statistical process control and quality management 1
TRANSCRIPT
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT
1
Quality• Fitness for use, acceptable standard• Based on needs, expectations and customer
requests
2
Types of Quality
• Quality of design• Quality of conformance• Quality of performance
Quality of Design• Differences in quality due to design differences,
intentional differences
3
Quality of Conformance• Degree to which product meets or exceeds
standards
Quality of Performance• Long term consistent functioning of the product,
reliability, safety, serviceability, maintainability
Quality and Productivity
• Improved quality leads to lower costs and increased profits
4
Statistics and Quality Management
• Statistical analysis is used to assist with product design, monitor the production process, and check quality of the finished product
5
Checking Finished Product Quality
• Random samples selected from batches of finished product can be used to check for product quality
6
Assisting With Production Design
• A variety of experimental design techniques are available for improving the production process
7
Monitoring the Process
• Control charts is used to monitor the process as it unfolds
• Sampling from the production line to see if variation in product quality is consistent with expectations
8
The Control Chart
• A special type of sequence plot which is used to monitor a process
• Throughout the process measurements are taken and plotted in a sequence plot
• Plot also contains upper and lower control limits indicating the expected range of the process when it is behaving properly
9
Examples
10
PROCESS CONTROL CHART
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97
BATCH NUMBER
BA
TC
H M
EA
N
MEAN TRUE MEAN LOWER UPPER
Variation
• There is no two natural items in any category are the same.
• Variation may be quite large or very small.
• If variation very small, it may appear that items are identical, but precision instruments will show differences.
3 Categories of variation
• Within-piece variation– One portion of surface is rougher than another
portion.
• Apiece-to-piece variation– Variation among pieces produced at the same
time.
• Time-to-time variation– Service given early would be different from
that given later in the day.
Source of variation
• Equipment– Tool wear, machine vibration, …
• Material– Raw material quality
• Environment– Temperature, pressure, humadity
• Operator– Operator performs- physical & emotional
Control Chart Viewpoint
Variation due to Common or chance causes Assignable causes
Control chart may be used to discover “assignable causes”
Control chart functions
• Control charts are powerful aids to understanding the performance of a process over time.
PROCESSInputOutput
What’s causing variability?
Control charts identify variation
• Chance causes - “common cause”– inherent to the process or random and not
controllable– if only common cause present, the process is
considered stable or “in control”• Assignable causes - “special cause”
– variation due to outside influences– if present, the process is “out of control”
Control charts help us learn more about processes
• Separate common and special causes of variation
• Determine whether a process is in a state of statistical control or out-of-control
• Estimate the process parameters (mean, variation) and assess the performance of a process or its capability
Control charts to monitor processes
• To monitor output, we use a control chart– we check things like the mean, range, standard
deviation• To monitor a process, we typically use two
control charts– mean (or some other central tendency measure)– variation (typically using range or standard
deviation)
Types of Data
• Variable data– Product characteristic that can be measured
• Length, size, weight, height, time, velocity
• Attribute dataProduct characteristic evaluated with a discrete choice
• Good/bad, yes/no
Types of Control Charts
• Control Chart For The Mean(X chart)
• Control Chart For The Range(R chart)
• Control Chart For A Proportion(p chart)
• Control Chart For Attribute Measures(c chart)
20
Control Chart For The Sample Mean
• Assuming that the sample mean is approximately normal with mean and standard deviation , a control chart for the mean usually consists of three horizontal lines
• The vertical axis is used to plot the magnitude of observed sample means while the horizontal axis represents time or the order of the sequence of observed means
21
Control Chart For The Sample Mean
• The center line is at the mean, and upper and lower control limits are at
• +3 and -3
• Since (standard deviation)is usually unknown the
• term is usually replaced by an estimator based on the sample range
22
n/
n/ n/
Control Chart For The Sample Mean
The formula is given by
where = average value of the range
=
k = number of samplesThe values of A2 depend on the sample size
23
RAx2
R
k
iikR
1/
Control Chart For The Sample Mean
• LCL =
• UCL =
24
2ARx
2ARx
Control Chart For The Range
• Designed to monitor variability in the product• Range easier to determine than standard
deviation• Distribution of sample range assumes product
measurement is normally distributed
25
Control Chart For The Range• Upper and lower control limits and center line
obtained from and the values of D3, D4 • according to the formulae
• LCL =
• UCL =
• The values of D3, D4 are based on sample size
26
RD3
RD4
R
Control Chart For The Sample Proportion
• Population proportion • The sample mean is now a mean proportion given
by
• Where = total number of objects in sample with characteristic divided by total sample size
27
p
p
Control Chart For The Sample Proportion
• Using the central limit theorem the control limits are given by:
28
np
)(
13
Control Chart For The Sample Proportion
• Since the true proportion is usually unknown we replace it by the average proportion
• If the sample size varies then the upper and lower limits will vary and the equations become:
• where ni = sample size in sample i29
n
ppp
)(
13
in
ppp
)( 13
Control Chart For Attribute Measures
30
• Alternative method of counting good and bad items.• Defects are measured by merely counting the no. of
defects.
• Where c = total number of defects in a sample
Control Chart For Attribute Measures
• Process average or central line
c=
• UCL:
• LCL:
31
pn
c
cc 3
cc 3
Example: Control Charts for Variable Data Slip Ring Diameter (cm)Sample 1 2 3 4 5 X R
1 5.02 5.01 4.94 4.99 4.962 5.01 5.03 5.07 4.95 4.963 4.99 5.00 4.93 4.92 4.994 5.03 4.91 5.01 4.98 4.895 4.95 4.92 5.03 5.05 5.016 4.97 5.06 5.06 4.96 5.03 7 5.05 5.01 5.10 4.96 4.99 8 5.09 5.10 5.00 4.99 5.089 5.14 5.10 4.99 5.08 5.09
10 5.01 4.98 5.08 5.07 4.99
Example: Control Charts for Variable Data Slip Ring Diameter (cm)Sample 1 2 3 4 5 X R
1 5.02 5.01 4.94 4.99 4.96 4.98 0.082 5.01 5.03 5.07 4.95 4.96 5.00 0.123 4.99 5.00 4.93 4.92 4.99 4.97 0.084 5.03 4.91 5.01 4.98 4.89 4.96 0.145 4.95 4.92 5.03 5.05 5.01 4.99 0.136 4.97 5.06 5.06 4.96 5.03 5.01 0.107 5.05 5.01 5.10 4.96 4.99 5.02 0.148 5.09 5.10 5.00 4.99 5.08 5.05 0.119 5.14 5.10 4.99 5.08 5.09 5.08 0.15
10 5.01 4.98 5.08 5.07 4.99 5.03 0.10 50.09
1.15
CalculationFrom Table above:• Sigma X-bar = 50.09• Sigma R = 1.15• m = 10Thus;• X-Double bar = 50.09/10 = 5.009 cm• R-bar = 1.15/10 = 0.115 cm
Note: The control limits are only preliminary with 10 samples.It is desirable to have at least 25 samples.
Trial control limit• UCLx-bar = X-D bar + A2 R-bar
= 5.009 + (0.577)(0.115) = 5.075 cm
• LCLx-bar = X-D bar - A2 R-bar
= 5.009 - (0.577)(0.115) = 4.943 cm
• UCLR = D4R-bar
= (2.114)(0.115) = 0.243 cm• LCLR = D3R-bar
= (0)(0.115) = 0 cm
For A2, D3, D4: see Table B, Appendix
n = 5
3-Sigma Control Chart Factors
Sample size X-chart R-chart
n A2 D3 D4
2 1.88 0 3.27
3 1.02 0 2.57
4 0.73 0 2.28
5 0.58 0 2.11
6 0.48 0 2.00
7 0.42 0.08 1.92
8 0.37 0.14 1.86
X-bar Chart
R Chart
39
Subgroup 18 2 3 4 5
1 12.45 12.39 12.40 12.37 12.40
2 12.55 12.38 12.36 12.38 12.44
3 12.46 12.44 12.30 12.39 12.36
4 12.38 12.39 12.37 12.55 12.37
5 12.37 12.44 12.44 12.37 12.38
6 12.45 12.37 12.36 12.41 12.39
7 12.46 12.38 12.51 12.44 12.55
8 12.44 12.39 12.38 12.39 12.37
9 12.44 12.55 12.41 12.44 12.39
10 12.35 12.38 12.37 12.44 12.38
11 12.36 12.40 12.41 12.35 12.44
12 12.51 12.36 12.41 12.36 12.39
13 12.38 12.30 12.45 12.37 12.44
14 12.41 12.37 12.45 12.45 12.37
15 12.37 12.44 12.45 12.46 12.38
40
Sample No. Number of defects
1 10
2 9
3 8
4 11
5 7
6 12
7 7
8 10
9 13
10 12
11 13
12 14
From a lot of 100
41
Sample No. Number of defects Proportion
1 10 0.10
2 9 0.9
3 8 0.8
4 11 0.11
5 7 0.7
6 12 0.12
7 7 0.7
8 10 0.10
9 13 0.13
10 12 0.12
11 13 0.13
12 14 0.14
From a lot of 100
The NormalDistribution
-3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3Mean
68.26%95.44%99.74%
= Standard deviation
LSL USL
-3 +3CL
• 34.13% of data lie between and 1 above the mean (). • 34.13% between and 1 below the mean. • Approximately two-thirds (68.28 %) within 1 of the mean.• 13.59% of the data lie between one and two standard deviations • Finally, almost all of the data (99.74%) are within 3 of the mean.
Define the 3-sigma limits for sample means as follows:
What is the probability that the sample means will lie outside 3-sigma limits?
Note that the 3-sigma limits for sample means are different from natural tolerances which are at
Normal Distribution Review
94345
0503015
3
07755
0503015
3
.).(
. Limit Lower
.).(
. Limit Upper
n
n
3
Common Causes
Process Out of Control
• The term out of control is a change in the process due to an assignable cause.
• When a point (subgroup value) falls outside its control limits, the process is out of control.
Assignable Causes
(a) Mean
Grams
Average
Assignable Causes
(b) Spread
Grams
Average
Assignable Causes
(c) Shape
Grams
Average
Control Charts
UCL
Nominal
LCL
Assignable causes likely
1 2 3Samples
Control Chart Examples
Nominal
UCL
LCL
Sample number
Var
iati
ons
Control Limits and Errors
LCL
Processaverage
UCL
(a) Three-sigma limitsType I error:Probability of searching for a cause when none exists
Control Limits and Errors
Type I error:Probability of searching for a cause when none exists
UCL
LCL
Processaverage
(b) Two-sigma limits
Type II error:Probability of concludingthat nothing has changed
Control Limits and Errors
UCL
Shift in process average
LCL
Processaverage
(a) Three-sigma limits
Type II error:Probability of concludingthat nothing has changed
Control Limits and Errors
UCL
Shift in process average
LCL
Processaverage
(b) Two-sigma limits
Achieve the purpose
Our goal is to decrease the variation inherent in a process over time.
As we improve the process, the spread of the data will continue to decrease.
Quality improves!!
Improvement
Examine the process
• A process is considered to be stable and in a state of control, or under control, when the performance of the process falls within the statistically calculated control limits and exhibits only chance, or common causes.
Consequences of misinterpreting the process
• Blaming people for problems that they cannot control• Spending time and money looking for problems that do
not exist• Spending time and money on unnecessary process
adjustments• Taking action where no action is warranted• Asking for worker-related improvements when process
improvements are needed first
-3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3Mean
68.26%95.44%99.74%
Process variation• When a system is subject to only chance
causes of variation, 99.74% of the measurements will fall within 6 standard deviations– If 1000 subgroups are measured, 997
will fall within the six sigma limits.
Chart zones• Based on our knowledge of the normal curve, a
control chart exhibits a state of control when:♥ Two thirds of all points are near the center value.♥ The points appear to float back and forth across
the centerline.♥ The points are balanced on both sides of the
centerline.♥ No points beyond the control limits.♥ No patterns or trends.
Acceptance Sampling
Acceptance sampling is a form of testing that involves taking random samples of “lots,” or batches, of finished products and measuring them against predetermined standards.
• A “lot,” or batch, of items can be inspected in several ways, including the use of single, double, or sequential sampling.
Single Sampling
• Two numbers specify a single sampling plan: They are the number of items to be sampled (n) and a pre specified acceptable number of defects (c). If there are fewer or equal defects in the lot than the acceptance number, c, then the whole batch will be accepted. If there are more than c defects, the whole lot will be rejected or subjected to 100% screening.
Double Sampling• Often a lot of items is so good or so bad that we can
reach a conclusion about its quality by taking a smaller sample than would have been used in a single sampling plan. If the number of defects in this smaller sample (of size n1) is less than or equal to some lower limit (c1), the lot can be accepted. If the number of defects exceeds an upper limit (c2), the whole lot can be rejected. But if the number of defects in the n1 sample is between c1 and c2, a second sample (of size n2) is drawn. The cumulative results determine whether to accept or reject the lot. The concept is called double sampling.
Sequential Sampling
• Multiple sampling is an extension of double sampling, with smaller samples used sequentially until a clear decision can be made. When units are randomly selected from a lot and tested one by one, with the cumulative number of inspected pieces and defects recorded, the process is called sequential sampling.
OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (OC) CURVES
• The operating characteristic (OC) curve describes how well an acceptance plan discriminates between good and bad lots. A curve pertains to a specific plan, that is, a combination of n (sample size) and c (acceptance level). It is intended to show the probability that the plan will accept lots of various quality levels.
• Figure shows a perfect discrimination plan for a company that wants to reject all lots with more than 2 ½ % defectives and accept all lots with less than 2 ½ % defectives.
OC Curves for Two Different Acceptable Levels of Defects (c = 1, c = 4) for the Same Sample Size (n = 100).
• So one way to increase the probability of accepting only good lots and rejecting only bad lots with random sampling is to set very tight acceptance levels.
• OC Curves for Two Different Sample Sizes (n = 25, n = 100) but Same Acceptance Percentages (4%). Larger sample size shows better discrimination.
Sampling Terms
• Acceptance quality level (AQL): the percentage of defects at which consumers are willing to accept lots as “good”
• Lot tolerance percent defective (LTPD): the upper limit on the percentage of defects that a consumer is willing to accept
• Consumer’s risk: the probability that a lot contained defectives exceeding the LTPD will be accepted
• Producer’s risk: the probability that a lot containing the acceptable quality level will be rejected
THE OPERATING-CHARACTERISTIC (OC) CURVE
• For a given a sampling plan and a specified true fraction defective p, we can calculate – Pa -- Probability of accepting lot
• If lot is truly good, 1 - Pa = a (Producers' Risk)
• If lot is truly bad, Pa = b (Consumer ‘s Risk)
• A plot of Pa as a function of p is called the OC curve for a given sampling plan
The OC curve shows the features of a particular sampling plan, including the risks of making a wrong decision.
Construction of OC curve• In attribute sampling, where products are determined to
be either good or bad, a binomial distribution is usually employed to build the OC curve. The binomial equation is
where n = number of items sampled (called trials) p = probability that an x (defect) will occur on any one trial P(x) = probability of exactly x results in n trials
In a Poisson approximation of the binomial distribution, the mean of the binomial, which is np, is used as the mean of the Poisson, which is λ; that is,
λ = np
Example• Probability of acceptance A shipment of 2,000
portable battery units for microcomputers is about to be inspected by a Malaysian importer. The Korean manufacturer and the importer have set up a sampling plan in which the risk is limited to 5% at an acceptable quality level (AQL) of 2% defective, and the risk is set to 10% at Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD) = 7% defective. We want to construct the OC curve for the plan of n = 120 sample size and an acceptance level of c ≤ 3 defectives. Both firms want to know if this plan will satisfy their quality and risk requirements.
Example
N=1000n = 100AQL=1%LTPD=5%ß=10%α = 5%C<=2 Does the plan meet the producer’s and consumer’s
requirement.
AVERAGE OUTGOING QUALITY
In most sampling plans, when a lot is rejected, the entire lot is inspected and all of the defective items are replaced. Use of this replacement technique improves the average outgoing quality in terms of percent defective. In fact, given (1) any sampling plan that replaces all defective items encountered and (2) the true incoming percent defective for the lot, it is possible to determine the average outgoing quality (AOQ) in percent defective.
AVERAGE OUTGOING QUALITY
The equation for AOQ is
ExampleSelected Values of% Defective
Mean of Poisson, λ = np
P (acceptance)
.01 1 0.920
.02 2 0.677
.03 3 0.423
.04 4 0.238
.05 5 0.125
.06 6 0.062
Example
• The percent defective from an incoming lot in is 3%. An OC curve showed the probability of acceptance to be .515. Given a lot size of 2,000 and a sample of 120, what is the average outgoing quality in percent defective?