistical control and to highlight the presence of special causes of variation so that corrective action can take place.Maintain the state of statistical control by extending the statistical limits as a basis for real time decisions.
If a process is in a state of statistical control, then capability studies my be undertaken. (But not before!! If a process is not in a state of statistical control, you must bring it under control.)
SPC applies to design activities in that we use data from manufacturing to predict the capability of a manufacturing system. Knowing the capability of the manufacturing system plays a crucial role in selecting the concepts.
![Page 20: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Voice of the Process
Control limits are not spec limits.Control limits define the amount of fluctuation that a
process with only common cause variation will have.Control limits are calculated from the process data.
Any fluctuations within the limits are simply due to the common cause variation of the process.Anything outside of the limits would indicate a special cause (or change) in the process has occurred.
Control limits are the voice of the process.
![Page 21: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The capability index is defined as:
Cp = (allowable range)/6s = (USL - LSL)/6s
USL (Upper Specification Limit)LSL
LCL UCL (Upper Control Limit)
http://lorien.ncl.ac.uk/ming/spc/spc9.htm
![Page 22: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
>Stat>Control Charts>Variable Charts for Individuals>Individuals
![Page 23: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Select all tests
![Page 24: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
These test failures fall into the category of “special cause variations”, statistically unlikely events that are worth looking into as possible problems
![Page 26: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Lower Control Limit
Upper Control Limit
![Page 27: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Are the 2 Distributions Different?X Data
Single X Multiple Xs
Y D
ata
Sin
gle
Y
Mu
ltip
le Y
s
X DataDiscrete Continuous
Y D
ata Dis
cre
te
Co
nti
nu
ou
s
One-sample t-test
Two-sample t-test
ANOVA
X DataDiscrete Continuous
Y D
ata
Dis
cre
te
Co
nti
nu
ou
s
Chi-Square
Simple Linear
Regression
Logistic Regression
ANOVAMultiple Linear
Regression
Multiple Logistic
Regression
Multiple Logistic
Regression
![Page 28: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
When to use ANOVA
The use of ANOVA is appropriate when Dependent variable is continuous Independent variable is discrete, i.e. categorical Independent variable has 2 or more levels under study Interested in the mean value There is one independent variable or more
We will first consider just one independent variable
![Page 29: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Practical Applications
Compare 3 different suppliers of the same component
Compare 4 test cells Compare 2 performance calibrations Compare 6 combustion recipes through simulation Compare our brake failure rate with other companies Compare 3 distributions of M&M’s And MANY more …
![Page 30: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
ANOVA Analysis of Variance
Used to determine the effects of categorical independent variables on the average response of a continuous variable
Choices in MINITAB One-way ANOVA
Use with one factor, varied over multiple levels
Two-way ANOVA Use with two factors, varied over multiple levels
Balanced ANOVA Use with two or more factors and equal sample sizes in each cell
General Linear Model Use anytime!
![Page 31: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
>Stat>ANOVA>General Linear Model
![Page 32: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
3.01.50.0-1.5-3.0
99.9
99
90
50
10
1
0.1
Residual
Perc
ent
7.97.87.77.67.5
3.0
1.5
0.0
-1.5
-3.0
Fitted Value
Resi
dual
2.251.500.750.00-0.75-1.50-2.25-3.00
40
30
20
10
0
Residual
Fre
quency
200180160140120100806040201
3.0
1.5
0.0
-1.5
-3.0
Observation Order
Resi
dual
Normal Probability Plot Versus Fits
Histogram Versus Order
Residual Plots for StackedTotals
![Page 33: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
This p value indicates that the assumption that the years are different is correct
![Page 35: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
>Stat>ANOVA>General Linear Model ---Select Comparisons
We use the Tukey comparison to determine if the years are different. Confidence intervals that contain zero suggest no difference.
![Page 36: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Zero is contained in the interval.The years are NOT different.
Zero is NOT contained in the interval.The years are different.
Tukey Comparison
![Page 37: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Let’s look at what happened with plain M&M’s
![Page 38: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
What do you see with the boxplot?
![Page 39: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
What do you see with the boxplot?
![Page 40: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Do we see anything that looks unusual?
![Page 41: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
General Linear Model: stackedTotal versus StackedYear
Factor Type Levels ValuesStackedYear fixed 4 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009
Analysis of Variance for stackedTotal, using Adjusted SS for TestsSource DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F PStackedYear 3 1165.33 1165.33 388.44 149.39 0.000 Look at low P-value!Error 266 691.63 691.63 2.60Total 269 1856.96
S = 1.61249 R-Sq = 62.75% R-Sq(adj) = 62.33%
Unusual Observations for stackedTotal
Obs stackedTotal Fit SE Fit Residual St Resid 25 27.0000 23.4667 0.2082 3.5333 2.21 R 34 20.0000 23.4667 0.2082 -3.4667 -2.17 R209 40.0000 21.7917 0.1700 18.2083 11.36 R215 21.0000 17.4917 0.2082 3.5083 2.19 R
R denotes an observation with a large standardized residual.
![Page 45: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Grouping Information Using Tukey Method and 95.0% ConfidenceStackedYear N Mean Grouping2004 60 23.5 A2006 90 21.8 B2005 60 20.7 C2009 60 17.5 D
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.Tukey 95.0% Simultaneous Confidence IntervalsResponse Variable stackedTotalAll Pairwise Comparisons among Levels of StackedYearStackedYear = 2004 subtracted from:
StackedYear Lower Center Upper -------+---------+---------+---------2005 -3.531 -2.775 -2.019 (---*---)2006 -2.365 -1.675 -0.985 (-*--)2009 -6.731 -5.975 -5.219 (--*--) -------+---------+---------+--------- -5.0 -2.5 0.0
Zero is not contained in the intervals. Each year is statistically different. (2004 got the most!)
![Page 46: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
StackedYear = 2005 subtracted from:
StackedYear Lower Center Upper -------+---------+---------+---------2006 0.410 1.100 1.790 (-*--)2009 -3.956 -3.200 -2.444 (--*--) -------+---------+---------+--------- -5.0 -2.5 0.0
StackedYear = 2006 subtracted from:
StackedYear Lower Center Upper -------+---------+---------+---------2009 -4.990 -4.300 -3.610 (--*--) -------+---------+---------+--------- -5.0 -2.5 0.0
![Page 47: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Implications for design
• Is there a difference in production performance between the plain and peanut M&Ms?
![Page 48: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Individual Quiz
Name:____________ Section No:__________ CM:_______
You will be given a bag of M&M’s. Do NOT eat the M&M’s.
Count the number of M&M’s in your bag. Record the number of each color, and the overall total. You may approximate if you get a piece of an M&M. When finished, you may eat the M&M’s. Note: You are not required to eat the M&M’s.
Color Number %
Brown
Yellow
Red
Orange
Green
Blue
Other
Total
![Page 49: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Instructions for Minitab Installation
![Page 50: Statistics and ANOVA ME 470 Spring 2012. Planning Product Development Process Concept Development Concept Development System-Level Design System-Level](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081514/56649ec85503460f94bd541a/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Minitab on DFS: